| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Nexus Day
Lustrevik Trade and Travel Bureau
506
   |
Posted - 2013.04.05 00:08:00 -
[1] - Quote
Just thumbing through the CSM candidates and I will definitely not vote for:
1) Candidates from big blocs- they don't need my vote.
2) Male candidates with female avatars- genaral principle.
3) People from non-english speaking nations posting in English- you are already bowing to the will of CCP.
4) Canadians- what's that all aboot.
5) Unshaven avatars- I want my CSM's clean cut.
What disqualifies a CSM candidate in your eyes?
This thread has so much content it may be 'Thread of the Year' and it is only January.
|
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
811
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 00:14:00 -
[2] - Quote
For CCP accusations of racist ideas does I'm guessing more due to bad publicity then the veracity that he'd really have a problem sitting with others in honest conversation.
But for me I don't vote for any damn Gallente... they all stink of moldy cheese 
Ripard Teg-á for CSM 8
Disclaimer: CCP Bias is a fictional character. In case that some CCP Bias does exist,-áis he an "ex"-Goon? |
Sadie Eriker
Savage Socks And Shoes
Fuzzy Nut Attack Squirrels
7
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 00:18:00 -
[3] - Quote
I feel like this could turn into a big game of 'Guess Who?' as to whom you did vote for.  |
Setaceous
Nexus Prima
16
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 00:20:00 -
[4] - Quote
Anybody with a one-sided, myopic viewpoint. |
Xen Solarus
Inner 5phere
326
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 00:21:00 -
[5] - Quote
Nexus Day wrote:
What disqualifies a CSM candidate in your eyes?
When they try to get someone out-of-game to commit suicide, i'd say. 
That, and plain old lying to your face.
Post with your main, like a BOSS! |
Kindred Wolf
Future's Inc.
9
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 00:26:00 -
[6] - Quote
1) Sanity - All candidates must be starkraving nappywearing bonkers to get my vote. |
Grayson Cole
Providence Guard
Templis Dragonaors
37
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 00:28:00 -
[7] - Quote
Anyone named Malcanis.
Caldari Militia Gÿ£G£½GÿP |
Frying Doom
2146
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 00:37:00 -
[8] - Quote
Kindred Wolf wrote:1) Sanity - All candidates must be starkraving nappywearing bonkers to get my vote.
You voted for me, how kind.
I know I am not on the list of candidates but just get out a marker pen and write on your monitor, then I will get it
Vote Now My recommendations are:-á 1.James Arget 2.Ayeson 3.Nathan Jameson 4.Cipreh
5.Chitsa Jason 6. Malcanis 7. Mike Azariah 8. Ripard Teg 9. Mangala Solaris 10. Ali Aras |
Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
50
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 01:11:00 -
[9] - Quote
1. Ability to communicate, and not like a mouthbreather.
2. Is independent enough to look at the bigger picture, not painting him/herself into a corner of personal biases and worse.
3. Mature. In attitude and manners. S/he is representing mixed company and many viewpoints. If s/he can't be diplomatic even ingame, s/he isn't going to be much working as an representative.
4. Has worked with famous people before, so their first meeting with CCP they're not a doe eyed fan.
5. Knows what's practical to work for (we all want pies in the sky, but it isn't realistic), and wise enough to know why.
6. Isn't a bought and paid for hooker (has no internal compass, will vote for what popular, or especially, what he's paid to vote upon).
A good candidate that does the job s/he is running to do, and actually capable to do it.
Anything else disqualifies.
If I wanted the tomfoolery as representatives I'd ask the congress or senate to play EvE.
"In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."
~George Orwell
|
Fredfredbug4
Eve Defence Force
Tribal Band
649
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 01:13:00 -
[10] - Quote
Anyone that is too one sided really or uses sleezy/dishonorable methods to get ahead.
I accidentally my assets, is this bad?-á |
Karl Hobb
Stellar Ore Refinery and Crematorium
1475
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 01:15:00 -
[11] - Quote
Ace Uoweme wrote:1. Ability to communicate, and not like a mouthbreather.
2. Is independent enough to look at the bigger picture, not painting him/herself into a corner of personal biases and worse.
3. Mature. In attitude and manners. S/he is representing mixed company and many viewpoints. If s/he can't be diplomatic even ingame, s/he isn't going to be much working as an representative.
4. Has worked with famous people before, so their first meeting with CCP they're not a doe eyed fan.
5. Knows what's practical to work for (we all want pies in the sky, but it isn't realistic), and wise enough to know why.
6. Isn't a bought and paid for hooker (has no internal compass, will vote for what popular, or especially, what he's paid to vote upon).
I have to agree, all these things would disqualify a candidate in my eyes.
Professional bad guys were unfortunately not available so instead they sent me. |
Frank Doberman
7th Church of the Apocalyptic Lawnmower
9
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 01:48:00 -
[12] - Quote
1. Being vegetarian.
2. Anyone using terms like 'mining', 'industry', or 'minerals' in their campaign blurb
3. Anyone who I suspect may have had a Drake/Raven/Navy Raven in their personal hangar at some point.
4. Weirdos who don't wear stiletto heels.
5. Coming across like you genuinely treat the CSM seriously and actually believe you're going to somehow 'save' EvE. |
Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
50
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 01:54:00 -
[13] - Quote
Karl Hobb wrote:I have to agree, all these things would disqualify a candidate in my eyes.
We need a French Revolution so all the bozos and their liasons can race to the guillotine.
Best election ever! 
"In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."
~George Orwell
|
Katran Luftschreck
Royal Ammatar Engineering Corps
1293
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 01:57:00 -
[14] - Quote
Setaceous wrote:Anybody with a one-sided, myopic viewpoint.
So in other words... you're not voting? 
Live Events are neither. |
Jake Warbird
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
2342
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 01:58:00 -
[15] - Quote
Frank Doberman wrote:
3. Anyone who I suspect may have had a Drake in their personal hangar at some point.
Okay gl with that. |
Frank Doberman
7th Church of the Apocalyptic Lawnmower
9
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 02:03:00 -
[16] - Quote
Jake Warbird wrote:Frank Doberman wrote:
3. Anyone who I suspect may have had a Drake in their personal hangar at some point.
Okay gl with that.
If it was in the 'reprocessing' pool then I consider the position negotiable.
Everyone is allowed to make a mistake here and there. Hell, I even remember flying a Moa once! |
Setaceous
Nexus Prima
17
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 02:05:00 -
[17] - Quote
Katran Luftschreck wrote:Setaceous wrote:Anybody with a one-sided, myopic viewpoint. So in other words... you're not voting?
There are three candidates that have more balanced views than the more popular ones. |
Destoya
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion
68
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 04:24:00 -
[18] - Quote
Frank Doberman wrote:
3. Anyone who I suspect may have had a Drake/Raven/Navy Raven in their personal hangar at some point.
No hating on the herocat torpedo CNR allowed
|
Mocam
EVE University
Ivy League
255
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 05:11:00 -
[19] - Quote
There was one question on Diedra's list that I really felt to be a disqualifier if backed.
About the new CREST API and letting it update market orders from outside the game.
So the #1 safest activity to get into in this game, the one that risks absolutely the least should now be giving the most easily exploitable bot tools? ...
CCP hits issues tracking and finding bots that use the game client. How the hell do you expect them to find bots that can be run on smartphones on around to any type of computer *WITHOUT* the EVE client loaded at all?!?!?
Running bots as a market would be *THE* way things were done and I don't see why the hell we should reward the safest, most profitable portions of this community with the ability to mess with the environment, without even having to log-on.
Yeah, that one hacked me off seeing candidates in support of it. "Let's give market manipulators the easiest bots to run so they don't even have to log in the game to mess things up!".
I'd be more into requiring adjustments to market orders having to be done from a pod orbiting a station than this lame "suggestion".
A workable one would be to allow update of the skill queue. *THAT* isn't messing with the environment but this? This messes with the market and that we don't need to make any easier. |
rodyas
tie fighters inc
1112
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 05:46:00 -
[20] - Quote
Knowing how to read.
Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne |
Abrazzar
Vardaugas Family
1225
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 06:35:00 -
[21] - Quote
1.) Candidacy.
Mining Overhaul
Nothing changed since 2008. |
Super spikinator
Hegemonous Conscripts
Hegemonous Pandorum
126
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 06:38:00 -
[22] - Quote
That they are male. We NEED more female representation on the CSM. |
Lugia3
Pirates Incorporated
367
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 06:40:00 -
[23] - Quote
Everything.
They will never take my vote!
Yarr |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
8467
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 06:50:00 -
[24] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:For CCP accusations of racist ideas does I'm guessing more due to bad publicity then the veracity that he'd really have a problem sitting with others in honest conversation.
Don't forget that the other CSMs might have a problem working with him.
Please vote for me for CSM8-áhere
My recommended voting list |
Eight Two
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
88
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 07:26:00 -
[25] - Quote
Only one point really: coming up with a clear point of focus rather than the usual "I will listen to the players" this and "I will represent everyone" that.
It's a job after all, not coming up with specifics for whatever reason does not leave a very professional impression all in my opinion.. |
ACE McFACE
Radical Astronauts Plundering Eve
Hopeless Addiction
1167
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 07:38:00 -
[26] - Quote
That one guy that only had "0.0/PvP candidate" as his description, put a little effort into it! (Yes I know theres a full forum post but still.)
DUST514 isn't on PC because CCP wants 2 different communities influencing each other, not people tabbing out to give themselves Orbital Strikes. (Also they don't want to cannibalise their existing playerbase) |
Galaxy Pig
New Order Logistics
CODE.
717
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 07:42:00 -
[27] - Quote
Being a proponent of typical backwards carebear ideas like "ISK-tanking" and "fairness". |
pussnheels
The Fiction Factory
1080
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 08:25:00 -
[28] - Quote
the fact that less than 20% of all voters will actually vote
disqualifies all of them
I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire |
Karadion
Vasilkovsky Interstellar
Goonswarm Federation
738
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 08:28:00 -
[29] - Quote
High-sec pubbies. |
TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
1174
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 08:31:00 -
[30] - Quote
Personally, anyone who mentions subscriptions or revenue.
The CSMs job is to represent the players and help gameplay, not to be concerned with CCP's bottom line. CCP can do that, I'm sure they hire people for that exact purpose. We don't need people selling out the players and fun in order to do that. |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |