|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

baltec1
Bat Country
7083
|
Posted - 2013.07.01 16:18:00 -
[1] - Quote
Gallowmere Rorschach wrote:Jesus Christ....how often does this come up? That's twice in one day. I need call MiniLuv and have them fill my swimming pool with some of these tears.
They come in waves. |

baltec1
Bat Country
7083
|
Posted - 2013.07.01 16:23:00 -
[2] - Quote
Elder TheRock wrote:its not about the loss of money....
and i don-Št want a discussion about these...
Its only to give CCP a feedback from faithful players
If you buy a ship to transport things from A to B, but you can-Št do this while you where killed, also without cargo(see goon kills), then something goes wrong, hopefully you will understand this
You had a billion isk worth of topes along with other things. It wasn't empty. |

baltec1
Bat Country
7089
|
Posted - 2013.07.01 16:59:00 -
[3] - Quote
It was a case of "ooh whats in here? what are you trying to hide?" and we whack the pi+Šata. |

baltec1
Bat Country
7104
|
Posted - 2013.07.01 17:54:00 -
[4] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:What's a faithful player anyway?
Amarr. |

baltec1
Bat Country
7128
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 10:17:00 -
[5] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:Johan Toralen wrote:Everytime i see a thread of "old, faithful" player rage quitting over some noob mistake my gut feeling tells me: ebay char. Its a noob mistake to undock a jump freighter? Are they just for spinning in station. Players killing ships in high for no other reason but other than padding their terribly fragile egos is not good for EvE. Killing people is fine, even if its just to **** them off but when it gets to the point they can kill any ship without loss or with negligible loss it becomes a problem of balance that needs addressing. How is autoing an undefended Jump Frieghter in High Sec without a jump--out and carrying a high value cargo not a noob mistake? They likely would have killed it just for the lulz. A billion in isotopes is not a valuable cargo. Do the math how much profit did they make?
Confiming we have spent over 500 billion on ganking freights just for the "lulz" and not the 4 trillion in cargo over the last year. |

baltec1
Bat Country
7130
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 10:49:00 -
[6] - Quote
Debora Tsung wrote:Gallowmere Rorschach wrote:Jesus Christ....how often does this come up? That's twice in one day. I need call MiniLuv and have them fill my swimming pool with some of these tears. lol, true. That thread has something almost philosophical. There's one side that always claims that Jump freightors or cloaky haulers can never be caught (or that dastardly cloaky Tengu and it's interdiction nullifier) and should be removed or nerved so much they could as well be removed and then there's the other side that claims all freighters are to easy to gank and therefore PVP should be removed entirely. It's hilarious, really. 
Well to be fair a blockade runner is damn near impossible to catch in high sec if you do it right. |

baltec1
Bat Country
7130
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 11:09:00 -
[7] - Quote
Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote:baltec1 wrote:Debora Tsung wrote:Gallowmere Rorschach wrote:Jesus Christ....how often does this come up? That's twice in one day. I need call MiniLuv and have them fill my swimming pool with some of these tears. lol, true. That thread has something almost philosophical. There's one side that always claims that Jump freightors or cloaky haulers can never be caught (or that dastardly cloaky Tengu and it's interdiction nullifier) and should be removed or nerved so much they could as well be removed and then there's the other side that claims all freighters are to easy to gank and therefore PVP should be removed entirely. It's hilarious, really.  Well to be fair a blockade runner is damn near impossible to catch in high sec if you do it right. High sec doesn't matter anyway therefore no problem or issue to solve. Oh theres no issue, although I still don't know why CCP made them unscannable. We have plenty of bads who transport billions in untanked iterons. |

baltec1
Bat Country
7131
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 11:27:00 -
[8] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote: Should be easy for no one.
Its much harder to set up a freighter gank than to make a freighter safe and requires at least 17 more people for the gank. |

baltec1
Bat Country
7131
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 12:50:00 -
[9] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:baltec1 wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote: Should be easy for no one.
Its much harder to set up a freighter gank than to make a freighter safe and requires at least 17 more people for the gank. Lol. Its not hard at all. As you pointed out you make very high profits while sitting in high sec totally safe from harm. You're pretty much identical to the risk averse hi-sec miner except your profit is much higher. The miner has to worry about ganks and performs some effort. You bump a freighter and click a button once or twice. If high sec pvers were as risk free and profitable as you, you guys would be screaming like little girls for CCP to nerf them. It benefits you, so you defend it. Thats pretty much the facts.
Fun fact. You can gank our t2 brutix and make a profit. Its also possible to gank our t2 catalysts for profit too. We also operate while under several wardecs, have countless killrights on us and the freighters tbat scoop the loot can be shot at by everyone with no concord help. So no, we operate at a much greater risk. |

baltec1
Bat Country
7131
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 13:12:00 -
[10] - Quote
Benny Ohu wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:Benny Ohu wrote:darn you make it sound so easy
perhaps you should try it yourself if it's so simple and profitable If I wanted PvE against unarmed ships. . . Actually I wouldn't want that. well. it's pvp, actually. it's so simple and profitable you don't want to do it? please explain It would seem the punishment and risk is too high. |
|

baltec1
Bat Country
7132
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 13:25:00 -
[11] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:Benny Ohu wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:Benny Ohu wrote:darn you make it sound so easy
perhaps you should try it yourself if it's so simple and profitable If I wanted PvE against unarmed ships. . . Actually I wouldn't want that. well. it's pvp, actually. it's so simple and profitable you don't want to do it? please explain Its PvP. Aggressor can not be aggressed. Pilot cannot do anything to avoid aggressor. Pilot is just sitting there non-interactable. May as well not be in the ship.
You described a fight involving a falcon. And anything with ECM drones, and instacanes vs frigate, and the driveby titan, and sniping nado fleets, and smartbomb blops gangs and... |

baltec1
Bat Country
7135
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 13:44:00 -
[12] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote: Player A got ganked because the mechanics are imbalanced.
Player A got ganked because there was a profit to be had. We dont gank these thing just for giggles. |

baltec1
Bat Country
7137
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 13:55:00 -
[13] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:baltec1 wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote: Player A got ganked because the mechanics are imbalanced.
Player A got ganked because there was a profit to be had. We dont gank these thing just for giggles. Really? So your 31 man gank on the freighter also featuring in this forum atm in which 2 bil / 31 dropped you call profitable? You'd make more running level 4s and itd be more exciting for you since you'd be risking something at least. I see you ignored the multple times I said we are at war. |

baltec1
Bat Country
7144
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 15:13:00 -
[14] - Quote
Arec Bardwin wrote:baltec1 wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote: Player A got ganked because the mechanics are imbalanced.
Player A got ganked because there was a profit to be had. We dont gank these thing just for giggles. Seriously, at least be honest and say you do it mostly for giggles. Any isk profit is just a nice bonus.
We started out on miners for the tears but after making so much isk we decided to make an industry of it. Freighters have always been about the isk and tears second. the best tears come from the scams anyway. |

baltec1
Bat Country
7152
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 17:20:00 -
[15] - Quote
Logical Chaos wrote:
EVERYONE can shoot that freighter? Didn't it use to be only the corp of the first (dead) freighter pilot which was basically useless? Kind of evens the risk-free-PvP thingie!
Swipe from a can and everyone can shoot you for 15 min. |

baltec1
Bat Country
7152
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 17:23:00 -
[16] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:Dear Baltec1, voice of bat country, I have a request for your wisdom.
Would my charon be able to haul a full load of trit in system 0.9, 0.8, 0.9 or will your britix feast upon my lossmail?
:D
We once feasted upon a pile of trit, it was hidden in plastic wrap and we didn't like the taste. |

baltec1
Bat Country
7155
|
Posted - 2013.07.02 17:34:00 -
[17] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote: Except it can be aligned and ready to instawarp the moment it scoops. By the time it turns red its in warp.
Its funny to think that back when this was announced many anti-gank campaigners got all excited and bounced around celebrating the end of hauler ganking and something about ganker tears.
We adapted before crimewatch even hit. |

baltec1
Bat Country
7176
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 09:01:00 -
[18] - Quote
Callyuk wrote:Zane Lowe wrote:Phish wrote:Honestly it is a very stupid mechanic. To let a bunch of ships that total less then 30M kill a freighter. There needs to be a way to fight back on the freighters side, so if your AFK your dead but if your active and there you can so something with at least a chance of saving your ship. (a chance, doesn't have to be 100%, but at least 50% would be nice) Man, you really know nothing if you think you can kill a freighter with 30m worth of ships. lets be generous here and say 70m
Wont even get you two brutix. |

baltec1
Bat Country
7176
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 09:40:00 -
[19] - Quote
Elecktra Blue wrote:
Wait..We pay for ships?
Well we spend the isk other people gift us. |

baltec1
Bat Country
7182
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 14:27:00 -
[20] - Quote
Debora Tsung wrote:Tippia wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:They die in high a lot. The gates leading to Jita says otherwise, as do every pipeline between the main hubs. If they died a lot, why on earth is space full of them? Do you have any kind of statistic to show this mass slaughter? I bet it's all about safety in numbers, if 1000 freighters travel to jita every day, and 2 of them get ganked on the way (every day) then Your average risk to loos a freighter is at 0,002% (every day). :) Or, if You carry 2bil worth of stuff in Your hold You can calculate an average risk of 400m isk. Cost for the freighter not included ofc.  Now I wish I had numbers not pulled out of my arse so we could do some risk calculation. 
We did (because we love numbers and facts) and the risk of losing a freighter with a cargo that is not profitable to gank is around the same as being involved in a fatal car crash.
Its most likely much lower as we calculated using the average number of freighters to pass through jita in a day vs EVE wide freighter/JF kills over a month. If you work out freighters killed vs freighter trips EVE wide chances are you will be struck by lightning first unless you do something daft. |
|

baltec1
Bat Country
7194
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 08:37:00 -
[21] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:BoSau Hotim wrote:@Infinity
I've been reading as much as I can, but I want to know this because I haven't seen you post about it:
What exactly do you want CCP to do about this? Nothing. Im just making observations about ganking being too easy, profitable and risk free. I would like to see it revert back to old style. Where a stupidly rich cargo gets ganked because people put in some effort and won the lotto for that. Currently jump freighters and freighters are being ganked by 30 dessies for less profit per hour than they could make in L4s solo. Even though they gank these lootless ships for giggles they still admit to making trillions for expenditures of half a billion. No one should be making trillions in high sec risk free like this.
You do realise that it was cheaper to do it in the past right?
Also we have made trillions after investing at least 500 billion in lost ships. The profits are good but not THAT good and we don't do this just for ***** and giggles. |

baltec1
Bat Country
7197
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 12:51:00 -
[22] - Quote
Jowen Datloran wrote:Regardless of other discussions, I actually think the cost (ISK wise) between a freighter (without cargo) and the ships/equipment you have to buy to suicide gank one is a tad disproportional in favor of the ganker. For industrial and transport ships it feels much better.
Not that I have any hope of any changes in that regard. HTFU and all that jazz.
Given enough people you can gank anything for free. |

baltec1
Bat Country
7201
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 20:05:00 -
[23] - Quote
Ace Uoweme wrote:Elizabeth Aideron wrote:of course you get a benefit, the benefit of being able to sit in a freighter and move piles of **** around the galaxy. it doesnt grant you invulnerability But it doesn't justify the skill time when it's too easy for someone with less skills to destroy that freighter. Now if the guy who downs the freighter is equally skilled, no argument. As both chose different "careers" and one was industry and the other combat. But not for some 30 day wonder doing it. 
The only single pilot that can kill a freighter before concord shows up is a titan pilot.
|

baltec1
Bat Country
7201
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 20:06:00 -
[24] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:baltec1 wrote:Jowen Datloran wrote:Regardless of other discussions, I actually think the cost (ISK wise) between a freighter (without cargo) and the ships/equipment you have to buy to suicide gank one is a tad disproportional in favor of the ganker. For industrial and transport ships it feels much better.
Not that I have any hope of any changes in that regard. HTFU and all that jazz. Given enough people you can gank anything for free. You are not planning a gank fleet made out of free noob ship right?
It would take hundreds |

baltec1
Bat Country
7205
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 05:29:00 -
[25] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote: The issue is its too easy, too risk free and too profitable. It takes no cunning.Bumping ships is basic.Fitting a dessie is basic.
It is only as easy, profitable and risky as the target makes it. |

baltec1
Bat Country
7209
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 13:02:00 -
[26] - Quote
Riddle me this.
If freighters are so easy to kill and make heaps of isk doing it why is there only a few dosen kills a month? Seems a rather low number given the hundreds of thousands of trips made every month.
Seem like a very rare thing indeed. |

baltec1
Bat Country
7209
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 13:24:00 -
[27] - Quote
Ace Uoweme wrote:baltec1 wrote:Riddle me this.
If freighters are so easy to kill and make heaps of isk doing it why is there only a few dosen kills a month? Seems a rather low number given the hundreds of thousands of trips made every month.
Seem like a very rare thing indeed. Bat Country only kills freighters with like 6 packaged Tengus in it (seen an killmail by your IsBox corps), that's why. You gatecamp looking for big kills to brag about.
So this is not an issue and is a rare, easily avoided thing. |
|
|
|