Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Benjen Gelade
State War Academy Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2013.06.20 14:52:00 -
[1] - Quote
Greetings
Firstly, thank you for clicking on my thread. It is very important that everyone reads this and understands the situation.
I fully support the existence of off grid boosting. The reasons for this are many, but I have tried to summarise the main arguments below.
The Mining Argument
In EVE it is not convenient for miners to use mining boosts on grid. The only way for them to mine properly is for them to have a Rorqual provide boosts, at zero risk, from inside POS shields. Everybody in the know agrees on this.
As OGB must remain for mining purposes, it therefore must remain for combat purposes. The reason for this is because CCP cannot code a new 'role bonus' for the Rorqual, allowing it to be the only ship that can provide system wide links, and only for mining links.
The 'Really Difficult to Program' Argument
It is very common for a competitive game to contain a 'broken' or 'overpowered' element from time to time. Typically, upon detecting such an element, game developers disable the element completely until it can be corrected. However this is not appropriate for OGB. The reason for this is because it is actually really difficult for the CCP programmers to fix OGB and will take them a very, very long time. As it will take such a long time, they cannot disable it for that long. It is better to leave OGB in the game indefinitely in a broken state.
The Revenue is King Argument
In order to use OGB you need to subscribe for an account on which to keep the boosting pilot. Therefore OGB provides CCP with revenue. It would not be appropriate for CCP to nerf OGB as this would lead to players that use OGB unsubscribing accounts. CCP's primary objective is to increase the wealth of its shareholders.
The EVE is Harsh Argument
The magical thing about EVE is that it is a very harsh environment. That is why it is appropriate for players use OGB to gain an advantage, at no risk, for a monetary cost, as it is in keeping with EVE's harsh environment.
The Fair Argument
CCP has made OGB available to all players in EVE. Anyone can subscribe an extra account with them, and train up a boosting alt to provide a risk free combat advantage (and actually quite a massive advantage at that). If players do not wish to wait to train the alts, they can purchase plex, and sell this for in game isk, and purchase a boosting alt on the character bazaar.
The 'Elite Solo PVP' Argument
Eve contains a small number of elite solo pvpers. These guys are very good indeed. They use OGB to help them fight against whole gangs of pilots solo. Without OGB they would not be able to do this as well, therefore it is important that OGB remains in the game so that these elite solo pvpers can continue to own gangs single handed (and without having to risk their boosting alt).
If I have missed any of the main arguments, please let me know and I will include them. |

Call Rollard
Caldari Independent Navy Reserve The Fourth District
59
|
Posted - 2013.06.20 14:56:00 -
[2] - Quote
I personally think that Off Grid Boosting should remain for mining etc, Rorq's are too risky to bring into a site.
But then in Combat, you require on-grid boosts for the boosting modules, so Vulture, Loki etc. Cov ops boosting must not be cloaked to give boosts.
For combat. I believe the boosting modules must be used on-grid, however your general boosting levels can be done offgrid.
Comment on this suggestion. |

Dave Stark
3194
|
Posted - 2013.06.20 14:57:00 -
[3] - Quote
Benjen Gelade wrote:The Mining Argument
In EVE it is not convenient for miners to use mining boosts on grid.
no, having a rorqual deployed is the issue, not it being on grid. |

War Kitten
Panda McLegion
2182
|
Posted - 2013.06.20 14:59:00 -
[4] - Quote
You forgot "It's always been like that, why change it now?"
Also, if they remove OGB it will flood Jita with hundreds of alts that will have to double everyone's isk before they can unsub and quit the game.
I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all. |

Mr M
Agony Unleashed
262
|
Posted - 2013.06.20 15:00:00 -
[5] - Quote
No, you're wrong. No risk, no gain. No boosting ship on grid, no boost.
|

BoBoZoBo
Paragon Fury Tactical Narcotics Team
248
|
Posted - 2013.06.20 15:01:00 -
[6] - Quote
Call Rollard wrote:I personally think that Off Grid Boosting should remain for mining etc, Rorq's are too risky to bring into a site.
Herein lies the problem of many EVE players. Hope CCP is taking note. Primary Test Subject GÇó SmackTalker Elite |

Ariel Dawn
F9X
983
|
Posted - 2013.06.20 15:04:00 -
[7] - Quote
Off-grid boosting should remain so for mining as it's not really something people take advantage of in PvP.
Having command modules that are active make your ship SIGNIFICANTLY easier to scan down could be a decent middle-ground in this issue. Being able to put together unscannable T3s is the silly part, considering how a max-skilled boost character gives everyone in their fleet the equivalent of ~2 top-end officer mods. Some of the things being boosted need to be toned down or improved as well. |

Adunh Slavy
1000
|
Posted - 2013.06.20 15:05:00 -
[8] - Quote
Benjen Gelade wrote: The Fair Argument Anyone can subscribe an extra account with them ...
The 'Elite Solo PVP' Argument Eve contains a small number of elite solo pvpers. These guys are very good indeed. They use OGB to help them fight against whole gangs of pilots solo.
So ... pay to win, is that it?
And an elite 'solo' PVPer doesn't have an alt, a solo player is indeed one character, not some shlub with a command ship in a safe spot and a cloaked falcon wandering around in case the 'elite solo' gets in trouble. |

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
2223
|
Posted - 2013.06.20 15:10:00 -
[9] - Quote
I've said this before, many times, and I'll say it again: off-grid boosting is an equalizing factor for battles with numerical disparities.
If two forces of different size are fighting each other, and the boosting can be done off-grid, then the forces are proportionally as efficient as if there was no boosting at all, assuming no significant differences in boosting skills.
If two forces of different size are fighting each other, and the boosting can only be done on-grid, then the larger force gets a significant advantage over the smaller force, because:
1. the larger force is more able to defend its boosting ships due to being able to proportionally field more logistics 2. the larger force is more able to attack the smaller force's boosting ships because its superior DPS overpowers them quicker 3. the larger force, by its very nature, is more able to field backup boosting ships to immediately replace the ones lost due to enemy action
These three factors combined would make smaller forces objectively worse off when fighting larger ones, and that is on top of having a numerical disadvantage, than they are today.
So, if you advocate on-grid boosting, you're basically saying "I like to blob my enemies, and it would be nice if CCP made it so that I could blob my enemies more efficiently. Please, CCP, change this mechanic so that I am able to use my organization's superior numbers to an even greater advantage over smaller parties. Creating such a disincentive to small-scale pvp would really help me further my own goals at the expense of the game as a whole." I wrote some true EVE stories! And no, they're not of the generic "my 0.0 alliance had lots of 0.0 fleets and took a lot of 0.0 space" sort. Check them out here:
https://truestories.eveonline.com/users/2074-destiny-corrupted |

Benjen Gelade
State War Academy Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2013.06.20 15:22:00 -
[10] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:I've said this before, many times, and I'll say it again: off-grid boosting is an equalizing factor for battles with numerical disparities.
If two forces of different size are fighting each other, and the boosting can be done off-grid, then the forces are proportionally as efficient as if there was no boosting at all, assuming no significant differences in boosting skills.
If two forces of different size are fighting each other, and the boosting can only be done on-grid, then the larger force gets a significant advantage over the smaller force, because:
1. the larger force is more able to defend its boosting ships due to being able to proportionally field more logistics 2. the larger force is more able to attack the smaller force's boosting ships because its superior DPS overpowers them quicker 3. the larger force, by its very nature, is more able to field backup boosting ships to immediately replace the ones lost due to enemy action
These three factors combined would make smaller forces objectively worse off when fighting larger ones, and that is on top of having a numerical disadvantage, than they are today.
So, if you advocate on-grid boosting, you're basically saying "I like to blob my enemies, and it would be nice if CCP made it so that I could blob my enemies more efficiently. Please, CCP, change this mechanic so that I am able to use my organization's superior numbers to an even greater advantage over smaller parties. Creating such a disincentive to small-scale pvp would really help me further my own goals at the expense of the game as a whole."
The funny thing is, whilst you were trying to frame the '1,2,3' scenario as totally ********, I actually thought it made perfect sense.... |
|

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
2223
|
Posted - 2013.06.20 15:25:00 -
[11] - Quote
Benjen Gelade wrote:The funny thing is, whilst you were trying to frame the '1,2,3' scenario as totally unfair and unjust, with only the mentally sick thinking it is a realistic way for battles to work, I actually thought it made perfect sense....
I guess I better get my head examined It's like asking CCP to make doomsday damage scale with the amount of people in your fleet. It's that bad of an idea.
But of course everyone has his own agenda so I doubt I'll be changing the minds of people who would actively benefit from this stupid proposed change. I wrote some true EVE stories! And no, they're not of the generic "my 0.0 alliance had lots of 0.0 fleets and took a lot of 0.0 space" sort. Check them out here:
https://truestories.eveonline.com/users/2074-destiny-corrupted |

Van Hiaasen
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
2
|
Posted - 2013.06.20 15:25:00 -
[12] - Quote
Benjen Gelade wrote:The reason for this is because CCP cannot code a new 'role bonus' for the Rorqua
Benjen Gelade wrote:The reason for this is because it is actually really difficult for the CCP programmers to fix OGB and will take them a very, very long time. As it will take such a long time, they cannot disable it for that long.
Do you have any links of CCP saying the above you mentioned? I'd like to read about it.
I fully support what you are saying. I believe OGB is completely fine within current mechanics. I use a carrier in a POS to boost me and my gang as we run sites in the system. I'm sure as hell not bringing my carrier into the site on grid with the site-running gang!
However I do believe that using unprobable, cloaky, nullified T3's to OGB is overpowered. OGB should be limited to capital ships only, T3's and command ships should have to be on grid to perform the function.
I have a Loki fitted for PVP that is cloaked and nullified so its damn near uncatcheable at gates even with bubbles. It is also unprobable so it can sit off grid uncloaked at a safe and provide boosts with 100% immunity. It also has the probing subsystem and sisters probe launcher so it can probe down enemies in system and warp my squad straight to them. I use this Loki fairly often and everytime I do I feel much overpowered with all the things I can do at pretty much zero risk. |

Mistress Lilu
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
186
|
Posted - 2013.06.20 15:27:00 -
[13] - Quote
Getting rid of OGB is the dumbest thing CCP can do. In the last year or so, CCP along with the big alliances in game have, behind closed doors, along with CSM, have decided that solo/small gang pvp is no longer relevant. Why make a group of people happy, when the real money is coming from the mindless sheeps in the large alliances. Last several years, ccp has done all it can to destroy solo/small gang pvp with killing mods, creating b.ullshit mods that are mediocre, running around the issue of OP ECM. Now, get rid of OGB,come on dudes. The only people who will use boosts are gonna be the large alliances. They are gonna have double boosts with 3 logi ships dedicated to each booster. What is 3 logi when your corp can field 300+ pilots. THANK YOU CCP FOR KILLING SOLO/SMALL GANG. |

Destination SkillQueue
Are We There Yet
5244
|
Posted - 2013.06.20 15:41:00 -
[14] - Quote
The mere fact you people defend the existance of off grid boosting by using solo PvP as justification is pretty hilarious. First, there is nothing solo about it, if you're using multiple characters at the same time. Second, if using boosters has truly come to the point, that solo players feel they can't fight without using one, it's just one more reason to let OGB die in a fire. |

Lucy Ferrr
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
232
|
Posted - 2013.06.20 15:45:00 -
[15] - Quote
Mistress Lilu wrote:Getting rid of OGB is the dumbest thing CCP can do. In the last year or so, CCP along with the big alliances in game have, behind closed doors, along with CSM, have decided that solo/small gang pvp is no longer relevant. Why make a group of people happy, when the real money is coming from the mindless sheeps in the large alliances. Last several years, ccp has done all it can to destroy solo/small gang pvp with killing mods, creating b.ullshit mods that are mediocre, running around the issue of OP ECM. Now, get rid of OGB,come on dudes. The only people who will use boosts are gonna be the large alliances. They are gonna have double boosts with 3 logi ships dedicated to each booster. What is 3 logi when your corp can field 300+ pilots. THANK YOU CCP FOR KILLING SOLO/SMALL GANG.
You must be on drugs, very very good drugs. It's not nice of you to not share, cause they must be very good if you think OGB helps the small guy. OGB is the single biggest kick in the balls to small gang and solo PvP. One person multiboxing 3 characters and an OGB is not 'elite solo PvP'. |

ElQuirko
Jester Syndicate S0UTHERN C0MF0RT
1472
|
Posted - 2013.06.20 15:47:00 -
[16] - Quote
BoBoZoBo wrote:Call Rollard wrote:I personally think that Off Grid Boosting should remain for mining etc, Rorq's are too risky to bring into a site. Herein lies the problem of many EVE players. Hope CCP is taking note.
Well ****, I forgot risk vs reward wasn't a thing in this game anymore. Save the Domi model! Spacewhales should be preserved. |

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
2223
|
Posted - 2013.06.20 15:47:00 -
[17] - Quote
Destination SkillQueue wrote:if using boosters has truly come to the point, that solo players feel they can't fight without using one, it's just one more reason to let OGB die in a fire. The conclusion does not follow from the premise.
Like wishing that a nation would collapse on itself because its taxes are too high. Always throw out the baby with the bathwater, right?
But don't get me wrong, I'd rather boosting was removed entirely than be made off-grid only. At least that way numerical superiority doesn't become more of a requirement than it is today. I wrote some true EVE stories! And no, they're not of the generic "my 0.0 alliance had lots of 0.0 fleets and took a lot of 0.0 space" sort. Check them out here:
https://truestories.eveonline.com/users/2074-destiny-corrupted |

Adunh Slavy
1002
|
Posted - 2013.06.20 15:50:00 -
[18] - Quote
Mistress Lilu wrote: In the last year or so, CCP along with the big alliances in game have, behind closed doors, along with CSM, have decided that solo/small gang pvp is no longer relevant.
It is not my intention to derail this thread from the main topic but think this should be addressed.
Solo and small gang PVP is more impacted by things other than large groups of sheep. Instead it is impacted by how easy it is to move those sheep and how it is all too common that tactical situations give advantage to herds.
- Power projection is too cheap and too easy.
- Not that I personally enjoyed having to slow boat 15km on every jump, WTZ has made the map much smaller from the perspective of time.
- Travel mechanics in are too heavily skewed towards perfect information rather than imperfect information.
|

Hessian Arcturus
S.W.O.R.D. Navy
159
|
Posted - 2013.06.20 15:57:00 -
[19] - Quote
Mr M wrote:No, you're wrong. No risk, no gain. No boosting ship on grid, no boost.
Quoted this purely because this guy has his head screwed on...Agreed! It's human nature to want to explore. To find your line and go beyond it. The only limit, is the one you set yourself. |

Samillian
Angry Mustellid
240
|
Posted - 2013.06.20 15:59:00 -
[20] - Quote
Boosting on grid or not at all. NBSI shall be the whole of the Law |
|

Jake Warbird
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
2956
|
Posted - 2013.06.20 16:01:00 -
[21] - Quote
I support OP. You noobs sure as hell don't know how to solo pvp. You all suck. |

Ziphis
Garoun Investment Bank Gallente Federation
17
|
Posted - 2013.06.20 16:10:00 -
[22] - Quote
Destination SkillQueue wrote:The mere fact you people defend the existance of off grid boosting by using solo PvP as justification is pretty hilarious. First, there is nothing solo about it, if you're using multiple characters at the same time. Second, if using boosters has truly come to the point, that solo players feel they can't fight without using one, it's just one more reason to let OGB die in a fire.
Quoting this person as I completely agree solo pvpers go around ALONE the fact is in name solo the while solo pvp those who go round with booster alts are in a fleet hence not solo, with CCP hopefully putting these alts on the grid it gives real solo pvpers a chance a small chance yes but a chance none the less of getting the boosts out of the equation |

Rath Kelbore
The Six-Pack Syndicate Hashashin Cartel
385
|
Posted - 2013.06.20 16:11:00 -
[23] - Quote
Other than the programming perspective, I disagree with all of your points.
There is no reason for a ship that isn't on grid to be able to give tangible benefits to ships "on grid".
I used the word tangible in hopes that it will keep the nerf afk cloaking group at bay.
Plus, with some re-balancing, we should see an increase in command ship use. Which I think would be a good thing. I plan on living forever.......so far, so good. |

Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
2785
|
Posted - 2013.06.20 16:19:00 -
[24] - Quote
If two fleets run into each other, you can be sure that both have off grid boosts.
So, in that respect having OGB or not is a moot point since everyone is using it.
To me the issue is being able to boost from inside a POS shield. That gives a distinct advantage to the defenders that should already have the advantage anyway (if they're not complete morons).
I would advocate that off grid is fine since the ships are still vulnerable, but boosting from behind a shield is disabled. That's balance, not a nerf.
Mr Epeen  There are 86,400 seconds in a day. You just saved one of them by typing 'u' instead of 'you'.-á Congratulations, dumbass! |

Nyancat Audeles
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
326
|
Posted - 2013.06.20 16:21:00 -
[25] - Quote
They should remove boosts altogether.. |

Victoria Sin
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
293
|
Posted - 2013.06.20 16:37:00 -
[26] - Quote
From the point of view of a Rorqual/Orca pilot, the removal of off-grid boosting would be fatal to their use in mining ops in null. They aren't used for anything else. People who use them for hauling or as an on-grid boost lose them eventually. Might as well delete them from the game. Paradoxically, the only place the Orca would be used thereafter would be in high sec mining. |

Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
2785
|
Posted - 2013.06.20 16:46:00 -
[27] - Quote
Victoria Sin wrote:From the point of view of a Rorqual/Orca pilot, the removal of off-grid boosting would be fatal to their use in mining ops in null. They aren't used for anything else. People who use them for hauling or as an on-grid boost lose them eventually. Might as well delete them from the game. Paradoxically, the only place the Orca would be used thereafter would be in high sec mining.
Yeah people lose ships in EVE. 'Tis true.
So you think that because someone can't be arsed to put in the time to train a Rorq pilot properly, that they should be essentially invulnerable?
POS bashing to kill a booster? That just doesn't sit right with me.
Mr Epeen 
There are 86,400 seconds in a day. You just saved one of them by typing 'u' instead of 'you'.-á Congratulations, dumbass! |

Victoria Sin
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
293
|
Posted - 2013.06.20 16:57:00 -
[28] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote: So you think that because someone can't be arsed to put in the time to train a Rorq pilot properly, that they should be essentially invulnerable?
POS bashing to kill a booster? That just doesn't sit right with me.
I really have no idea what they hell you're going on about. Time to train a Rorqual doesn't make any difference to it being a massive brick that's going to get hot-dropped and popped, at 2.5b a go.
|

Rob Crowley
State War Academy
77
|
Posted - 2013.06.20 16:57:00 -
[29] - Quote
ITT: Lots of people who haven't read the OP. And by "read" I really mean "understood", I'm just being polite. |

Domanique Altares
Rifterlings Point Blank Alliance
427
|
Posted - 2013.06.20 17:03:00 -
[30] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:I've said this before, many times, and I'll say it again: off-grid boosting is an equalizing factor for battles with numerical disparities.
If two forces of different size are fighting each other, and the boosting can be done off-grid, then the forces are proportionally as efficient as if there was no boosting at all, assuming no significant differences in boosting skills.
If two forces of different size are fighting each other, and the boosting can only be done on-grid, then the larger force gets a significant advantage over the smaller force, because:
1. the larger force is more able to defend its boosting ships due to being able to proportionally field more logistics 2. the larger force is more able to attack the smaller force's boosting ships because its superior DPS overpowers them quicker 3. the larger force, by its very nature, is more able to field backup boosting ships to immediately replace the ones lost due to enemy action
These three factors combined would make smaller forces objectively worse off when fighting larger ones, and that is on top of having a numerical disadvantage, than they are today.
So, if you advocate on-grid boosting, you're basically saying "I like to blob my enemies, and it would be nice if CCP made it so that I could blob my enemies more efficiently. Please, CCP, change this mechanic so that I am able to use my organization's superior numbers to an even greater advantage over smaller parties. Creating such a disincentive to small-scale pvp would really help me further my own goals at the expense of the game as a whole."
Rifterlings Corporation is now recruiting pilots for faction warfare solo & small gang frigate PvP. Visit our website at www.rifterlings.com or join our in game channel weflyrifters to speak to a recruiter. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |