| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Detaurus
   |
Posted - 2005.11.09 23:49:00 -
[1]
Well many of you know me, and even more have experienced my wrath on more than one occasion, especially that Japanese fellow named Istvaan Shogatsu. I have killed him on more than one occasion.
What I speak of concerning INTERCEPTORS is wholly accurate. The PROTECTED class of TACKLER must go. The concept of completely ruining the capacity of a blastership to mwd to its opponent by use of inty webs and warp scramblers. The interceptors characteristic invulnerability to all missiles, their capacity to work unencumbered of far to many drones, which are no doubt going to be made much much slower(due to the drone speed increasing skill intoduction, their insanely high DPS, especially the CROWS, which is not only the flavor of the month, but perhaps the year, reignging DPS hell on all that stand before it at a higher rate than a raven equipping similar modules. The issue remains, concerning their tackling, not of their damage potential(which is both staggering and ridiculous), for battleships can infintely tank it, but their CAPACITY to render a battleship HELPLESS to a mob, without any short term risk, given its extended ability to last more than sufficient amount of time than a ship of its worth actually should. Those that act petty and declare war are wasting their money, as my corp is all me. so buzz off.
I hate TOMb  Lover
|
Tiuwaz
|
Posted - 2005.11.09 23:56:00 -
[2]
5 things sprung to my mind when i read that post
1. Cookie?
2. Someone got pwned?
3. equip a nos or a smarti or a use webber and drones, there are about a zillion posts on this forum how you can squash inties or frigs with a BS
4. who would you like to tackle then? a BS? uhm yeah sure, cruiser? gets wtfbbqed by BS , a BC? dont make me laugh
5 fit stabs it seems to fit your attitude on this issue
inties are fine, leave them alone
 Originally by: Oveur
****! Lets nerf it!
To the nerfmobile!
|
Ortu Konsinni
|
Posted - 2005.11.09 23:59:00 -
[3]
Run away, it's Detaurus. It hasn't been long enough since I last saw you post.
---
Ortu Konsinni
Diplomatic delegate
French Force Alliance -- l'alliance des francophones
Web site : http://destabiliser.com/ffa/ |
Azuriel Talloth
|
Posted - 2005.11.10 00:03:00 -
[4]
Interceptors die extremely fast once you have them pinned down. Maybe you should try flying your battleship with either your own frigate support or with anti-frigate support, like your enemies seem to be doing?
"Making no mistakes is what establishes the certainty of victory,
for it means conquering an enemy that is already defeated." |
Vasche
|
Posted - 2005.11.10 00:09:00 -
[5]
As an interceptor pilot all I have to say is this... webber.
-----------------------
|
Detaurus
|
Posted - 2005.11.10 00:19:00 -
[6]
for those that suggest webifiers. Damage before web 19, damage after web 26.
A complete waste of a precious mid slot.
|
jbob2000
|
Posted - 2005.11.10 00:24:00 -
[7]
You're a fkin tard. 1 Heavy nos = dead inty. I don't care what you say. When the inties have no more cap, you warp away. If you can scramble and web them, they're dead. DON'T ARGUE, if you can't kill a webbed and nossed inty, then quit.
|
Malthros Zenobia
|
Posted - 2005.11.10 00:27:00 -
[8]
Try a second web, then try to see if your drones can kill the inty before you reload a turret, odds are they will. Also, if you're hitting it with cruise missiles or torps, the only way you're going to do full damage it to double-triple web it then hit it with about 10 painters.
And to quote someone's sigs, since you seem to us a BS:
The Battleships is not suppose to be a solo pwnmobile. -Oveur
Ofcourse from what I've heard, an AF can generally smoke an Inty.
------------------------------------
Your Civilian Gatling Railgun perfectly strikes Choke Slam [CAIN], wrecking for 6.0 damage. |
Detaurus
|
Posted - 2005.11.10 00:33:00 -
[9]
Yes, I am aware of CCP's bias against solo players. the concept of opposing an interceptor, utilizing half of ones mid slots and specially fitted high slots, is quite funny, and indicative of their essential bias. 2 webs? give me a break, and it is not combat that is the intent, but ELIMINATING the threat of a tackler before his squad arrives. As I have stated before, the BURDEN is always on the solo gamer, and never on the solo tackler. This is represenative of an essential belief of ccp that no one shoujld be able to play the game alone, and those that do must be wasily dispatched by the universal instrument of victory, the unhittable, overpowered interceptor. You should all be glad that I am a missile user,As turrets cannot even hit them.
|
Montero
|
Posted - 2005.11.10 00:36:00 -
[10]
it's ok, i've called the waaaambulance.
i fly intys. they arent invulnerable by any stretch. a web and a nos will have most inty pilots crawling home in a pod.
|
Detaurus
|
Posted - 2005.11.10 00:37:00 -
[11]
AF are anti inty, other than that they are useless. Now assault cruisers..... Take one, oh sure ill just ake an AF when I tank those 2 1.5 mil battleships in 0.0.
|
Montero
|
Posted - 2005.11.10 00:41:00 -
[12]
Originally by: Detaurus
AF are anti inty, other than that they are useless. Now assault cruisers..... Take one, oh sure ill just ake an AF when I tank those 2 1.5 mil battleships in 0.0.
what are you on about?
|
Detaurus
|
Posted - 2005.11.10 00:46:00 -
[13]
How much cap does the crow use to shoot its weapons.
|
Ortu Konsinni
|
Posted - 2005.11.10 00:54:00 -
[14]
A single Crow firing standard missiles from a safe distance isn't going to kill a battleship. Why? Because the Crow would need faction modules to keep its target in place. Large nos range = 20+ km. Warp disruptor range = 20km (that's assuming the Crow is using a warp disruptor). If the Crow is any further than that, the BS can just warp away if its pilot wants to. So maybe the BS can't kill the Crow, but the Crow most certainly can't hold the BS in place, much less kill it.
Now stop trolling.
---
Ortu Konsinni
Diplomatic delegate
French Force Alliance -- l'alliance des francophones
Web site : http://destabiliser.com/ffa/ |
Naughty Boy
|
Posted - 2005.11.10 00:59:00 -
[15]
Edited by: Naughty Boy on 10/11/2005 01:02:37
At the risk of feeding the troll.
An interceptor will not kill solo a decently tanked battleship.
Most interceptors cannot deal more than ~120 dps, the maximum damage being done by one is 200 dps (maxed skill taranis fitted for max damage and no tank whatsoever, nor ability to scramble).
A decent shield tank (1 large/xlarge shield booster 1 amp 3 hardeners) can tank >250 dps forever, as a decent armor tank (1 large rep 1 med rep 3 hardeners) can tank >300 dps forever.
I can safely say that a lone interceptor can't possibly break a decent battleship tank alone before the next downtime. Nor after. So, if anything, you'd better changing your position and admit that the game is not fair as solo interceptor pilots are at a disadvantage: a battleship can solo kill interceptors, but an interceptor can't kill a decently tanked battleship solo. Hence, the dev are clearly favoring battleship users which is totally unfair for interceptor pilots. They should be able to play and kill solo as much as battleships. I hereby request a nerf/buff/cookie.
And finally, the crow is the less damaging of the damage-oriented interceptors, so it proves how much you are knowledgeable on the subject.
Good day sir.
Sincerly Yours, The Naughty Boy.
|
Detaurus
|
Posted - 2005.11.10 01:03:00 -
[16]
Lol, I am quite aware of the superiority of taranis, and all things Gallente
|
Montero
|
Posted - 2005.11.10 01:05:00 -
[17]
Originally by: Detaurus
Lol, I am quite aware of the superiority of taranis, and all things Gallente
a minute ago you said the crow was superior.
|
Detaurus
|
Posted - 2005.11.10 01:07:00 -
[18]
The crow is a thorn in the side of any battleship pilot yes. Have a few orbiting crows, and find out. Oh you can run, and indeed oveur tomb or whatever, would have gotten what they want, a battleship the plaything of newbs, and the secret joke of the enitre game establishment.
|
Montero
|
Posted - 2005.11.10 01:11:00 -
[19]
if your problem is killing intys rather than escaping them why dont you fly something which is good at killing intys, rather than a battleship?
|
Malthros Zenobia
|
Posted - 2005.11.10 01:16:00 -
[20]
Originally by: Detaurus
Yes, I am aware of CCP's bias against solo players. the concept of opposing an interceptor, utilizing half of ones mid slots and specially fitted high slots, is quite funny, and indicative of their essential bias. 2 webs? give me a break, and it is not combat that is the intent, but ELIMINATING the threat of a tackler before his squad arrives. As I have stated before, the BURDEN is always on the solo gamer, and never on the solo tackler. This is represenative of an essential belief of ccp that no one shoujld be able to play the game alone, and those that do must be wasily dispatched by the universal instrument of victory, the unhittable, overpowered interceptor. You should all be glad that I am a missile user,As turrets cannot even hit them.
Maybe it's on the solo player because a Tackler is doing his duty in tackling, and the solo player is trying to do everything? Even a single web is going to slow down a MWD'ing inty enough for drones to hit it some, and a Heavy NOS will pretty much drain him dry, diabling his MWD, his tank, and oh, don't forget your web means he's going about 40m/s, so your drones catchup and pwn him into a pod.
------------------------------------
Your Civilian Gatling Railgun perfectly strikes Choke Slam [CAIN], wrecking for 6.0 damage. |
Vladmir Dracu
|
Posted - 2005.11.10 01:26:00 -
[21]
i think hes right in away, interctors are a problem, i think it should be harder to warp inhibit a bs becouse of the its size and becouse i spend 108.mil on a raven and it cost 17mil to get a a frigete size crow hehehe
|
Istvaan Shogaatsu
|
Posted - 2005.11.10 01:29:00 -
[22]
Well hello Detaurus.
Detaurus > for gods sake leave me alone
Detaurus > I can't even get a fresh clone without you podding me
Feaux and I are going to have to work your new corp over and send you away for another couple months, it seems. See you soon.
|
Vladmir Dracu
|
Posted - 2005.11.10 01:31:00 -
[23]
get him not us hehe he talks to much not us
|
Detaurus
|
Posted - 2005.11.10 01:38:00 -
[24]
heh, nice lines, but they are not mine. In any case, do your best. I ruined SWG, maybe EVE is next, muhahahahahahahahah.
|
Istvaan Shogaatsu
|
Posted - 2005.11.10 01:42:00 -
[25]
Sure they are. Remember that day we podded you five times in a few hours because you ran your mouth? I saved your delicious squeals in my trophy log folder.
You're really fun to hurt, you know?
|
Vladmir Dracu
|
Posted - 2005.11.10 01:50:00 -
[26]
i would like to get that file and look at it hhehehe
|
Detaurus
|
Posted - 2005.11.10 01:56:00 -
[27]
ISTVAAN dont lie, you little l33t dood meet me in
3-BADZ
|
Istvaan Shogaatsu
|
Posted - 2005.11.10 02:38:00 -
[28]
Edited by: Istvaan Shogaatsu on 10/11/2005 02:38:21
Originally by: Detaurus
ISTVAAN dont lie, you little l33t dood meet me in
3-BADZ
Quote:
2005.11.10 02:36:00
The sleazebag is currently at Lower Debyl VIII - Moon 15 - Chemal Tech Factory station in the Abthi constellation of Devoid region.
With regards,
Mandan Oittiken.
3-BADZ, huh? Come now, we both know you're too weak to set foot in 0.0
|
Maya Rkell
|
Posted - 2005.11.10 02:44:00 -
[29]
Istvaan,
I for one am looking foward to the FRAPS of your next encounter with him.
"Corpse cannot be fitted onto ship. Only hardware modules can be fitted." |
Idara
|
Posted - 2005.11.10 02:45:00 -
[30]
Originally by: Istvaan Shogaatsu
Edited by: Istvaan Shogaatsu on 10/11/2005 02:38:21
Originally by: Detaurus
ISTVAAN dont lie, you little l33t dood meet me in
3-BADZ
Quote:
2005.11.10 02:36:00
The sleazebag is currently at Lower Debyl VIII - Moon 15 - Chemal Tech Factory station in the Abthi constellation of Devoid region.
With regards,
Mandan Oittiken.
3-BADZ, huh? Come now, we both know you're too weak to set foot in 0.0
pwned?
--------------------------------------------------------
Lance Corporal
BSC Military
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |