| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

baltec1
Bat Country
5468
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 10:55:00 -
[1] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:With regard to the article by poetic...and I quote, "...a very small subset of the entire Eve population..."
So, what exactly is all the fuss about?
Ignore them or gank them.
They whine on the forums to change the game. They are the ones who have broken the barge lineup and they are the ones who are whining about bumping. Anything that gets in the way of their game time is seen as bad and must be removed even if that thing is a cornerstone of EVE. |

baltec1
Bat Country
5469
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 11:10:00 -
[2] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:If there are so few of them, and they can make CCP dance to their tune, they seem to me to be really, really good at Eve. Perhaps the, 'make Eve harder - meaner - tougher', folk should ask them for advice on meta-gaming. 
They post a lot. We have learned our lesson and now counter them in every post and hit them with real numbers that they cannot counter. They managed to get one change through and nothing else. A change that will be delt with when barges are balanced correctly. |

baltec1
Bat Country
5469
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 14:36:00 -
[3] - Quote
March rabbit wrote:I don't know when you started this whine campaign but goons and other whiners make like 99.99% of whine posts in forums since i first visited it....  let's say for every 1 anti-suicide gank post i see 10 posts "nerf this, nerf that, nerf whatever bears have!"
Wrong.
We reply to their threads and turn it on them to get real problems fixed. |

baltec1
Bat Country
5469
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 19:07:00 -
[4] - Quote
MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote: Been playing since '05 and have seen just as many or even more whines from the hardcore 'elite' PVPers. So your claim is simply false. In fact, I've seen you yourself whine quite more often than any other one "carebear" in the forums.
Yeah yeah. I know, if it's you making the complain then it isn't a whine. It's only a whine when it's coming from one of those pesky "carebears".
The difference between a whine and a complaint is one of facts. I have them and the whiners only have insults.
It's one of the two big misused words around here, the other being cying. |

baltec1
Bat Country
5469
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 19:10:00 -
[5] - Quote
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:
And then Unifex stated one of those things the baltec1 of the game still can't understand:
I see you think that all solo players are bears. I don't make that mistake. |

baltec1
Bat Country
5470
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 19:44:00 -
[6] - Quote
MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote: On the subject of insults, I've seen these thrown out more from the elite PVP camp than from carebears themselves, you included. Carebears and miners are by far the largest targets for 'elitist' PVPers to sling insults and degrading comments against. Since I started playing it's non-stop. So again, I have to call you out on your post above.
From my observation, reason and logic has never explained the level of hate, disdain, and contempt that you and some of the other very vocal anti-carebear players bring to this forum. But to be fair, this behavior isn't unique to Eve alone. However, for whatever reasons, you do tend to be more aggressive and vocal than what I've observed elsewhere.
I spent 8 months giving out anti gank barge fittings and got nothing but insults back. Sorry but bears are by far the most likely to start throwing around the insults. But please, by all means go find where I have gone out and insulted people right off the bat.
While you're at it, look up the amount of insults that get thrown at me because of my corp and alliance. |

baltec1
Bat Country
5470
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 19:53:00 -
[7] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:baltec1 wrote:insults that get thrown at me because of my corp and alliance. it's the go to comment when people run out of valid points, doesn't matter what your corp or alliance is. not in goons but somewhere else? they say they've never heard of you, you're a nobody, hence your voice is irrelevant. not in a player corp? assumed to be some npc alt hiding, hence your voice is irrelevant. no matter what corp you are in, because it's not theirs, your voice is irrelevant.
True.
|

baltec1
Bat Country
5470
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 19:57:00 -
[8] - Quote
Skeln Thargensen wrote:and they're still crying about the barges 
See?
That word is losing its meaning because of people like this abusing it. |

baltec1
Bat Country
5472
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 21:17:00 -
[9] - Quote
Skeln Thargensen wrote:Dave Stark wrote:warping to a gate isn't a reason. if i'm in a mining ship, i'm mining. so being able to warp to a gate is completely irrelevant. it also seems irrelevant to about 1/3 of high sec who appear to be using a retriever too. looking at the figures between just the mack and ret, there appears to be more ret users, than mack users in high sec for example.
as for the rest of that, it again, has nothing to do with the balance of mining ships. it's not irrelevant to mining. I always mine systems with no station and have to make at least one jump to my refine station. you have to get out there these days.
The belts in systems next door to Amarr are untouched. Theres no need to solo mine in a stationless system. |

baltec1
Bat Country
5473
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 21:32:00 -
[10] - Quote
Skeln Thargensen wrote:baltec1 wrote:The belts in systems next door to Amarr are untouched. Theres no need to solo mine in a stationless system. haha, good one.
Today at 10:00 EVE time they were untouched still with nobody in them. The only systems the get mined out constantly are the ones around Jita, even Amarr has rocks in it. |

baltec1
Bat Country
5473
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 21:43:00 -
[11] - Quote
Skeln Thargensen wrote:Dave Stark wrote:there are plenty of high sec systems with a station, and plenty of belts that you simply don't need to mine in a system without a station. I haven't seen a ganker in months and i'm often the only person in local. that;s pretty good security. I have an ore hold of 35Km3, I only need to jump every 40 minutes or so.
Few people see a ganker these days. |

baltec1
Bat Country
5473
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 21:44:00 -
[12] - Quote
Jensaro Koraka wrote:baltec1 wrote:Skeln Thargensen wrote:baltec1 wrote:The belts in systems next door to Amarr are untouched. Theres no need to solo mine in a stationless system. haha, good one. Today at 10:00 EVE time they were untouched still with nobody in them. The only systems the get mined out constantly are the ones around Jita, even Amarr has rocks in it. Chribba, I am disappoint.
To be fair he only has 3 lasers on the veldnought and no bonuses. |

baltec1
Bat Country
5473
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 21:53:00 -
[13] - Quote
Skeln Thargensen wrote:Dave Stark wrote:i find it funny that you think you're going to get ganked. I don't think i'm allowed to post killmails my mack has got but trust me it's still out there.
Your more likely to have your tengu ganked. Barges are statistically the safest ship to be in at the moment. |

baltec1
Bat Country
5473
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 22:13:00 -
[14] - Quote
Takseen wrote: Carebears forced CCP to apply Tiericide to barges?
8 months of whining influenced CCP into thinking the bare hull of an exhumer was profitable to gank. The ships were buffed on a lie and as a result, the lineup ended up just as unbalanced as before the changes. |

baltec1
Bat Country
5473
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 22:18:00 -
[15] - Quote
Skeln Thargensen wrote:baltec1 wrote:Your more likely to have your tengu ganked. Barges are statistically the safest ship to be in at the moment. why do i have these highly amusing mackinaw killmails then? I don't want to lose a single mackinaw, because it takes a long term to replace it with mining income. i mean, if you aren't running three accounts with orca support.
Barge/exhumer kills are at their lowest point in the history of EVE. |

baltec1
Bat Country
5473
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 22:20:00 -
[16] - Quote
Takseen wrote:
Well barge tanks were laughably weak at the time, I remember looking at the numbers. It was a struggle to get a ship costing hundreds of millions of ISK to survive an attack from a destroyer costing a 10th of that money. Perhaps they overdid it, I haven't checked the new figures.
There's better ways to get miners into nullsec. See the nullsec vs highsec industry threadnaught on front page of GD.
The barges were indeed horrible before the patch but the exhumers however were more than able to be tanked. |

baltec1
Bat Country
5473
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 22:58:00 -
[17] - Quote
Mazelle wrote:
Your obsession with the state of mining barges is hilarious. Genuinely curious: why are you so passionate about that little corner of the game?
Here's some facts for you:
1. CCP didn't balance the barges because of some mythical carebear influence, they balanced them along with other ships based on the state of the game. Strings of Hulkageddons, interdictions etc. are more to blame than some imagined complainers. Have some faith that your game devs know what they're doing and don't blindly mess with stuff based on some forum posts.
2. If you find it remotely challenging to gank a miner, you are terrible.
1. They were influenced by the months of whines which is why they got an EHP buff dispite the fact that the exhumers already had a tank in line with heavy assault cruisers. They also listened to us and removed an EHP buff they were going to give to the hulk.
2. We gank freighters. Most miners is still very easy to kill, we simply have no reason to do it now that there is no profit in it. |

baltec1
Bat Country
5473
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 23:27:00 -
[18] - Quote
Captain Tardbar wrote:baltec1 wrote:1. They were influenced by the months of whines which is why they got an EHP buff dispite the fact that the exhumers already had a tank in line with heavy assault cruisers. They also listened to us and removed an EHP buff they were going to give to the hulk. I don't know. There has been plenty of "Nerf Hi-Sec, Buff null-sec" threadnaughts going on for quite some time, yet there doesn't seem to be any inclination on CCP part they are going to follow suit on those demands. Now, it could be that a large percentage of players actually did say in their cancelation reason (when they canceled their subs) that they were quitting because their miner was ganked and then CCP acted on that instead of the forum complaints (as it directly hits their wallet). But the truth is we don't know. CCP never came out and said we're making these changes because of X reason. It was just assumed because of the threadnaughts that it was because of that. They might have had other reaons and we wouldn't know. Mabye a magic 8ball that said "Buff Miners" came up during the team meetings.
They said that mining barge hulls should not be profitable to gank. A lie that a very vocal section of bears kept on repeating that CCP belived and made the primary change in the rebalance. It was a direct response to end the constant flow of terrible threads on the subject. |

baltec1
Bat Country
5473
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 23:41:00 -
[19] - Quote
MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote: baltec1,
Firstly, you are no stranger around here. Just as I am known to be pro-carebear, you run on the opposite side of the line. Don't insult yourself by claiming anything else. Your 'selfless acts' of providing miners with fits ran along the lines of fit tank and HTFU. Stop pretending to be the gift to carebears. You're not. Ever since I can remember you've had nothing but disdain and contempt for carebears.
Second, what do you expect people to think of an alliance that, up until the time that one of your own died on a terrorist attack, made it a point to run campaigns based on real-life terrorist attack themes, even though repeatedly you were told that it was in poor taste? You associate with a group of players that have gone out of their way to grief play and come in here pretending like it's undeserved? You poor thing.
At no point have we ever taken part in "grief play". |

baltec1
Bat Country
5473
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 23:47:00 -
[20] - Quote
Why are you taking a drunken guy speaking to goons while wearing a shiney wizards hat seriously?
And whats makes you think we would? |

baltec1
Bat Country
5473
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 23:59:00 -
[21] - Quote
MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote: I'm sorry. I wasn't aware that he was drunk during the days it took him to prepare his presentation. But yeah, it's always the alcohol's fault :).
The only people who took that seriously was white knighters such as yourself with an axe to grind. The irony here the people such as yourself arn't joking when you say things like
Quote:I hereby encourage people ton++ find and kill Alexander Gianturco.
|

baltec1
Bat Country
5473
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 00:07:00 -
[22] - Quote
MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote:I beg your pardon? I see, retorting to lying now  . Please do show where I have EVER said anything like that.
I see you still suffer from selective reading.
This subject was resolved last year and resulted in a disgusting show from all sides. Just drop that chip and move on like everyone else did. |

baltec1
Bat Country
5473
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 00:39:00 -
[23] - Quote
Jensaro Koraka wrote: Never? That's odd, I seem to remember CCP complimenting the gankers when it first started happening. Of course, that was when we had original CCP like Oveur and not Punktarded.
CCP were fooled into thinking the bare hull of the exhumers were profitable to gank. |
| |
|