|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Sarcasim
The Free Haven Group The Union of Free Worlds
8
|
Posted - 2013.06.19 13:37:00 -
[1] - Quote
E-2C Hawkeye wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:E-2C Hawkeye wrote:Shizuken wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:
Game developers shouldn't be in the habit of compensating for the weakness or lazyness of players.
The hypocrisy in this statement is statement is severe. It is not weak, or lazy, to ask that a game not automatically transmit your presence in a system to any passerby. In fact, it is lazy to fit a single module to a ship and then park yourself in a system forcing other people to ratchet up their effort, manpower, and equipment. That gives too much power to one person. All most would ask for is that if you have a cloak, that you have to do more than be logged in to harass people. People like you, I am sure, ***** and moan about afk miners, and how carebears just want to be able to sit in a belt and watch TV while they game. So, why is it then that you think a random antagonist should be able to gain some benefit from similar behavior. +10 Translation: I'm still butt hurt from all the whipping Jenn keeps giving me, so let someone else fight for a change lol. It doesn't surprise me that you jump on the weak and lazy bandwagon. Jenn I place you and tipia in the same category. You both have a insatiable need for attention and you resort to trolling to get a thread locked you donGÇÖt like or agree with and you both lack the ability to see any other perspective other than your own. I simply liked his statement and agreed with that statement. I am not surprised you felt the need to comment on it. Moving forward I will not be an enabler for either you or tipia and shall choose to ignore your childish trolling attempts and narcissistic behavior. +10 |

Sarcasim
The Free Haven Group The Union of Free Worlds
9
|
Posted - 2013.06.19 14:32:00 -
[2] - Quote
Classic thread derailing....well done |

Sarcasim
The Free Haven Group The Union of Free Worlds
9
|
Posted - 2013.06.19 14:52:00 -
[3] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Ayuren Aakiwa wrote:Removing local is a terrible idea supported by terrible people. That's because it's a solution to a terrible GÇ£problemGÇ¥ GÇö not in the sense that the problem is truly horrific, but that the problem is horribly poorly defined. The removal of local is the perfect GÇ£solutionGÇ¥ to the GÇ£problemGÇ¥ of AFK cloakers. As luck would have it, AFK cloakers are not a problem to begin with, so the solution isn't needed either. Everyone wins! \o/ Luck? How about truth? Truth is afk cloaking is a issue. Local allows you to see it. Don't pull your eyes out bc you don't like what you see in the mirror.
Change whats in the mirror not ur ability to see the issue. |

Sarcasim
The Free Haven Group The Union of Free Worlds
9
|
Posted - 2013.06.19 16:07:00 -
[4] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Sarcasim wrote:Tippia wrote:Ayuren Aakiwa wrote:Removing local is a terrible idea supported by terrible people. That's because it's a solution to a terrible GÇ£problemGÇ¥ GÇö not in the sense that the problem is truly horrific, but that the problem is horribly poorly defined. The removal of local is the perfect GÇ£solutionGÇ¥ to the GÇ£problemGÇ¥ of AFK cloakers. As luck would have it, AFK cloakers are not a problem to begin with, so the solution isn't needed either. Everyone wins! \o/ Luck? How about truth? Truth is afk cloaking is a issue. Local allows you to see it. Don't pull your eyes out bc you don't like what you see in the mirror. Change whats in the mirror not ur ability to see the issue. Sometimes people are too dumb to do their null sec pve activities in groups. I heard one guy claim that the rest of his corp was asleep when he was online so he had no back up. GEE GOLLY it couldn't be his incorrect choice in corps to join could it? NO its afk cloakers and local.
Dumb is arguing on the internet. I am not like you and your friends. I will not be drawn into your game of stupidity so that you can beat me with experience.
Many people have pointed out numerous valid points on how AFK cloaking effects others. You as well as others argued in previous threads against AFK ice mining using interaction as one of your points. Now you argue against AFK cloaking?? Same difference in my opinion. AFK is AFK if itGÇÖs the miner or the cloaker. The cloaker gets a lot more bang for his AFK buck then the miner ever did.
You and your buddies refuse to see it because you donGÇÖt want to lose this overpowered tool of AFK cloaking gives. ItGÇÖs not weather itGÇÖs a issue but you donGÇÖt want to loose it. |

Sarcasim
The Free Haven Group The Union of Free Worlds
9
|
Posted - 2013.06.19 17:10:00 -
[5] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:Tippia wrote:Incorrect. Your main problhttps://forums.eveonline.com/themes/ccpEveOnline/pix-trans.pngem is that you automatically equate Gǣasking hard questionsGǥ and Gǣquestioning unproven assumptions and claimsGǥ to trolling. In reality, it's the opposite: if you can't stand hard question and if you can't prove your assumptions or claims, you are the troll. That's all I'm doing: exposing the trolls. They really don't like that and have a tendency to call people trolls for doing soGǪ but, of course, as always, without any kind of proof to back that claim up. I just wanted to highlight that point. I sometimes post out of irritation, irritated by the fact that someone posts a stupid/unfounded/unprovable thing, gets called on it, and all of a sudden the person pointing out the flaw is the bad guy. Why not just THINK before posting and develop good reasoning skills? Because that's too damn hard, that's why lol. Just easier to label the half of the universe that doesn't agree with you as "troll" (trollverse?) and be done with it. And that is both weak and lazy.... ..in the same way that running to a forum and asking CCP to fix something that doesn't need fixing and is easily aviodable is weak and lazy. I must simply be doing it wrong, flying Machariels and Rattlesnakes around null sec (usually solo) making isk by the crapload while ignoring (or rarely, killing) cloakers that try to gank me or camp my system. I should have just docked up and spent that time badgering CCP ti fix the game for me.... You should be on the CSM. Omg yea bc we really need another Mintchip event..
|

Sarcasim
The Free Haven Group The Union of Free Worlds
9
|
Posted - 2013.06.19 17:44:00 -
[6] - Quote
Onomerous wrote:Quote:You as well as others argued in previous threads against AFK ice mining using interaction as one of your points. Now you argue against AFK cloaking?? Same difference in my opinion. AFK is AFK if itGÇÖs the miner or the cloaker.
WTF??? AFK cloaking vs. AFK mining? Even remotely related? How much money does an AFK cloaker make because I'm willing to sign up for it!!
As stated in previous post the cloaker gets paid in intel while at the keyboard but gets paid while afk with the ability to effect other players all just from being logged in and not even ingame. |

Sarcasim
The Free Haven Group The Union of Free Worlds
9
|
Posted - 2013.06.19 17:47:00 -
[7] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Sarcasim wrote:Omg yea bc we really need another Mintchip event.. A what?
I would say go ahead and run if you feel your EGO would be able to handel it should you not get elected.  |

Sarcasim
The Free Haven Group The Union of Free Worlds
9
|
Posted - 2013.06.19 17:54:00 -
[8] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Sarcasim wrote:As stated in previous post the cloaker gets paid in intel while at the keyboard but gets paid while afk with the ability to effect other players all just from being logged in and not even ingame. GǪif those other players choose to give him that. They can also choose not to. Either way, he won't know since he's AFK. It's not much in the way of a GǣgainGǥ tbh. Jenn aSide wrote:Intel and 50 cents will buy you a cup of coffee lol. That's some cheap coffeeGǪ 
I would have to agree with other posters who argue against afk play. I like the new ice mining change and feel it should be extended to include cloaking. If you canGÇÖt be bothered to be in game then you should not be in game cloaked. Please explain how clicking a button to remain cloaked would effect a cloaked player present at KB playing the game? |

Sarcasim
The Free Haven Group The Union of Free Worlds
9
|
Posted - 2013.06.19 18:02:00 -
[9] - Quote
Tippia wrote:[quote=Sarcasim] It's not much in the way of a GÇ£gainGÇ¥ tbh. Quote:I would say go ahead and run if you feel your EGO would be able to handel it should you not get elected. So I have your endorsement, then. Goodie. Do I have your vote as well? Wouldn't you want to know my program first?[]
I wouldnt need to know your progam. I have read the forums forums since I started and they have provided me with all I need to know about your program. |

Sarcasim
The Free Haven Group The Union of Free Worlds
9
|
Posted - 2013.06.19 18:44:00 -
[10] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Sarcasim wrote:If you canGÇÖt be bothered to be in game then you should not be in game cloaked. Why not? Quote:Please explain how clicking a button to remain cloaked would effect a cloaked player present at KB playing the game? Less word salad please?  It would affect a cloaker by giving off even more free intel about his status without the on-lookers having done anything to deserve it. Quote:I wouldnt need to know your progam. I have read the forums forums since I started and they have provided me with all I need to know about your program. Excellent. So could you tell me what it is even without knowing it? I could use some pointers to build my campaign on.
It would seem the Hawk pegged you guys from the get go. I asked a valid question to which you can only reply word salad? You are the Grand master chef of word salad. |
|

Sarcasim
The Free Haven Group The Union of Free Worlds
9
|
Posted - 2013.06.19 19:28:00 -
[11] - Quote
Heart of weakness? Puuuuleaaaseee your playing a video game and sniping the forums 24/7. Your a snapshot and poster child for this heart of weakness |

Sarcasim
The Free Haven Group The Union of Free Worlds
9
|
Posted - 2013.06.19 20:46:00 -
[12] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Sarcasim wrote:Heart of weakness? Puuuuleaaaseee your playing a video game and sniping the forums 24/7. Your a snapshot and poster child for this heart of weakness And yet it's you asking mommy (ccp) to help you while I spend my time figuring things out for myself. THAT what you are doing is weakness sir. Good day!
|

Sarcasim
The Free Haven Group The Union of Free Worlds
9
|
Posted - 2013.06.20 01:42:00 -
[13] - Quote
MailDeadDrop wrote:Kijo Rikki wrote:They can be both, because to the risk averse and those unwilling to adapt, it has an effect, but to those who are more daring or simply know how to deal with it, it has very little if any affect at all. It's all perspective, and the bottom line is an afk cloak physically has zero effect, and has the potential to have a mental effect. You may be on to something, but the statements are still at odds: neither implied a dependency on perspective. Both were absolute statements. I'm hoping one or both of them will revise their statements. I'm also hoping to get past the absolute pronouncements in this thread (not just theirs) and into the reasoning behind them. What I suspect is closer to an absolutely true statement is this combination of facts: 1. an AFK cloaked ship is indistinguishable from an actively piloted cloaked ship 2. an actively piloted cloaked ship piloted by a non-blue pilot is most likely up to no good  3. the first indicator that the pilot of a cloaked ship is active and not AFK is when they uncloak to execute their plan 4. the active pilot of a cloaked ship dictates the time and place of the encounter; the "recipient" of the event has no opportunity to dictate to the pilot of the cloaked ship the time of the encounter (short of "never", i.e. dock up) and limited opportunity to dictate the place. MDD
Good luck with that. They will do do what they do for every thread they dislike. |

Sarcasim
The Free Haven Group The Union of Free Worlds
9
|
Posted - 2013.06.20 01:49:00 -
[14] - Quote
I still donGÇÖt understand why it would be an issue for a cloaker to press a button to remain cloaked every 15-30 min. Most of these people argued in other threads against afk mining yet argue for afk cloaking, Seems a bit hypocritical to me. |

Sarcasim
The Free Haven Group The Union of Free Worlds
9
|
Posted - 2013.06.21 15:18:00 -
[15] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Victoria Sin wrote:TheGunslinger42 wrote:Victoria Sin wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote: In what respect does psyops warfare disrupt your gameplay?
You're calling it "psyops warfare" in an effort to give it legitimacy, when really what you mean is "trolling local". You call it "trolling" in an effort to smear and discredit, when really what you mean is "someone is playing in a way that I don't want them to" hope this helps m8 OK, let me put it another way: If you were designing a brand new game, call it Evelyn 2020 and you introduced a cloaking mechanism, would you or would you not also introduce a counter mechanism? If you say you wouldn't, then I would simply ask you to not tie yourself in knots arguing your point just for the e-peen; I won't think any less of you. "Captain, the Romulans have engaged their cloaking device!" "Damn! Mr. Worf! Post another whine about cloaks on the forums, maybe the devs will nerf it!" What part of "No", do you not understand? Cloaks already have a significant set of drawbacks, drawbacks that render all but unusable apart from some clever ship fitting and cloak specific platforms. So there are plenty of "counters", or drawbacks to cloaking. Let me put it to you this way. If you were to design a game a certain way, would you bend over backwards to accomodate the people who insist on playing the game wrong? Especially when their arguments have been repeatedly refuted, and they've demonstrated they are only interested in continuing to whine against the parts of your game they don't like? Exactly how would pressing a button every 15-30 minuets to remain cloaked put the cloaked at any greater disadvantage... Correct it doesnt
|

Sarcasim
The Free Haven Group The Union of Free Worlds
9
|
Posted - 2013.06.21 15:48:00 -
[16] - Quote
It doesn't give free intel other than to show the person has been at their kb in the last 30 min..seems fair to me. He'll make it 45 min. If you can't be at the on playing the game then you shouldn't be in the game.
FYI your replies to the question where so inane I thought you were trolling |

Sarcasim
The Free Haven Group The Union of Free Worlds
9
|
Posted - 2013.06.21 16:00:00 -
[17] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Sarcasim wrote: If you can't be at the on playing the game then you shouldn't be in the game.
So you agree that autopiloting in high sec should require fuel or automatically log people off after 2 jumps. Stop trying to prove your the idiot that you are. |

Sarcasim
The Free Haven Group The Union of Free Worlds
9
|
Posted - 2013.06.21 16:03:00 -
[18] - Quote
Mag's wrote:Sarcasim wrote:It doesn't give free intel other than to show the person has been at their kb in the last 30 min..seems fair to me. He'll make it 45 min. If you can't be at the on playing the game then you shouldn't be in the game.
FYI your replies to the question where so inane I thought you were trolling Of course it's free intel. If this idea is in place and you keep pressing the button, they know you are at the keyboard. That's free intel. Why should you get even more intel, on top of the already powerful local intel tool? Oh and it's my account, I'll do whatever I wish with it thanks. (within the EULA) I guess for the same reason a person should be able to be cloaked up while sleeping in bed forcing others to adapt to their presence in system.
Same thing afk ice miners said until they changed it  |

Sarcasim
The Free Haven Group The Union of Free Worlds
9
|
Posted - 2013.06.21 16:06:00 -
[19] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Sarcasim wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:Sarcasim wrote: If you can't be at the on playing the game then you shouldn't be in the game.
So you agree that autopiloting in high sec should require fuel or automatically log people off after 2 jumps. Stop trying to prove your the idiot that you are. I accept your surrender. Are you French perchance? Is this where the grammer and spelling trolling starts until you get the thread locked because you dont like the subject and have no valid reason to allow afk cloaking? |

Sarcasim
The Free Haven Group The Union of Free Worlds
9
|
Posted - 2013.06.21 16:11:00 -
[20] - Quote
Mag's wrote:Sarcasim wrote:Mag's wrote:Sarcasim wrote:It doesn't give free intel other than to show the person has been at their kb in the last 30 min..seems fair to me. He'll make it 45 min. If you can't be at the on playing the game then you shouldn't be in the game.
FYI your replies to the question where so inane I thought you were trolling Of course it's free intel. If this idea is in place and you keep pressing the button, they know you are at the keyboard. That's free intel. Why should you get even more intel, on top of the already powerful local intel tool? Oh and it's my account, I'll do whatever I wish with it thanks. (within the EULA) I guess for the same reason a person should be able to be cloaked up while sleeping in bed forcing others to adapt to their presence in system. Prey tell how does someone AFK cloaked in bed asleep, force you to do anything? Isn't it merely prudent to take precautions with an enemy in the system? you are after all in null. What relevance does them being AFK have to taking those steps? People have stated their case and made valid points, your refusal to acknowledge those points doesnGÇÖt make them any less valid. I am done here I donGÇÖt have the time or desire to continue to argue with the internet forum idiots.
Akf cloaking is BS and should be changed just like afk ice mining was changed, (which had a 30 min cycle time as well even)
 |
|

Sarcasim
The Free Haven Group The Union of Free Worlds
9
|
Posted - 2013.06.21 18:03:00 -
[21] - Quote
Kijo Rikki wrote:Hey Sarcasm, what kind of ratting or mining ship do you fly?
I want to help you out. I like helping people, I'll show you how you can do whatever it is you do right under the nose of active hunter ships, let alone a cloaked inactive one. Thank you for the kind offer but I left null a month ago. |
|
|
|