| Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Ginger Barbarella
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
1267
|
Posted - 2013.04.25 21:39:00 -
[31] - Quote
I've got no problem with requiring miners to do something other than sit on an ever-widening arse and chat on EveVoice for hours on end. What I want to see is someone actually leak something credible from what the CSM was allegedly shown, but NOOOOOO--- they're afraid of the almighty NDA.
*bah* "Blow it all on Quafe and strippers." --- Sorlac |

Seven Koskanaiken
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
146
|
Posted - 2013.04.25 21:46:00 -
[32] - Quote
i don't think anyone is the game just mines. people say there are people who just mine and nothing else, i think it's an urban myth. |

Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E.
1774
|
Posted - 2013.04.25 21:49:00 -
[33] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:the problem with mining isn't the mechanics of the activity, it's with the fact that it encourages being antisocial. interacting with other players is nothing but detrimental. I assume you mean "interacting with other players while mining is nothing but detrimental". Mostly true. Very very occasionally you see "x up for free orca boosts". But paranoia limits even this level of interaction. And if you were to make the offer it does help others strip the system of ore that could otherwise be yours. http://vincentoneve.wordpress.com/ |

Dave Stark
2846
|
Posted - 2013.04.25 22:02:00 -
[34] - Quote
Vincent Athena wrote:Dave Stark wrote:the problem with mining isn't the mechanics of the activity, it's with the fact that it encourages being antisocial. interacting with other players is nothing but detrimental. I assume you mean "interacting with other players while mining is nothing but detrimental". Mostly true. Very very occasionally you see "x up for free orca boosts". But paranoia limits even this level of interaction. And if you were to make the offer it does help others strip the system of ore that could otherwise be yours.
yes, that's what i meant.
giving other players orca bonuses does indeed increase competition for resources. joining a corp simply leaves you vulnerable to awoxing and wardecs (with no reward)
there simply isn't a benefit of mining with other people, at least not in high sec. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7699
|
Posted - 2013.04.25 22:09:00 -
[35] - Quote
AFK ice mining is really no different from botting mine quotes from my posts at your peril, badposters TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |

Dave Stark
2846
|
Posted - 2013.04.25 22:19:00 -
[36] - Quote
Andski wrote:AFK ice mining is really no different from botting
i disagree.
my ship doesn't dock and unload itself :( |

Captain Tardbar
NEWB ALERT
316
|
Posted - 2013.04.25 22:23:00 -
[37] - Quote
Andski wrote:AFK ice mining is really no different from botting
That is not entirely true.
Botting will get you banned.
AFK ice mining will just make you look bad.
Right now I am sipping on a red cabernet sauvignon listening to Mozart's Horn Concerto No. 3 e-flat major and ice mining. "Entitlement" is a euphemism for "I hate the way you play and it makes me cry like a baby". If you fantasize about being immoral it means you enjoy being immoral deep down. |

Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E.
1774
|
Posted - 2013.04.25 22:49:00 -
[38] - Quote
Andski wrote:AFK ice mining is really no different from botting I also disagree. Botting gets you banned. being AK will not. That's a huge difference. http://vincentoneve.wordpress.com/ |

Georgina Parmala
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
79
|
Posted - 2013.04.25 22:52:00 -
[39] - Quote
Seven Koskanaiken wrote:i don't think anyone is the game just mines. people say there are people who just mine and nothing else, i think it's an urban myth. Sadly, it's not.
I've had the dubious pleasure of interacting with someone who loves mining, identifies himself as a miner, and couldn't be bothered to do a damn thing in the game beyond that. It really blows my mind.
Knowing that also somehow made it more fun, when he managed to royally **** me off and I opened fire on his Exhumer. |

Felicity Love
STARKRAFT Joint Venture Conglomerate
523
|
Posted - 2013.04.25 23:09:00 -
[40] - Quote
Georgina Parmala wrote: Sadly, it's not.
I've had the dubious pleasure of interacting with someone who loves mining, identifies himself as a miner, and couldn't be bothered to do a damn thing in the game beyond that. It really blows my mind.
Knowing that also somehow made it more fun, when he managed to royally **** me off and I opened fire on his Exhumer.
Nobody is "wrong" in that situation.
If you watched CCP Soundwave today during his "couch chat", he made it quite clear that he's happy when players take matters into their own hands and play the way they want to. So if dude wants to mine and be a mouthy tard but, as a result, you decided to shoot him in the face then "The Powers That Be" are happy it's working that way.
Interactivity driven by players. 
Proud Beta Tester for "Bumping Uglies for Dummies" |

Dave Stark
2848
|
Posted - 2013.04.25 23:12:00 -
[41] - Quote
Felicity Love wrote:Georgina Parmala wrote: Sadly, it's not.
I've had the dubious pleasure of interacting with someone who loves mining, identifies himself as a miner, and couldn't be bothered to do a damn thing in the game beyond that. It really blows my mind.
Knowing that also somehow made it more fun, when he managed to royally **** me off and I opened fire on his Exhumer.
Nobody is "wrong" in that situation. If you watched CCP Soundwave today during his "couch chat", he made it quite clear that he's happy when players take matters into their own hands and play the way they want to. So if dude wants to mine and be a mouthy tard but, as a result, you decided to shoot him in the face then "The Powers That Be" are happy it's working that way. Interactivity driven by players. 
that's pretty selective. he also said he'd rather see fewer, but larger asteroid belts, so you aren't sat on your own because then you aren't interacting.
he's right, generally. |

Multivariate
Republic University Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2013.04.25 23:36:00 -
[42] - Quote
Last I checked microsoft spent a cool $20-$40 million on a game that included interactive crafting. I hated interactive crafting in vanguard and I'll probably hate it here, though I am not particularly worried.
Haven't watched the fanfest stream yet, I'm stuck on satellite in the middle of nowhere for another day :(
I mine when I have a 1500-3000ms ping. |

Georgina Parmala
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
79
|
Posted - 2013.04.25 23:58:00 -
[43] - Quote
Felicity Love wrote:Nobody is "wrong" in that situation. Interactivity driven by players.  Oh for sure. I can respect the fact he chooses to play the game in that manner. Doesn't mean I understand it, but I have nothing against him doing what he wants.
Till he starts mouthing off in local for no reason. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7699
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 03:40:00 -
[44] - Quote
Vincent Athena wrote:I also disagree. Botting gets you banned. being AK will not. That's a huge difference.
Right, no difference. mine quotes from my posts at your peril, badposters TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |

Nathalie LaPorte
Republic University Minmatar Republic
129
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 05:06:00 -
[45] - Quote
Andski wrote:Vincent Athena wrote:I also disagree. Botting gets you banned. being AK will not. That's a huge difference. Right, no difference.
I look at it as a hierarchy of bad game design decisions. Game roles vary in complexity. Something like FC, or the more complex specialty ships in fleet warfare, you put your best players on. then you have simpler things that anyone with a pulse can do. Next down are things that simple bots can do, and lowest on the ladder is things that can be done AFK. In that respect, AFK'able activities are much worse than bottable activities. In terms of respecting the rules, AFK'ing is currently superior to botting, as it violates the spirit of the rules, but not the letter, whereas botting violates both. AFK-able activities also tend to reward less ISK than bottable ones.
In the end, looking at afk'ing and botting from every perspective, while there are distinct differences between the two, they are tied for the lowest rung on the overall bot-aspirancy ladder, so in that sense they are pretty much the same. it might seem counter-intuitive that something which isn't botting could be just as bot-aspirant as botting, and yet it is.
|

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor Cosmic Consortium
3284
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 07:17:00 -
[46] - Quote
Andski wrote:AFK ice mining is really no different from botting
Autopiloting is really no different from botting.
AFK cloaking is really no different from botting.
Moon mining is really no different from botting.
Day 0 advice for new players: Day 0 Advice for New Players |

dark heartt
I Own Four Sheep The Methodical Alliance
136
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 08:27:00 -
[47] - Quote
Captain Tardbar wrote:Seeing the leaked documents on ring mining requiring more interactivity on asteroid mining and the changes to ice mining, it appears that CCP is moving in a direction of more interactivity in minining.
We will most likley see the details about this tomorrow during the talk on EVE and mining...
That said, I would like to play Devil's advocate and say this might actually be a bad thing for the EVE and its economy.
Mining draws the type of persons who don't want to bother with missions (which by most accounts is simply aggro managment). Miner's seem to enjoy playing the game with little interaction as possible. The pinacle of this aspect is found with people who ice mine which is basically targeting an ice rock, pushing a button, and then waiting 30 minutes.
These people have no interest in playing a game that requires them to push buttons every 60 secdonds. Even regular mining can be done mostly done afk.
Like I said, I don't know what most miner's do while mining. I have talked to people that actually sit there and watch the rocks, but I suspect most of them do other things while playing EVE. Things like watching Youtube or Netflix, chat on teamspeak, troll the forums, listen to music, or generally do other things. (I have been known to do homework).
From an anecdotal perspective, I have the option to play many games. From single player games, to a plethora of multiplayer games.
Personally two games I have been enjoying recently are Star Wars the Old Republic and Victoria 2. That said, I have been playing EVE quite a bit more than those two games even though I have been doing nothing more than Ice Mining. Why? Because I like to listen to music (Mozart) and sip on a glas of merlot while I surf the internet while ice mining.
Its quite relaxing and an interesting way to pass the time.
That said, I would not recommend it for everyone. Its not as exciting and thrilling as a lowsec roam which sometimes I like to do, but sometimes I just want to vegetate.
If let's say, ice mining and mining in general became much more interactive, those players who enjoy "playing the game while not playing the game" have lost their niche.
If one has to constantly pay attention to the game much like missions (well sort of) then you might as well be playing missions.
In this respect, I suspct that a good deal of miners who currently enjoyed their relaxing pastime (well when not being ganked) will find the game too interactive to sit there and relax.
I don't know what everyone will do (I'm sure someone will rage quit). Peronsally I might stop mining and do something else for a living (say turn my current funds into industry), but if I and others stop mining, then perhaps the mineral prices will start to rise causing inflation in general. Which I am sure mission runners and those who spend their real money on plex will not enjoy.
Of course this is just speculation until tomorrow's talk on mining.
It might be quite possible to mine at a lower rate without the interaction and the interaction only increases yield but is not a requirement.
But if mining does require more interactivity for any yield, will most of you non-miners consider mining? Will you missions runners and PVP types quit your current business model and pick up a mining barge to get in on the rising profit related to mining?
Or will only the current miners continue to mine?
Is CCP making a big assuming that players want more mining interactivity while not actually knowing this to be true?
And any players who answer in this thread "yes, I want more interactivity" are you going to personally mine because of these changes or is this just an expectation of what you think other people want?
And yes, I suppose I admitted to being a dirty miner.
Interesting read OP and I can understand where you are coming from. However as a miner myself I have to say I hope there is more interactivity in mining. It doesn't have to be much, but somthing to stop the AFK miners getting just as much as me as someone who is always at my keyboard. I think mining rocks is reasonably good right now (they run out so quick when you are using a mack or hulk so you need to switch targets), but ice mining should never have been made the way it is now. It's almost better to be AFK with ice at the moment. |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
2205
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 09:24:00 -
[48] - Quote
dark heartt wrote:Captain Tardbar wrote:Seeing the leaked documents on ring mining requiring more interactivity on asteroid mining and the changes to ice mining, it appears that CCP is moving in a direction of more interactivity in minining.
We will most likley see the details about this tomorrow during the talk on EVE and mining...
That said, I would like to play Devil's advocate and say this might actually be a bad thing for the EVE and its economy.
Mining draws the type of persons who don't want to bother with missions (which by most accounts is simply aggro managment). Miner's seem to enjoy playing the game with little interaction as possible. The pinacle of this aspect is found with people who ice mine which is basically targeting an ice rock, pushing a button, and then waiting 30 minutes.
These people have no interest in playing a game that requires them to push buttons every 60 secdonds. Even regular mining can be done mostly done afk.
Like I said, I don't know what most miner's do while mining. I have talked to people that actually sit there and watch the rocks, but I suspect most of them do other things while playing EVE. Things like watching Youtube or Netflix, chat on teamspeak, troll the forums, listen to music, or generally do other things. (I have been known to do homework).
From an anecdotal perspective, I have the option to play many games. From single player games, to a plethora of multiplayer games.
Personally two games I have been enjoying recently are Star Wars the Old Republic and Victoria 2. That said, I have been playing EVE quite a bit more than those two games even though I have been doing nothing more than Ice Mining. Why? Because I like to listen to music (Mozart) and sip on a glas of merlot while I surf the internet while ice mining.
Its quite relaxing and an interesting way to pass the time.
That said, I would not recommend it for everyone. Its not as exciting and thrilling as a lowsec roam which sometimes I like to do, but sometimes I just want to vegetate.
If let's say, ice mining and mining in general became much more interactive, those players who enjoy "playing the game while not playing the game" have lost their niche.
If one has to constantly pay attention to the game much like missions (well sort of) then you might as well be playing missions.
In this respect, I suspct that a good deal of miners who currently enjoyed their relaxing pastime (well when not being ganked) will find the game too interactive to sit there and relax.
I don't know what everyone will do (I'm sure someone will rage quit). Peronsally I might stop mining and do something else for a living (say turn my current funds into industry), but if I and others stop mining, then perhaps the mineral prices will start to rise causing inflation in general. Which I am sure mission runners and those who spend their real money on plex will not enjoy.
Of course this is just speculation until tomorrow's talk on mining.
It might be quite possible to mine at a lower rate without the interaction and the interaction only increases yield but is not a requirement.
But if mining does require more interactivity for any yield, will most of you non-miners consider mining? Will you missions runners and PVP types quit your current business model and pick up a mining barge to get in on the rising profit related to mining?
Or will only the current miners continue to mine?
Is CCP making a big assuming that players want more mining interactivity while not actually knowing this to be true?
And any players who answer in this thread "yes, I want more interactivity" are you going to personally mine because of these changes or is this just an expectation of what you think other people want?
And yes, I suppose I admitted to being a dirty miner. Interesting read OP and I can understand where you are coming from. However as a miner myself I have to say I hope there is more interactivity in mining. It doesn't have to be much, but somthing to stop the AFK miners getting just as much as me as someone who is always at my keyboard. I think mining rocks is reasonably good right now (they run out so quick when you are using a mack or hulk so you need to switch targets), but ice mining should never have been made the way it is now. It's almost better to be AFK with ice at the moment.
+1 for getting it. A higher barrier to success adds value to mining as a profession.
Value = Demand / Supply. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Dave Stark
2856
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 09:32:00 -
[49] - Quote
dark heartt wrote:Interesting read OP and I can understand where you are coming from. However as a miner myself I have to say I hope there is more interactivity in mining. It doesn't have to be much, but somthing to stop the AFK miners getting just as much as me as someone who is always at my keyboard. I think mining rocks is reasonably good right now (they run out so quick when you are using a mack or hulk so you need to switch targets), but ice mining should never have been made the way it is now. It's almost better to be AFK with ice at the moment.
basically you just want the mackinaw's ore bay removing. |

dark heartt
I Own Four Sheep The Methodical Alliance
137
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 12:35:00 -
[50] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote: basically you just want the mackinaw's ore bay removing.
That'd be a start. |

Dave Stark
2857
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 13:14:00 -
[51] - Quote
dark heartt wrote:Dave Stark wrote: basically you just want the mackinaw's ore bay removing.
That'd be a start.
a start to making the mackinaw completely useless. it'll be out tanked by the skiff (which is already a redundant role, more or less) and out yielded by the hulk, leaving the mackinaw the best at... nothing. |

Georgina Parmala
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
79
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 17:18:00 -
[52] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:dark heartt wrote:Dave Stark wrote: basically you just want the mackinaw's ore bay removing.
That'd be a start. a start to making the mackinaw completely useless. it'll be out tanked by the skiff (which is already a redundant role, more or less) and out yielded by the hulk, leaving the mackinaw the best at... nothing. There's a difference between "I have more cargo capacity so you don't NEED to jet with a dedicated hauler" and "I got this, go watch TV for half an hour"
Here's a crazy idea. What if you cut that ore bay in half. You still have 17.5km3. Make the skiff like 10 instead of the current 15. Drop the T1 barges accordingly. That would be a start.
I really don't see any reason for a dedicated mining ship to hold one and a quarter jetcans of cargo and surpass the capacity of dedicated haulers. That's a max skill, cargo fitted and rigged mammoth using giant containers worth of space. That's as much as a cargo expanded and rigged Occator/Impel, the T2 transports with the largest potential cargo bays. |

Dave Stark
2863
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 17:20:00 -
[53] - Quote
Georgina Parmala wrote:Dave Stark wrote:dark heartt wrote:Dave Stark wrote: basically you just want the mackinaw's ore bay removing.
That'd be a start. a start to making the mackinaw completely useless. it'll be out tanked by the skiff (which is already a redundant role, more or less) and out yielded by the hulk, leaving the mackinaw the best at... nothing. There's a difference between "I have more cargo capacity so you don't NEED to jet with a dedicated hauler" and "I got this, go watch TV for half an hour" Here's a crazy idea. What if you cut that ore bay in half. You still have 17.5km3. Make the skiff like 10 instead of the current 15. Drop the T1 barges accordingly. That would be a start. I really don't see any reason for a dedicated mining ship to hold one and a quarter jetcans of cargo and surpass the capacity of dedicated haulers. That's a max skill, cargo fitted and rigged mammoth using giant containers worth of space. That's as much as a cargo expanded and rigged Occator/Impel, the T2 transports with the largest potential cargo bays.
then it's too small to be efficient, so you're better off jetcanning with a hulk again. |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
2205
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 17:56:00 -
[54] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:Georgina Parmala wrote:Dave Stark wrote:dark heartt wrote:Dave Stark wrote: basically you just want the mackinaw's ore bay removing.
That'd be a start. a start to making the mackinaw completely useless. it'll be out tanked by the skiff (which is already a redundant role, more or less) and out yielded by the hulk, leaving the mackinaw the best at... nothing. There's a difference between "I have more cargo capacity so you don't NEED to jet with a dedicated hauler" and "I got this, go watch TV for half an hour" Here's a crazy idea. What if you cut that ore bay in half. You still have 17.5km3. Make the skiff like 10 instead of the current 15. Drop the T1 barges accordingly. That would be a start. I really don't see any reason for a dedicated mining ship to hold one and a quarter jetcans of cargo and surpass the capacity of dedicated haulers. That's a max skill, cargo fitted and rigged mammoth using giant containers worth of space. That's as much as a cargo expanded and rigged Occator/Impel, the T2 transports with the largest potential cargo bays. then it's too small to be efficient, so you're better off jetcanning with a hulk again. A higher barrier to success adds value to the mining profession.
Value = Demand / Supply. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Dave Stark
2863
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 17:58:00 -
[55] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote:A higher barrier to success adds value to the mining profession.
Value = Demand / Supply. ever thought about posting something useful instead of the same irrelevant equation?
it's not a barrier to success, it's simply making a ship redundant. |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
2205
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 18:01:00 -
[56] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:A higher barrier to success adds value to the mining profession.
Value = Demand / Supply. ever thought about posting something useful instead of the same irrelevant equation? it's not a barrier to success, it's simply making a ship redundant. You mean like the Hulk is now? He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Dave Stark
2863
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 18:04:00 -
[57] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:A higher barrier to success adds value to the mining profession.
Value = Demand / Supply. ever thought about posting something useful instead of the same irrelevant equation? it's not a barrier to success, it's simply making a ship redundant. You mean like the Hulk is now?
except, it isn't. |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
2205
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 18:08:00 -
[58] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:A higher barrier to success adds value to the mining profession.
Value = Demand / Supply. ever thought about posting something useful instead of the same irrelevant equation? it's not a barrier to success, it's simply making a ship redundant. You mean like the Hulk is now? except, it isn't. That information is literally four months old and was released shortly after the changes featured in Retribution.
There were a lot of Hulks left over. Their relevancy continues to decline.
By the way, enjoy the 45 minute hands-free mining times while they last.
Apparently, my equation isn't so irrelevant after all! He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Dave Stark
2864
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 18:20:00 -
[59] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:A higher barrier to success adds value to the mining profession.
Value = Demand / Supply. ever thought about posting something useful instead of the same irrelevant equation? it's not a barrier to success, it's simply making a ship redundant. You mean like the Hulk is now? except, it isn't. That information is literally four months old and was released shortly after the changes featured in Retribution. There were a lot of Hulks left over. Their relevancy continues to decline. By the way, enjoy the 45 minute hands-free mining times while they last. Apparently, my equation isn't so irrelevant after all!
yet they're still the highest yield ship in the game, so they aren't redundant.
and your equation still is irrelevant. |

Lady Areola Fappington
New Order Logistics CODE.
95
|
Posted - 2013.04.26 18:27:00 -
[60] - Quote
The fundamental idea of parking ship in space for hours on end while non-interactive modules cycle is just flawed. I don't think it could be salvaged. Fixing mining for good would require a grand overhaul that just isn't going to happen.
At best, I see CCP implementing some type of mining minigame, that effectively makes you be ATK doing something for max yield. Don't worry miners, I'm here to help!
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |