| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Sex Slave Girl
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
94
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 07:44:00 -
[1] - Quote
Let's talk about the good and bad stuff that comes with it.
For starters, I think the active eve population will go up, by a lot. Possible reaching 200.000 players on a normal day.
I also think, we will have 4~7 cloaky neutrals in every null sec system, that afk all day.
Jita will stil be limited to roughly 2000 players, but instead. The entire constellation will be nearly full. Reaching Jita would be impossible.
Suicide freighter ganks are more easily attained. As 1 guy could get 150 free to play accounts and use rifters to suicide on 1 Freighter.
The bittervets and other old carebear people will quit the game. But instead for every one of them, eve online gets 30 free to play players (who would probably never pay or barely go for microtransactions).
Time Dilation is a natural thing, as it will affect everyone, for the whole time. Fleet op Fights will probably resulting in a lot of server crashes.
But there are some good things too that come with it. We will have more people to play with! I, believe that eve online currently is a stable game, and due to this, will attract a lot of new players if it were to become free to play.
However the game will be changed so much, it won't be eve as we know it. |

Liafcipe9000
Smeghead Empire
7257
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 07:50:00 -
[2] - Quote
first 
posting in a stealth "EVE is dying" thread You may gain the knowledge, but you will lose your belief, with all its mystery and comfort. If there was proof, absolute and certain, there is an afterlife, why not quit this life, and be done with it? Ponder about these things all your life, and you're a philosopher. Compress these ponderings into a couple of pages, and you'll go mad. |

Alice Saki
Full Spectrum Hairdresser Pirates
69324
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 07:51:00 -
[3] - Quote
It's all Bad.
|

Kult Altol
Confederation Navy Research Epsilon Fleet
545
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 07:51:00 -
[4] - Quote
See my sig, that's eve free to play. Can't wait untill when Eve online is Freemium. WiS only 10$, SP booster for one month 15$, DPS Boost 2$, EHP Boost 2$ |

Job Valador
Super Moose Defence Force
72
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 08:00:00 -
[5] - Quote
slaves should be seen not heard girl. See the teribad things you say [IMG]http://imageshack.us/a/img836/7059/c00286794da9496e2b391.jpg[/IMG]
Rule 34 ^ |

iownuall123
Vanusk Industries
32
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 08:07:00 -
[6] - Quote
F2P would kill eve, simple. It would be ruined by the microtransactions that would replace PLEX purchases and subscriptions. It would tank harder than SWTOR |

Lipbite
Express Hauler
701
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 08:25:00 -
[7] - Quote
Let's scare those rich people with communism to manipulate them easier!
F2P isn't that bad as microtransactions in subscriptions-based game. Quote from Sean's interview ~6 months ago:
I see the world as a microtransaction
P.S. I'd pay $49 for optional Incarna expansion |

Cannibal Kane
Temple of Kane
1978
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 08:27:00 -
[8] - Quote
Lets keep flogging that Horse... "I saw him fight by the monument in Jita. -áHe flowed in his Machariel like a Shinto spirit, 800MM shells sprouting in his passing. -áHis hair flowed in the corona of his target's warp core breach. -áIt was truly majestic. -áAnd while everyone stared in awe I stole the loot and ran off.-áBecause I am like that." --áNEONOVUS |

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
357
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 08:33:00 -
[9] - Quote
Sex Slave Girl wrote:The bittervets and other old carebear people will quit the game. But instead for every one of them, eve online gets 30 free to play players (who would probably never pay or barely go for microtransactions).
WoW says hello.
PvE game (and the devs will flat tell you that's their focus) with consensual PvP. #1 in the industry.
What you will get are all the freeloaders in gaming, who use up the resources, pollute the environment and the game sinks due to it all.
Because gaming is NOT free. Someone is paying for it.
No money by all, no goods for all. "In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ~George Orwell
|

Victoria Sin
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
357
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 08:37:00 -
[10] - Quote
I preferred Eve when peak was 4k players. It really was like the Wild West back then.
I failed very hard at playing it though. It's a lot easier now. 
|

Rick Sarth
The Scope Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 08:42:00 -
[11] - Quote
iownuall123 wrote:F2P would kill eve, simple. It would be ruined by the microtransactions that would replace PLEX purchases and subscriptions. It would tank harder than SWTOR
(Shudder) I remember the childlike excitement of receiving my SWTOR collectors ed box, playing in the beta and looking forward to that.
Then actually playing it live was such a disappointment....sad panda!
They basically turned it into a totally partition dungeon version of wow.
EVE is best with the level of players and seeing it in 2004 with about 10k on server at once to yesterday with some 46k, I don't think the game is in danger of any stagnation, its such a slow burner.
I find the microtransaction model is just a bit gimmicky tbh. |

Diesel47
Bad Men Ltd.
665
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 08:57:00 -
[12] - Quote
Wish 'free to play" was never invented.
|
|

Chribba
Otherworld Enterprises Otherworld Empire
8794
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 09:19:00 -
[13] - Quote
I rather see a future with less trolls.
/c
|
|

Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
923
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 09:26:00 -
[14] - Quote
Lander explanation about tEve existing concept of free to play and the repercussions if this concept would be changed for the current models, is quite clear.
No need to speculate any further. *removed inappropriate ASCII art signature* - CCP Eterne |

Victoria Sin
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
357
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 09:50:00 -
[15] - Quote
Chribba wrote:I rather see a future with less trolls.
/c
Fewer. |
|

Chribba
Otherworld Enterprises Otherworld Empire
8795
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 09:59:00 -
[16] - Quote
Victoria Sin wrote:Chribba wrote:I rather see a future with less trolls.
/c Fewer. Thank you kindly for correcting my English.
/c
|
|

Ammzi
Boob Heads Test Alliance Please Ignore
1382
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 10:07:00 -
[17] - Quote
OP, please biomass. quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

Liafcipe9000
Smeghead Empire
7286
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 10:41:00 -
[18] - Quote
Ammzi wrote:OP, please biomass. ... in a... fire?  You may gain the knowledge, but you will lose your belief, with all its mystery and comfort. If there was proof, absolute and certain, there is an afterlife, why not quit this life, and be done with it? Ponder about these things all your life, and you're a philosopher. Compress these ponderings into a couple of pages, and you'll go mad. |

Miilla
Hulkageddon Orphanage
595
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 10:42:00 -
[19] - Quote
I don't like F2P but I do like SomebodyElsePaysForMyPlay which is truely what Eve is. |

Jake Warbird
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
3099
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 10:51:00 -
[20] - Quote
Good thing then Eve will never be f2p. |

I Sellsstuffz
State War Academy Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 12:19:00 -
[21] - Quote
If eve goes F2P ill likely quit. Seriously the way it is now keeps most of the rabble out, going F2P would just increase the level of stupidity to unbearable levels,
Thats just my $0.02 |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Turing Tested
554
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 12:20:00 -
[22] - Quote
Sex Slave Girl wrote:
Time Titilation is a natural thing, as it will affect everyone, for the whole time
I can't wait till
EvE becomes "Forced2Play" " Ramona McCandless, you're my hero." - Domanique Altares, Rifterlings, Point Blank Alliance
Tell The Others |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
10501
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 12:28:00 -
[23] - Quote
Sex Slave Girl wrote:Let's talk about the good and bad stuff that comes with it.
For starters, I think the active eve population will go up, by a lot. Possible reaching 200.000 players on a normal day.
I also think, we will have 4~7 cloaky neutrals in every null sec system, that afk all day.
Jita will stil be limited to roughly 2000 players, but instead. The entire constellation will be nearly full. Reaching Jita would be impossible.
Suicide freighter ganks are more easily attained. As 1 guy could get 150 free to play accounts and use rifters to suicide on 1 Freighter.
The bittervets and other old carebear people will quit the game. But instead for every one of them, eve online gets 30 free to play players (who would probably never pay or barely go for microtransactions).
Time Dilation is a natural thing, as it will affect everyone, for the whole time. Fleet op Fights will probably resulting in a lot of server crashes.
But there are some good things too that come with it. We will have more people to play with! I, believe that eve online currently is a stable game, and due to this, will attract a lot of new players if it were to become free to play.
However the game will be changed so much, it won't be eve as we know it.
EVE simply isn't structured to work with the classic F2P/Cash shop model. Why on earth should CCP do such a thing when they're already seeing good year-on-year growth with a very high Average Revenue Per Customer?
1 Kings 12:11
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
15359
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 13:40:00 -
[24] - Quote
Sex Slave Girl wrote:Let's talk about the good and bad stuff that comes with it. Ok.
Good things: CCP can now focus on developing Dust and World of Darkness.
Bad things: revenue from EVE will approach zero; not enough devs will be kept around to reprogram every single mechanic to account for what happens when alts become free; players will leave in droves; new players are still as uninterested in EVE as ever since price was never a factor that kept anyone away; the economy tanks; server closure in less than 12 months. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan 2.0. |

Johnnie Blue
FREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEDOOOOOOOOM silent requiem
18
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 13:44:00 -
[25] - Quote
http://elite.frontier.co.uk
|

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Turing Tested
554
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 13:45:00 -
[26] - Quote
Johnnie Blue wrote:http://elite.frontier.co.uk
If only Ian Bell was involved
Lets see, Braben's successes in the last 20 years
Kinectimals
that is all " Ramona McCandless, you're my hero." - Domanique Altares, Rifterlings, Point Blank Alliance
Tell The Others |

Johnnie Blue
FREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEDOOOOOOOOM silent requiem
18
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 13:50:00 -
[27] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Johnnie Blue wrote:http://elite.frontier.co.uk
If only Ian Bell was involved Lets see, Braben's successes in the last 20 years Kinectimals that is all
Yeh I agree. But, take a look at the video. It looks good and lets face it, most of what we can see in eve can be traced back to elite.
|

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Turing Tested
555
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 14:23:00 -
[28] - Quote
Johnnie Blue wrote:
Yeh I agree. But, take a look at the video. It looks good and lets face it, most of what we can see in eve can be traced back to elite.
I know I know
I want a Fer de Lance or an Asp so bad it hurts
but
I can't bring myself to be optimistic
Not now
Not Again
Not ever " Ramona McCandless, you're my hero." - Domanique Altares, Rifterlings, Point Blank Alliance
Tell The Others |

Elvis Fett
Quantum Cats Syndicate Samurai Pizza Cats
216
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 15:11:00 -
[29] - Quote
Chribba wrote:I rather see a future with less trolls.
/c
You're dreaming son. A future with less trolls is less likely than a future with no war. |

Paul Panala
Beyond the Shadows
56
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 15:16:00 -
[30] - Quote
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJqsLgIRvys |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Turing Tested
558
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 15:17:00 -
[31] - Quote
Elvis Fett wrote: "A future with less trolls is less likely than a future with no war." - Winston Churchill
Love it " Ramona McCandless, you're my hero." - Domanique Altares, Rifterlings, Point Blank Alliance
Tell The Others |

Debora Tsung
The Investment Bankers Guild
163
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 15:26:00 -
[32] - Quote
Victoria Sin wrote:Chribba wrote:I rather see a future with less trolls.
/c Fewer.
Fever.
I see a future with fever trolls.
We'll have to use fire to put them down. There's nothing a million chinese guys can't do cheaper. |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Turing Tested
558
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 15:28:00 -
[33] - Quote
Debora Tsung wrote:Victoria Sin wrote:Chribba wrote:I rather see a future with less trolls.
/c Fewer. Fever. I see a future with fever trolls. We'll have to use fire to put them down.
+1
You go girl :D " Ramona McCandless, you're my hero." - Domanique Altares, Rifterlings, Point Blank Alliance
Tell The Others |

Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
4863
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 15:32:00 -
[34] - Quote
Pardon me, but may I inquire as to the reasoning behind this repeated bludgeoning of a deceased equine? Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings? |

Sex Slave Girl
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
94
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 15:37:00 -
[35] - Quote
You guys are just scared of wallet warriors. Buying Titans in a deal package for $ 9.99. |

Murk Paradox
Red Tsunami The Cursed Few
420
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 15:47:00 -
[36] - Quote
Sex Slave Girl wrote:Let's talk about the good and bad stuff that comes with it.
For starters, I think the active eve population will go up, by a lot. Possible reaching 200.000 players on a normal day.
I also think, we will have 4~7 cloaky neutrals in every null sec system, that afk all day.
Jita will stil be limited to roughly 2000 players, but instead. The entire constellation will be nearly full. Reaching Jita would be impossible.
Suicide freighter ganks are more easily attained. As 1 guy could get 150 free to play accounts and use rifters to suicide on 1 Freighter.
The bittervets and other old carebear people will quit the game. But instead for every one of them, eve online gets 30 free to play players (who would probably never pay or barely go for microtransactions).
Time Dilation is a natural thing, as it will affect everyone, for the whole time. Fleet op Fights will probably resulting in a lot of server crashes.
But there are some good things too that come with it. We will have more people to play with! I, believe that eve online currently is a stable game, and due to this, will attract a lot of new players if it were to become free to play.
However the game will be changed so much, it won't be eve as we know it.
I don't think half of that increase in playerbase would be able to manage getting past 1 month of playing truth be told.
If your prophecy comes true that is.
You might have the fear of p2win and f2play et al, but I seriously think you overestimate the ability of that type of gamer.
"Never rub another man's rhubarb." -Joker in Batman (Jack Nicholson) Just get a catalyst, blow him up and the post in local "Just a friendly reminder that I'm mining here and not you." -Abrazzar
|

Deacon Abox
Justified Chaos
141
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 15:47:00 -
[37] - Quote
Sex Slave Girl wrote:You guys are just scared of wallet warriors. Buying Titans in a deal package for $ 9.99. How much do you cost?  |

Capt Gauss
WhiteFang Industries
4
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 15:52:00 -
[38] - Quote
Deacon Abox wrote:Sex Slave Girl wrote:You guys are just scared of wallet warriors. Buying Titans in a deal package for $ 9.99. How much do you cost? 
$4.99 on Saturday Nights ;)
During the weekdays of course it'll cost you 500 million Interstellar Kredits |

Soylent Jade
New Order Logistics CODE.
18
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 15:57:00 -
[39] - Quote
Sex Slave Girl wrote:I also think, we will have 4~7 cloaky neutrals in every null sec system, that afk all day.
This would be hilarious, but not worth the influx of Freetards.
BTW, your avatar just isn't the same without the massive boobs poking me in the eyes. Making hisec better...one Catalyst at a time
minerbumping.com |

Navi Hasseleh
Megaton m3 Heavy Industries
0
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 16:20:00 -
[40] - Quote
You must not be a taxpayer and your income must be derived from some sort of government welfare system.
If Eve were free to play, then the computer hardware and the other infrastructure needed to operate the game would have to be donated by somebody.
The management team and the software developers would be working for free because they love what they do. They would have no home, no car, would beg for food, and constantly be in court to argue with the ex-wife or ex-husband who divorced them about child support payments and alimony.
I think the last time your frigate blew up, you were cracked in the head by shrapnel and some of your implants' wiring is all screwed up now.
Either that or your are loony.
Considering how much I play Eve, they should be charging me double what I currently pay. I pay in real money on an annual basis. |

Evei Shard
202
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 16:26:00 -
[41] - Quote
Eve cannot go f2p with its current account model.
Heck, I'd open more accounts myself and see just how many I could control without needing something like isboxer.
The number of accounts would skyrocket even if you just had the current player base, without the injection of the f2p crowd.
Eve can't go full-on brainless f2p without an incredible amount of change that would make a lot of people unhappy.
Then again, I think we've all seen other games that are examples which show that cash is king, and appeasing the investors is the only thing that matters. Investors have proven that they are greedy, impatient, uncaring non-players who are easily attracted to shiny "new business models" that promise a quick profit. Profit favors the prepared |

Sex Slave Girl
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
94
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 21:28:00 -
[42] - Quote
Soylent Jade wrote:Sex Slave Girl wrote:I also think, we will have 4~7 cloaky neutrals in every null sec system, that afk all day.
This would be hilarious, but not worth the influx of Freetards. BTW, your avatar just isn't the same without the massive boobs poking me in the eyes.
I know but this Forum is rated PG 13+ so it had to be changed. |

Mr Kidd
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
1248
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 22:49:00 -
[43] - Quote
Sex Slave Girl wrote:Let's talk about the good and bad stuff that comes with it.
I really miss your old avatar pic.....why did you change it.....WHY!!!!!!?!??!?????
BTW, Eve is already F2P and has been since the introduction of breasts.....I mean plex!
HTFU!...for the children! |

Max Deveron
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 03:01:00 -
[44] - Quote
FREE TO PLAY??? FREE TO PLAY?? Are you out of your frakking mind? The only FPS that needs to exsist here in EvE is the ability to create a corp get a group going and everyone in it find a way to use the in game ability to make enough isk to plex ur accounts.....thats as far FPS needs to go.
Really OP....you are just plain dumb. If I wanted play games like Star Trek Online, Black Prohecy, etc with their supposed FPS but i can pay for advantages with cash idea but be limited in how i want to play with arena style play for pvp and the like (wow comes to mind here) and no sense of loss or risk which means no sense of accomplishment then i would not be playing EvE....go back where you came from and STFU. |

Aiwha
Infinite Point Nulli Secunda
568
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 03:06:00 -
[45] - Quote
The bot spam is bad enough with the trial accounts. We're winning the war if it says so on CAOD! -á
|

Varius Xeral
Galactic Trade Syndicate
1156
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 03:08:00 -
[46] - Quote
It's funny listening to people talk about F2P likes it some revolution in the gaming industry and not just the sad result of a bunch of misguided and ill-considered attempts to recreate the singular success of warcraft.
Market standard subscriptions are either insignificant or nearly so, it's just the industry's going through a "lost-ball-in-tall-grass" period and can't create an MMO that's worth playing for more than three months.
The industry should be looking to what CCP has done with Eve, not the other way around. Official Representative of The Nullsec Zealot Cabal |

Felicity Love
Whore and Peace
849
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 03:59:00 -
[47] - Quote
Sex Slave Girl wrote:
But there are some good things too that come with it. We will have more people to play with!
However the game will be changed so much, it won't be eve as we know it.
A) Said "more people" won't like undock anymore than the current crowd and B) the game of "EVE as we know it" is going to take a bit of an erratic run for awhile anyway. These things happen when senior devs quit/leave/find a better deal somewhere else.
Sigh.
Proud Beta Tester for "Bumping Uglies for Dummies" |

Sir Substance
I N E X T R E M I S Gentlemen's Agreement
613
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 05:30:00 -
[48] - Quote
Eve online will never go free to play.
The free to play maneuver is about building up player numbers.
It's done either because you are losing players (noone will play a game that noone else plays, so if people start leaving it forms a negative spiral, free to play can interrupt that), or because your business model is best served by huge numbers of players.
Whilst the latter sounds obvious and universally applicable, you must understand, Eve's business model does not revolve around large numbers of players.
Eve has a maximum user limit. Because it's on a single server, there's a hardware based cap on how many people it can service at once, and that cap is almost certainly lower then the influx of people we would see if eve went free to play.
Basically, if eve went free to play the only thing that would happen is it would crash the server, and everyone would leave because the server was perpetually unstable. To go free to play, eve would have to go multi-server, and then it wouldn't be eve.
Eve's secret sauce has always been in long term player retention. Eve doesn't need free to play. Keep wishing, it'll never happen. Ishtar Starfire: As a pure caldari pilot i feel that with the deployment of the new tier 3 battlecruisers you have given an unfair advantage to everyone except caldari pilots. an example would be like giving a fat kid a whole cake while the skinny kid has to watch and get nothing.
|

Just Lilly
122
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 05:43:00 -
[49] - Quote
Bots would go on a rampage, beyond the ever so watchful eyes of CCP Games.
And destroy the market in less than six months. Powered by Nvidia GTX 690 |

Eugene Kerner
TunDraGon
820
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 06:40:00 -
[50] - Quote
well... the thing is-...very interesting
"Also, your boobs " -á CCP Eterne, 2012
|

Jessi Burns
Yancey and Bruns Incorporated
0
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 10:34:00 -
[51] - Quote
I find the fear to be hilarious. Easy solution is new servers. Many people would migrate for a the feel of what it would be like to start from the beginning. People appear to think that eve would be invaded instantly by hundreds of thousands, but I don't. Eve is still the most difficult game to learn and play, so the likelihood of an invasion of noobs is very slim. |

Judith Frozenvoid
Cryogenic Consultancy
0
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 10:43:00 -
[52] - Quote
lock this thread it's dumb. |

ExcalibursTemplar
Citadel Enterprises
8
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 11:11:00 -
[53] - Quote
Considering I've just spent -ú180 subbing two accounts for the next 12 months id be extremely pissed of if eve turned free to play anytime soon.
|

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
11691
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 12:13:00 -
[54] - Quote
EVE is already as "F2P" as it needs to be. Why on earth should CCP abandon the extremely successful, constructive, gameplay-supportive PLEX model for the discredited, corrupt pay-to-win model?
Because make no mistake, there would be absolutely no alternative to putting P2W in the cash shop if EVE went free to play. Either that or we'd see a huge reduction in the amount of resources that CCP could invest in the game. EVE players are notoriously pragmatic and result-focused (that's as nicely as I can put it) and the opportunitues for meaningful "vanity" products like avatar clothing are limited because as a rule, no one else sees them.
In order to replace the ~$7.5M/month that CCP get from subs and plex sales (and let's not forget that that figure has been steadily increasing this last couple of years), they'd need to sell a hell of a lot of monocles. I just don't see EVE players buying that many, month after month.
"Oh but Malc, what about those other games that went F2P and saw an increase in revenue?"
Well for one thing, those games were on life support and tanking hard. That "increase" was from a very low starting point. Meanwhile, EVE's subs have been increasing nicely.
And all those games sell things like experience potions or content unlocks that would be very ill-received by this community and classed as "P2W".
1 Kings 12:11
|

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
11691
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 12:14:00 -
[55] - Quote
Jessi Burns wrote:I find the fear to be hilarious. Easy solution is new servers. Many people would migrate for a the feel of what it would be like to start from the beginning. People appear to think that eve would be invaded instantly by hundreds of thousands, but I don't. Eve is still the most difficult game to learn and play, so the likelihood of an invasion of noobs is very slim.
Exactly. I don't think the sub fee is a big deal for the kind of people who play EVE.
1 Kings 12:11
|

The VC's
Spack Force 5
156
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 12:20:00 -
[56] - Quote
Eve is already practically free to play if you play smart. The IQ barrier is a good thing. This game isn't for everyone. One in five people are Chinese. There are five people in my family, so one must be Chinese. It's either my mum, my dad, my older brother Colin or my younger brother Ho-Cha-Chu. But I think it's Colin |

Skeln Thargensen
Alpha Sperglords
192
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 13:37:00 -
[57] - Quote
PLEX is such an elegant solution for both 'F2P' and gold selling that they'd have to be completely mental to change it. freelance space bum |

Cannibal Kane
My Little Ponies of the Apocalypse
2386
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 13:41:00 -
[58] - Quote
As if CCP really needs more people complaining that they should have not been able to be killed for doing something stupid.
"I saw him fight by the monument in Jita. -áHe flowed in his Machariel like a Shinto spirit, 800MM shells sprouting in his passing. -áHis hair flowed in the corona of his target's warp core breach. -áIt was truly majestic. -áAnd while everyone stared in awe I stole the loot and ran off.-áBecause I am like that." --áNEONOVUS |

Roime
Quantum Cats Syndicate Samurai Pizza Cats
3404
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 13:42:00 -
[59] - Quote
Future EVE Online: NPC corp alts are not allowed to post on the forums, and badposters are permabanned for stupid ideas.
Standard moderation policies like this have proven to increase subscription rates by 25-40% in MMOs.
. |

Caliph Muhammed
Perkone Caldari State
512
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 13:43:00 -
[60] - Quote
Jessi Burns wrote:I find the fear to be hilarious. Easy solution is new servers. Many people would migrate for a the feel of what it would be like to start from the beginning. People appear to think that eve would be invaded instantly by hundreds of thousands, but I don't. Eve is still the most difficult game to learn and play, so the likelihood of an invasion of noobs is very slim.
You have exactly zero clue about what you speak of. F2P is the death knell of games. Period. End of discussion. |

Caliph Muhammed
Perkone Caldari State
512
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 13:46:00 -
[61] - Quote
Roime wrote:Future EVE Online: NPC corp alts are not allowed to post on the forums, and badposters are permabanned for stupid ideas.
Standard moderation policies like this have proven to increase subscription rates by 25-40% in MMOs.
I could get behind this. The difference though must be clear. Censorship strangles the community but true moderation of bad ideas would be a god send. |

Yeep
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
387
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 13:50:00 -
[62] - Quote
Jessi Burns wrote:Many people would migrate for a the feel of what it would be like to start from the beginning.
You can't start from the beginning even on a new server. The current state of Eve is a product of people's skillpoints and the processes and events that caused them to train those skills. Having a second server be any kind of balanced would mean maintaining a second code base. |

Druthlen
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
8
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 13:54:00 -
[63] - Quote
If eve f2p I teh quit. |

Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3821
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 14:01:00 -
[64] - Quote
If done properly then sure. If done by offering OP ships & ammo for cash, no. RIP Scamming; CCP has finally acknowledged that the average gamer is too stupid to avoid being scammed & has decided to protect them from themselves with TOS changes that effectively ban the practice. |

flakeys
Antwerpse Kerels Fidelas Constans
1421
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 14:06:00 -
[65] - Quote
I can only think of one good thing to introduce eve FTP : it will get flooded with people who'll go literally insane from the trolling , scamming , suiciding and general eve-habbits we all enjoy so much about this game. 
Well that is untill the TOS has changed so much in the first 3 months that eve will no longer be that cold harsh world we like to drama-talk about.
We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
|

Chandaris
Immortalis Inc. Shadow Cartel
413
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 14:10:00 -
[66] - Quote
Eve is already F2P. you just have to not be terrible at it. |

flakeys
Antwerpse Kerels Fidelas Constans
1421
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 14:11:00 -
[67] - Quote
Chandaris wrote:Eve is already F2P. you just have to not be terrible at it.
More like SEWP ... Someone Else Will Pay , i love plex's 
We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
|

Johan Civire
The Lyran Empire
638
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 14:30:00 -
[68] - Quote
Sex Slave Girl wrote:Let's talk about the good and bad stuff that comes with it.
For starters, I think the active eve population will go up, by a lot. Possible reaching 200.000 players on a normal day.
I also think, we will have 4~7 cloaky neutrals in every null sec system, that afk all day.
Jita will stil be limited to roughly 2000 players, but instead. The entire constellation will be nearly full. Reaching Jita would be impossible.
Suicide freighter ganks are more easily attained. As 1 guy could get 150 free to play accounts and use rifters to suicide on 1 Freighter.
The bittervets and other old carebear people will quit the game. But instead for every one of them, eve online gets 30 free to play players (who would probably never pay or barely go for microtransactions).
Time Dilation is a natural thing, as it will affect everyone, for the whole time. Fleet op Fights will probably resulting in a lot of server crashes.
But there are some good things too that come with it. We will have more people to play with! I, believe that eve online currently is a stable game, and due to this, will attract a lot of new players if it were to become free to play.
However the game will be changed so much, it won't be eve as we know it.
No just no if eve become free to play I quit for sure. No need to have kids flying around and isk sellers publish the website in local no thanks. Eve free to play its not the way to go eve is not based like World of warcraft to get ass many people in the world to play. Eve like money but that's not the case here. The know if the make it free to play it will get more money but the game is rune. And the dream is gone. More people will not say its a better game. See world of warcraft and every other MMORPG the are most of them are dead boring just plain dead eve in the other hand have a future still not complete so the have tons of options the can do with the game. Some one was just that smart 10 years ago to think about it. I don't know his name or I give him the credits because he or more is the one that made eve what it is and not a dying mmorpg sins the start.
Thumbs down for this threat. |

Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
1220
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 14:40:00 -
[69] - Quote
Roime wrote:Future EVE Online: NPC corp alts are not allowed to post on the forums, and badposters are permabanned for stupid ideas.
Standard moderation policies like this have proven to increase subscription rates by 25-40% in MMOs.
Yes please do this lets see what happens, that would be quite hilarious for many little reasons  *removed inappropriate ASCII art signature* - CCP Eterne |

Desivo Delta Visseroff
Cedar Knolls Research STEEL BROTHERHOOD
20
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 14:43:00 -
[70] - Quote
Never! Free 2 Play is a LIE. It is never free. It is a trap and the ultimate scam brought about by companies like EA and their greedy, filthy and abhorrent ilk.  |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
11705
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 15:01:00 -
[71] - Quote
Skeln Thargensen wrote:PLEX is such an elegant solution for both 'F2P' and gold selling that they'd have to be completely mental to change it.
This is such a good sentence that I'd like to give everyone the opportunity to enjoy reading it again.
1 Kings 12:11
|

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
11705
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 15:04:00 -
[72] - Quote
Yeep wrote:Jessi Burns wrote:Many people would migrate for a the feel of what it would be like to start from the beginning. You can't start from the beginning even on a new server. The current state of Eve is a product of people's skillpoints and the processes and events that caused them to train those skills. Having a second server be any kind of balanced would mean maintaining a second code base.
More to the point, existing player organisations are hugely better organised and there have massively more supporting resources (EVE survival, evemon, Dotlan, etc etc etc).
Not only would CCP need a "new code base" to give us that 'beginning of EVE' feel, they'd need to make a whole new game.
1 Kings 12:11
|

Caviar Liberta
Moira. Villore Accords
172
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 15:15:00 -
[73] - Quote
Ammzi wrote:OP, please biomass.
But before you do, you can contract all your stuff and transfer all your isk to me.
Thanks |

Lord Ryan
True Xero True Zombies
850
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 15:15:00 -
[74] - Quote
WOOT! WOOT!
Do not assume-áanything above this line-áwas typed by me. Nerf the Truth, it's inconvenient.
|

Dersen Lowery
Laurentson INC StructureDamage
774
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 15:16:00 -
[75] - Quote
I see that the Federal Navy Academy is now accepting legacy admissions. Proud founder and member of the Belligerent Desirables. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4572
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 15:21:00 -
[76] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Skeln Thargensen wrote:PLEX is such an elegant solution for both 'F2P' and gold selling that they'd have to be completely mental to change it. This is such a good sentence that I'd like to give everyone the opportunity to enjoy reading it again. You're right there There are no goons. The goons' 0.0 dream is over.
"Progodlegend said the goal of N3 is to destroy Goonswarm Federation, but in reality NCdot is in Fountain due to the fact it is virtually the last place there is action." ~NC., Fountain 2013 |

Skydell
Bad Girl Posse Somethin Awfull Forums
571
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 15:46:00 -
[77] - Quote
It would destroy EVE Online.
No matter how many restrictions you put on the free account, much like skills and assets, it''s secondary to numbers. Blob trumps in EVE. Expect people to have upwards of 2000 accounts where the situation demands it. CCP has said the game will handle 100K online at any time. That number would cap out in the first month.
As it is right now, anyone industrious enough to look can get a 2 month throw away account for $5.00 US. It doesn't make EVE a stronger game. Free EVE would be the nail in the coffin. No and's if's or but's.
|

Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
2954
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 16:53:00 -
[78] - Quote
Do people really think it would be a good idea to have CCP shut the game down for six months to a year while it's completely rebuilt from the ground up to be free to play? Because that's the only way to turn a game designed from the ground up to be a sub based game into a F2P.
I know I'm not keen on seeing that happen.
Mr Epeen  There are 86,400 seconds in a day. You just saved one of them by typing 'u' instead of 'you'.-á Congratulations, dumbass! |

Utremi Fasolasi
La Dolce Vita
276
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 17:15:00 -
[79] - Quote
Chribba wrote:I rather see a future with less trolls.
/c
Spoken like a true son of Thorr.  |

Djana Libra
DAB The Unthinkables
282
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 17:52:00 -
[80] - Quote
Victoria Sin wrote:I preferred Eve when peak was 4k players. It really was like the Wild West back then. I failed very hard at playing it though. It's a lot easier now. 
too easy |

Revman Zim
Grim Determination Nulli Secunda
193
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 19:08:00 -
[81] - Quote
"Talking about EVE Online, that is still the example of how to do things in the post - WoW era. While CCP thought they were becoming the dinosaur of the industry, and therefore had to implement a cash shop with micro transactions. They realized their mistakes in time ( after their customers reminded them where their loyalty must lie Riots-in-eve-against-microtransactions ). And turned around and got back on track making EVE Online a better game.
CCP is being rewarded now, with a PCU ( peak concurrent users ) of over 65.000 and over 500.000 monthly playing subscribers and a continued growth every year since release, now more than 10 years ago.
At this moment EVE Online is the second biggest subscription based MMORPG in the west, and the only subscription based MMORPG that is still growing in the west and probably in the world.
If you make a game for gamers, with good features, it will sell and people will pay a monthly fee."
The entire article can be found here:
http://mmodata.blogspot.com/
Along with graphs of MMO subscriptions.
*emphasis mine |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
1321
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 21:14:00 -
[82] - Quote
ExcalibursTemplar wrote:Considering I've just spent -ú180 subbing two accounts for the next 12 months id be extremely pissed of if eve turned free to play anytime soon.
Same here.
Even more so as I would not be able to rage quit, well, not for almost twelve months This is not a signature. |

Harry Forever
SpaceJunkys
774
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 21:34:00 -
[83] - Quote
Sex Slave Girl wrote:Let's talk about the good and bad stuff that comes with it.
For starters, I think the active eve population will go up, by a lot. Possible reaching 200.000 players on a normal day.
I also think, we will have 4~7 cloaky neutrals in every null sec system, that afk all day.
Jita will stil be limited to roughly 2000 players, but instead. The entire constellation will be nearly full. Reaching Jita would be impossible.
Suicide freighter ganks are more easily attained. As 1 guy could get 150 free to play accounts and use rifters to suicide on 1 Freighter.
The bittervets and other old carebear people will quit the game. But instead for every one of them, eve online gets 30 free to play players (who would probably never pay or barely go for microtransactions).
Time Dilation is a natural thing, as it will affect everyone, for the whole time. Fleet op Fights will probably resulting in a lot of server crashes.
But there are some good things too that come with it. We will have more people to play with! I, believe that eve online currently is a stable game, and due to this, will attract a lot of new players if it were to become free to play.
However the game will be changed so much, it won't be eve as we know it.
it is already free to play ... |

Uncle Traveling Matt
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 21:37:00 -
[84] - Quote
The golden age (or should I call it the copper age) of F2P MMO's is nearing an end.
A couple years ago it was all the rage, but I think the end result of games like SW:TOR and LOTRO is that they are complete and utter failures. New and Upcoming MMO's are rethinking that plan and opting for subscription models again. (EQ-N, Elder Scrolls...) Rest in peace, free-to-play.
Matt
|

Jonah Gravenstein
Sweet Sensations Radical Industries
13865
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 21:50:00 -
[85] - Quote
Harry Forever wrote: it is already free to play
So PLEX magically appears from nowhere? It might appear to be free to play, however extending game time with PLEX still involves somebody giving CCP real life cash, more so than a subscription. I am furnishing this post "as is" I do not provide any warranty whatsoever, whether express, implied, or statutory, including, but not limited to, any relevance or fitness for purpose or any warranty that the contents herein are error-free.
|

Murk Paradox
Duty. The Cursed Few
509
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 21:53:00 -
[86] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Harry Forever wrote: it is already free to play
So PLEX magically appears from nowhere? It might appear to be free to play, however extending game time with PLEX still involves somebody giving CCP real life cash, more so than a subscription.
Well, until you get paid in game cash by second just for being logged in... "free" is relative.
And technically, plex is not a manufactured product. This post has been signed by Murk Paradox and no other accounts, alternate or otherwise. Any other post claiming to be this holder's is subject to being banned at the discretion of the GM Team as it would violate the TOS in regards to impersonation. Signed, Murk Paradox. In triplicate. |

M1k3y Koontz
Thorn Project Surely You're Joking
307
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 22:16:00 -
[87] - Quote
F2P would kill EVE.
EVE players are religiously anti-microtransaction, and $15/10 pounds a month for a game that doesn't require you to P2Win sounds like a damn good deal.
TL;DR, EVE will remain subscription based or I, and a large chunk of EVE's current player base, will quit and EVE will die with a whimper in a whirlwind of microtransactions. How much herp could a herp derp derp if a herp derp could herp derp. |

James Akachi
Perkone Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 23:08:00 -
[88] - Quote
Lots of people have kneejerk negative reactions to the concept of Free To Play. Indeed upon the announcement of Rift transitioning to F2P there was as expected many threats of unsubbing, etc. And the response? "OK, have fun, and if you feel like playing again you can do that without giving us a cent." And since the transition there have never been more active players.
Games tanking after they go F2P is not from the business model, it's from implementing the business model in a way that is incompatible with your game or player base. This can happen whether it was originally designed to be F2P or not. The "microtransactions" in Rift could most easily be compared with if Eve started selling T1 modules and subcaps and boosters additionally for real money, but not T2s and capital ships. Of course they can already be purchased for real money in a way due to PLEX, so it's a very different proposition in more than one way.
I do not think free-to-play would work for Eve but that is not because free-to-play is bad, but because it would not benefit the game. On the other hand, if handled properly, I don't think it would be terrible either. The primary consideration would be handling the influx of players no longer restricted by the initial wall of subscription payment. In gameplay terms, I am sure there are many who would enjoy "handling" such players. In hardware/software terms, that is where the difficulty lies. |

Solstice Project
I'm So Meta Even This Acronym
3960
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 00:20:00 -
[89] - Quote
Wow, so many fell for it... |

Ivan Krividus
Born Crazy
13
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 00:39:00 -
[90] - Quote
EVE is free. Its called PLEX. If it were FTP from the start then EVE will lose some of its ability to filter out ex-WoW players. FTP game communities are always bad.
In addition i like EVE as a tight, cozy, mature community. EVE is my refuge from the crap communities of LoL, CoD (Disclaimer: i dont play CoD), other games, and the entire internet in general. Of all the things i enjoy in eve, that is the most special to me. |

Janna Sway
46
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 01:16:00 -
[91] - Quote
It's really not that hard to earn a PLEX a month, and if you cannot afford 15 EUR/month, then you should maybe not play at all but find a second job. |

Tysinger
Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation
89
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 01:19:00 -
[92] - Quote
EVE is already "free to play"
Pretty damn easy to make 500m in a month and buy a plex...Jus sayin.
I have, umm a few accounts and I have not payed for years, and I am NOT a miner or mission runner.
lrn2play kk |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4576
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 01:19:00 -
[93] - Quote
Uncle Traveling Matt wrote:The golden age (or should I call it the copper age) of F2P MMO's is nearing an end.
A couple years ago it was all the rage, but I think the end result of games like SW:TOR and LOTRO is that they are complete and utter failures. So... FTP for eve online, then There are no goons. The goons' 0.0 dream is over.
"Progodlegend said the goal of N3 is to destroy Goonswarm Federation, but in reality NCdot is in Fountain due to the fact it is virtually the last place there is action." ~NC., Fountain 2013 |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4576
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 01:20:00 -
[94] - Quote
the joke is that eve is dying like an alliance trying to survive in Curse after losing its sov There are no goons. The goons' 0.0 dream is over.
"Progodlegend said the goal of N3 is to destroy Goonswarm Federation, but in reality NCdot is in Fountain due to the fact it is virtually the last place there is action." ~NC., Fountain 2013 |

Freakdevil
Aliastra Gallente Federation
64
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 01:34:00 -
[95] - Quote
EVE F2P: your FREE TO PLAY another game
|

Uncle Traveling Matt
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 13:15:00 -
[96] - Quote
Tysinger wrote:EVE is already "free to play"
Pretty damn easy to make 500m in a month and buy a plex...Jus sayin.
I have, umm a few accounts and I have not payed for years, and I am NOT a miner or mission runner.
lrn2play kk
600m now....just sayin. 
Matt
|

Johan Civire
The Lyran Empire
655
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 13:17:00 -
[97] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:ExcalibursTemplar wrote:Considering I've just spent -ú180 subbing two accounts for the next 12 months id be extremely pissed of if eve turned free to play anytime soon.
Same here. Even more so as I would not be able to rage quit, well, not for almost twelve months 
Why are you upset by it ? it is already free to play pal. The only differed about it you need to do something for it that's the defriend against other free to play games.
Well for me its already more then 1 year free to play I have give zero money. I just farm my plexs on time and the game is free.
There is no Future about free to play it is already more then 1 year free to play. You people are so outdate and raging about something that's already a old thing........ end of topic. |

Dave Stark
3726
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 13:26:00 -
[98] - Quote
i'd be interested to see eve go free to log in, but still require plex to train things. |

Freako X
Doom Inc
97
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 16:28:00 -
[99] - Quote
I don't understand why it has to be sub vs. F2P.
I'd like to see an increase in services: name change, ship skins, outfits, station skins, Captain Quarter furniture and deco options, sp increase services, racial change services, respec services, etc.
I recently revisited RIFT and that store is amazing. I spent too much money there (on test and live) ..... The bonuses to subscribe are also pretty darned nice too. ie. EVE could give a sp increase bonus to people that subscribe. I would continue my sub.
Anyway, why can't we have both sub's and F2P?
$14.95 / month = SP bonus say 10%, Store Credit, 15% savings in store. $7.50 / month = Store Credit, 7% savings in store. F2P = F2P with Store at full retail.
Just a thought ..... |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
16582
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 16:48:00 -
[100] - Quote
Freako X wrote:I don't understand why it has to be sub vs. F2P. Largely because they're vastly different and almost completely incompatible business models. One relies on providing a solid game full of content; the other relies on withholding all the game content. The progression you have to design for these different schemes is itself so different that it is pretty much impossible to not make one vastly better than the other, thereby making at least one model completely pointless. Most likely, both will be awful and the game will just tank.
Remember, they're not just payment schemes GÇö they're different models for teasing money out of your customers: either offering everything to everyone at equal cost, or offering something to some people at varying cost (with the implicit, or occasionally ven explicit promise that if you spend more, you'll be better off than those who pay less).
A F2P+sub game would actually only be a F2P game, only you can buy a season pass or one of the higher payment reward tiers.
The problem in EVE, specifically, is that being able to pay for only the parts you want would be so ridiculously open to abuse as to make the whole thing unplayable. Alts are already something of an issue, but imagine if they were free. The fact that you have to subscribe to access even the most simplistic market or cyno alt keeps their numbers in check and ensures that people will actually build more coherent characters over a longer period of time, rather than just distribute the tasks over 120 different characters.
GǪand as a side-note, it's always fun to see how these threads always draw out the people who think that PLEX are somehow F2P even though there's nothing free about them and you still have to maintain your subscription to play. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan 2.0. |

Solstice Project's Alt
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
34
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 17:28:00 -
[101] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:i'd be interested to see eve go free to log in, but still require plex to train things. This is actually a remarkable idea !
They'd have more people logged in, (which looks good at the login) but these people barely consume ressources, as they can only ... what.
Well obviously ... chat. That's a great feature, because a lot of people just log in to talk with their friends anyway.
But we could actually extend that...
"Shuttle" flights made by paying players, to move the "free" player around stations. All usual dangers apply. The "free" player could be allowed to trade locally and allowed to create courier contracts.
Obviously this means the free player also gains access to his wallet, but he has only a very limited range of things to do with his ISK.
That way, the free player would still contribute to the sandbox, but not consume a lot of ressources.
^_^
(this doesn't attract any new players at all, btw ...) |

Dave Stark
3727
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 17:34:00 -
[102] - Quote
Solstice Project's Alt wrote:(this doesn't attract any new players at all, btw ...) but it would arguably encourage people to reactivate inactive accounts. |

Solstice Project's Alt
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
34
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 18:04:00 -
[103] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:Solstice Project's Alt wrote:(this doesn't attract any new players at all, btw ...) but it would arguably encourage people to reactivate inactive accounts. Yes ! And a free, reactivated account has a higher possibility of resubbing than an inactive account. ^_^ Social interaction helps a lot to push too. ^_^ |

Dave Stark
3728
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 18:08:00 -
[104] - Quote
Solstice Project's Alt wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Solstice Project's Alt wrote:(this doesn't attract any new players at all, btw ...) but it would arguably encourage people to reactivate inactive accounts. Yes ! And a free, reactivated account has a higher possibility of resubbing than an inactive account. ^_^ Social interaction helps a lot to push too. ^_^
i won't lie, i have an almost perfect miner on an inactive account. i just want to use it without paying for it. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4594
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 18:10:00 -
[105] - Quote
Tippia wrote: offering something to some people at varying cost (with the implicit, or occasionally ven explicit promise that if you spend more, you'll be better off than those who pay less). I see, this is part of progodlegend's plan to destroy GSF There are no goons. The goons' 0.0 dream is over.
"Progodlegend said the goal of N3 is to destroy Goonswarm Federation, but in reality NCdot is in Fountain due to the fact it is virtually the last place there is action." ~NC., Fountain 2013 |

Alaric Faelen
Sabotage Incorporated Executive Outcomes
149
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 18:17:00 -
[106] - Quote
my .02, I loathe Free To Play because it usually means Pay To Win. I don't even really like the RMT in PLEX for a 'free' billion isk.
I joined Eve years ago on the same basic monthly sub and have absolutely no problem with that. That system, while hopelessly quaint in a world of FTP games and microtransactions, is not broken to begin with. CCP provides me with a service, I give them pocket change each month in return.
Anything more complicated is just a way to squeeze a few cents more, which I don't appreciate considering I never once have had a 'free' month of Eve subscription since starting. I've never tried to dodge paying for a product I use all the time, but feel like the ability for people to do so comes at the cost of having to make up that differential somewhere else- like FTP microtransaction schemes. (Insert US tax-code joke here)
In fact, I rather like the dynamic Eve has. One could actually consider their monthly sub a payment plan on the 'free' expansions. However I look at it, I'm a satisfied customer and think a steady income stream provides, in the long term especially, a better product.
To each his own, but for me personally going FTP and having more than monocles for microtransactions is probably the only thing that would make me seriously consider leaving Eve. |

Seetesh
ENEBRIATED MINERS Ltd Iron State
78
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 20:00:00 -
[107] - Quote
No i'd rather kill myself then see this game go F2P. |

Ishtanchuk Fazmarai
1907
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 20:13:00 -
[108] - Quote
The F2P conundrum: extend the trial to unlimited time, but with the same limitations as it haves now. Former subscribers retain everything they had, but can't train further without spending money. The Greater Fool Bar is now open for business, 24/7. Come and have drinks and fun somewhere between RL and New Eden! |

Johan Civire
The Lyran Empire
656
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 20:29:00 -
[109] - Quote
Seetesh wrote:No i'd rather kill myself then see this game go F2P.
It is F2P so when do i get your stuff? |

DaRk'TaLoN90
Rational Anarchists Brave Collective
5
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 22:22:00 -
[110] - Quote
Sure, Jita will be capped almost 24/7, isn't it already? Honestly though, I don't think that it will get to the point where an entire constellation will be capped out. Maybe the trade routes between all the hubs will be much more crowded and a lot more dangerous... but as always players will adapt to the new conditions. As a bonus I can see new and old players alike using the other trade hubs a lot more, and for good or bad, the other trade hubs will probably become just like Jita. |

Abulurd Boniface
The Scope Gallente Federation
38
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 23:12:00 -
[111] - Quote
Sex Slave Girl wrote:Let's talk about the good and bad stuff that comes with it.
I have not seen a single good idea in all of this.
Free to play invites people who do not understand nor want to invest in EVE. These people will never play for a game that is as hysterically complex as EVE is. Why would they invest in something like that? It'll take them years to fly something called a titan. Who wants to do that? Not them.
More important though, far more important, is that the people who do pay will expect to win. Not for them the constraints of the game. They pay therefor they expect to gain an advantage.
OP indicated this will drive away the current crop of players, which though true is apparently not a problem, more players will come in. CCP will benefit from the influx and EVE Online will thrive in times immemorial.
This will not happen. The character of EVE would have to be changed beyond recognition for these players to retain interest. You might as well start a new game.
Free to play is the death of EVE Online as we know it.
Absolutely not supported.
|

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4597
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 23:35:00 -
[112] - Quote
Free to Cry There are no goons. The goons' 0.0 dream is over.
"Progodlegend said the goal of N3 is to destroy Goonswarm Federation, but in reality NCdot is in Fountain due to the fact it is virtually the last place there is action." ~NC., Fountain 2013 |

Johan Civire
The Lyran Empire
656
|
Posted - 2013.09.23 14:33:00 -
[113] - Quote
DaRk'TaLoN90 wrote:Sure, Jita will be capped almost 24/7, isn't it already? Honestly though, I don't think that it will get to the point where an entire constellation will be capped out. Maybe the trade routes between all the hubs will be much more crowded and a lot more dangerous... but as always players will adapt to the new conditions. As a bonus I can see new and old players alike using the other trade hubs a lot more, and for good or bad, the other trade hubs will probably become just like Jita.
The game is free to play and no nothing change. Because you need to do something to get it free to play and for those kids out there do something for free to play is not there kind of cup a tea. The want to have free access without farming those plex. Yes than perhaps your scenario is possible but for now its not. Lets hope CCP don't change this. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
11752
|
Posted - 2013.09.23 14:36:00 -
[114] - Quote
Solstice Project's Alt wrote:Dave Stark wrote:i'd be interested to see eve go free to log in, but still require plex to train things. This is actually a remarkable idea ! They'd have more people logged in, (which looks good at the login) but these people barely consume ressources, as they can only ... what. Well obviously ... chat. That's a great feature, because a lot of people just log in to talk with their friends anyway. But we could actually extend that... "Shuttle" flights made by paying players, to move the "free" player around stations. All usual dangers apply. The "free" player could be allowed to trade locally and allowed to create courier contracts. Obviously this means the free player also gains access to his wallet, but he has only a very limited range of things to do with his ISK. That way, the free player would still contribute to the sandbox, but not consume a lot of ressources. ^_^ (this doesn't attract any new players at all, btw ...)
A very large number of veteran players are really only training new skills because, well, you might as well. If people like me could continue playing for free at the expense of training skills, we'd do so in a heartbeat.
1 Kings 12:11
|

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
11754
|
Posted - 2013.09.23 14:49:00 -
[115] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:the joke is that eve is dying like an alliance trying to survive in Curse after losing its sov
ahem
1 Kings 12:11
|

Guttripper
State War Academy Caldari State
331
|
Posted - 2013.09.23 15:45:00 -
[116] - Quote
I've always gone under the pretense that if 15 -20 dollars / pounds / whatever other means of payment is too much a month to tolerate, then shouldn't your priorities be focused elsewhere instead of an online game? |

Freako X
Doom Inc
97
|
Posted - 2013.09.23 19:57:00 -
[117] - Quote
to risk being one of the few pro-F2P players.....
In a market becoming more and more saturated with the F2P model (some do it badly like SWTOR and some do it well like RIFT) it is a competitive disadvantage to not have the appearance of F2P long-term. You can blame tablet and phone games for starting this trend. However, I personally feel it will be needed (on some level) to bring in new blood into the Eve universe long-term.
I don't think a sub-based model will hurt the game over the next couple years. Past that? Yes, I do.
I think the patience required to develop a pilot will hinder most inactive, disinterested players. The ones that do like it, will benefit.
Again, I'd say use the current base-game as the F2P. ADD bonuses to encourage subscriptions.
But then again, I seem to be a minority regarding this topic. I just know you can't fight industry trends long-term and survive. The game needs to adapt. I play with a group of gamers (FPS, MMO, etc) that covers a lot of games. They always gravitate to F2P because they can play more titles. |

Solstice Project's Alt
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
38
|
Posted - 2013.09.23 21:05:00 -
[118] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:A very large number of veteran players are really only training new skills because, well, you might as well. If people like me could continue playing for free at the expense of training skills, we'd do so in a heartbeat. Ah, i see.
That would hurt their wallet too much. |

Solstice Project's Alt
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
38
|
Posted - 2013.09.23 21:07:00 -
[119] - Quote
Freako X wrote:to risk being one of the few pro-F2P players.....
In a market becoming more and more saturated with the F2P model (some do it badly like SWTOR and some do it well like RIFT) it is a competitive disadvantage to not have the appearance of F2P long-term. You can blame tablet and phone games for starting this trend. However, I personally feel it will be needed (on some level) to bring in new blood into the Eve universe long-term.
I don't think a sub-based model will hurt the game over the next couple years. Past that? Yes, I do.
I think the patience required to develop a pilot will hinder most inactive, disinterested players. The ones that do like it, will benefit.
Again, I'd say use the current base-game as the F2P. ADD bonuses to encourage subscriptions.
But then again, I seem to be a minority regarding this topic. I just know you can't fight industry trends long-term and survive. The game needs to adapt. I play with a group of gamers (FPS, MMO, etc) that covers a lot of games. They always gravitate to F2P because they can play more titles. There is definitely a way to make money out of free to play, but in EvE it has to be applied carefully. |

BEPOHNKA
The Scope Gallente Federation
86
|
Posted - 2013.09.23 22:17:00 -
[120] - Quote
At least you know eve online wont be free to play but other games which link in too eve online will be free  |

Abulurd Boniface
The Scope Gallente Federation
44
|
Posted - 2013.09.23 23:17:00 -
[121] - Quote
Out of EVE: safety in all but 1.0 space [we really have to allow the newbies to get their space legs]
Into EVE: Barsoom, a titan-sized ore hauler for those deep space 0.0 mining operations. Your actual space pi+¦ata. |

Janna Sway
48
|
Posted - 2013.10.06 07:32:00 -
[122] - Quote
i have my origins in F2P MMO's and ended up here in EVE because it was not F2P and I happily paid the monthly fees. I have experienced the great weaknesses of F2P games. F2P games are doomed to die out sooner or later. Eve is 10 years old because it is not F2P. I promise you pro-F2P guys, you all do not want F2P, you just do not know and understand it yet. Furthermore, 15$ a month is nothing to discuss about. |

Rumtin
Imperium Technologies Get Off My Lawn
34
|
Posted - 2013.10.06 07:50:00 -
[123] - Quote
Just give it time, EA drop outs / rejects will drive the microbadactions motive through until EvE is a F2P & P2W heep of s***. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 :: [one page] |