| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 .. 11 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Cosmo Raata
T-Cells Moar Tears
24
|
Posted - 2013.04.27 18:51:00 -
[1] - Quote
Do all of us agree on what FW should look like? No.
Does the name Factional Warfare imply fighting occurs? Yes.
Is the "Warfare" the main theme in Factional Warfare? No.
So CCP, read some ideas and choose to do something, who cares if you please everyone. Fact of the matter is you look like scared children afraid of losing subscriptions instead of the awesome juggernauts in the PVP MMO industry you used to be. Stop waiting for something like Dust to help, stop worrying that it won't work right and it might get exploited. DO SOMETHING DIFFERENT ALREADY!
Been playing 10 years. I get it that you believe in making your decisions more carefully now than you used to, but damn. We shouldn't have to wait 2 years for things like this to be fixed because you gotta figure out how to please everyone.
What stupid new thing you doing this next patch? More exploration? Really?!?! Damn, can we get more boring than that? Maybe change the name to PVE online instead of EVE online.
WAKE UP CCP! |

michael chasseur
Fweddit I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
2
|
Posted - 2013.04.27 18:54:00 -
[2] - Quote
WTB corporate LP tax |

Antoni Cesaille
Fweddit I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
0
|
Posted - 2013.04.27 18:58:00 -
[3] - Quote
I agree. Something really needs to be done about factional warfare. Its sort of broken.
Doesn't make any sense that you call it warfare when all you have to do is just run from the opposite faction and then come back when they leave and dplex down any progress they made. |

Sgt Star Vyvorant
Rubella Solaris I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
8
|
Posted - 2013.04.27 19:10:00 -
[4] - Quote
I approve of this message! |

Achamian Zanjoahir
Fweddit I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
0
|
Posted - 2013.04.27 19:12:00 -
[5] - Quote
Yeah really, put the WARFARE in FW! |

Achamian Zanjoahir
Fweddit I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
0
|
Posted - 2013.04.27 19:14:00 -
[6] - Quote
How about a 1 ship per faction max in novices so we could get some 1 on 1 pvp |

Cedric en Chasteaux
AmServe
0
|
Posted - 2013.04.27 19:23:00 -
[7] - Quote
CMON CCP, just try something. Like resetting the the timer when someone warps out, so there is an incentive to actually fight. At the moment warp core stabbed, plex farmers are destroying FW. One side becomes sucessfull, so everyone joins to fight for them, reducing the chance of the other side even competing.
Also what about a corporate LP tax, so Corps can fund free ship programmes and welcome more people to FW?
STOP JUST SITTING ON YOUR HANDS DOING NOTHING!! TRY SOMETHING, ANYTHING |

Morgan Torry
Arma Purgatorium Templis Dragonaors
133
|
Posted - 2013.04.27 19:53:00 -
[8] - Quote
michael chasseur wrote:WTB corporate LP tax
I'd sign on to this. Arma Purgatorium - For the State, For the Corporation Faction Warfare, PvP, Training
|

chatgris
Quantum Cats Syndicate Samurai Pizza Cats
469
|
Posted - 2013.04.27 20:03:00 -
[9] - Quote
Timer rollback to starting state when no-one is in the plex. In order for the timer to run, a ship of the maximum size allowed in the plex needs to be there.
Those two things would make a huge dent against farmers. While you're at it, I wouldn't mind disallowing stabbed ships the ability to activate the warp gates, but that's probably not sandboxy enough for CCP's liking. |

Milton Middleson
Rifterlings Point Blank Alliance
266
|
Posted - 2013.04.27 21:02:00 -
[10] - Quote
Antoni Cesaille wrote: Doesn't make any sense that you call it warfare when all you have to do is just run from the opposite faction and then come back when they leave and dplex down any progress they made.
It's really frustrating that people who play in different timezones than me are able to try and defend their systems.
Quote:How about a 1 ship per faction max in novices so we could get some 1 on 1 pvp
No.
Quote:Timer rollback to starting state when no-one is in the plex. In order for the timer to run, a ship of the maximum size allowed in the plex needs to be there.
This is better. It actually makes ejecting hostile plexers more time efficient for the defenders than dplexing later. |

Cosmo Raata
T-Cells Moar Tears
27
|
Posted - 2013.04.27 21:28:00 -
[11] - Quote
Hey Guys.
This Forum is full of great ideas already, plenty of which CCP can choose from.
The point is that CCP needs to take a dump or get of the pot. Do something or just get rid of FW all together and stop wasting our time.
And i'm not saying the ideas you are putting in here aren't good, but its clear that CCP reads stuff, they just do nothing with our ideas. Personally, if I don't hear about some changes to FW I'm either
a) making it a goal to ruin FW by banding both sides of the faction together to exploit the crap out of it and make CCP do something
or
b) Just leaving it all together.
We refuse to keep paying for little to no fix each 6 months, DO SOMETHING CCP or you'll see player rise together to ruin what you have put together already. |

Mathrin
Synthetic Solution Synthetic Systems
68
|
Posted - 2013.04.27 21:32:00 -
[12] - Quote
Cosmo Raata wrote:Do all of us agree on what FW should look like? No.
Does the name Factional Warfare imply fighting occurs? Yes.
Is the "Warfare" the main theme in Factional Warfare? No.
So CCP, read some ideas and choose to do something, who cares if you please everyone. Fact of the matter is you look like scared children afraid of losing subscriptions instead of the awesome juggernauts in the PVP MMO industry you used to be. Stop waiting for something like Dust to help, stop worrying that it won't work right and it might get exploited. DO SOMETHING DIFFERENT ALREADY!
Been playing 10 years. I get it that you believe in making your decisions more carefully now than you used to, but damn. We shouldn't have to wait 2 years for things like this to be fixed because you gotta figure out how to please everyone.
What stupid new thing you doing this next patch? More exploration? Really?!?! Damn, can we get more boring than that? Maybe change the name to PVE online instead of EVE online.
WAKE UP CCP!
Maybe they are doing something. They know they Cant please everyone. Did you ever think maybe you are one of the people they decided not to please? |

Cosmo Raata
T-Cells Moar Tears
27
|
Posted - 2013.04.27 21:42:00 -
[13] - Quote
Mathrin wrote:Cosmo Raata wrote:Do all of us agree on what FW should look like? No.
Does the name Factional Warfare imply fighting occurs? Yes.
Is the "Warfare" the main theme in Factional Warfare? No.
So CCP, read some ideas and choose to do something, who cares if you please everyone. Fact of the matter is you look like scared children afraid of losing subscriptions instead of the awesome juggernauts in the PVP MMO industry you used to be. Stop waiting for something like Dust to help, stop worrying that it won't work right and it might get exploited. DO SOMETHING DIFFERENT ALREADY!
Been playing 10 years. I get it that you believe in making your decisions more carefully now than you used to, but damn. We shouldn't have to wait 2 years for things like this to be fixed because you gotta figure out how to please everyone.
What stupid new thing you doing this next patch? More exploration? Really?!?! Damn, can we get more boring than that? Maybe change the name to PVE online instead of EVE online.
WAKE UP CCP! Maybe they are doing something. They know they Cant please everyone. Did you ever think maybe you are one of the people they decided not to please?
LOL. CCP alt detected, damage control in effect.
If not, don't be stupid, its not like FW is the only thing they can't seem to fix or drag their hands attempting to fix it. Null is broken, Empire wars are broken....Almost everything PvP related is broken. |

Juan Rayo
Justified Chaos
75
|
Posted - 2013.04.27 21:58:00 -
[14] - Quote
FW is getting much more fighting in the past months. That means fun for everyone involved and therefore I would not call it "broken".
Does it need some fixes still? for sure. I-¦d love to see some of the ideas expressed elsewhere and in this thread, to wit:
As Chatgris said:
1. Timer rollback to starting state when no-one is in the plex. 2. In order for the timer to run, a ship of the maximum size allowed in the plex needs to be there.
And as Michael Chasseur said:
3. Wtb corporate lp tax. |

Cosmo Raata
T-Cells Moar Tears
27
|
Posted - 2013.04.27 22:13:00 -
[15] - Quote
Juan Rayo wrote:FW is getting much more fighting in the past months. That means fun for everyone involved and therefore I would not call it "broken".
Does it need some fixes still? for sure. I-¦d love to see some of the ideas expressed elsewhere and in this thread, to wit:
As Chatgris said:
1. Timer rollback to starting state when no-one is in the plex. 2. In order for the timer to run, a ship of the maximum size allowed in the plex needs to be there.
And as Michael Chasseur said:
3. Wtb corporate lp tax.
The fighting that is happening is simply due to giving up on trying to obtain system control. Eventually those fights will stop because the PVE'ing side has isk while the PVP'ing side runs out. And if you want to claim that more PVP has happened, show some proof instead of just claiming it has.
|

Perkin Warbeck
Amarrian Space Poodles 24eme Legion Etrangere
126
|
Posted - 2013.04.27 22:28:00 -
[16] - Quote
But don't you know. CCP has now fixed null sec mining so that all the nullbears will do that rather than endlessly orbit buttons in FW plexes for a crap ton of LP. Isn't that awesome!!!
Oh wait...... |

Zarnak Wulf
In Exile. Imperial Outlaws.
1182
|
Posted - 2013.04.27 22:51:00 -
[17] - Quote
I'm going to hop on here before the thread becomes derailed with cries of "Tears!" and before the usual suspects take it over and derail it. OP is in a group that has recently decided to plex for Amarr to try to turn the fortunes of the battlefield. For that I'm really appreciative. But as you enter the 'plexfield' you have begun to notice things that other groups have been aware of for a while.
Amarr Euro TZ numbers are very sparse. Until that gets fixed Amarr will have difficulties with the sov war. Full stop. Period. Siseide, Dal, and Vard didn't fall because there weren't aggressive, competent pilots working together to defend it. It fell because we owned the field for 8-10 hours and Rusmatar owned it for 12 - 14 hours. It turned into a 'you plex, we plex' situation with an inevitable conclusion. The pilots in our off period did a fantastic job defending it. We had a five to one kill ratio in our favor and that's being generous to the Minmatar. It was probably much higher then that. Rusmatar pilots also said it best when they where plexing Sisiede as we pushed them out every night. "We don't need to fight you. We'll just plex when you're sleeping."
If you want to play the sov game you need a TZ buddy. US pushes. Euro defends, spoils, or perhaps if fortune is bright, pushes on their TZ as well. Imperial Outlaws are still looking for a TZ buddy. Please contact Shalee or Almity if you agree with what I say and would like to talk.
If you want real progress - these are some proposals or things in motion that might help:
Fix Null - People, corps, and alliances don't leave because there are no other real choices being offered to them.
Remove OGB - Veterans on both sides farm the crap out of new people entering FW. Those people leave. It makes it very hard to build a Euro TZ when those people have to enter being self sufficient killers. There is no room for error in that time zone.
Put tools in the LP store to help the losing side. I-HUB upgrades to slow plex spawns would be something I have suggested in the past.
Make kills move the contested bar in addition to plexes run. If we got credit for all the farmers in Sisiede we murdered we'd still own it!  I don't have a lot of hope that anything more then the first two points will be addressed.
|

Cosmo Raata
T-Cells Moar Tears
27
|
Posted - 2013.04.27 23:50:00 -
[18] - Quote
I mean, I can supply ideas that would help fix things, I just don't feel like there is a lack of good ideas.
#1 Dynamic beacon timers based on pilot number orbiting. 1 pilot = a 0.1x multiplier. 10 pilots = a 1.0x multiplier. 50 pilots = 5x multiplier. This would help with the individual pilots just in it to rack up LP and do nothing to support the FW aspect of things.
#2 Increase timer on beacons to allow more time to respond, but reduce overall time necessary to flip system.
#3 When system is vulnerable, give reward to saving force and drop conquered system percentage to 50% (This will make people stay to fight).
#4 Give tools to either the largest corps/alliances in FW such as "Systems currently under attack". This would help fights occur by means of showing where the fight could happen.
$5 When beacon is abandoned due to pvp avoidance, either drop timer back to zero or have it countdown automatically as soon as pilot leaves. Also, try to perhaps reward the defenders with LP if they stay.
#6 Instead of just upgrades for station services, how about tangible upgrades to help support defense and/or other useful needs. Example: Multiplier change on timers in already upgraded systems to allow faction to have a home base that isn't invaded by off time zone single pilots farming it.
So there are some ideas, but again, I could care less if CCP likes my ideas or not, I just demand SOME change. |

Shadow Adanza
Quantum Cats Syndicate Samurai Pizza Cats
70
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 00:12:00 -
[19] - Quote
Cosmo Raata wrote: And if you want to claim that more PVP has happened, show some proof instead of just claiming it has.
Look at QCats killboard. We've averaged more kills per month since the patch. Delicious pvp. Hey! You're no zombie! |

Tsobai Hashimoto
Mayhem and Ruin
136
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 00:15:00 -
[20] - Quote
I do agree that FW is broken and needs to be fix..... but......dont whine that its just PvE, that is what CCP wants...i mean...it is in the business tab after all LOL 
Zarnak Wulf wrote:I'm going to hop on here before the thread becomes derailed with cries of "Tears!" and before the usual suspects take it over and derail it. If you want real progress - these are some proposals or things in motion that might help: Fix Null - People, corps, and alliances don't leave because there are no other real choices being offered to them.
Remove OGB - Veterans on both sides farm the crap out of new people entering FW. Those people leave. It makes it very hard to build a Euro TZ when those people have to enter being self sufficient killers. There is no room for error in that time zone.
Put tools in the LP store to help the losing side. I-HUB upgrades to slow plex spawns would be something I have suggested in the past.
Make kills move the contested bar in addition to plexes run. If we got credit for all the farmers in Sisiede we murdered we'd still own it!
I don't have a lot of hope that anything more then the first two points will be addressed.
I bolded the parts that I agree....fix null, fix WH pay........FW is better isk than both but only if your on the winning side......can make 200m an hour running a perfect purifier in Minnine FW L4s (if not more)
Change up the Tier rewards, you need winners to feel like they are winning, but right now its to big of a boost. I also think that it shouldn't be a straight 20% of control for each tier T1 - Under 15% control. -25% LP T2 - 15%-35% Control . Even T3 - 35%-65% +50% T4 - 65% - 85% +100% T5 - 85%+ +150%
This makes is easier to pull out of T1 or at least stay in T2....it also makes T3 the baseline for the WZ, Both sides should be exchanging between T2 and T3 80% of the time
Put in a rollback timer if there is no one to move the timer, even if it is at half speed....and moves to full speed with a defender. Stopped with a member from each side is present.
FW corps tax takes from FW LP, and only FW LP....NPC corp takes 14% that (is gone)..... if a FW corp leaves FW, any unused LPs are lost.
Allow a FW corp to have SOV in the WZ.....it is still under militia control, but the SOV holders get increased benefits, even cheaper JC, industry tabs only useable by the Corp etc, cheaper market transactions
Holding SOV costs LP from the corp..... maybe a bit of isk too...but mostly LP
Corp Holding FW SOV can upgrade I-HUB with items, items are bought with ISK and LP.........could be expanded to be made with BPOs with PI goods and installed using LP (will expand PI income and help dust mercs, make planets worth more)
Corp upgrades would be simple and small but could be useful... NPC rats increase dmg +10%..... NPC Rat HP +10%..... increase max buffer in I-Hub by 100k LP etc
Im sure the FW SOV will be flamed but I like it, allows players more options to interact with the landscape and feel ownership. Everyone could already see the systems that would be held right now, and by whom
But even without the SOV holding, a FW Corp LP tax is needed, for the same reason we have NPC and Corp Taxes in the first place, it builds a community of players, and makes the group stronger
Tsobai
|

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
890
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 03:45:00 -
[21] - Quote
The way to make fw sov pvp has been well known for years. Notifications and timer rollbacks and its fixed. Its that simple.
I am not sure why people are saying corporate lp tax will change anything. Won't people who don't want to pay it just start their own corp for their alts?
I know some people say it's pvp already look at this or that killboard. But those people with the most kills on any given day are not the same people who run plexes. If you want to see if the fw sov game is pvp look at the daily top vp gainers' killboard, for the day they earned the vp. The killboards of the top vp gainers would look allot different if we had notifications and rollbacks. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Rommell Drako
T-Cells Moar Tears
28
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 05:03:00 -
[22] - Quote
CCP should just make a change where it makes the warzone a warzone instead of low sec mission running.
Instead of ranting I want to make one simple idea known.
I think that kills made in Solar system should be applied to the control of that solar system. Math and explanation:
To win control of a system you must gain 100% control (put system into vulnerable) and kill the ihub.
Each plex that you complete (orbit a beacon for 10, 15, 20 or 25 min.) gives you .7% additional movement towards control (towards caputering of defending.)
For easy math (and simplicity of overall thought) all math is done at T1 control. Novice - 10 min - 5,000 LP Small - 15 min - 8,000 LP medium - 20 min - 12,700 LP
So if I do the easy math which is running the Novice sites only: this is simple showing not exact numbers:
To push the system to 100% from 0% would take 143 sites. (novice sites) 5,000 LP per site (5,000 x 143 = 715000) 715,000 LP given to pilots for 100% control of a system. If you earn LP for PVP kills (which is based off of the insurance payout) then those LP payments should be matched and paid into the ihub and used towards the max % of flip.
IE: Killing a hurricane gives (lets say) 5,000 LP payout. That means that the pilots involved receive 5,000 LP and the ihub receives 5,000 LP towards the max of 715,000 or whatever arbitrary number CCP wants to give it.
This would bring PVP into the front line where pvp actually matters. Killing a enemy BS fleet is worth more then 5 hours of sitting afk with a cloak frig plexing.
Since the payouts are based on insurance payouts (dont quote me but im pretty sure its either insurance or its the amount of the ship value x some %. Since LP payouts are always a fraction of the ship kill this will prevent people from abusing it since it will not be worth the isk loss.
This is a warzone, why does PVP not matter?
Best example is the Amarr Militia and Fweddit. Fweddit has a massive amount of kills and PVPs all the time. Yet the minmatar are (were) winning the warzone due to broken farming mechanics.
This brings this question to my mind:
"IS THIS A WARZONE OR IS THIS LOWSEC MISSION RUNNING?" |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
1343
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 05:51:00 -
[23] - Quote
chatgris wrote:Timer rollback to starting state when no-one is in the plex. Timer rollback at 2x or 3x rate. If some dude wants to sit in the plex cloaked up, then he can really be griefed by the other side sitting there running the timer back quickly.
Anyways, easy enough of a fix.
|

Flyinghotpocket
Amarrian Vengeance
115
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 06:22:00 -
[24] - Quote
Rommell Drako wrote:CCP should just make a change where it makes the warzone a warzone instead of low sec mission running.
Instead of ranting I want to make one simple idea known.
I think that kills made in Solar system should be applied to the control of that solar system. Math and explanation:
To win control of a system you must gain 100% control (put system into vulnerable) and kill the ihub.
Each plex that you complete (orbit a beacon for 10, 15, 20 or 25 min.) gives you .7% additional movement towards control (towards caputering of defending.)
For easy math (and simplicity of overall thought) all math is done at T1 control. Novice - 10 min - 5,000 LP Small - 15 min - 8,000 LP medium - 20 min - 12,700 LP
So if I do the easy math which is running the Novice sites only: this is simple showing not exact numbers:
To push the system to 100% from 0% would take 143 sites. (novice sites) 5,000 LP per site (5,000 x 143 = 715000) 715,000 LP given to pilots for 100% control of a system. If you earn LP for PVP kills (which is based off of the insurance payout) then those LP payments should be matched and paid into the ihub and used towards the max % of flip.
IE: Killing a hurricane gives (lets say) 5,000 LP payout. That means that the pilots involved receive 5,000 LP and the ihub receives 5,000 LP towards the max of 715,000 or whatever arbitrary number CCP wants to give it.
This would bring PVP into the front line where pvp actually matters. Killing a enemy BS fleet is worth more then 5 hours of sitting afk with a cloak frig plexing.
Since the payouts are based on insurance payouts (dont quote me but im pretty sure its either insurance or its the amount of the ship value x some %. Since LP payouts are always a fraction of the ship kill this will prevent people from abusing it since it will not be worth the isk loss.
This is a warzone, why does PVP not matter?
Best example is the Amarr Militia and Fweddit. Fweddit has a massive amount of kills and PVPs all the time. Yet the minmatar are (were) winning the warzone due to broken farming mechanics.
This brings this question to my mind:
"IS THIS A WARZONE OR IS THIS LOWSEC MISSION RUNNING?"
this is about warfare. i like this idea.
Here ima start the trolling for you before any1 else.
lets say the more isk the ship costs/bigger the ship the more LP/vp put into bunker towards vuln.
i can totaly see somebody having jump freighter alts join enemy militia, kill their own alts. bam system vuln and your titan brigde fleet jumps in and takes system within seconds.
everything is exploitable.
|

Colt Blackhawk
The Amarrian Expendables
118
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 06:26:00 -
[25] - Quote
+1 but we all know CCP gives a f...
FW is actually a "stabbed cloaky ship" game. Nothing else. |

Milton Middleson
Rifterlings Point Blank Alliance
266
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 06:38:00 -
[26] - Quote
Quote:everything is exploitable.
It's worse than that, since it actively punishes people for trying to attack or defend. Under such a scheme, it would be better to do nothing and dplex later than to engage at a disadvantage.
Quote:This is a warzone, why does PVP not matter?
Best example is the Amarr Militia and Fweddit. Fweddit has a massive amount of kills and PVPs all the time. Yet the minmatar are (were) winning the warzone due to broken farming mechanics. Why should kills directly affect a war? Wars are won by accomplishing military objective; killing the enemy is just a means to that end. Conversely, it's entirely possible to waste your time doing nothing of consequence and inflicting irrelevant losses on the opposition (this is especially true in EVE, where dying is an inconvenience). There's nothing wrong with that, but it's pretty unreasonable to insist that it also directly affect the warzone. |

Bad Messenger
Nasranite Watch
440
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 06:48:00 -
[27] - Quote
FW is working fine, CCP set goal they want to achieve and stats show that they managed to do good changes.
The fact that most players had different goal what changes should do does not matter, FW is fine, get over it.
maybe if we wait couple years stats will go down after hype and CCP has to do something, other option is that players start to play FW like CCP planned, i do not see reason why that should happen, but hey who am i to see future always. |

Takanuro
The Amarrian Expendables
22
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 08:03:00 -
[28] - Quote
So many threads have urged CCP to do something, can't recall us ever having a DEV response in any of them. Many of us care about FW though so have to support these calls.
There are many great ideas and it is true that changes cannot make everyone happy. May own take on the situation is that the ISK earning potential needs to be crushed so that:
1. You can earn enough to fund PVP. But really, who needs 500+mil a day to PVP!?! 2. It is not the most lucrative PVE activity in EVE. 3. The winners do not have such an advantage that allies will becomes enemies just for ISK (extremely bad mechanics)
So for this I suggest:
T0 = Base LP T1 = +5% T2 = +10% T3 = +15% T4 = +20% T5 = +25%
This is still very healthy ISK potential to maintain a nice hangar of ships and maintains some incentive for Sov (we have another Tier Bonuses that should matter as much) whilst not being over the top.
Pilots in EVE spend a lot of time and effort to get an extra 3-5% advantage in their activities so I am not sure why FW currently involves bonuses and penalties like +225% and -50%.
Just flatten the playing field a little. No need for code re-writing or anything fancy to at least try this, and should hopefully make FW less of a farmville.
Yes, we're going to die, but you're coming with us!
The Amarrian Expendables are Recruiting |

greg01
Inglorious-Basterds Southern Renegades
5
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 08:13:00 -
[29] - Quote
There are alot of good ideas on this thread from both sides. These ideas come from most pilots that actually know what they are talking about. I really hope CCP are listening and start to make these changes?
Just a few points from me....
1. Make the farmers work harder for their lp (we'll never get rid of farmers) and if they are forced to fight for a plex then all the better. i.e. timer rollback put in place.etc.more npc spawning like it used tom be.see below....
2. I'd also like to make a point that I do miss the amount of npc's that used to spawn inside a plex. Not only was this useful when collecting tags but it made taking a plex slightly longer giving the enemy a chance to take it back. i.e. more PvP for them Pvp'rs.
3. I also think the warp in point is too close. It was too far before but CCP seem to have made it too close. Put it somewhere in the middle so that even an armour based fleet/ship can stand a chance against a kitey fleet/ship that may or may not have got in their first.
4. Separate The four militia factions from each other. Amarr from Caldari and Gallente from Minmatar. This would be alot fairer and stop the hoardes of Minmatar farmers wreaking havoc in Caldari space. I'd like to see how the gallente get on without their FARMING MILITIA, sorry I mean Minmatar allies. If they all go gallente then fine, it may allow the Amarr some breathing space.
**Please, please CCP just do something because the current setup needs a wee tweak.**
|

Colt Blackhawk
The Amarrian Expendables
118
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 08:27:00 -
[30] - Quote
Takanuro wrote:So many threads have urged CCP to do something, can't recall us ever having a DEV response in any of them. Many of us care about FW though so have to support these calls.
There are many great ideas and it is true that changes cannot make everyone happy. May own take on the situation is that the ISK earning potential needs to be crushed so that:
1. You can earn enough to fund PVP. But really, who needs 500+mil a day to PVP!?! 2. It is not the most lucrative PVE activity in EVE. 3. The winners do not have such an advantage that allies will becomes enemies just for ISK (extremely bad mechanics)
So for this I suggest:
T0 = Base LP T1 = +5% T2 = +10% T3 = +15% T4 = +20% T5 = +25%
This is still very healthy ISK potential to maintain a nice hangar of ships and maintains some incentive for Sov (we have another Tier Bonuses that should matter as much) whilst not being over the top.
Pilots in EVE spend a lot of time and effort to get an extra 3-5% advantage in their activities so I am not sure why FW currently involves bonuses and penalties like +225% and -50%.
Just flatten the playing field a little. No need for code re-writing or anything fancy to at least try this, and should hopefully make FW less of a farmville.
+1 And timer rollbacks please. Plus fix fw missions. Minnies have (from wat I have heard) the easiest fw missions with crazy amounts of isk.
|

Silence iKillYouu
KA POW POW Inc Late Night Alliance
237
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 10:03:00 -
[31] - Quote
ccp have been working on FW alot. stop crying go camp highsec stations if its to hard for u to get kills. EVE Mail me i dont check forums often. |

Colt Blackhawk
The Amarrian Expendables
118
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 10:15:00 -
[32] - Quote
Silence iKillYouu wrote:ccp have been working on FW alot. stop crying go camp highsec stations if its to hard for u to get kills.
I want good fights not f..t..d kills. All the actual system gave us are noob minnie billionaires, plexing everything with stabby cloaky ships to hell, getting 3b pods and boosters and then blobbing everything to hell. If that doesn-¦t work they return to their stabby cloaky ships again.... FW is like belt mining^^
|

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
890
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 12:17:00 -
[33] - Quote
Rommell Drako wrote:CCP should just make a change where it makes the warzone a warzone instead of low sec mission running.
Instead of ranting I want to make one simple idea known.
I think that kills made in Solar system should be applied to the control of that solar system. Math and explanation:
To win control of a system you must gain 100% control (put system into vulnerable) and kill the ihub.
Each plex that you complete (orbit a beacon for 10, 15, 20 or 25 min.) gives you .7% additional movement towards control (towards caputering of defending.)
For easy math (and simplicity of overall thought) all math is done at T1 control. Novice - 10 min - 5,000 LP Small - 15 min - 8,000 LP medium - 20 min - 12,700 LP
So if I do the easy math which is running the Novice sites only: this is simple showing not exact numbers:
To push the system to 100% from 0% would take 143 sites. (novice sites) 5,000 LP per site (5,000 x 143 = 715000) 715,000 LP given to pilots for 100% control of a system. If you earn LP for PVP kills (which is based off of the insurance payout) then those LP payments should be matched and paid into the ihub and used towards the max % of flip.
IE: Killing a hurricane gives (lets say) 5,000 LP payout. That means that the pilots involved receive 5,000 LP and the ihub receives 5,000 LP towards the max of 715,000 or whatever arbitrary number CCP wants to give it.
This would bring PVP into the front line where pvp actually matters. Killing a enemy BS fleet is worth more then 5 hours of sitting afk with a cloak frig plexing.
Since the payouts are based on insurance payouts (dont quote me but im pretty sure its either insurance or its the amount of the ship value x some %. Since LP payouts are always a fraction of the ship kill this will prevent people from abusing it since it will not be worth the isk loss.
This is a warzone, why does PVP not matter?
Best example is the Amarr Militia and Fweddit. Fweddit has a massive amount of kills and PVPs all the time. Yet the minmatar are (were) winning the warzone due to broken farming mechanics.
This brings this question to my mind:
"IS THIS A WARZONE OR IS THIS LOWSEC MISSION RUNNING?"
Victory Points (VP) are what is collected to change sov in fw. LP are currently seperate. Currently a larger plex gives more lp but the same vp.
You can add lp to a hub to increase your level of control of a system. But not vp.
But I think its clear from your post that you want people to get some vp for kills in a system. (I'm not trying to be pedantic, just tryign to make usre I understand what you are proposing) I think that would be ok unless it were so focused on kills that:
1)People would hold onto sov by denying the enemy kills in a system such as by only plexing in stabbed ships.
2) The plex pvp becomes replaced with gate camping since its much easier to get kills by gate camping. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
890
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 13:05:00 -
[34] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:chatgris wrote:Timer rollback to starting state when no-one is in the plex. Timer rollback at 2x or 3x rate. If some dude wants to sit in the plex cloaked up, then he can really be griefed by the other side sitting there running the timer back quickly. Anyways, easy enough of a fix.
I am not sure it will fix it, but it will definitely be an improvement. It seems gallente have replaced the atron as their rabbit ship of choice with the comet. I am getting about 4 warp away commets per 1 that will fight.
One other point. I think the problem with fw sov is "rabbits" not just "farmers." Both always warp away but farmers are in it for the lp rabbits are in it to win sov. They are both a huge problem imo. There are just as many defensive plexers who warp away as offensive plexers.
Adding npcs or buffing them won't effect that at all. And will likely just make it worse for pvpers - like it was before inferno. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Zarnak Wulf
In Exile. Imperial Outlaws.
1183
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 14:23:00 -
[35] - Quote
The problem with sovereignty in FW is more due to TZ discrepancies then farmers at this time. You don't need an alarm system to tell you where the farmers are right now. Amarr owns 4 systems. Take a 10 minute AFK and you'll come back to them thick as flies. Go to bed and wake up to 15% contested.
The PvP side is really okay. Minmatar had over 5900 pilots in it's ranks as of yesterday. Amarr had a bit over 3700. Despite being outnumbered by over 2k pilots Amarr consistently gets more kills. I can log on and find a fight within minutes. When I was in Minmatar I struggled to get 100 kills a month. I pretty consistently get 200 kills a month in Amarr militia. Amarr militia at least is a PvP paradise.
The isk isn't bad on the Amarr side either- despite our tier one status. I pretty consistently bounce between 2 and 4 billion isk by just cashing in LP.
The issue is that there is no siren's call to join the losing side built into the system. There is no reason to leave the winning side built into the system. 'The Market!' and 'PvP!' where both put forth as equalizing factors by CCP and CSM. Almost a year is enough time to show that they aren't enough. Unless numbers equalize a bit the sov war will remain lop-sided. |

Snape Dieboldmotor
In Exile. Imperial Outlaws.
10
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 15:24:00 -
[36] - Quote
If you study the kill stats you see that fw is a success. I like some of the minor tweaks mentioned in this thread, but major changes are not necessary. Fw is not broken.
|

Zarnak Wulf
In Exile. Imperial Outlaws.
1183
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 15:31:00 -
[37] - Quote
Snape Dieboldmotor wrote:If you study the kill stats you see that fw is a success. I like some of the minor tweaks mentioned in this thread, but major changes are not necessary. Fw is not broken.
Does that mean you'll cover my shift so I can spend time with my family today?   |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
1344
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 17:03:00 -
[38] - Quote
After looking at both Fweddit and Moar Tears killboards, it's kind of lolworthy that any request is being made at all. Most of their kills are in Egglehende - a system which is not in FW space. You wonder if they would get any fights in FW if they actually, say, patrolled the FW area instead of camped the high sec gates in Eggh (and then called camping high sec gates "the right kind of pvp").
+1 to In Exile. who live in Eggh, but appear to actually go looking for fights in FW.
And +1 to Amarrian Retribution who actually have the balls to live in FW space. Right now Sahtogas is getting massive numbers of fights because these guys have chosen to defend it, (and some Minmatar have chosen to attack it). This is how FW Occupancy warfare is supposed to work.
|

Cosmo Raata
T-Cells Moar Tears
31
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 17:32:00 -
[39] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:After looking at both Fweddit and Moar Tears killboards, it's kind of lolworthy that any request is being made at all. Most of their kills are in Egglehende - a system which is not in FW space. You wonder if they would get any fights in FW if they actually, say, patrolled the FW area instead of camped the high sec gates in Eggh (and then called camping high sec gates "the right kind of pvp").
+1 to In Exile. who live in Eggh, but appear to actually go looking for fights in FW.
And +1 to Amarrian Retribution who actually have the balls to live in FW space. Right now Sahtogas is getting massive numbers of fights because these guys have chosen to defend it, (and some Minmatar have chosen to attack it). This is how FW Occupancy warfare is supposed to work.
You do know we all lived in FW space before but due to TZ issues we would struggle to keep even our own system right? Literally 3 people would come in and plex all night and we'd wake up to the tune of a 30% swing.
Wulf is right in the sense that TZ is a problem, but that can't be fixed!
What really needs to happen is to stop rewarding the individual through non-pvp risk. Reward the group that is willing to use teamwork.
I mean ffs people, its named FACTIONAL WARFARE!!!!!!!!
Faction implies 1 side (a group) against another.
Warfare implies fighting.
Yet the system revolves around who can farm beacons.
Why is Minnie a larger force? People want to take advantage of the LP & rewards.
Why is Amarr losing? We try to focus on fighting and not plexing.
The system is broken, and you can call it a major fix that needs to happen or minor tweaks, but it still isn't working or if this is what CCP wants, they need to rename it because it ain't FACTIONAL WARFARE.
Maybe that is what CCP needs, a new name. How about we use this thread to help CCP rename it instead of provide good ideas that they refuse to implement?
I vote we call it:
1) Beacon Bonanza!!!
2) The LP Store
3) Factional Hide & Seek
4) Mission Control
5) Plex & Cloak
6) DeScan Spam
7) Working as Intended
Feel free to help CCP rename their work of art. |

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
890
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 17:52:00 -
[40] - Quote
Snape Dieboldmotor wrote:If you study the kill stats you see that fw is a success. I like some of the minor tweaks mentioned in this thread, but major changes are not necessary. Fw is not broken.
"Faction war" and "faction war sov" are 2 different things. Faction war sov is broken. If you look at the killoards of top vp gainers for the day (that si those with the biggest impact on sov for that day) you will see they had very little if any pvp. You will see they mostly fly pve ships. That is because running from pvp is the most effective way to gain sov under the current mechanics.
@Zarnak Why do you only consider the 4 systems that amarr hold. Don't you ever dream of holding more than 4 ssytems? The defensive plexing rabbits are just as bad if not worse than the offensive plexing rabbits. Sure they are not getting as much lp (if any at all) but they are still effecting sov just as much.
Having players roaming around trying to find these rabbits so they don't completely control sov is obviously not working. We need better tools if we want it there the be some combat in this war. Alarms or notifications or at least a map that shows where our military complexes are currently under attack is necessary. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Rommell Drako
T-Cells Moar Tears
29
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 17:53:00 -
[41] - Quote
Please bear with me. Responding to multiple people and multiple posts
Milton Middleson wrote:Quote:everything is exploitable.
It's worse than that, since it actively punishes people for trying to attack or defend. Under such a scheme, it would be better to do nothing and dplex later than to engage at a disadvantage. Quote:This is a warzone, why does PVP not matter?
Best example is the Amarr Militia and Fweddit. Fweddit has a massive amount of kills and PVPs all the time. Yet the minmatar are (were) winning the warzone due to broken farming mechanics. Why should kills directly affect a war? Wars are won by accomplishing military objective; killing the enemy is just a means to that end. Conversely, it's entirely possible to waste your time doing nothing of consequence and inflicting irrelevant losses on the opposition (this is especially true in EVE, where dying is an inconvenience). There's nothing wrong with that, but it's pretty unreasonable to insist that it also directly affect the warzone.
"No one wins a war by dying for his country. You win war by making some other dumb bastard die for his." - Patton.
While yes wars are typically won by taking positions, resources, locations, etc. But removing the number of people from the location typically is how you win a fight. See kill enough of the others so they do not have enough to continue to kill you. This is what 00 is all about. WELCOME TO ALPHA FLEET NOOB! kill enough of them and their guns cant kill you. and once there is no one but you left well guess what you just won.
Have you ever played risk? how do you take over a location? by killing all the enemys guys on it? or orbiting it while the other player is asleep? Capture the flag has a higher risk and reward system then the current FW mechanics. If you are trying to take someones flag and a enemy shows up, you cant just leave and wait 4 hours and then go to capture the flag while the other player sleeps.
FLyinghotpocket: Yes people wil try to exploit. but the amount of LP given at the kill of anything is redic miniscule. For example:
MY MATH IS AIDS by the way. I just like to use simple examples.
I killed a rifter (minmatar) with a total killboard post worth of 10.6 mil isk. I recieved a total of 481 LP for that kill. Which means for every kill I get i receive 1 LP per every 22,038 isk blown up. Now if you would like to exploit a JF (at the tune of 7 bil i am using easy numbers, this would actually cost more) to push your control... Which would give you 317,633 LP be my guest. Which by the way would be at the edge of 1/3 of the system push required. So in order to capture 1 single system you would need to kill 3 JFs in this manner. If someone wants to do the math to see if killing a JF and getting those loyalty points is worth the cost to capture a single system please let me know. IF 952,899 LP is worth 21 bil isk... which at the LP market store you are cashing out great at 1,200 isk per LP... or 1,143,478,800 is the isk value of that 952,899 LP...
So please show me how killing 21 billion in JFs is worth the 1 billion you would receive from the LP gain or the single system flip.... |

Rommell Drako
T-Cells Moar Tears
29
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 17:56:00 -
[42] - Quote
Bad Messenger wrote:FW is working fine, CCP set goal they want to achieve and stats show that they managed to do good changes.
The fact that most players had different goal what changes should do does not matter, FW is fine, get over it.
maybe if we wait couple years stats will go down after hype and CCP has to do something, other option is that players start to play FW like CCP planned, i do not see reason why that should happen, but hey who am i to see future always.
FW is an isk faucet for risk averse cloak fit atrons. If working as intended then thats fine. But it is not a Faction Warfare anymore. Low sec Missioning and beacon orbiting maybe...
If this is what CCP wants then thats fine. Just change the name.
If CCP will say on this thread that it is working as intended... that afk plexers is what they want... then I would not be surpirsed when amarr stops running a single plex, only pvps, and publicly announces that every single amarr pilot has a minni mission running alt... |

Rommell Drako
T-Cells Moar Tears
29
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 18:03:00 -
[43] - Quote
Silence iKillYouu wrote:ccp have been working on FW alot. stop crying go camp highsec stations if its to hard for u to get kills.
Huola Station has spoken...
EVEN LNA should be able to agree that the kills you get in a system should work towards the warzone... wouldnt that better your pvp and actually make staying in 1 system worthwhile instead of blatant cowardice... ind4 never able to warp to any range but 100.. |

Plato Forko
Amarrian Vengeance
16
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 18:13:00 -
[44] - Quote
automatic timer rollback is such a dumb idea. how exactly does it help reduce PvE in FW to introduce a mechanic that has the same effect as actual players defending a plex? it's no wonder CCP can't figure out what to do when people are constantly spamming with weird ideas.
you know what i'm gonna say now: nerf wild LP bonuses for plexing, buff LP for blapping enemies. if everything else stays exactly the same at the very least the farming problem will be addressed. not just LP farming either, but killmail farming as well since everyone will want as few people as necessary on each killmail to individually gain the most LP from it. i'll shut up if someone can point out a downside to that |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
1344
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 18:18:00 -
[45] - Quote
Cosmo Raata wrote: Wulf is right in the sense that TZ is a problem, but that can't be fixed!
Adding to contested levels based on kills won't solve this issue, unless the rewards for doing so are boosted to levels that are exploitable. Edit: Not saying it's a bad idea, just that it won't help you "win" FW.
The system favors a those who can put together a group of players to provide full TZ coverage. If you can do that, then the systems you target will not be won by others who run plexes during your off time (farmers or others interested in occupancy over fights). Now you know how to contest systems in the occupancy war - at least in a area near where you are going to base out of. Have at it. |

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
890
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 18:19:00 -
[46] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:After looking at both Fweddit and Moar Tears killboards, it's kind of lolworthy that any request is being made at all. Most of their kills are in Egglehende - a system which is not in FW space. You wonder if they would get any fights in FW if they actually, say, patrolled the FW area instead of camping the high sec gates in Eggh (and then called camping high sec gates "the right kind of pvp").
+1 to In Exile. who live in Eggh, but appear to actually go looking for fights in FW.
And +1 to Amarrian Retribution who actually have the balls to live in FW space. Right now Sahtogas is getting massive numbers of fights because these guys have chosen to defend it, (and some Minmatar have chosen to attack it). This is how FW Occupancy warfare is supposed to work.
Unlike your corp where you require people to orbit a plex everyday lots of people view eve as a game. They joined a war against a huge number of other players so that they can pvp. Not so they can have alts dplex a home system in atrons and run from anyone who comes to fight.
Givent the broken mechanics of fw living in a low sec non fw ssytem like egg makes sense if you are pvper. If Minmatar/gallente had more pvpers they would move in to egg too. But they want to stay safe where the enemy can't even dock ships. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Rommell Drako
T-Cells Moar Tears
30
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 18:35:00 -
[47] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Cosmo Raata wrote: Wulf is right in the sense that TZ is a problem, but that can't be fixed!
Adding to contested levels based on kills won't solve this issue, unless the rewards for doing so are boosted to levels that are exploitable. Edit: Not saying it's a bad idea, just that it won't help you "win" FW. The system favors a those who can put together a group of players to provide full TZ coverage. If you can do that, then the systems you target will not be won by others who run plexes during your off time (farmers or others interested in occupancy over fights). Now you know how to contest systems in the occupancy war - at least in a area near where you are going to base out of. Have at it.
I actually laughed at your forum warrioring... You dont understand the mechanics at all.
If we wanted to stay up into all the tzs then we would win pretty easily. the problem is we actually have jobs and RL.
So unfortunatly each TZ puts in around 5-8 hours if they want to actually dedicate to the cause. this means that any side with more TZ plexers, IE more EU and RUS vs the US then they win. no matter what. off of simple math and time.
Now do they actually have more numbers? or do they just farm better during those hours?
My point is that you dont actually have to fight to win FW. just plex with the other side is asleep in systems that they are not in. Done. Game over. Sounds good. |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
1344
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 18:49:00 -
[48] - Quote
Rommell Drako wrote:My point is that you dont actually have to fight to win FW. just plex with the other side is asleep in systems that they are not in. Done. Game over. Sounds good. You know how to solve that right? Recruit more off-TZ players to your cause. If there are none to be found, then I guess you're SOL.
There really is no other solution to the TZ coverage issue.
|

Garr Earthbender
Justified Chaos
150
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 19:02:00 -
[49] - Quote
My god, this whole post is full of troll/misunderstanding.
Cearain wrote:
Unlike your corp where you require people to orbit a plex everyday lots of people view eve as a game. They joined a war against a huge number of other players so that they can pvp. Not so they can have alts dplex a home system in atrons and run from anyone who comes to fight.
We're not required to plex, we do so cause it brings FIGHTS. We also have 'operational priorities' where we're encouraged to fight for a system or 2. It just so happens that we find fights. Lots of em actually. D plex alts are a part of FW whether you like it or not, and of COURSE they're gonna run. Why should a 0 tank 0 dps ship stay around?
Quote:Given the broken mechanics of fw living in a low sec non fw system like egg makes sense if you are pvper. If Minmatar/gallente had more pvpers they would move in to egg too. But they want to stay safe where the enemy can't even dock ships.
If I am defending a system I want an advantage. Having a station in that system that the enemy cannot dock in is an advantage. Hell, it's worse out in 0.0 where NOBODY can dock in the station except for the owning corp and renters. If the other side wants to be able to reship in enemy territory, that's what POSs are for. -Rock is overpowered, Scissors is fine. -Paper |

Juan Rayo
Justified Chaos
76
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 19:12:00 -
[50] - Quote
Cearain I wish you-¦d stop shitting on threads with your attacks on people who disagree with you because
1- Your notification idea is stupid. 2. We ACTUALLY PLAY in FW.
Now, you like numbers right? even if they don-¦t agree with you? go check Gallente Militia killboard and tell us again how JUSTK is "required to orbit buttons" all day and how we don-¦t pvp.
I should just stop feeding the troll really.
As for the issues discussed in this thread:
1. We used to have problems with 3 or 4 people coming into our system in a different timezone and plexing it up. Instead of crying to CCP about it we got a. Friends in diff timezones and b. recruited players in different timezones. Problem over.
2. This thread if nothing else proves that the stupid "notification" idea is not needed/would not work. If amarr can-¦t find "rabbits" plexing the FOUR systems they hold atm, no amount of notification spamm is gonna change that.
3. Kills affecting system contested status would be a ***** to program (I think) and would have no counterpart in all of Eve. There are other, simpler fixes proposed that a lot of people seem to agree upon: timer rollback. Hell even LP corp tax. Altho if you think FW is being farmed now imagine if we had corp LP tax... |

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
890
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 19:33:00 -
[51] - Quote
Garr Earthbender wrote:My god, this whole post is full of troll/misunderstanding. Cearain wrote:
Unlike your corp where you require people to orbit a plex everyday lots of people view eve as a game. They joined a war against a huge number of other players so that they can pvp. Not so they can have alts dplex a home system in atrons and run from anyone who comes to fight.
We're not required to plex, we do so cause it brings FIGHTS. We also have 'operational priorities' where we're encouraged to fight for a system or 2. It just so happens that we find fights. Lots of em actually.
It must have been some other gallente corp that had the required plexing.
Garr Earthbender wrote: D plex alts are a part of FW whether you like it or not, and of COURSE they're gonna run. Why should a 0 tank 0 dps ship stay around?.
Indeed this is were we disagree. I don't think the war should be won by people who have 0 tank and 0 dps and just run from every wartarget.
Obviously I don't like it that rabbits win the war. That is why I have been advocating a pvp based sov war mechanic. I understand that you and other in jk are very happy with fw sov being rabbit based. At least we identified the root of the disagreement.
Garr Earthbender wrote:Quote:Given the broken mechanics of fw living in a low sec non fw system like egg makes sense if you are pvper. If Minmatar/gallente had more pvpers they would move in to egg too. But they want to stay safe where the enemy can't even dock ships. If I am defending a system I want an advantage. Having a station in that system that the enemy cannot dock in is an advantage. Hell, it's worse out in 0.0 where NOBODY can dock in the station except for the owning corp and renters. If the other side wants to be able to reship in enemy territory, that's what POSs are for.
If you want pvp go to where both sides can have ships. If you want to win a silly carebear race where you have alts fly ships with no tank or dps so you can win, then carry on.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Milton Middleson
Rifterlings Point Blank Alliance
266
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 19:41:00 -
[52] - Quote
Rommell Drako wrote:
While yes wars are typically won by taking positions, resources, locations, etc. But removing the number of people from the location typically is how you win a fight. See kill enough of the others so they do not have enough to continue to kill you. This is what 00 is all about. WELCOME TO ALPHA FLEET NOOB! kill enough of them and their guns cant kill you. and once there is no one but you left well guess what you just won.
Have you ever played risk? how do you take over a location? by killing all the enemys guys on it? or orbiting it while the other player is asleep? Capture the flag has a higher risk and reward system then the current FW mechanics. If you are trying to take someones flag and a enemy shows up, you cant just leave and wait 4 hours and then go to capture the flag while the other player sleeps.
Your comparisons are silly. First of all, Risk is an entirely different game with an entirely different set of mechanics, so comparison is absurd. Second, Risk has an incredibly simplistic combat simulation that comes down to luck and attrition. I can't take territory in risk by outmaneuvering my opponent. CTF is slightly better, I suppose, but here's the thing: you totally can leave and come back and try later, and people do. It's just the limited temporal scope that prevents people from waiting until you're asleep. If we were playing a week-long game of CTF with no breaks, sneaking in while everyone was asleep to nick the flag would be a pretty solid strategy.
And your proposal isn't like either of those. It's demanding a direct reward for killing the enemy. The tactical reward for killing the enemy is that they aren't around to oppose you while you take your objective. If you're not capitalizing on killing the enemy, or you're just not getting kills doing something relevant, that's your failure.
I don't know if you've really grasped this yet, but the problem you're attacking is insoluble so long as EVE players don't all play in the same timezone. And believe it or not, it extends to other things besides FW. |

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
890
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 20:03:00 -
[53] - Quote
Juan Rayo wrote:Cearain I wish you-¦d stop shitting on threads with your attacks on people who disagree with you because
1- Your notification idea is stupid. 2. We ACTUALLY PLAY in FW.
Now, you like numbers right? even if they don-¦t agree with you? go check Gallente Militia killboard and tell us again how JUSTK is "required to orbit buttons" all day and how we don-¦t pvp..
I have already seen it. Now you go look at the top five vp gainers for the day and tell me what their killboard looks like. They are the ones who are having the largest impact on fw sov. Or is it you who refuses to look at the data?
Notifications are a horrible idea if you want to win the war with rabbits that constantly run from pvp. I see yoru militia is doing quite well under the current hide and seek plexing mechanics so i am not surprised you don't like the idea. (its not even my idea anyway)
Juan Rayo wrote: I should just stop feeding the troll really.
As for the issues discussed in this thread:
1. We used to have problems with 3 or 4 people coming into our system in a different timezone and plexing it up. Instead of crying to CCP about it we got a. Friends in diff timezones and b. recruited players in different timezones. Problem over.
2. This thread if nothing else proves that the stupid "notification" idea is not needed/would not work. If amarr can-¦t find "rabbits" plexing the FOUR systems they hold atm, no amount of notification spamm is gonna change that..
The warzone is actually 70 systems. Not 4. You again demonstrate how afraid you are that the enemy will know where all your rabbits are plexing and so they might actually have to fight a war instead of carebear it.
Juan Rayo wrote: 3. Kills affecting system contested status would be a ***** to program (I think) and would have no counterpart in all of Eve. There are other, simpler fixes proposed that a lot of people seem to agree upon: timer rollback. Hell even LP corp tax. Altho if you think FW is being farmed now imagine if we had corp LP tax...
Edit: missed something that XG mentioned and I-¦d like to repeat: look at the Amarr in Sahtogas. They are fighting for their system, getting lots of action and (one would think) fun. Imagine if more Amarr alliances/corps dared moved to lowsec and help each other out. FW pvp AND sov right there.
Sahtogas is heating up recently but it traditionally isn't even one of the top pvp systems on that front. Usuually its just lots of boring dplexing. You and your corp may be fine with that, (and cry bloody murder anytime someone suggests changes that would make the war pvp) but others want to actually fight a war. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Juan Rayo
Justified Chaos
77
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 20:33:00 -
[54] - Quote
Cearain wrote: but others want to actually fight a war.
When you say "others" you understand you are talking about US right? the ones actually fighting and actually IN fw? |

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
890
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 21:13:00 -
[55] - Quote
Juan Rayo wrote:Cearain wrote: but others want to actually fight a war. When you say "others" you understand you are talking about US right? the ones actually fighting and actually IN fw?
No not you. You are the ones who want to make sure your rabbits can hide and avoid all pvp as they win sov. You are the ones who continually argue that rabbit plexing is fine, and always cry out when anyone suggests changes that would end it.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Tsobai Hashimoto
Mayhem and Ruin
138
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 21:43:00 -
[56] - Quote
Rommell Drako wrote:Bad Messenger wrote:FW is working fine, CCP set goal they want to achieve and stats show that they managed to do good changes.
The fact that most players had different goal what changes should do does not matter, FW is fine, get over it.
maybe if we wait couple years stats will go down after hype and CCP has to do something, other option is that players start to play FW like CCP planned, i do not see reason why that should happen, but hey who am i to see future always. FW is an isk faucet for risk averse cloak fit atrons. If working as intended then thats fine. But it is not a Faction Warfare anymore. Low sec Missioning and beacon orbiting maybe... If this is what CCP wants then thats fine. Just change the name. If CCP will say on this thread that it is working as intended... that afk plexers is what they want... then I would not be surpirsed when amarr stops running a single plex, only pvps, and publicly announces that every single amarr pilot has a minni mission running alt...
that is exactly what im thinking about doing
how much would two pilots cost me at the bazzar that can fly sb?
wouldnt even need extra accounts to pay for plex. transfer one to my main one on my alt and bam....run minnie missions once or twice a week. make a bill a week and get **** killed
**** thats a great idea lol
|

chatgris
Quantum Cats Syndicate Samurai Pizza Cats
470
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 21:46:00 -
[57] - Quote
Cearain wrote:Juan Rayo wrote:Cearain wrote: but others want to actually fight a war. When you say "others" you understand you are talking about US right? the ones actually fighting and actually IN fw? No not you. You are the ones who want to make sure your rabbits can hide and avoid all pvp as they win sov. You are the ones who continually argue that rabbit plexing is fine, and always cry out when anyone suggests changes that would end it.
We made a channel for you to tell you where our stabbed deplexing alts were, and I don't think you ever even joined. I was broadcasting over and over "Merlin in _____ plex in Notoras" with my alt. |

ALUCARD 1208
Spiritus Draconis Sicarius Draconis
172
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 22:42:00 -
[58] - Quote
Rommell Drako wrote:
If we wanted to stay up into all the tzs then we would win pretty easily. the problem is we actually have jobs and RL.
So unfortunatly each TZ puts in around 5-8 hours if they want to actually dedicate to the cause. this means that any side with more TZ plexers, IE more EU and RUS vs the US then they win. no matter what. off of simple math and time.
I had to laugh at this.
Right ofc if you want to win u have to have coverage of TZs  or should we ask ccp chatgris just to spawn plexes wenever your online so u can work till your hearts content and noone have a chance to undo the plexing youve done? 
or we could ask ccp for a pause button so the whole of eve stops wen u guys arnt logged on GÖÑ HIGH FIVES GÖÑ-á |

Klazktrknuitzksalikamono
Hedion University Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 23:03:00 -
[59] - Quote
HI HELLO THIS IS PINKY AMARR FW FLAGSHIP
PICTUR
YEA DATS WHAT WE TALKIN' ABOUT |

Mr Dynamic
University of Caille Gallente Federation
6
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 23:11:00 -
[60] - Quote
Klazktrknuitzksalikamono wrote:
SMUG SMUG SMUG SMUG
NOMAD PLS NOMAD PLS NOMAD PLS NOMAD PLS NOMAD PLS NOMAD PLS NOMAD PLS NOMAD PLS NOMAD PLS NOMAD PLS every other bid in this thread is an alt of mine, pick the cheapest one and I'll pay that much.-á |

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
890
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 23:23:00 -
[61] - Quote
chatgris wrote:Cearain wrote:Juan Rayo wrote:Cearain wrote: but others want to actually fight a war. When you say "others" you understand you are talking about US right? the ones actually fighting and actually IN fw? No not you. You are the ones who want to make sure your rabbits can hide and avoid all pvp as they win sov. You are the ones who continually argue that rabbit plexing is fine, and always cry out when anyone suggests changes that would end it. We made a channel for you to tell you where our stabbed deplexing alts were, and I don't think you ever even joined. I was broadcasting over and over "Merlin in _____ plex in Notoras" with my alt.
Sorry to see someone who used to be an advocate of a pvp centered fw sov is now so afraid that gallente rabbits will be systematically removed from the game. You even participated in this farce of an info channel.
I think the op should be able to see the problem. CCP made faction war a pve game and so now there are allot of carebears who like it that way. Even chatgris is afraid what will happen to gallente if the plexing rabbits cant hide anymore. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

ALUCARD 1208
Spiritus Draconis Sicarius Draconis
172
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 23:26:00 -
[62] - Quote
yawn another thread for cearain to sperg about that damn notification .... IM OUT GÖÑ HIGH FIVES GÖÑ-á |

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
890
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 23:31:00 -
[63] - Quote
ALUCARD 1208 wrote:yawn another thread for cearain to sperg about that damn notification .... IM OUT
Another thread that points out fw is still a broken carebear race. So yes another thread with the solution. Why do you think we keep getting these threads? Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Eidellia
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 23:32:00 -
[64] - Quote
Klazktrknuitzksalikamono wrote:
That's pretty funny. |

Xolve
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
1367
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 23:38:00 -
[65] - Quote
Klazktrknuitzksalikamono wrote:
 Inappropriate signature removed. Navigator. |

Rommell Drako
T-Cells Moar Tears
30
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 00:31:00 -
[66] - Quote
Tsobai Hashimoto wrote:Rommell Drako wrote:Bad Messenger wrote:FW is working fine, CCP set goal they want to achieve and stats show that they managed to do good changes.
The fact that most players had different goal what changes should do does not matter, FW is fine, get over it.
maybe if we wait couple years stats will go down after hype and CCP has to do something, other option is that players start to play FW like CCP planned, i do not see reason why that should happen, but hey who am i to see future always. FW is an isk faucet for risk averse cloak fit atrons. If working as intended then thats fine. But it is not a Faction Warfare anymore. Low sec Missioning and beacon orbiting maybe... If this is what CCP wants then thats fine. Just change the name. If CCP will say on this thread that it is working as intended... that afk plexers is what they want... then I would not be surpirsed when amarr stops running a single plex, only pvps, and publicly announces that every single amarr pilot has a minni mission running alt... that is exactly what im thinking about doing how much would two pilots cost me at the bazzar that can fly sb? wouldnt even need extra accounts to pay for plex. transfer one to my main one on my alt and bam....run minnie missions once or twice a week. make a bill a week and get **** killed **** thats a great idea lol
I actually do this already. Honestly all you need is a meta 4 torp launcher and t2 fit purifier. Character bazaar can probably pull for like 1-2bil. Its super easy and you can actually make around 1 bil per 6 hours. notice how i PVE on my minni alt and pvp on my amarr main. Because that shows the system is working as intended.
|

Cosmo Raata
T-Cells Moar Tears
33
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 00:32:00 -
[67] - Quote
Klazktrknuitzksalikamono wrote:
Wait, I thought we were arguing that Factional Warfare is broken, not that Amarr is losing.
Who cares, as it currently goes who wouldn't do that?
Hell, its evidence that PvP & Plexing don't currently mix at all. Separate activities.
Oh, and to all those who enjoy the status quo and post on here to simply try to put out the flames.....I take it you're raking in the LP nicely and you'd like nothing more than to keep everything as is. Go ahead, keep bumping the thread, no one takes your opinion with any weight at all. We all know its broken, now its just a matter of calling out CCP for what they are, pussies unwilling to risk subscriptions. |

Terhiss
Moira. Villore Accords
25
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 00:34:00 -
[68] - Quote
Here's my take on FW.
"the war is won...". But did you stop and consider that maybe "the war" is not won by conquering systems? I might even go as far as asking, what exactly is "winning the war within the current Fw mechanics?"
Here's how things are right now in Fw as of Sovereignity and Lp rewards:
--If you conquer/upgrade more systems, you have primarily more Lp rewarded from offensive plexing and missions, plus other less influencial bonuses (faster production, less taxes, less repair costs at stations) L---> But: since upgrading systems now is a lot more costly Lp-wise (300.000 Lp +increasing taxes up to 70%), and you would end up with a less fertile plexing ground, there is no real incentive on winning the war. Probably what would happen in a 90-10 map, is the dominating side turning to missions, as the minority continuing offensive plexing on the numerous available systems, the result? probably back to initial state of balance.
Since the new mechanic grants up to +225% Lp reward for offensive plex at T5, the question is, where would you offensive plex at T5? Since no one seems incredibly motivated by going above Tier 2, things will probably remain stagnant sov-wise.
My take, is that a red-blue balance of the map is silently accepted by both flags. Meaning continuing to have farming ground to fund our pvp. Which has seen increasing numbers as never before. And that to me is a war that's been won by ccp. By us.
There is no war to be won. Just a game that fuels its own end: keep doing what you love.
|

Xolve
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
1367
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 00:35:00 -
[69] - Quote
Cosmo Raata wrote:Oh, and to all those who enjoy the status quo and post on here to simply try to put out the flames.....I take it you're raking in the LP nicely and you'd like nothing more than to keep everything as is. Go ahead, keep bumping the thread, no one takes your opinion with any weight at all. We all know its broken, now its just a matter of calling out CCP for what they are, pussies unwilling to risk subscriptions.
Please tell us more about this game you don't play... Inappropriate signature removed. Navigator. |

Rommell Drako
T-Cells Moar Tears
30
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 00:42:00 -
[70] - Quote
In regards to pinkys cloak frig.
We at FWEDDIT and YOLOCOLO are currently particitpating in a No Metal RUNMATAR campaign. Where we are using kills of their cloaky ships and doing exaclty what the minmatar have been doing. AFK cloak plexing.
We started Thursday and are continuing until the end of this week.
So yes you will see stabbed and cloak pve frigs for the next few days.
WE are using this to make a point that you dont actually have to pvp to win the warzone. So far Fweddit has some pretty iconic numbers in regards to VP.
I think we did 49.4% of all amarr VP yesterday. and many systems are now over 50% contested that were orignially stable. We have flipped 2 systems already and plan to flip a large number by the end of the week.
The game logs and fraps will show that amarr is able to push back and actually gain warzone control if we stop having fun and turn into drones that plex all day |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
1347
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 00:45:00 -
[71] - Quote
Cosmo Raata wrote:Hell, its evidence that PvP & Plexing don't currently mix at all. Separate activities.
Really? I plex and get pvp all the time. And even Cearain uses plexes to get pvp. You might want to rephrase your statement. |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
1348
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 00:46:00 -
[72] - Quote
Rommell Drako wrote: I think we did 49.4% of all amarr VP yesterday. and many systems are now over 50% contested that were orignially stable. We have flipped 2 systems already and plan to flip a large number by the end of the week.
The game logs and fraps will show that amarr is able to push back and actually gain warzone control if we stop having fun and turn into drones that plex all day
Great point. Now go attack Huola or a system the Minmatar care about.
|

Eidellia
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 00:49:00 -
[73] - Quote
Rommell Drako wrote:In regards to pinkys cloak frig.
We at FWEDDIT and YOLOCOLO are currently particitpating in a No Metal RUNMATAR campaign. Where we are using kills of their cloaky ships and doing exaclty what the minmatar have been doing. AFK cloak plexing.
We started Thursday and are continuing until the end of this week.
So yes you will see stabbed and cloak pve frigs for the next few days.
WE are using this to make a point that you dont actually have to pvp to win the warzone. So far Fweddit has some pretty iconic numbers in regards to VP.
I think we did 49.4% of all amarr VP yesterday. and many systems are now over 50% contested that were orignially stable. We have flipped 2 systems already and plan to flip a large number by the end of the week.
The game logs and fraps will show that amarr is able to push back and actually gain warzone control if we stop having fun and turn into drones that plex all day
Why is the system right next to your staging system still at 0.07% contested then? If you're doing a massive plexing push. Surely you could throw thrashers & cloaky tristans at that all day and easily reship?
|

Rommell Drako
T-Cells Moar Tears
30
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 00:54:00 -
[74] - Quote
Terhiss wrote:Here's my take on FW.
"the war is won...". But did you stop and consider that maybe "the war" is not won by conquering systems? I might even go as far as asking, what exactly is "winning the war within the current Fw mechanics?"
Here's how things are right now in Fw as of Sovereignity and Lp rewards:
--If you conquer/upgrade more systems, you have primarily more Lp rewarded from offensive plexing and missions, plus other less influencial bonuses (faster production, less taxes, less repair costs at stations) L---> But: since upgrading systems now is a lot more costly Lp-wise (300.000 Lp +increasing taxes up to 70%), and you would end up with a less fertile plexing ground, there is no real incentive on winning the war. Probably what would happen in a 90-10 map, is the dominating side turning to missions, as the minority continuing offensive plexing on the numerous available systems, the result? probably back to initial state of balance.
Since the new mechanic grants up to +225% Lp reward for offensive plex at T5, the question is, where would you offensive plex at T5? Since no one seems incredibly motivated by going above Tier 2, things will probably remain stagnant sov-wise.
My take, is that a red-blue balance of the map is silently accepted by both flags. Meaning continuing to have farming ground to fund our pvp. Which has seen increasing numbers as never before. And that to me is a war that's been won by ccp. By us.
There is no war to be won. Just a game that fuels its own end: keep doing what you love.
That +225% LP gain is used in missions. which lvl 4 FW missions is where the isk is.
Thanks for proving that you have no idea what you are talking about, because you are either bad or have never played FW. |

Cosmo Raata
T-Cells Moar Tears
34
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 00:56:00 -
[75] - Quote
Xolve wrote:Cosmo Raata wrote:Oh, and to all those who enjoy the status quo and post on here to simply try to put out the flames.....I take it you're raking in the LP nicely and you'd like nothing more than to keep everything as is. Go ahead, keep bumping the thread, no one takes your opinion with any weight at all. We all know its broken, now its just a matter of calling out CCP for what they are, pussies unwilling to risk subscriptions. Please tell us more about this game you don't play...
Please comment more about how EPA was factional warfare. |

Cosmo Raata
T-Cells Moar Tears
34
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 00:59:00 -
[76] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Cosmo Raata wrote:Hell, its evidence that PvP & Plexing don't currently mix at all. Separate activities.
Really? I plex and get pvp all the time. And even Cearain uses plexes to get pvp. You might want to rephrase your statement.
And since it works for you that must mean its awesome. Congrats.
Atron ftw. |

Rommell Drako
T-Cells Moar Tears
31
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 01:01:00 -
[77] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Rommell Drako wrote: I think we did 49.4% of all amarr VP yesterday. and many systems are now over 50% contested that were orignially stable. We have flipped 2 systems already and plan to flip a large number by the end of the week.
The game logs and fraps will show that amarr is able to push back and actually gain warzone control if we stop having fun and turn into drones that plex all day
Great point. Now go attack Huola or a system the Minmatar care about.
The minmatar care about every system. Which is why they use their farmers to push the warzone so much.
When we want fights we go to Huola, and LNA docks or only uses sniping nados and warps off.
We RF minni poses while they are cowering in them.
We kill their booster poses because they forgot how to stront.
Its really quite sad how pathetic the "war"zone is in regards to actual fights. the only times i have seen minmatar engage with out running away at first sight of orange on overview is when they are inside a plex before us with kiting condors and blackbirds. Or all in throwaway frigs and even then they typically burn away or warp in at minmatar range (see 100km at all times. even in armor brawling ships).
Also if the minmatar only cared about the few systems (such as huola that you mentioned) then why do they have control of all the other ones? oh yea. they farmed the plexs and flipped them. welcome to the warzone. |

Cosmo Raata
T-Cells Moar Tears
34
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 01:02:00 -
[78] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Rommell Drako wrote: I think we did 49.4% of all amarr VP yesterday. and many systems are now over 50% contested that were orignially stable. We have flipped 2 systems already and plan to flip a large number by the end of the week.
The game logs and fraps will show that amarr is able to push back and actually gain warzone control if we stop having fun and turn into drones that plex all day
Great point. Now go attack Huola or a system the Minmatar care about.
Attack, as in spend countless hours flying around beacons while trying to coax minmatar to come out and fight, then leave when RL requires sleep to come back to a system that is exactly the same because Russian TZ reversed it.
No Thanks. If it meant we got fights, sure, but it doesn't force sh*t. |

Rommell Drako
T-Cells Moar Tears
31
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 01:02:00 -
[79] - Quote
Eidellia wrote:Rommell Drako wrote:In regards to pinkys cloak frig.
We at FWEDDIT and YOLOCOLO are currently particitpating in a No Metal RUNMATAR campaign. Where we are using kills of their cloaky ships and doing exaclty what the minmatar have been doing. AFK cloak plexing.
We started Thursday and are continuing until the end of this week.
So yes you will see stabbed and cloak pve frigs for the next few days.
WE are using this to make a point that you dont actually have to pvp to win the warzone. So far Fweddit has some pretty iconic numbers in regards to VP.
I think we did 49.4% of all amarr VP yesterday. and many systems are now over 50% contested that were orignially stable. We have flipped 2 systems already and plan to flip a large number by the end of the week.
The game logs and fraps will show that amarr is able to push back and actually gain warzone control if we stop having fun and turn into drones that plex all day Why is the system right next to your staging system still at 0.07% contested then? If you're doing a massive plexing push. Surely you could throw thrashers & cloaky tristans at that all day and easily reship?
What better way to find systems that the minmatar are not massed in then to go away from the typically fighting area...
For example, do you run to where everyone is or do you go to where there is no one? |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
1349
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 01:09:00 -
[80] - Quote
Cosmo Raata wrote:And since it works for you that must mean its awesome. Congrats. Atron ftw. No, it just means it works. If a moron like me can get a mechanic to work, I'm sure brain surgeons in MOAR TEARS and Fweddit can.
|

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
898
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 01:10:00 -
[81] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Cosmo Raata wrote:Hell, its evidence that PvP & Plexing don't currently mix at all. Separate activities.
Really? I plex and get pvp all the time. And even Cearain uses plexes to get pvp. You might want to rephrase your statement.
There is plexing for sov and plexing for fights. I do the latter.
If i wanted to plex to actually win the sov war I would get a cloak and a stabbed ship and avoid all pvp. Just like i see so many gallente doing as I travel through your warzone. You and your rabbit plexers are doing it right under the current mechanics, but the current mechanics are horrible.
Thats why we keep getting new threads at the top of warfare and tactics talking about how broken the sov game is. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Rommell Drako
T-Cells Moar Tears
42
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 01:13:00 -
[82] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Cosmo Raata wrote:And since it works for you that must mean its awesome. Congrats. Atron ftw. No, it just means it works. If a moron like me can get a mechanic to work, I'm sure brain surgeons in MOAR TEARS and Fweddit can.
We do understand how to do it. We have done what you are doing. What we are saying is that its stupid and we realize that its wrong and are asking for change. |

Cosmo Raata
T-Cells Moar Tears
45
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 01:13:00 -
[83] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Cosmo Raata wrote:And since it works for you that must mean its awesome. Congrats. Atron ftw. No, it just means it works. If a moron like me can get a mechanic to work, I'm sure brain surgeons in MOAR TEARS and Fweddit can.
Difference isn't brain power, its that people like you defend the status quo because you're comfortable with sub par and average, while others speak the truth in face of criticism because they want something better and worth their time/effort. |

Terhiss
Moira. Villore Accords
27
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 01:13:00 -
[84] - Quote
Rommell Drako wrote:That +225% LP gain is used in missions. which lvl 4 FW missions is where the isk is.
Yup, I misswrote that regarding the offensive plex Lp increase. It only regards missions. The reason why I wrote that mistakenly is that i havent plexed since last October, the last Gallente big lp-dump to Tier 5, so this proves you how much of a plexer I am.
Which doesnt change a thing to my opinion. There is no current incentive of flipping systems to a complete blue map. So tell me, what is the incentive of gaining map dominance? |

Rommell Drako
T-Cells Moar Tears
44
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 01:18:00 -
[85] - Quote
Terhiss wrote:Rommell Drako wrote:That +225% LP gain is used in missions. which lvl 4 FW missions is where the isk is. Yup, I misswrote that regarding the offensive plex Lp increase. It only regards missions. The reason why I wrote that mistakenly is that i havent plexed since last October, the last Gallente big lp-dump to Tier 5, so this proves you how much of a plexer I am. Which doesnt change a thing to my opinion. There is no current incentive of flipping systems to a complete blue map. So tell me, what is the incentive of gaining map dominance?
The incentive is if you own t5, then you get the +225% bonus to mission Lp. Which is like 100k LP per missions. Which you can then use to abuse the LP store. So there is your reason to be in t5 and own all the systems. Only the war zone farmers plex and they only do it so they can keep that tier 5 or 4 of the warzone so their SB alts can make bank.
Once again, proving that you dont know what your talking about. If you cant understand how amazing +225% LP gain per LVL 4 mission which are ******** easy to run as minmatar becuase lasers cant track for **** from amarr rats then you sire should probably re-evaluate your knowledge on the FW mechanics.
|

Terhiss
Moira. Villore Accords
29
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 01:36:00 -
[86] - Quote
Rommell Drako wrote: The incentive is if you own t5, then you get the +225% bonus to mission Lp. Which is like 100k LP per missions. Which you can then use to abuse the LP store. So there is your reason to be in t5 and own all the systems. Only the war zone farmers plex and they only do it so they can keep that tier 5 or 4 of the warzone so their SB alts can make bank.
Once again, proving that you dont know what your talking about. If you cant understand how amazing +225% LP gain per LVL 4 mission which are ******** easy to run as minmatar becuase lasers cant track for **** from amarr rats then you sire should probably re-evaluate your knowledge on the FW mechanics.
What I understand is that Gall/Caldari and Amar/Minm Fw space are very different. I should have defined that I was speaking of my home space, gallente warzone, where T2 is resilient since many weeks. You're right 225% mission Lp sounds amazing, but as it seems, no one appears to care about it in Gall/Cald space. Apparently everyone turns to Minmatar zone to run missions, thus creating this unbalance between warzones.
You're right, I have little knowledge of minmatar warzone, I can only tell you that if you're looking for honorable combat, you should come reside in Placid/Black rise, where you wont have to wait more than 5 minutes to be engaged, and thus forget your pains and misery, and all this sufering of yours will seem far away in our beloved homespace. Change sides. Gall/Cald to die with honor, Min/amar for the pocket money. There, your problem is solved. Now get off the forums, leave your corporation and join Moira. |

Cosmo Raata
T-Cells Moar Tears
47
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 01:43:00 -
[87] - Quote
Terhiss wrote:Rommell Drako wrote: The incentive is if you own t5, then you get the +225% bonus to mission Lp. Which is like 100k LP per missions. Which you can then use to abuse the LP store. So there is your reason to be in t5 and own all the systems. Only the war zone farmers plex and they only do it so they can keep that tier 5 or 4 of the warzone so their SB alts can make bank.
Once again, proving that you dont know what your talking about. If you cant understand how amazing +225% LP gain per LVL 4 mission which are ******** easy to run as minmatar becuase lasers cant track for **** from amarr rats then you sire should probably re-evaluate your knowledge on the FW mechanics.
What I understand is that Gall/Caldari and Amar/Minm Fw space are very different. I should have defined that I was speaking of my home space, gallente warzone, where T2 is resilient since many weeks. You're right 225% mission Lp sounds amazing, but as it seems, no one appears to care about it in Gall/Cald space. Apparently everyone turns to Minmatar zone to run missions, thus creating this unbalance between warzones. You're right, I have little knowledge of minmatar warzone, I can only tell you that if you're looking for honorable combat, you should come reside in Placid/Black rise, where you wont have to wait more than 5 minutes to be engaged, and thus forget your pains and misery, and all this sufering of yours will seem far away in our beloved homespace. Change sides. Gall/Cald to die with honor, Min/amar for the pocket money. There, your problem is solved. Now get off the forums, leave your corporation and join Moira.
LOL |

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
898
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 01:57:00 -
[88] - Quote
Terhiss wrote:Rommell Drako wrote: The incentive is if you own t5, then you get the +225% bonus to mission Lp. Which is like 100k LP per missions. Which you can then use to abuse the LP store. So there is your reason to be in t5 and own all the systems. Only the war zone farmers plex and they only do it so they can keep that tier 5 or 4 of the warzone so their SB alts can make bank.
Once again, proving that you dont know what your talking about. If you cant understand how amazing +225% LP gain per LVL 4 mission which are ******** easy to run as minmatar becuase lasers cant track for **** from amarr rats then you sire should probably re-evaluate your knowledge on the FW mechanics.
What I understand is that Gall/Caldari and Amar/Minm Fw space are very different. I should have defined that I was speaking of my home space, gallente warzone, where T2 is resilient since many weeks. You're right 225% mission Lp sounds amazing, but as it seems, no one appears to care about it in Gall/Cald space. Apparently everyone turns to Minmatar zone to run missions, thus creating this unbalance between warzones. You're right, I have little knowledge of minmatar warzone, I can only tell you that if you're looking for honorable combat, you should come reside in Placid/Black rise, where you wont have to wait more than 5 minutes to be engaged, and thus forget your pains and misery, and all this sufering of yours will seem far away in our beloved homespace. Change sides. Gall/Cald to die with honor, Min/amar for the pocket money. There, your problem is solved. Now get off the forums, leave your corporation and join Moira.
The gallente are just as bad as minmatar for rabbit plexing. In general the 2 fronts are about the same for "honorable combat." Gallente does a bit more gatecamping than the minmatar or amarr but thats about it.
Everyone pretty much acknowledged that runnign rabbit alts in pve ships is the way to win/hold over 90% of the space in the current mechanics. Can we not even agree that ccp should do something to make the game better?
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
577
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 02:01:00 -
[89] - Quote
Cearain wrote:Terhiss wrote:Rommell Drako wrote: The incentive is if you own t5, then you get the +225% bonus to mission Lp. Which is like 100k LP per missions. Which you can then use to abuse the LP store. So there is your reason to be in t5 and own all the systems. Only the war zone farmers plex and they only do it so they can keep that tier 5 or 4 of the warzone so their SB alts can make bank.
Once again, proving that you dont know what your talking about. If you cant understand how amazing +225% LP gain per LVL 4 mission which are ******** easy to run as minmatar becuase lasers cant track for **** from amarr rats then you sire should probably re-evaluate your knowledge on the FW mechanics.
What I understand is that Gall/Caldari and Amar/Minm Fw space are very different. I should have defined that I was speaking of my home space, gallente warzone, where T2 is resilient since many weeks. You're right 225% mission Lp sounds amazing, but as it seems, no one appears to care about it in Gall/Cald space. Apparently everyone turns to Minmatar zone to run missions, thus creating this unbalance between warzones. You're right, I have little knowledge of minmatar warzone, I can only tell you that if you're looking for honorable combat, you should come reside in Placid/Black rise, where you wont have to wait more than 5 minutes to be engaged, and thus forget your pains and misery, and all this sufering of yours will seem far away in our beloved homespace. Change sides. Gall/Cald to die with honor, Min/amar for the pocket money. There, your problem is solved. Now get off the forums, leave your corporation and join Moira. The gallente are just as bad as minmatar for rabbit plexing. In general the 2 fronts are about the same for "honorable combat." Gallente does a bit more gatecamping than the minmatar or amarr but thats about it. Everyone pretty much acknowledged that runnign rabbit alts in pve ships is the way to win/hold over 90% of the space in the current mechanics. Can we not even agree that ccp should do something to make the game better?
Just ignore the fact that caldari score 30-40% more vp every day than gallente. Whats one more fact to ignore when you are in the swing of it, right Cearain? |

Terhiss
Moira. Villore Accords
30
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 02:01:00 -
[90] - Quote
Cearain wrote: Can we not even agree that ccp should do something to make the game better?
Can we not agree that the game is awesome and FacWar is a lot better than in the past? |

Rommell Drako
T-Cells Moar Tears
45
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 02:05:00 -
[91] - Quote
Terhiss wrote:Rommell Drako wrote: The incentive is if you own t5, then you get the +225% bonus to mission Lp. Which is like 100k LP per missions. Which you can then use to abuse the LP store. So there is your reason to be in t5 and own all the systems. Only the war zone farmers plex and they only do it so they can keep that tier 5 or 4 of the warzone so their SB alts can make bank.
Once again, proving that you dont know what your talking about. If you cant understand how amazing +225% LP gain per LVL 4 mission which are ******** easy to run as minmatar becuase lasers cant track for **** from amarr rats then you sire should probably re-evaluate your knowledge on the FW mechanics.
What I understand is that Gall/Caldari and Amar/Minm Fw space are very different. I should have defined that I was speaking of my home space, gallente warzone, where T2 is resilient since many weeks. You're right 225% mission Lp sounds amazing, but as it seems, no one appears to care about it in Gall/Cald space. Apparently everyone turns to Minmatar zone to run missions, thus creating this unbalance between warzones. You're right, I have little knowledge of minmatar warzone, I can only tell you that if you're looking for honorable combat, you should come reside in Placid/Black rise, where you wont have to wait more than 5 minutes to be engaged, and thus forget your pains and misery, and all this sufering of yours will seem far away in our beloved homespace. Change sides. Gall/Cald to die with honor, Min/amar for the pocket money. There, your problem is solved. Now get off the forums, leave your corporation and join Moira.
|

Rommell Drako
T-Cells Moar Tears
45
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 02:09:00 -
[92] - Quote
Terhiss wrote:Cearain wrote: Can we not even agree that ccp should do something to make the game better?
Can we not agree that the game is awesome and FacWar is a lot better than in the past?
Putting your hand in your pocket and pulling out dog **** is better then pulling out horse ****... Still sucks that you pulled **** out of your pocket...
Why are you one of those people that is willing to settle with subpar? Excell and push yourself for something better. (and push ccp) |

Terhiss
Moira. Villore Accords
31
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 02:18:00 -
[93] - Quote
Rommell Drako wrote: Putting your hand in your pocket and pulling out dog **** is better then pulling out horse ****... Still sucks that you pulled **** out of your pocket...
but why would you have **** in your pocket sir? you seem confused on how trousers are meant to function sir |

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
898
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 02:19:00 -
[94] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:Cearain wrote:Terhiss wrote:Rommell Drako wrote: The incentive is if you own t5, then you get the +225% bonus to mission Lp. Which is like 100k LP per missions. Which you can then use to abuse the LP store. So there is your reason to be in t5 and own all the systems. Only the war zone farmers plex and they only do it so they can keep that tier 5 or 4 of the warzone so their SB alts can make bank.
Once again, proving that you dont know what your talking about. If you cant understand how amazing +225% LP gain per LVL 4 mission which are ******** easy to run as minmatar becuase lasers cant track for **** from amarr rats then you sire should probably re-evaluate your knowledge on the FW mechanics.
What I understand is that Gall/Caldari and Amar/Minm Fw space are very different. I should have defined that I was speaking of my home space, gallente warzone, where T2 is resilient since many weeks. You're right 225% mission Lp sounds amazing, but as it seems, no one appears to care about it in Gall/Cald space. Apparently everyone turns to Minmatar zone to run missions, thus creating this unbalance between warzones. You're right, I have little knowledge of minmatar warzone, I can only tell you that if you're looking for honorable combat, you should come reside in Placid/Black rise, where you wont have to wait more than 5 minutes to be engaged, and thus forget your pains and misery, and all this sufering of yours will seem far away in our beloved homespace. Change sides. Gall/Cald to die with honor, Min/amar for the pocket money. There, your problem is solved. Now get off the forums, leave your corporation and join Moira. The gallente are just as bad as minmatar for rabbit plexing. In general the 2 fronts are about the same for "honorable combat." Gallente does a bit more gatecamping than the minmatar or amarr but thats about it. Everyone pretty much acknowledged that runnign rabbit alts in pve ships is the way to win/hold over 90% of the space in the current mechanics. Can we not even agree that ccp should do something to make the game better? Just ignore the fact that caldari score 30-40% more vp every day than gallente. Whats one more fact to ignore when you are in the swing of it, right Cearain?
When cross plexing vp is not included you can't get an accurate picture.
But that said I will admit that my individual observations are anecdotal so it may be that caldari has more rabbit plexers than gallente and minmatar. It really doesn't matter which militia has more. The problem is rabbit plexing is the best way to win the war. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Juan Rayo
Justified Chaos
80
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 02:20:00 -
[95] - Quote
Cosmo Raata wrote:X Gallentius wrote:Cosmo Raata wrote:Hell, its evidence that PvP & Plexing don't currently mix at all. Separate activities.
Really? I plex and get pvp all the time. And even Cearain uses plexes to get pvp. You might want to rephrase your statement. And since it works for you that must mean its awesome. Congrats. Atron ftw.
And since it DOESN-¿T work for you that must mean its broken. Congrats. |

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
898
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 02:32:00 -
[96] - Quote
Terhiss wrote:Cearain wrote: Can we not even agree that ccp should do something to make the game better?
Can we not agree that the game is awesome and FacWar is a lot better than in the past? As a matter of fact you know what? I have a solution. My previous dialog with Rommell Drako has led me to the following; why dont we just agree that Minmatar space is farming ground, and Gall/Caldari where the money is spent on war. We all tacitly agree that one space remains our money mill, the other our field of battle. away with the phonecalls
FW sov is still a broken pve race.
There are more people in fw low sec and so there is more pvp. So yes eve as a whole is better, we can agree on that. I also agree that plex pvp is awesome.
Again there is very little difference between the two warzones as far as finding pvp in the plexes. Same mechanics yield the same game play.
If you want caldari gallente space to be an actual warzone then do timer rollbacks and allow the players to have real time intel where complexes are being captured so they can go and fight for every plex.
If we did that in one of the warzones, we would indeed see that one is full of rabbits and the other is full of pvp. The problem is you won't be able to convince your gallente friends to allow their rabbit plexing alts to be nerfed. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
903
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 02:37:00 -
[97] - Quote
Juan Rayo wrote:Cosmo Raata wrote:X Gallentius wrote:Cosmo Raata wrote:Hell, its evidence that PvP & Plexing don't currently mix at all. Separate activities.
Really? I plex and get pvp all the time. And even Cearain uses plexes to get pvp. You might want to rephrase your statement. And since it works for you that must mean its awesome. Congrats. Atron ftw. And since it DOESN-¿T work for you that must mean its broken. Congrats.
It works the same for everyone. If you really want to win as much sov as you can for your militia then avoid all pvp.
If you want pvp you can use plexes too, but don't wait 15 minutes in one to capture it. Thats for alts to do, not pvpers. 9 times out of 10 few will even know you are there let alone come fight you.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Juan Rayo
Justified Chaos
80
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 02:43:00 -
[98] - Quote
Here-¦s another try at this discussion...
1. No, FW is not perfect and far from it. It is however MUCH better than it ever was in the past, and CCP has done a great job in the past iterations. Does it need fixing? for sure (as everything in Eve. I mean come on look at Nullsec and count your blessings) but it-¦s not "broken".
2. That some -or even many- people come to post threads about FW being broken doesn-¦t mean it is, because their opinion is not that of all the people playing the FW game. On the flip side, if people came here to post threads about how it-¦s perfect, they would also be wrong to generalize their own particular and personal opinion and try to impose it on others.
3. If you have problems holding on to your systems, instead of yelling at ccp and calling them "scared bitches"... have you really stopped to consider yelling at the many many amarr that have minmatar plexing alts and are thus ******* you over? if yo have problem holding on to systems because the alt plexers come plex it up when you are not online, have you considered recruiting for that particular problematic tz and or talking to corps on that problematic timezone and getting them to move and help defend the system?
Have you stopped to think that there are so many Amarr (and caldari and some gallente too) corps and alliances that live in highsec or non fw lowsec that if they moved into their own FW system they might easily hold it down thus helping raise the tier status for the whole militia? and that those corps could also share intel channels and help each other out?
Note that these are all PLAYER actions that can influence the warzone without whining to CCP about it. Now if you want to whine and cry about the need for a timer rollback and maybe corp LP tax yeah sure I-¿ll be holding signs and shooting structures in Jita right there with you.
Maybe that just not possible on the minmatar/amarr front, I am not familiar with the area, but it seems to work for some caldari corps and it certainly works for Gallente corps. Hell, there are even Amarr corps defending their systems right now.
You say faction warfare is "broken" when CCPs own numbers show there are more fights happening, more stuff getting blown up. I say faction warfare is a mechanic created to do just that: give people the chance to duke it out in losec, and from that particular point of view, I-¦d say it-¦s working.
Just because your particular experience is ****** up do not pretend to impose it on others, nor build strawmen about us being interested in keeping it that way and being full of is. If anything, Gallente has less systems to plex since the squids have been laying down for a bit, and thus less isk.
It is perhaps inevitable that we will find ourselves kicked out of our home systems. Gallente spent months not too long ago at Tier 1, and we are barely into t2. You won-¦t hear us bitching about it tho, because even if we ARE kicked out of our home systems, it-¦ll be fighting and having tons of fun. |

Taoist Dragon
Bastion of Mad Behaviour Caldari State Capturing
404
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 02:59:00 -
[99] - Quote
FW is fine.
I wish the people whining about FW would just up and leave it if they are so pissed at it.....
Go be pirates or some ****!
The mechanics are sound but the players who use them are flawed. People who have alts in other miltitias to 'farm LP' lose their ability to whine about FW IMO.
Most of the people I know in Amarr are there for a fight. A lot of them have minnie alts that farm. When they whine I just tell the to HTFU and remove their alts from minniw militia.
I think most FW players should get a cup of liquid concrete upon signing up so the can HTFU and just enjoy the game without sounding like a bunch of schoolgirls who have broke a nail! That is the Way, the Tao.
Balance is everything. |

2manno Asp
The Imperial Fedaykin Amarrian Commandos
260
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 03:01:00 -
[100] - Quote
Terhiss wrote:Cearain wrote: Can we not even agree that ccp should do something to make the game better?
Can we not agree that the game is awesome and FacWar is a lot better than in the past? As a matter of fact you know what? I have a solution. My previous dialog with Rommell Drako has led me to the following; why dont we just agree that Minmatar space is farming ground, and Gall/Caldari where the money is spent on war. We all tacitly agree that one space remains our money mill, the other our field of battle. away with the phonecalls
FW is better, sure. i'm getting more fights than before, and since FW is supposed to be 'warfare', that's a good thing. but philospophically speaking, having a cell phone was better than 'before', when not having one was the norm.
ofc, everyone knew that battery life was a problem, so companies rushed to fix it. having one with a longer battery life was better than having one with a shorter.
then compaines realized digital was better than cellular, so digital networks and phones were rushed to market. because having a phone that had digitized information was better than one without.
and when done, everyone knew that weight and size were problems, so companies rushed to fix that. having lighter, smaller, phones vs heavier ones... now that was a great improvement.
and ofc, everyone knew that more capable phones were better still, so companies rushed to make them. having a phone that's smart is better than one that is stupid.
iow saying FW is better than before has become moot. better than "X" is known not variable. you may say it's unfortunate, or inconvenient, or uncomfortable, or unwanted. but there it is.
'better' than now is what's relavant. what is being done now to make it better? make a relavant argument, else remain irrelavant. |

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
903
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 03:01:00 -
[101] - Quote
Fact: Sov in 90% of systems is decided by rabbits. I call that broken. Maybe you don't. It doesn't matter how we characterize that fact, we both agree its a fact.
You keep talking as though people care to hold on to 2 or 3 "home systems." Rational people don't care. If amarr holds onto 2 systems and recruits people to orbit buttons 24/7 in those 2 systems we are still tier 1. Better to not waste time having alts spin buttons and just base in egg. That way you can spend your time in this game doing what you signed up for fw to do -PVP.
In order to win enough systems to even make it to tier 2 or 3 you need to have rabbit plexers on your side. That is why pvpers think fw sov is broken. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
1349
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 03:19:00 -
[102] - Quote
Juan, I guess we're doing it all wrong. Let's move to nullsec, err, non FW low sec, err.. non sov 0.0, err. high sec, and get some real fights. 
|

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
903
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 03:31:00 -
[103] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Juan, I guess we're doing it all wrong. Let's move to nullsec, err, non FW low sec, err.. non sov 0.0, err. high sec, and get some real fights. 
So far this thread has hit most of the main arguments against making fw pvp:
1) If you don't like fw leave!
and if you leave,
2) Your not even in fw so your opinion doesn't count!
3) Its better than it was before, when it was also broken
4) There is already so much pvp in fw no one could possibly want more.
and here is a new one by xg:
5) you get more pvp in fw than you do in high sec so that proves its not broken.
There are a few more arguments against making fw sov pvp that need be mentioned to make this thread complete.
Meanwhile keep ignoring the fact that sov in over 90% of systems is decided by rabbits. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Xolve
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
1369
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 03:33:00 -
[104] - Quote
Cosmo Raata wrote:Please comment more about how EPA was factional warfare.
I never said it was.  Inappropriate signature removed. Navigator. |

Cosmo Raata
T-Cells Moar Tears
48
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 04:12:00 -
[105] - Quote
Juan Rayo wrote:Here-¦s another try at this discussion...
1. No, FW is not perfect and far from it. It is however MUCH better than it ever was in the past, and CCP has done a great job in the past iterations. Does it need fixing? for sure (as everything in Eve. I mean come on look at Nullsec and count your blessings) but it-¦s not "broken".
2. That some -or even many- people come to post threads about FW being broken doesn-¦t mean it is, because their opinion is not that of all the people playing the FW game. On the flip side, if people came here to post threads about how it-¦s perfect, they would also be wrong to generalize their own particular and personal opinion and try to impose it on others.
3. If you have problems holding on to your systems, instead of yelling at ccp and calling them "scared bitches"... have you really stopped to consider yelling at the many many amarr that have minmatar plexing alts and are thus ******* you over? if yo have problem holding on to systems because the alt plexers come plex it up when you are not online, have you considered recruiting for that particular problematic tz and or talking to corps on that problematic timezone and getting them to move and help defend the system?
Have you stopped to think that there are so many Amarr (and caldari and some gallente too) corps and alliances that live in highsec or non fw lowsec that if they moved into their own FW system they might easily hold it down thus helping raise the tier status for the whole militia? and that those corps could also share intel channels and help each other out?
Note that these are all PLAYER actions that can influence the warzone without whining to CCP about it. Now if you want to whine and cry about the need for a timer rollback and maybe corp LP tax yeah sure I-¿ll be holding signs and shooting structures in Jita right there with you.
Maybe that just not possible on the minmatar/amarr front, I am not familiar with the area, but it seems to work for some caldari corps and it certainly works for Gallente corps. Hell, there are even Amarr corps defending their systems right now.
You say faction warfare is "broken" when CCPs own numbers show there are more fights happening, more stuff getting blown up. I say faction warfare is a mechanic created to do just that: give people the chance to duke it out in losec, and from that particular point of view, I-¦d say it-¦s working.
Just because your particular experience is ****** up do not pretend to impose it on others, nor build strawmen about us being interested in keeping it that way and being full of isk. If anything, Gallente has less systems to plex since the squids have been laying down for a bit, and thus less isk.
It is perhaps inevitable that we will find ourselves kicked out of our home systems. Faction Warfare has gone thru cycles since it started, with one side being dominant and then getting kicked in the nuts. Gallente spent months not too long ago at Tier 1, and we are barely into t2. You won-¦t hear us bitching about it tho, because even if we ARE kicked out of our home systems, it-¦ll be fighting and having tons of fun in the current imperfect in need of fixing but also great version of Faction Warfare.
Another pilot happy with mediocrity.
Starting to really love this argument; More fights equals all fixed. lol
P.S. Did 20 minutes of typing up this rubbish make your nose more brown that it already was?
|

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
1350
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 04:18:00 -
[106] - Quote
Cosmo Raata wrote:Starting to really love this argument; More fights equals all fixed. lol Nah just mostly fixed. |

Flyinghotpocket
Amarrian Vengeance
117
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 04:31:00 -
[107] - Quote
Cearain wrote:
Sahtogas is heating up recently but it traditionally isn't even one of the top pvp systems on that front. Usuually its just lots of boring dplexing. You and your corp may be fine with that, (and cry bloody murder anytime someone suggests changes that would make the war pvp) but others want to actually fight a war.
idk what war youzone you been fighting in the past few years. sahtogas has always been a hot area, being 1-2 jumps from the front lines and all.
and most of the saht locals dont give a **** about d-plexing. |

Taoist Dragon
Bastion of Mad Behaviour Caldari State Capturing
405
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 04:45:00 -
[108] - Quote
After so much shite being posted i nthis thread I actually went back and looked at the original post.
It is textbook whining to CCP.
Basically the OP doesn't like FW but doens't give any potential 'fixes' and is mainly just complaining because over areas of eve are being looked at (i.e. null and explo)
If you want CCP to actually do something you need to give clear arguments as to why something is 'broken' and a justification for 'fixing' it, not just "wah wah wah I don't like it anymore do something CCP!!!" This is just another whine thread.
Does the current itteration of FW generate fights? : definately
Is it the kind of fights you want? : doesn't sound like it so maybe it's time for you to move on and find the kind of fights you want. That is the Way, the Tao.
Balance is everything. |

Cosmo Raata
T-Cells Moar Tears
48
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 04:54:00 -
[109] - Quote
Taoist Dragon wrote:After so much shite being posted i nthis thread I actually went back and looked at the original post.
It is textbook whining to CCP.
Basically the OP doesn't like FW but doens't give any potential 'fixes' and is mainly just complaining because over areas of eve are being looked at (i.e. null and explo)
If you want CCP to actually do something you need to give clear arguments as to why something is 'broken' and a justification for 'fixing' it, not just "wah wah wah I don't like it anymore do something CCP!!!" This is just another whine thread.
Does the current itteration of FW generate fights? : definately
Is it the kind of fights you want? : doesn't sound like it so maybe it's time for you to move on and find the kind of fights you want.
You clearly don't read then, because I'm strictly trying to get CCP to accept someones idea, I'm not here to prove anything. Fact of the matter is that all too many have suggested ideas to make it better and CCP sits on their asses.
So, while you would like to coax me into some kind of "here is your proof" argument, keep in mind that I simply want CCP to be exposed for the real reasons no change happens, they fear losing subscriptions more than making things better. |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
1350
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 05:04:00 -
[110] - Quote
Quote: Best example is the Amarr Militia and Fweddit. Fweddit has a massive amount of kills and PVPs all the time. Yet the minmatar are (were) winning the warzone due to broken farming mechanics.
My initial response was to this quote above. Using a corporation who station camps their non-FW high sec gate as an example of how FW is screwed up is laughable. (We should be winning, we pvp more!, lol)
The rest... yeah CCP should do something, but it's not the end of the Eve universe if they don't. |

Lin Suizei
137
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 05:50:00 -
[111] - Quote
Cosmo Raata wrote:You clearly don't read then, because I'm strictly trying to get CCP to accept someones idea
Wrong forum then, this should've been in GD because no-one from CCP seems to be listening (or if they are, acknowledging the problem) here. Xeros S*** > are you really suprised? im not here to pvp so why the fuc not Xeros S**** > oh go cry somewhere else, im not in fw for the ****** pvp
Welcome to faction war. |

Bad Messenger
Nasranite Watch
451
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 06:12:00 -
[112] - Quote
Rommell Drako wrote:Bad Messenger wrote:FW is working fine, CCP set goal they want to achieve and stats show that they managed to do good changes.
The fact that most players had different goal what changes should do does not matter, FW is fine, get over it.
maybe if we wait couple years stats will go down after hype and CCP has to do something, other option is that players start to play FW like CCP planned, i do not see reason why that should happen, but hey who am i to see future always. FW is an isk faucet for risk averse cloak fit atrons. If working as intended then thats fine. But it is not a Faction Warfare anymore. Low sec Missioning and beacon orbiting maybe... If this is what CCP wants then thats fine. Just change the name. If CCP will say on this thread that it is working as intended... that afk plexers is what they want... then I would not be surpirsed when amarr stops running a single plex, only pvps, and publicly announces that every single amarr pilot has a minni mission running alt...
CCP has said many time in their streams from fan fest etc... that they are happy about fw. |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
1350
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 06:18:00 -
[113] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:And +1 to Amarrian VENGEANCE who actually have the balls to live in FW space. . Requoting for truth. Full apologies to Dan and hotpockets for getting name wrong. Will update original post. |

Taoist Dragon
Bastion of Mad Behaviour Caldari State Capturing
405
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 06:23:00 -
[114] - Quote
Cosmo Raata wrote:Taoist Dragon wrote:After so much shite being posted i nthis thread I actually went back and looked at the original post.
It is textbook whining to CCP.
Basically the OP doesn't like FW but doens't give any potential 'fixes' and is mainly just complaining because over areas of eve are being looked at (i.e. null and explo)
If you want CCP to actually do something you need to give clear arguments as to why something is 'broken' and a justification for 'fixing' it, not just "wah wah wah I don't like it anymore do something CCP!!!" This is just another whine thread.
Does the current itteration of FW generate fights? : definately
Is it the kind of fights you want? : doesn't sound like it so maybe it's time for you to move on and find the kind of fights you want. You clearly don't read then, because I'm strictly trying to get CCP to accept someones idea, I'm not here to prove anything. Fact of the matter is that all too many have suggested ideas to make it better and CCP sits on their asses. So, while you would like to coax me into some kind of "here is your proof" argument, keep in mind that I simply want CCP to be exposed for the real reasons no change happens, they fear losing subscriptions more than making things better.
So yes this is basically a whine thread cos you are not getting cookies right? That is the Way, the Tao.
Balance is everything. |

Tsobai Hashimoto
Mayhem and Ruin
140
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 06:42:00 -
[115] - Quote
Rommell Drako wrote:Tsobai Hashimoto wrote:Rommell Drako wrote:Bad Messenger wrote:FW is working fine, CCP set goal they want to achieve and stats show that they managed to do good changes.
The fact that most players had different goal what changes should do does not matter, FW is fine, get over it.
maybe if we wait couple years stats will go down after hype and CCP has to do something, other option is that players start to play FW like CCP planned, i do not see reason why that should happen, but hey who am i to see future always. FW is an isk faucet for risk averse cloak fit atrons. If working as intended then thats fine. But it is not a Faction Warfare anymore. Low sec Missioning and beacon orbiting maybe... If this is what CCP wants then thats fine. Just change the name. If CCP will say on this thread that it is working as intended... that afk plexers is what they want... then I would not be surpirsed when amarr stops running a single plex, only pvps, and publicly announces that every single amarr pilot has a minni mission running alt... that is exactly what im thinking about doing how much would two pilots cost me at the bazzar that can fly sb? wouldnt even need extra accounts to pay for plex. transfer one to my main one on my alt and bam....run minnie missions once or twice a week. make a bill a week and get **** killed **** thats a great idea lol I actually do this already. Honestly all you need is a meta 4 torp launcher and t2 fit purifier. Character bazaar can probably pull for like 1-2bil. Its super easy and you can actually make around 1 bil per 6 hours. notice how i PVE on my minni alt and pvp on my amarr main. Because that shows the system is working as intended.
Oh I know its easy, I moved back into FW onto minnies side to soak up a fat pile of isk and then get back to the side where I can get a fight after every undock......
but just having pve alts sounds even better..... i already own two accounts and when I pvp I take out my purifier and hound and run missions, goes pretty quick.
just did some price checks on char bazaar, looks like i can get a perfect SB pilot for around 2.5 -3.5 billion isk, buy two of them, slap them on my same accounts,
PVE when needed, FW PVP when I want
win win
FW isnt broken lol 
|

Albercheck
Crossfire Incorporated I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
5
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 06:55:00 -
[116] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Quote: Best example is the Amarr Militia and Fweddit. Fweddit has a massive amount of kills and PVPs all the time. Yet the minmatar are (were) winning the warzone due to broken farming mechanics.
My initial response was to this quote above. Using a corporation who station camps their non-FW high sec gate as an example of how FW is screwed up is laughable. (We should be winning, we pvp more!, lol) The rest... yeah CCP should do something, but it's not the end of the Eve universe if they don't.
Yet, Fweddit last week scored the 2nd most kills out of every [non-npc] Faction Warfare corporation -- In Exile was first place. And, upon a closer examination of the killboards, virtually zero of those FW kills happened in Egghelende. So, I think your initial notion is incorrect. Egghelende kills account for a large amount of iWhip kills for sure, but obviously Fweddit & Company PvP outside of Egghelende.
Moreover, did you consider the lack of FW kills could perhaps be due to Eve's rampant risk aversion? Yesterday I plexed in a hull tanked, auto-cannon bantam. Yet, on two separate occasions, I warped into a plex with a single enemy Minmatar inside. The Minmatar warps out even with no one else in local. This isn't a typical "ONLY MINMATAR ARE PUSSIES" rant, but just showing that just because some groups may be "lacking" kills does not mean they are not actively trying to look for kills.
Even further, do you know how difficult it can be for a larger group like Fweddit to get a fun-sized skirmish? Fweddit can regularly roll with 40+ pilots, but will [understandably] rarely find a tango partner. In my experience, the decently sized skirmishes actually come mostly from neuts, local pirates, or the occasional visiting 0.0 entities. This isn't meant to be a bash at other Minmatar FW organizations, but I think speaks to the larger point raised in this (and many other threads) that larger, more militaristic muscle does not necessarily equate to Factional Warfare success. And, in my opinion, such muscle should actually equate to Factional Warfare success.
Instead, Factional Warfare success seems to involve coordinating a mass-scale effort orbiting beacons for 15+ minutes and upgrading systems every once in a while. If you're doing it right, you are actually trying to minimize conflict so you can complete more plexes. This sort of success is noteworthy considering the scale, but does not necessarily speak to "Warfare" part of Factional Warfare. Thus, in its current form, Faction Warfare seems to be a bit of a misnomer.
Edit: Source for statement in first paragraph: https://api.eveonline.com/eve/FacWarTopStats.xml.aspx |

Bad Messenger
Nasranite Watch
452
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 08:59:00 -
[117] - Quote
Cosmo Raata wrote:Taoist Dragon wrote:After so much shite being posted i nthis thread I actually went back and looked at the original post.
It is textbook whining to CCP.
Basically the OP doesn't like FW but doens't give any potential 'fixes' and is mainly just complaining because over areas of eve are being looked at (i.e. null and explo)
If you want CCP to actually do something you need to give clear arguments as to why something is 'broken' and a justification for 'fixing' it, not just "wah wah wah I don't like it anymore do something CCP!!!" This is just another whine thread.
Does the current itteration of FW generate fights? : definately
Is it the kind of fights you want? : doesn't sound like it so maybe it's time for you to move on and find the kind of fights you want. You clearly don't read then, because I'm strictly trying to get CCP to accept someones idea, I'm not here to prove anything. Fact of the matter is that all too many have suggested ideas to make it better and CCP sits on their asses. So, while you would like to coax me into some kind of "here is your proof" argument, keep in mind that I simply want CCP to be exposed for the real reasons no change happens, they fear losing subscriptions more than making things better.
CCP does not see any problems on current FW, their goals may be different from yours. And all thing CCP wanted to achieve seems good results so they are not going to 'fix' anything. |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
577
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 09:09:00 -
[118] - Quote
Albercheck wrote:X Gallentius wrote:Quote: Best example is the Amarr Militia and Fweddit. Fweddit has a massive amount of kills and PVPs all the time. Yet the minmatar are (were) winning the warzone due to broken farming mechanics.
My initial response was to this quote above. Using a corporation who station camps their non-FW high sec gate as an example of how FW is screwed up is laughable. (We should be winning, we pvp more!, lol) The rest... yeah CCP should do something, but it's not the end of the Eve universe if they don't. Yet, Fweddit last week scored the 2nd most kills out of every [non-npc] Faction Warfare corporation -- In Exile was first place. And, upon a closer examination of the killboards, virtually zero of those FW kills happened in Egghelende. So, I think your initial notion is incorrect. Egghelende kills account for a large amount of iWhip kills for sure, but obviously Fweddit & Company PvP outside of Egghelende. Moreover, did you consider the lack of FW kills could perhaps be due to Eve's rampant risk aversion? Yesterday I plexed in a hull tanked, auto-cannon bantam. Yet, on two separate occasions, I warped into a plex with a single enemy Minmatar inside. The Minmatar warps out even with no one else in local. This isn't a typical "ONLY MINMATAR ARE PUSSIES" rant, but just showing that just because some groups may be "lacking" kills does not mean they are not actively trying to look for kills. Even further, do you know how difficult it can be for a larger group like Fweddit to get a fun-sized skirmish? Fweddit can regularly roll with 40+ pilots, but will [understandably] rarely find a tango partner. In my experience, the decently sized skirmishes actually come mostly from neuts, local pirates, or the occasional visiting 0.0 entities. This isn't meant to be a bash at other Minmatar FW organizations, but I think speaks to the larger point raised in this (and many other threads) that larger, more militaristic muscle does not necessarily equate to Factional Warfare success. And, in my opinion, such muscle should actually equate to Factional Warfare success. Instead, Factional Warfare success seems to involve coordinating a mass-scale effort orbiting beacons for 15+ minutes and upgrading systems every once in a while. If you're doing it right, you are actually trying to minimize conflict so you can complete more plexes. This sort of success is noteworthy considering the scale, but does not necessarily speak to "Warfare" part of Factional Warfare. Thus, in its current form, Faction Warfare seems to be a bit of a misnomer. Edit: Source for statement in first paragraph: https://api.eveonline.com/eve/FacWarTopStats.xml.aspx
TL;DR - CCP please fix it so that 40 people in a single plex under little or no risk are more effective than 40 single people in 40 plexes looking for solo and small gang fights.
TL;DR 2 - CCP dont encourage blobs in FW like they do in dullsec and this upsets me. Please fix FW so its not broken like dullsec! |

Albercheck
Crossfire Incorporated I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
5
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 09:31:00 -
[119] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:Albercheck wrote:[quote=X Gallentius] more stuff TL;DR - CCP please fix it so that 40 people in a single plex under little or no risk are more effective than 40 single people in 40 plexes looking for solo and small gang fights. TL;DR 2 - CCP dont encourage blobs in FW like they do in dullsec and this upsets me. Please fix FW so its not broken like dullsec!
Uh, nothing in my post was prescriptive at all -- did you ever see me say "should"? My post was completely descriptive and a response to highlight an entity that was being wrongly characterized by another poster. |

Muad 'dib
The Imperial Fedaykin Amarrian Commandos
894
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 09:39:00 -
[120] - Quote
Milton Middleson wrote: Why should kills directly affect a war?
seriously?
Ships in space blow each other up - its what the entire game revolves around. Cosmic signature detected. . . . http://img299.imageshack.us/img299/4375/mynewsig2.jpg CCP Hilmar CEO > "why am i sweating, why is the game doing this to me"
|

Tsobai Hashimoto
Mayhem and Ruin
140
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 10:37:00 -
[121] - Quote
Muad 'dib wrote:Milton Middleson wrote: Why should kills directly affect a war?
seriously? Ships in space blow each other up - its what the entire game revolves around.
But it shouldn't count towards the contested amount of a system
I do think FW needs to be fixed but that is not the way to do it, If someone has the isk and resources to throw away 100s of ships but still hold the plexs, well so be it...........Having each kill count towards SOV control would only make bigger blobs and trolling new pilots for deaths
Plus if I have 500 ships to your 100 in a war, it does not matter if I loose 300, as long as all yours die or are distracted enough for us to take the objective
See US Tanks Vs German Tanks in WWII 
Winning by attrition is a very long and difficult process, and in FW it could have an effect, the issue is isk in FW is to easy to come by so it does not....reduce the LP payouts and even them out, and you would see your PVP "worth" more on the war effort
But as long as a Minnie SB can earn 150+ million isk an hour, then even killing T1 frigs and Cruisers 5:1 will have very little effect on the war effort. This would be the same case if in real life as well (see Korean War, Vietnam), other than morale, but everyone is immortal in EVE so thats moot) |

March rabbit
epTa Team Inc.
656
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 11:22:00 -
[122] - Quote
Cearain wrote:Unlike your corp where you require people to orbit a plex everyday ...
you mean first gropup of people ACTUALLY do FW? 
Cearain wrote:...lots of people view eve as a game. They joined a war against a huge number of other players so that they can pvp. you don't need to join FW to have PvP. Actually being member of militia limits your targets: you have lots of "allies". Be pirate and you can attack all these people around.
Cearain wrote:Given the broken mechanics of fw living in a low sec non fw system like egg makes sense if you are pvper. If Minmatar/gallente had more pvpers they would move in to egg too. But they want to stay safe where the enemy can't even dock ships. you mean Gal/Mil people ACTUALLY do FW? that's crazy! CALL THE POLICE! |

Vizvig
Savage Blizzard Bright Side of Death
81
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 11:24:00 -
[123] - Quote
Cosmo Raata wrote: PVE online There is no pve, there is something to force you loosing time.
Be sure here no one is slept, it's not a bug, it's a feature.
|

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
577
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 11:24:00 -
[124] - Quote
Albercheck wrote:
Uh, nothing in my post was prescriptive at all -- did you ever see me say "should"? My post was completely descriptive and a response to highlight an entity that was being wrongly characterized by another poster.
Albercheck wrote: ...more militaristic muscle does not necessarily equate to Factional Warfare success. And, in my opinion, such muscle should actually equate to Factional Warfare success
So um, yeah. |

Muad 'dib
The Imperial Fedaykin Amarrian Commandos
896
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 12:21:00 -
[125] - Quote
Well the only thing that happens when a FW player kills another on the opposite side, if they get a laughably tiny amount of LP - yet if it was money they were after why not plex instead.
farmers only want isk, but effect the systems the people who live in (or would like to) the area for both isk and pvp or just pvp.
Farmers dont have 'stuff' to move around, they dont need a base and they dont care if a system is dockable or not, they just go to the next one along - when and if they die they scurry back off to high sec to grab another. This is something people who play fw for more than the money have to deal with and if largly out of their hands.
This is why we are seeing people in non fw system who WANT to be able to participate in all aspects of fw but cant.
Cosmic signature detected. . . . http://img299.imageshack.us/img299/4375/mynewsig2.jpg CCP Hilmar CEO > "why am i sweating, why is the game doing this to me"
|

Colt Blackhawk
The Amarrian Expendables
122
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 12:25:00 -
[126] - Quote
I already once had this idea: EVERY Ceo in gw should grab his peeps and petition the f.. out of CCP to fix that sh... Fweddit, Commandos, Exile, Koza, 7th alone from amarr mili could get surely maybe 500 petitions out within some days. If every militia would do that we would bury whole CCP with fw pettions and show them what we think about that they don-¦t give a f... |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
1352
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 12:48:00 -
[127] - Quote
Albercheck wrote:... Even further, do you know how difficult it can be for a larger group like Fweddit to get a fun-sized skirmish? Fweddit can regularly roll with 40+ pilots, but will [understandably] rarely find a tango partner. In my experience, the decently sized skirmishes actually come mostly from neuts, local pirates, or the occasional visiting 0.0 entities. This isn't meant to be a bash at other Minmatar FW organizations, but I think speaks to the larger point raised in this (and many other threads) that larger, more militaristic muscle does not necessarily equate to Factional Warfare success. And, in my opinion, such muscle should actually equate to Factional Warfare success. Instead, Factional Warfare success seems to involve coordinating a mass-scale effort orbiting beacons for 15+ minutes and upgrading systems every once in a while. If you're doing it right, you are actually trying to minimize conflict so you can complete more plexes. This sort of success is noteworthy considering the scale, but does not necessarily speak to "Warfare" part of Factional Warfare. Thus, in its current form, Faction Warfare seems to be a bit of a misnomer. Edit: Source for statement in first paragraph: https://api.eveonline.com/eve/FacWarTopStats.xml.aspx Fair enough. Your corporation should be dominating FW. IMO, none of the proposed changes will fix your main issue (lack of TZ coverage), but yes something should be implemented. |

ALUCARD 1208
Spiritus Draconis Sicarius Draconis
174
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 13:45:00 -
[128] - Quote
Cearain wrote:ALUCARD 1208 wrote:yawn another thread for cearain to sperg about that damn notification .... IM OUT Another thread that points out fw is still a broken carebear race. So yes another thread with the solution. Why do you think we keep getting these threads?
Bcos the whiney bitches from cal/amarr militia wanna cry its broke instead of manning up GÖÑ HIGH FIVES GÖÑ-á |

Zarnak Wulf
In Exile. Imperial Outlaws.
1189
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 13:53:00 -
[129] - Quote
The whole FW system leaves one scratching their head. The reasons for holding a system, in order of importance, are:
Docking Rights Cumulative Effect towards Tier Bragging Rights Denial of Enemy Mission Agents
Does anyone remember the large thread for system upgrade ideas in F&I? Nothing really came of it. I have yet to log on and hear a corpmate cursing that they lost the extra research slots from enemy plexing! In my eyes system ownership should give you some financial gain outside of FW. Owning a little fiefdom should be the focus - the fact that we get LP to PvP or run plexes is fantastic - but to make that the center of the system is ass backwards. People don't really need to be paid 2x or 3x the amount to circle a button. The end result of the FW system ownership. The ownership should bring the goods - not the process of acquiring it.
As for the TZ coverage. It's a catch 22. It's very easy to say on the forums, "hire more off-TZ pilots." It's another thing to actually do it. My corporation has been trying for months with various degrees of success. It comes back to the same issues:
Why should people join a losing faction? Why should people quit the winning faction?
This is Eve. People dog-pile onto the winning team. We can talk about the 'pendulum swinging' until we're blue in the face. The fact is the nadir of that pendulum for Amarr lasts months. It takes a Herculean effort to push it back against the Minmatar - where it will stay for mere weeks. The process of doing that also burns out a hell of a lot of pilots. We constantly either lose pilots out the back door as fast as we recruit them or they simply stop logging on. In the meantime on almost a daily basis I see new Minmatar pilots, corporations, and even alliances. |

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
910
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 13:53:00 -
[130] - Quote
Flyinghotpocket wrote:Cearain wrote:
Sahtogas is heating up recently but it traditionally isn't even one of the top pvp systems on that front. Usuually its just lots of boring dplexing. You and your corp may be fine with that, (and cry bloody murder anytime someone suggests changes that would make the war pvp) but others want to actually fight a war.
idk what war youzone you been fighting in the past few years. sahtogas has always been a hot area, being 1-2 jumps from the front lines and all. and most of the saht locals dont give a **** about d-plexing.
From Poetic stanzels blog:
Most Active Systems: Kamela (3473) Kourmonen (3121) Huola (2320) Sahtogas (1115) Sosala (1097)
Most Active Systems: Amamake (3986) Rens (2823) Siseide (2728) Dal (2379) Vard (1552)
There are 6 other systems with over 2 and 3xs the number of kills. In other words it you will get about 1/3 to 1/2 the number of fights in the same time. Those six systems are all within one or 2 jumps from kourm. Sahtogas is 5 jumps from kourm. Again we can characterize these facts however we want but there are the numbers.
It may have been bad luck but when I would head out there Sahtogas and its surrounding systems would be pretty dead. Lately, of course, that has changed. That was my point. Lately sahtogas has taken off and next to ammamake it has the most kills in the last 24 hours. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

ALUCARD 1208
Spiritus Draconis Sicarius Draconis
174
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 13:57:00 -
[131] - Quote
Cosmo Raata wrote:
So, while you would like to coax me into some kind of "here is your proof" argument, keep in mind that I simply want CCP to be exposed for the real reasons no change happens, they fear losing subscriptions more than making things better.
NOPE this ones easy CCP spent a year on FW u would know that if u played or was in FW long enough its time for them to move on and sort other parts of the game that ppl are raging is "broken"....
i also love how when things arnt going peoples way or its not how they want to play it its BROKEN and HOW DARE CCP NOT FIX THIS
GÖÑ HIGH FIVES GÖÑ-á |

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
910
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 14:06:00 -
[132] - Quote
ALUCARD 1208 wrote:Cearain wrote:ALUCARD 1208 wrote:yawn another thread for cearain to sperg about that damn notification .... IM OUT Another thread that points out fw is still a broken carebear race. So yes another thread with the solution. Why do you think we keep getting these threads? Bcos the whiney bitches from cal/amarr militia wanna cry its broke instead of manning up
"Manning up" and flying stabbed ships and avoiding all pvp fights? We suggest changes that would make the game a pvp and you get all upset that your gallente rabbits won't be able to hide and plex anymore.
And thank you for another standard argument against making fw sov pvp:
6) Amarr are crybabies, therefore 90% of sov should be determined by rabbits.
This post highlights the other standard arguments carebears love to make in every thread where someone suggest fw sov should be a pvp mechanic: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2946667#post2946667
Still a few more bad arguments to go, but its only page seven and you almost hit every illogical point. And, of course, you are still ignoring the fact that sov in over 90% of systems is determined by rabbits. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Milton Middleson
Rifterlings Point Blank Alliance
270
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 14:09:00 -
[133] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Fair enough. Your corporation should be dominating FW. IMO, none of the proposed changes will fix your main issue (lack of TZ coverage), but yes something should be implemented.
Why? If Fweddit has seriously outgrown faction warfare (they haven't), then they should leave. The whole point of FW is that it's an environment where the ability to mass more guys in one fleet doesn't guarantee success. The issues with FW are not that a 40-man armor cruiser blob doesn't grant you victory. (P.S. armor cruisers are boring to both fly and fight. If the FC calls for them, just say no).
(Also, I'm not sure that the largest FW alliance by a considerable margin getting outperformed by an Alliance a fifth their size is something to be impressed by). |

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
910
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 14:12:00 -
[134] - Quote
ALUCARD 1208 wrote: i also love how when things arnt going peoples way or its not how they want to play it its BROKEN and HOW DARE CCP NOT FIX THIS
Thats just it, you want the game to remain where 90% of systems' sov is decided by rabbits, we don't. At least this thread has made that much clear.
You keep defending the mechanics that promote rabbit plexing. You keeping arguing against a mechanic that would make it so the rabbits can't hide and plex anymore. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Meditril
T.R.I.A.D
263
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 14:13:00 -
[135] - Quote
Even though Zarnak is my natural enemy, I have to admit that there is a lot of truth in his posting.
Zarnak Wulf wrote:If you want real progress - these are some proposals or things in motion that might help: Remove OGB - Veterans on both sides farm the crap out of new people entering FW. Those people leave. It makes it very hard to build a Euro TZ when those people have to enter being self sufficient killers. There is no room for error in that time zone.
Put tools in the LP store to help the losing side. I-HUB upgrades to slow plex spawns would be something I have suggested in the past.
Make kills move the contested bar in addition to plexes run. If we got credit for all the farmers in Sisiede we murdered we'd still own it! 
OGB is really a pain, Hookbills and other crap going at insane speeds simply makes the game not fun. While older players either simply ignore them or bring the blob it is completely frustrating for newer players who get spanked without having any chance. If you can't remove OGB for technical reasons then at least remove the speed boosters and snake implants (or trade their bonus for something else).
I really like the idea of LP store items which help the losing side to slow down contestation. For example let us set up some special lightly defended bunkers which make all plexes in a system slowly running down for the defender side if there is no one inside of them. Make it so that bunkers can only be deployed at planets. This would encourage some more PVP by providing new tactical options. The more bunkers are installed the faster the plex timer is running down.
If killing enemy ships would also move the bar this would be really cool. Unfortunatelly I am not sure if you really can avoid misusage here. |

Veshta Yoshida
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
643
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 14:18:00 -
[136] - Quote
ALUCARD 1208 wrote:Cosmo Raata wrote:
So, while you would like to coax me into some kind of "here is your proof" argument, keep in mind that I simply want CCP to be exposed for the real reasons no change happens, they fear losing subscriptions more than making things better.
NOPE this ones easy CCP spent a year on FW u would know that if u played or was in FW long enough its time for them to move on and sort other parts of the game that ppl are raging is "broken".... i also love how when things arnt going peoples way or its not how they want to play it its BROKEN and HOW DARE CCP NOT FIX THIS If what FW is now is the result of an entire years worth of work then you are right it is not broken, what it does mean however is that CCP are incompetent beyond belief and their personnel should be banned from using computers forever more (just in case!). More reasonable interpretation of what we know is that changes were planned almost on a whim after consulting with CSM and doing a tally of what people spammed threads about. With CSM being almost exclusively null their advice obviously revolved around earning LP/Navy stuff and padding wallets and the post count begging for "MOAR! money" has always outweighed the meaningful.
Complaints have been going on since that FF roundtable presentation with more and more voices from all four militias joining in .. and with both warzones having flipped several times during that time the argument that "not going people's way.." is made rather dead.
Farming/PvE/Risk-aversion has far too much leverage in the current system, sort that and all is hunky-dory.
@OP: You are asking for too much , they will never be able to satisfy both so choose one: - CCP stop being scared, or - CCP stop being a *****. |

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
910
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 14:21:00 -
[137] - Quote
Zarnak Wulf wrote:The whole FW system leaves one scratching their head. The reasons for holding a system, in order of importance, are:
Docking Rights Cumulative Effect towards Tier Bragging Rights Denial of Enemy Mission Agents
Does anyone remember the large thread for system upgrade ideas in F&I? Nothing really came of it. I have yet to log on and hear a corpmate cursing that they lost the extra research slots from enemy plexing! In my eyes system ownership should give you some financial gain outside of FW. Owning a little fiefdom should be the focus - the fact that we get LP to PvP or run plexes is fantastic - but to make that the center of the system is ass backwards. People don't really need to be paid 2x or 3x the amount to circle a button. The end result of the FW system ownership. The ownership should bring the goods - not the process of acquiring it.
I don't think we need even more consequences for fielding the most rabbit plexers. Already the consequences are too much. We need to change how sov is won from a pve mechanic to a pvp mechanic. Once the "how you win sov" is no longer broken, then start working on consequences.
Zarnak Wulf wrote: As for the TZ coverage. It's a catch 22. It's very easy to say on the forums, "hire more off-TZ pilots." It's another thing to actually do it. My corporation has been trying for months with various degrees of success. It comes back to the same issues:
Why should people join a losing faction? Why should people quit the winning faction?
This is Eve. People dog-pile onto the winning team. We can talk about the 'pendulum swinging' until we're blue in the face. The fact is the nadir of that pendulum for Amarr lasts months. It takes a Herculean effort to push it back against the Minmatar - where it will stay for mere weeks. The process of doing that also burns out a hell of a lot of pilots. We constantly either lose pilots out the back door as fast as we recruit them or they simply stop logging on. In the meantime on almost a daily basis I see new Minmatar pilots, corporations, and even alliances.
Thats because they put forth a bunch of consequences for winning the game before they fixed how you win. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
910
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 14:37:00 -
[138] - Quote
Milton Middleson wrote:X Gallentius wrote:Fair enough. Your corporation should be dominating FW. IMO, none of the proposed changes will fix your main issue (lack of TZ coverage), but yes something should be implemented. Why? If Fweddit has seriously outgrown faction warfare (they haven't), then they should leave. The whole point of FW is that it's an environment where the ability to mass more guys in one fleet doesn't guarantee success. The issues with FW are not that a 40-man armor cruiser blob doesn't grant you victory. (P.S. armor cruisers are boring to both fly and fight. If the FC calls for them, just say no). (Also, I'm not sure that the largest FW alliance by a considerable margin getting outperformed by an Alliance a fifth their size is something to be impressed by).
I agree the blob shouldn't be the begin all and end all.
But the problem that is being expressed is that 40 pvpers, whether they stay together in the same blob or split up, will not be able to make any substantial resistance to the rabbit hordes.
Under the current mechanics if they really want to win sov they should lose the pvp fits, get stabs, and do hide and seek plexing. It shouldn't be that way.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Milton Middleson
Rifterlings Point Blank Alliance
270
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 14:50:00 -
[139] - Quote
What is a pvp sov mechanic? And how does it function when the other side is a no-show?
Don't say notifications.
Quote:Under the current mechanics if they really want to win sov they should lose the pvp fits, get stabs, and do hide and seek plexing. It shouldn't be that way. This is a better of assessment of the problem than a lot of the suggestions in this thread, but that's very easy to say and very hard to do. The obvious solution is to punish people for rabbiting, though you can't go overboard, because if, e.g., we have timer resets if you abandon the plex to the defenders, then the optimal defensive strategy is blob attackers out of plexes in sequence. The other thing is, you really don't want to punish people for trying to fight at a disadvantage or make ignoring the enemy the optimal strategy (which is sort of the case now), which is what a lot of the proposals in this thread would do. |

Rommell Drako
No Moar Tears
54
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 15:14:00 -
[140] - Quote
Before I read and catch up on what was posted since my last post I wanted to share some numbers with you.
System control numbers for each warzone
Amarr/Minmatar Vulnerable: 0 Above 90%: 1 80-90%: 2 70-80%: 2 60-70%: 3 50-60%: 7
Caldari/Gallente Vulnerable: 19 90%: 10 80-90%: 8 70-80%: 4 60-70%: 2 50-60%: 9
How are there 19 systems that are vulnerable? Why has Gallente not flipped them? (all of the vulnerable systems are caldari owned, this is the definition of Minmatar plexing alts pushing their warzone).
This is the definition of broken. No one in the gallente wants to fight the warzone. They are either also plexing, leaving the system in caldari hands so they can continue to offensive plex it (more LP), or dont understand the flip mechanics.
Anyway you look at it you have to realize this is broken. EVE FARMVILLE ONLINE is what faction warfare is and if you cant tell that by the numbers then you might not be cut out for spreadsheets online.
These numbers are also the reason why I never care for the opinions from anyone on that side of the warzone. These numbers disgust me. |

ALUCARD 1208
Spiritus Draconis Sicarius Draconis
174
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 15:16:00 -
[141] - Quote
Veshta Yoshida wrote:and with both warzones having flipped several times during that time the argument that "not going people's way.." is made rather dead.
.
ok so rewind a few months amarr pushed to t4 so did caldaris and all was rosey amarr were chestbeating on forums there battleships were flavor of the month with ppl and the battle crys was out, fweddit was announcing glitter fleets were gunna take over and minnies prepare there holes .. (even you was happy im not trolling thru that threadnaught but it was there) you was earning u was happy.
caldaris were also crowing that daddy evoke had joined and now gallentes were gunna get beat back. (all smiles here and happy)
Game at this point working as intended...................
now the sides have flipped bk its BROKEN again and its always a caldari or amarr that posts these threads ... So argument not dead
GÖÑ HIGH FIVES GÖÑ-á |

ALUCARD 1208
Spiritus Draconis Sicarius Draconis
174
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 15:19:00 -
[142] - Quote
Rommell Drako wrote:
How are there 19 systems that are vulnerable? Why has Gallente not flipped them? (all of the vulnerable systems are caldari owned, this is the definition of Minmatar plexing alts pushing their warzone).
.
Nope we dont flip them and higher the tier level to discourage farmers t2 isnt a bad payout ;)
Quote: leaving the system in caldari hands so they can continue to offensive plex it (more LP),
Wrong again you cant farm past vulnerable and cals dont deplex it so that farmers can earn putting it right bk in again while were not flipping them GÖÑ HIGH FIVES GÖÑ-á |

Muad 'dib
The Imperial Fedaykin Amarrian Commandos
898
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 15:23:00 -
[143] - Quote
ALUCARD 1208 wrote:Veshta Yoshida wrote:and with both warzones having flipped several times during that time the argument that "not going people's way.." is made rather dead.
. ok so rewind a few months amarr pushed to t4 so did caldaris and all was rosey amarr were chestbeating on forums there battleships were flavor of the month with ppl and the battle crys was out, fweddit was announcing glitter fleets were gunna take over and minnies prepare there holes .. (even you was happy im not trolling thru that threadnaught but it was there) you was earning u was happy. caldaris were also crowing that daddy evoke had joined and now gallentes were gunna get beat back. (all smiles here and happy) Game at this point working as intended................... now the sides have flipped bk its BROKEN again and its always a caldari or amarr that posts these threads ... So argument not dead
When amarr pushed t4 that was only t4, how long did they hold the highest level they had in total?
They pushed it to see if it COULD be done and to get some isk back for the LP they had. Minms reminded at a comfortable lvl and quickly regained control to a point thats it worse than it was before for the amarr.
The systems always been broken and the same amarr that whined BEFORE inferno, whined while inferno and are still whining.
Got to admire that much faith a feature to one day be balanced correctly
Cosmic signature detected. . . . http://img299.imageshack.us/img299/4375/mynewsig2.jpg CCP Hilmar CEO > "why am i sweating, why is the game doing this to me"
|

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
910
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 15:26:00 -
[144] - Quote
Milton Middleson wrote:What is a pvp sov mechanic? And how does it function when the other side is a no-show?
Don't say notifications..
LOL "don't say what will end hide and seek plexing." Notifications and a timer rollback will make fw sov a pvp mechanic. Its the same proposal that has been supported by people who want fw sov to be pvp for years. CCP Devs have actually said they are inclined to do both of them, but they obviously need to be pushed.
Notifications will greatly increase the chances that someone will show up. Right now no one shows up because 90% of the enemy militia does not even know where someone is plexing.
Its funny how people know the solution but they keep trying to dance around it.
BTW: Were you the one who said "no one will respond to the notifications" and also that "too many people will respond to the notifications" in the same post?
Milton Middleson wrote:Quote:Under the current mechanics if they really want to win sov they should lose the pvp fits, get stabs, and do hide and seek plexing. It shouldn't be that way. This is a better of assessment of the problem than a lot of the suggestions in this thread, but that's very easy to say and very hard to do. The obvious solution is to punish people for rabbiting, though you can't go overboard, because if, e.g., we have timer resets if you abandon the plex to the defenders, then the optimal defensive strategy is blob attackers out of plexes in sequence. The other thing is, you really don't want to punish people for trying to fight at a disadvantage or make ignoring the enemy the optimal strategy (which is sort of the case now), which is what a lot of the proposals in this thread would do.
Its easy to correct. There will be no hiding and hence no hide and seek plexing if the enemy is notified where plexers are. This combined with some form of timer rollback will mean that rabbits plexing is no longer as efficient compared to pvpers plexing. This is really pretty straightforward.
I agree the timer rollback will likely need to be tweaked. But this along with the notification system really should have gone in with inferno and ccp should have been tweaking it over the last year. Instead threw a bunch of isk at fw and called it fixed. But its not to late for them to pick up the ball again and start fixing fw sov properly. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

March rabbit
epTa Team Inc.
656
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 15:26:00 -
[145] - Quote
Cearain wrote: But the problem that is being expressed is that 40 pvpers, whether they stay together in the same blob or split up, will not be able to make any substantial resistance to the rabbit hordes.
3 plexes per system (large one doesn't exists for example). rabbit doesn't need to be killed - it hides when in danger.
so your 40 PvPers can cover 13 systems and prevent rabbits from taking all plexes inside.
|

Xolve
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
1371
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 15:27:00 -
[146] - Quote
Muad 'dib wrote:The systems always been broken and the same amarr that whined BEFORE inferno, whined while inferno and are still whining.
If only that put as much effort into the warzone as they did badposting on the forums... Inappropriate signature removed. Navigator. |

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
910
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 15:31:00 -
[147] - Quote
ALUCARD 1208 wrote:Veshta Yoshida wrote:and with both warzones having flipped several times during that time the argument that "not going people's way.." is made rather dead.
. ok so rewind a few months amarr pushed to t4 so did caldaris and all was rosey amarr were chestbeating on forums there battleships were flavor of the month with ppl and the battle crys was out, fweddit was announcing glitter fleets were gunna take over and minnies prepare there holes .. (even you was happy im not trolling thru that threadnaught but it was there) you was earning u was happy. caldaris were also crowing that daddy evoke had joined and now gallentes were gunna get beat back. (all smiles here and happy) Game at this point working as intended................... now the sides have flipped bk its BROKEN again and its always a caldari or amarr that posts these threads ... So argument not dead
Wow I don't think I could get a timeline that screwed up if I tried. You indeed live in an alternate reality. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Rommell Drako
No Moar Tears
55
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 15:31:00 -
[148] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:
Just ignore the fact that caldari score 30-40% more vp every day than gallente. Whats one more fact to ignore when you are in the swing of it, right Cearain?
You realize the minmatar plexers do not receive VP for taking plexes in the caldari warzone? this is why there are 19 systems vulnerable in caldari space but the caldari earn more VP then the gallente...
Please look up the actual numbers before posting. |

ALUCARD 1208
Spiritus Draconis Sicarius Draconis
174
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 15:32:00 -
[149] - Quote
Muad 'dib wrote:
They pushed it to see if it COULD be done and to get some isk back for the LP they had. Minms reminded at a comfortable lvl and quickly regained control to a point thats it worse than it was before for the amarr.
The systems always been broken and the same amarr that whined BEFORE inferno, whined while inferno and are still whining.
So they proved it could be done then the tide can be turned with cooperation and harwork + TZ coverage, Feature working as intended GÖÑ HIGH FIVES GÖÑ-á |

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
910
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 15:33:00 -
[150] - Quote
Xolve wrote:Muad 'dib wrote:The systems always been broken and the same amarr that whined BEFORE inferno, whined while inferno and are still whining. If only that put as much effort into the warzone as they did badposting on the forums...
Many people have no interest in having rabbit alts run timers and run from pvp. So we ask ccp to change the mechanics so that is no longer the winning strategy. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Veshta Yoshida
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
645
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 15:39:00 -
[151] - Quote
ALUCARD 1208 wrote:...(even you was happy im not trolling thru that threadnaught but it was there) you was earning u was happy.... Please do try to find it, because if it the one I think it is then I said pretty much the same as now.
And no I was not earning anything, I am in staunch opposition to the entire "LP-for-Everything" solution that CCP implemented and all LP I have earned since they irrevocably broke FW with the FarmWarGäó patch are put into the nearest iHub.
You see, I do not buy into the whole "standards are good, so double standards must be twice as good" idea like most of my species seem to do 
Sorry dear, been at this for a long time and have been rather consistent just as in real life. Flip-Flopping is for politicians and people with weak research skills (can't believe they even still exist in this Age of Uncle Google).
Timer autorun until reset upon contested 'touch'. VP increase based on reverse tier LP multiplier. Reduction of tier LP modifier (x5.5 for a steam roller is just obscene). Missions to hostile space only. Bunker EHP grind replaced with auto-flip after (4 - Adjacent hostile systems)+1) hours or something similar.
To start ...
Would prefer a complete re-do but that ship has sailed I am afraid so will make do with tweaks.
|

Rommell Drako
No Moar Tears
56
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 15:46:00 -
[152] - Quote
ALUCARD 1208 wrote:Veshta Yoshida wrote:and with both warzones having flipped several times during that time the argument that "not going people's way.." is made rather dead.
. ok so rewind a few months amarr pushed to t4 so did caldaris and all was rosey amarr were chestbeating on forums there battleships were flavor of the month with ppl and the battle crys was out, fweddit was announcing glitter fleets were gunna take over and minnies prepare there holes .. (even you was happy im not trolling thru that threadnaught but it was there) you was earning u was happy. caldaris were also crowing that daddy evoke had joined and now gallentes were gunna get beat back. (all smiles here and happy) Game at this point working as intended................... now the sides have flipped bk its BROKEN again and its always a caldari or amarr that posts these threads ... So argument not dead
I agree with Muad'dibs response. We pushed it to prove that by being risk averse carebears we could push it up to t4. Unforutnaly spending a pvp pilots time on plexing and bearing burnt us all out. And minnis logged on and rabbit and farm plexed it all right back within 2 weeks.
Which is actually what we are doing again this last weekend and this week. We are being risk averse carebears and we already have earned more VP then the Gallente, Caldari and Minnis combined this weekend. Just proving the point that if you dont play eve online and play orbit button u can win the warzone.
|

Milton Middleson
Rifterlings Point Blank Alliance
270
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 15:47:00 -
[153] - Quote
Jesus, Cearain. You act as if finding people plexing is hard. It's not. Right now no one shows up because no one gives a ****. Or, you know, they do show up, and the plexer runs. Or they show up and the plexer doesn't run and there's a fight.
Also, no. |

Rommell Drako
No Moar Tears
56
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 15:49:00 -
[154] - Quote
ALUCARD 1208 wrote:
Nope we dont flip them and higher the tier level to discourage farmers t2 isnt a bad payout ;)
So you proactivly work towards prevent farmers from joining your side? Doesnt really matter since minmatar are always high teir and they can plex the caldari systems. Which still gives them LP and doesnt rely on gallente LP store....
Quote: Wrong again you cant farm past vulnerable and cals dont deplex it so that farmers can earn putting it right bk in again while were not flipping them
Think you might be able to gain LP but no VP in a system that is vulnerable... even if not there is still the fact that caldari could deplex it giving you offensive plex LP, OR that you are preventing them from gaining offensive plex LP, or that gallente just dont want to flip systems because you know. too busy being rabbits.
|

Rommell Drako
No Moar Tears
56
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 15:52:00 -
[155] - Quote
Xolve wrote:Muad 'dib wrote:The systems always been broken and the same amarr that whined BEFORE inferno, whined while inferno and are still whining. If only that put as much effort into the warzone as they did badposting on the forums...
Because spending the entire weekend plexing and being the 25th ranked VP gainer for all of FW is totally the bees knees....
I already want to bash my head on the keyboard for the brain numbing that is plexing and I only did it Friday and sunday. |

Rommell Drako
No Moar Tears
56
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 15:55:00 -
[156] - Quote
ALUCARD 1208 wrote:Muad 'dib wrote:
They pushed it to see if it COULD be done and to get some isk back for the LP they had. Minms reminded at a comfortable lvl and quickly regained control to a point thats it worse than it was before for the amarr.
The systems always been broken and the same amarr that whined BEFORE inferno, whined while inferno and are still whining.
So they proved it could be done then the tide can be turned with co-operation, hardwork + TZ coverage, Feature working as intended
Once again, if we wanted to literally avoid all pvp and do nothing but orbit beacons and only form up for ihub bashes then yes we can push the warzone. But after 1 weekend of being a risk averse rabbit you begin to want to bash your head on the keyboard and quit eve. Because cliking orbit button and watching tv is not playing eve. |

Rommell Drako
No Moar Tears
56
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 15:59:00 -
[157] - Quote
Milton Middleson wrote:Jesus, Cearain. You act as if finding people plexing is hard. It's not. Right now no one shows up because no one gives a ****. Or, you know, they do show up, and the plexer runs. Or they show up and the plexer doesn't run and there's a fight.
Also, no.
WTB What? |

Xolve
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
1372
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 16:01:00 -
[158] - Quote
Cearain wrote:Many people have no interest in having rabbit alts run timers and run from pvp. So we ask ccp to change the mechanics so that is no longer the winning strategy.
CCP isn't going to change anything because you're a whiny babby that isn't even involved in Faction Warfare right now. Any argument you attempt to make is lost, because guess what, you live in exactly the same place you did before, you just contribute nothing to that which you would argue about endlessly.
If you don't like faction warfare in it's current recreation, then quit (which you have) and stop whining about it on the forums (much to the betterment of everyone having to suffer through post after post of your endless drivel) Inappropriate signature removed. Navigator. |

Rommell Drako
No Moar Tears
56
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 16:10:00 -
[159] - Quote
Xolve wrote:Cearain wrote:Many people have no interest in having rabbit alts run timers and run from pvp. So we ask ccp to change the mechanics so that is no longer the winning strategy. CCP isn't going to change anything because you're a whiny babby that isn't even involved in Faction Warfare right now. Any argument you attempt to make is lost, because guess what, you live in exactly the same place you did before, you just contribute nothing to that which you would argue about endlessly. If you don't like faction warfare in it's current recreation, then quit (which you have) and stop whining about it on the forums (much to the betterment of everyone having to suffer through post after post of your endless drivel)
Xolve, I love you, but please look at the numbers and rationalize before entering rage f*** all the things mode.
These are the VP points earned on 4/27/2013
1 Fweddit 9160 2 State Protectorate 6660 3 Federal Defense Union 4540 4 Tribal Liber Force 3940 5 24th Imperial Crusade 1920 6 KOZA Z PIEKLA 1440 7 In Exile. 1280 8 Diesel Corporation 1140 9 Space Devilss 1080 10 SQUIDS. 920
These are the top VP earners: These names are all that are in Fweddit or YOLOCOLO group. Numbers are their rank in overall VP gain for FW.
4 Tom Forager 540 8 Rocko Tsero 500 10 Hesh Poljus 480 13 Pinky Feldman 420 14 Tristan daCuhna 420 19 Siiv Siix 400 24 Rommell Drako 360
So yes we can push the warzone... if we sell our souls to the orbit gods and slash our wrists in the name of Slaanesh. |

Flyinghotpocket
Amarrian Vengeance
118
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 16:17:00 -
[160] - Quote
Cearain wrote:Flyinghotpocket wrote:Cearain wrote:
Sahtogas is heating up recently but it traditionally isn't even one of the top pvp systems on that front. Usuually its just lots of boring dplexing. You and your corp may be fine with that, (and cry bloody murder anytime someone suggests changes that would make the war pvp) but others want to actually fight a war.
idk what war youzone you been fighting in the past few years. sahtogas has always been a hot area, being 1-2 jumps from the front lines and all. and most of the saht locals dont give a **** about d-plexing. From Poetic stanzels blog: Most Active Systems: Kamela (3473) Kourmonen (3121) Huola (2320) Sahtogas (1115) Sosala (1097) Most Active Systems: Amamake (3986) Rens (2823) Siseide (2728) Dal (2379) Vard (1552) There are 6 other systems with over 2 and 3xs the number of kills. In other words it you will get about 1/3 to 1/2 the number of fights in the same time. Those six systems are all within one or 2 jumps from kourm. Sahtogas is 5 jumps from kourm. Again we can characterize these facts however we want but there are the numbers. It may have been bad luck but when I would head out there Sahtogas and its surrounding systems would be pretty dead. Lately, of course, that has changed. That was my point. Lately sahtogas has taken off and next to ammamake it has the most kills in the last 24 hours.
i guess the 'being 1-2 jumps from the front lines and all.' confused you. and maybe the 'past few years' also confused you to.
and even so according to your own words 'Sahtogas is heating up recently but it traditionally isn't even one of the top pvp systems on that front' accord to this post you just made its in the top 5. so idk whats up with that. |

ALUCARD 1208
Spiritus Draconis Sicarius Draconis
174
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 16:17:00 -
[161] - Quote
If you dont like doing the thing fw entails why the fk are you in fw. You say you did it once but got bored you mean u got some isk got fat and lazy and couldnt be arsed to do it again when minnies fought bk (why bother your rich now neway).
Ok so u want sov war for real then I suggest all plexes be removed and we have to do it like null seccers do drop sbus and tcus and fight timers removes farmers all together but is even more boring than orbiting when the blueballs start coming.
GÖÑ HIGH FIVES GÖÑ-á |

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
910
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 16:32:00 -
[162] - Quote
Xolve wrote:Cearain wrote:Many people have no interest in having rabbit alts run timers and run from pvp. So we ask ccp to change the mechanics so that is no longer the winning strategy. CCP isn't going to change anything because you're a whiny babby that isn't even involved in Faction Warfare right now. Any argument you attempt to make is lost, because guess what, you live in exactly the same place you did before, you just contribute nothing to that which you would argue about endlessly. If you don't like faction warfare in it's current recreation, then quit (which you have) and stop whining about it on the forums (much to the betterment of everyone having to suffer through post after post of your endless drivel)
Xolve
Someone already beat you to the argument "if you don't like fw, then quit" and the other argument "yer not even in fw, so your view doesn't count"
But you are the first in this thread to make another of the standard arguments against making fw pvp.
7) "If you don't like fw then ....Stop posting on the forums that you don't like mechanics."
This is also a standard argument against making faction war sov a pvp game. Of course it makes no logical sense. But such illogical posts become the norm for people trying to defend the current rabbit plexing system. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Rommell Drako
No Moar Tears
56
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 16:38:00 -
[163] - Quote
Flyinghotpocket wrote:
Most Active Systems: Kamela (3473) Kourmonen (3121) Huola (2320) Sahtogas (1115) Sosala (1097)
Most Active Systems: Amamake (3986) Rens (2823) Siseide (2728) Dal (2379) Vard (1552)
i guess the 'being 1-2 jumps from the front lines and all.' confused you. and maybe the 'past few years' also confused you to.
and even so according to your own words 'Sahtogas is heating up recently but it traditionally isn't even one of the top pvp systems on that front' accord to this post you just made its in the top 5. so idk whats up with that.
LOL look at the numbers.... saht (1115). the lowest on the other list is Vard (1552). thus saying its still a slow system. This info doesnt have dates on it so i dont know wtf it is but you can still tell saht is a slow system. |

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
910
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 16:46:00 -
[164] - Quote
Milton Middleson wrote:Jesus, Cearain. You act as if finding people plexing is hard. It's not. Right now no one shows up because no one gives a ****. Or, you know, they do show up, and the plexer runs. Or they show up and the plexer doesn't run and there's a fight.
Also, no.
You are right no one shows up because they don't give a ****. I agree. But the reason they don't give a **** is because the game is horribly broken. People try to win games that are fun and challenging. Not games that are broken and stupid. Right now FW sov is broken and stupid so few care to even try to win it.
I do all my pvp pretty much exlclusively in or at plexes. On average I would say I need to go about 5 systems to find someone running a plex. Often I will warp to plexes outside dscan range to find they are empty.
So if a pvper had a tool to allow him to go directly to where the plexes were being run he would be at least 5xs as efficient. After rabbits got repeatedly chased out of plexes and had that time wasted do to a rollback many if not all would leave to find some other pve activity. The rabbits would leave and the plexes would be taken by pvpers. FW sov would be a pvp mechanic.
So letting pvpers directly know where plexes are being capped will make them much more efficient and it will make the rabbits several times less efficient. Like I said its pretty straight forward.
But I guess your view is that no one will react to this intel right? I want to get this straight because these threads almost always end up with people arguing contradictions. Namely, some will say too many will react to the intel and it will be blobs! Others like you say no one will react to the intel. I think enough will react to the intel so rabbit plexing will end. But the war zone is too large (and there are too many different sized plexes) for a single or even 5 or 6 blobs to control the whole warzone.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

ALUCARD 1208
Spiritus Draconis Sicarius Draconis
174
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 17:12:00 -
[165] - Quote
Quote: some will say too many will react to the intel and it will be blobs! Others like you say no one will react to the intel. I think enough will react to the intel so rabbit plexing will end. But the war zone is too large (and there are too many different sized plexes) for a single or even 5 or 6 blobs to control the whole warzone.
ALL of the above is the answer GÖÑ HIGH FIVES GÖÑ-á |

Almity
In Exile. Imperial Outlaws.
57
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 17:18:00 -
[166] - Quote
Still looking for a Euro corp to join us. Five to six competent pilots is enough to keep the Russians away. Plenty of pvp to be had against a few dedicated pilots and swarms of horrible pilots. |

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
910
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 17:21:00 -
[167] - Quote
ALUCARD 1208 wrote:Quote: some will say too many will react to the intel and it will be blobs! Others like you say no one will react to the intel. I think enough will react to the intel so rabbit plexing will end. But the war zone is too large (and there are too many different sized plexes) for a single or even 5 or 6 blobs to control the whole warzone. ALL of the above is the answer
Thanks alucard. I think this thread now has all the standard bad arguments to preserve the current rabbit plexing game called fw sov.
8) if we let the pvpers know where people are plexing no one will respond!
and in the very same post
9) If we let pvpers know where people are plexing too many will respond!
I think those were the last of the standard arguments in favor of keeping the current carebear race.
Now I think we can expect those who like the current hide and seek plexing to just continue with comments like "notifications are stupid" or "cearain shouldn't post so much" Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Muad 'dib
The Imperial Fedaykin Amarrian Commandos
899
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 18:02:00 -
[168] - Quote
Xolve wrote:Muad 'dib wrote:The systems always been broken and the same amarr that whined BEFORE inferno, whined while inferno and are still whining. If only that put as much effort into the warzone as they did badposting on the forums...
how shamed we feel to try and fix somthing we love.
lets not bother posting anything about eve ever and just hope they guess right (cus that worked so great in the past).
im whining, you are the one bad posting irrelevant one liners
besides real answer: i cant play eve at work so i post to help the game i love when i get home to play it.
fw was plenty of fun before inferno, instead of being enhanced with new features and mechanics, its got worse - but thats okay because the easymode farm alts are happy. Cosmic signature detected. . . . http://img299.imageshack.us/img299/4375/mynewsig2.jpg CCP Hilmar CEO > "why am i sweating, why is the game doing this to me"
|

Akiko Mayaki
State Protectorate Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 18:02:00 -
[169] - Quote
Cearain wrote:ALUCARD 1208 wrote:Quote: some will say too many will react to the intel and it will be blobs! Others like you say no one will react to the intel. I think enough will react to the intel so rabbit plexing will end. But the war zone is too large (and there are too many different sized plexes) for a single or even 5 or 6 blobs to control the whole warzone. ALL of the above is the answer Thanks alucard. I think this thread now has all the standard bad arguments to preserve the current rabbit plexing game called fw sov. 8) if we let the pvpers know where people are plexing no one will respond! and in the very same post 9) If we let pvpers know where people are plexing too many will respond! I think those were the last of the standard arguments in favor of keeping the current carebear race. Now I think we can expect those who like the current hide and seek plexing to just continue with comments like "notifications are stupid" or "cearain shouldn't post so much"
I've read you say the same thing over and over, from thread to thread for literally months. No one here is saying FW is perfect, or that we shouldn't talk about changes.
This notification idea however, is one of the worst ideas I've ever heard.
I don't chase farmers because they tend to be people that don't want to fight, its not because I cant find them or they 'give me the slip' and go into some back system. Peoples time is limited, the 'true pvpers' you care so much about are going to move on the instant a farmer shows what he is. Sure I could chase him, warp back and forth, maybe he'll slip up, but on average my time is better spent moving on. Again, what do I care if a stabbed condor is plexing 13 jumps away? Hes still going to be 30km off the warp in, stabbed, and in warp anyway by the time I land, nothing you do is going to change that.
Which brings me to my second point, why does anyone with a functioning brain want to rely on a notification system? The system doesnt know **** about my militias priorities, again, wtf do I care if some as***e is plexing in Nagamen in a cloaky rifter? Use your FW tab and see which systems are going up/down whatever, you'll notice if you actually care about those systems. Combined with intel channels and functioning intra militia relations, you will quickly be able to control your WZ. Quite frankly I would have to completely ignore you notification system if it was implemented, I'm sure others feel the same.
Your suggestions, to me, really highlight the fact that you do not operate within a militia. People hold on to the systems they decide to hold onto and live in. Systems where farming occurs that is detrimental to our militia, are quickly targeted and farmers dispersed. "Hide and Seek" plexing has not been the recent character of the relevant (to sov) aspects of FW. That you would think this in light of the past 5-6 months that has seen the advent of massive system capture efforts, home system versus home system, is quite bewildering.
There are farmers in Hallanen, but not in Nennamalia. Learn to live in or near systems you dont want farmed. A notification system is not going to grant you the ability to sail the seven seas slaying every farmer you see on some epic roam of the entirety of the FW WZ.
|

Muad 'dib
The Imperial Fedaykin Amarrian Commandos
899
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 18:08:00 -
[170] - Quote
ALUCARD 1208 wrote:Muad 'dib wrote:
They pushed it to see if it COULD be done and to get some isk back for the LP they had. Minms reminded at a comfortable lvl and quickly regained control to a point thats it worse than it was before for the amarr.
The systems always been broken and the same amarr that whined BEFORE inferno, whined while inferno and are still whining.
So they proved it could be done then the tide can be turned with co-operation, hardwork + TZ coverage, Feature working as intended
yes with the man power it can, for the sake of a test. yes its possible, but what are you going to do, convince everyone in fw to change a side every few months to make it even? theres only so many that care in the first place and they tend ot stick to their sides.
you cant sustain the man power because of: certian fw factions have better locations and adjacent systems certain fw factions have more or less systems FW prices dispite a full year basicly on one side, the other is still not close to being as profitable new players are swayed by ease: locking them out of half the map or more makes joining the losing side stupid new players looking to farm will only pick the easiest side if a side overcomes the odds and swings things their way, they are all burned out and theres no replacements
it would take nothing more at this point to give a super duper awesome must-have ship or module in the losing side only to get the farmers to change - but they wont change they will make another alt and do it while theres money in it. Cosmic signature detected. . . . http://img299.imageshack.us/img299/4375/mynewsig2.jpg CCP Hilmar CEO > "why am i sweating, why is the game doing this to me"
|

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
910
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 19:00:00 -
[171] - Quote
Akiko Mayaki wrote: This notification idea however, is one of the worst ideas I've ever heard.
I don't chase farmers because they tend to be people that don't want to fight, its not because I cant find them or they 'give me the slip' and go into some back system. Peoples time is limited, the 'true pvpers' you care so much about are going to move on the instant a farmer shows what he is. Sure I could chase him, warp back and forth, maybe he'll slip up, but on average my time is better spent moving on. Again, what do I care if a stabbed condor is plexing 13 jumps away? Hes still going to be 30km off the warp in, stabbed, and in warp anyway by the time I land, nothing you do is going to change that.
OK so you are taking the position that the notifications will be ignored. Keep in mind that there are plenty of people who post that far from being ignored they will be watched closely not only by miltia but by neutrals with an alt in fw.
Moreover I know for a fact that I would love to know everyone plexing within 3 jumps of me. I love plex pvp. I am not the only one either. There are plenty of people who will respond to these notifications. Maybe you won't but plenty of people will.
Rabbits stick around because they can continue to plex without anyone coming to fight them. There is a reason they prefer systems with few in local. Very few will even know they are there. When you combine notifications with timer rollbacks you have a system where 5 or 6 pvp pilots spread out can easilly make sure that every plex is fought over.
Akiko Mayaki wrote: Which brings me to my second point, why does anyone with a functioning brain want to rely on a notification system? The system doesnt know **** about my militias priorities, again, wtf do I care if some as***e is plexing in Nagamen in a cloaky rifter? Use your FW tab and see which systems are going up/down whatever, you'll notice if you actually care about those systems. Combined with intel channels and functioning intra militia relations, you will quickly be able to control your WZ. Quite frankly I would have to completely ignore you notification system if it was implemented, I'm sure others feel the same.
The idea behind fw sov war is that we are trying to win space for our faction. I know very few people care about it now. But that is largely because they see how silly it is to try to resist the rabbit hordes. If the fw sov game turned into a small gang pvp heavan, that would change. It would be something to brag about winning. Now its not.
So now in its broken state players either move out of the warzone completely, or they just pretty much care about 1 or 2 systems that they base out of. No one cares about the other 90% of the war zone because we don't have the tools to deal with rabbit plexers.
The notification system does not need to know your personal priorities. But for those who want to fight for sov for their militia it would be a great tool. Maybe you are not interested in the sov war and just want to hold one system to dock your ships. Thats fine you can still do that. But I can guarantee you that there are plenty of fw pvpers who love plex fighting and would love to know where they need to go to fight for the complexes. What supports this claim?
Consider that about 35% of the pvp in plexes involves players who are not even in the militia. They can't make the timer run. They can't get lp. They are just there for the high quality pvp plex mechanics can offer. When you think about that, you should realize that there are plenty of people who would love to fight over plexes thoughout the warzone. Not just be forced to one or two systems where the home team has all their booster alts and blobs.
Akiko Mayaki wrote: Your suggestions, to me, really highlight the fact that you do not operate within a militia. People hold on to the systems they decide to hold onto and live in. Systems where farming occurs that is detrimental to our militia, are quickly targeted and farmers dispersed. "Hide and Seek" plexing has not been the recent character of the relevant (to sov) aspects of FW. That you would think this in light of the past 5-6 months that has seen the advent of massive system capture efforts, home system versus home system, is quite bewildering.
There are farmers in Hallanen, but not in Nennamalia. Learn to live in or near systems you dont want farmed. A notification system is not going to grant you the ability to sail the seven seas slaying every farmer you see on some epic roam of the entirety of the FW WZ.
I spent a few years in the miltia including being in the militia under the current mechanics. Moreover since leaving 95% of my eve time involves fighting in plexes. (the other 5% trade and moving ships) I know very well how the plex war works. Hide and seek plexing decides sov in 90% of the warzone. And the pvpers in fw don't have the tools to do anything about the hordes of rabbits.
There are rabbits in all the systems. Typically the rabbits in home systems are alts that just defensive plex when the enemy leaves.
CCP has already agreed a notification system and timer rollbacks are a good idea we just need to push them to get it done. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
578
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 20:01:00 -
[172] - Quote
Rommell Drako wrote:Before I read and catch up on what was posted since my last post I wanted to share some numbers with you.
System control numbers for each warzone
Amarr/Minmatar Vulnerable: 0 Above 90%: 1 80-90%: 2 70-80%: 2 60-70%: 3 50-60%: 7
Caldari/Gallente Vulnerable: 19 90%: 10 80-90%: 8 70-80%: 4 60-70%: 2 50-60%: 9
How are there 19 systems that are vulnerable? Why has Gallente not flipped them? (all of the vulnerable systems are caldari owned, this is the definition of Minmatar plexing alts pushing their warzone).
This is the definition of broken. No one in the gallente wants to fight the warzone. They are either also plexing, leaving the system in caldari hands so they can continue to offensive plex it (more LP), or dont understand the flip mechanics.
Anyway you look at it you have to realize this is broken. EVE FARMVILLE ONLINE is what faction warfare is and if you cant tell that by the numbers then you might not be cut out for spreadsheets online.
These numbers are also the reason why I never care for the opinions from anyone on that side of the warzone. These numbers disgust me.
I think its a general consensus that we are happy at tier 2 and that leaving systems vulnerable actually starves minmatar farmers of LP. Caldari of course flip systems the second they go vulnerable which gives the farmers immediate grounds to work on. We then flip a couple of systems back to retain the balance as caldari already have more than enough systems to hit tier 2 but dont for one reason or another.
That is the shape of the gallente war-zone. |

Estella Osoka
Deep Void Merc Syndicate Villore Accords
94
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 20:11:00 -
[173] - Quote
I'm no genius, but I do recall that Devs and GMs tend to respond in the General Discussion and Featues & Ideas Discussion boards more ofen than the Warfare & Tactics forum. Just saying.... |

Maximus Hashur
Vanus Technical Solutions Corp Covert Intervention
55
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 20:12:00 -
[174] - Quote
The suggestion that has been made by multiple people to reset the timer when a farmer warps out would greatly change things. Sure there would still be some farmers making LP when no one challenges them, but they would be greatly disrupted by WTs and nuetrals coming in to lite them up.
If every time a farmer got chased out of a medium, the timer reset to 20 or 25 (whatever it is) then you would quickly see a reduction in carebears and an increase in those of use that take almost every fight.
I only warp out when the incoming ship/force is obviously to strong for me and is a loss waiting to happen. IE a rupture warping into the medium im trying to take in my cormorant. Will i lose the progress i made yes. Did the defender do his job yes.
If i cant hold it, i don't deserve the LP Looked up...saw this F***ING clown dropping like a rock.-á Woke up in Vylade wondering what just happened!!! |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
578
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 20:15:00 -
[175] - Quote
Cearain wrote:I do all my pvp pretty much exlclusively in or at plexes. On average I would say I need to go about 5 systems to find someone running a plex. Often I will warp to plexes outside dscan range to find they are empty.
Hardly seems that rabbit plexing is out of control if there are 5 empty systems in a row.
Also, you are terrible at finding pvp. |

Xolve
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
1374
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 20:20:00 -
[176] - Quote
Muad 'dib wrote:EDIT: also Xolve, how are you finding FW after this many months? oh wait never mind you left, question answered :P
It's a fun distraction, but the whole thing seems to 'entry level' to actually enjoy with High Skill points, removing larger scaled plexes (or making them really rare) was literally the bane of people who could fly things bigger than Frigates and Destroyers. I never cared about the warzone, loyalty points, farming or VP; I cared about shooting things, Fweddit devolved into a massive pve corp, so I left.
Because at it's core, that is what FW is, PVE. There's nothing wrong about posting about things you want fixed or are passionate about, it's just funny to me that the same people, post the same arguments, time and time again- if that effort was spent elsewhere they might see the fruits of their labor actually put to use, instead of smattering thread after thread with a mix of good and bad ideas that will never see the attention of the Developers.
There are people recently elected onto the CSM that actually care about FW, why band together with a few of your liked minded fellows and put something together to present to that CSM member, that given chance (Fozzie isn't done with FW) could present it at a round table/skype call/whatever.
Inappropriate signature removed. Navigator. |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
578
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 20:31:00 -
[177] - Quote
Maximus Hashur wrote:The suggestion that has been made by multiple people to reset the timer when a farmer warps out would greatly change things. Sure there would still be some farmers making LP when no one challenges them, but they would be greatly disrupted by WTs and nuetrals coming in to lite them up.
If every time a farmer got chased out of a medium, the timer reset to 20 or 25 (whatever it is) then you would quickly see a reduction in carebears and an increase in those of us that take almost every fight.
I only warp out when the incoming ship/force is obviously too strong for me and is a loss waiting to happen. IE a rupture warping into the medium im trying to take in my cormorant. Will i lose the progress i made - yes. Did the defender do his job - yes.
If i cant hold control of the plex in one unbroken (no warpout) occupation of the site, i don't deserve the LP.
Come to think of it, add cloaking to that list also. No cloaking or the timer resets. These two measures combined would cripple plex farming and encourage only those that fight to try to take the plexes.
I think thats too harsh. It removes the incentive to ship / form up to fight the people who kicked you from the plex if on your return the timer is back to scratch. That is why timers counting backwards is a good idea. Perhaps if the enemy stay in the plex the timer counts back twice as fast until it reaches its start point.
That would retain some incentive to come back for a fight, and for the other side, to wait for a fight. |

ALUCARD 1208
Spiritus Draconis Sicarius Draconis
175
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 20:49:00 -
[178] - Quote
cearain wrote: No one cares about the other 90% of the war zone because we don't have the tools to deal with rabbit plexers.
Were do you get this notion from that people who dont care for backwater systems that see no action and serve no purpose to us suddendly become desirable just because we know someone plexing there. We already know people are plexing backwaters and still dont give a fk about them anyone. They provide no military or strategic advantage to us like a home system does
GÖÑ HIGH FIVES GÖÑ-á |

Muad 'dib
The Imperial Fedaykin Amarrian Commandos
900
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 21:03:00 -
[179] - Quote
you told me im bad for caring and look at you, you do actually care you just like to hide it by being a big meany! Cosmic signature detected. . . . http://img299.imageshack.us/img299/4375/mynewsig2.jpg CCP Hilmar CEO > "why am i sweating, why is the game doing this to me"
|

Taoist Dragon
Bastion of Mad Behaviour Caldari State Capturing
407
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 21:21:00 -
[180] - Quote
Why do people still bleat on about making FW sov a pvp centric mechanism...
GET A GRIP PEOPLE!! PVP only sov mean structure bashing and superblobs. Why do you think null is so f'ked atm. And you want FW to follow THAT example?
I'll put it in simple terms so the slow among you can understand.
There are not enough players spread out across the TZ's to make a reliable pvp only sov mechanic.
Plain and simple, anyone with half a brain can see this.
The suggestions of timer rollbacks and reducing the LP payout bonuses are probably the most sensible sugestions on these type of threads.
My personal bugbear is the diagonal plexing. I believe that you should get the LP for the factions warzone you are fighting in at their teir lvl. (eg. minnie alt plex's a caldari system they should get gallente lp at gallente teir not minnie at whatever boosted teir they are at.)
And if anyone believes that PVP cannot have an effect sov then you obviously haven't been part of a home system offensive. The fact that 'rabbit' plexer exsist show fundementally that there isn't the playerbase to support a full pvp sov.
I think that the whine cycle has just repeated itself again! That is the Way, the Tao.
Balance is everything. |

Andre Vauban
Quantum Cats Syndicate Samurai Pizza Cats
98
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 21:28:00 -
[181] - Quote
Xolve wrote: It's a fun distraction, but the whole thing seems to 'entry level' to actually enjoy with High Skill points, removing larger scaled plexes (or making them really rare) was literally the bane of people who could fly things bigger than Frigates and Destroyers. I never cared about the warzone, loyalty points, farming or VP; I cared about shooting things, Fweddit devolved into a massive pve corp, so I left.
It has nothing to do with skillpoints and everything to due with available playtime and peoples definition of fun. I have 2 moros/ archon pilots and I'm working on the third. Two of my combat toons could easily fly supers if I choose to spend the isk on the fighter bomber/titan skillbooks and the ship. My problem is that I play Eve at exactly the same time everyday which is after the kids go to bed and after a little quality time with my wife. Given that, I still play between 2-4 hours a day. That leaves me in the situation where there isn't always something going on at the only time I can play Eve. If there is something going on, its fun to jump into a faction BS, T3, or a capital. If there isn't anything going on, I also have fun flying a destroyer or frigate. I have no patience to sit on a titan or wait in station docked up for something to happen, as I see that as wasting my limited playtime and it is just as fun to fight outnumbered in a FW plex in a frig/destroyer.
I'd love to do more of the big epic fights, but the more I understand that playstyle, the more I realize that you have to sacrifice the small gang in order to get it which is why I'm still in FW. If you want to play the game with the big boys, you need to be tethered to jabber 24x7 and ready to log in and deploy in a few minutes.
. |

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
910
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 21:46:00 -
[182] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:Cearain wrote:I do all my pvp pretty much exlclusively in or at plexes. On average I would say I need to go about 5 systems to find someone running a plex. Often I will warp to plexes outside dscan range to find they are empty. Hardly seems that rabbit plexing is out of control if there are 5 empty systems in a row. Also, you are terrible at finding pvp.
They aren't being plexed for the 30 seconds to a minute that I go through there. But you can't draw any large conclusions from that. Even the busy systems typically do not have any plexes active at any given time. Thats why the lack of this information means pvpers have to waste allot of time defending their space.
As far as finding pvp. I get about 100-150 solo pvp kills a month. It could be better but Thats not too bad for the time I spend online.
Cearain wrote:
The idea behind fw sov war is that we are trying to win space for our faction.
Not really dude, maybe for a washed up roleplayer such as yourself.
The actual idea behind the current sov was is as a conflict driver and a mechanic for people to pay for their PvP. If there is a problem with the current mechanics, it is that it is now clearly possible for one side to failscade for an extended period of time. Some intricate suggestions about diminishing VP returns inverse to the tier reward for LP for winning sound interesting but might have other consequences like amarr taking a minmatar home system in a few hours of plexing because of their VP bonus in their losing state.
I know this is far too complicated for you too understand. If you want end game sov-war move to dull sec and pollute CAOD with your complete stupidity.[/quote]
You seem a bit upset that you can't formulate an actual problem with giving pvpers notice when their complexes are being attacked. So in order to protect your rabbit plexers you just call me stupid. Nice.
The conflict driver in faction war is having both sides try to take sov in the same systems.
As far as tweaking vp amounts, its funny you say that is beyond me. I suggested that giving lp for defensive plexing might unbalance the system too much and instead they should tweak the vp amounts if one side was having trouble hitting higher tiers. Its ok youll catch up.
And threads like this one will continue spring up as long as fw sov remains a game of who can get the most rabbits on their side. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Deen Wispa
Justified Chaos
507
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 21:53:00 -
[183] - Quote
Andre Vauban wrote:Xolve wrote: It's a fun distraction, but the whole thing seems to 'entry level' to actually enjoy with High Skill points, removing larger scaled plexes (or making them really rare) was literally the bane of people who could fly things bigger than Frigates and Destroyers. I never cared about the warzone, loyalty points, farming or VP; I cared about shooting things, Fweddit devolved into a massive pve corp, so I left.
It has nothing to do with skillpoints and everything to due with available playtime and peoples definition of fun. I have 2 moros/ archon pilots and I'm working on the third. Two of my combat toons could easily fly supers if I choose to spend the isk on the fighter bomber/titan skillbooks and the ship. My problem is that I play Eve at exactly the same time everyday which is after the kids go to bed and after a little quality time with my wife. Given that, I still play between 2-4 hours a day. That leaves me in the situation where there isn't always something going on at the only time I can play Eve. If there is something going on, its fun to jump into a faction BS, T3, or a capital. If there isn't anything going on, I also have fun flying a destroyer or frigate. I have no patience to sit on a titan or wait in station docked up for something to happen, as I see that as wasting my limited playtime and it is just as fun to fight outnumbered in a FW plex in a frig/destroyer. I'd love to do more of the big epic fights, but the more I understand that playstyle, the more I realize that you have to sacrifice the small gang in order to get it which is why I'm still in FW. If you want to play the game with the big boys, you need to be tethered to jabber 24x7 and ready to log in and deploy in a few minutes.
I think Xolve is making the issue a bit too black and white and pitting Nullsec shiney fleets vs FW cheap fleets.
Andre makes a good point about how FW is conducive to people like him and I who have limited playtimes and don't have the patience to sit on a Titan. I used to play alot, but nowadays I can barely play twice a week due to RL priorities.
But Xolve also makes a good point about how FW has denigrated into mostly destroyers and below. And it has...for the most part. I just commented yesterday on comms how I have yet to do a proteus fleet in lord knows how long despite the fact that many of the skilled players in our corp can fly a proteus or T2 HAC easily. Sadly, the FW mechanics don't encourage us to bring out BCs and higher  High Five. Yeah! C'est La Eve . |

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
910
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 22:01:00 -
[184] - Quote
Xolve wrote:Muad 'dib wrote:EDIT: also Xolve, how are you finding FW after this many months? oh wait never mind you left, question answered :P It's a fun distraction, but the whole thing seems to 'entry level' to actually enjoy with High Skill points, removing larger scaled plexes (or making them really rare) was literally the bane of people who could fly things bigger than Frigates and Destroyers. I never cared about the warzone, loyalty points, farming or VP; I cared about shooting things, Fweddit devolved into a massive pve corp, so I left. Because at it's core, that is what FW is, PVE. There's nothing wrong about posting about things you want fixed or are passionate about, it's just funny to me that the same people, post the same arguments, time and time again- if that effort was spent elsewhere they might see the fruits of their labor actually put to use, instead of smattering thread after thread with a mix of good and bad ideas that will never see the attention of the Developers. There are people recently elected onto the CSM that actually care about FW, why band together with a few of your liked minded fellows and put something together to present to that CSM member, that given chance (Fozzie isn't done with FW) could present it at a round table/skype call/whatever.
I don't know that fweddit became a pve corp. But other than that, there is allot of truth in what you wrote.
FW sov is a pve game. It always was and that is why the same proposals keep coming up again and again.
There should be more larger plexes so people can occassionally trot out the BS fleet with cap support.
We had a csm who got behind some of the ideas and made fw better.(at least the plex npcs are no longer standing in the way of pvp) But Alas he got sidetracked with tweaking lp amounts and how the lp was paid instead of getting the mechanics to promote pvp.
Also I am not so sure ccp isn't aware of any of these threads. Part of the problem is allot of people are fine with fw sov remaining a pve game. I think you can see that in this thread. So its hard to get a consensus.
CCP has already indicated they would like to have notifications and timer rollbacks. Its just a matter of getting the community to stop quibbling and push them to do it sooner rather than later.
Unfortunately these threads often end up in irrelevant name calling instead of any sort of constructive analysis of proposals. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Cosmo Raata
T-Cells Moar Tears
50
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 23:58:00 -
[185] - Quote
I'm still baffled by the defense of FW.
It doesn't encourage pvp, people simply pvp in spite of it.
It doesn't encourage teamwork, people simply gravitate toward social activities.
It doesn't reward risk, people can avoid risk as much as they want.
Does it work as it? Sure, but being satisfied with it is like enjoying a stale sandwich without meat or condiments. Yeah, its edible, but why would you want to eat it or at least complain about what you got that is somehow called a sandwich. |

Xolve
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
1374
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 00:00:00 -
[186] - Quote
Deen Wispa wrote:But Xolve also makes a good point about how FW has denigrated into mostly destroyers and below. And it has...for the most part. I just commented yesterday on comms how I have yet to do a proteus fleet in lord knows how long despite the fact that many of the skilled players in our corp can fly a proteus or T2 HAC easily. Sadly, the FW mechanics don't encourage us to bring out BCs and higher 
I mentioned a few things to someone who supposedly had Fozzies ear (and I've talked to him elsewhere) but essentially:
-Give FW Plexes with MINIMUM ship types to capture (BC+, T2 Cruiser+) etc. to give players in the higher SP echelons something to do, many people including those in NullSec find flying Frigates/Dessies to be a daunting task when your clone upgrade costs 40m+ (I'm not complaining about isk, just re-voicing legitimate concerns). Pre-Inferno Larges and the smaller Installations/Facilities were actually fun because you could do things like Tech III fleets, Use T2 ships, and what not; and they are just simply too few and far between these days
-Require plexes to have the largest allowable ship present to start the countdown. Seriously.
-Moving the warzone from instant LP to a 'Campaign' or phase mode to capture X amount of systems and make payouts afterwards based on VP/Participation, this would instantly remove the bot farmers, reward faction loyalty, and actually have create cause for people to stay up longer than we care to talk about and make warzone pushes. After each 'phase', reset the warzone.
It sounds a little silly at first, but it's a more competitive approach to things, and would allow for secondary payouts/contests/metrics for secondary payouts/awards/medals. It certainly seems more fun on paper than orbit this button in this plex, then that button, and this one, then come back in 45 minutes after repeating the same in this system next door until our heads explode and/or we kill ourselves from repetitious boredom/insanity. Inappropriate signature removed. Navigator. |

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
914
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 00:36:00 -
[187] - Quote
Xolve wrote:Deen Wispa wrote:But Xolve also makes a good point about how FW has denigrated into mostly destroyers and below. And it has...for the most part. I just commented yesterday on comms how I have yet to do a proteus fleet in lord knows how long despite the fact that many of the skilled players in our corp can fly a proteus or T2 HAC easily. Sadly, the FW mechanics don't encourage us to bring out BCs and higher  I mentioned a few things to someone who supposedly had Fozzies ear (and I've talked to him elsewhere) but essentially: -Give FW Plexes with MINIMUM ship types to capture (BC+, T2 Cruiser+) etc. to give players in the higher SP echelons something to do, many people including those in NullSec find flying Frigates/Dessies to be a daunting task when your clone upgrade costs 40m+ (I'm not complaining about isk, just re-voicing legitimate concerns). Pre-Inferno Larges and the smaller Installations/Facilities were actually fun because you could do things like Tech III fleets, Use T2 ships, and what not; and they are just simply too few and far between these days -Require plexes to have the largest allowable ship present to start the countdown. Seriously..
Chatgris suggested this. Couple of points:
The cost of a clone is not so daunting in low sec with no bubbles.
But in low sec we do tend to lose allot of ships compared to null sec. So its really the cost of the ship/mods that is the bigger issue. The reason I don't fly bigger ships is due to insta lock gate camps. They catch everything but I don't mind losing a frigate or dessie. But when I am throwing away 100ish mill for a non fight its no fun.
Xolve wrote: -Moving the warzone from instant LP to a 'Campaign' or phase mode to capture X amount of systems and make payouts afterwards based on VP/Participation, this would instantly remove the bot farmers, reward faction loyalty, and actually have create cause for people to stay up longer than we care to talk about and make warzone pushes. After each 'phase', reset the warzone.
It sounds a little silly at first, but it's a more competitive approach to things, and would allow for secondary payouts/contests/metrics for secondary payouts/awards/medals. It certainly seems more fun on paper than orbit this button in this plex, then that button, and this one, then come back in 45 minutes after repeating the same in this system next door until our heads explode and/or we kill ourselves from repetitious boredom/insanity.
I am not sure what you mean here. But the cashout system was sort of like that. I liked the cashout system, but I think I am the only one who liked it. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Cosmo Raata
T-Cells Moar Tears
51
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 00:49:00 -
[188] - Quote
Xolve wrote:Deen Wispa wrote:But Xolve also makes a good point about how FW has denigrated into mostly destroyers and below. And it has...for the most part. I just commented yesterday on comms how I have yet to do a proteus fleet in lord knows how long despite the fact that many of the skilled players in our corp can fly a proteus or T2 HAC easily. Sadly, the FW mechanics don't encourage us to bring out BCs and higher  I mentioned a few things to someone who supposedly had Fozzies ear (and I've talked to him elsewhere) but essentially: -Give FW Plexes with MINIMUM ship types to capture (BC+, T2 Cruiser+) etc. to give players in the higher SP echelons something to do, many people including those in NullSec find flying Frigates/Dessies to be a daunting task when your clone upgrade costs 40m+ (I'm not complaining about isk, just re-voicing legitimate concerns). Pre-Inferno Larges and the smaller Installations/Facilities were actually fun because you could do things like Tech III fleets, Use T2 ships, and what not; and they are just simply too few and far between these days -Require plexes to have the largest allowable ship present to start the countdown. Seriously. -Moving the warzone from instant LP to a 'Campaign' or phase mode to capture X amount of systems and make payouts afterwards based on VP/Participation, this would instantly remove the bot farmers, reward faction loyalty, and actually have create cause for people to stay up longer than we care to talk about and make warzone pushes. After each 'phase', reset the warzone. It sounds a little silly at first, but it's a more competitive approach to things, and would allow for secondary payouts/contests/metrics for secondary payouts/awards/medals. It certainly seems more fun on paper than orbit this button in this plex, then that button, and this one, then come back in 45 minutes after repeating the same in this system next door until our heads explode and/or we kill ourselves from repetitious boredom/insanity.
See, I knew you had some ideas to make it better in ya. Never was arguing that my ideas were awesome, just that you don't need to put FW under the microscope to realize its execution is below average. |

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
914
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 00:49:00 -
[189] - Quote
Taoist Dragon wrote:. The fact that 'rabbit' plexer exsist show fundementally that there isn't the playerbase to support a full pvp sov.
There are 19,000 characters in faction war. There are only 170 systems. Pvpers don't need more players they need better tools. 7-10 active pvpers online could prevent all the rabbits in a warzone if they had the right intel tools and rollbacks.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Taoist Dragon
Bastion of Mad Behaviour Caldari State Capturing
408
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 00:54:00 -
[190] - Quote
Cosmo Raata wrote:I'm still baffled by the defense of FW.
It doesn't encourage pvp, people simply pvp in spite of it.
It doesn't encourage teamwork, people simply gravitate toward social activities.
It doesn't reward risk, people can avoid risk as much as they want.
Does it work as it? Sure, but being satisfied with it is like enjoying a stale sandwich without meat or condiments. Yeah, its edible, but why would you want to eat it or at least complain about what you got that is somehow called a sandwich.
FW is differnet from when it was purely for fun (before inferno LP for plex system). The system has changed. It sounds like the system has changed to something that doesn't follow what you want it to be. Maybe you need to find somewhere else to be flying.
TBH all the above applies to 90% of eve.
Only players can encourage pvp. even through there are large number of eve players there are not enough to have pvp only mechanics from any one area. Having a requirement to kill other players for set rewards etc just can't work with such a low population. PVP will ALWAYS be on the fringe of pve or a direct conflict of players. The game just 'allows' it to happen pretty much anywhere but cannot actively encourage it.
Encouraging teamwork doesn't work as all it does is feed the blob which pretty much everyone is against... vOv
The risk/reward profile is backwards in Eve and has been for a number of years. The rewards for low risk play are just too great. This is a major area that needs to be address IMO. But you will never be able to 'force' peopl to look for pvp. See my above comment. And risk avoidance is ingrained in the mind of most 'normal' people, why expect it to be different in EVE? That is the Way, the Tao.
Balance is everything. |

Cosmo Raata
T-Cells Moar Tears
52
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 01:15:00 -
[191] - Quote
Taoist Dragon wrote:Cosmo Raata wrote:I'm still baffled by the defense of FW.
It doesn't encourage pvp, people simply pvp in spite of it.
It doesn't encourage teamwork, people simply gravitate toward social activities.
It doesn't reward risk, people can avoid risk as much as they want.
Does it work as it? Sure, but being satisfied with it is like enjoying a stale sandwich without meat or condiments. Yeah, its edible, but why would you want to eat it or at least complain about what you got that is somehow called a sandwich. FW is differnet from when it was purely for fun (before inferno LP for plex system). The system has changed. It sounds like the system has changed to something that doesn't follow what you want it to be. Maybe you need to find somewhere else to be flying. TBH all the above applies to 90% of eve. Only players can encourage pvp. even through there are large number of eve players there are not enough to have pvp only mechanics from any one area. Having a requirement to kill other players for set rewards etc just can't work with such a low population. PVP will ALWAYS be on the fringe of pve or a direct conflict of players. The game just 'allows' it to happen pretty much anywhere but cannot actively encourage it. Encouraging teamwork doesn't work as all it does is feed the blob which pretty much everyone is against... vOv The risk/reward profile is backwards in Eve and has been for a number of years. The rewards for low risk play are just too great. This is a major area that needs to be address IMO. But you will never be able to 'force' peopl to look for pvp. See my above comment. And risk avoidance is ingrained in the mind of most 'normal' people, why expect it to be different in EVE?
You're right. Risk vs Reward is way out of whack. I wonder if this had something to do with CCP Oveur leaving, as he used to be the killdeathwtfpwned Dev and had been silent for years before his eventual quitting.
Honestly though, I still think it comes down to the fact that CCP is unwilling to risk subscriptions. They would rather make a game in the soft center than commit to one side or the other. The game had greatness in it before with lots of bugs and amateur programming, Now its polished, pretty, and soft & cuddly. |

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
914
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 01:56:00 -
[192] - Quote
Taoist Dragon wrote:Cosmo Raata wrote:I'm still baffled by the defense of FW.
It doesn't encourage pvp, people simply pvp in spite of it.
It doesn't encourage teamwork, people simply gravitate toward social activities.
It doesn't reward risk, people can avoid risk as much as they want.
Does it work as it? Sure, but being satisfied with it is like enjoying a stale sandwich without meat or condiments. Yeah, its edible, but why would you want to eat it or at least complain about what you got that is somehow called a sandwich. FW is differnet from when it was purely for fun (before inferno LP for plex system). The system has changed. It sounds like the system has changed to something that doesn't follow what you want it to be. Maybe you need to find somewhere else to be flying. TBH all the above applies to 90% of eve. Only players can encourage pvp. even through there are large number of eve players there are not enough to have pvp only mechanics from any one area. Having a requirement to kill other players for set rewards etc just can't work with such a low population. PVP will ALWAYS be on the fringe of pve or a direct conflict of players. The game just 'allows' it to happen pretty much anywhere but cannot actively encourage it.
Sure they can. Rollbacks and notifications and we will have fw sov as a pvp mechanic.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
914
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 02:04:00 -
[193] - Quote
Cosmo Raata wrote: Honestly though, I still think it comes down to the fact that CCP is unwilling to risk subscriptions. They would rather make a game in the soft center than commit to one side or the other. The game had greatness in it before with lots of bugs and amateur programming, Now its polished, pretty, and soft & cuddly.
I wouldn't recomend anything that would cost subscriptions. If they made fw sov war a pvp mechanic the farmers would just run fw missions. I actually don't mind that people like to do pve in eve. I occassionally did pve in eve. Its occassionally fun to see just how fast your new tech 2 guns can cut through rats. I am not against all pve.
Its just that all the mechanics don't need to be pve. There are already allot of pve mechanics. Sleepers, incursions, belt ratting, missions in high low and null sec, Faction war missions, cosmos missions, epic arc missions etc etc. Having one pvp mechanic that is different than the sov null sec blob mechanic can only expand the subscription base. If they get it right it will expand the player base by a whole lot. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Taoist Dragon
Bastion of Mad Behaviour Caldari State Capturing
408
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 02:29:00 -
[194] - Quote
Cearain wrote:Taoist Dragon wrote:Cosmo Raata wrote:I'm still baffled by the defense of FW.
It doesn't encourage pvp, people simply pvp in spite of it.
It doesn't encourage teamwork, people simply gravitate toward social activities.
It doesn't reward risk, people can avoid risk as much as they want.
Does it work as it? Sure, but being satisfied with it is like enjoying a stale sandwich without meat or condiments. Yeah, its edible, but why would you want to eat it or at least complain about what you got that is somehow called a sandwich. FW is differnet from when it was purely for fun (before inferno LP for plex system). The system has changed. It sounds like the system has changed to something that doesn't follow what you want it to be. Maybe you need to find somewhere else to be flying. TBH all the above applies to 90% of eve. Only players can encourage pvp. even through there are large number of eve players there are not enough to have pvp only mechanics from any one area. Having a requirement to kill other players for set rewards etc just can't work with such a low population. PVP will ALWAYS be on the fringe of pve or a direct conflict of players. The game just 'allows' it to happen pretty much anywhere but cannot actively encourage it. Sure they can. Rollbacks and notifications and we will have fw sov as a pvp mechanic.
Rollbacks I agree with but notification will do jack squat IMO. Utilmately neither of these make it pvp based as it still requires you shoot red crosses and orbit a buttan. vOv That is the Way, the Tao.
Balance is everything. |

Akiko Mayaki
State Protectorate Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 04:33:00 -
[195] - Quote
Cearain wrote:
OK so you are taking the position that the notifications will be ignored. Keep in mind that there are plenty of people who post that far from being ignored they will be watched closely not only by miltia but by neutrals with an alt in fw.
Moreover I know for a fact that I would love to know everyone plexing within 3 jumps of me. I love plex pvp. I am not the only one either. There are plenty of people who will respond to these notifications. Maybe you won't but plenty of people will.
Rabbits stick around because they can continue to plex without anyone coming to fight them. There is a reason they prefer systems with few in local. Very few will even know they are there. When you combine notifications with timer rollbacks you have a system where 5 or 6 pvp pilots spread out can easilly make sure that every plex is fought over.
You are conflating the benefits of rollbacks and a notification system. I would love rollbacks and indeed think they would cut down on the number of people flying farmer fits.
However, back to the notification system, if you love to know who's within 3 jumps of you, why don't you use any of the player driven tools that everyone else in eve uses to find their targets, intel channels immediately come to mind, plus the fact that you know, you could just fly those 3 jumps your self.
Again it is not the case that some group of farmers are doing incredible amounts of damage from a place we can't find. It is the case that farmers are plexing systems that the MILITIA DOES NOT CARE ABOUT because they are highly irrelevant to the warzone in its current form. Furthermore those pilots actually interested in real pvp are not going to fly 6 jumps to fight someone that clearly does not want to pvp, aka sitting 30km off the warp in with a cloak, stabs and already aligned.
The sole reason that it makes sense for them to fly these fits/behave in this manner is that there is no disincentive to them warping out. They know that a real pvper is not going to unwind a 28 minute button in some backroad system while the farmer sits in a safe/moves on to another plex. Timer rollbacks will fix this. To argue notifications will help , stipulates that people are struggling to "find" the farmers. This is not the case for me and I hope anyone with a functioning sense of how to find targets/ the bare basics of organization within their militia.
As someone else said, the warzones, particularly Gall/Call are far too large for the playerbase, there is no ability, incentive or desire to cover the entirety of the systems.
Cearain wrote:
The idea behind fw sov war is that we are trying to win space for our faction. I know very few people care about it now. But that is largely because they see how silly it is to try to resist the rabbit hordes. If the fw sov game turned into a small gang pvp heavan, that would change. It would be something to brag about winning. Now its not.
So now in its broken state players either move out of the warzone completely, or they just pretty much care about 1 or 2 systems that they base out of. No one cares about the other 90% of the war zone because we don't have the tools to deal with rabbit plexers.
The notification system does not need to know your personal priorities. But for those who want to fight for sov for their militia it would be a great tool. Maybe you are not interested in the sov war and just want to hold one system to dock your ships. Thats fine you can still do that. But I can guarantee you that there are plenty of fw pvpers who love plex fighting and would love to know where they need to go to fight for the complexes. What supports this claim?
I love plex fighting too, as does everyone who isn't here for the farming. Having a system that tells you where the stabbed condor is, flown buy a guy with 0 inclination to fight, is not going to help those that "love to fight over plexes," how can you not step back and see this?
Since you brought it up, I'm the alt of a Gallmill player who I assure you is deeply interested in how far we can put our boot down the Caldari throat in terms of sov war. Since December I have fought everywhere; defending Nenn, attacking Enaluri the first time, attacking Eha, attacking Rakapas and OMS, defending in Ikoskio and Kehjari as caldari tried to interrupt the push for complete control of the WZ, defending Eha, defending Nenn the second time and again pushing on Enaluri and later Innia.
I am enjoying as much small gang pvp as I can afford quite frankly, and plenty of solo too, I on a personal level, and my militia more generally, dont give two ***** about the farmers and have learnt how to fashion the warzone to our liking. Perhaps your assumptions are more grounded in the fact you have only participated in militias that fail pretty hard on the organizational side. Again, your proposed system would have been ignored since december, "come join our fleet of 20 so we can fight this callmill gang of 20 in Ena" versus "dipshit farmer that never hangs around for a fight is plexing in Deven"... like... wow.
Perhap Caldari/Ammar failcascade at stages in the farming cycle, but Gallente didn't, none of our people "moved out of the warzone" despite caldaris resurgence this year.
|

Veshta Yoshida
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
645
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 05:38:00 -
[196] - Quote
Akiko Mayaki wrote:...Perhap Caldari/Ammar failcascade at stages in the farming cycle, but Gallente didn't, none of our people "moved out of the warzone" despite caldaris resurgence this year. Completely different animals, Amarr didn't get even have access to 70% of the warzone until the e-patch and geography remains a joke compared to Black Rise which was specifically tailored/designed for FW .. much better mind you, but still a huge advantage for the Rens rabble
Then you have raw numbers, missiles have always been the "best" ratting/missioning weapon system and since starting Caldari saves you a few days a lot of new characters go that route .. isn't long before standings prevent anything but. Caldari comeback was guaranteed . Then you have umpteen adjacent null entities and large'ish pirate corps roaming the Caldari/Gallente zone giving otherwise bored pilots something to do when the enemy is on vacation.
Caldari failscaded due to people leaving in disgust over the timing of the vulnerability-farm e-patch and the CCP bias it was taken to represent and rebounded due to sheer inertia of numbers. Gallente never left because there was always something to shoot and there are a as far as i know a lot of medium.large well organized sized corps enrolled further reinforcing the 'no lack of of activity' trend.
Amarr never had numbers, it was always an uphill battle. Introduction of LP at a time when the Winmatar-fad was in full swing pushed that to its extreme as farming reared its ugly head focusing on the high value of rust products. Amarr is comprised primarily of individuals and small corps making any progress 100% dependent on inter-ego cooperation which can be rather difficult to keep up, it is why the addition of FWeddit had/has such a huge impact .. Minmatar on the other hand has same kind of medium/large size corps as Gallente, that together with the black/white lore (Evil Slaver vs. Valiant Freemen) and the "dwarf Buffet's wallet size in a week!" caused by LP made the whole affair rather one-sided.
Since anyone with half a braincell (ie. CCP apparently not included) saw what would happen were unlimited ISK thrown into the mix, we urged/begged/pleaded for CCP to introduce diminishing returns at the same time to make steam-rolling a near impossibility .. and got squat (LP tax is laughable considering the amount being generated). Now add a plexing system/tiers where a steam-roller gets more from d-plexing a 1% contested system than the enemy gets o-plexing, a system that can be abused to hell and back by gunless stabbed/cloaked alts and station lock-outs are determined by said abuse of gameplay.
They messed up. They listened to the people whose interests were wallet based rather than fun/pew based. They got lazy/frustrated and wanted us to shut up so they gave the 'majority' what they wanted; Infinite risk-free ISK and cheap faction bling.
|

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
1355
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 05:41:00 -
[197] - Quote
Akiko Mayaki wrote: Perhap Caldari/Ammar failcascade at stages in the farming cycle, but Gallente didn't, none of our people "moved out of the warzone" despite caldaris resurgence this year.
(Real men fly Gallente hulls. That's why.)
|

IbanezLaney
The Church of Awesome Caldari State Capturing
343
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 06:13:00 -
[198] - Quote
Xolve wrote: -Require plexes to have the largest allowable ship present to start the countdown. Seriously.
Great idea up to Mediums.
But wouldn't this mean large plex needs a Titan to land in it just to start the timer?
Fix this **** See Sea Pea. |

Xolve
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
1375
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 06:17:00 -
[199] - Quote
Cearain wrote:I am not sure what you mean here. But the cashout system was sort of like that. I liked the cashout system, but I think I am the only one who liked it.
Essentially, it would be a campaign system, where you would get a random 'scenario' and you would push to gain control of X hostile systems without losing y friendly systems. Once one side completed a 'phase', warzone control would reset, and another would start. Payouts would be done by activity in the warzone both through Plexing and PvP vs FW War Targets (both awarding Victory points on some scale I don't feel like putting together because it's not really the point).
In addition, new plex types would ideally be featured with minimum ship requirements (Large Strongholds, Smallest allowable ship, Battlecruiser) as well as requiring all plexes without minimum ship requirements to require the largest shiptype possible in the plex for the time to start ticking down.
The current system gives too much freedom to the individual with no loyalty to a specific faction, this idea would reward those people that have stayed true to a specific faction, would be a little less solo friendly (outside of novice/smalls), and would reduce the impact farmers have on the warzone; if the war in FW is meant to wage on forever, why not have it simulated in this manner as to not have it mimic nullsec favoring the side with the most farmers. Inappropriate signature removed. Navigator. |

IbanezLaney
The Church of Awesome Caldari State Capturing
343
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 06:39:00 -
[200] - Quote
Akiko Mayaki wrote: Perhap Caldari/Ammar failcascade at stages in the farming cycle, but Gallente didn't, none of our people "moved out of the warzone" despite caldaris resurgence this year.
It was the Minmatar hitting a high tier that changed everything for Caldari. The farmers were plexing for Caldari until the Minnies tier was more profitable and they all swapped over. I admit - Caldari were hoping to hang onto the farmers a bit longer but luck/timing wasn't on our side.
So the 'failscade' was really just a huge manpower shift to Minmatar.
ALSO: The Gallente can counter any Caldari plan before it starts with the known intel leak we have.
Fix this **** See Sea Pea. |

Lin Suizei
137
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 07:02:00 -
[201] - Quote
Akiko Mayaki wrote:The sole reason that it makes sense for them to fly these fits/behave in this manner is that there is no disincentive to them warping out. They know that a real pvper is not going to unwind a 28 minute button in some backroad system while the farmer sits in a safe/moves on to another plex.
Timer rollbacks will fix this.
A timer rollback is still forcing PvPers to sit in a plex to "block" a farmer from completing it - I don't see this working for long, because no-one wants to sit in a plex to stop a farmer from returning to finish the plex. Timer resets, or extremely fast rollbacks (20 minutes capture, 2 minutes rollback) and/or misc. penalties for abandoning a plex might be a bit more effective.
Spot on re: cause and effect though, pity CCP doesn't seem to share your point of view. Xeros S*** > are you really suprised? im not here to pvp so why the fuc not Xeros S**** > oh go cry somewhere else, im not in fw for the ****** pvp
Welcome to faction war. |

chatgris
Quantum Cats Syndicate Samurai Pizza Cats
473
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 07:09:00 -
[202] - Quote
Lin Suizei wrote:Akiko Mayaki wrote:The sole reason that it makes sense for them to fly these fits/behave in this manner is that there is no disincentive to them warping out. They know that a real pvper is not going to unwind a 28 minute button in some backroad system while the farmer sits in a safe/moves on to another plex.
Timer rollbacks will fix this. A timer rollback is still forcing PvPers to sit in a plex to "block" a farmer from completing it - I don't see this working for long, because no-one wants to sit in a plex to stop a farmer from returning to finish the plex. Timer resets, or extremely fast rollbacks (20 minutes capture, 2 minutes rollback) and/or misc. penalties for abandoning a plex might be a bit more effective. Spot on re: cause and effect though, pity CCP doesn't seem to share your point of view.
The point is that while you are chasing the farmer, he is losing time on the plex he left. If you chase him across multiple systems and he keeps running, his work is undone. |

Lin Suizei
137
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 09:24:00 -
[203] - Quote
chatgris wrote:The point is that while you are chasing the farmer, he is losing time on the plex he left. If you chase him across multiple systems and he keeps running, his work is undone.
We both know he's (the farmer's) not going to leave the system, and no-one's going to "chase" him. The farmer is simply going to wait cloaked until the PvPer leaves. Are you willing to sit in the plex and block the farmer, one minute of your time for one minute of his? I doubt it.
Who do you think has more patience - the farmer, who is probably pseudo-botting ice on six other accounts, or the PvPer who wants a gudfite? Xeros S*** > are you really suprised? im not here to pvp so why the fuc not Xeros S**** > oh go cry somewhere else, im not in fw for the ****** pvp
Welcome to faction war. |

Veshta Yoshida
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
645
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 09:32:00 -
[204] - Quote
Lin Suizei wrote:chatgris wrote:The point is that while you are chasing the farmer, he is losing time on the plex he left. If you chase him across multiple systems and he keeps running, his work is undone. We both know he's (the farmer's) not going to leave the system, and no-one's going to "chase" him. The farmer is simply going to wait cloaked until the PvPer leaves. Are you willing to sit in the plex and block the farmer, one minute of your time for one minute of his? I doubt it. Who do you think has more patience - the farmer, who is probably pseudo-botting ice on six other accounts, or the PvPer who wants a gudfite? Cloaking is the only way for the farmer to "beat" the auto-run scenario and there are ways that. At a coin slot to the beacon, insert 1000LP and it emits a 30km smartbomb blast doing 1 point of damage .. problem solved (assuming damage still decloaks, been so long since I used those infernal modules)  |

Muad 'dib
The Imperial Fedaykin Amarrian Commandos
903
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 10:25:00 -
[205] - Quote
so once you take the whole war zone you can keep it for every with 3 alts per system cloaked all day stoping more sites popping up?
grreaaaattt - dont temp the farmers, they have the altpower Cosmic signature detected. . . . http://img299.imageshack.us/img299/4375/mynewsig2.jpg
CCP Hilmar CEO > "why am i sweating, why is the game doing this to me"
|

March rabbit
epTa Team Inc.
658
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 10:52:00 -
[206] - Quote
Lin Suizei wrote:chatgris wrote:The point is that while you are chasing the farmer, he is losing time on the plex he left. If you chase him across multiple systems and he keeps running, his work is undone. We both know he's (the farmer's) not going to leave the system, and no-one's going to "chase" him. The farmer is simply going to wait cloaked until the PvPer leaves. Are you willing to sit in the plex and block the farmer, one minute of your time for one minute of his? I doubt it. Who do you think has more patience - the farmer, who is probably pseudo-botting ice on six other accounts, or the PvPer who wants a gudfite? so you don't want to spend :EFFORT: and want CCP to do it for you?  |

Akiko Mayaki
State Protectorate Caldari State
5
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 11:17:00 -
[207] - Quote
Lin Suizei wrote:Akiko Mayaki wrote:The sole reason that it makes sense for them to fly these fits/behave in this manner is that there is no disincentive to them warping out. They know that a real pvper is not going to unwind a 28 minute button in some backroad system while the farmer sits in a safe/moves on to another plex.
Timer rollbacks will fix this. A timer rollback is still forcing PvPers to sit in a plex to "block" a farmer from completing it - I don't see this working for long, because no-one wants to sit in a plex to stop a farmer from returning to finish the plex. Timer resets, or extremely fast rollbacks (20 minutes capture, 2 minutes rollback) and/or misc. penalties for abandoning a plex might be a bit more effective. Spot on re: cause and effect though, pity CCP doesn't seem to share your point of view.
Yes I would say what I meant by 'rollback' could quite easily, and would probably have to, encompass 'extremely fast' rollbacks.
Its not so much about me having to block a farmer from completing a plex. Currently a farmer is just going to warp out of the plex when I arrive, he has no disincentive not to, he can choose 100% chance of not dying and warp out for 0 penalty as most pvpers don't care.
Timer rollbacks would introduce a penalty to such behavior, granted, there may well be those farmers that cop the extra time penalty on the chin and keep running/fitting stabs, but hopefully we can begin to influence behavior.
Enough changes in this direction and you can begin to change what is the 'most effective' way to farm. Most pvpers know this already, If you actually want to make the most LP you can on a single character, fit him for pvp. Me going out and running 5 novices consecutively without being interrupted sure looks more profitable than a farmer who can pick up a 'tail' for who knows how long and is constantly being interrupted.
Continually increase the penalties/disincentives for leaving a plex, and said farmers will adopt a strategy that does work (defending their plex.) |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
578
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 11:35:00 -
[208] - Quote
Cearain wrote: They aren't being plexed for the 30 seconds to a minute that I go through there. But you can't draw any large conclusions from that.
Yet you say in your general experience you can travel 5 systems without finding anyone plexing. This isnt a one off, its your general experience. Sure, conclusions arnt made of this observation, but it doesnt suggest that farming is completely out of control either.
Farming needs to be addressed. Preventing stabbed ships from activating an acceleration gate would be one. Preventing a ship with a cloak from running a timer regardless of if the cloak was active would be another. That wouldnt prevent people from baiting people in for an easy kill and suddenly falcon.
Cearain wrote: The conflict driver in faction war is having both sides try to take sov in the same systems.
No the conflict driver is the rewards boths sides stand to get for having a certain number of systems. Outside homesystems it doesnt really matter which systems specifically. I do not consider that broken.
Cearain wrote: As far as tweaking vp amounts, its funny you say that is beyond me. I suggested that giving lp for defensive plexing might unbalance the system too much and instead they should tweak the vp amounts if one side was having trouble hitting higher tiers. Its ok youll catch up.
Its not your idea, its Veshta Yoshida's iirc. I personally think there are issues with vp rewards being inversely proportional to LP rewards.
As for lp for defensive plexing, it think its working fine. It encourages some stability in what was a boom bust cycle before in the utterly broken cashout system you loved. Talk about catching up, you still think that was better than what we have now lol. |

Muad 'dib
The Imperial Fedaykin Amarrian Commandos
903
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 11:53:00 -
[209] - Quote
also can i have a tiny bit of FW standing CCP for fw kills? to go with the tiny bit of LP
I hit my top rank ages ago and i get no more boosts to my standing. Not good for corp standings if your the CEO etc.
its easy to do, so just do it (i dont care if we get nothing for newb ships and shuttle ofc)
I sure as hell loose some if i shoot the wrong guy, accidental or otherwise my standing does not move unless i do missions (which i can't do because theres no agent in available stations) Cosmic signature detected. . . . http://img299.imageshack.us/img299/4375/mynewsig2.jpg
CCP Hilmar CEO > "why am i sweating, why is the game doing this to me"
|

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
917
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 12:43:00 -
[210] - Quote
Lin Suizei wrote:Akiko Mayaki wrote:The sole reason that it makes sense for them to fly these fits/behave in this manner is that there is no disincentive to them warping out. They know that a real pvper is not going to unwind a 28 minute button in some backroad system while the farmer sits in a safe/moves on to another plex.
Timer rollbacks will fix this. A timer rollback is still forcing PvPers to sit in a plex to "block" a farmer from completing it - I don't see this working for long, because no-one wants to sit in a plex to stop a farmer from returning to finish the plex. Timer resets, or extremely fast rollbacks (20 minutes capture, 2 minutes rollback) and/or misc. penalties for abandoning a plex might be a bit more effective. Spot on re: cause and effect though, pity CCP doesn't seem to share your point of view.
Ideally the pvper will sit in a different plex in that same system while the rabbits work is undone. So he will effectively run 2 timers.
If the rollbacks only worked when someone was on grid in the plex or with the accell gate at the time of warp out then one pvper could potentially have several plexes counting back in his militias favor.
Combined with notifications this would be very powerful.
I know I would be much more willing to sit in a plex running a timer if I knew the enemies around me knew where I was. It would mean I am just about as likely to get pvp by staying there as moving on.
But yeah rollbacks alone probably wont be enough. They can only help though.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Stalking Mantis
Amarrian Vengeance
260
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 13:04:00 -
[211] - Quote
Achamian Zanjoahir wrote:Yeah really, put the WARFARE in FW! QFT |

Lin Suizei
137
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 13:16:00 -
[212] - Quote
Cearain wrote:I know I would be much more willing to sit in a plex running a timer if I knew the enemies around me knew where I was. It would mean I am just about as likely to get pvp by staying there as moving on.
With regards to you getting PvP by sitting in a system and blocking a farmer, I must disagree - these are systems which no-one cares about. Not many people pass by that way, and there's no public boosting fleet, so not many people will engage you in PvP. It's boring for you, and the farmer is winning because you are bored, and next time you won't come back. This is why rollbacks must be extremely fast, to the point where a PvPer can disrupt every farmer in a system by spending one minute of his time warping to every plex, wasting 19 minutes of the farmer's time that he's chased out.
You could implement notifications - but let's say you received 10 notifications, and the (realistically) first 9 were stabbed farmers. How inclined would you be to chase the 10th?
Akiko Mayaki wrote:Continually increase the penalties/disincentives for leaving a plex, and said farmers will adopt a strategy that does work (defending their plex.)
+1. Now if only CCP was reading your post. Xeros S*** > are you really suprised? im not here to pvp so why the fuc not Xeros S**** > oh go cry somewhere else, im not in fw for the ****** pvp
Welcome to faction war. |

March rabbit
epTa Team Inc.
659
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 13:51:00 -
[213] - Quote
Lin Suizei wrote:With regards to you getting PvP by sitting in a system and blocking a farmer, I must disagree - these are systems which no-one cares about. Not many people pass by that way, and there's no public boosting fleet, so not many people will engage you in PvP. It's boring for you, and the farmer is winning because you are bored, and next time you won't come back. This is why rollbacks must be extremely fast, to the point where a PvPer can disrupt every farmer in a system by spending one minute of his time warping to every plex, wasting 19 minutes of the farmer's time that he's chased out.
i have the better idea: insta-biomass any farmers in plex when you warp to beacon 
PvPers these days.....  |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
1355
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 14:26:00 -
[214] - Quote
March rabbit wrote:i have the better idea: insta-biomass any farmers in plex when you warp to beacon  PvPers these days.....  Now we're getting there! Parasites or toxic clouds that navies intentional put inside deadspace plexes. They attack WCS and cloaking devices, doing 100 dps/ module. |

ALUCARD 1208
Spiritus Draconis Sicarius Draconis
179
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 15:03:00 -
[215] - Quote
cearain wrote: As far as finding pvp. I get about 100-150 solo pvp kills a month. It could be better but Thats not too bad for the time I spend online.
You havnt broken 100 kills for nrly 4 yrs GÖÑ HIGH FIVES GÖÑ-á |

Wey'oun
Shadows Of The Federation Drunk 'n' Disorderly
95
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 15:20:00 -
[216] - Quote
ALUCARD 1208 wrote:cearain wrote: As far as finding pvp. I get about 100-150 solo pvp kills a month. It could be better but Thats not too bad for the time I spend online.
You havnt broken 100 kills for nrly 4 yrs
in b4 emergency 'IM ON ALT' response |

Draconis VI
Porezna Uprava
2
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 15:35:00 -
[217] - Quote
from what i can see fw is not broken,amarr are basicaly just whining about losing |

Xolve
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
1375
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 16:03:00 -
[218] - Quote
cearain wrote: As far as finding pvp. I get about 100-150 solo pvp kills a month. It could be better but Thats not too bad for the time I spend online.
I only know one way to respond to this level of ridiculous, and here it is:
You what mate? 100-150 kills a month you say? In what fantasy dream world?
Inappropriate signature removed. Navigator. |

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
918
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 16:14:00 -
[219] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:Cearain wrote: They aren't being plexed for the 30 seconds to a minute that I go through there. But you can't draw any large conclusions from that.
Yet you say in your general experience you can travel 5 systems without finding anyone plexing. This isnt a one off, its your general experience. Sure, conclusions arnt made of this observation, but it doesnt suggest that farming is completely out of control either.
You can't draw a conclusion as to how much of a problem rabbits are from that, because that doesn't compare rabbits to pvpers. Also it doesn't tell us if people are in there to farm or just to find pvp. I don't assume everyone in the top belt of a system is there to mine.
The fact that about 80% of the people who are in a militia warp out or cloak as soon as I warp to them tells us how much of an impact farmers are having.
The fact that the top daily vp earners have no kills for the day the earned the top spot tells us farmers are having an impact.
The fact that the same plexes stay open all day in the hot pvp systems tells us that the pvpers even when they are in a plex for fights don't bother to wait out the timer if no fights are coming.
Crosi Wesdo wrote: Farming needs to be addressed. Preventing stabbed ships from activating an acceleration gate would be one. Preventing a ship with a cloak from running a timer regardless of if the cloak was active would be another. That wouldnt prevent people from baiting people in for an easy kill and suddenly falcon..
I'm generally not in favor of special rules but something may have to be done about cloaking. The problem with just banning cloaks is that if you want to go into enemy space with a larger ship where you can't dock the cloak helps avoid gate camps and allows you to dock up in a safe while your pvp and pve timers run.
Perhaps if you cloak in a plex you lose 4 minutes off your timer capped at neutral.
Cearain wrote: The conflict driver in faction war is having both sides try to take sov in the same systems.
No the conflict driver is the rewards boths sides stand to get for having a certain number of systems. Outside homesystems it doesnt really matter which systems specifically. I do not consider that broken.[/quote]
Its not an either or they both drive conflict. The rewards just amplify the conflict.
Cearain wrote: As far as tweaking vp amounts, its funny you say that is beyond me. I suggested that giving lp for defensive plexing might unbalance the system too much and instead they should tweak the vp amounts if one side was having trouble hitting higher tiers. Its ok youll catch up.
Its not your idea, its Veshta Yoshida's iirc. I personally think there are issues with vp rewards being inversely proportional to LP rewards.
As for lp for defensive plexing, it think its working fine. It encourages some stability in what was a boom bust cycle before in the utterly broken cashout system you loved. Talk about catching up, you still think that was better than what we have now lol.[/quote]
You call it stability I call it stagnation. The cashout system got people leaving their booster alts and blobs in their homes systems and fighting for allot more systems. You had to flip 80% of the systems. Now gallente just sit at tier 2 and don't even care. People don't care about broken mechanics and the new lp pay stucture demonstrates this.
Now the percent of kills are concentrated to a few systems like pre inferno. The cashout system actually helped the losing side because they would continue to rack up lp. That would in turn create more and more of an incentive to hit a higher tier to cash it out. Now no one really cares about 90% of the systems.
I didn't say coorelating vp requirments with lp payouts was my idea. I said that I predicted the stagnation we currently have and thought ccp should look at tweaking vp requirments if they needed to.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
918
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 16:23:00 -
[220] - Quote
Xolve wrote:cearain wrote: As far as finding pvp. I get about 100-150 solo pvp kills a month. It could be better but Thats not too bad for the time I spend online. I only know one way to respond to this level of ridiculous, and here it is: You what mate? 100-150 kills a month you say? In what fantasy dream world?
I will let you in on a big secret. "Cearaen" is also my character.
http://eve-kill.net/?a=corp_detail&crp_id=287922&view=pilot_solo&m=04&y=2013
Those are what evekill counts as solo kills. I have only teamed up with people for about 3-5 kills in the last 2 months. So most of my kills that are not considered solo kills are often due to someone not shaking aggro from a previous fight or someone just rolling into a fight. I will let you in on a big secret. "Cearaen" is also my character. To be fair I whored on that navy mega kill but that is about the only kill I knew I was having help with.
http://eve-kill.net/?a=corp_detail&crp_id=287922&view=pilot_kills&m=4&y=2013 Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

cearaen
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
8
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 16:29:00 -
[221] - Quote
What? Who are you? I don't know this guy at all!
Anyone can see we are completely different characters. Completely different. |

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
918
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 18:56:00 -
[222] - Quote
Lin Suizei wrote:Cearain wrote:I know I would be much more willing to sit in a plex running a timer if I knew the enemies around me knew where I was. It would mean I am just about as likely to get pvp by staying there as moving on. With regards to you getting PvP by sitting in a system and blocking a farmer, I must disagree - these are systems which no-one cares about. Not many people pass by that way, and there's no public boosting fleet, so not many people will engage you in PvP. It's boring for you, and the farmer is winning because you are bored, and next time you won't come back. This is why rollbacks must be extremely fast, to the point where a PvPer can disrupt every farmer in a system by spending one minute of his time warping to every plex, wasting 19 minutes of the farmer's time that he's chased out.
There are 2 main reasons no one cares about the other 90% of systems. 1) Its broken because rabbits are the most efficient way to win. No one cares about a broken game. Notifications and a form of rollback will change that. Yes you are right that ccp may need to tweak the rollback timers. But lots of people like to fight outside areas where everyone has their booster alt and blob for back up.
2) They changed the payout stucture so that there is very little reason to even try to hit tier 5. When they had the cashout stucture you had to get 80% of systems to hit tier 5. So this meant people did care about the other 90%.
Lin Suizei wrote: You could implement notifications - but let's say you received 10 notifications, and the (realistically) first 9 were stabbed farmers. How inclined would you be to chase the 10th? .
If each farmer I chased out immediately lost say 3 minutes off their timer and then the plex started rolling back from there (both capped out at neutral.) I would keep them out. If I could find about 6 others in the amarr militia to do this with we could each easilly cover about 10 systems and win faction war. Of course the other miltiias would have pvpers as well and so what you would find is that many pvpers would start joining faction war and you would see much more wide spread pvp throughout the faction war zones. (not just 2 jumps from kourm) I would likely actually need the lp I make from plexing just to replace my t1 hulls.
With these changes the ratio of farmers to pvpers would no longer be 9 to 1. The farmers would definitely make more isk doing things like running missions - even faction war missions. The ratio of pvper to rabbit would likely reverse and be 9 to 1 in favor of pvpers.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Maximus Hashur
Vanus Technical Solutions Corp Covert Intervention
58
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 20:35:00 -
[223] - Quote
IbanezLaney wrote:[ ALSO: The Gallente can counter any Caldari plan before it starts with the known intel leak we have.
Please post the full character name of this leak for my records. Ill keep it quiet. Looked up...saw this F***ING clown dropping like a rock.-á Woke up in Vylade wondering what just happened!!! |

ALUCARD 1208
Spiritus Draconis Sicarius Draconis
179
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 22:22:00 -
[224] - Quote
had to do it but after cross matching your boards cearain u still only managed ur prediction a handfull of times over 4 years not everymonth like stated GÖÑ HIGH FIVES GÖÑ-á |

IbanezLaney
The Church of Awesome Caldari State Capturing
343
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 22:40:00 -
[225] - Quote
Maximus Hashur wrote:IbanezLaney wrote:[ ALSO: The Gallente can counter any Caldari plan before it starts with the known intel leak we have.
Please post the full character name of this leak for my records. Ill keep it quiet.
Np - How much would you like to pay? Fix this **** See Sea Pea. |

Terhiss
Moira. Villore Accords
34
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 23:34:00 -
[226] - Quote
i think Deen makes a fair point on the subject, many of the involved in this conversation seem to extremise a little too much the present state of things in facwar.
Here is how I interpret the intentions of the developpers regarding this part of the game;
the lowsec sovereignity game is on the better part irrelevant to the amount of combat that takes place throughout its map. I see it as a mechanic that is well distinguished from the actual warfare between the two sides. It is only relevant to the economy; it is the means of sustaining the ever-continuous belligerence between lowsec dwellers, as the amount of held and upgraded solar systems mainly impacts on profitability of FW activity, such as missions and plexing, and not on numbers or quality of fights you obtain.
The goal of the developper here is to create a balance between a means to sustain our pvp and the warzone where all those assets are deployed, to create a resource-generating profession and fuse it into the battlefield daily activity. Sovereignty is irrelevant to your operational capability, less loosing a core system of course which can negate you a prime strategical waypoint. but If you seek true-impact sovereignty chess games, you understand that perhaps you should turn your gaze towards other areas of the starmap. The goal of the company was also to provide the warfare that is forecasted in factional warfare; we can agree to this day, they have set on a promising path. If your problem is you can't get fights, then I believe something isnt correct in the expectations you carry towards lowsec warfare. I do not remember the last time I lurked around placid/black rise more than 15 minutes without being engaged.
But if you take part in a satisfying number of fights, but have a problem with Lp rabbit farmers, aka people making money on your watch that you can do nothing about, i believe you arent really concentrating your focus on fights to begin with. If you really put importance into FacWar then you would probably not even give attention to farmers, who since the dawn of gaming have existed, no matter how hard you despize them.
And by all means, lets face it, Ccp has given us a very efficient and pofitable way of fueling our dearest activity; Eve pvp. I say lets thank the hand that feeds us and not complain about the sand grain on our cheesecake. |

Taoist Dragon
Bastion of Mad Behaviour Caldari State Capturing
416
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 23:36:00 -
[227] - Quote
IbanezLaney wrote:Maximus Hashur wrote:IbanezLaney wrote:[ ALSO: The Gallente can counter any Caldari plan before it starts with the known intel leak we have.
Please post the full character name of this leak for my records. Ill keep it quiet. Np - How much would you like to pay?
It's ME!, It's ME!, It's ME!, It's ME!, It's ME!, It's ME!, It's ME!, It's ME!, It's ME!
Ah hold on a sec, you said intel leak......hmm but that would imply having intelligence to leak out.
bugger!
I guess it's not me after all.   That is the Way, the Tao.
Balance is everything. |

Cosmo Raata
T-Cells Moar Tears
56
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 01:20:00 -
[228] - Quote
Terhiss wrote:i think Deen makes a fair point on the subject, many of the involved in this conversation seem to extremise a little too much the present state of things in facwar.
Here is how I interpret the intentions of the developpers regarding this part of the game;
the lowsec sovereignity game is on the better part irrelevant to the amount of combat that takes place throughout its map. I see it as a mechanic that is well distinguished from the actual warfare between the two sides. It is only relevant to the economy; it is the means of sustaining the ever-continuous belligerence between lowsec dwellers, as the amount of held and upgraded solar systems mainly impacts on profitability of FW activity, such as missions and plexing, and not on numbers or quality of fights you obtain.
The goal of the developper here is to create a balance between a means to sustain our pvp and the warzone where all those assets are deployed, to create a resource-generating profession and fuse it into the battlefield daily activity. Sovereignty is irrelevant to your operational capability, less loosing a core system of course which can negate you a prime strategical waypoint. but If you seek true-impact sovereignty chess games, you understand that perhaps you should turn your gaze towards other areas of the starmap. The goal of the company was also to provide the warfare that is forecasted in factional warfare; we can agree to this day, they have set on a promising path. If your problem is you can't get fights, then I believe something isnt correct in the expectations you carry towards lowsec warfare. I do not remember the last time I lurked around placid/black rise more than 15 minutes without being engaged.
But if you take part in a satisfying number of fights, but have a problem with Lp rabbit farmers, aka people making money on your watch that you can do nothing about, i believe you arent really concentrating your focus on fights to begin with. If you really put importance into FacWar then you would probably not even give attention to farmers, who since the dawn of gaming have existed, no matter how hard you despize them.
And by all means, lets face it, Ccp has given us a very efficient and pofitable way of fueling our dearest activity; Eve pvp. I say lets thank the hand that feeds us and not complain about the sand grain on our cheesecake.
Sorry, but first we're not talking about a single sand grain on our cheesecake, but even if we did I dare wonder who of us still eats the cheesecake at a restaurant after discovering sand on it.
I think we fail to realize that we pay for CCP's livelihood and WE should determine when something isn't good enough and THEY should want to fix it when WE complain.
No wonder we let our politicians become corrupt in rl, we just let them do whatever they want to us in the name of "they do so much already for us". |

Taoist Dragon
Bastion of Mad Behaviour Caldari State Capturing
416
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 01:59:00 -
[229] - Quote
Cosmo Raata wrote:
Sorry, but first we're not talking about a single sand grain on our cheesecake, but even if we did I dare wonder who of us still eats the cheesecake at a restaurant after discovering sand on it.
I think we fail to realize that we pay for CCP's livelihood and WE should determine when something isn't good enough and THEY should want to fix it when WE complain.
No wonder we let our politicians become corrupt in rl, we just let them do whatever they want to us in the name of "they do so much already for us".
So everytime someone cry's CCP should come and give us a hug and wipe our arses for us right?!
The players for the most are the worst people to decide the way a game is developed generally. Sure there are few who have enough insite and general fortitude to actualy do the game some good but most are whiney crybabies who just want their stuff to be better than their opponents.
CCP has a bigger picture view than 99% of the playerbase so they can keep it going for so long. Take look at how moany other mmo's have had such a long as Eve adn then think on why the other failed....a lot failed because the developers listened to all the tears and changed **** that they didn't understand to pander to some childish whiners. Balance is the key and Eve is getting better and better all the time with regards to this. That is the Way, the Tao.
Balance is everything. |

2manno Asp
The Imperial Fedaykin Amarrian Commandos
261
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 02:31:00 -
[230] - Quote
Zarnak Wulf wrote: People don't really need to be paid 2x or 3x the amount to circle a button. The end result of the FW system ownership. The ownership should bring the goods - not the process of acquiring it.
details aside, a good point. |

Cosmo Raata
T-Cells Moar Tears
56
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 03:20:00 -
[231] - Quote
Taoist Dragon wrote:Cosmo Raata wrote:
Sorry, but first we're not talking about a single sand grain on our cheesecake, but even if we did I dare wonder who of us still eats the cheesecake at a restaurant after discovering sand on it.
I think we fail to realize that we pay for CCP's livelihood and WE should determine when something isn't good enough and THEY should want to fix it when WE complain.
No wonder we let our politicians become corrupt in rl, we just let them do whatever they want to us in the name of "they do so much already for us".
So everytime someone cry's CCP should come and give us a hug and wipe our arses for us right?! The players for the most are the worst people to decide the way a game is developed generally. Sure there are few who have enough insite and general fortitude to actualy do the game some good but most are whiney crybabies who just want their stuff to be better than their opponents. CCP has a bigger picture view than 99% of the playerbase so they can keep it going for so long. Take look at how moany other mmo's have had such a long as Eve adn then think on why the other failed....a lot failed because the developers listened to all the tears and changed **** that they didn't understand to pander to some childish whiners. Balance is the key and Eve is getting better and better all the time with regards to this.
I have more tenure as a player than most of the current CCP employees, so I can surely respond to this.
You're full of sh*t.
CCP has been successful because they listen to their player base, the last time they ignored us they almost completely lost the game to unsubbing, BY THEIR OWN ADMISSION. They have a CSM, they present ideas on a test server and ask for feedback all the time. Hell, they may have a vision of their game, but 99% of the ideas probably come from the player base. You need to remove CCP from your pedestal and realize that the players make this game the great game that it is and at times people ask for stupid changes and CCP has the vision to ignore them.
Good Lord, leave it to some 2011 player who hasn't been around long enough to remember the awesomeness of high risk/reward pvp they once had in this game. Took me 2 months to earn enough for a skill book and a damn badger mark II. Had to ninja mine for bistot while mOo threatened to kill you and there was no insurance or warp to zero or bookmarks. This game has been on easy mode and tbh, they are about as close to the risk/reward system of WoW as they have ever been.
All we're asking for it some balls to create something based on its name, FACTIONAL WARFARE. Its plexing, and the pvp to be had with it is no more than you can find in empire by dueling ignorant noobs.
Just do us all a favor and share your comments where they may do some good, perhaps we have a cooking thread and you can talk more about cheesecake. |

Taoist Dragon
Bastion of Mad Behaviour Caldari State Capturing
416
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 04:46:00 -
[232] - Quote
Cosmo Raata wrote: I have more tenure as a player than most of the current CCP employees, so I can surely respond to this.
You're full of sh*t.
CCP has been successful because they listen to their player base, the last time they ignored us they almost completely lost the game to unsubbing, BY THEIR OWN ADMISSION. They have a CSM, they present ideas on a test server and ask for feedback all the time. Hell, they may have a vision of their game, but 99% of the ideas probably come from the player base. You need to remove CCP from your pedestal and realize that the players make this game the great game that it is and at times people ask for stupid changes and CCP has the vision to ignore them.
Good Lord, leave it to some 2011 player who hasn't been around long enough to remember the awesomeness of high risk/reward pvp they once had in this game. Took me 2 months to earn enough for a skill book and a damn badger mark II. Had to ninja mine for bistot while mOo threatened to kill you and there was no insurance or warp to zero or bookmarks. This game has been on easy mode and tbh, they are about as close to the risk/reward system of WoW as they have ever been.
All we're asking for it some balls to create something based on its name, FACTIONAL WARFARE. Its plexing, and the pvp to be had with it is no more than you can find in empire by dueling ignorant noobs.
You and Terhiss should do us all a favor and share your comments where they may do some good, perhaps we have a cooking thread and you two can talk more about cheesecake.
Just a bit of background for you as an FYI.
I started playing EVE on day 1 of release so I have plenty of time in the world of new eden to see the biggest highs and lowest lows. It took me litteraly months to afford my first arbitrator, so get over yourself and have a bit of humilty. It'll do you good in the long run trust me. Please don't insult yourself assuming this is the only toon I have played on (as I have already mentioned in a lot of my other posts my history with eve)
Ok chest beating over with.
Since when did I say that a game developer shouldn't listen to the players? I didn't. What I said was that they shouldn't give us a hug and wipe our arse. i.e. not just give us everything we ask for as players because 'we' as players are generally a bunch of greedy, ignorant people as to what is 'best for the game'.
The fact that CCP is actively engaging the playerbase is an excellent thing and is one of the biggest fails that happened in the past. But this by no means indicates that everything that gets put down on these forums should be implemented into the game, that would kill it quicker than a tac nuke in the back yard. Looking back into MMO history - Ultima Online, the pioneer in pvp centric games. Well a lot of players asked for a 'pve' area that was safer for them to play in. sure they got it and for a year or so subs went up but then they quickly declined and even though the game is still around today it is a shadow of it's former glory.
So you serisouly think that we should just get what we ask for when we cry on these forums?!
There is nothing stopping you having the FW you want. Just get out there and make it happen rather than whine on the forums about it. Seriously the mechanics aren't the issue. It's people apathy to actually putting the effort in to make something happen so they whine on the forums and expect CCP to wipe their arse, give them a hug and a nice lollypop. Man if the older playerbase did that during the first couple of years of eve then most of the 'golden history' or eve would never have happend because all the players would have quit because you know :effort:
Get over it! That is the Way, the Tao.
Balance is everything. |

Veshta Yoshida
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
648
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 08:15:00 -
[233] - Quote
Cosmo Raata wrote:...CCP has been successful because they listen to their player base, the last time they ignored us they almost completely lost the game to unsubbing, BY THEIR OWN ADMISSION... Me'thinks you give the Jita blob too much credit. Yes, they would have lost a lot of old-timers but at the same they would have attracted all the Themepark/Sims teenagerrs carrying their parents credit cards .. CCP did not change course as such, but rather took a detour, Capt. quarters is still with us and being worked on just slower and more deliberately (ie. focus change, not course change). All the Jita debacle did was give CCP reason to do some good old introspection on what they wanted Eve to be .. by their own admission .. the employees signed up for spaceships and are oddly enough happier now that they get to work with spaceships.
Taoist Dragon wrote:...There is nothing stopping you having the FW you want. Just get out there and make it happen rather than whine on the forums about it. Seriously the mechanics aren't the issue... So the fact that income and right to dock, both immensely important for non-Titan pew, is directly tied to risk-free alt farming activity is just something that can be ignored or worked around through :effort:?
Pray tell, How? Spam alts to counter the alts? Waste 80% of ones time in warp between beacons chasing stab-monkeys? Blob the snot out of an enemy?
Mechanics are very much the issue. The whole sand-box thing is nothing but marketing propaganda, Eve left that ages ago .. about the same time as reinforcement timers (ie. POS) were introduced. Sure they are trying to minimize it but don't delude yourself by saying that it it is full of sand .. by far the sandiest on the market but not 'pure'.
|

Muad 'dib
The Imperial Fedaykin Amarrian Commandos
906
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 11:02:00 -
[234] - Quote
Veshta Yoshida wrote:Taoist Dragon wrote:...There is nothing stopping you having the FW you want. Just get out there and make it happen rather than whine on the forums about it. Seriously the mechanics aren't the issue... So the fact that income and right to dock, both immensely important for non-Titan pew, is directly tied to risk-free alt farming activity is just something that can be ignored or worked around through :effort:? Pray tell, How? Spam alts to counter the alts? Waste 80% of ones time in warp between beacons chasing stab-monkeys? Blob the snot out of an enemy?
Yeah just go an convince more people to make farm alts than there are farmers against you to join your losing side, so you can flip the systems so pvpers can pvp better by actually docking to reship/refit etc
its that easy.  Cosmic signature detected. . . . http://img299.imageshack.us/img299/4375/mynewsig2.jpg
CCP Hilmar CEO > "why am i sweating, why is the game doing this to me"
|

Taoist Dragon
Bastion of Mad Behaviour Caldari State Capturing
417
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 11:23:00 -
[235] - Quote
Muad 'dib wrote:Veshta Yoshida wrote:Taoist Dragon wrote:...There is nothing stopping you having the FW you want. Just get out there and make it happen rather than whine on the forums about it. Seriously the mechanics aren't the issue... So the fact that income and right to dock, both immensely important for non-Titan pew, is directly tied to risk-free alt farming activity is just something that can be ignored or worked around through :effort:? Pray tell, How? Spam alts to counter the alts? Waste 80% of ones time in warp between beacons chasing stab-monkeys? Blob the snot out of an enemy? Yeah just go an convince more people to make farm alts than there are farmers against you, to join your losing side where they wont make much money, so you can flip the systems so pvpers can pvp better by actually docking to reship/refit etc its that easy and the mechanics are fine. 
This exactly.
You all want FW to be something it's not. It's not about GF's and bragging rights anymore. If you can't be arsed to plex for sov then stop bitching about how much the other side is getting LP cos you are not out there with your friends plexing back.
In reality the mechanics of FW have changed very little since it came out. But the rewards have. so the meta game changes with it. Funny that sounds just like the rest of eve. And when other players whine about how their little part of eve changes what is the no1 response?
Adapt of GTFO!
FW'ers are not special snowflakes. You don't deserve to have everything changed cos you don't like that other players and coming in and kicking you out of your stations. If you want to do something about it go ahead. Man up (or woman up, eve is an equal sexes game after all) and go kick them out.
I enjoy FW now. I enjoyed FW before. Because I made it fun for ME. Stop crying and grow up and go out and fight for your space if that's what you want to do. If not the STFU and stop crying. That is the Way, the Tao.
Balance is everything. |

Muad 'dib
The Imperial Fedaykin Amarrian Commandos
906
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 11:34:00 -
[236] - Quote
im not sure why fw is even in low sec anymore, since the focus is to get chars into it for the easy isk and not about pvp
they would get more alts rolled if it was high sec tbh
but oh noes? who would shoot the hubs!? Cosmic signature detected. . . . http://img299.imageshack.us/img299/4375/mynewsig2.jpg
CCP Hilmar CEO > "why am i sweating, why is the game doing this to me"
|

Taoist Dragon
Bastion of Mad Behaviour Caldari State Capturing
417
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 12:07:00 -
[237] - Quote
Muad 'dib wrote:im not sure why fw is even in low sec anymore, since the focus is to get chars into it for the easy isk and not about pvp
they would get more alts rolled if it was high sec tbh
but oh noes? who would shoot the hubs!?
Good point my imperial friend.
Post it in the F&I area so more people can go over there about FW as well. That is the Way, the Tao.
Balance is everything. |

Karl Planck
Heretic Army Atrocitas
318
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 15:44:00 -
[238] - Quote
Zarnak Wulf wrote: Fix Null - People, corps, and alliances don't leave because there are no other real choices being offered to them.
Remove OGB - Veterans on both sides farm the crap out of new people entering FW. Those people leave. It makes it very hard to build a Euro TZ when those people have to enter being self sufficient killers. There is no room for error in that time zone.
Put tools in the LP store to help the losing side. I-HUB upgrades to slow plex spawns would be something I have suggested in the past.
Make kills move the contested bar in addition to plexes run. If we got credit for all the farmers in Sisiede we murdered we'd still own it!  I don't have a lot of hope that anything more then the first two points will be addressed.
to respond in order:
1) Unsure what you mean on this
2) They are trying. Its hard coded, but they are attempting to bring it on grid, like an module or a <250km effect (confirmed at FF)
3) Rewarding people for fighting poorly is not something CCP is accustomed to. While it may help the FW effort, without a FW/lowsec CSM don't expect to see this (or to see a balanced version)
4) Exploitable. At the FF roundtable it was declared that even if it was tied to the worth of a ship (like LP is now) that people would exploit.
I am unsure what the best path forward is for FW, but just here to drop some knowledge so that the debate can move forward with realistic ideas on teh table. Proud CEO of Heretic Army and loyal servent to Mother Amamake. COME AT ME BRO! Forums: http://forum.heretic-army.biz/index.php-á
Killboard: http://kb.heretic-army.biz/
Follow me on twitter @KarlPlanck |

Cosmo Raata
T-Cells Moar Tears
56
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 16:04:00 -
[239] - Quote
Gawd.
I swear, this CCP worship is getting out of control.
Here are some simple fixes that may be more appealing to the softer heart.
1) Remove sec hits from FW space so we can freely shoot anything, but still keep it low sec by not allowing Super capital stuff, bubbling, etc.
2) Gotta change beacon mechanics. Its dumb and if you don't agree with how it works, you're stupid. Yes, that is my argument at this point, tired of beating my head against a wall with some of you morons.
3) Provide more tools where we can find fights easier, space is big and so is FW space.
Better you bleeding heart CCP lovers? |

archon o'v
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
2
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 16:48:00 -
[240] - Quote
FW feels like a chick with fake boobs, looks and sounds good but there is no game to it |

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
920
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 17:38:00 -
[241] - Quote
ALUCARD 1208 wrote:had to do it but after cross matching both your boards cearain u still only managed ur prediction a 3-4 in over 4 years not every month like stated
I never claimed I received 100-150 solo kills every month from the first day I started eve. I was responding to crosi who claimed I am terrible at finding pvp. As in present tense, I am terrible.
I wasn't even subscribed the entire 4 years.
I am getting 100-150 solo kills now. Really even more since since it appears eve kill doesn't count a kill as a solo kill if a rat did zero damage on a ship. I was top damage on 173 kills in april and 148 kills in march. But I was playing quite a bit too much in april I admit. March was a more normal month.
Quitting faction war definitely increased my number of solo kills. After I quit faction war Cearaen went from about 15,000 bc rating to a bit over 4,000 in about 2 months. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
1358
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 18:04:00 -
[242] - Quote
Veshta Yoshida wrote:Taoist Dragon wrote:...There is nothing stopping you having the FW you want. Just get out there and make it happen rather than whine on the forums about it. Seriously the mechanics aren't the issue... So the fact that income and right to dock, both immensely important for non-Titan pew, is directly tied to risk-free alt farming activity is just something that can be ignored or worked around through :effort:? Pray tell, How? What is the FW you want (not the FW you want others to have)? I will do my best to tell you how to achieve your version of FW nirvana. |

Ristlin Wakefield
Rama Squadron Eternal Pretorian Alliance
308
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 18:06:00 -
[243] - Quote
Two things.
First, I like that CCP is focusing on exploration in this next expansion.
And the second thing I forgot, I'm having too much fun running around as a neutral in FW. I have a lover, her name is EVE. I see her every night and all she asks in return is that I have a pilot's license. |

ALUCARD 1208
Spiritus Draconis Sicarius Draconis
179
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 18:13:00 -
[244] - Quote
Cearain wrote:ALUCARD 1208 wrote:had to do it but after cross matching both your boards cearain u still only managed ur prediction a 3-4 in over 4 years not every month like stated I never claimed I received 100-150 solo kills every month from the first day I started eve. I was responding to crosi who claimed I am terrible at finding pvp. As in present tense, I am terrible. I wasn't even subscribed the entire 4 years. I am getting 100-150 solo kills now. Really even more since since it appears eve kill doesn't count a kill as a solo kill if a rat did zero damage on a ship.  I was top damage on 173 kills in april and 148 kills in march. But I was playing quite a bit too much in april I admit. March was a more normal month. Quitting faction war definitely increased my number of solo kills. After I quit faction war Cearaen went from about 15,000 bc rating to a bit over 4,000 in about 2 months.
Dood your a terrible lier at first u said i get this every month the text is there and then when me and xolve slap u for it, you backtrack and link another board with a smart arse caption of "ill let u in to a secret" and then link ur alts killboard too(never saying at this point not every month like ur original statement says)..... Usually we say alts kills dont count but i gave yopu the benefit of the doubt and ur numbers still didnt stack up GÖÑ HIGH FIVES GÖÑ-á |

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
920
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 18:16:00 -
[245] - Quote
Taoist Dragon wrote:Cosmo Raata wrote:
Sorry, but first we're not talking about a single sand grain on our cheesecake, but even if we did I dare wonder who of us still eats the cheesecake at a restaurant after discovering sand on it.
I think we fail to realize that we pay for CCP's livelihood and WE should determine when something isn't good enough and THEY should want to fix it when WE complain.
No wonder we let our politicians become corrupt in rl, we just let them do whatever they want to us in the name of "they do so much already for us".
So everytime someone cry's CCP should come and give us a hug and wipe our arses for us right?! The players for the most are the worst people to decide the way a game is developed generally. Sure there are few who have enough insite and general fortitude to actualy do the game some good but most are whiney crybabies who just want their stuff to be better than their opponents. CCP has a bigger picture view than 99% of the playerbase so they can keep it going for so long. Take look at how moany other mmo's have had such a long as Eve adn then think on why the other failed....a lot failed because the developers listened to all the tears and changed **** that they didn't understand to pander to some childish whiners. Balance is the key and Eve is getting better and better all the time with regards to this.
Thats just it. CCP has already said they would like to do notifications and timer rollbacks. They see the value of these proposals, even if a few vocal players who like having rabbit alts plex, don't.
It is just on a back burner. We just need to push them to get done what they already agree will be an improvement.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

ALUCARD 1208
Spiritus Draconis Sicarius Draconis
179
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 18:19:00 -
[246] - Quote
cearain wrote: Thats just it. CCP has already said they would like to do notifications
No they didnt as i said watch retribution round up of this years fanfest the dev says they had a notification system ready but yanked it cos its not in the essence of the sandbox..
From that i get if ccp adds a notification system. thats them adding something artificial and them interfearing in the sandbox
just out of interest where are you getting this info from that ccp are for notifications? maybe i missed that devblog/post/ GÖÑ HIGH FIVES GÖÑ-á |

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
920
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 18:30:00 -
[247] - Quote
ALUCARD 1208 wrote:Cearain wrote:ALUCARD 1208 wrote:had to do it but after cross matching both your boards cearain u still only managed ur prediction a 3-4 in over 4 years not every month like stated I never claimed I received 100-150 solo kills every month from the first day I started eve. I was responding to crosi who claimed I am terrible at finding pvp. As in present tense, I am terrible. I wasn't even subscribed the entire 4 years. I am getting 100-150 solo kills now. Really even more since since it appears eve kill doesn't count a kill as a solo kill if a rat did zero damage on a ship.  I was top damage on 173 kills in april and 148 kills in march. But I was playing quite a bit too much in april I admit. March was a more normal month. Quitting faction war definitely increased my number of solo kills. After I quit faction war Cearaen went from about 15,000 bc rating to a bit over 4,000 in about 2 months. Dood your a terrible lier at first u said i get this every month the text is there and then when me and xolve slap u for it, you backtrack and link another board with a smart arse caption of "ill let u in to a secret" and then link ur alts killboard too(never saying at this point not every month like ur original statement says)..... Usually we say alts kills dont count but i gave yopu the benefit of the doubt and ur numbers still didnt stack up
Wow you are really dense. Here was the exchange:
Crosi Wesdo wrote:Cearain wrote:... Also, you are terrible at finding pvp. As far as finding pvp. I get about 100-150 solo pvp kills a month. It could be better but Thats not too bad for the time I spend online.
Notice Crosi used the present tense. As in now I am terrible at finding pvp. He did not say I used to be terrible at pvp when I started 4 years ago.
Notice I also answered in the present tense saying "I get about 100-150 solo pvp kills per month." I never said "I got 100-150 solo pvp kills every month since I started eve." My activity levels in eve varies.
Plus like I said ccp ending gcc and allowing me to quit faction war greatly increased the amount of pvp I got.
Xolve played the buffoon because he assumed this was the only character I pvped with. Thats why he didn't show cearaen's kills. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

ALUCARD 1208
Spiritus Draconis Sicarius Draconis
179
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 18:40:00 -
[248] - Quote
Cearain wrote:Crosi Wesdo wrote:Cearain wrote:... Also, you are terrible at finding pvp. As far as finding pvp. I get about 100-150 solo pvp kills a month. It could be better but Thats not too bad for the time I spend online. Notice Crosi used the present tense. As in now I am terrible at finding pvp. He did not say I used to be terrible at pvp when I started 4 years ago. Notice I also answered in the present tense saying "I get about 100-150 solo pvp kills per month." I never said "I got 100-150 solo pvp kills every month since I started eve." My activity levels in eve varies.
I dont see crosi using any tense in that sentance he just says your bad at finding pvp its a generalisation meaning your bad at finding pvp full stop wether it be past or present.
And you never said past 2 months iv gotten 100-150 kills < this would be using present tense You said i get 100-150 a month meaning ... yes u got it a generalisation and also could be taken as something thats been ongoing GÖÑ HIGH FIVES GÖÑ-á |

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
920
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 18:41:00 -
[249] - Quote
ALUCARD 1208 wrote:cearain wrote: Thats just it. CCP has already said they would like to do notifications
No they didnt as i said watch retribution round up of this years fanfest the dev says they had a notification system ready but yanked it cos its not in the essence of the sandbox.. From that i get if ccp adds a notification system. thats them adding something artificial and them interfearing in the sandbox just out of interest where are you getting this info from that ccp are for notifications? maybe i missed that devblog/post/
I wasn't aware of that.
Can you supply a link?
Here is a link where the devs are favorable to the idea of better intel tools. The devs gave a different explanation on these forums of why notifications were left out.
http://www.eve-search.com/thread/107405-1/page/6#178
"Q: LET'S GET BETTER NOTIFICATION/INTEL TOOLS WITH SYSTEM UPGRADES MR. HOLMES! A: Interesting argument Dr. Watson. More water Sir? We definitely agree having better notification tools should be part of the whole package, but it should maybe be independent of Factional Warfare and something you need in all cases. After all, Starbase, corporation, war declaration notifications also need love too, let's not be selfish here. Such revamp is in the pipeline, even not for immediate release. Better intel tools for system upgrades however is definitely something we are thinking about." CCP Ytterbium
If what you say is accurate and came after this, then that is really too bad. It suggests they are fine with the current rabbit plexing mechanics. Perhaps that is why they left timer rollbacks out as well. Is the "essence of their sandbox" risk averse pve?
I guess we need to know if ccp devs think the current rabbit plexing system is working as intended or not. Should the top vp gainers for the day all have no kills for that day? Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
920
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 18:43:00 -
[250] - Quote
ALUCARD 1208 wrote:Cearain wrote:Crosi Wesdo wrote:Cearain wrote:... Also, you are terrible at finding pvp. As far as finding pvp. I get about 100-150 solo pvp kills a month. It could be better but Thats not too bad for the time I spend online. Notice Crosi used the present tense. As in now I am terrible at finding pvp. He did not say I used to be terrible at pvp when I started 4 years ago. Notice I also answered in the present tense saying "I get about 100-150 solo pvp kills per month." I never said "I got 100-150 solo pvp kills every month since I started eve." My activity levels in eve varies. I dont see crosi using any tense in that sentance ....
I see the problem. You literally don't understand English. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

ALUCARD 1208
Spiritus Draconis Sicarius Draconis
179
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 18:50:00 -
[251] - Quote
http://www.twitch.tv/ccp/c/2203972 here is the link its either in the bit that he shows a graph of what didnt get in or in the QA at the end
In the link you posted he doesnt speak specifically on fw notifications but all notifications saying they needed sprucing up he even gos as far as saying it runs independant of FW..
Also yes there proud of retribution esp 1.1 when they removed tier spikes and stuff its all over most of the dev vids from fanfest....
Now for my grasp of english after re reading what crosi says there is no tense at all hes stating an opinion that your bad at finding pvp full stop(meaning youve always been bad past or present) and never once does he say elatly of recently your bad at finding pvp. GÖÑ HIGH FIVES GÖÑ-á |

Voi Lutois
The Tough Guys
36
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 20:02:00 -
[252] - Quote
http://www.wikihow.com/Use-You%27re-and-Your |

Maximus Hashur
Vanus Technical Solutions Corp Covert Intervention
58
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 20:06:00 -
[253] - Quote
After reading everything, im thinking - who cares at this point?
If FW stays exactly the way it is right now - who cares? Its a means to find PvP and have a constant enemy to war with.
Enaluri goes to Caldari, then gets taken back by Gallente. Immuri gets taken by Min then goes back to Amarr.
It truly doesnt matter if you step back and put FW in perspective.
Its a good place to find regular fights and have fun. Let the farmers farm. Someone warps out on you, go to the next plex or system and find someone else to engage. Trust me there are plenty of people to fight.
And if you really cant stomach how the FW game is, move on to something else. Looked up...saw this F***ING clown dropping like a rock.-á Woke up in Vylade wondering what just happened!!! |

Cosmo Raata
T-Cells Moar Tears
56
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 21:05:00 -
[254] - Quote
Maximus Hashur wrote:After reading everything, im thinking - who cares at this point?
If FW stays exactly the way it is right now - who cares? Its a means to find PvP and have a constant enemy to war with.
Enaluri goes to Caldari, then gets taken back by Gallente. Immuri gets taken by Min then goes back to Amarr.
It truly doesnt matter if you step back and put FW in perspective.
Its a good place to find regular fights and have fun. Let the farmers farm. Someone warps out on you, go to the next plex or system and find someone else to engage. Trust me there are plenty of people to fight.
And if you really cant stomach how the FW game is, move on to something else.
Problem is most of us are tired of moving onto something else as nothing is working "well".
Null = broken Empire wars = broken FW = broken
Where else can we find lots of consensual pvp?
Null = stay docked, they move on Empire wars = Barely consensual and pretty pathetic now FW = Plex wars
Perhaps if you suggest something, i'd actually give up as you suggest and try that instead. |

Taoist Dragon
Bastion of Mad Behaviour Caldari State Capturing
420
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 21:06:00 -
[255] - Quote
Cosmo Raata wrote:Gawd.
I swear, this CCP worship is getting out of control.
Here are some simple fixes that may be more appealing to the softer heart.
1) Remove sec hits from FW space so we can freely shoot anything, but still keep it low sec by not allowing Super capital stuff, bubbling, etc.
2) Gotta change beacon mechanics. Its dumb and if you don't agree with how it works, you're stupid. Yes, that is my argument at this point, tired of beating my head against a wall with some of you morons.
3) Provide more tools where we can find fights easier, space is big and so is FW space.
Better you bleeding heart CCP lovers?
What CCP worship? They are doing a good job of handling probably the most complex MMO out there to date.
1) Why? are FW's special in that they need more hand holding. HTFU.
2) Whats broken about beacon mechanics? They have been like this for a while and it's only really the FW'ers whining about them. The rest of eve just gets on with it as they work fine.
3) Man you just bloody lazy? Go find stuff for yourself and stop expecting everything on a plate!
Come back when you have actual constuctive ideas with well thought out arguements for the proposed ideas.
Thank you for reading this freindly service anouncement by the TaoBot 1337.  That is the Way, the Tao.
Balance is everything. |

Taoist Dragon
Bastion of Mad Behaviour Caldari State Capturing
422
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 21:19:00 -
[256] - Quote
Cosmo Raata wrote:Maximus Hashur wrote:After reading everything, im thinking - who cares at this point?
If FW stays exactly the way it is right now - who cares? Its a means to find PvP and have a constant enemy to war with.
Enaluri goes to Caldari, then gets taken back by Gallente. Immuri gets taken by Min then goes back to Amarr.
It truly doesnt matter if you step back and put FW in perspective.
Its a good place to find regular fights and have fun. Let the farmers farm. Someone warps out on you, go to the next plex or system and find someone else to engage. Trust me there are plenty of people to fight.
And if you really cant stomach how the FW game is, move on to something else. Problem is most of us are tired of moving onto something else as nothing is working "well". Null = broken Empire wars = broken FW = broken Where else can we find lots of consensual pvp? Null = stay docked, they move on Empire wars = Barely consensual and pretty pathetic now FW = Plex wars Perhaps if you suggest something, i'd actually give up as you suggest and try that instead.
Cosmo mate it sounds as if you are getting burnt out mate.
Take a little break and clear your head form eve **** for a short while. Eve is unlike all other mmo's as it really can drive beep into your psyche and totally screw you over.
Take a break, go play some other stuff and clear yer head.
Then come back and if eve still flicks that special switch for you make it what YOU want it to be.
Eve is not 'broken' per say but you may need to reset your relationship with it, if you get my meaning. That is the Way, the Tao.
Balance is everything. |

GavinGoodrich
State Protectorate Caldari State
30
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 21:32:00 -
[257] - Quote
Taoist Dragon wrote:
Cosmo mate it sounds as if you are getting burnt out mate.
Take a little break and clear your head form eve **** for a short while. Eve is unlike all other mmo's as it really can drive beep into your psyche and totally screw you over.
Take a break, go play some other stuff and clear yer head.
Then come back and if eve still flicks that special switch for you make it what YOU want it to be.
Eve is not 'broken' per say but you may need to reset your relationship with it, if you get my meaning.
Trying this myself. Trying to keep the "fun" in perspective here when we have so many small groups spread out all over and it's difficult to get the big roaming fleets of yesterdecade out and about , and they don't wanna consolidate :(
Just popping in to say hi is keeping the stress out of it, but yeah trying hard to avoid the stressful organizational cat herding aspect of FW. |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
578
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 22:33:00 -
[258] - Quote
GavinGoodrich wrote:Taoist Dragon wrote:
Cosmo mate it sounds as if you are getting burnt out mate.
Take a little break and clear your head form eve **** for a short while. Eve is unlike all other mmo's as it really can drive beep into your psyche and totally screw you over.
Take a break, go play some other stuff and clear yer head.
Then come back and if eve still flicks that special switch for you make it what YOU want it to be.
Eve is not 'broken' per say but you may need to reset your relationship with it, if you get my meaning.
Trying this myself. Trying to keep the "fun" in perspective here when we have so many small groups spread out all over and it's difficult to get the big roaming fleets of yesterdecade out and about , and they don't wanna consolidate :( Just popping in to say hi is keeping the stress out of it, but yeah trying hard to avoid the stressful organizational cat herding aspect of FW.
Unfortunately there is no productive value in large fleets in fw. People have harped on about small gang and solo pvp for years and how its dead. This iteration of FW comes along delivering exactly that and the same people who were whining about the lack solo and small gang are still whining (not aimed at you GG).
Just that consistent fraction of people who enjoy whining like babies about things they will never get, that arnt constructive or even possible given that this game is played by people and you cant make them do what they dont want to.
Big gangs really have no place in FW mechanics. However, if you want to start RF'ing some towers/POCO's to see what you can stir up, thats pretty much where your fleet warfare should exist.
As for cretin, whatever hes called, if i block him in game, do his posts also vanish? |

ALUCARD 1208
Spiritus Draconis Sicarius Draconis
180
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 22:39:00 -
[259] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:
As for cretin, whatever hes called, if i block him in game, do his posts also vanish?
Hahaha you can click his name on this thread and hide posts think that wipes out them all ;)
GÖÑ HIGH FIVES GÖÑ-á |

Rual Storge
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
8
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 22:40:00 -
[260] - Quote
This FW? What is this? I dont know this?
|

Cosmo Raata
T-Cells Moar Tears
58
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 23:00:00 -
[261] - Quote
Taoist Dragon wrote:Cosmo Raata wrote:Maximus Hashur wrote:After reading everything, im thinking - who cares at this point?
If FW stays exactly the way it is right now - who cares? Its a means to find PvP and have a constant enemy to war with.
Enaluri goes to Caldari, then gets taken back by Gallente. Immuri gets taken by Min then goes back to Amarr.
It truly doesnt matter if you step back and put FW in perspective.
Its a good place to find regular fights and have fun. Let the farmers farm. Someone warps out on you, go to the next plex or system and find someone else to engage. Trust me there are plenty of people to fight.
And if you really cant stomach how the FW game is, move on to something else. Problem is most of us are tired of moving onto something else as nothing is working "well". Null = broken Empire wars = broken FW = broken Where else can we find lots of consensual pvp? Null = stay docked, they move on Empire wars = Barely consensual and pretty pathetic now FW = Plex wars Perhaps if you suggest something, i'd actually give up as you suggest and try that instead. Cosmo mate it sounds as if you are getting burnt out mate. Take a little break and clear your head form eve **** for a short while. Eve is unlike all other mmo's as it really can drive beep into your psyche and totally screw you over. Take a break, go play some other stuff and clear yer head. Then come back and if eve still flicks that special switch for you make it what YOU want it to be. Eve is not 'broken' per say but you may need to reset your relationship with it, if you get my meaning.
I did take a break Bro, almost a year I've been inactive. Came back to the same half assed system I left and still look around at options and see PvP still a shadow of its former self everywhere I look.
|

Cosmo Raata
T-Cells Moar Tears
58
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 23:05:00 -
[262] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:GavinGoodrich wrote:Taoist Dragon wrote:
Cosmo mate it sounds as if you are getting burnt out mate.
Take a little break and clear your head form eve **** for a short while. Eve is unlike all other mmo's as it really can drive beep into your psyche and totally screw you over.
Take a break, go play some other stuff and clear yer head.
Then come back and if eve still flicks that special switch for you make it what YOU want it to be.
Eve is not 'broken' per say but you may need to reset your relationship with it, if you get my meaning.
Trying this myself. Trying to keep the "fun" in perspective here when we have so many small groups spread out all over and it's difficult to get the big roaming fleets of yesterdecade out and about , and they don't wanna consolidate :( Just popping in to say hi is keeping the stress out of it, but yeah trying hard to avoid the stressful organizational cat herding aspect of FW. Unfortunately there is no productive value in large fleets in fw. People have harped on about small gang and solo pvp for years and how its dead. This iteration of FW comes along delivering exactly that and the same people who were whining about the lack solo and small gang are still whining (not aimed at you GG). Just that consistent fraction of people who enjoy whining like babies about things they will never get, that arnt constructive or even possible given that this game is played by people and you cant make them do what they dont want to. Big gangs really have no place in FW mechanics. However, if you want to start RF'ing some towers/POCO's to see what you can stir up, thats pretty much where your fleet warfare should exist. As for cretin, whatever hes called, if i block him in game, do his posts also vanish?
There is a huge difference between Big gangs and Null Sec super gangs. FW should have up to 100vs100 on occasion, which really isn't that big. Most fights should be between 10-50. Solo pvp doesn't happen much mostly due to people worrying about booster alts and corp mates showing up mid fight. Small gang happens in FW but its so tedious to find a fight that its almost not worth forming up. You're ignored as you fly through space or out blobbed.
But again, the biggest issue about FW isn't that we can't find pvp, its that it is so beacon-centric that it begs the question why anyone really needs the pvp to do FW. Answer is you don't have to, which is stupid.
|

Mr Turing
Fweddit I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
0
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 23:22:00 -
[263] - Quote
I am Mr Turing and I approve of this thread. |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
1358
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 23:22:00 -
[264] - Quote
Yeah it must suck that you can't find 100 v 100 in low sec anywhere. Sucks to be you I guess. |

GavinGoodrich
State Protectorate Caldari State
31
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 23:31:00 -
[265] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote: Unfortunately there is no productive value in large fleets in fw....
Big gangs really have no place in FW mechanics. However, if you want to start RF'ing some towers/POCO's to see what you can stir up, thats pretty much where your fleet warfare should exist.
Yeah you probably have a point there. |

Taoist Dragon
Bastion of Mad Behaviour Caldari State Capturing
424
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 23:54:00 -
[266] - Quote
Cosmo Raata wrote:
I did take a break Bro, almost a year I've been inactive. Came back to the same half assed system I left and still look around at options and see PvP still a shadow of its former self everywhere I look.
Sorry to hear this mate.
Maybe you need to move out of FW for a bit and see if you can get what you want out in NPC null or whatever. Explore a bit. Try different things and see if you can get that spark back. If not then you've probably outgrown eve and your needs have changed to something eve can't delivery. If that is the case then vOv sorry to see you go but GL on whatever you move onto. That is the Way, the Tao.
Balance is everything. |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
579
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 23:56:00 -
[267] - Quote
Cosmo Raata wrote: There is a huge difference between Big gangs and Null Sec super gangs. FW should have up to 100vs100 on occasion, which really isn't that big. Most fights should be between 10-50. Solo pvp doesn't happen much mostly due to people worrying about booster alts and corp mates showing up mid fight. Small gang happens in FW but its so tedious to find a fight that its almost not worth forming up. You're ignored as you fly through space or out blobbed.
But again, the biggest issue about FW isn't that we can't find pvp, its that it is so beacon-centric that it begs the question why anyone really needs the pvp to do FW. Answer is you don't have to, which is stupid.
You dont need several 250 man fleets to rf a POCO in low sec. Some of the largest fights ive ever had have been over pocos and towers in low sec.
Gather your intel, pick your target and be ready for what they can bring.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9go9709LZVw a recent(ish) example. Though that turned out to be a gank, cant make people fight.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U7AOyDFzzng being a relatively huge fight over a POCO in low sec. But still not really anywhere near null sov fiascos.
As for solo, i have a booster alt and i get people to engage all the time. Trick is to not give them much of a choice. |

Cosmo Raata
T-Cells Moar Tears
58
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 00:48:00 -
[268] - Quote
Taoist Dragon wrote:Cosmo Raata wrote:
I did take a break Bro, almost a year I've been inactive. Came back to the same half assed system I left and still look around at options and see PvP still a shadow of its former self everywhere I look.
Sorry to hear this mate. Maybe you need to move out of FW for a bit and see if you can get what you want out in NPC null or whatever. Explore a bit. Try different things and see if you can get that spark back. If not then you've probably outgrown eve and your needs have changed to something eve can't delivery. If that is the case then vOv sorry to see you go but GL on whatever you move onto.
Enough of your banter, stfu & go find another thread to troll.
I swear, some people need to get a life. |

Taoist Dragon
Bastion of Mad Behaviour Caldari State Capturing
424
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 01:02:00 -
[269] - Quote
Cosmo Raata wrote:Taoist Dragon wrote:Cosmo Raata wrote:
I did take a break Bro, almost a year I've been inactive. Came back to the same half assed system I left and still look around at options and see PvP still a shadow of its former self everywhere I look.
Sorry to hear this mate. Maybe you need to move out of FW for a bit and see if you can get what you want out in NPC null or whatever. Explore a bit. Try different things and see if you can get that spark back. If not then you've probably outgrown eve and your needs have changed to something eve can't delivery. If that is the case then vOv sorry to see you go but GL on whatever you move onto. Enough of your banter, stfu & go find another thread to troll. I swear, some people need to get a life.
Well I was actually trying to empathise with you but seeing as you are being a prick then get screwed 
Keep crying and sounding like a baby all you want. o7 That is the Way, the Tao.
Balance is everything. |

1st-Garrentious WispBender
Federal Defense Union Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 01:24:00 -
[270] - Quote
It is really about time CCP buffed the Gallente. It isn't easy fighting the obviously superior Caldari ships, I as a Gallente player admit the obvious bias. |

Cosmo Raata
T-Cells Moar Tears
58
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 02:33:00 -
[271] - Quote
Taoist Dragon wrote:Cosmo Raata wrote:Taoist Dragon wrote:Cosmo Raata wrote:
I did take a break Bro, almost a year I've been inactive. Came back to the same half assed system I left and still look around at options and see PvP still a shadow of its former self everywhere I look.
Sorry to hear this mate. Maybe you need to move out of FW for a bit and see if you can get what you want out in NPC null or whatever. Explore a bit. Try different things and see if you can get that spark back. If not then you've probably outgrown eve and your needs have changed to something eve can't delivery. If that is the case then vOv sorry to see you go but GL on whatever you move onto. Enough of your banter, stfu & go find another thread to troll. I swear, some people need to get a life. Well I was actually trying to empathise with you but seeing as you are being a prick then get screwed  Keep crying and sounding like a baby all you want. o7
Again, shut up. Don't need you to empathize with me, you're an alt claiming old player with terrible pvp stats who flies in t1 frigs, how could you possibly empathize?
I'll do you a favor, I'll have sympathy for you since you're a brown nosing ignoramus. |

Taoist Dragon
Bastion of Mad Behaviour Caldari State Capturing
424
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 03:27:00 -
[272] - Quote
Cosmo Raata wrote:
Again, shut up. Don't need you to empathize with me, you're an alt claiming old player with terrible pvp stats who flies in t1 frigs, how could you possibly empathize?
I'll do you a favor, I'll have sympathy for you since you're a brown nosing ignoramus.
LOL
And you are who exactly again? That is the Way, the Tao.
Balance is everything. |

IbanezLaney
The Church of Awesome Caldari State Capturing
350
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 04:44:00 -
[273] - Quote
Taoist Dragon wrote:Cosmo Raata wrote:
Again, shut up. Don't need you to empathize with me, you're an alt claiming old player with terrible pvp stats who flies in t1 frigs, how could you possibly empathize?
I'll do you a favor, I'll have sympathy for you since you're a brown nosing ignoramus.
LOL And you are who exactly again?
Are you upsetting the spazzos again Tao????
Fix this **** See Sea Pea. |

1st-Garrentious WispBender
Federal Defense Union Gallente Federation
5
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 04:45:00 -
[274] - Quote
Taoist Dragon wrote:Cosmo Raata wrote:
Again, shut up. Don't need you to empathize with me, you're an alt claiming old player with terrible pvp stats who flies in t1 frigs, how could you possibly empathize?
I'll do you a favor, I'll have sympathy for you since you're a brown nosing ignoramus.
LOL And you are who exactly again?
You all know who I am. |

Taoist Dragon
Bastion of Mad Behaviour Caldari State Capturing
424
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 05:36:00 -
[275] - Quote
IbanezLaney wrote:Taoist Dragon wrote:Cosmo Raata wrote:
Again, shut up. Don't need you to empathize with me, you're an alt claiming old player with terrible pvp stats who flies in t1 frigs, how could you possibly empathize?
I'll do you a favor, I'll have sympathy for you since you're a brown nosing ignoramus.
LOL And you are who exactly again? Are you upsetting the spazzos again Tao????
Yup  That is the Way, the Tao.
Balance is everything. |

ALUCARD 1208
Spiritus Draconis Sicarius Draconis
180
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 13:52:00 -
[276] - Quote
Humm is that irony from cosmo his corps no more tears but this threads filled with his tears  GÖÑ HIGH FIVES GÖÑ-á |

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
921
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 13:56:00 -
[277] - Quote
Alucard You are the least credible person to post on any forum I have ever visited. Literally everything you say is wrong. I suspect you know this and are just here to troll and lie.
ALUCARD 1208 wrote:http://www.twitch.tv/ccp/c/2203972 here is the link its either in the bit that he shows a graph of what didnt get in or in the QA at the end. I scanned through it. I found something that contradicts what you claim. Specifically In that talk at minute 24:50 he talks about how the better intel for faction war was scrapped due to time constraints.
Your claim that "they had a notification system ready but yanked it cos its not in the essence of the sandbox" was not to be found. Can you give me the place where this was said?
ALUCARD 1208 wrote: In the link you posted he doesnt speak specifically on fw notifications but all notifications saying they needed sprucing up he even gos as far as saying it runs independant of FW.. .
The thread he posted it in was called: "Sticky:FW: I-hub and system upgrades"
And yes it is specifically refering to faction war notifications as part of upgrading a system. Hans told me he was pushing for that so I would assume it was addressed. He said what I quoted from him, not what you wrote. Thats why I gave the quote so people could see exactly what he said. Go ahead and read the quote it is refering to notifications as a fw upgrade.
ALUCARD 1208 wrote: Also yes there proud of retribution esp 1.1 when they removed tier spikes and stuff its all over most of the dev vids from fanfest....
Thats not the issue we are discussing.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Cosmo Raata
No Moar Tears I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
58
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 14:01:00 -
[278] - Quote
ALUCARD 1208 wrote:Humm is that irony from cosmo his corps no more tears but this threads filled with his tears 
We just made this corp, our alliance was Moar Tears, but because CCP ruined empire war dec stuff we came to factional warfare and because FW hasn't been amazing we have lost members; they either quit the game all together or are trying other things now. So it was fitting that was called it No Moar Tears......Thanks Obama......errrr CCP. |

Cosmo Raata
No Moar Tears I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
58
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 14:04:00 -
[279] - Quote
Taoist Dragon wrote:Cosmo Raata wrote:
Again, shut up. Don't need you to empathize with me, you're an alt claiming old player with terrible pvp stats who flies in t1 frigs, how could you possibly empathize?
I'll do you a favor, I'll have sympathy for you since you're a brown nosing ignoramus.
LOL And you are who exactly again?
Not a forum warrior with little in game notoriety. |

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
921
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 14:11:00 -
[280] - Quote
Maximus Hashur wrote:After reading everything, im thinking - who cares at this point?
If FW stays exactly the way it is right now - who cares? Its a means to find PvP and have a constant enemy to war with.
Enaluri goes to Caldari, then gets taken back by Gallente. Immuri gets taken by Min then goes back to Amarr.
It truly doesnt matter if you step back and put FW in perspective.
Its a good place to find regular fights and have fun. Let the farmers farm. Someone warps out on you, go to the next plex or system and find someone else to engage. Trust me there are plenty of people to fight.
And if you really cant stomach how the FW game is, move on to something else.
The random rvb style pvp is really great in faction war. I do agree. The increase in great plex fights is very welcome.
But this random rvb style pvp with no back story and no overarching goals can get stale.
The reason I care is because fw is so close. The developers even planned on doing the things that would make fw great (intel tools and rollbacks) but they stopped just a few inches from the finish line, and left it a system where pve decides sov in 90% of systems.
Having a system where people are actually "fighting" for sov throughout the warzone, instead of carebearing for sov, would be so much better.
I don't entirely blame ccp. It seems our own csm rep put more emphasis on how and when lp was paid out than making sov warfare a pvp mechanic. And to a large extent he was listening to the new carebear minded players who instantly became attracted to the new lp fountain - called fw.
But whatever. The bottom line is this:
Is Sov in over 90% of systems supposed to be determined by carebears?
If it is then yes fw is working as intended.
If not then hopefully ccp will do the things that they initially intended to do and left off of retribution. Namely better intel tools about plexes being taken and timer rollbacks.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
579
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 14:24:00 -
[281] - Quote
Cearain wrote:Maximus Hashur wrote:After reading everything, im thinking - who cares at this point?
If FW stays exactly the way it is right now - who cares? Its a means to find PvP and have a constant enemy to war with.
Enaluri goes to Caldari, then gets taken back by Gallente. Immuri gets taken by Min then goes back to Amarr.
It truly doesnt matter if you step back and put FW in perspective.
Its a good place to find regular fights and have fun. Let the farmers farm. Someone warps out on you, go to the next plex or system and find someone else to engage. Trust me there are plenty of people to fight.
And if you really cant stomach how the FW game is, move on to something else. The random rvb style pvp is really great in faction war. I do agree. The increase in great plex fights is very welcome. But this random rvb style pvp with no back story and no overarching goals can get stale. The reason I care is because fw is so close. The developers even planned on doing the things that would make fw great (intel tools and rollbacks) but they stopped just a few inches from the finish line, and left it a system where pve decides sov in 90% of systems. Having a system where people are actually "fighting" for sov throughout the warzone, instead of carebearing for sov, would be so much better. I don't entirely blame ccp. It seems our own csm rep put more emphasis on how and when lp was paid out than making sov warfare a pvp mechanic. And to a large extent he was listening to the new carebear minded players who instantly became attracted to the new lp fountain - called fw. But whatever. The bottom line is this: Is Sov in over 90% of systems supposed to be determined by carebears? If it is then yes fw is working as intended. If not then hopefully ccp will do the things that they initially intended to do and left off of retribution. Namely better intel tools about plexes being taken and timer rollbacks.
Sov is part the environment in FW so by definition sov is a pvE game and necessarily so. people know where farmers are but dont go there because there is no fight to be had. For the last time, notifications will never change that. Finding farmers is not the problem with farming. The notifications at best will provide is a tool for farmers to effiiently steal LP from each other (and pvp'ers) |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
1359
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 14:25:00 -
[282] - Quote
Cearain wrote: But this rvb style pvp with no back story and no overarching goals can get stale. With no connection to sov its just too random. And even now you can hit dry spells where you spend an hour warping around with little action.
Only you can set overarching goals in Eve. It's a sandbox, afterall.
And don't give me this "other parts of eve have overarching goals" BS. If you don't think FW has an overarching goal, then you must think there is no overarching goal in Eve.
|

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
922
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 14:37:00 -
[283] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote: But this rvb style pvp with no back story and no overarching goals can get stale. With no connection to sov its just too random. And even now you can hit dry spells where you spend an hour warping around with little action.
Only you can set overarching goals in Eve. It's a sandbox, afterall. And don't give me this "other parts of eve have overarching goals" BS. If you don't think FW has an overarching goal, then you must think there is no overarching goal in Eve.
The overarching goal in faction war is to win sov for your militia. You implicitly agreed to this when you said you won faction war when gallente took all the systems.
Maximus Hashur basically said who cares if all the systems are taken by rabbits, we still get a bunch of pvp. So my post was a response to that. I pointed out that when you remove the pvp from the actual overarching goal of winning sov you just get random rvb style pvp. A sand box does not mean there can be no bigger picture goals to achieve in the game.
Of course anyone can make believe their own goals, but some goals are actually built into the game - like sov and tiers etc. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
922
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 14:40:00 -
[284] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:Cearain wrote:Maximus Hashur wrote:After reading everything, im thinking - who cares at this point?
If FW stays exactly the way it is right now - who cares? Its a means to find PvP and have a constant enemy to war with.
Enaluri goes to Caldari, then gets taken back by Gallente. Immuri gets taken by Min then goes back to Amarr.
It truly doesnt matter if you step back and put FW in perspective.
Its a good place to find regular fights and have fun. Let the farmers farm. Someone warps out on you, go to the next plex or system and find someone else to engage. Trust me there are plenty of people to fight.
And if you really cant stomach how the FW game is, move on to something else. The random rvb style pvp is really great in faction war. I do agree. The increase in great plex fights is very welcome. But this random rvb style pvp with no back story and no overarching goals can get stale. The reason I care is because fw is so close. The developers even planned on doing the things that would make fw great (intel tools and rollbacks) but they stopped just a few inches from the finish line, and left it a system where pve decides sov in 90% of systems. Having a system where people are actually "fighting" for sov throughout the warzone, instead of carebearing for sov, would be so much better. I don't entirely blame ccp. It seems our own csm rep put more emphasis on how and when lp was paid out than making sov warfare a pvp mechanic. And to a large extent he was listening to the new carebear minded players who instantly became attracted to the new lp fountain - called fw. But whatever. The bottom line is this: Is Sov in over 90% of systems supposed to be determined by carebears? If it is then yes fw is working as intended. If not then hopefully ccp will do the things that they initially intended to do and left off of retribution. Namely better intel tools about plexes being taken and timer rollbacks. Sov is part the environment in FW so by definition sov is a pvE game and necessarily so. people know where farmers are but dont go there because there is no fight to be had. For the last time, notifications will never change that. Finding farmers is not the problem with farming. The notifications at best will provide is a tool for farmers to effiiently steal LP from each other (and pvp'ers)
Ah this argument again. No the notifications would help people remove those who ***** others lp. Because if someone is a confirmed thief the main alliances could list them as people everyone should ***** lp from, and the notifications would help them ***** the lp from them.
Bottom line is better intel tools means more of the war is in the players control.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
1359
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 14:40:00 -
[285] - Quote
Cearain wrote:Cearain wrote: But this rvb style pvp with no back story and no overarching goals can get stale.
The overarching goal in faction war is to win sov for your militia. So you are saying FW has overarching goals, but in the previous post you said it didn't? Please clarify.
I'll rephrase to make my point clear. Only YOU can decide what your overarching goal is in Eve, the game can't do it for you. |

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
922
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 15:04:00 -
[286] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:Cearain wrote: But this rvb style pvp with no back story and no overarching goals can get stale.
The overarching goal in faction war is to win sov for your militia. So you are saying FW has overarching goals, but in the previous post you said it didn't? Please clarify.
That is the goal but I was responding to Maximus who was saying "who cares" about it. In essence he was saying pretend it doesn't exist and just enjoy the random pvp we are getting. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

ALUCARD 1208
Spiritus Draconis Sicarius Draconis
180
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 15:06:00 -
[287] - Quote
Cearain wrote:X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:Cearain wrote: But this rvb style pvp with no back story and no overarching goals can get stale.
The overarching goal in faction war is to win sov for your militia. So you are saying FW has overarching goals, but in the previous post you said it didn't? Please clarify. In essence he was saying pretend it doesn't exist and just enjoy the random pvp we are getting.
Which should be easy for you your not in fw so it not a problem that really exist for you. unless im missing something here?
And i agree just enjoy the pvp like everyone else because all said and done a better sov mechanic would be nice if it forced fights but enjoy the ones you are getting in abundance atm GÖÑ HIGH FIVES GÖÑ-á |

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
922
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 15:14:00 -
[288] - Quote
ALUCARD 1208 wrote:Cearain wrote:X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:Cearain wrote: But this rvb style pvp with no back story and no overarching goals can get stale.
The overarching goal in faction war is to win sov for your militia. So you are saying FW has overarching goals, but in the previous post you said it didn't? Please clarify. In essence he was saying pretend it doesn't exist and just enjoy the random pvp we are getting. Which should be easy for you your not in fw so it not a problem that really exist for you. unless im missing something here? And i agree just enjoy the pvp like everyone else because all said and done a better sov mechanic would be nice if it forced fights but enjoy the ones you are getting in abundance atm
I agree that the sov mechanic is currently so broken it might as well be ignored. But when you ignore it and just go for random pvp in plexes then you realize you will get allot more fights if you are not blue to a substantial number of pvpers you see in plexes.
So why be in fw at all if you are going to ignore sov and your not interested in carebearing lp? Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

ALUCARD 1208
Spiritus Draconis Sicarius Draconis
180
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 15:20:00 -
[289] - Quote
I like the wartargets we fight and i do have alot of friends in gal/minnie militia what iv made over the years i can find enough fights without having to kill/lose **** to these guys and if wartargets arnt up for a fight theres always local pirates to which theres plenty in our space. I like the social aspect of the Faction warfare something i dont think you like as you emphasise on your kills being solo. GÖÑ HIGH FIVES GÖÑ-á |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
1359
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 15:35:00 -
[290] - Quote
Cearain wrote:X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:Cearain wrote:But this rvb style pvp with no back story and no overarching goals can get stale. The overarching goal in faction war is to win sov for your militia. So you are saying FW has overarching goals, but in the previous post you said it didn't? Please clarify. That is the goal but I was responding to Maximus who was saying "who cares" about it. In essence he was saying pretend it doesn't exist and just enjoy the random pvp we are getting. His choice. Yours too. |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
579
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 16:01:00 -
[291] - Quote
Cearain wrote:
Ah this argument again. No the notifications would help people remove those who ***** others lp. Because if someone is a confirmed thief the main alliances could list them as people everyone should ***** lp from, and the notifications would help them ***** the lp from them.
Bottom line is better intel tools means more of the war is in the players control.
Only farmers care about stealing LP. No one else is going to go out of their way to do it. |

Muad 'dib
The Imperial Fedaykin Amarrian Commandos
920
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 16:07:00 -
[292] - Quote
Lets just pretend there are no pvpers on the farming side.
Even if the pvpers could kill all the farmers they are losing to, who is going to counter-farm for a fraction of the money they could get compared to just jumping on the bandwagon?
nah leave the counter-farm to the pvpers too? yeah sweet plan.
Cosmic signature detected. . . . http://img299.imageshack.us/img299/4375/mynewsig2.jpg CCP Hilmar CEO > "why am i sweating, why is the game doing this to me"
|

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
922
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 16:13:00 -
[293] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:Cearain wrote:But this rvb style pvp with no back story and no overarching goals can get stale. The overarching goal in faction war is to win sov for your militia. So you are saying FW has overarching goals, but in the previous post you said it didn't? Please clarify. That is the goal but I was responding to Maximus who was saying "who cares" about it. In essence he was saying pretend it doesn't exist and just enjoy the random pvp we are getting. His choice. Yours too.
Its a pretty easy to choice to make when the overarching goal of gaining sov is a broken carebear race. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
922
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 16:19:00 -
[294] - Quote
ALUCARD 1208 wrote:Cearain wrote:ALUCARD 1208 wrote: On that fanfest link i posted for you they mentioned it was a mess before the changes and now its at something there happy with.
Oh you mean the link that proved you lied about what CCP said? huh did u even watch it at all? Your whiney posts even went from CCP wants to do this to they planned to but didnt :( sad panda
At 24:50 he said they simply had time constraints so didn't add it. I gave you a link were ccp said they wanted a notification systems or at least better intel tools. Its earlier in this thread as well.
ALUCARD 1208 wrote:cearain wrote: Thats just it. CCP has already said they would like to do notifications
No they didnt as i said watch retribution round up of this years fanfest the dev says they had a notification system ready but yanked it cos its not in the essence of the sandbox..
Please give the point in the talk where the dev said this. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
1359
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 16:32:00 -
[295] - Quote
Cearain wrote:Its a pretty easy to choice to make when the overarching goal of gaining sov is a broken carebear race. Would you like to rephrase that sentence? |

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
922
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 16:40:00 -
[296] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:It's a pretty easy choice to make when the overarching goal of gaining sov is a broken carebear race. Would you like to rephrase that sentence?
Yes but you already quoted it so its too late. 
I would rephrase it like above. Still not good, but better.
Did you see the video at the link Alucard posted? Did the dev say what Alucard claimed? If so where? Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Cosmo Raata
No Moar Tears I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
58
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 17:11:00 -
[297] - Quote
Why are the few people who are arguing against reform either not in FW or basically solo players who are farmers of LP in the first place.
Also, those who want the status quo keep asking for proof or specific quotes or real data to prove our argument right, yet they provide none and when we find some they ignore it or pick it apart.
I think its time to ignore the trolls and just keep posting ideas at this point. Never argue with a fool - they will drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience. |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
1359
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 17:22:00 -
[298] - Quote
I guess the question is "What ideas?" CCP has a good list to work with already. |

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
928
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 17:30:00 -
[299] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:I guess the question is "What ideas?" CCP has a good list to work with already.
"the dev says they had a notification system ready but yanked it cos its not in the essence of the sandbox.."
Did you look at the link Alucard provided? Did the dev say this? If so where? Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
1359
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 18:22:00 -
[300] - Quote
Cearain wrote:X Gallentius wrote:I guess the question is "What ideas?" CCP has a good list to work with already. "the dev says they had a notification system ready but yanked it cos its not in the essence of the sandbox.." Did you look at the link Alucard provided? Did the dev say this? If so where? Gonna assume this post was a repeat. |

Cosmo Raata
No Moar Tears I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
60
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 21:54:00 -
[301] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:I guess the question is "What ideas?" CCP has a good list to work with already.
So first I say "Choose an idea already CCP, there are tons of ideas to choose from" and the critics response is "what ideas, don't come in here and provide no details for your plan"
Then I suggest we start writing all ideas in here and its now, "Don't we already have enough ideas to go on?"
FFS, Is there any intelligence left playing EVE or at least posting on our forums? |

X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
1360
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 23:57:00 -
[302] - Quote
Yeah fine, point taken. List is here. CCP needs to implement it. Here's what they said at fanfest (according to one blogger): CCP FW Summary
I left that to attend the Faction War round table. The bloody farmers were out in force and they were a big topic. Warp core stabs and cloaking Daredevils were talked about extensively. CCP may change the rats to make warp core stabs a poor choice!
Another good thing was button counters slowly resetting so those bouncing from plex to plex whilst being chased would lose their "hard earnt" work to that point.
Large plex spawning is not working as intended. There is a bug that needs to be squashed, but first needs to be found.
CCP want to split militia and allied militia in the overview so you can shoot your allied militia if you want.
The bug where friendly rats shoot you is a bug! Needs fixing.
Talked about giving neuts a suspect flag if they enter a plex. Good idea!
CCP want to iterate further on system control and benefits for having high upgrade levels.
All good stuff but as expected FW is not going to get any significant developer resources for the foreseeable future.
Next up was live events |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
579
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 00:21:00 -
[303] - Quote
Timers in empty plexes count back to zero. If a friendly pilot is in plex it counts back to zero at x2 speed. No stabs inside a FW plex. Cannot activate a gate. Or cannot run timer. Ships with cloaks fitted cannot run timers, regardless if the cloak is active, inactive, online or offline. Possibly tone down the tier system. Or tone down the base level of LP for plexing.
These are the baseline ideas. There are some other ideas like restricting ship class for counting the timer, which i really dont like. It will just encourage far more camps. |

Lin Suizei
141
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 00:47:00 -
[304] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:Timers in empty plexes count back to zero. If a friendly or neutral pilot is in plex it counts back to zero at x20 speed. Alternatively, if no plex contestants are in the plex at any time, the plex instantly resets to zero.
Reason: A slow timer rollback forces a PvPer to stay on grid/at the gate and "out-wait" a farmer. This is a win for the farmer, because it's boring (and more importantly, not rewarding) for the PvPer and he won't come back next time. Neutrals must be included because most farming happens outside of faction war "home" areas, where faction warriors typically do not go that often, because they know they aren't getting a fight from farmers.
But most importantly, shutting down farming must not be a contest of patience between the farmer and a PvPer, or farming will be as rampant as ever.
Crosi Wesdo wrote:No ships with a warp stab strength above zero inside a FW plex. Cannot activate a gate. Or cannot run timer.
Reason: Plex farming ventures. Xeros S*** > are you really suprised? im not here to pvp so why the fuc not Xeros S**** > oh go cry somewhere else, im not in fw for the ****** pvp
Welcome to faction war. |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
579
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 00:55:00 -
[305] - Quote
Lin Suizei wrote:Crosi Wesdo wrote:Timers in empty plexes count back to zero. If a friendly or neutral pilot is in plex it counts back to zero at x20 speed. Alternatively, if no plex contestants are in the plex at any time, the plex instantly resets to zero. Reason: A slow timer rollback forces a PvPer to stay on grid/at the gate and "out-wait" a farmer. This is a win for the farmer, because it's boring (and more importantly, not rewarding) for the PvPer and he won't come back next time. Neutrals must be included because most farming happens outside of faction war "home" areas, where faction warriors typically do not go that often, because they know they aren't getting a fight from farmers. But most importantly, shutting down farming must not be a contest of patience between the farmer and a PvPer, or farming will be as rampant as ever. Crosi Wesdo wrote:No ships with a warp stab strength above zero inside a FW plex. Cannot activate a gate. Or cannot run timer. Reason: Plex farming ventures.
No Reason. PvP'ers also fight in and for plexes. No need for knee jerks. If i get kicked out of a plex with 1m left because the wt is in a ship i dont want to fight with my current ship/fit. I would like time to go and refit / reship without the entire timer resetting. Your method could simply lead to a small group of guys kicking every solo plexer (farmer or not) out of every plex they can warp to. Instantly resetting the timers in all of them. Its just a terribad idea.
Good point on the venture though. |

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
928
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 02:15:00 -
[306] - Quote
The only change described in that roundtable which will even effect the amount of pvp in plexes is the rollbacks. The rollbacks can be fine tuned over time.
You don't need stabs at all as you can move about 40 k away from the warp in and start aligning when you see someone on short dscan. Most rabbits do not even use stabs afaik. They just warp away when I enter or even before I enter. Its extremely rare that I actually get a point on a rabbit and then see them warp.
Screwing around with npcs is obviously a pve solution. We had really hard npcs and spawns of them in the past. It just made it so people couldnt' pvp in plexes. Now that the npcs have been toned down to the extreme, at least we get pvp in plexes. Many of the rabbits are defensive plexing anyway.
lp payouts will effect lp and have little effect on pvp. Even when plexes paid no lp, we still had rabbits. Many if not most of the rabbits are defensive plexing anyway and they already get very little lp.
Cloaks are pretty much necessary if you want to fly anything larger than a cruiser in low sec due to the mwd cloak trick. Plus since you can't dock in enemy space a cloak allows you to sort of dock in a safe spot. Rather than saying no cloaks in the plex I would say if you activate a cloak the timer resets to 0 instantly. But again that will have little effect because cloaking isn't essential to rabbit plexing. Being able to run and hide is the big advantage.
Rollbacks and better intel tools so the pvpers can better defend their space, are the only things that will make this a pvp game. They were already slotted to be in retribution. If people care about fw they should push ccp to get them released soon. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Taoist Dragon
Bastion of Mad Behaviour Caldari State Capturing
427
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 03:22:00 -
[307] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Yeah fine, point taken. List is here. CCP needs to implement it. Here's what they said at fanfest (according to one blogger): CCP FW SummaryI left that to attend the Faction War round table. The bloody farmers were out in force and they were a big topic. Warp core stabs and cloaking Daredevils were talked about extensively. CCP may change the rats to make warp core stabs a poor choice!
Another good thing was button counters slowly resetting so those bouncing from plex to plex whilst being chased would lose their "hard earnt" work to that point.
Large plex spawning is not working as intended. There is a bug that needs to be squashed, but first needs to be found.
CCP want to split militia and allied militia in the overview so you can shoot your allied militia if you want.
The bug where friendly rats shoot you is a bug! Needs fixing.
Talked about giving neuts a suspect flag if they enter a plex. Good idea!
CCP want to iterate further on system control and benefits for having high upgrade levels.
All good stuff but as expected FW is not going to get any significant developer resources for the foreseeable future.
Next up was live events
All of this is pretty much the general consensus on these forums and with most players I know.
The only one I think is crap is this suspect flag for entering a plex if you are neutral. Seriously you are in low sec. If a neut enters then you make the choice attack and take the sec hit (if he's above -5 sec) or let him engage first so you don't take a sec hit. Just like everyone else in eve.
But pretty much FW has had it's big makeover for now so like it or lump it as other areas of eve are in more dire need of attention. That is the Way, the Tao.
Balance is everything. |

Lin Suizei
141
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 06:53:00 -
[308] - Quote
Quote: No Reason. PvP'ers also fight in and for plexes. No need for knee jerks. If i get kicked out of a plex with 1m left because the wt is in a ship i dont want to fight with my current ship/fit. I would like time to go and refit / reship without the entire timer resetting. Your method could simply lead to a small group of guys kicking every solo plexer (farmer or not) out of every plex they can warp to. Instantly resetting the timers in all of them. Its just a terribad idea.
Why is this a bad thing? A blob *should* be able to kick solo plexers out as much as they like. If the blob is willing to spend a night running around a constellation and chasing out anyone solo plexing, why shouldn't they be permitted to do that? If the solo plexer wants to keep a plex, shouldn't he come in a ship that's able to hold onto the plex against all opposition, or at least stay alive until backup can be called?
If such a blob is being disruptive, shouldn't the defending militia form up and fight?
Besides, consider this - right now, FW plex farming is, ironically, like a safe version of highsec ice mining. Should ice miners also be permitted to continue their ice cycle from where they left off, if they are bumped out of range halfway through? Xeros S*** > are you really suprised? im not here to pvp so why the fuc not Xeros S**** > oh go cry somewhere else, im not in fw for the ****** pvp
Welcome to faction war. |

Veshta Yoshida
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
651
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 08:06:00 -
[309] - Quote
Taoist Dragon wrote:...The only one I think is crap is this suspect flag for entering a plex if you are neutral. Seriously you are in low sec.... Well, the person is willingly moving into a conflict zone with an ongoing war .. doubt troops in Baghdad simply ignored everyone not in uniform .. actually, since plexes are military installations the comparison would probably be better if instead of Baghdad one used <-insert FOB name-> and had a random civilian wander through the gate.
At any rate, they are making security status laughably insignificant so does it really matter whether or not a militia member takes a ~0.5% hit or however small it is?
Have to agree, the complaint is that the farmers time under the current system is worth a lot more than those who would do him harm .. steady roll-back pace 1:1 is the only way it would have any meaning .. otherwise defensive work becomes a matter of running hit squads (read: blobs) against o-plexers with zones becoming static. One might argue that if the defender stays on beacon after chasing off an attacker he get a 1.5-2x modifier until damage from o-plexer is undone but not sure it is needed .. LP/hr will go down like a 5$ prostitute which in itself will discourage a lot of the alt-farming (many are paying the extra accounts with plex through plexing).
Stabs: Why arbitrarily deny access based on fit? Just have the DED spaces nullify the beneficial effects (WC strength) of the stabs without affecting the detrimental effects (sensor hit) and Bob's your cross-dressing uncle. Make it all DED spaces, Eve wide, applicable in high-sec missions, incursions, null spawned instances the works and everyone gets to have funny pictures of Bob! Cloaks: Actually a decent idea to make cloak use an exercise in futility without denying the use of it .. might even be better than my slot machine decloak field, but cannot in good conscience officially say that someone had a better solution than I so will leave it at that  |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
580
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 08:52:00 -
[310] - Quote
Lin Suizei wrote:Quote: No Reason. PvP'ers also fight in and for plexes. No need for knee jerks. If i get kicked out of a plex with 1m left because the wt is in a ship i dont want to fight with my current ship/fit. I would like time to go and refit / reship without the entire timer resetting. Your method could simply lead to a small group of guys kicking every solo plexer (farmer or not) out of every plex they can warp to. Instantly resetting the timers in all of them. Its just a terribad idea.
Why is this a bad thing? A blob *should* be able to kick solo plexers out as much as they like. If the blob is willing to spend a night running around a constellation and chasing out anyone solo plexing, why shouldn't they be permitted to do that? If the solo plexer wants to keep a plex, shouldn't he come in a ship that's able to hold onto the plex against all opposition, or at least stay alive until backup can be called? If such a blob is being disruptive, shouldn't the defending militia form up and fight? Besides, consider this - right now, FW plex farming is, ironically, like a safe version of highsec ice mining. Should ice miners also be permitted to continue their ice cycle from where they left off, if they are bumped out of range halfway through?
They can kick solo plexers out of plexes. However plexing is a catalyst for pvp. Removing an incentive to reship/formup, as in to fight for a partially completed plex, is not really a good idea.
People fixate on isk and farmers too much imo, forming ideas that go too far. |

Hemmo Paskiainen
Aliastra Gallente Federation
409
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 10:09:00 -
[311] - Quote
WTF... This is what happends when you have carebears having pvp as a methode to make isk. A ******* clusterfuck... Want to pvp but it must be free and profitable and with as less risk as possible. ******* pafhetic carebears, discusting... In null-Sec it is a isk sing were some ppl lose billions a week without gaining isk out of it.
Lowsec should allow only hic bubbles to be active and ditch the sec hits and all problems are solved.
To cosmo: Welcome to the endgame of EVE, where all your friends left due ccp failure and you soon only log in to skill up, make some epic isk with patch speculation and cant even be botherd to undock anymore. CCP FIX BLACK OPS FFS
[url]http://img232.imageshack.us/img232/9679/whatihavedoneineve.jpg[/url] |

Lin Suizei
141
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 12:17:00 -
[312] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:They can kick solo plexers out of plexes. However plexing is a catalyst for pvp. Removing an incentive to reship/formup, as in to fight for a partially completed plex, is not really a good idea.
With regards to a fast rollback or timer reset hurting PvPers, I somewhat disagree - I think people who want a fight will generally reship and have a go anyway for the opportunity of PvP, regardless of timer reset. The motivation shouldn't be "oh, one medium plex'es worth of LP that we can all farm on our alts, by ourselves, in complete safety", but "hey, let's compete with (militia) to see who can form the biggest blob and make the other guy dock".
Xeros S*** > are you really suprised? im not here to pvp so why the fuc not Xeros S**** > oh go cry somewhere else, im not in fw for the ****** pvp
Welcome to faction war. |

Veshta Yoshida
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
653
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 12:54:00 -
[313] - Quote
Lin Suizei wrote:...I think people who want a fight will generally reship and have a go anyway for the opportunity of PvP, regardless of timer reset... And you are right, problem is that those people are about as common honest marketing, you know it exists but it disappears in the flood of crap. Auto-run timers might not be able to stop the flood, which it shouldn't in any case (free to do whatever), but it should be able to give the honest folk a chance to influence their own environment .. at present that just can't happen. Alternative is to reduce possible LP from plexing to a level so low that it is not possible to do them exclusively, pay for an account and still get a profit .. but at this point that option is no longer on the table, CCP has to ride the ****-storm whenever they meddle with peoples wallets and they have been doing their damnedest to placate the masses since the last storm raged. Could be of course that they are recharging batteries to be able to ride that baby, but then it will probably be associated with (what will hopefully be) sweeping null changes thus postponing any FW storms indefinitely.
The reship for partially completed plexes died with docking denial. One side will always have in-system options while the other can have quite a long trip .. far longer than allowed by the timers in a majority of cases, which leads to one fight per plex if defender wins. Result is that attacks on a system is either done by the skittish alt horde or an over-kill crew with X links and whatnot, the rolling plex fight is simply not possible to the same extent as before.
Back in the day when plexes were finite, we often kept off timers to give enemy time in order to prolong fights but that is no longer viable as they spawn continuously, capture area overlaps with warp-in, they give LP and are just as boring so people naturally opt for closing them down post haste.
PS: Props for the Plexing = Ice-mining comparison, very acute. Has boredom, income, ship restrictions and fit preferences .. ticks all boxes  |

Taoist Dragon
Bastion of Mad Behaviour Caldari State Capturing
428
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 13:12:00 -
[314] - Quote
Veshta Yoshida wrote:Taoist Dragon wrote:...The only one I think is crap is this suspect flag for entering a plex if you are neutral. Seriously you are in low sec.... Well, the person is willingly moving into a conflict zone with an ongoing war .. doubt troops in Baghdad simply ignored everyone not in uniform .. actually, since plexes are military installations the comparison would probably be better if instead of Baghdad one used <-insert FOB name-> and had a random civilian wander through the gate.
Well having spent a fair bit of time in various FOB's around the world I can tell you for fact it is exactly like that. Unless you are getting shot at you are not 'allowed' to open fire first.
Imagine all the press having a field day with the Diggers in the middle east if they just gunned down some random people who wandered into there check point.
This 'suspect marking' of neuts as they enter is basically the same as giving the open fire command to every civilian coming up to the front gate.
Sorry. On this you are completely wrong and still don't have a valid argument for suspect flagging neuts who enter. That is the Way, the Tao.
Balance is everything. |

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
930
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 13:45:00 -
[315] - Quote
Taoist Dragon wrote:Veshta Yoshida wrote:Taoist Dragon wrote:...The only one I think is crap is this suspect flag for entering a plex if you are neutral. Seriously you are in low sec.... Well, the person is willingly moving into a conflict zone with an ongoing war .. doubt troops in Baghdad simply ignored everyone not in uniform .. actually, since plexes are military installations the comparison would probably be better if instead of Baghdad one used <-insert FOB name-> and had a random civilian wander through the gate. Well having spent a fair bit of time in various FOB's around the world I can tell you for fact it is exactly like that. Unless you are getting shot at you are not 'allowed' to open fire first. Imagine all the press having a field day with the Diggers in the middle east if they just gunned down some random people who wandered into there check point. This 'suspect marking' of neuts as they enter is basically the same as giving the open fire command to every civilian coming up to the front gate. Sorry. On this you are completely wrong and still don't have a valid argument for suspect flagging neuts who enter.
I think its great to have suspect flag in the plexes. Some people are concerned about their sec status and that is one reason why they join fw. Neutrals who go in are going in for pvp. I see no reason why the sec status should continue to act as a deterent to pvp.
As far as real life comparisons keep in mind that we are flying combat vessels. So its more like random people coming into the check point in tanks.
But whatever I think that will be a good change but not a huge game changer.
IMO Lin and Crosi are both making good points about rollbacks. Although I tend to like the more draconian countbacks, imagine you are in a system running a small plex in a navy frigate. And then you see a wt enter and open a novice in the same system and start running it. Ideally I would be able to warp over and fight him without losing all my time. In the same token I have chased farmers back and forth from plex to plex in benny hill fashion. So I am not sure the pvper is really winning in that case if the timers rollback is slow.
This is why I think ccp might consider an added 2 minute penalty immediate reduction (capped a neutral) if you warp out when an enemy or neutal is either on grid or on grid with your accel gate. And perhaps not even have the count back if you leave the plex when no one is at your plex. In other words try to make some rough estimate on whether you are warping out in order to avoid pvp or not. If your not warping out to avoid pvp then I don't think you need to be penalized. Especially if you are warping out to get pvp.
But really I think like the op says. CCP needs to get this mechanic out there and then tweak it as necessary. There are allot of options of how to implement it. Its time to get it out and then it can be tweaked as necessary.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Cosmo Raata
No Moar Tears I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
61
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 13:52:00 -
[316] - Quote
Hemmo Paskiainen wrote:WTF... This is what happends when you have carebears having pvp as a methode to make isk. A ******* clusterfuck... Want to pvp but it must be free and profitable and with as less risk as possible. ******* pafhetic carebears, discusting... In null-Sec it is a isk sing were some ppl lose billions a week without gaining isk out of it.
Lowsec should allow only hic bubbles to be active and ditch the sec hits and all problems are solved.
To cosmo: Welcome to the endgame of EVE, where all your friends left due ccp failure and you soon only log in to skill up, make some epic isk with patch speculation and cant even be botherd to undock anymore.
Now this man feels my pain. If you understand this, you understand why I keep posting here hoping CCP wakes the f*ck up. Game used to be great with many programming flaws, now its got very few programming flaws but is too soft. |

Taoist Dragon
Bastion of Mad Behaviour
428
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 14:40:00 -
[317] - Quote
Cearain wrote: I think its great to have suspect flag in the plexes. Some people are concerned about their sec status and that is one reason why they join fw. Neutrals who go in are going in for pvp. I see no reason why the sec status should continue to act as a deterent to pvp.
I don't have any issues around sec status hits or anything else in eve. The issue I have is that FW'ers feel they have the right to be able to shoot neuts without consequence 'cos they are in FW'. This I think is wrong as it goes against the whole sandbox idea and that your actions have consequence. If you shoot a neut in lowsec that isn't flashy you get a sec hit. simple as that. It won't change the neuts coming into plex for fights as that is what they are there for it is the idea that is has consequence for one player but not the other.
Man up FW'ers! That is the Way, the Tao.
Balance is everything. |

ALUCARD 1208
Spiritus Draconis Sicarius Draconis
180
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 14:42:00 -
[318] - Quote
Cosmo Raata wrote:you understand why I keep posting here hoping CCP wakes the f*ck up. Game used to be great with many programming flaws, now its got very few programming flaws but is too soft.
Then this really is the wrong place to be posting try the features section or something else these get the most devs feedback posts only time they come here is to lock posts or ban ppl *COUGH DAMARR COUGH* GÖÑ HIGH FIVES GÖÑ-á |

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
930
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 14:55:00 -
[319] - Quote
ALUCARD 1208 wrote:Cosmo Raata wrote:you understand why I keep posting here hoping CCP wakes the f*ck up. Game used to be great with many programming flaws, now its got very few programming flaws but is too soft. Then this really is the wrong place to be posting try the features section or something else these get the most devs feedback posts only time they come here is to lock posts or ban ppl  *COUGH DAMARR COUGH*
Alucard, you again.
Aren't you the guy who lied about what the devs said regarding faction war to pathetically try to support your view? I see you keep dodging that point. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

ALUCARD 1208
Spiritus Draconis Sicarius Draconis
181
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 15:40:00 -
[320] - Quote
Cearain wrote:
Aren't you the guy who lied about what the devs said regarding faction war to pathetically try to support your view? I see you keep dodging that point.
Dodged the point? i was writing on a post that was actually relevant with cosmo id not even read above yet iv just sat down at my pc.. To which that point still stand you will have more joy @ ccp reading features section than W&T
So for the fanfest thing i linked when i watched fanfest last weekend i was a little wasted and did watch a few of them and the interviews with gaurd after. after re watching you are correct it didnt say that i must have had 2 seminars mixed up or it was in one of gaurds interviews afterwoods which i can not watch to find out so for that i do apologise. But they did not put in notifications that they had ready i knew that for sure
I wouldnt have linked the round up if i didnt genually belive thats what id seen but as i say i was wasted it was the weekend  GÖÑ HIGH FIVES GÖÑ-á |

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
930
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 16:43:00 -
[321] - Quote
deleted pending Alu's posting of this interview with ccp guard. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

ALUCARD 1208
Spiritus Draconis Sicarius Draconis
181
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 19:51:00 -
[322] - Quote
Cearain wrote:deleted pending Alu's posting of this interview with ccp guard.
No need to delete stuff i never said i was linking more
No cearain the interviews and stuff were done by gaurd inbetween seminars, and as i said i cant watch them to find out there not on the twitch channel maybe someone has them on youtube but im not activly seeking them just as proof to you, i thought **** was on that vid it wasnt. As i said id heard notifications were taken out and something was not in the esence of sandbox somewere maybe i did get 2 seminars mashed up in my head when id had a drink idk now its even confused me.
It really doesnt matter now neway as [left][/left
]
GÖÑ HIGH FIVES GÖÑ-á |

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
580
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 22:37:00 -
[323] - Quote
Cearain wrote: Tedious words.
Like, really. |

Cosmo Raata
No Moar Tears I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
61
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 23:07:00 -
[324] - Quote
ALUCARD 1208 wrote:Cosmo Raata wrote:you understand why I keep posting here hoping CCP wakes the f*ck up. Game used to be great with many programming flaws, now its got very few programming flaws but is too soft. Then this really is the wrong place to be posting try the features section or something else these get the most devs feedback posts only time they come here is to lock posts or ban ppl  *COUGH DAMARR COUGH*
Thread not moving. End of story. |

ALUCARD 1208
Spiritus Draconis Sicarius Draconis
181
|
Posted - 2013.05.04 13:53:00 -
[325] - Quote
cearain wrote:2)Calling me a liar for saying I get 100-150 solo kills. I link the killboard showing that I indeed got that many the last 2 months and you still call me a liar.
This is still correct u made it out as tho u got that every month and ur not terribad at finding pvp and linked your board yes youve had a good 2 months but when youve only managed it what 3 times in 4 years it really isnt something to boast about.....
cearain wrote:3)Also I give link and a quote from a dev talking about faction war notifications positively and you claim "he doesnt speak specifically on fw notifications..." even though the thread title was "Sticky:FW: I-hub and system upgrades" And yes he was specifically refering to faction war notifications as part of upgrading a system.
errrrrrrrr ok ill link what the dev says and undferline the important bit for you
CCP dev wrote:
but it should maybe be independent of Factional Warfare and something you need in all cases.
That doesnt look like they wanted it to be FW specific to me mate
And like i said id watched alot of fanfest in a drunken stupor and maybe mixed **** up iv already said im now not clear. And as i said before i wouldnt have linked it if i had not had it in my head it was all together. GÖÑ HIGH FIVES GÖÑ-á |
|

ISD Dorrim Barstorlode
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
2187

|
Posted - 2013.05.04 15:01:00 -
[326] - Quote
As the thread has run its course, I will be closing it now. ISD Dorrim Barstorlode Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 .. 11 :: [one page] |