| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 .. 11 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Silence iKillYouu
KA POW POW Inc Late Night Alliance
237
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 10:03:00 -
[31] - Quote
ccp have been working on FW alot. stop crying go camp highsec stations if its to hard for u to get kills. EVE Mail me i dont check forums often. |

Colt Blackhawk
The Amarrian Expendables
118
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 10:15:00 -
[32] - Quote
Silence iKillYouu wrote:ccp have been working on FW alot. stop crying go camp highsec stations if its to hard for u to get kills.
I want good fights not f..t..d kills. All the actual system gave us are noob minnie billionaires, plexing everything with stabby cloaky ships to hell, getting 3b pods and boosters and then blobbing everything to hell. If that doesn-¦t work they return to their stabby cloaky ships again.... FW is like belt mining^^
|

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
890
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 12:17:00 -
[33] - Quote
Rommell Drako wrote:CCP should just make a change where it makes the warzone a warzone instead of low sec mission running.
Instead of ranting I want to make one simple idea known.
I think that kills made in Solar system should be applied to the control of that solar system. Math and explanation:
To win control of a system you must gain 100% control (put system into vulnerable) and kill the ihub.
Each plex that you complete (orbit a beacon for 10, 15, 20 or 25 min.) gives you .7% additional movement towards control (towards caputering of defending.)
For easy math (and simplicity of overall thought) all math is done at T1 control. Novice - 10 min - 5,000 LP Small - 15 min - 8,000 LP medium - 20 min - 12,700 LP
So if I do the easy math which is running the Novice sites only: this is simple showing not exact numbers:
To push the system to 100% from 0% would take 143 sites. (novice sites) 5,000 LP per site (5,000 x 143 = 715000) 715,000 LP given to pilots for 100% control of a system. If you earn LP for PVP kills (which is based off of the insurance payout) then those LP payments should be matched and paid into the ihub and used towards the max % of flip.
IE: Killing a hurricane gives (lets say) 5,000 LP payout. That means that the pilots involved receive 5,000 LP and the ihub receives 5,000 LP towards the max of 715,000 or whatever arbitrary number CCP wants to give it.
This would bring PVP into the front line where pvp actually matters. Killing a enemy BS fleet is worth more then 5 hours of sitting afk with a cloak frig plexing.
Since the payouts are based on insurance payouts (dont quote me but im pretty sure its either insurance or its the amount of the ship value x some %. Since LP payouts are always a fraction of the ship kill this will prevent people from abusing it since it will not be worth the isk loss.
This is a warzone, why does PVP not matter?
Best example is the Amarr Militia and Fweddit. Fweddit has a massive amount of kills and PVPs all the time. Yet the minmatar are (were) winning the warzone due to broken farming mechanics.
This brings this question to my mind:
"IS THIS A WARZONE OR IS THIS LOWSEC MISSION RUNNING?"
Victory Points (VP) are what is collected to change sov in fw. LP are currently seperate. Currently a larger plex gives more lp but the same vp.
You can add lp to a hub to increase your level of control of a system. But not vp.
But I think its clear from your post that you want people to get some vp for kills in a system. (I'm not trying to be pedantic, just tryign to make usre I understand what you are proposing) I think that would be ok unless it were so focused on kills that:
1)People would hold onto sov by denying the enemy kills in a system such as by only plexing in stabbed ships.
2) The plex pvp becomes replaced with gate camping since its much easier to get kills by gate camping. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
890
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 13:05:00 -
[34] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:chatgris wrote:Timer rollback to starting state when no-one is in the plex. Timer rollback at 2x or 3x rate. If some dude wants to sit in the plex cloaked up, then he can really be griefed by the other side sitting there running the timer back quickly. Anyways, easy enough of a fix.
I am not sure it will fix it, but it will definitely be an improvement. It seems gallente have replaced the atron as their rabbit ship of choice with the comet. I am getting about 4 warp away commets per 1 that will fight.
One other point. I think the problem with fw sov is "rabbits" not just "farmers." Both always warp away but farmers are in it for the lp rabbits are in it to win sov. They are both a huge problem imo. There are just as many defensive plexers who warp away as offensive plexers.
Adding npcs or buffing them won't effect that at all. And will likely just make it worse for pvpers - like it was before inferno. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Zarnak Wulf
In Exile. Imperial Outlaws.
1183
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 14:23:00 -
[35] - Quote
The problem with sovereignty in FW is more due to TZ discrepancies then farmers at this time. You don't need an alarm system to tell you where the farmers are right now. Amarr owns 4 systems. Take a 10 minute AFK and you'll come back to them thick as flies. Go to bed and wake up to 15% contested.
The PvP side is really okay. Minmatar had over 5900 pilots in it's ranks as of yesterday. Amarr had a bit over 3700. Despite being outnumbered by over 2k pilots Amarr consistently gets more kills. I can log on and find a fight within minutes. When I was in Minmatar I struggled to get 100 kills a month. I pretty consistently get 200 kills a month in Amarr militia. Amarr militia at least is a PvP paradise.
The isk isn't bad on the Amarr side either- despite our tier one status. I pretty consistently bounce between 2 and 4 billion isk by just cashing in LP.
The issue is that there is no siren's call to join the losing side built into the system. There is no reason to leave the winning side built into the system. 'The Market!' and 'PvP!' where both put forth as equalizing factors by CCP and CSM. Almost a year is enough time to show that they aren't enough. Unless numbers equalize a bit the sov war will remain lop-sided. |

Snape Dieboldmotor
In Exile. Imperial Outlaws.
10
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 15:24:00 -
[36] - Quote
If you study the kill stats you see that fw is a success. I like some of the minor tweaks mentioned in this thread, but major changes are not necessary. Fw is not broken.
|

Zarnak Wulf
In Exile. Imperial Outlaws.
1183
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 15:31:00 -
[37] - Quote
Snape Dieboldmotor wrote:If you study the kill stats you see that fw is a success. I like some of the minor tweaks mentioned in this thread, but major changes are not necessary. Fw is not broken.
Does that mean you'll cover my shift so I can spend time with my family today?   |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
1344
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 17:03:00 -
[38] - Quote
After looking at both Fweddit and Moar Tears killboards, it's kind of lolworthy that any request is being made at all. Most of their kills are in Egglehende - a system which is not in FW space. You wonder if they would get any fights in FW if they actually, say, patrolled the FW area instead of camped the high sec gates in Eggh (and then called camping high sec gates "the right kind of pvp").
+1 to In Exile. who live in Eggh, but appear to actually go looking for fights in FW.
And +1 to Amarrian Retribution who actually have the balls to live in FW space. Right now Sahtogas is getting massive numbers of fights because these guys have chosen to defend it, (and some Minmatar have chosen to attack it). This is how FW Occupancy warfare is supposed to work.
|

Cosmo Raata
T-Cells Moar Tears
31
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 17:32:00 -
[39] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:After looking at both Fweddit and Moar Tears killboards, it's kind of lolworthy that any request is being made at all. Most of their kills are in Egglehende - a system which is not in FW space. You wonder if they would get any fights in FW if they actually, say, patrolled the FW area instead of camped the high sec gates in Eggh (and then called camping high sec gates "the right kind of pvp").
+1 to In Exile. who live in Eggh, but appear to actually go looking for fights in FW.
And +1 to Amarrian Retribution who actually have the balls to live in FW space. Right now Sahtogas is getting massive numbers of fights because these guys have chosen to defend it, (and some Minmatar have chosen to attack it). This is how FW Occupancy warfare is supposed to work.
You do know we all lived in FW space before but due to TZ issues we would struggle to keep even our own system right? Literally 3 people would come in and plex all night and we'd wake up to the tune of a 30% swing.
Wulf is right in the sense that TZ is a problem, but that can't be fixed!
What really needs to happen is to stop rewarding the individual through non-pvp risk. Reward the group that is willing to use teamwork.
I mean ffs people, its named FACTIONAL WARFARE!!!!!!!!
Faction implies 1 side (a group) against another.
Warfare implies fighting.
Yet the system revolves around who can farm beacons.
Why is Minnie a larger force? People want to take advantage of the LP & rewards.
Why is Amarr losing? We try to focus on fighting and not plexing.
The system is broken, and you can call it a major fix that needs to happen or minor tweaks, but it still isn't working or if this is what CCP wants, they need to rename it because it ain't FACTIONAL WARFARE.
Maybe that is what CCP needs, a new name. How about we use this thread to help CCP rename it instead of provide good ideas that they refuse to implement?
I vote we call it:
1) Beacon Bonanza!!!
2) The LP Store
3) Factional Hide & Seek
4) Mission Control
5) Plex & Cloak
6) DeScan Spam
7) Working as Intended
Feel free to help CCP rename their work of art. |

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
890
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 17:52:00 -
[40] - Quote
Snape Dieboldmotor wrote:If you study the kill stats you see that fw is a success. I like some of the minor tweaks mentioned in this thread, but major changes are not necessary. Fw is not broken.
"Faction war" and "faction war sov" are 2 different things. Faction war sov is broken. If you look at the killoards of top vp gainers for the day (that si those with the biggest impact on sov for that day) you will see they had very little if any pvp. You will see they mostly fly pve ships. That is because running from pvp is the most effective way to gain sov under the current mechanics.
@Zarnak Why do you only consider the 4 systems that amarr hold. Don't you ever dream of holding more than 4 ssytems? The defensive plexing rabbits are just as bad if not worse than the offensive plexing rabbits. Sure they are not getting as much lp (if any at all) but they are still effecting sov just as much.
Having players roaming around trying to find these rabbits so they don't completely control sov is obviously not working. We need better tools if we want it there the be some combat in this war. Alarms or notifications or at least a map that shows where our military complexes are currently under attack is necessary. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Rommell Drako
T-Cells Moar Tears
29
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 17:53:00 -
[41] - Quote
Please bear with me. Responding to multiple people and multiple posts
Milton Middleson wrote:Quote:everything is exploitable.
It's worse than that, since it actively punishes people for trying to attack or defend. Under such a scheme, it would be better to do nothing and dplex later than to engage at a disadvantage. Quote:This is a warzone, why does PVP not matter?
Best example is the Amarr Militia and Fweddit. Fweddit has a massive amount of kills and PVPs all the time. Yet the minmatar are (were) winning the warzone due to broken farming mechanics. Why should kills directly affect a war? Wars are won by accomplishing military objective; killing the enemy is just a means to that end. Conversely, it's entirely possible to waste your time doing nothing of consequence and inflicting irrelevant losses on the opposition (this is especially true in EVE, where dying is an inconvenience). There's nothing wrong with that, but it's pretty unreasonable to insist that it also directly affect the warzone.
"No one wins a war by dying for his country. You win war by making some other dumb bastard die for his." - Patton.
While yes wars are typically won by taking positions, resources, locations, etc. But removing the number of people from the location typically is how you win a fight. See kill enough of the others so they do not have enough to continue to kill you. This is what 00 is all about. WELCOME TO ALPHA FLEET NOOB! kill enough of them and their guns cant kill you. and once there is no one but you left well guess what you just won.
Have you ever played risk? how do you take over a location? by killing all the enemys guys on it? or orbiting it while the other player is asleep? Capture the flag has a higher risk and reward system then the current FW mechanics. If you are trying to take someones flag and a enemy shows up, you cant just leave and wait 4 hours and then go to capture the flag while the other player sleeps.
FLyinghotpocket: Yes people wil try to exploit. but the amount of LP given at the kill of anything is redic miniscule. For example:
MY MATH IS AIDS by the way. I just like to use simple examples.
I killed a rifter (minmatar) with a total killboard post worth of 10.6 mil isk. I recieved a total of 481 LP for that kill. Which means for every kill I get i receive 1 LP per every 22,038 isk blown up. Now if you would like to exploit a JF (at the tune of 7 bil i am using easy numbers, this would actually cost more) to push your control... Which would give you 317,633 LP be my guest. Which by the way would be at the edge of 1/3 of the system push required. So in order to capture 1 single system you would need to kill 3 JFs in this manner. If someone wants to do the math to see if killing a JF and getting those loyalty points is worth the cost to capture a single system please let me know. IF 952,899 LP is worth 21 bil isk... which at the LP market store you are cashing out great at 1,200 isk per LP... or 1,143,478,800 is the isk value of that 952,899 LP...
So please show me how killing 21 billion in JFs is worth the 1 billion you would receive from the LP gain or the single system flip.... |

Rommell Drako
T-Cells Moar Tears
29
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 17:56:00 -
[42] - Quote
Bad Messenger wrote:FW is working fine, CCP set goal they want to achieve and stats show that they managed to do good changes.
The fact that most players had different goal what changes should do does not matter, FW is fine, get over it.
maybe if we wait couple years stats will go down after hype and CCP has to do something, other option is that players start to play FW like CCP planned, i do not see reason why that should happen, but hey who am i to see future always.
FW is an isk faucet for risk averse cloak fit atrons. If working as intended then thats fine. But it is not a Faction Warfare anymore. Low sec Missioning and beacon orbiting maybe...
If this is what CCP wants then thats fine. Just change the name.
If CCP will say on this thread that it is working as intended... that afk plexers is what they want... then I would not be surpirsed when amarr stops running a single plex, only pvps, and publicly announces that every single amarr pilot has a minni mission running alt... |

Rommell Drako
T-Cells Moar Tears
29
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 18:03:00 -
[43] - Quote
Silence iKillYouu wrote:ccp have been working on FW alot. stop crying go camp highsec stations if its to hard for u to get kills.
Huola Station has spoken...
EVEN LNA should be able to agree that the kills you get in a system should work towards the warzone... wouldnt that better your pvp and actually make staying in 1 system worthwhile instead of blatant cowardice... ind4 never able to warp to any range but 100.. |

Plato Forko
Amarrian Vengeance
16
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 18:13:00 -
[44] - Quote
automatic timer rollback is such a dumb idea. how exactly does it help reduce PvE in FW to introduce a mechanic that has the same effect as actual players defending a plex? it's no wonder CCP can't figure out what to do when people are constantly spamming with weird ideas.
you know what i'm gonna say now: nerf wild LP bonuses for plexing, buff LP for blapping enemies. if everything else stays exactly the same at the very least the farming problem will be addressed. not just LP farming either, but killmail farming as well since everyone will want as few people as necessary on each killmail to individually gain the most LP from it. i'll shut up if someone can point out a downside to that |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
1344
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 18:18:00 -
[45] - Quote
Cosmo Raata wrote: Wulf is right in the sense that TZ is a problem, but that can't be fixed!
Adding to contested levels based on kills won't solve this issue, unless the rewards for doing so are boosted to levels that are exploitable. Edit: Not saying it's a bad idea, just that it won't help you "win" FW.
The system favors a those who can put together a group of players to provide full TZ coverage. If you can do that, then the systems you target will not be won by others who run plexes during your off time (farmers or others interested in occupancy over fights). Now you know how to contest systems in the occupancy war - at least in a area near where you are going to base out of. Have at it. |

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
890
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 18:19:00 -
[46] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:After looking at both Fweddit and Moar Tears killboards, it's kind of lolworthy that any request is being made at all. Most of their kills are in Egglehende - a system which is not in FW space. You wonder if they would get any fights in FW if they actually, say, patrolled the FW area instead of camping the high sec gates in Eggh (and then called camping high sec gates "the right kind of pvp").
+1 to In Exile. who live in Eggh, but appear to actually go looking for fights in FW.
And +1 to Amarrian Retribution who actually have the balls to live in FW space. Right now Sahtogas is getting massive numbers of fights because these guys have chosen to defend it, (and some Minmatar have chosen to attack it). This is how FW Occupancy warfare is supposed to work.
Unlike your corp where you require people to orbit a plex everyday lots of people view eve as a game. They joined a war against a huge number of other players so that they can pvp. Not so they can have alts dplex a home system in atrons and run from anyone who comes to fight.
Givent the broken mechanics of fw living in a low sec non fw ssytem like egg makes sense if you are pvper. If Minmatar/gallente had more pvpers they would move in to egg too. But they want to stay safe where the enemy can't even dock ships. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Rommell Drako
T-Cells Moar Tears
30
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 18:35:00 -
[47] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Cosmo Raata wrote: Wulf is right in the sense that TZ is a problem, but that can't be fixed!
Adding to contested levels based on kills won't solve this issue, unless the rewards for doing so are boosted to levels that are exploitable. Edit: Not saying it's a bad idea, just that it won't help you "win" FW. The system favors a those who can put together a group of players to provide full TZ coverage. If you can do that, then the systems you target will not be won by others who run plexes during your off time (farmers or others interested in occupancy over fights). Now you know how to contest systems in the occupancy war - at least in a area near where you are going to base out of. Have at it.
I actually laughed at your forum warrioring... You dont understand the mechanics at all.
If we wanted to stay up into all the tzs then we would win pretty easily. the problem is we actually have jobs and RL.
So unfortunatly each TZ puts in around 5-8 hours if they want to actually dedicate to the cause. this means that any side with more TZ plexers, IE more EU and RUS vs the US then they win. no matter what. off of simple math and time.
Now do they actually have more numbers? or do they just farm better during those hours?
My point is that you dont actually have to fight to win FW. just plex with the other side is asleep in systems that they are not in. Done. Game over. Sounds good. |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
1344
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 18:49:00 -
[48] - Quote
Rommell Drako wrote:My point is that you dont actually have to fight to win FW. just plex with the other side is asleep in systems that they are not in. Done. Game over. Sounds good. You know how to solve that right? Recruit more off-TZ players to your cause. If there are none to be found, then I guess you're SOL.
There really is no other solution to the TZ coverage issue.
|

Garr Earthbender
Justified Chaos
150
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 19:02:00 -
[49] - Quote
My god, this whole post is full of troll/misunderstanding.
Cearain wrote:
Unlike your corp where you require people to orbit a plex everyday lots of people view eve as a game. They joined a war against a huge number of other players so that they can pvp. Not so they can have alts dplex a home system in atrons and run from anyone who comes to fight.
We're not required to plex, we do so cause it brings FIGHTS. We also have 'operational priorities' where we're encouraged to fight for a system or 2. It just so happens that we find fights. Lots of em actually. D plex alts are a part of FW whether you like it or not, and of COURSE they're gonna run. Why should a 0 tank 0 dps ship stay around?
Quote:Given the broken mechanics of fw living in a low sec non fw system like egg makes sense if you are pvper. If Minmatar/gallente had more pvpers they would move in to egg too. But they want to stay safe where the enemy can't even dock ships.
If I am defending a system I want an advantage. Having a station in that system that the enemy cannot dock in is an advantage. Hell, it's worse out in 0.0 where NOBODY can dock in the station except for the owning corp and renters. If the other side wants to be able to reship in enemy territory, that's what POSs are for. -Rock is overpowered, Scissors is fine. -Paper |

Juan Rayo
Justified Chaos
76
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 19:12:00 -
[50] - Quote
Cearain I wish you-¦d stop shitting on threads with your attacks on people who disagree with you because
1- Your notification idea is stupid. 2. We ACTUALLY PLAY in FW.
Now, you like numbers right? even if they don-¦t agree with you? go check Gallente Militia killboard and tell us again how JUSTK is "required to orbit buttons" all day and how we don-¦t pvp.
I should just stop feeding the troll really.
As for the issues discussed in this thread:
1. We used to have problems with 3 or 4 people coming into our system in a different timezone and plexing it up. Instead of crying to CCP about it we got a. Friends in diff timezones and b. recruited players in different timezones. Problem over.
2. This thread if nothing else proves that the stupid "notification" idea is not needed/would not work. If amarr can-¦t find "rabbits" plexing the FOUR systems they hold atm, no amount of notification spamm is gonna change that.
3. Kills affecting system contested status would be a ***** to program (I think) and would have no counterpart in all of Eve. There are other, simpler fixes proposed that a lot of people seem to agree upon: timer rollback. Hell even LP corp tax. Altho if you think FW is being farmed now imagine if we had corp LP tax... |

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
890
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 19:33:00 -
[51] - Quote
Garr Earthbender wrote:My god, this whole post is full of troll/misunderstanding. Cearain wrote:
Unlike your corp where you require people to orbit a plex everyday lots of people view eve as a game. They joined a war against a huge number of other players so that they can pvp. Not so they can have alts dplex a home system in atrons and run from anyone who comes to fight.
We're not required to plex, we do so cause it brings FIGHTS. We also have 'operational priorities' where we're encouraged to fight for a system or 2. It just so happens that we find fights. Lots of em actually.
It must have been some other gallente corp that had the required plexing.
Garr Earthbender wrote: D plex alts are a part of FW whether you like it or not, and of COURSE they're gonna run. Why should a 0 tank 0 dps ship stay around?.
Indeed this is were we disagree. I don't think the war should be won by people who have 0 tank and 0 dps and just run from every wartarget.
Obviously I don't like it that rabbits win the war. That is why I have been advocating a pvp based sov war mechanic. I understand that you and other in jk are very happy with fw sov being rabbit based. At least we identified the root of the disagreement.
Garr Earthbender wrote:Quote:Given the broken mechanics of fw living in a low sec non fw system like egg makes sense if you are pvper. If Minmatar/gallente had more pvpers they would move in to egg too. But they want to stay safe where the enemy can't even dock ships. If I am defending a system I want an advantage. Having a station in that system that the enemy cannot dock in is an advantage. Hell, it's worse out in 0.0 where NOBODY can dock in the station except for the owning corp and renters. If the other side wants to be able to reship in enemy territory, that's what POSs are for.
If you want pvp go to where both sides can have ships. If you want to win a silly carebear race where you have alts fly ships with no tank or dps so you can win, then carry on.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Milton Middleson
Rifterlings Point Blank Alliance
266
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 19:41:00 -
[52] - Quote
Rommell Drako wrote:
While yes wars are typically won by taking positions, resources, locations, etc. But removing the number of people from the location typically is how you win a fight. See kill enough of the others so they do not have enough to continue to kill you. This is what 00 is all about. WELCOME TO ALPHA FLEET NOOB! kill enough of them and their guns cant kill you. and once there is no one but you left well guess what you just won.
Have you ever played risk? how do you take over a location? by killing all the enemys guys on it? or orbiting it while the other player is asleep? Capture the flag has a higher risk and reward system then the current FW mechanics. If you are trying to take someones flag and a enemy shows up, you cant just leave and wait 4 hours and then go to capture the flag while the other player sleeps.
Your comparisons are silly. First of all, Risk is an entirely different game with an entirely different set of mechanics, so comparison is absurd. Second, Risk has an incredibly simplistic combat simulation that comes down to luck and attrition. I can't take territory in risk by outmaneuvering my opponent. CTF is slightly better, I suppose, but here's the thing: you totally can leave and come back and try later, and people do. It's just the limited temporal scope that prevents people from waiting until you're asleep. If we were playing a week-long game of CTF with no breaks, sneaking in while everyone was asleep to nick the flag would be a pretty solid strategy.
And your proposal isn't like either of those. It's demanding a direct reward for killing the enemy. The tactical reward for killing the enemy is that they aren't around to oppose you while you take your objective. If you're not capitalizing on killing the enemy, or you're just not getting kills doing something relevant, that's your failure.
I don't know if you've really grasped this yet, but the problem you're attacking is insoluble so long as EVE players don't all play in the same timezone. And believe it or not, it extends to other things besides FW. |

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
890
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 20:03:00 -
[53] - Quote
Juan Rayo wrote:Cearain I wish you-¦d stop shitting on threads with your attacks on people who disagree with you because
1- Your notification idea is stupid. 2. We ACTUALLY PLAY in FW.
Now, you like numbers right? even if they don-¦t agree with you? go check Gallente Militia killboard and tell us again how JUSTK is "required to orbit buttons" all day and how we don-¦t pvp..
I have already seen it. Now you go look at the top five vp gainers for the day and tell me what their killboard looks like. They are the ones who are having the largest impact on fw sov. Or is it you who refuses to look at the data?
Notifications are a horrible idea if you want to win the war with rabbits that constantly run from pvp. I see yoru militia is doing quite well under the current hide and seek plexing mechanics so i am not surprised you don't like the idea. (its not even my idea anyway)
Juan Rayo wrote: I should just stop feeding the troll really.
As for the issues discussed in this thread:
1. We used to have problems with 3 or 4 people coming into our system in a different timezone and plexing it up. Instead of crying to CCP about it we got a. Friends in diff timezones and b. recruited players in different timezones. Problem over.
2. This thread if nothing else proves that the stupid "notification" idea is not needed/would not work. If amarr can-¦t find "rabbits" plexing the FOUR systems they hold atm, no amount of notification spamm is gonna change that..
The warzone is actually 70 systems. Not 4. You again demonstrate how afraid you are that the enemy will know where all your rabbits are plexing and so they might actually have to fight a war instead of carebear it.
Juan Rayo wrote: 3. Kills affecting system contested status would be a ***** to program (I think) and would have no counterpart in all of Eve. There are other, simpler fixes proposed that a lot of people seem to agree upon: timer rollback. Hell even LP corp tax. Altho if you think FW is being farmed now imagine if we had corp LP tax...
Edit: missed something that XG mentioned and I-¦d like to repeat: look at the Amarr in Sahtogas. They are fighting for their system, getting lots of action and (one would think) fun. Imagine if more Amarr alliances/corps dared moved to lowsec and help each other out. FW pvp AND sov right there.
Sahtogas is heating up recently but it traditionally isn't even one of the top pvp systems on that front. Usuually its just lots of boring dplexing. You and your corp may be fine with that, (and cry bloody murder anytime someone suggests changes that would make the war pvp) but others want to actually fight a war. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Juan Rayo
Justified Chaos
77
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 20:33:00 -
[54] - Quote
Cearain wrote: but others want to actually fight a war.
When you say "others" you understand you are talking about US right? the ones actually fighting and actually IN fw? |

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
890
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 21:13:00 -
[55] - Quote
Juan Rayo wrote:Cearain wrote: but others want to actually fight a war. When you say "others" you understand you are talking about US right? the ones actually fighting and actually IN fw?
No not you. You are the ones who want to make sure your rabbits can hide and avoid all pvp as they win sov. You are the ones who continually argue that rabbit plexing is fine, and always cry out when anyone suggests changes that would end it.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Tsobai Hashimoto
Mayhem and Ruin
138
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 21:43:00 -
[56] - Quote
Rommell Drako wrote:Bad Messenger wrote:FW is working fine, CCP set goal they want to achieve and stats show that they managed to do good changes.
The fact that most players had different goal what changes should do does not matter, FW is fine, get over it.
maybe if we wait couple years stats will go down after hype and CCP has to do something, other option is that players start to play FW like CCP planned, i do not see reason why that should happen, but hey who am i to see future always. FW is an isk faucet for risk averse cloak fit atrons. If working as intended then thats fine. But it is not a Faction Warfare anymore. Low sec Missioning and beacon orbiting maybe... If this is what CCP wants then thats fine. Just change the name. If CCP will say on this thread that it is working as intended... that afk plexers is what they want... then I would not be surpirsed when amarr stops running a single plex, only pvps, and publicly announces that every single amarr pilot has a minni mission running alt...
that is exactly what im thinking about doing
how much would two pilots cost me at the bazzar that can fly sb?
wouldnt even need extra accounts to pay for plex. transfer one to my main one on my alt and bam....run minnie missions once or twice a week. make a bill a week and get **** killed
**** thats a great idea lol
|

chatgris
Quantum Cats Syndicate Samurai Pizza Cats
470
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 21:46:00 -
[57] - Quote
Cearain wrote:Juan Rayo wrote:Cearain wrote: but others want to actually fight a war. When you say "others" you understand you are talking about US right? the ones actually fighting and actually IN fw? No not you. You are the ones who want to make sure your rabbits can hide and avoid all pvp as they win sov. You are the ones who continually argue that rabbit plexing is fine, and always cry out when anyone suggests changes that would end it.
We made a channel for you to tell you where our stabbed deplexing alts were, and I don't think you ever even joined. I was broadcasting over and over "Merlin in _____ plex in Notoras" with my alt. |

ALUCARD 1208
Spiritus Draconis Sicarius Draconis
172
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 22:42:00 -
[58] - Quote
Rommell Drako wrote:
If we wanted to stay up into all the tzs then we would win pretty easily. the problem is we actually have jobs and RL.
So unfortunatly each TZ puts in around 5-8 hours if they want to actually dedicate to the cause. this means that any side with more TZ plexers, IE more EU and RUS vs the US then they win. no matter what. off of simple math and time.
I had to laugh at this.
Right ofc if you want to win u have to have coverage of TZs  or should we ask ccp chatgris just to spawn plexes wenever your online so u can work till your hearts content and noone have a chance to undo the plexing youve done? 
or we could ask ccp for a pause button so the whole of eve stops wen u guys arnt logged on GÖÑ HIGH FIVES GÖÑ-á |

Klazktrknuitzksalikamono
Hedion University Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 23:03:00 -
[59] - Quote
HI HELLO THIS IS PINKY AMARR FW FLAGSHIP
PICTUR
YEA DATS WHAT WE TALKIN' ABOUT |

Mr Dynamic
University of Caille Gallente Federation
6
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 23:11:00 -
[60] - Quote
Klazktrknuitzksalikamono wrote:
SMUG SMUG SMUG SMUG
NOMAD PLS NOMAD PLS NOMAD PLS NOMAD PLS NOMAD PLS NOMAD PLS NOMAD PLS NOMAD PLS NOMAD PLS NOMAD PLS every other bid in this thread is an alt of mine, pick the cheapest one and I'll pay that much.-á |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 .. 11 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |