| Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Poetic Stanziel
Fweddit I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
1869
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 23:13:00 -
[1] - Quote
Told they would be released Monday. It is now very late Tuesday. Will we see them Wednesday? Amarr Militia - Fweddit - http://fweddit.com Poetic Discourse - http://poeticstanziel.blogspot.com |

Frying Doom
2443
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 23:18:00 -
[2] - Quote
Poetic Stanziel wrote:Told they would be released Monday. It is now very late Tuesday. Will we see them Wednesday? I wouldn't hold my breath
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2956184#post2956184
They seem to be waiting till they can put there own spin on it first. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

GallowsCalibrator
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
276
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 09:40:00 -
[3] - Quote
Tinfoil thread of the week. |

Frying Doom
2447
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 09:53:00 -
[4] - Quote
GallowsCalibrator wrote:Tinfoil thread of the week. If you don't think they are going to try to spin the 12.12% turn out, you are a fool. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Snow Axe
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1276
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 09:58:00 -
[5] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:If you don't think they are going to try to spin the 12.12% turn out, you are a fool.
Yeah, the company that had no problems at all picking the council themselves for Dust is going to forge votes to "spin" a lower-than-last-year vote turnout because you know what **** it I can't even finish that sentence you're literally ********. "Look any reason why you need to talk like that? I have now reported you. I dont need to listen to your bad tone. If you cant have a grown up conversation then leave the thread[" |

GallowsCalibrator
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
281
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 10:10:00 -
[6] - Quote
Snow Axe wrote:Frying Doom wrote:If you don't think they are going to try to spin the 12.12% turn out, you are a fool. Yeah, the company that had no problems at all picking the council themselves for Dust is going to forge votes to "spin" a lower-than-last-year vote turnout because you know what **** it I can't even finish that sentence you're literally ********.
It's like watching baby's first badpost.
Only they're all bad posts. Forever. |

Frying Doom
2447
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 10:13:00 -
[7] - Quote
GallowsCalibrator wrote:Snow Axe wrote:Frying Doom wrote:If you don't think they are going to try to spin the 12.12% turn out, you are a fool. Yeah, the company that had no problems at all picking the council themselves for Dust is going to forge votes to "spin" a lower-than-last-year vote turnout because you know what **** it I can't even finish that sentence you're literally ********. It's like watching baby's first badpost. Only they're all bad posts. Forever. Oh the horror, I am being taunted by a Goon bad poster. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

GallowsCalibrator
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
281
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 10:38:00 -
[8] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:GallowsCalibrator wrote:Snow Axe wrote:Frying Doom wrote:If you don't think they are going to try to spin the 12.12% turn out, you are a fool. Yeah, the company that had no problems at all picking the council themselves for Dust is going to forge votes to "spin" a lower-than-last-year vote turnout because you know what **** it I can't even finish that sentence you're literally ********. It's like watching baby's first badpost. Only they're all bad posts. Forever. Oh the horror, I am being taunted by a Goon bad poster. 
I'm not the one that thinks there's some kind of CCP :tinfoil: conspiracy about the CSM vote turnout. |

Frying Doom
2447
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 10:50:00 -
[9] - Quote
GallowsCalibrator wrote:Frying Doom wrote:GallowsCalibrator wrote:Snow Axe wrote:Frying Doom wrote:If you don't think they are going to try to spin the 12.12% turn out, you are a fool. Yeah, the company that had no problems at all picking the council themselves for Dust is going to forge votes to "spin" a lower-than-last-year vote turnout because you know what **** it I can't even finish that sentence you're literally ********. It's like watching baby's first badpost. Only they're all bad posts. Forever. Oh the horror, I am being taunted by a Goon bad poster.  I'm not the one that thinks there's some kind of CCP :tinfoil: conspiracy about the CSM vote turnout. Another crack head. You guys are coming out of the wood work.
So you think spin is a conspiracy theory.
Must suck to be you, thinking your government is coming to get you all the time. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

GallowsCalibrator
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
283
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 10:59:00 -
[10] - Quote
The fact you think that the delay is due to some mysterious 'spin' is the tinfoil, but hey.
Turnout is still pretty close to usual afaik. |

Frying Doom
2447
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 11:02:00 -
[11] - Quote
GallowsCalibrator wrote:The fact you think that the delay is due to some mysterious 'spin' is the tinfoil, but hey. Turnout is still pretty close to usual afaik. We dropped down to 12.12%, the percentage of people who voted dropped 4 and a half percent, the first time it has dropped since the CSM became year long terms.
Why did they only mention the number of votes cast and not the percentage of eligible voters, like they have every other year in their dev blog.
The answer is spin control. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

GallowsCalibrator
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
283
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 11:10:00 -
[12] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:GallowsCalibrator wrote:The fact you think that the delay is due to some mysterious 'spin' is the tinfoil, but hey. Turnout is still pretty close to usual afaik. We dropped down to 12.12%, the percentage of people who voted dropped 4 and a half percent, the first time it has dropped since the CSM became year long terms. Why did they only mention the number of votes cast and not the percentage of eligible voters, like they have every other year in their dev blog. The answer is spin control.
Ahahahaha you're so precious. |

Frying Doom
2447
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 11:29:00 -
[13] - Quote
GallowsCalibrator wrote:Ahahahaha you're so precious. Well at least now I can say I have conversed with someone who would actually believe politicians who say, they will lower taxes, while increasing spending while not incurring a deficit.
People told me your kind exist, but I never believed them until now. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Snow Axe
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1277
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 11:32:00 -
[14] - Quote
CCP aren't politicians, not in any sense of the word. They're completely above and beyond the political process, namely because they could abolish it tomorrow if they so desired. "Look any reason why you need to talk like that? I have now reported you. I dont need to listen to your bad tone. If you cant have a grown up conversation then leave the thread[" |

GallowsCalibrator
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
283
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 11:37:00 -
[15] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:GallowsCalibrator wrote:Ahahahaha you're so precious. Well at least now I can say I have conversed with someone who would actually believe politicians who say, they will lower taxes, while increasing spending while not incurring a deficit. People told me your kind exist, but I never believed them until now. 
That is the greatest strawman I have ever seen. |

Frying Doom
2447
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 11:38:00 -
[16] - Quote
Snow Axe wrote:CCP aren't politicians, not in any sense of the word. They're completely above and beyond the political process, namely because they could abolish it tomorrow if they so desired. Were did that comment even come from?
No CCP are not politicians, they are a business, they are there to make money. Yes the CSM is a PR exercise both for the players benefit and externally. The PR value would be increase the more people that are involved in the process.
Subsequently why I would like the chairman chosen for the PR value for the CSM, rather than just someones ego. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Frying Doom
2447
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 11:39:00 -
[17] - Quote
GallowsCalibrator wrote:Frying Doom wrote:GallowsCalibrator wrote:Ahahahaha you're so precious. Well at least now I can say I have conversed with someone who would actually believe politicians who say, they will lower taxes, while increasing spending while not incurring a deficit. People told me your kind exist, but I never believed them until now.  That is the greatest strawman I have ever seen. No I was insulting your intelligence, but apparently you were not smart enough to notice. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
1258
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 13:00:00 -
[18] - Quote
The low turn out is thanks to a more complicated voting system that doesn't even accomplish anything they claim it does anyway.
hope this helps |

Frying Doom
2448
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 13:09:00 -
[19] - Quote
TheGunslinger42 wrote:The low turn out is thanks to a more complicated voting system that doesn't even accomplish anything they claim it does anyway.
hope this helps Always nice to hear from people.
More people need to comment about why they did not vote, or what they did not like about the elections or the previous CSM.
Only through comments can problems be fixed. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
1353
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 13:56:00 -
[20] - Quote
I'd heard it was related to Veritas being out of the country. (Can't remember who I heard that from though) Steve Ronuken for CSM 9!-á I'm starting early :) Handy tools and an SDE conversion Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |

Temba Ronin
216
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 14:06:00 -
[21] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:TheGunslinger42 wrote:The low turn out is thanks to a more complicated voting system that doesn't even accomplish anything they claim it does anyway.
hope this helps Always nice to hear from people. More people need to comment about why they did not vote, or what they did not like about the elections or the previous CSM. Only through comments can problems be fixed. It is a game dude! Why do you think it is a problem if players choose to not vote? I know you are fond of dropping the numbers that do not support your position, suppose none of your straw man questions about why people did not vote are valid?
Do you think it possible that with a number of non-english speaking players from around the world, a number of players who don't give a rats behind about any political anything, and a number of players who just want to play EVE that expecting voter participation to climb year after year might have been unrealistic?
If it's not broke don't fix it, and just because it didn't come out the way you wanted don't try to fix it. The problem seems to be your lack of acceptance of the fact that the majority of the players who made the choice to vote did not vote in the manner you wanted them to. That's not CSM7's problem, perhaps not so much CCP's problem, that's your problem .... deal with it.
Power To The Players! |

Frying Doom
2449
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 14:17:00 -
[22] - Quote
Temba Ronin wrote:Frying Doom wrote:TheGunslinger42 wrote:The low turn out is thanks to a more complicated voting system that doesn't even accomplish anything they claim it does anyway.
hope this helps Always nice to hear from people. More people need to comment about why they did not vote, or what they did not like about the elections or the previous CSM. Only through comments can problems be fixed. It is a game dude! Why do you think it is a problem if players choose to not vote? I know you are fond of dropping the numbers that do not support your position, suppose none of your straw man questions about why people did not vote are valid? Do you think it possible that with a number of non-english speaking players from around the world, a number of players who don't give a rats behind about any political anything, and a number of players who just want to play EVE that expecting voter participation to climb year after year might have been unrealistic? If it's not broke don't fix it, and just because it didn't come out the way you wanted don't try to fix it. The problem seems to be your lack of acceptance of the fact that the majority of the players who made the choice to vote did not vote in the manner you wanted them to. That's not CSM7's problem, perhaps not so much CCP's problem, that's your problem .... deal with it. Power To The Players! That is a lot of words, to say you don't want to hear peoples opinions. I have never really cared how players vote, as long as they vote. If you read the voting forums you could see that. So please don't project your own inadequacies onto me.
Yes some people just plain don't vote. Yes there are non-english speaking players and more needs to be done to reach them.
The CSM is the voice of the players and I personally would like to see as many of those voices heard as possible. The more people that vote the more representative the council is of EvE, the more weight that voice has and on top of all that the better a PR tool it is for CCP.
As to it not being broken, now you are just dribbling, the voting takes a major down turn after years of steady growth, but you just say "If it's not broke don't fix it" Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Temba Ronin
216
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 14:35:00 -
[23] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Temba Ronin wrote:Frying Doom wrote:TheGunslinger42 wrote:The low turn out is thanks to a more complicated voting system that doesn't even accomplish anything they claim it does anyway.
hope this helps Always nice to hear from people. More people need to comment about why they did not vote, or what they did not like about the elections or the previous CSM. Only through comments can problems be fixed. It is a game dude! Why do you think it is a problem if players choose to not vote? I know you are fond of dropping the numbers that do not support your position, suppose none of your straw man questions about why people did not vote are valid? Do you think it possible that with a number of non-english speaking players from around the world, a number of players who don't give a rats behind about any political anything, and a number of players who just want to play EVE that expecting voter participation to climb year after year might have been unrealistic? If it's not broke don't fix it, and just because it didn't come out the way you wanted don't try to fix it. The problem seems to be your lack of acceptance of the fact that the majority of the players who made the choice to vote did not vote in the manner you wanted them to. That's not CSM7's problem, perhaps not so much CCP's problem, that's your problem .... deal with it. Power To The Players! That is a lot of words, to say you don't want to hear peoples opinions. I have never really cared how players vote, as long as they vote. If you read the voting forums you could see that. So please don't project your own inadequacies onto me. Yes some people just plain don't vote. Yes there are non-english speaking players and more needs to be done to reach them. The CSM is the voice of the players and I personally would like to see as many of those voices heard as possible. The more people that vote the more representative the council is of EvE, the more weight that voice has and on top of all that the better a PR tool it is for CCP. As to it not being broken, now you are just dribbling, the voting takes a major down turn after years of steady growth, but you just say "If it's not broke don't fix it" Are you incapable of grasping a new concept? You don't care who they vote for as long as they vote? Who made you king? Get over yourself, nothing ever goes up without coming down except self righteous windbags who need to "fix" other players so they vote.
Power To The Players! |

GallowsCalibrator
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
285
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 14:39:00 -
[24] - Quote
Temba Ronin wrote: -- snip -- self righteous windbags
/thread |

June Ting
Valkyries of Night Of Sound Mind
33
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 15:34:00 -
[25] - Quote
It'll be interesting to see how many partial ballots and how many donkey vote/kitchen sink votes there are vs. organized slate votes. Proud independent player and member of Provibloc. |

Alekseyev Karrde
Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group
1187
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 17:28:00 -
[26] - Quote
According to Poetic Stanziel (the Glen Beck to your Orly Taitz) math the % is down because there's over 50k new accounts on TQ. Yes, I'm sure CCP is absolutely scrambling to find a way to spin that positively...
I don't know why the dev blog is delayed but I doubt the reason is remotely sinister, mostly because there's no reason to be and it would take considerable work to do for no imaginable gain. "Alekseyev Karrde: mercenary of my heart."-á -Arydanika, Voices from the Void
Hero of the CSM Noir./Noir. Academy Recruiting: www.noirmercs.com |

Varius Xeral
Galactic Trade Syndicate
773
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 17:36:00 -
[27] - Quote
The only thing lower than the voter turnout is the percentage of players who care about voter turnout.
BADOOMCHISH |

GetSirrus
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
30
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 22:33:00 -
[28] - Quote
well, the OP could stage a protest over this. park your pod next to the jita monument then hold your breath or cease posting - either will work for the rest of us. |

GallowsCalibrator
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
298
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 22:56:00 -
[29] - Quote
Him ceasing posting would be pretty nice |

Frying Doom
2456
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 00:05:00 -
[30] - Quote
Temba Ronin wrote:Are you incapable of grasping a new concept? You don't care who they vote for as long as they vote? Who made you king? Get over yourself, nothing ever goes up without coming down except self righteous windbags who need to "fix" other players so they vote.
Power To The Players! No one made me king, but unlike you I would like to see the CSM, the voice of the players, actually be representative of the Majority of players and how do we know what they want? We get them involved in the voting process and in the forums. How? By making the CSM more appealing to them and educating them as to why they should vote.
Yes the current situation does better for the organised blocs, so they have a vested interest in keeping it that way but even they did not want the STV system originally, now that Null has 10 members on the CSM via it, they seem ok with it.
So you seem more like the self righteous windbag, happy keeping things as they are now. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Frying Doom
2456
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 00:06:00 -
[31] - Quote
Alekseyev Karrde wrote:According to Poetic Stanziel (the Glen Beck to your Orly Taitz) math the % is down because there's over 50k new accounts on TQ. Yes, I'm sure CCP is absolutely scrambling to find a way to spin that positively...
I don't know why the dev blog is delayed but I doubt the reason is remotely sinister, mostly because there's no reason to be and it would take considerable work to do for no imaginable gain. There is no reason for CSM7 to hide who actually supported the STV, except you, Two Step and Trebor. So if it is nothing sinister why don't you come out and tell us? Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Temba Ronin
218
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 01:14:00 -
[32] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Temba Ronin wrote:Are you incapable of grasping a new concept? You don't care who they vote for as long as they vote? Who made you king? Get over yourself, nothing ever goes up without coming down except self righteous windbags who need to "fix" other players so they vote.
Power To The Players! No one made me king, but unlike you I would like to see the CSM, the voice of the players, actually be representative of the Majority of players and how do we know what they want? We get them involved in the voting process and in the forums. How? By making the CSM more appealing to them and educating them as to why they should vote. Yes the current situation does better for the organised blocs, so they have a vested interest in keeping it that way but even they did not want the STV system originally, now that Null has 10 members on the CSM via it, they seem ok with it. So you seem more like the self righteous windbag, happy keeping things as they are now.
Again you just say things and pretend they are facts .....
I have said nothing to suggest that i do not want the CSM to be the voice of the players, or to not be representative of the majority of players, in fact I have said quite the opposite.
In fact i engaged in a lively discussion with The Mittani and some of his supporters right here in these forums when he redefined constituent to mean only the people who voted for him.
So my position and consistent stance is indeed verifiable beyond just this election cycle. However since i didn't agree with your extreme antics and verbal tantrums you simply created an alternate reality and spoke to that.
Who is this royal "we" you are referring to?
Surprise surprise large groups of players who fly together have more collective voter clout then smaller groups, stop the presses who would have thought such a think possible!
Power To The Players! |

Frying Doom
2458
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 04:49:00 -
[33] - Quote
Temba Ronin We get them involved in the voting process and in the forums. How? By making the CSM more appealing to them and educating them as to why they should vote.[/quote wrote: Who is this royal "we" you are referring to?
Well obviously not you.
You seem content for the CSM to wallow in minority, fighting thing that would improve CSMs appearance to the non-voter, while going on about how enlightened you are. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Temba Ronin
220
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 07:08:00 -
[34] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Temba Ronin We get them involved in the voting process and in the forums. How? By making the CSM more appealing to them and educating them as to why they should vote. Who is this royal "we" you are referring to?[/quote wrote: Well obviously not you.
You seem content for the CSM to wallow in minority, fighting thing that would improve CSMs appearance to the non-voter, while going on about how enlightened you are.
I am optimistic, I think CSM8 can be the best most effective CSM we have had, I want them to have my support to try. I did not vote for everyone who won but I have an interest in them all being successful.
You seem like such an unhappy person, this is a game you should be enjoying yourself. I am, lol, just declared war on some annoying pukes. My strategy is to keep the wardec going for about a month or two, surprising how foolish pilots get with the passage of a little time, they actually forget lol.
Play the game, go blow something up and or get blown up, it's a blast either way. Seems like you could mellow out if you did not take yourself so serious. Play the game dude, play the game!
Power To The Players! |

Frying Doom
2459
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 09:48:00 -
[35] - Quote
Temba Ronin wrote:Frying Doom wrote:Temba Ronin We get them involved in the voting process and in the forums. How? By making the CSM more appealing to them and educating them as to why they should vote. Who is this royal "we" you are referring to? Well obviously not you. You seem content for the CSM to wallow in minority, fighting thing that would improve CSMs appearance to the non-voter, while going on about how enlightened you are.[/quote wrote: I am optimistic, I think CSM8 can be the best most effective CSM we have had, I want them to have my support to try. I did not vote for everyone who won but I have an interest in them all being successful.
You seem like such an unhappy person, this is a game you should be enjoying yourself. I am, lol, just declared war on some annoying pukes. My strategy is to keep the wardec going for about a month or two, surprising how foolish pilots get with the passage of a little time, they actually forget lol.
Play the game, go blow something up and or get blown up, it's a blast either way. Seems like you could mellow out if you did not take yourself so serious. Play the game dude, play the game!
Power To The Players!
I love how because I would like to see a chairman elected for the good of the CSM, rather than just someones ego, I must be an unhappy person.
I am not so unhappy as to be fighting for the sake of my own ego, unlike some. It is amazing that some people need a chairman to be from Null to validate their existence. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Rengerel en Distel
Amarr Science and Industry
1391
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 15:17:00 -
[36] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote: I am not so unhappy as to be fighting for the sake of my own ego, unlike some. It is amazing that some people need a chairman to be from Null to validate their existence.
Unlike you who needs a chairman not from Null to validate their existence.
With the increase in shiptoasting, the Report timer needs to be shortened.
|

Frying Doom
2459
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 16:21:00 -
[37] - Quote
Rengerel en Distel wrote:Frying Doom wrote: I am not so unhappy as to be fighting for the sake of my own ego, unlike some. It is amazing that some people need a chairman to be from Null to validate their existence.
Unlike you who needs a chairman not from Null to validate their existence. I do so love the personal attacks from people who would prefer CSM members put their own egos before the good of the council. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

EvilweaselSA
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
644
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 16:49:00 -
[38] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote: I do so love the personal attacks from people who would prefer CSM members put their own egos before the good of the council.
you can't really complain about people using personal attacks when that's basically your stock in trade
what's good for the goose is good for the gander etc etc |

Snow Axe
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1286
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 20:02:00 -
[39] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:I do so love the personal attacks from people who would prefer CSM members put their own brains before my own ego.
I fixed that for you. You're welcome  "Look any reason why you need to talk like that? I have now reported you. I dont need to listen to your bad tone. If you cant have a grown up conversation then leave the thread[" |

Frying Doom
2459
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 23:30:00 -
[40] - Quote
Snow Axe wrote:Frying Doom wrote:I do so love the personal attacks from people who would prefer CSM members put their own brains before my own ego. I fixed that for you. You're welcome  No it is our ego that needs the Chairman to be from your alliance not mine.
Especially as the illusion of power is almost as good as the power its self. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Frying Doom
2459
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 23:31:00 -
[41] - Quote
EvilweaselSA wrote:Frying Doom wrote: I do so love the personal attacks from people who would prefer CSM members put their own egos before the good of the council.
you can't really complain about people using personal attacks when that's basically your stock in trade what's good for the goose is good for the gander etc etc This coming from you
 Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

EvilweaselSA
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
660
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 14:51:00 -
[42] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:This coming from you  see? you respond only with a personal attack. your posts are basically:
1) make unfounded assertion 2) personally attack all who disagree 3) goto 1
there's never any "and here's why: [facts, logical argument]" |

None ofthe Above
552
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 15:15:00 -
[43] - Quote
Back on topic... where are the damn ballots?
Exactly how much "formatting" has to be done? It defies reason. Dump it, compress it into an archive and stick it somewhere, link to it in devblog/press release. I hope you voted, you glorious but often apathetic bastards! STV working as intended; Pre-elections and Get out the Vote, room for improvement. |

Joe Buzzard
Buzzard Bait and Salvage VLLC
7
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 16:25:00 -
[44] - Quote
Times up.
Until now, extended delay - without additional communication as to why - just looked like incompetence. Now it just looks shady.
Dump it and/or explain delay, please. |

Varius Xeral
Galactic Trade Syndicate
813
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 16:49:00 -
[45] - Quote
Joe Buzzard wrote:Times up.
Until now, extended delay - without additional communication as to why - just looked like incompetence. Now it just looks shady.
Dump it and/or explain delay, please.
That's it, CCP, Joe Buzzard has drawn the line in the sand. You have been warned. |

Joe Buzzard
Buzzard Bait and Salvage VLLC
7
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 18:19:00 -
[46] - Quote
Varius Xeral wrote:Joe Buzzard wrote:Times up.
Until now, extended delay - without additional communication as to why - just looked like incompetence. Now it just looks shady.
Dump it and/or explain delay, please. That's it, CCP, Joe Buzzard has drawn the line in the sand. You have been warned.
That's right! Because a bald guy with a big head, photophobia and no chin just reeks of doom. 
Seriously though, more people will be putting on their tin foil hats soon. This is EVE - half the player base is insane and the other half isn't really all that normal. So please, don't let it get that far - it will be nothing but stupid needless drama. |

Snow Axe
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1293
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 18:47:00 -
[47] - Quote
Joe Buzzard wrote:Seriously though, more people will be putting on their tin foil hats soon. This is EVE - half the player base is insane and the other half isn't really all that normal. So please, don't let it get that far - it will be nothing but stupid needless drama.
It won't go that far over this. The only people who would be so stupid as to put on tinfoil hats over CCP being late on a devblog had them fashioned and ready to go long before the election even began. "Look any reason why you need to talk like that? I have now reported you. I dont need to listen to your bad tone. If you cant have a grown up conversation then leave the thread[" |

Frying Doom
2460
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 22:18:00 -
[48] - Quote
Snow Axe wrote:Joe Buzzard wrote:Seriously though, more people will be putting on their tin foil hats soon. This is EVE - half the player base is insane and the other half isn't really all that normal. So please, don't let it get that far - it will be nothing but stupid needless drama. It won't go that far over this. The only people who would be so stupid as to put on tinfoil hats over CCP being late on a devblog had them fashioned and ready to go long before the election even began. I do love your constant tinfoil attacks.
But anyway, they should just release the file and worry about their bev blog later, as it is apparently taking them forever.
Otherwise that file might end up in the same place the Dust minutes from the last summit went. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

corebloodbrothers
Volition Cult The Volition Cult
239
|
Posted - 2013.05.04 07:58:00 -
[49] - Quote
Well its obvious, there has been a calculation error, and now the rigged numbers need to match the current wrong outcome, the real voting results will show i am permanent attendee. So making up all votes is hard work that requires some time
Also the introduction of space elevators means fuelcost for activatign the elevator will push prices too the roof on , lukely u will be able too haul complete atroids and ice too the safety of your pos, with industrial capital tractor beams, so u can disassemble them in much safer environments, but thats vewy sekwet stuff, so sjjjjjj. It comes with the deploment of space solar panels which will fuell your stations in a more environmental way then its currently done. Eve cant ignore the reen push afterall. New blanket and paint bombs will be able to cover those, making station vulnerable cause pf power shortage. Aftehr which they can be unanchored and repakaged to eggs. Which will be in line with the implementation of scooping offline posses by anyone. Which will clear up ccp s database and free server space and decrease lag. With the introduction of the mega allaince cooperation and introduction of allaince fitings will enhance big coalitions so there will be collaboration on a truely big level. Lukely there will also soon be counters like the anti cyno ship, which will prevent on grid hotdrops, local delay, and the clear local hacking module in place to promote small scale roaming and death. Wormholes mechanism in null is gonna make eve more brutal . On that matter a secret recording tells about sleepers comming out of holes infesting high sec areas. With the wormhole entrance retractor hook u can keep the hole open and perma anchor it, but be carefull it can be blown up, just liek the future stargates to jove space that where mentioned on fanfest. All this comming soon, and this rigged election result, its a cover up story for the above mentioned , yet secret , ccp changes, **** tinfoil hat, where the suit!
|

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
9091
|
Posted - 2013.05.04 13:28:00 -
[50] - Quote
corebloodbrothers wrote:Well its obvious
You're doing it wrong.
Here, this may help.
1 Kings 12:11
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |