Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Nova Satar
Mind Games. Suddenly Spaceships.
107
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 17:22:00 -
[1] - Quote
Seriously CCP, can you STOP re-releasing supposed "limited edition" ships everytime you want to squeeze for an extra buck.
What is the point of running a promotion stating "only 1000 ships made" if 6 months later you start giving them out again. It completely detracts from the whole point.
Release a batch, close production, and never make them again. This way people will have an incentive to actually try and get hold of them. |

flakeys
Arkham Innovations Paper Tiger Coalition
966
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 17:26:00 -
[2] - Quote
Nova Satar wrote:Seriously CCP, can you STOP re-releasing supposed "limited edition" ships everytime you want to squeeze for an extra buck.
What is the point of running a promotion stating "only 1000 ships made" if 6 months later you start giving them out again. It completely detracts from the whole point.
Release a batch, close production, and never make them again. This way people will have an incentive to actually try and get hold of them.
But then they'll have to be creative and like make new ships and all 
We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
|

Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
2396
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 17:37:00 -
[3] - Quote
Nova Satar wrote:Seriously CCP, can you STOP re-releasing supposed "limited edition" ships everytime you want to squeeze for an extra buck.
What is the point of running a promotion stating "only 1000 ships made" if 6 months later you start giving them out again. It completely detracts from the whole point.
Release a batch, close production, and never make them again. This way people will have an incentive to actually try and get hold of them. What did I miss this time?
Please give more info on any recent reissues.
Mr Epeen  There are 86,400 seconds in a day. You just saved one of them by typing 'u' instead of 'you'.-á Congratulations, dumbass! |

iskflakes
389
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 17:48:00 -
[4] - Quote
The re-releasing of limited edition items is extremely frustrating to rare item collectors such as myself.
First the ishukone shirts, and the 3 months it took for an official CCP reimbursement. Then then women's red/black coats (no reimbursement provided). Then the echelon, sansha codebreaker, primae. Then the snowball launchers that got needlessly deleted to make room for the new festival launcher (destroying hundreds of billions in rare collections). Today -- CCP act to destroy the value of these rare destroyers.
CCP, I don't give a damn what you choose to release or not, but you need to tell us whether an item is actually special edition, or whether it's just a limited release. Right now the echelon and these catalysts are in the "special edition" section of the forums which strongly implied that no more of them would ever be created. At the very least there is huge ambiguity here.
I don't want to hear about how you can't give us guaranteed -- you can. It would be trivial for you to come out and say that items X, Y and Z would not be re-released. Can I be certain that alliance tournament ships won't be re-released in a future buddy programme? Can I be certain the state issue ships won't be given away as part of some ******** PLEX promotion? Can I be certain I won't wake up to find all players have received T2 BPOs as part of a holiday gift?
CCP, there is no need for this uncertainty. Your current approach is destructive towards the style of play of all item collectors across New Eden. - |

Nova Satar
Mind Games. Suddenly Spaceships.
108
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 17:54:00 -
[5] - Quote
the post above sums everything up.
The destroyers are just todays example, they have released plenty of special and limited editions over time but then closed production runs thus making them a collectable. Now today announce they are suddenly giving out more as bloody buddy program rewards.
|

War Kitten
Panda McLegion
1863
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 17:57:00 -
[6] - Quote
The first release had black borders and more rounded edges on the pixels.
The new ones are all foil bordered pixels.
If you were a true collector you could tell the difference.
I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all. |

Nova Satar
Mind Games. Suddenly Spaceships.
110
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 17:58:00 -
[7] - Quote
War Kitten wrote:The first release had black borders and more rounded edges on the pixels.
The new ones are all foil bordered pixels.
If you were a true collector you could tell the difference.
Im not actually a collector, but i just feel annoyed on behalf of the people who are when i keep seeing it happen.
|

War Kitten
Panda McLegion
1863
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 18:04:00 -
[8] - Quote
Nova Satar wrote:War Kitten wrote:The first release had black borders and more rounded edges on the pixels.
The new ones are all foil bordered pixels.
If you were a true collector you could tell the difference. Im not actually a collector, but i just feel annoyed on behalf of the people who are when i keep seeing it happen.
It wasn't specifically directed at you either, your post just snuck in before mine did while I was writing.
I understand collectors items that you can invest in and take down to the local comic/card store or pawnbroker ... I have a bit of trouble taking in-game collectors items too seriously though.
I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all. |

Nova Satar
Mind Games. Suddenly Spaceships.
113
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 18:08:00 -
[9] - Quote
War Kitten wrote:Nova Satar wrote:War Kitten wrote:The first release had black borders and more rounded edges on the pixels.
The new ones are all foil bordered pixels.
If you were a true collector you could tell the difference. Im not actually a collector, but i just feel annoyed on behalf of the people who are when i keep seeing it happen. It wasn't specifically directed at you either, your post just snuck in before mine did while I was writing. I understand collectors items that you can invest in and take down to the local comic/card store or pawnbroker ... I have a bit of trouble taking in-game collectors items too seriously though.
It's one of the biggest isk activities in eve, players pay hundreds of billions for the rarest items and get great enjoyment out of it. There are thousands of items which some can prove very tricky to get hold of, it makes for a cool dynamic and very interesting trades.
People have huge interest in ships like the Guardian Vexor of which i think only 1 still exists? And the Luxry Opus yacht perhaps? (somebody im sure will correct me). This only happens because back when they were released CCP were more interested in a diverse game, than they were in flogging limited editions ships down the drain to get a few more trial accounts in the bag.
Todays rare ships would never have reached this point if they kept getting rolled out over and over as marketing promo tat |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
13575
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 18:11:00 -
[10] - Quote
Nova Satar wrote:What is the point of running a promotion stating "only 1000 ships made" if 6 months later you start giving them out again. Have they ever run such a promotion, though?
iskflakes wrote:First the ishukone shirts, and the 3 months it took for an official CCP reimbursement. Then then women's red/black coats (no reimbursement provided). Then the echelon, sansha codebreaker, primae. Then the snowball launchers that got needlessly deleted to make room for the new festival launcher (destroying hundreds of billions in rare collections). Lesson provided: special-event items are not GÇ£limited editionsGÇ¥. Lesson learned: none.
Quote:Right now the echelon and these catalysts are in the "special edition" section of the forums-ámarket which strongly implied that no more of them would ever be created. No. It just implies that they're not something that's not produced in-game.
Quote:Can I be certain that alliance tournament ships won't be re-released in a future buddy programme? Can I be certain the state issue ships won't be given away as part of some ******** PLEX promotion? Can I be certain I won't wake up to find all players have received T2 BPOs as part of a holiday gift? No. Vote Malcanis for CSM8. |
|

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
4100
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 18:18:00 -
[11] - Quote
I'd be fairly peeved if they suddenly made the Interbus Shuttle available for "PLEX".
Us geeks tend to be collectors of things, and CCP is geek as well, so I have a hard time understanding their mindset behind this latest escapade.
It is certainly going to make me rethink things when there is another limited ship available for any reason. There is much to be said in favour of modern journalism. By giving us the opinions of the uneducated, it keeps us in touch with the ignorance of the community.-á-á-á-á - Oscar Wilde |

iskflakes
392
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 18:29:00 -
[12] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Have they ever run such a promotion, though?
Yes, ishukone shirts come to mind.
Tippia wrote:Lesson provided: special-event items are not GÇ£limited editionsGÇ¥. Lesson learned: none.
I'm asking CCP to communicate ahead of time which items are special and which are not. Communicating by giving mixed signals then re-releasing items at random as some kind of "lesson" is not good communication. CCP's current approach marginalizes my style of gameplay, so what's the lesson I'm supposed to take from that? That collecting rare items is not a legitimate occupation in EVE Online?
Tippia wrote:No. It just implies that they're not something that's not produced in-game.
You see "special edition" and think one thing, I see it and think another. My point was this whole system is completely ambiguous, so I'll take this as further evidence of that fact. As I stated before I don't mind what CCP do as long as they make it clear which ships are special and which are not.
Again this is my whole point. I want to invest a huge amount of time in acquiring these rare items, but I can't do it if they get re-released every week. It wouldn't take much for CCP to remove the ambiguity. - |

Mr. Orange
Band of Freelancers
77
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 18:31:00 -
[13] - Quote
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:I'd be fairly peeved if they suddenly made the Interbus Shuttle available for "PLEX".
Us geeks tend to be collectors of things, and CCP is geek as well, so I have a hard time understanding their mindset behind this latest escapade.
It is certainly going to make me rethink things when there is another limited ship available for any reason.
The marketing department doesn't give a **** about your "geek" collections or Ravens that fire lasers at planets.
They just want your green.
 |

Turelus
Caldari Independent Navy Reserve The Fourth District
354
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 18:32:00 -
[14] - Quote
Better yet, stop making limited edition ships which sit and gather dust in hangers.  Lieutenant Turelus
Caldari Independent Navy Reserve
The Fourth District |

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
4100
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 18:32:00 -
[15] - Quote
Mr. Orange wrote:Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:I'd be fairly peeved if they suddenly made the Interbus Shuttle available for "PLEX".
Us geeks tend to be collectors of things, and CCP is geek as well, so I have a hard time understanding their mindset behind this latest escapade.
It is certainly going to make me rethink things when there is another limited ship available for any reason. The marketing department doesn't give a **** about your "geek" collections or Ravens that fire lasers at planets. They just want your green. 
Apparently so. There is much to be said in favour of modern journalism. By giving us the opinions of the uneducated, it keeps us in touch with the ignorance of the community.-á-á-á-á - Oscar Wilde |

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
4100
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 18:34:00 -
[16] - Quote
Turelus wrote:Better yet, stop making limited edition ships which sit and gather dust in hangers. 
They make you angry, bro ? There is much to be said in favour of modern journalism. By giving us the opinions of the uneducated, it keeps us in touch with the ignorance of the community.-á-á-á-á - Oscar Wilde |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
13575
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 18:35:00 -
[17] - Quote
iskflakes wrote:Yes, ishukone shirts come to mind. You mean the people kept calling GÇ£limited editionGÇ¥ without ever showing where they got the idea that it was one?
Quote:'m asking CCP to communicate ahead of time which items are special and which are not. Simple: none of them are. Or wellGǪ sure, some are GǣspecialGǥ in that they will not be produced in-game except for at the very end of days when all other ideas for player retention have been tried.
Quote:You see "special edition" and think one thing, I see it and think another. Guess which one lies closer to historical fact? 
Quote:Again this is my whole point. I want to invest a huge amount of time in acquiring these rare items, but I can't do it if they get re-released every week. And there's absolutely nothing to suggest that they will. They're just not limited editions, but rather your bog-standard promotional/vanity items that people still find a way to collect.
Vote Malcanis for CSM8. |

Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction Whores in space
116
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 18:35:00 -
[18] - Quote
War Kitten wrote:The first release had black borders and more rounded edges on the pixels.
The new ones are all foil bordered pixels.
If you were a true collector you could tell the difference.
Lol magic the Gathering player? :P |

Eli Green
The Arrow Project
605
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 18:48:00 -
[19] - Quote
inb4 this turns into another tippia vs. XXXX thread wumbo |
|

ISD Gallifreyan
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
90

|
Posted - 2013.04.11 18:49:00 -
[20] - Quote
I am also a collector so I appreciate what you are saying, but as long as they do not start being seeded they are still special /limited edition. The risk we take as collector is re-issues and found caches of lost assets. I want a guardian vexor for my collection, but if there's one left it will never happen. If there is a limited re-release I might have the chance, and we might see one used in a tournament! ISD Gallifreyan Ensign Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|
|

Yusef Yeasef Yosef
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
214
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 19:02:00 -
[21] - Quote
Risk should apply to collectables as well.
There is always a risk of some more being found/released, so invest at your own risk. Nothing in eve should be risk free. |

War Kitten
Panda McLegion
1865
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 19:03:00 -
[22] - Quote
Kagura Nikon wrote:War Kitten wrote:The first release had black borders and more rounded edges on the pixels.
The new ones are all foil bordered pixels.
If you were a true collector you could tell the difference. Lol magic the Gathering player? :P
How'd you guess? :)
Spent hundreds on cards, sold them for thousands, bought a rare car. Later, sold the car for more than I paid for it after getting good use out of it. I got good use out of the cards too - won a few prizes in small tournaments.
Somehow I don't see collecting database records in a game world on the same level. If the collectors items had inherent value, like the tournament prize ships or the Guardian Vexor, then you've got something worth isk. Collecting Zephyrs and Primae and the like simply because there aren't a lot of them, despite the fact that they're junk, to me, is silly.
Most collectors items are gimmicks. Words like "special edition" and "limited edition" should be signals that someone is after your money or just wants to make you feel special. Look for real value, not marketing buzzwords.
Anyone want to buy an Echelon?
Didn't think so.
I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all. |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
1119
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 19:17:00 -
[23] - Quote
Eli Green wrote:inb4 this turns into another tippia vs. XXXX thread
^^^ made me smile This is not a signature. |

Holgrak Blacksmith
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
66
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 19:19:00 -
[24] - Quote
I agree, it really annoys me when "limited edition" ships get handed out wholesale. To anyone who claims rare ship collectors need to accept risk too, I put this to you; regular market traders do their thing based on speculation from info released PRIOR to upcoming patches, in pvp we get to look at upcoming patch data then make choices as to which skills to invest in and which ships are going to be hot. But here, ccp, with absolutely no notice, **** collectors out of billions. That's not risk/reward. Today collectors logged on to find several inches of CCP up in their hole. |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
638
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 19:24:00 -
[25] - Quote
Did something recent precipitate this or is this a delayed reaction? |

Jada Maroo
Southern Cross Empire Flying Dangerous
1064
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 19:30:00 -
[26] - Quote
I still remember a time when we were supposed to be able to skin our own ships and CCP hadn't decided to waste all the ship skins for special edition money grabs. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
13575
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 19:32:00 -
[27] - Quote
Holgrak Blacksmith wrote:I agree, it really annoys me when "limited edition" ships get handed out wholesale. GǪbut then again, they've never really done that. Something handed out by the thousands as promotion and event-swag is not GǣlimitedGǥ.
The only ships that could reasonably be considered GÇ£limited editionGÇ¥ are the unique ships of old and the AT ships, all of which have remained unique or AT-exclusive. Vote Malcanis for CSM8. |

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
4100
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 19:39:00 -
[28] - Quote
I'm not gonna say this is a ton of RL money involved or anything.......
But normally a monthly sub costs $14.95 or a $20 PLEX value. I spent $26.00 for a 30 day GTC from a 3rd Party company, which I never otherwise would have used, just expressly to get the Intaki Syndicate Catalyst.
Now they are just being handed out like candy for Buddy Subscriptions.
It's not the end of the world or anything, but it sure will stop me from trusting anything CCP says is limited edition from now on, especially with RL currency involved. There is much to be said in favour of modern journalism. By giving us the opinions of the uneducated, it keeps us in touch with the ignorance of the community.-á-á-á-á - Oscar Wilde |

MrDiao
SUNDERING Goonswarm Federation
14
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 19:44:00 -
[29] - Quote
CCP should just stop releasing the useless limited edition ships at all. As they don't have any practical use(does not help to enhance the game context) and only make few collectors happy, while waste the resource and make many other players unhappy: people will just think "Well those limited issues are only for rich people I would never gotta use it". |

Holgrak Blacksmith
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
68
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 19:53:00 -
[30] - Quote
MrDiao wrote:CCP should just stop releasing the useless limited edition ships at all. As they don't have any practical use(does not help to enhance the game context) and only make few collectors happy, while waste the resource and make many other players unhappy: people will just think "Well those limited issues are only for rich people I would never gotta use it".
Your avatar won't stop looking at my groin. |
|

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
638
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 19:56:00 -
[31] - Quote
MrDiao wrote:CCP should just stop releasing the useless limited edition ships at all. As they don't have any practical use(does not help to enhance the game context) and only make few collectors happy, while waste the resource and make many other players unhappy: people will just think "Well those limited issues are only for rich people I would never gotta use it". Personally if one person having something they will never use makes another person unhappy I'm not sure that is worth considering over the opinions of players who do enjoy them. After all since the ships go unused there is no actual harm or change in gameplay to those that lack them.
And I would imagine it doesn't take too much time to make them since they are intentionally weak or clones of existing cheaper ships and in some cases even use already existing visual assets. |

None ofthe Above
498
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 20:04:00 -
[32] - Quote
Yusef Yeasef Yosef wrote:Risk should apply to collectables as well.
There is always a risk of some more being found/released, so invest at your own risk. Nothing in eve should be risk free.
+1
There are certain classes of limited edition ships that are PROMISED to have a certain run. Tournament ships for example.
Otherwise I think CCP should be free to do additional promotions or what have you at their will.
Collectors are not entitled to have CCP not reuse ships they have not promised to never use again.
You are taking your chances speculating on their value. Vote, you apathetic bastards!-á -> http://community.eveonline.com/community/csm/vote/ CSM 8 Endorsements: Ali Aras, Malcanis, Mike Azaria, Psychotic Monk, Trebor Daehdoow, Ripard Teg |

Garreth Vlox
Shockwave Innovations Shockwave Sovereign Industries
121
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 20:06:00 -
[33] - Quote
Nova Satar wrote:the post above sums everything up.
The destroyers are just todays example, they have released plenty of special and limited editions over time but then closed production runs thus making them a collectable. Now today announce they are suddenly giving out more as buddy program rewards!
it just seems when it comes to draining a few more dollars out the playerbase, anything is possible. Like the guy said above, in 3 years time will they be giving away Adrestias t everyone who buys a pack of 20 plex? probably not, but the point is you can't be sure.
Think back through the history of this game, especially the recent history, why are you surprised that CCP decided to screw over a small part of the player base in a new effort to ***** their out "limited" edition items to make just one more dollar? They were willing to insight a riot among the player base when releasing the micro transaction/walking in station debacle because they wanted to try and attract the WoW/hello kitty online crowd. The LULZ Boat. |

MrDiao
SUNDERING Goonswarm Federation
14
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 20:08:00 -
[34] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote: And I would imagine it doesn't take too much time to make them since they are intentionally weak or clones of existing cheaper ships and in some cases even use already existing visual assets.
Do you include Gnosis, Etana, Echelon , Zephyr , or the pirate noobships? |

Nova Satar
Mind Games. Suddenly Spaceships.
116
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 20:09:00 -
[35] - Quote
Yusef Yeasef Yosef wrote:Risk should apply to collectables as well.
There is always a risk of some more being found/released, so invest at your own risk. Nothing in eve should be risk free.
not really the right kind of risk though..... Devs making changes at a whim? Thats like saying theres risk in PVE is ccp halved rat bounties every now and then |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
639
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 20:29:00 -
[36] - Quote
MrDiao wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote: And I would imagine it doesn't take too much time to make them since they are intentionally weak or clones of existing cheaper ships and in some cases even use already existing visual assets.
Do you include Gnosis, Etana, Echelon , Zephyr , or the pirate noobships? Gnosis - Isn't this just a scaled up version of an asset already in NPC use?
Etana - Existing hull, with V3 it seems creating new variants for ship skins became easier (or so I was led to believe by the blog about it) so I'd still qualify this as reduced visual effort. The balance effort to make it desirable from a stat perspective on the other hand was justified by it's place as an earned reward in the AT.
Echelon/Zephyr - They exemplify the "exceptionally weak" portion, to the point that I'd have a hard time thinking that there was any long period of time balancing them, but I will concede they required new art assets. You could also include the Primae in this catagory as it was created before the noctis and at the time doesn't seem it was slated to have another ship created for wider use based off the hull.
Pirate noob ships - All weak variants of existing assets, which aer actually the best example of my point when viewed as a whole |

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
4101
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 20:33:00 -
[37] - Quote
The Gnosis, so far, has not been promoted as a limited edition. There is much to be said in favour of modern journalism. By giving us the opinions of the uneducated, it keeps us in touch with the ignorance of the community.-á-á-á-á - Oscar Wilde |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
3163
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 20:35:00 -
[38] - Quote
Holgrak Blacksmith wrote:I agree, it really annoys me when "limited edition" ships get handed out wholesale. To anyone who claims rare ship collectors need to accept risk too, I put this to you; regular market traders do their thing based on speculation from info released PRIOR to upcoming patches, in pvp we get to look at upcoming patch data then make choices as to which skills to invest in and which ships are going to be hot. But here, ccp, with absolutely no notice, **** collectors out of billions. That's not risk/reward. Today collectors logged on to find several inches of CCP up in their hole.
And Market traders are left holding the bag when the info comes out on SISI and they're left holding the item long when they should be short. Just because they take their bath a few days/weeks before patch day doesn't mean they don't smell just as fresh.
Besides, if you're just collecting the things, why do you care how many other people are also able to collect them? I mean, I'd understand caring if you were trying to resell them for a profit, but then you run into the bus of "Speculators get given baths by CCP all the time." This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
"the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP)." -CCP Solomon |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
2383
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 20:38:00 -
[39] - Quote
MrDiao wrote:CCP should just stop releasing the useless limited edition ships at all. As they don't have any practical use(does not help to enhance the game context) and only make few collectors happy, while waste the resource and make many other players unhappy: people will just think "Well those limited issues are only for rich people I would never gotta use it". Or how about letting people with unique ships invent more? Would that be so bad? The only caveat might be the alliance tourny ships... you should be able to invent more but w/ a different skin. I'm all for more ships for all...
|

Arronicus
Shadows of Vorlon The Marmite Collective
515
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 00:05:00 -
[40] - Quote
ISD Gallifreyan wrote:I am also a collector so I appreciate what you are saying, but as long as they do not start being seeded they are still special /limited edition.
They aren't exactly 'limited edition' if they are a player referral reward. They can even be created inifinitely through the creation of new accounts and subscriptions. Does this put a real dollar value on them? Sure. But that doesn't make them limited edition, simply because they cost a different form of currency. Someone who wanted to put enough money into it, could acquire tens of thousands of them a week. This is simply not the case for a limited edition ship.
CCP, thankyou for making the destroyer models essentially a micro-transaction reward. (Create other email address, send referral to it, use other email to create eve account with referall, accept, claim destroyer pack as referral reward). We were all SO worried you weren't going to try to sneak in more micro-transactions into eve, after the failure of the decade that was Aurum in eve. |
|

LOL56
Galactic Express
48
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 00:11:00 -
[41] - Quote
Why waste database space and art access in order to have ships no one will ever fly |

None ofthe Above
498
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 00:30:00 -
[42] - Quote
Nova Satar wrote:Yusef Yeasef Yosef wrote:Risk should apply to collectables as well.
There is always a risk of some more being found/released, so invest at your own risk. Nothing in eve should be risk free. not really the right kind of risk though..... Devs making changes at a whim? Thats like saying theres risk in PVE is ccp halved rat bounties every now and then
Or say devs changing the construction costs of a ship, or eliminating drone poo or anything else they've changed over the last ten years.
You are not entitled to nobody ever making or offering another one of these items, unless they've made an EXPLICIT promise as part of the deal.
Vote, you apathetic bastards!-á -> http://community.eveonline.com/community/csm/vote/ CSM 8 Endorsements: Ali Aras, Malcanis, Mike Azaria, Psychotic Monk, Trebor Daehdoow, Ripard Teg |

JellyMons
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 00:46:00 -
[43] - Quote
I do feel like the devs purposely take advantage of the in game market value of these items.
Step 1: Release a few ships tied to a fairly exclusive promotion.
Step 2: Wait until they are all tucked away or destroyed by the foolish and market prices rise to crazy heights.
Step 3: Release as part of another money making promotion and profit while shitting on your fans.
Option step: Continue along down the slippery slope until you are selling eye-wear for the cost of a dreadnought and your playerbase falls apart.
Oh yeah. Doing this to items also lessens the success of future promotions. Most of the ships CCP gives out are useless in game besides the novelty of owning one. Take that away and why even bother? |

dark heartt
I Own Four Sheep Silent Requiem
76
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 01:07:00 -
[44] - Quote
Nova Satar wrote: People have huge interest in ships like the Guardian Vexor of which i think only 1 still exists?
There's more than one around, but it's impossible to know how many, as there may be some on inactive accounts and some people may have more than one. One was recently lost in the hold of a cargo ship and the collective response was rage at the person who thought to do that haha. |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
2385
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 01:32:00 -
[45] - Quote
I think we are long overdue for the return of the Gold Magnate. There's thousands of Gold Magnates on the Chinese server.
|

MrDiao
SUNDERING Goonswarm Federation
15
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 02:13:00 -
[46] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote:MrDiao wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote: And I would imagine it doesn't take too much time to make them since they are intentionally weak or clones of existing cheaper ships and in some cases even use already existing visual assets.
Do you include Gnosis, Etana, Echelon , Zephyr , or the pirate noobships? Gnosis - Isn't this just a scaled up version of an asset already in NPC use? Etana - Existing hull, with V3 it seems creating new variants for ship skins became easier (or so I was led to believe by the blog about it) so I'd still qualify this as reduced visual effort. The balance effort to make it desirable from a stat perspective on the other hand was justified by it's place as an earned reward in the AT. Echelon/Zephyr - They exemplify the "exceptionally weak" portion, to the point that I'd have a hard time thinking that there was any long period of time balancing them, but I will concede they required new art assets. You could also include the Primae in this catagory as it was created before the noctis and at the time doesn't seem it was slated to have another ship created for wider use based off the hull. Pirate noob ships - All weak variants of existing assets, which aer actually the best example of my point when viewed as a whole
I listing these ships not only because some of them costs extra art work, more important, they have the role that you can't find cheaper variants to replace with. |

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
230
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 02:20:00 -
[47] - Quote
I will say that CCP has, on occasion, irritated me, as a collector. Not by re-releasing things to the game, but by simply flat out deleting my stuff and giving me nothing at all, or something worth next to nothing, in return.
Before T2 mining drones came out, I had a collection of rare and oddball drones. Mining Drone: Advanced, Hellhound, etc.
CCP has pretty much deleted everything but the harvester drones, and them I suspect they left due to the massive freak out that would take place.
Now, granted, many of these were 'unplanned' releases. Others were super rare drops. And some of them cost as much THEN as a Guardian Vexor does NOW.
But CCP happily deleted them and replaced them with things like: Mining Drone II.
I don't mind losing my ass becasue I took a ship out of my hanger and lost it. I DO mind when CCP opens my hanger and divests me of billions of isk just because they can.
The Most Interesting Player In Eve. |

Entity
X-Factor Industries Synthetic Existence
388
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 02:39:00 -
[48] - Quote
Gogela wrote:I think we are long overdue for the return of the Gold Magnate. There's thousands of Gold Magnates on the Chinese server.
I hope that was sarcasm.
Oh, and on the bright side, Quafe Catalysts weren't available before. GòªGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGòæGûæGûæGûæGòöGòùGûæGòæGûæGòæGûæGòöGòùGûæGòªGòæGûæGòöGòùGòöGòªGòùGòöGòù GòæGûæGòöGòùGòöGòùGòöGòúGûæGòöGòùGòáGûæGûæGòáGûæGòáGòùGòáGò¥GûæGòæGòáGûæGòáGò¥GòæGòæGòæGòÜGòù Gò¬GòÉGòÜGò¥GòæGûæGòÜGò¥GûæGòÜGò¥GòæGûæGûæGòÜGò¥GòæGòæGòÜGò¥GûæGò¬GòÜGò¥GòÜGò¥GòæGûæGòæGòÜGò¥ Got Item? |

Captain Muscles
Clan Farthammer
14
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 06:44:00 -
[49] - Quote
This thread should be renamed "Same ****, Different Day." It works on so many levels. :) |

Akrasjel Lanate
Naquatech Conglomerate
1097
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 07:33:00 -
[50] - Quote
Nova Satar wrote:the post above sums everything up.
The destroyers are just todays example, they have released plenty of special and limited editions over time but then closed production runs thus making them a collectable. Now today announce they are suddenly giving out more as buddy program rewards!
it just seems when it comes to draining a few more dollars out the playerbase, anything is possible. Like the guy said above, in 3 years time will they be giving away Adrestias t everyone who buys a pack of 20 plex? probably not, but the point is you can't be sure.
But aren't the catalysts firts ships with NPC skins(that CCP showed on the last fanfest), i dont think there purpose is to be limited to some colection item. |
|

Jacob Holland
Weyland-Vulcan Industries
136
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 08:01:00 -
[51] - Quote
iskflakes wrote:The re-releasing of limited edition items is extremely frustrating to rare item collectors such as myself. [snip] Then the snowball launchers that got needlessly deleted to make room for the new festival launcher (destroying hundreds of billions in rare collections) [snip] Can I be certain that alliance tournament ships won't be re-released in a future buddy programme? Can I be certain the state issue ships won't be given away as part of some ******** PLEX promotion?
With the exception of the Festival Launchers (which was rather annoying) none of these promotions actually affect your collection. What they change is the ISK value of your collection.
If you're collecting for the sake of having a collection then this promotion should not cause you frustration, if on the other hand you're collecting purely as a business venture, an ISK investment, then there should be a risk to that, no investment should be that safe, and these additional promotions provide some of that risk.
I would be very glad to see new releases of the tournament ships and Guardian Vexors - if for no other reason than I once had the chance to buy a Guardian-Vexor for less than 100 mil (which was more than I'd ever seen at the time) and only discovered after the opportunity had passed that several corpies would have loaned me the money given the value of the ship at the time...
|

Alara IonStorm
4883
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 08:09:00 -
[52] - Quote
LOL56 wrote:Why waste database space and art access in order to have ships no one will ever fly This.
Collector skins and modified hulls are different but actual ships.
I would like to see a mass produced Gnosis, mass produced Pirate Ships based on those Noob Frigates and mass produced Zephyrs. Limited Issue and Special Stat items are great for collectors, I own quite a few of them. But does anyone wish they made the Noctis a limited release instead of the Primae...
Ships like the Gnosis should be a series part of EVE for many years to come, not 99.99% a hanger ornament after 3 months. |

Turelus
Caldari Independent Navy Reserve The Fourth District
358
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 08:54:00 -
[53] - Quote
LOL56 wrote:Why waste database space and art access in order to have ships no one will ever fly
Lieutenant Turelus
Caldari Independent Navy Reserve
The Fourth District |

Rakshasa Taisab
Sane Industries Inc.
1161
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 09:23:00 -
[54] - Quote
iskflakes wrote:[I'm asking CCP to communicate ahead of time which items are special and which are not. Communicating by giving mixed signals then re-releasing items at random as some kind of "lesson" is not good communication. CCP's current approach marginalizes my style of gameplay, so what's the lesson I'm supposed to take from that? That collecting rare items is not a legitimate occupation in EVE Online? They did communicate, however what they have never said is that the items are single-run limited items.
Also, nice overcoat. Nyan |

Nex apparatu5
Friendship is Podding Test Alliance Please Ignore
476
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 12:25:00 -
[55] - Quote
Oh man, I can't wait for the tears when CCP uses the old State battleships and the guardian vexor as prizes for the next AT |

Bi-Mi Lansatha
Tactical Universal Research and Development Caldari Industrialist Association
76
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 12:29:00 -
[56] - Quote
JellyMons wrote:...I do feel like the devs purposely take advantage of the in game market value of these items... Are you saying a bunch of ISK rich players have been scammed!!! In Eve!!! Say it isn't so. 
|

Kitty Bear
Disturbed Friends Of Diazepam Tribal Band
619
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 12:34:00 -
[57] - Quote
Bi-Mi Lansatha wrote:JellyMons wrote:...I do feel like the devs purposely take advantage of the in game market value of these items... Are you saying a bunch of ISK rich players have been scammed!!! In Eve!!! Say it isn't so. 
faith in humanity ......
restored |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
1618
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 12:44:00 -
[58] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:Nova Satar wrote:Seriously CCP, can you STOP re-releasing supposed "limited edition" ships everytime you want to squeeze for an extra buck.
What is the point of running a promotion stating "only 1000 ships made" if 6 months later you start giving them out again. It completely detracts from the whole point.
Release a batch, close production, and never make them again. This way people will have an incentive to actually try and get hold of them. What did I miss this time? Please give more info on any recent reissues. Mr Epeen 
I seem to have missed it too, anyone got a link?
|

Venom13Games
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 12:46:00 -
[59] - Quote
CCP Nadir wrote:Let me take this opportunity to say. . . . . . .the Quafe Catalyst is now available as a reward for the Buddy program. The new "Catalyst Collection" reward option includes all of the following,
- Quafe Catalyst
- Intaki Catalyst
- Inner Zone Shipping Catalyst
- Aliastra Catalyst
- Interbus Catalyst
- Catalyst
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=218879&find=unread |

Reiisha
Evolution The Retirement Club
247
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 13:06:00 -
[60] - Quote
Speculation is risky...
As it's supposed to be.
If you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all... |
|

Sentamon
811
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 13:26:00 -
[61] - Quote
*pretending to care about your dusty ship collection that you can't even show off* ~ Professional Forum Alt -á~ |

Turelus
Caldari Independent Navy Reserve The Fourth District
359
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 13:31:00 -
[62] - Quote
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:Turelus wrote:Better yet, stop making limited edition ships which sit and gather dust in hangers.  They make you angry, bro ? Yup! I would rather see these ships seeded to be used instead of gathering dust in collectors hangers. The reskinned same stats ships should really have been kept back from being ships until CCP could release an actual way to skin ships, though I guess we could just add these to LP stores in futures so missioning for SuVee would let you trade a normal Heron for the SuVee one. (this removes the option of having skins be something like a rig that's applied)
As for the rookie ships, Echalon(sp?) these would have made fantastic little ships to add to EVE and have flying around everywhere, instead they're all sitting in hangers doing nothing. Lieutenant Turelus
Caldari Independent Navy Reserve
The Fourth District |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
1618
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 13:31:00 -
[63] - Quote
Venom13Games wrote:CCP Nadir wrote:Let me take this opportunity to say. . . . . . .the Quafe Catalyst is now available as a reward for the Buddy program. The new "Catalyst Collection" reward option includes all of the following,
- Quafe Catalyst
- Intaki Catalyst
- Inner Zone Shipping Catalyst
- Aliastra Catalyst
- Interbus Catalyst
- Catalyst
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=218879&find=unread
Thanks |

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
4101
|
Posted - 2013.04.12 13:56:00 -
[64] - Quote
Turelus wrote:Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:Turelus wrote:Better yet, stop making limited edition ships which sit and gather dust in hangers.  They make you angry, bro ? Yup! I would rather see these ships seeded to be used instead of gathering dust in collectors hangers. As for the rookie ships, Echalon(sp?) these would have made fantastic little ships to add to EVE and have flying around everywhere, instead they're all sitting in hangers doing nothing.
But is not that what happens in Real Life to the classic cars people collect ? And all those Star Wars toys still in boxes ?
Gimme a break.
That is the nature of collecting and preservation. Just because these are pixels does not change the dynamic.
CCP has decided to change the dynamic apparently though. There is much to be said in favour of modern journalism. By giving us the opinions of the uneducated, it keeps us in touch with the ignorance of the community.-á-á-á-á - Oscar Wilde |

Jacob Holland
Weyland-Vulcan Industries
136
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 09:49:00 -
[65] - Quote
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:But is not that what happens in Real Life to the classic cars people collect ? And all those Star Wars toys still in boxes ? Those old Star Wars toys, still in their boxes, and the Dinky toys which went before them were not limited editions. Those classic cars? Once upon a time they were just cars... Noone bought a Jaguar E-Type in order to speculatively preserve it, people bought them to drive them and to have fun. If you had speculated on a collection of 78rpm audio disks then you'd find that the value of that collection (with very few notably exceptional recordings) crashed - the availability of the recordings in other formats (vinyl, CD, .mp3) and the difficulty of maintaining the required equipment to use them means that the majority of 78 collections are worth less than it would cost to find the odd gems within them.
|

Miilla
Hulkageddon Orphanage
449
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 09:55:00 -
[66] - Quote
It is a 10 year old game, what do you expect, they run out of creative ideas and just are beating the dead donkey for more money while they can.
Theyre future was WoD, they fecked that up, now it's Dust, that's a feck up too, now its whine-o-meter patching.
This reminds me of the Amiga dying, they brought out a CD32, a failure, then the 600, another failure, lost their way. |

Felicity Love
STARKRAFT Joint Venture Conglomerate
435
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 12:02:00 -
[67] - Quote
Well, CCP can "re-release" a few State Issue Ravens right to my hangar, thank you.
Rare ships are far too rare in the first place, and what's the point if they aren't even SEEN once in awhile ?
At least seed a few every now and then so that they might actually be something more than a useless footnote in EVE history, because, as it stands now, the current definition of "rare ship" in this game might as well mean "non-existent" (and thus pointless) as far as the vast majority players are concerned.
Proud Beta Tester for "Bumping Uglies for Dummies" |

IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69
Wolfsbrigade Lost Obsession
332
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 12:25:00 -
[68] - Quote
I used to have a moderate collectors hangar, when the first was re-released (can't remember what it was now) I decided it wasn't worth risking holding on to everything knowing CCP could devalue it all chasing a quick buck so I just sold everything and cashed out, haven't looked back since then quite a few would have been devalued by promotions.
I believe things like AT ships are probably quite safe, but things like interbus shuttles are probably in the danger zone. Candy's Capital Shop |

Doc Severide
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
31
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 12:50:00 -
[69] - Quote
Nova Satar wrote:War Kitten wrote:The first release had black borders and more rounded edges on the pixels.
The new ones are all foil bordered pixels.
If you were a true collector you could tell the difference. Im not actually a collector, but i just feel annoyed on behalf of the people who are when i keep seeing it happen. Sound like a busybody to me. Let those people worry about their own problems. I think the whole thing is hilarious. Like you're gonna tell CCP what they can and can't do.... |

Vyanr
SKORPION LEGION
3
|
Posted - 2013.04.14 17:10:00 -
[70] - Quote
Oh man, just imagine if they gifted every 100m SP + pilot with a racial, State-issue battleship.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |