EVE Search - Ships that can Solo C3s

All Channels

Wormholes

Ships that can Solo C3s

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Roime Shiva Furnace 2278	Posted - 2013.03.22 07:37:00 - [31] - Quote I'm testing this solo Domi. Goal is to have a T1 Gallente ship than can solo C3s without being completely reliant on cap boosters. [Dominix, PVE 0.1] Damage Control II Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II Armor Explosive Hardener II Large Ancillary Armor Repairer, Nanite Repair Paste Domination Large Armor Repairer Drone Damage Amplifier II Omnidirectional Tracking Link II Omnidirectional Tracking Link II Cap Recharger II Cap Recharger II Cap Recharger II Drone Link Augmentor II 350mm Railgun II, Spike L 350mm Railgun II, Spike L 350mm Railgun II, Spike L 350mm Railgun II, Spike L 350mm Railgun II, Spike L Large Capacitor Control Circuit I Large Capacitor Control Circuit I Large Auxiliary Nano Pump I Garde II x5 Bouncer II x5 + lights, mediums med repper drones and ***, haven't settled on selection yet 643 dps @ 84km (max drone range. optimals are higher) 827 dps @ 30ish km Needs fitting implant love, bloo bloo Can permarun the Domination repper, which is enough for most parts of the waves. Overheat tank for beginning of heavy waves, reload AAR when not needed. Only tested true solo in OFS and FFS in non-bonused systems, works fine. Legion links needed for mag & radars. Tank can easily be improved by replacing the DDA II with a RAH and/or upgrading the faction repper. Domination reppers cost nothing and use least cap but don't rep as much as the navy versions, faction is needed to make it fit. And yeah those hardwires too. -á- All I really wanted was to build a castle among the stars -*
JeanMichel Bizarre Loki's Legion 75	Posted - 2013.03.22 11:19:00 - [32] - Quote I solo C3 anomalies with this: http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=16776688 Admittedly it's painfully slow, but it beats idling at the pos. Tank is great with a passive recharge rate of around 130hp/s if I recall correctly. I rarely ever need to warp out, but it does happen. It's very, VERY cheap, which makes this easily replaceable and with a tank better than most T2 fitted tengus and the dps only slightly (yeah ok, maybe considerably) worse, I really can't justify flying anything for now. omniscient omnipotent omnipresent without judgement
Mr Kidd Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 1076	Posted - 2013.03.22 11:24:00 - [33] - Quote I love solo ships in a C3.....so yummy...nom nom nom.... HTFU!...for the children!
Helene Chenal Offensive Upholder 2	Posted - 2013.03.22 12:32:00 - [34] - Quote Roime wrote: I'm testing this solo Domi. Goal is to have a T1 Gallente ship than can solo C3s without being completely reliant on cap boosters. [Dominix, PVE 0.1] Damage Control II Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II Armor Explosive Hardener II Large Ancillary Armor Repairer, Nanite Repair Paste Domination Large Armor Repairer Drone Damage Amplifier II Omnidirectional Tracking Link II Omnidirectional Tracking Link II Cap Recharger II Cap Recharger II Cap Recharger II Drone Link Augmentor II 350mm Railgun II, Spike L 350mm Railgun II, Spike L 350mm Railgun II, Spike L 350mm Railgun II, Spike L 350mm Railgun II, Spike L Large Capacitor Control Circuit I Large Capacitor Control Circuit I Large Auxiliary Nano Pump I Garde II x5 Bouncer II x5 + lights, mediums med repper drones and ****, haven't settled on selection yet 643 dps @ 84km (max drone range. optimals are higher) 827 dps @ 30ish km Needs fitting implant love, bloo bloo Can permarun the Domination repper, which is enough for most parts of the waves. Overheat tank for beginning of heavy waves, reload AAR when not needed. Only tested true solo in OFS and FFS in non-bonused systems, works fine. Legion links needed for mag & radars. Tank can easily be improved by replacing the DDA II with a RAH and/or upgrading the faction repper. Domination reppers cost nothing and use least cap but don't rep as much as the navy versions, faction is needed to make it fit. And yeah those hardwires too. You'd be better off in a tech 2 blaster Hyperion IMHO
Roime Shiva Furnace 2292	Posted - 2013.03.22 16:09:00 - [35] - Quote Last time I tested the Hype (granted it was over a year ago) it obviously tanked like boss, but with blasters it was ridiculously slow to burn to the targets, and with rails it had serious problems dealing with the frigs. Unbonused lights couldn't even kill all the frigs due to them repping, and mediums often died in a fire without HP bonus. -á- All I really wanted was to build a castle among the stars -
Derath Ellecon Washburne Holdings Situation: Normal 1233	Posted - 2013.03.22 16:19:00 - [36] - Quote Helene Chenal wrote: You'd be better off in a tech 2 blaster Hyperion IMHO So far all of your advise in this thread has been just bad. You should just stop. You've even admitted you haven't even run C3 sites in forever. And not since the neut change.
Lenier Chenal Anomalous Existence Existential Anxiety 24	Posted - 2013.03.22 17:38:00 - [37] - Quote Derath Ellecon wrote: Helene Chenal wrote: You'd be better off in a tech 2 blaster Hyperion IMHO So far all of your advise in this thread has been just bad. You should just stop. You've even admitted you haven't even run C3 sites in forever. And not since the neut change. Advising someone to run c3s solo is the original bad piece of advice. You should stop being a scrub. I've ran them since the neut change, but not since the cap battery change - I use fully passive ships when not cap escalating anyways. I personally have solo'd c3s in a Hyperion, without issues. The guy above me must suck with drone skills. His domi fit is going to get him killed someday, far sooner than using the Hyperion.
Derath Ellecon Washburne Holdings Situation: Normal 1233	Posted - 2013.03.22 18:05:00 - [38] - Quote Lenier Chenal wrote: Derath Ellecon wrote: Helene Chenal wrote: You'd be better off in a tech 2 blaster Hyperion IMHO So far all of your advise in this thread has been just bad. You should just stop. You've even admitted you haven't even run C3 sites in forever. And not since the neut change. Advising someone to run c3s solo is the original bad piece of advice. You should stop being a scrub. I've ran them since the neut change, but not since the cap battery change - I use fully passive ships when not cap escalating anyways. I personally have solo'd c3s in a Hyperion, without issues. The guy above me must suck with drone skills. His domi fit is going to get him killed someday, far sooner than using the Hyperion. I don't see many in this thread advising anyone to run solo. The OP asked about ships that can solo. I even linked a KM to show a fit that CAN run solo fine, but also to illustrate it is a gank waiting to happen. learn2read. You must not know Roime. I'm sure his drone skills are fine. And he can afford to lose that domi. You could lose 2 of those domis for the price of 1.5 Hyperion hulls. And there is no need for a fully passive fit in a C3 or a C4 for that matter.
Lenier Chenal Anomalous Existence Existential Anxiety 24	Posted - 2013.03.22 18:23:00 - [39] - Quote Derath Ellecon wrote: Lenier Chenal wrote: Derath Ellecon wrote: Helene Chenal wrote: You'd be better off in a tech 2 blaster Hyperion IMHO So far all of your advise in this thread has been just bad. You should just stop. You've even admitted you haven't even run C3 sites in forever. And not since the neut change. Advising someone to run c3s solo is the original bad piece of advice. You should stop being a scrub. I've ran them since the neut change, but not since the cap battery change - I use fully passive ships when not cap escalating anyways. I personally have solo'd c3s in a Hyperion, without issues. The guy above me must suck with drone skills. His domi fit is going to get him killed someday, far sooner than using the Hyperion. I don't see many in this thread advising anyone to run solo. The OP asked about ships that can solo. I even linked a KM to show a fit that CAN run solo fine, but also to illustrate it is a gank waiting to happen. learn2read. You must not know Roime. I'm sure his drone skills are fine. And he can afford to lose that domi. You could lose 2 of those domis for the price of 1.5 Hyperion hulls. And there is no need for a fully passive fit in a C3 or a C4 for that matter. I don't think anyone soloing c3s is hurt by the isk loss as a result of a gank, perhaps the KM though.
Mr Kidd Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 1076	Posted - 2013.03.22 18:50:00 - [40] - Quote Lenier Chenal wrote: Derath Ellecon wrote: Lenier Chenal wrote: Derath Ellecon wrote: Helene Chenal wrote: You'd be better off in a tech 2 blaster Hyperion IMHO So far all of your advise in this thread has been just bad. You should just stop. You've even admitted you haven't even run C3 sites in forever. And not since the neut change. Advising someone to run c3s solo is the original bad piece of advice. You should stop being a scrub. I've ran them since the neut change, but not since the cap battery change - I use fully passive ships when not cap escalating anyways. I personally have solo'd c3s in a Hyperion, without issues. The guy above me must suck with drone skills. His domi fit is going to get him killed someday, far sooner than using the Hyperion. I don't see many in this thread advising anyone to run solo. The OP asked about ships that can solo. I even linked a KM to show a fit that CAN run solo fine, but also to illustrate it is a gank waiting to happen. learn2read. You must not know Roime. I'm sure his drone skills are fine. And he can afford to lose that domi. You could lose 2 of those domis for the price of 1.5 Hyperion hulls. And there is no need for a fully passive fit in a C3 or a C4 for that matter. I don't think anyone soloing c3s is hurt by the isk loss as a result of a gank, perhaps the KM though. You've obviously never killed a 2bil isk nighthawk soloing a C3. HTFU!...for the children!
Inkarr Hashur Sine Nobilitatis 280	Posted - 2013.03.22 19:54:00 - [41] - Quote Lenier Chenal wrote: Derath Ellecon wrote: Lenier Chenal wrote: Derath Ellecon wrote: Helene Chenal wrote: You'd be better off in a tech 2 blaster Hyperion IMHO So far all of your advise in this thread has been just bad. You should just stop. You've even admitted you haven't even run C3 sites in forever. And not since the neut change. Advising someone to run c3s solo is the original bad piece of advice. You should stop being a scrub. I've ran them since the neut change, but not since the cap battery change - I use fully passive ships when not cap escalating anyways. I personally have solo'd c3s in a Hyperion, without issues. The guy above me must suck with drone skills. His domi fit is going to get him killed someday, far sooner than using the Hyperion. I don't see many in this thread advising anyone to run solo. The OP asked about ships that can solo. I even linked a KM to show a fit that CAN run solo fine, but also to illustrate it is a gank waiting to happen. learn2read. You must not know Roime. I'm sure his drone skills are fine. And he can afford to lose that domi. You could lose 2 of those domis for the price of 1.5 Hyperion hulls. And there is no need for a fully passive fit in a C3 or a C4 for that matter. I don't think anyone soloing c3s is hurt by the isk loss as a result of a gank, perhaps the KM though. You say this while in your previous post call someone a scrub for answering a simple question posed by OP about sololing C3 content, and then in that very same post wave your e-peen about soloing C3 content in a hyperion. So...you're the scrub? I can't even figure out what you are trying to say or prove. I'll just remind you no one is ever impressed by e-peen waving.
Lenier Chenal Anomalous Existence Existential Anxiety 24	Posted - 2013.03.22 20:58:00 - [42] - Quote Mr Kidd wrote: You've obviously never killed a 2bil isk nighthawk soloing a C3. I've killed many ships worth far more than that doing all kinds of weird **** in c3s and lower.
Lenier Chenal Anomalous Existence Existential Anxiety 24	Posted - 2013.03.22 21:01:00 - [43] - Quote Inkarr Hashur wrote: You say this while in your previous post call someone a scrub for answering a simple question posed by OP about sololing C3 content, and then in that very same post wave your e-peen about soloing C3 content in a hyperion. So...you're the scrub? I can't even figure out what you are trying to say or prove. I'll just remind you no one is ever impressed by e-peen waving. Laughinggirls.jpg
Roime Shiva Furnace 2316	Posted - 2013.03.23 10:52:00 - [44] - Quote Lenier Chenal wrote: Advising someone to run c3s solo is the original bad piece of advice. You should stop being a scrub. I've ran them since the neut change, but not since the cap battery change - I use fully passive ships when not cap escalating anyways. I personally have solo'd c3s in a Hyperion, without issues. The guy above me must suck with drone skills. His domi fit is going to get him killed someday, far sooner than using the Hyperion. It's true that running sites really alone in any wormhole is unadvisable, but standard safety precautions were outside the scope of this thread. FWIW I ran my first C3s two years ago and I feel quite confident in this environment. Thanks for your concerns about my drone skills, I do indeed have a few still at IV, haven't bothered maxing the non-Gallente specs. Engineering a Gallente T1 C3 solo ship is just a pet project of mine, I don't accept the status quo of "Drake/T3 or go home" and I'm determined to make it work. Currently I regard a sentry Domi massively better for C3s (RR Domi pair + Rapier is pretty much the holy grail of C3s as what comes to efficiency) than a Hyperion, which suffers from damage projection issues along with weak drones. -á- All I really wanted was to build a castle among the stars -
Narzis No Mutants Allowed pwn-O-graphy 22	Posted - 2013.03.25 11:19:00 - [45] - Quote You can solo C3 anomalies in many ships, including tengu and legion. These are the most common way but not the only ones. If you have the money and the balls, grab the "big boys". No tengu or legion can finish sites as fast as a Machariel or Vargur, but you can make a try with other marauders and pirate/faction battleships too. Of course these ships are expensive (if you can't pimp them, dont fly them), but flying these are a lot of fun and you can make isk faster. How I look like when I win a fight? https://dl.dropbox.com/u/32571986/out-2.gif
Kalel Nimrott EG CORP Talocan United 210	Posted - 2013.03.25 11:28:00 - [46] - Quote Roime wrote: Lenier Chenal wrote: Advising someone to run c3s solo is the original bad piece of advice. You should stop being a scrub. I've ran them since the neut change, but not since the cap battery change - I use fully passive ships when not cap escalating anyways. I personally have solo'd c3s in a Hyperion, without issues. The guy above me must suck with drone skills. His domi fit is going to get him killed someday, far sooner than using the Hyperion. It's true that running sites really alone in any wormhole is unadvisable, but standard safety precautions were outside the scope of this thread. FWIW I ran my first C3s two years ago and I feel quite confident in this environment. Thanks for your concerns about my drone skills, I do indeed have a few still at IV, haven't bothered maxing the non-Gallente specs. Engineering a Gallente T1 C3 solo ship is just a pet project of mine, I don't accept the status quo of "Drake/T3 or go home" and I'm determined to make it work. Currently I regard a sentry Domi massively better for C3s (RR Domi pair + Rapier is pretty much the holy grail of C3s as what comes to efficiency) than a Hyperion, which suffers from damage projection issues along with weak drones. How much time does it takes you to do each anomaly? (its being so long that I forgot their names :) )
Roime Shiva Furnace 2343	Posted - 2013.03.25 15:57:00 - [47] - Quote It took 20 minutes to do Outposts, pretty much the same as a solo Tengu. I'll post more experiences when I continue with testing. -á- All I really wanted was to build a castle among the stars -
Inkarr Hashur Sine Nobilitatis 291	Posted - 2013.03.25 19:00:00 - [48] - Quote You can easily fit a 100MN afterburner on a legion, anyone ever try sites that way? To maintain decent speed under webs, or to get into orbit around a sleeper BS and avoid most of the DPS on the field. I realize this is what the HAM subsystem is more suited to but I want to see if one could at least attempt to do it with pulse, and just turn off the AB when needed. I'd go and test it myself but the test server still hasn't mirrored.
Lenier Chenal Anomalous Existence Existential Anxiety 28	Posted - 2013.03.26 13:41:00 - [49] - Quote Rokh actually is doable as well, it can tank the sites passively even.
Freddie Merrcury Fukushima Daiichi Electric Power Co. 0	Posted - 2013.03.27 10:05:00 - [50] - Quote Lenier Chenal wrote: Rokh actually is doable as well, it can tank the sites passively even. I would love to see your fit. Rokh has a special place in my heart.
Cipio Alduin Strategic Tactics And Recon Academy Strategic Tactics And Recon Corporate Alliance 8	Posted - 2013.03.27 19:20:00 - [51] - Quote The best bet is to run in groups. It's a lot more fun and less chances of you being ganked.
Johnson 1044 Johnson Organic Produce 6	Posted - 2013.03.31 04:55:00 - [52] - Quote I use Tengus but the other day I was observing a Legion running C3 sites solo and he was clearing them fast. I was impressed. I don't know his fit but I couldn't have done it faster in my Tengu.
Xen Solarus Inner 5phere 319	Posted - 2013.03.31 13:49:00 - [53] - Quote I'd personally recommend a T3 cruiser, for survivalbility and ability to clear the sites relatively fast. I can be done in lesser ships, but it can take a while! Though my biggest advice is to make sure to stay alligned. Those combat sites can be scanned down just using the ship scanner, and the patient pirate will warp between them in a covert ship till he finds you, giving you no-warning of his presence from probes or ships on the D-scanner. The only chance you have to catch him there is the short window when he firsts jumps into the hole. Post with your main, like a BOSS!
Johnson 1044 Johnson Organic Produce 6	Posted - 2013.03.31 16:39:00 - [54] - Quote Xen Solarus wrote: Those combat sites can be scanned down just using the ship scanner, and the patient pirate will warp between them in a covert ship till he finds you, giving you no-warning of his presence from probes or ships on the D-scanner. It's much easier than that. All you have to do is use your system map and a 5 degree dscan aligned to the anoms and you'll find them in seconds.
Inkarr Hashur Sine Nobilitatis 299	Posted - 2013.04.01 14:05:00 - [55] - Quote Lenier Chenal wrote: Inkarr Hashur wrote: You say this while in your previous post call someone a scrub for answering a simple question posed by OP about sololing C3 content, and then in that very same post wave your e-peen about soloing C3 content in a hyperion. So...you're the scrub? I can't even figure out what you are trying to say or prove. I'll just remind you no one is ever impressed by e-peen waving. Laughinggirls.jpg Oh hey somehow I missed this. Coolmemearrows.gif.tif.png

Pages: 1 [2] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

Copyright © 2006-2025, Chribba - OMG Labs. All Rights Reserved. - perf 0,05s, ref 20250913/0421
EVE-Online™ and Eve imagery © CCP.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.