| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
RubyPorto
SniggWaffe
YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
2783
   |
Posted - 2013.02.21 08:51:00 -
[1] - Quote
Jacob Holland wrote:It's not, as a specific scenario, against the rules per se; but its something of a risk.
Of what? If it's not against the rules, what do you think the risk is?
Also, I see nothing in the rules of the Character Bazaar that indicates that it is intended to be walled off from the metagame. The ban on scams is simply to allow similar functionality to the in game market (where you will always get the item you paid for, and exactly the item you paid for, at exactly the price you paid). There's no ban on overpriced characters, afterall.
This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
"the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP)." -CCP Solomon |
RubyPorto
SniggWaffe
YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
2787
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 15:19:00 -
[2] - Quote
Arduemont wrote:Actually I'm pretty sure this is to a violation of the EULA. Currently there is a section that prohibits you from pretending be any person other than yourself. To pretend to be another player is against the EULA. And if your saying you are someone else from who you are (ie, to pretend your character was sold and your not the person who owned the character in the first place), then it's pretty much the same thing.
So... spies are breaking the EULA?
This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
"the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP)." -CCP Solomon |
RubyPorto
SniggWaffe
YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
2788
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 18:20:00 -
[3] - Quote
Arduemont wrote:I know that's what the rule was probably created for, but the literal word "else" simpley means "other than". So if you pretending to be someone else, your just pretending to be someone who isn't you and that's all. It wouldn't mean to pretend to be anyone specific. I know it's just semantics and arguably a pointless discussion given the likely intention of the rule... but what really counts is whether CCP make this distinction.
If you are going to make an argument that hinges on the specific wording of a rule, you kind of have to produce a copy of the rule you're talking about.
Have you found it yet?
This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
"the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP)." -CCP Solomon |
| |
|