Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Female Achura Stargazer
State War Academy Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2013.05.24 09:56:00 -
[1] - Quote
Discuss. |

Dragonv2
unfair pleasure Elemental Tide
7
|
Posted - 2013.05.24 11:09:00 -
[2] - Quote
for the phoenix it'll be rather simple; remove the kinetic damage bonus and replace it with a flat bonus to all damage types. Other wise its it weapon system that needs to be fixed
as for the chimera i dont know much about the problems around it but i do know its a little low on CPU and so could use a bit more
just a note i cant even fly these 2 yet and my comments are based of things ive seen on the forums |

ChromeStriker
The Riot Formation Unclaimed.
541
|
Posted - 2013.05.24 11:35:00 -
[3] - Quote
Its not so much they have no problems in themselfs... its more everyone runs armour cap fleets, has armour caps and its not worth changing. - Nulla Curas |

Froggy Storm
Paxton Industries Gentlemen's Agreement
41
|
Posted - 2013.05.24 12:43:00 -
[4] - Quote
A number of recent threads have been talking about the adaptation lag between armor and shield fleets. In the sub cap world we have already seen some of that shift away from SIG armor fleets to more nimble shield doctrines. But given the time to build and cost of construction/ attrition it is a much slower process for caps.
But (as has been also stated) there have been increased whispers and rumors of chimera fleets being fielded.
As a "sub cap 4 life" kind of player this is all paraphrased from those other threads. However, I still don't see how to over come the slaves vs crystals issues. |

Tsukino Stareine
EVE University Ivy League
228
|
Posted - 2013.05.24 12:46:00 -
[5] - Quote
citadel torps/cruises are currently awful, combined with the rather limiting hull bonus of the pheonix means it's probably the worst dread.
I've seen chimeras being used in some of the RnK videos but it's mostly of them blowing up so................................ |

Jack Miton
Aperture Harmonics K162
1891
|
Posted - 2013.05.24 14:06:00 -
[6] - Quote
chimera is mostly fine, just needs like, 5% more CPU. phoenix needs the damage bonus to apply to all damage types. |

Lunkwill Khashour
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
141
|
Posted - 2013.05.24 20:38:00 -
[7] - Quote
Froggy Storm wrote:
As a "sub cap 4 life" kind of player this is all paraphrased from those other threads. However, I still don't see how to over come the slaves vs crystals issues.
Slaves aren't an issue anymore. An archon+slaves gets about equal hp as a chimera. |

Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
753
|
Posted - 2013.05.25 18:28:00 -
[8] - Quote
Jack Miton wrote:chimera is mostly fine, just needs like, 5% more CPU.
And less cap transfer dependency since it's so easy to disrupt for a ship of this size and value, but it's only my opinion.
Also: since we can't refit anymore using your own fitting service this makes it even less appealing versus Thany or Archon. *removed inappropriate ASCII art signature* - CCP Eterne |

Ryuu Shi
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
43
|
Posted - 2013.05.26 07:23:00 -
[9] - Quote
Lunkwill Khashour wrote:Froggy Storm wrote:
As a "sub cap 4 life" kind of player this is all paraphrased from those other threads. However, I still don't see how to over come the slaves vs crystals issues.
Slaves aren't an issue anymore. An archon+slaves gets about equal hp as a chimera.
er no. I have both carriers and the archon alone has 200 mill more EHP than the chimera. Now add slaves and you got a heck of alot more EHP for the archon. The problem is that shield caps need something of equal implants as slaves and armor sub-caps needs something of equal implants as crystals.
Until then armor caps are king with slave implants (archons are easier to fit too!) Ganking miners has gone too far. Ganking is wrong, and bad. There should be a new, stronger word for Ganking like badwrong or badong. Yes, Ganking is badong. From this moment, I will stand for the opposite of Ganking, gnodab. - Said no-one, ever. |

Sarah Telestrion
Telestrion Holdings
0
|
Posted - 2013.05.26 09:10:00 -
[10] - Quote
Ryuu Shi wrote:er no. I have both carriers and the archon alone has 200 thousand more EHP than the chimera. Now add slaves and you got a heck of alot more EHP for the archon. The problem is that shield caps need something of equal implants as slaves and armor sub-caps needs something of equal implants as crystals. Until then armor caps are king with slave implants (archons are easier to fit too!) 
Implants are completly irrelevant in large capital-fleets, unless we are talking about supers(which we obviously are not). As the capital-clone is often the same clone used for Rokhs, Abaddons, Maelstroms, etc. you will rarely find Slave-Sets in a Carrier-Pod(still talking about large capital-fleets), just check the killboards.
We might very well see Chimeras used as a defensive tool when it-¦s about defending POSes, stations and other Sov-Structures. The reason why armor-fleets will still be king on the offensive is because the structure-grind makes you want to bring your super-fleet to finish it quickly and super-fleets are and will be armor for a very long time.
|

culo duro
Somali Coast Guard BootCamp
97
|
Posted - 2013.05.26 09:25:00 -
[11] - Quote
Female Achura Stargazer wrote:Discuss.
My guess would be that it's because you can fit a passive tank on the Archon and it'd work great... Not so much the chimaera. |

Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
755
|
Posted - 2013.05.26 12:34:00 -
[12] - Quote
culo duro wrote:Female Achura Stargazer wrote:Discuss. My guess would be that it's because you can fit a passive tank on the Archon and it'd work great... Not so much the chimaera.
Also this.
At capital size we have nothing compared with Layered plating (+15 or +20% Armor) even if shields are intended to be active tank vs armor buffer tank you still have this awkward thing going on where you can't keep an active tank very long without huge number of grid/cap modules reducing by that much all other fitting possibilities.
I'm not very used to fly my Chimaera on my alt, actually I only use it very little or to just move crap around while I'd most probably rat in if it was a Thany or Archon which is the next goal for my main char if POD prices get reasonable levels. *removed inappropriate ASCII art signature* - CCP Eterne |

TomyLobo
U2EZ
114
|
Posted - 2013.05.27 01:27:00 -
[13] - Quote
Capital shield repairers consume more cap than capital armor repairers. This is the case while the archon has a higher base capacitor amount than the chimera; the higher capacitor recharge rate on the chimera doesn't balance things out. Also, the archon can make use of both cap rechargers and cap power relays without having to put up with the penalties. These areas are where the problems lie. |

Jack Miton
Aperture Harmonics K162
1893
|
Posted - 2013.05.27 02:25:00 -
[14] - Quote
Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote:Jack Miton wrote:chimera is mostly fine, just needs like, 5% more CPU. And less cap transfer dependency since it's so easy to disrupt for a ship of this size and value, but it's only my opinion. say what? chimera has the best cap of any carrier so not really sure what youre on about. |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Heretic Initiative
3711
|
Posted - 2013.05.27 03:41:00 -
[15] - Quote
Sarah Telestrion wrote:Ryuu Shi wrote:er no. I have both carriers and the archon alone has 200 thousand more EHP than the chimera. Now add slaves and you got a heck of alot more EHP for the archon. The problem is that shield caps need something of equal implants as slaves and armor sub-caps needs something of equal implants as crystals. Until then armor caps are king with slave implants (archons are easier to fit too!)  Implants are completly irrelevant in large capital-fleets, unless we are talking about supers(which we obviously are not). As the capital-clone is often the same clone used for Rokhs, Abaddons, Maelstroms, etc. you will rarely find Slave-Sets in a Carrier-Pod(still talking about large capital-fleets), just check the killboards. We might very well see Chimeras used as a defensive tool when it-¦s about defending POSes, stations and other Sov-Structures. The reason why armor-fleets will still be king on the offensive is because the structure-grind makes you want to bring your super-fleet to finish it quickly and super-fleets are and will be armor for a very long time.
Implants are not completely irrelevant at the capital level. I'd say they still play a role in WH space capital use. I guess that's where all the pimp fit meta/faction module capitals are as well.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos
Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Dato Koppla
Rage of Inferno Malefic Motives
213
|
Posted - 2013.05.27 03:46:00 -
[16] - Quote
Chimaera can temporarily get more EHP than a Slaved Archon by overheating it's hardeners, even if the Archon overheats it's hardeners as well, if that counts for something. |

Jack Miton
Aperture Harmonics K162
1893
|
Posted - 2013.05.27 04:59:00 -
[17] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:Sarah Telestrion wrote:Ryuu Shi wrote:er no. I have both carriers and the archon alone has 200 thousand more EHP than the chimera. Now add slaves and you got a heck of alot more EHP for the archon. The problem is that shield caps need something of equal implants as slaves and armor sub-caps needs something of equal implants as crystals. Until then armor caps are king with slave implants (archons are easier to fit too!)  Implants are completly irrelevant in large capital-fleets, unless we are talking about supers(which we obviously are not). As the capital-clone is often the same clone used for Rokhs, Abaddons, Maelstroms, etc. you will rarely find Slave-Sets in a Carrier-Pod(still talking about large capital-fleets), just check the killboards. We might very well see Chimeras used as a defensive tool when it-¦s about defending POSes, stations and other Sov-Structures. The reason why armor-fleets will still be king on the offensive is because the structure-grind makes you want to bring your super-fleet to finish it quickly and super-fleets are and will be armor for a very long time. Implants are not completely irrelevant at the capital level. I'd say they still play a role in WH space capital use. I guess that's where all the pimp fit meta/faction module capitals are as well. -Liang the only implants that have any real bearing on carriers are capacitor implants. dedicated carrier pilots in WHs will almost always have the 2 genolution implants and both 5% cap implants.
slaves are a waste on carriers in pretty much any situation I can think of tbh. if youre triage fit, the extra EHP is irrelevant and if youre buffer RR fit, youre going to be in a large scale fleet where it wont make any difference either.
|

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Heretic Initiative
3711
|
Posted - 2013.05.27 10:46:00 -
[18] - Quote
Jack Miton wrote: the only implants that have any real bearing on carriers are capacitor implants. dedicated carrier pilots in WHs will almost always have the 2 genolution implants and both 5% cap implants.
slaves are a waste on carriers in pretty much any situation I can think of tbh. if youre triage fit, the extra EHP is irrelevant and if youre buffer RR fit, youre going to be in a large scale fleet where it wont make any difference either.
I'd literally never noticed the cap bonus on those Genolutions. That's really nice.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos
Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Tau Cabalander
Retirement Retreat Working Stiffs
1862
|
Posted - 2013.05.27 22:05:00 -
[19] - Quote
Jack Miton wrote:say what? chimera has the best cap of any carrier so not really sure what youre on about. The Chimera could use an extra low slot and some more CPU, as it is pretty much a requirement to have the lows currently filled with faction power relays, which is ridiculous.
There just isn't room for a DCU II either, and using less than 4 power relays doesn't make sense, because of the cap recharge bonus not being stacking penalized but the shield boost drawback is stacking penalized. CPR still reduce the tank, unlike the armor carriers (and using rechargers in the mids). CCP Fozzie also wants to nerf the resist bonus too.
The Chimera also tends to be slow recovering capacitor, which is especially noticeable after jumping. Operating with 10% cap isn't really practical as it is with an Archon.
Next try to fit a full rack of shield transporters (3 is not very practical, which is another reason why the Dominion trailer is wacked). The Archon can have a full rack of remote armor reps.
Thankfully Odyssey will make it trivial to crosstrain other carriers. |

Jack Miton
Aperture Harmonics K162
1893
|
Posted - 2013.05.27 22:41:00 -
[20] - Quote
Tau Cabalander wrote:Jack Miton wrote:say what? chimera has the best cap of any carrier so not really sure what youre on about. The Chimera could use an extra low slot and some more CPU, as it is pretty much a requirement to have the lows currently filled with faction power relays, which is ridiculous. There just isn't room for a DCU II either, and using less than 4 power relays doesn't make sense, because of the cap recharge bonus not being stacking penalized but the shield boost penalty is stacking penalized. CPR still reduce the tank, unlike the armor carriers (and using rechargers in the mids). CCP Fozzie also wants to nerf the resist bonus too. The Chimera also tends to be slow recovering capacitor, which is especially noticeable after jumping and having to jump again; the Chimeras always seem to be last to be ready. Also operating with 10% cap isn't really practical as it is with an Archon. Shield repping is also less energy efficient than armor repping. Next try to fit a full rack of shield transporters (3 and a local rep is not very practical, which is another reason why the Dominion trailer is wacked). The Archon can have a full rack of remote armor reps. you dont really fly a chimera do you? the only thing youre right about is that shield tanking takes slightly more cap. comparing a standard archon triage fit to a standard chimera triage fit: tank is identical (3 slot tank, same meta level) cap recharge is identical (+852/s) both fit 3 remote reps/transfers and 1 cap transfer.
only difference is that the chimera needs to fit 2 meta high slots due to CPU where the archon doesnt.
now, start throwing isk at both, like WH people are want to do, and see what happens. chimera gets WAY better than the archon with high levels of pimp in all stats. |

Tau Cabalander
Retirement Retreat Working Stiffs
1862
|
Posted - 2013.05.28 00:41:00 -
[21] - Quote
Jack Miton wrote:you dont really fly a chimera do you? Do you ever start a post without an attack? You know it is okay to just disagree once in a while. Or even shock people by just being constructive without being hostile. I don't doubt that you have more experience than me, though I do claim it differs (eg. we've never been in the same fleet).
I do currently own a Chimera, and have used it. I also have an Archon pilot and a Thanatos pilot. I don't have a Nid' pilot yet.
Jack Miton wrote:the only thing youre right about is that shield tanking takes slightly more cap. 1500 GJ vs. 1350 GJ = 11% more capacitor is "slightly more"? Your scale must differ from mine, as I consider that significant.
Jack Miton wrote:both fit 3 remote reps/transfers and 1 cap transfer. Try to fit a Pantheon style 5 reps on both, or even 4+1. I could never get it to work on a Chimera.
With 3+1 a local shield booster is out of the question (at least the last time I tried to fit that it was - I haven't tried since), and the best I could manage was 2+1 for triage. I'll have to try again this evening.
Jack Miton wrote:now, start throwing isk at both, like WH people are want to do, and see what happens. chimera gets WAY better than the archon with high levels of pimp in all stats. I don't think it is practical to balance assuming pimped ships. I suspect CCP might state the same.
Beyond faction relays on a Chimera, I never pimped a w-space carrier. I don't doubt you've run into some expensive Pi+¦atas in w-space given my years of living there. Some people are nutz, others are rich and nutz. |

Hamatitio
Aperture Harmonics K162
111
|
Posted - 2013.05.28 02:05:00 -
[22] - Quote
Reduce the CPU required by capital shield modules (both local and remote).
This will be a help across the board for capital class shield ships...
The Phoenix is a terrible dread, unless you are bashing a minmatar POS. |

TomyLobo
U2EZ
115
|
Posted - 2013.05.28 02:43:00 -
[23] - Quote
double post. Whelp!! |

TomyLobo
U2EZ
115
|
Posted - 2013.05.28 02:44:00 -
[24] - Quote
Jack Miton wrote:Tau Cabalander wrote:Jack Miton wrote:say what? chimera has the best cap of any carrier so not really sure what youre on about. Next try to fit a full rack of shield transporters (3 and a local rep is not very practical, which is another reason why the Dominion trailer is wacked). The Archon can have a full rack of remote armor reps. you dont really fly a chimera do you? the only thing youre right about is that shield tanking takes slightly more cap. comparing a standard archon triage fit to a standard chimera triage fit: tank is identical (3 slot tank, same meta level) cap recharge is identical (+852/s) both fit 3 remote reps/transfers and 1 cap transfer. only difference is that the chimera needs to fit 2 meta high slots due to CPU where the archon doesnt. now, start throwing isk at both, like WH people are want to do, and see what happens. chimera gets WAY better than the archon with high levels of pimp in all stats. The chimera, without any skills factored in, actually gets better cap recharge rate but due to low cap amount, it still caps out faster than the archon while doing pretty much the same thing. You end up burning considerably more cap for the same effect. Not to talk about having to nerf shield boost amount by 30% or more just to end up barely cap stable. No matter what you do, It just doesn't get the job done like the archon and it was much worse before the slight buff which was not too long ago. There's one thing we can both agree on, though, and that is the fact that the chimera gets much better if you bling it out but the same thing goes for any other ship.
|

Mr Floydy
Questionable Ethics. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
93
|
Posted - 2013.05.28 12:57:00 -
[25] - Quote
Pimped Chimera's can have some pretty epic stats, the one our corp used to have had an insane tank and neuts just weren't an issue. My only wish to make it more popular would be some more CPU to make it easier to fit, I've never ran out of cpu/grid on an Archon fit, whilst you have to be careful on cpu for most chimera fits I can recall ever trying. (granted I've not looked in a while) |

Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
758
|
Posted - 2013.05.28 15:59:00 -
[26] - Quote
Jack Miton wrote:Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote:Jack Miton wrote:chimera is mostly fine, just needs like, 5% more CPU. And less cap transfer dependency since it's so easy to disrupt for a ship of this size and value, but it's only my opinion. say what? chimera has the best cap of any carrier so not really sure what youre on about.
As I just said above I'm not very used to fly it and this is the feeling I get with, most probably because my fit it's not officer/faction stuff or even a good fit+I'm not pretending to know how to fly it perfectly, just a feeling and probably a wrong one but I'd like to read from someone who thinks these are perfect like you seem to be, explain a little better this ship fittings solo etc. *removed inappropriate ASCII art signature* - CCP Eterne |

Deerin
Murientor Tribe Defiant Legacy
177
|
Posted - 2013.05.28 18:16:00 -
[27] - Quote
Can someone post a reference fit for chimera to make comparisons on? |

DJ Sexman
Infinite Covenant Tribal Band
0
|
Posted - 2013.05.28 19:03:00 -
[28] - Quote
Phoenix, I don't know. Across the board missile damage bonus would be nice. Beyond that, I'd love to have the torps' velocity significantly increased. Same max range but putting them at the level of the citadel cruise speed would be cool. It's just annoying when you have missiles out and you leave siege, they don't do siege damage.
Fixing citadel missiles vs. other caps would be #1 on the list though. |

Drake Doe
SVER True Blood
256
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 00:32:00 -
[29] - Quote
Citadel missiles, cpu issues, and the lack of capital shield buffer mods. I think that sums it up. "The homogenization of EVE began when Gallente and Caldari started sharing a weapon system."---Vermaak Doe-- "Ohh squabbles ohh I love my dust trolls like watching an episode of Maury with less " Is he my Dad " but more of " My Neighbor took a dump on my lawn " good episode! *pops more corn*" ---Evernub-- |

RavenPaine
RaVeN Alliance
472
|
Posted - 2013.07.31 01:22:00 -
[30] - Quote
Drake Doe wrote:Citadel missiles, cpu issues, and the lack of capital shield buffer mods. I think that sums it up.
So basicly, Tank, Gank, and Fitting all suck for the Phoenix. lol.
I didn't go to such lengths to analyze the ship statistics. For me the hull was just plain Fugly. I can't be paying subs to fly ugly ships! |
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |