EVE Search - We're going to Mars, it takes just 30 days!

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

We're going to Mars, it takes just 30 days!

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Athena Maldoran Special Nymphs On A Mission 1042	Posted - 2013.03.26 16:13:00 - [1] - Quote Nasa's new fusion drive!!
ElQuirko Jester Syndicate WHY so Seri0Us 1161	Posted - 2013.03.26 16:16:00 - [2] - Quote Yep, I know some of those words. CISPA - Readin' your secret corptheft mails since 2012
Athena Maldoran Special Nymphs On A Mission 1082	Posted - 2013.03.26 16:17:00 - [3] - Quote ElQuirko wrote: Yep, I know some of those words.
Doc Fury Furious Enterprises 1244	Posted - 2013.03.26 16:23:00 - [4] - Quote ------> Out of Pod Experience The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'no.'
Athena Maldoran Special Nymphs On A Mission 1082	Posted - 2013.03.26 16:24:00 - [5] - Quote Going to mars would be an out of pod expirience, yes!
Slymah 33 RD Rebel Alliance of New Eden 71	Posted - 2013.03.26 16:31:00 - [6] - Quote You first.
Athena Maldoran Special Nymphs On A Mission 1082	Posted - 2013.03.26 16:34:00 - [7] - Quote Slymah wrote: You first. Only if you fund me
Alice Saki Suddenly Spaced Out Suddenly Spaceships. 41309	Posted - 2013.03.26 16:35:00 - [8] - Quote Can I Come!?!??! Saede GÖÑ We Remember ThGÖÑnks Zimmy
Athena Maldoran Special Nymphs On A Mission 1101	Posted - 2013.03.26 16:41:00 - [9] - Quote Alice Saki wrote: Can I Come!?!??! Its me and you and a huge rocket babe
baltec1 Bat Country 5732	Posted - 2013.03.26 16:45:00 - [10] - Quote If the moon is made of cheese does this mean mars is made of snickers?

Unsuccessful At Everything The Troll Bridge 2908	Posted - 2013.03.26 17:26:00 - [11] - Quote baltec1 wrote: If the moon is made of cheese does this mean mars is made of snickers? Strawberry Quik. *Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings?*
Surfin's PlunderBunny Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic 9824	Posted - 2013.03.26 17:30:00 - [12] - Quote We should just blow up mars so people can stop wasting money on this crap "Little ginger moron" ~David Hasselhoff-á
Sergeant Acht Scultz School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State 698	Posted - 2013.03.26 17:31:00 - [13] - Quote Athena Maldoran wrote: Nasa's new fusion drive!! Humans are amazing. I love most of them, just not all removed inappropriate ASCII art signature - CCP Eterne
Domina Trix McKNOBBLER DRINKING CLAN 23	Posted - 2013.03.26 17:58:00 - [14] - Quote Athena Maldoran wrote: Nasa's new fusion drive!! I hope they remembered the brakes Two of the defining characteristics of a carebear are wanting other players to play the way the carebear wants and whining on the forums for the game to change when they don't. Yet I see more threads on these forums from gankers than I do miners whining about wanting the game changed to suit them.
LHA Tarawa Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic 539	Posted - 2013.03.26 18:12:00 - [15] - Quote The largest issue with putting humans on mars, then bringing them back, is not the travel between Earth and Mars. It is getting the people back off of Mars back into space. The moon has 16% the gravity of Earth (2.4km/sec escape velocity) and virtually no atmosphere, so it took relatively little thrust to lift the lander module back into orbit. Mars has 38% earth's gravity (5km/sec escape velocity), and it does have an atmosphere (even if minuscule when compared to Earth). Unless we can figure out how to land, fuel, and launch a pretty significant rocket ship from Mars, then anyone that goes is going to have a heck-a time getting back off of Mars.
Arronicus vintas industries Mistakes Were Made. 401	Posted - 2013.03.26 18:33:00 - [16] - Quote Athena Maldoran wrote: Alice Saki wrote: Can I Come!?!??! Its me and you and a huge rocket babe Saw that one already. Vibe was too loud and half-ruined the whole movie.
Athena Maldoran Special Nymphs On A Mission 1130	Posted - 2013.03.26 18:47:00 - [17] - Quote Domina Trix wrote: Athena Maldoran wrote: Nasa's new fusion drive!! I hope they remembered the brakes At the speeds we're talking, its a challange to slow down indeed. "SPACEBRAKES"
Athena Maldoran Special Nymphs On A Mission 1130	Posted - 2013.03.26 18:47:00 - [18] - Quote LHA Tarawa wrote: The largest issue with putting humans on mars, then bringing them back, is not the travel between Earth and Mars. It is getting the people back off of Mars back into space. The moon has 16% the gravity of Earth (2.4km/sec escape velocity) and virtually no atmosphere, so it took relatively little thrust to lift the lander module back into orbit. Mars has 38% earth's gravity (5km/sec escape velocity), and it does have an atmosphere (even if minuscule when compared to Earth). Unless we can figure out how to land, fuel, and launch a pretty significant rocket ship from Mars, then anyone that goes is going to have a heck-a time getting back off of Mars. We could drop down a space elevator?
Iosue Black Sky Hipsters 170	Posted - 2013.03.26 18:56:00 - [19] - Quote NASA Guy wrote: Several low-mass, magnetically-driven metal liners are inductively driven to converge radially and axially and form a thick blanket surrounding the target plasmoid and compress the plasmoid to fusion conditions. Virtually all of the radiant, neutron and particle energy from the plasma is absorbed by the encapsulating, metal blanket thereby isolating the spacecraft from the fusion process and eliminating the need for large radiator mass. This energy, in addition to the intense Ohmic heating at peak magnetic field compression, is adequate to vaporize and ionize the metal blanket. can someone explain this part me? i need to work on my space nerd-fu.
Athena Maldoran Special Nymphs On A Mission 1134	Posted - 2013.03.26 18:58:00 - [20] - Quote Iosue wrote: NASA Guy wrote: Several low-mass, magnetically-driven metal liners are inductively driven to converge radially and axially and form a thick blanket surrounding the target plasmoid and compress the plasmoid to fusion conditions. Virtually all of the radiant, neutron and particle energy from the plasma is absorbed by the encapsulating, metal blanket thereby isolating the spacecraft from the fusion process and eliminating the need for large radiator mass. This energy, in addition to the intense Ohmic heating at peak magnetic field compression, is adequate to vaporize and ionize the metal blanket. can someone explain this part me? i need to work on my space nerd-fu. machine > energy > speed.

Iosue Black Sky Hipsters 170	Posted - 2013.03.26 19:00:00 - [21] - Quote LHA Tarawa wrote: The largest issue with putting humans on mars, then bringing them back, is not the travel between Earth and Mars. It is getting the people back off of Mars back into space. The moon has 16% the gravity of Earth (2.4km/sec escape velocity) and virtually no atmosphere, so it took relatively little thrust to lift the lander module back into orbit. Mars has 38% earth's gravity (5km/sec escape velocity), and it does have an atmosphere (even if minuscule when compared to Earth). Unless we can figure out how to land, fuel, and launch a pretty significant rocket ship from Mars, then anyone that goes is going to have a heck-a time getting back off of Mars. i don't follow. if we've mastered getting stuff off earth, which has higher gravity that mars, what's the problem with getting stuff off mars?
Spondoo Lix University of Caille Gallente Federation 2	Posted - 2013.03.26 19:03:00 - [22] - Quote It means they squeeze the rocket fuel in a vice until a nuclear reaction occurs and the whole apparatus just pumps out energy.
Athena Maldoran Special Nymphs On A Mission 1134	Posted - 2013.03.26 19:03:00 - [23] - Quote I only know, we won't know before we tried!
Mr Kidd Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 1094	Posted - 2013.03.26 19:24:00 - [24] - Quote LHA Tarawa wrote: The largest issue with putting humans on mars, then bringing them back, is not the travel between Earth and Mars. It is getting the people back off of Mars back into space. The moon has 16% the gravity of Earth (2.4km/sec escape velocity) and virtually no atmosphere, so it took relatively little thrust to lift the lander module back into orbit. Mars has 38% earth's gravity (5km/sec escape velocity), and it does have an atmosphere (even if minuscule when compared to Earth). Unless we can figure out how to land, fuel, and launch a pretty significant rocket ship from Mars, then anyone that goes is going to have a heck-a time getting back off of Mars. Ok let me simplify this concept for you. Earth. Small ship from Earth rendezvous with big ship in orbit. Big ship go boom boom to Mar. Mars. Small ship undocks. Small ship lands on Mars. Astronauts do stuff. Small ship launches from Mars. Small ship rendezvous with big ship. Big ship go boom boom back to Earth. We've done this before, about 40yrs ago. Assuming same weight for the M.E.M. as the L.E.M. then they only need to provide slightly more than 22% more thrust to overcome the additional gravity + aerodynamic drag. Chances are, though, the M.E.M. would need to be significantly more robust. But then, they could use aerodynamic forces to their advantage lifting off the surface. A runway would not necessarily be required utilizing VTOL in the low gravity environment. With the advances in computer controlled flight, VTOL in low gravity is trivial. HTFU!...for the children!
Athena Maldoran Special Nymphs On A Mission 1151	Posted - 2013.03.26 19:31:00 - [25] - Quote Yarr, we're going to mars!!! Hoist the sails!!!
Bizzaro Stormy MurphDog Homowners 53	Posted - 2013.03.26 19:58:00 - [26] - Quote LHA Tarawa wrote: The largest issue with putting humans on mars, then bringing them back, is not the travel between Earth and Mars. It is getting the people back off of Mars back into space. The moon has 16% the gravity of Earth (2.4km/sec escape velocity) and virtually no atmosphere, so it took relatively little thrust to lift the lander module back into orbit. Mars has 38% earth's gravity (5km/sec escape velocity), and it does have an atmosphere (even if minuscule when compared to Earth). Unless we can figure out how to land, fuel, and launch a pretty significant rocket ship from Mars, then anyone that goes is going to have a heck-a time getting back off of Mars. Don't know why you're quoting escape velocities, us humans design craft that know how to accelerate. Also, colonies.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 1099	Posted - 2013.03.26 20:10:00 - [27] - Quote Athena Maldoran wrote: Nasa's new fusion drive!! Should be fun if the ship is unfortunate to enough do a 'Challenger' shortly after take-off. This is not a signature.
KuroVolt The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance 48	Posted - 2013.03.26 20:13:00 - [28] - Quote This better not be an april fools joke!
Solstice Project Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic 3012	Posted - 2013.03.26 20:14:00 - [29] - Quote It's not even done yet ...
TharOkha 0asis Group 521	Posted - 2013.03.26 20:52:00 - [30] - Quote Iosue wrote: NASA Guy wrote: Several low-mass, magnetically-driven metal liners are inductively driven to converge radially and axially and form a thick blanket surrounding the target plasmoid and compress the plasmoid to fusion conditions. Virtually all of the radiant, neutron and particle energy from the plasma is absorbed by the encapsulating, metal blanket thereby isolating the spacecraft from the fusion process and eliminating the need for large radiator mass. This energy, in addition to the intense Ohmic heating at peak magnetic field compression, is adequate to vaporize and ionize the metal blanket. can someone explain this part me? i need to work on my space nerd-fu. You need to train nuclear and plasma physics to LVL-5 GÇ£If reality can destroy the dream, why shouldn't the dream destroy reality?GÇ¥



Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.