Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

grrlet
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
10
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 00:36:00 -
[1] - Quote
I don't think we're allowed to post KMs, so please check out eve kill. The Bhaalgorn in the top left (Most expensive kills).
Noob victim in a veteran pirate ship failing to win against a veteran player in a newbie ship.
PS: Before you point out Concords participation, please note that they only account for 15% of the damage. 15b isk did not prevent fail 2 win noobie from making an uber fail mistake. |

Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
928
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 00:56:00 -
[2] - Quote
650+DPS ship is not really a noob ship, and the character sit on it is not really 900K SP worth plus, high sec mechanics greatly help this kind of silliness happening.
I'm quite sure that so awesome high sec grieffer veteran runs to null sec doing his favorite pass time will get nothing but shuttles, ibis and other noobships cyno alts, a lazy miner or ratting bot eventually, and I really say eventually.
This is exactly the kind of KM and KB that makes me laugh. *removed inappropriate ASCII art signature* - CCP Eterne |

baltec1
Bat Country
7192
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 01:07:00 -
[3] - Quote
Good god
[Bhaalgorn, Quan HonorTheCall's Bhaalgorn] F-90 Positional Signal Amplifier 'Natura' Warp Core Stabilizer I 'Natura' Warp Core Stabilizer I 'Natura' Warp Core Stabilizer I 'Natura' Warp Core Stabilizer I Chelm's Modified Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane
Tobias' Modified X-Large Shield Booster Gist X-Type 100MN Microwarpdrive True Sansha Stasis Webifier Cormack's Modified Sensor Booster 'Investor' Tracking Disruptor I
'Ballista' Tachyon Beam Laser I,True Sanshas Microwave L 'Ballista' Tachyon Beam Laser I,True Sanshas Microwave L Selynne's Modified Dual Heavy Beam Laser,True Sanshas Microwave L Selynne's Modified Dual Heavy Beam Laser,True Sanshas Microwave L Draclira's Modified Large EMP Smartbomb
[empty rig slot] |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
364
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 01:11:00 -
[4] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Good god
[Bhaalgorn, Quan HonorTheCall's Bhaalgorn] F-90 Positional Signal Amplifier 'Natura' Warp Core Stabilizer I 'Natura' Warp Core Stabilizer I 'Natura' Warp Core Stabilizer I 'Natura' Warp Core Stabilizer I Chelm's Modified Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane
Tobias' Modified X-Large Shield Booster Gist X-Type 100MN Microwarpdrive True Sansha Stasis Webifier Cormack's Modified Sensor Booster 'Investor' Tracking Disruptor I
'Ballista' Tachyon Beam Laser I,True Sanshas Microwave L 'Ballista' Tachyon Beam Laser I,True Sanshas Microwave L Selynne's Modified Dual Heavy Beam Laser,True Sanshas Microwave L Selynne's Modified Dual Heavy Beam Laser,True Sanshas Microwave L Draclira's Modified Large EMP Smartbomb
[empty rig slot]
What has been seen... cannot be unseen.
Seriously, that just hurts to look at. Somebody send the owner of this... thing... to RvB so he can learn how to fit a ship. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |

FlamesOfHeaven
Phantom Fenix
51
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 01:11:00 -
[5] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Good god
[Bhaalgorn, Quan HonorTheCall's Bhaalgorn] F-90 Positional Signal Amplifier 'Natura' Warp Core Stabilizer I 'Natura' Warp Core Stabilizer I 'Natura' Warp Core Stabilizer I 'Natura' Warp Core Stabilizer I Chelm's Modified Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane
Tobias' Modified X-Large Shield Booster Gist X-Type 100MN Microwarpdrive True Sansha Stasis Webifier Cormack's Modified Sensor Booster 'Investor' Tracking Disruptor I
'Ballista' Tachyon Beam Laser I,True Sanshas Microwave L 'Ballista' Tachyon Beam Laser I,True Sanshas Microwave L Selynne's Modified Dual Heavy Beam Laser,True Sanshas Microwave L Selynne's Modified Dual Heavy Beam Laser,True Sanshas Microwave L Draclira's Modified Large EMP Smartbomb
[empty rig slot]
I cried when I saw that fit. That Bhaalgorn is at a better place now.  |

Thar Saal
Sorry About Your Face Catastrophic Uprising
48
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 01:17:00 -
[6] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Good god
[Bhaalgorn, Quan HonorTheCall's Bhaalgorn] F-90 Positional Signal Amplifier 'Natura' Warp Core Stabilizer I 'Natura' Warp Core Stabilizer I 'Natura' Warp Core Stabilizer I 'Natura' Warp Core Stabilizer I Chelm's Modified Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane
Tobias' Modified X-Large Shield Booster Gist X-Type 100MN Microwarpdrive True Sansha Stasis Webifier Cormack's Modified Sensor Booster 'Investor' Tracking Disruptor I
'Ballista' Tachyon Beam Laser I,True Sanshas Microwave L 'Ballista' Tachyon Beam Laser I,True Sanshas Microwave L Selynne's Modified Dual Heavy Beam Laser,True Sanshas Microwave L Selynne's Modified Dual Heavy Beam Laser,True Sanshas Microwave L Draclira's Modified Large EMP Smartbomb
[empty rig slot]
Confused whether to shoot at that ship, or chant "THE POWER OF CHRIST COMPELS YOU" will liberally applying holy water
|

Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
928
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 01:19:00 -
[7] - Quote
FlamesOfHeaven wrote:That Bhaalgorn is at a better place now. 
Indeed 
*removed inappropriate ASCII art signature* - CCP Eterne |

Freakdevil
Aliastra Gallente Federation
21
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 01:21:00 -
[8] - Quote
somebody will be needing more plexes soon ...quick raise the price  |

Spurty
902
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 01:24:00 -
[9] - Quote
Loved the comments on that kill lol
Priceless
--- GÇ£If you think this Universe is bad, you should see some of the others.GÇ¥ GÇò Philip K. **** |

grrlet
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
10
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 02:53:00 -
[10] - Quote
Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote:650+DPS ship is not really a noob ship.....
The lack of requirements needed to fly a gnosis make it a newbie ship. |
|

ShahFluffers
Ice Fire Warriors Late Night Alliance
2831
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 03:12:00 -
[11] - Quote
FlamesOfHeaven wrote:baltec1 wrote:Good god
[Bhaalgorn, Quan HonorTheCall's Bhaalgorn] F-90 Positional Signal Amplifier 'Natura' Warp Core Stabilizer I 'Natura' Warp Core Stabilizer I 'Natura' Warp Core Stabilizer I 'Natura' Warp Core Stabilizer I Chelm's Modified Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane
Tobias' Modified X-Large Shield Booster Gist X-Type 100MN Microwarpdrive True Sansha Stasis Webifier Cormack's Modified Sensor Booster 'Investor' Tracking Disruptor I
'Ballista' Tachyon Beam Laser I,True Sanshas Microwave L 'Ballista' Tachyon Beam Laser I,True Sanshas Microwave L Selynne's Modified Dual Heavy Beam Laser,True Sanshas Microwave L Selynne's Modified Dual Heavy Beam Laser,True Sanshas Microwave L Draclira's Modified Large EMP Smartbomb
[empty rig slot] I cried when I saw that fit. That Bhaalgorn is at a better place now.  Yeah... the same place that 4 others like it share. The guy has a thing for fail-pimping Bhaalgorns and losing it to dumb situations.  Change isn't bad, but it isn't always good. Sometimes, the oldest and most simple of things can be the most elegant and effective. |

Wyrm Drake
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
16
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 04:42:00 -
[12] - Quote
Regardless. One incident does not disprove anything. PLEX is P2W in the right hands. |

Riot Girl
Thundercats The Initiative.
1274
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 04:44:00 -
[13] - Quote
Just wait until his mother sees her credit card bill. Oh god. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
365
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 04:46:00 -
[14] - Quote
Wyrm Drake wrote:Regardless. One incident does not disprove anything. PLEX is P2W in the right hands.
If you need to add a qualifier to the statement, then it's not P2W at all.
P2W means Pay to Win. He paid, but he couldn't win. Thus it isn't the overwhelming statistical advantage suggested by the very term you are suggesting. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |

Wrayeth
Inexorable Retribution
95
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 05:27:00 -
[15] - Quote
Thar Saal wrote:
Confused whether to shoot at that ship, or chant "THE POWER OF CHRIST COMPELS YOU" will liberally applying holy water
I would be tempted to apply Damnation to the ship and Absolution to the pod. 
Actually, upon more mature consideration, I'd apply Damnation to the pod as well.  |

Destination SkillQueue
Are We There Yet
5402
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 05:53:00 -
[16] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Wyrm Drake wrote:Regardless. One incident does not disprove anything. PLEX is P2W in the right hands. If you need to add a qualifier to the statement, then it's not P2W at all. P2W means Pay to Win. He paid, but he couldn't win. Thus it isn't the overwhelming statistical advantage suggested by the very term you are suggesting. It might not be P2W, but your reasoning for that doesn't make any sense in this case. What he is trying to say is, that this is anecdotal evidence and therefore doesn't really matter. Doing otherwise would be like saying an OP ship doesn't need any rebalancing, because some idiot fail fitted one and lost it to a battle badger. It's a cherry picked example, that is statistically insignificant and doesn't represent typical cases, so it doesn't prove anything one way or another. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
365
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 05:56:00 -
[17] - Quote
Destination SkillQueue wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Wyrm Drake wrote:Regardless. One incident does not disprove anything. PLEX is P2W in the right hands. If you need to add a qualifier to the statement, then it's not P2W at all. P2W means Pay to Win. He paid, but he couldn't win. Thus it isn't the overwhelming statistical advantage suggested by the very term you are suggesting. It might not be P2W, but your reasoning for that doesn't make any sense in this case. What he is trying to say is, that this is anecdotal evidence and therefore doesn't really matter. Doing otherwise would be like saying an OP ship doesn't need any rebalancing, because some idiot fail fitted one and lost it to a battle badger. It's a cherry picked example, that is statistically insignificant and doesn't represent typical cases, so it doesn't prove anything one way or another.
I disagree. Pay to Win games, and I have attempted to play many of them over the years, are games in which player skill takes a serious back-burner to payer skill. If you have the Mega Armor of Awesomeness and the other guy does not, then they go poof. If both players do, then and only then does it come down to player skill.
EVE is not like this. All the isk in the world won't allow you bludgeon someone into submission if you suck at this game. That's why it's not Pay to Win. Because if you pay, there's no guarantee at all that you will win. In fact it tends to just make you a better target. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
166
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 06:01:00 -
[18] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Wyrm Drake wrote:Regardless. One incident does not disprove anything. PLEX is P2W in the right hands. If you need to add a qualifier to the statement, then it's not P2W at all. P2W means Pay to Win. He paid, but he couldn't win. Thus it isn't the overwhelming statistical advantage suggested by the very term you are suggesting. Pay to Win doesnt mean a blind ******** Bonobo (likely this is some sort of BRT experiment) can play EvE well even when paying since only humans should play EvE. |

FlamesOfHeaven
Phantom Fenix
52
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 06:03:00 -
[19] - Quote
Dont even know why people are crying over such thing (P2W). First world problems I guess. |

Riot Girl
Thundercats The Initiative.
1275
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 06:03:00 -
[20] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:All the isk in the world won't allow you bludgeon someone into submission if you suck at this game. It allows you to pay other people to do it for you though.
Oh god. |
|

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
365
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 06:04:00 -
[21] - Quote
Quote:Pay to Win doesnt mean a blind ******** Bonobo (likely this is some sort of BRT experiment) can play EvE well even when paying since only humans should play EvE.
I'm curious as to where the Bonobo got ahold of a credit card? And does it have people clothes on, or is it just naked? The clothes make the man, as they say.
Quote:It allows you to pay other people to do it for you though.
I'm going to have to go semantics on this one. That's not paying to win, insomuch as it is the aggrieved party paying for the satisfaction of ensuring that someone else loses. A small difference, but still important. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |

Lipbite
Express Hauler
702
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 06:10:00 -
[22] - Quote
That kill only proves PLEX (or RMT or just huge amount ISK received from friend or alt) cannot help handicapped person.
For PLEX you can buy OGB and carrier pilots, ships, assign fighters to your main, turn on skirmish and siege boosters - voila! - you are much more capable than few hours ago. |

Daisai
The Riot Formation Unclaimed.
100
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 06:17:00 -
[23] - Quote
Wyrm Drake wrote:Regardless. One incident does not disprove anything. PLEX is P2W in the right hands.
Pay to win would only be pay to win if you cant get the modules without paying money. No idea how you got the impression that eve has a pay to win. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
365
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 06:20:00 -
[24] - Quote
Daisai wrote:Wyrm Drake wrote:Regardless. One incident does not disprove anything. PLEX is P2W in the right hands. Pay to win would only be pay to win if you cant get the modules without paying money. No idea how you got the impression that eve has a pay to win.
It's the FoTM whine. That and freighters getting ganked, which is apparently a new phenomenon.  Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
167
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 06:26:00 -
[25] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Quote:Pay to Win doesnt mean a blind ******** Bonobo (likely this is some sort of BRT experiment) can play EvE well even when paying since only humans should play EvE. I'm curious as to where the Bonobo got ahold of a credit card? And does it have people clothes on, or is it just naked? The clothes make the man, as they say. Quote:It allows you to pay other people to do it for you though. I'm going to have to go semantics on this one. That's not paying to win, insomuch as it is the aggrieved party paying for the satisfaction of ensuring that someone else loses. A small difference, but still important. Obviously its handler at MIT. Probably took the poor thing weeks of electroshock (wrong slot) / bananna (right slot) training to fit those ships too.
Likely shiny silver spacesuit. They like those. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
366
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 06:30:00 -
[26] - Quote
Quote:Obviously its handler at MIT. Probably took the poor thing weeks of electroshock (wrong slot) / bananna (right slot) training to fit those ships too.
Likely shiny silver spacesuit. They like those.
Well, if it has people clothes on, then it's still more of a player than half the ice miners I've ever met. Ever try to get a conversation started in an ice mining hub? It's like talking to the TV while watching Springer, and even less interactive.
I would imagine that they train said Bonobo to use corp fits, it's probably faster. Although I bet that getting it to set lowball buy orders for T2 guns and faction ammo was a pain in the ass. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |

Snow Axe
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1344
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 06:34:00 -
[27] - Quote
Lipbite wrote:For PLEX you can buy OGB and carrier pilots, ships, assign fighters to your main, turn on skirmish and siege boosters - voila! - you are much more capable than few hours ago.
Those would only make you far more capable of sitting in a wider variety of hulls. It won't amount to anything more than hilarious killmails if you don't know how to fit or fly them, and that's the kind of thing you can't buy. "Look any reason why you need to talk like that? I have now reported you. I dont need to listen to your bad tone. If you cant have a grown up conversation then leave the thread[" |

Jorden Ishonen
Kinetic Technologies
3
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 06:47:00 -
[28] - Quote
Snow Axe wrote:Lipbite wrote:For PLEX you can buy OGB and carrier pilots, ships, assign fighters to your main, turn on skirmish and siege boosters - voila! - you are much more capable than few hours ago. Those would only make you far more capable of sitting in a wider variety of hulls. It won't amount to anything more than hilarious killmails if you don't know how to fit or fly them, and that's the kind of thing you can't buy.
Snow Axe, I think having a sig like yours without a link to the quote is punishable by law in Texas. |

Liafcipe9000
Smeghead Empire
7365
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 07:26:00 -
[29] - Quote
Wyrm Drake wrote:PLEX is P2W http://memecrunch.com/meme/MDBN/third-party-facepalm/image.png You may gain the knowledge, but you will lose your belief, with all its mystery and comfort. If there was proof, absolute and certain, there is an afterlife, why not quit this life, and be done with it? Ponder about these things all your life, and you're a philosopher. Compress these ponderings into a couple of pages, and you'll go mad. |

Sex Slave Girl
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
95
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 08:59:00 -
[30] - Quote
Uh, this could also be staged by the guy that killed it. Some people have to much isk, reached endgame eve and are bored. What's left to do? Yes, make funny killmails. |
|

baltec1
Bat Country
7194
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 09:04:00 -
[31] - Quote
Sex Slave Girl wrote:Uh, this could also be staged by the guy that killed it. Some people have to much isk, reached endgame eve and are bored. What's left to do? Yes, make funny killmails.
No its just a terrible pilot. |

Endeva
Red Dragon Crime Syndicate
2
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 09:46:00 -
[32] - Quote
Sex Slave Girl wrote:Uh, this could also be staged by the guy that killed it. Some people have to much isk, reached endgame eve and are bored. What's left to do? Yes, make funny killmails.
so if i kill him the third time then it would totally prove your theory, correct? he left fw yesterday, but since he got concorded due to shooting at my alts, i believe there is a good chance of another epic km  |

Liafcipe9000
Smeghead Empire
7408
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 09:47:00 -
[33] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Sex Slave Girl wrote:Uh, this could also be staged by the guy that killed it. Some people have to much isk, reached endgame eve and are bored. What's left to do? Yes, make funny killmails. No its just a terrible pilot. this
now bend over. You may gain the knowledge, but you will lose your belief, with all its mystery and comfort. If there was proof, absolute and certain, there is an afterlife, why not quit this life, and be done with it? Ponder about these things all your life, and you're a philosopher. Compress these ponderings into a couple of pages, and you'll go mad. |

Six Six Six
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
170
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 10:08:00 -
[34] - Quote
There's always going to be a disagreement between people regarding PLEX being P2W or not. Just depends on how you view it.
Buying PLEX from CCP then selling in-game for isk is seen by some as a form of P2W. But then you could argue that multiple accounts are also P2W. I don't see much difference between PLEX and multiple accounts they give different benefits but I don't think one is worse than the other. I don't see a problem with either where EVE is concerned.
Neither PLEX or multiple accounts are P2W in the sense of buying super weapons from an in-game shop which can't be obtained in any other manner. This is the way a lot of people view P2W.
My view is PLEX are a form of P2W and so are multiple accounts. I don't see any problem in using either though in EVE as EVE is more a universe in chaos and a bit more chaos isn't going to matter. I've purchased PLEX in the past and would purchase them again if I felt I had a requirement for them, although I no longer use multiple accounts but that was my choice. |

Mr Kidd
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
1251
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 10:09:00 -
[35] - Quote
grrlet wrote:I don't think we're allowed to post KMs, so please check out eve kill. The Bhaalgorn in the top left (Most expensive kills).
Noob victim in a veteran pirate ship failing to win against a veteran player in a newbie ship.
PS: Before you point out Concords participation, please note that they only account for 15% of the damage. 15b isk did not prevent fail 2 win noobie from making an uber fail mistake.
I've really no idea that this has to do with plex or what plex has to do with P2W.
Plex doesn't give you access to golden ammo.
Just to reiterate, I'm supporting and trolling you at the same time. HTFU!...for the children! |

Smohq Anmirorz
State War Academy Caldari State
97
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 11:48:00 -
[36] - Quote
Six Six Six wrote:There's always going to be a disagreement between people regarding PLEX being P2W or not. Just depends on how you view it.
Buying PLEX from CCP then selling in-game for isk is seen by some as a form of P2W. But then you could argue that multiple accounts are also P2W. I don't see much difference between PLEX and multiple accounts they give different benefits but I don't think one is worse than the other. I don't see a problem with either where EVE is concerned.
Neither PLEX or multiple accounts are P2W in the sense of buying super weapons from an in-game shop which can't be obtained in any other manner. This is the way a lot of people view P2W.
My view is PLEX are a form of P2W and so are multiple accounts. I don't see any problem in using either though in EVE as EVE is more a universe in chaos and a bit more chaos isn't going to matter. I've purchased PLEX in the past and would purchase them again if I felt I had a requirement for them, although I no longer use multiple accounts but that was my choice.
Just because something gives benefits doesn't make it a win. One could extend the logic that "paying for PLEX is p2w" to "paying for a subscription is p2w". Those paying for a monthly subscription don't have to buy a PLEX to keep playing, giving them several hundred million ISK more per month than those who buy PLEX with ISK. Does this make paying for a regular subscription p2w? |

Forum Clone 77777
State War Academy Caldari State
119
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 11:55:00 -
[37] - Quote
When did people start thinking plex is pay to win? Its like.. The dumbest **** Ive ever heard.. |

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
362
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 11:58:00 -
[38] - Quote
grrlet wrote:I don't think we're allowed to post KMs, so please check out eve kill. The Bhaalgorn in the top left (Most expensive kills).
Noob victim in a veteran pirate ship failing to win against a veteran player in a newbie ship.
PS: Before you point out Concords participation, please note that they only account for 15% of the damage. 15b isk did not prevent fail 2 win noobie from making an uber fail mistake.
And my main's drone killed the attacker and scored a kill.
Talking about the most unsatisfying kill ever (why I don't play hunters in WoW. If I don't kill it it's not satisfying). In arena if my team wins, fine. But if I deliver the final puny blow as a healer with but 10k mana left...wow...that's something to remember (and a way to **** off the other player...killed by a healer). "In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ~George Orwell
|

Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1992
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 11:58:00 -
[39] - Quote
PLEX is better described as Pay To Suck. Titans were never meant to be "cost effective", its a huge ****.-á- CCP Oveur, 2006
~If you want a picture of the future of WiS, imagine a spaceship, stamping on an avatar's face. Forever. |

Kashmyta
Predominant Dynamics
53
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 12:00:00 -
[40] - Quote
This like the 4th fit office bhal he has lost in as many weeks each one was only partially fit
/ |
|

Six Six Six
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
170
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 12:19:00 -
[41] - Quote
Smohq Anmirorz wrote:Six Six Six wrote:There's always going to be a disagreement between people regarding PLEX being P2W or not. Just depends on how you view it.
Buying PLEX from CCP then selling in-game for isk is seen by some as a form of P2W. But then you could argue that multiple accounts are also P2W. I don't see much difference between PLEX and multiple accounts they give different benefits but I don't think one is worse than the other. I don't see a problem with either where EVE is concerned.
Neither PLEX or multiple accounts are P2W in the sense of buying super weapons from an in-game shop which can't be obtained in any other manner. This is the way a lot of people view P2W.
My view is PLEX are a form of P2W and so are multiple accounts. I don't see any problem in using either though in EVE as EVE is more a universe in chaos and a bit more chaos isn't going to matter. I've purchased PLEX in the past and would purchase them again if I felt I had a requirement for them, although I no longer use multiple accounts but that was my choice. Just because something gives benefits doesn't make it a win. One could extend the logic that "paying for PLEX is p2w" to "paying for a subscription is p2w". Those paying for a monthly subscription don't have to buy a PLEX to keep playing, giving them several hundred million ISK more per month than those who buy PLEX with ISK. Does this make paying for a regular subscription p2w?
Paying for a 1 subscription is not P2W it's Pay 2 Play. Having more than one can be seen as a form of P2W as not everyone will be able to have multiple accounts, so some people will have a large paid for advantage over others. Same with PLEX for isk not everyone can afford to pay for PLEX to sell on the in-game market so that will also gain an advantage to those that can.
There are other factors that effect game play like how long someone can spend playing the game, how good their computer system is and how good their service provider is when connecting to EVE. None of which can be regulated in-game. Which is part of why I don't see multiple accounts or PLEX as a problem. Plus I like EVE unbalanced, if everything was fair it would be boring. The world is not fair so I see no problem with EVE not being fair.
Let me ask you a question. I'f everyone purchased over powered ships from an in-game shop would that be P2W? It's all a matter of perspective.
|

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
362
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 12:30:00 -
[42] - Quote
Six Six Six wrote:Which is part of why I don't see multiple accounts or PLEX as a problem. Plus I like EVE unbalanced, if everything was fair it would be boring. The world is not fair so I see no problem with EVE not being fair.
Was agreeing with your post until this point.
And that's because an unfair game is like an unfair RL pro sport.
Shoeless Joe got expelled. And do you know why baseball had to do it? Bad for business. Kids play it and sets the wrong example of good sportsmanship. You need that so the game doesn't become a thug fest, and people leave because despite the drama, it's not what they pay for to see. They want to see their heroes play a damn good game.
The same in video games. In WoW I marvel at Swifty running around BGs and just blowing them up. He loves his toon and it shows. I don't even play a warrior, but it's fun seeing someone enjoy his class and having a good time. Even better when Ghostcrawler shows up on his mage and stands there slackjawed watching Swifty showing how the game should be played.
EvE needs it's own heroes. With players enjoying the view. But if the game is totally unfair, the cynicism rears it's ugly head, and there's no more heroes to enjoy. "In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ~George Orwell
|

Six Six Six
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
170
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 12:33:00 -
[43] - Quote
Ace Uoweme wrote:Six Six Six wrote:Which is part of why I don't see multiple accounts or PLEX as a problem. Plus I like EVE unbalanced, if everything was fair it would be boring. The world is not fair so I see no problem with EVE not being fair. Was agreeing with your post until this point.
That's just my personal preference, I tend to like being with the underdogs. Never understood why people leave to join the winning side. |

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
948
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 12:39:00 -
[44] - Quote
Wyrm Drake wrote:Regardless. One incident does not disprove anything. PLEX is P2W in the right hands.
You'd have a point if you could do PLEX for SP, until then you are wrong. This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. |

Six Six Six
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
171
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 12:45:00 -
[45] - Quote
La Nariz wrote:Wyrm Drake wrote:Regardless. One incident does not disprove anything. PLEX is P2W in the right hands. You'd have a point if you could do PLEX for SP, until then you are wrong.
PLEX is already for SP although it only effects a character starting out at least for now.
Buy PLEX from CCP, sell on the market for isk, train cybernetics to level 4, fit +4 implants resulting in faster training times than what you would have had normally. Plus all the books you can just buy without waiting to be able to afford them. |

Caitlyn Tufy
Bene Gesserit ChapterHouse Sanctuary Pact
348
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 12:54:00 -
[46] - Quote
La Nariz wrote:Wyrm Drake wrote:Regardless. One incident does not disprove anything. PLEX is P2W in the right hands. You'd have a point if you could do PLEX for SP, until then you are wrong.
Technically, that's already possible if you buy a pilot with required skills. However, chances are the player will still lose a multibillion perfectly trained pirate ship to a well played pilot in a Stabber or something.
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Daisai wrote:Wyrm Drake wrote:Regardless. One incident does not disprove anything. PLEX is P2W in the right hands. Pay to win would only be pay to win if you cant get the modules without paying money. No idea how you got the impression that eve has a pay to win. It's the FoTM whine. That and freighters getting ganked, which is apparently a new phenomenon. 
So whining about permanent cloaks is last year? :p |

March rabbit
epTa Team Inc.
723
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 13:01:00 -
[47] - Quote
grrlet wrote:15b isk did not prevent fail 2 win noobie from making an uber fail mistake. pay to win usually mean: you pay to increase your chance to win. It's not that if you pay you win without options.....
another example: take 2 n00bs with equal skills and experience. First one plays "without PLEX" and uses "normal" ship. Second one plays with PLEX and uses "uber pirate ship". Keeping aside stupid mistakes second pilot will win in this situation with big chance.
From this point it looks more like "PLEX is pay2win"  |

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
363
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 13:18:00 -
[48] - Quote
March rabbit wrote:grrlet wrote:15b isk did not prevent fail 2 win noobie from making an uber fail mistake. pay to win usually mean: you pay to increase your chance to win. It's not that if you pay you win without options..... another example: take 2 n00bs with equal skills and experience. First one plays "without PLEX" and uses "normal" ship. Second one plays with PLEX and uses "uber pirate ship". Keeping aside stupid mistakes second pilot will win in this situation with big chance. From this point it looks more like "PLEX is pay2win" 
Right.
Once PLEX was a means to buy more than game time, it became possible for someone paying more can buy the better ships (and very expensive skill books -- 500 million ISK for Capital Industrial Ships). That's what I use my PLEX for mainly, to buy skill books and BPOs, banking on the future. Because that is how to survive beyond just pewpewpewing.
I treat EvE like I treat a F2P game, because it's just like so many of them. Last F2P game I played, it too had those expensive skill books to pay for (and it used to be the only way to get them was in the cash shop. Still have to buy the speciality books to unlock extra skills). "In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ~George Orwell
|

Beekeeper Bob
Beekeepers Anonymous
683
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 16:23:00 -
[49] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Wyrm Drake wrote:Regardless. One incident does not disprove anything. PLEX is P2W in the right hands. If you need to add a qualifier to the statement, then it's not P2W at all. P2W means Pay to Win. He paid, but he couldn't win. Thus it isn't the overwhelming statistical advantage suggested by the very term you are suggesting.
I too like to show a single example of extreme idiocy, and use it as proof....
I too am excited about trading playability for more lag and shiny pictures.....:( Petition for a Minimum bounty of 10 mil. Prevent useless bounties!
|

Sebastian N Cain
Aliastra Gallente Federation
190
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 18:32:00 -
[50] - Quote
Beekeeper Bob wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Wyrm Drake wrote:Regardless. One incident does not disprove anything. PLEX is P2W in the right hands. If you need to add a qualifier to the statement, then it's not P2W at all. P2W means Pay to Win. He paid, but he couldn't win. Thus it isn't the overwhelming statistical advantage suggested by the very term you are suggesting. I too like to show a single example of extreme idiocy, and use it as proof.... Well, the thing is: This idiocy is the norm if you are untrained. Fitting, flying and tactics beyond orbit+F1 are crucial to win. And can only be learned the hard way.
PLEX does only spare you the grind to make money, so saving time is all it gives you. "You either need less science fiction or more medication."
"Or less medication and more ammo!" |
|

Daimon Kaiera
Kraken.
370
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 18:36:00 -
[51] - Quote
I use PLEX for Aurum. I don't know what any of you people are talking about. .... . .-.. .--. / .. / .... .- ...- . / ..-. .- .-.. .-.. . -. / .- -. -.. / .. / -.-. .- -. -. --- - / --. . - / ..- .--. / ... - --- .--. - .... .. ... / ... .. --. -. .- - ..- .-. . / .. -.. . .- / .. ... / -. --- - / ... - --- .-.. . -. / ... - --- .--. |

Aralieus
Shadowbane Syndicate
141
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 18:44:00 -
[52] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Good god
[Bhaalgorn, Quan HonorTheCall's Bhaalgorn] F-90 Positional Signal Amplifier 'Natura' Warp Core Stabilizer I 'Natura' Warp Core Stabilizer I 'Natura' Warp Core Stabilizer I 'Natura' Warp Core Stabilizer I Chelm's Modified Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane
Tobias' Modified X-Large Shield Booster Gist X-Type 100MN Microwarpdrive True Sansha Stasis Webifier Cormack's Modified Sensor Booster 'Investor' Tracking Disruptor I
'Ballista' Tachyon Beam Laser I,True Sanshas Microwave L 'Ballista' Tachyon Beam Laser I,True Sanshas Microwave L Selynne's Modified Dual Heavy Beam Laser,True Sanshas Microwave L Selynne's Modified Dual Heavy Beam Laser,True Sanshas Microwave L Draclira's Modified Large EMP Smartbomb
[empty rig slot]
That poor Bhaal, there will be a memorial service on the 6th in Jita for those that are interested.
Oderint Dum Metuant |

Daharen Caronite
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 23:08:00 -
[53] - Quote
The perspective that it's pay to win is understandable. However, a basic comprehension of the economics involved does bring about the point that it doesn't provide any player with any advantage not earned by the cooperation of in game play.
What I mean by this is that some players couldn't play the game if they couldn't pay for it in game by giving adequate time to grinding out the ISK to buy a PLEX in game. They are substituting their in game time for the subscription fee they would normally pay, which I think few players would argue is unfair.
The players who buy and sell PLEX are doing nothing more then providing the means for other players to play a game they otherwise couldn't, and in fact they have to pay MORE then the subscription costs to provide that benefit. As a further note some players could never play this game for lack of time to do the inherently required ISK grinding, but they aren't inherently bad players when you take into account the way they pilot, fit, and train these players are arguably 'P2W' but the grinding required to make their ships and buy their advantage wasn't skipped it was merely performed by someone willing to do it for the luxury of not having to pay a subscription.
The price of PLEX is part of the market, and is not artificially set, it plays no direct part in EVEs economy, in fact, because its paying for subscriptions and allowing a larger player base its ACTUALLY an ISK sink decreasing inflation in the game by making billions of ISK that was grinded for disappear into the void when a PLEX is consumed for subscription instead of on in game items. Since the PLEX is part of the market if too many players ever try to 'P2W' then they will over-saturate the market with PLEX and the players who need them to play will be willing to pay less ISK for the overabundance allowing players with less internal game means to produce the necessary ISK to also keep playing, always perpetually keeping the price reasonable to the amount of effort expended to keep the economy running, and keep players playing.
From an averaged pure economic perspective there can be no argument , PLEX do not provide an advantage in the economy or in the game... The key word here is 'averaged'. In game however the real disparity is between the players who have BOTH the unlimited free time AND the large wallet to invest both ways, and players who have a life and thus lack the necessary time AND money to stay in game through PLEX. However, aside from these two extremes all that is really done by PLEX existing is giving players with limited time an opportunity to play instead of grind, and players with ample time an opportunity to grind to play where otherwise they couldn't play at all.
The people in the middle with the money to spare for a subscription and the time to spare to make a profit and move forward aren't economically disadvantaged, they are merely disgruntled that these other players game to a financial agreement that frankly could have just as easily been brokered in real life if it wasn't brokered in game by CCP as it was, and nothing could have been done about it if it was done that way, so realistically at least this allows CCP to take advantage of something that will occur rather they, or any player likes it or not. |

Captain Tardbar
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
441
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 23:35:00 -
[54] - Quote
Buying a plex doesn't automatically mean you pay to win.
It can if you do it smartly and have experience to back it up.
If you just undock and lose your ship in 5 minutes its obviously not though. "Entitlement" is a euphemism for "I hate the way you play and it makes me cry like a baby". If you fantasize about being immoral it means you enjoy being immoral deep down. |

Jarod Garamonde
Action Bastards
287
|
Posted - 2013.07.04 23:51:00 -
[55] - Quote
Why in the nine circles of hell would you EVER need 4 warp core stabs? "you can identify eve players by looking at their cars. Since they don't drive what they can't afford to lose."-á --áBienator II |

Six Six Six
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
175
|
Posted - 2013.07.05 00:39:00 -
[56] - Quote
Daharen Caronite wrote:The perspective that it's pay to win is understandable. However, a basic comprehension of the economics involved does bring about the point that it doesn't provide any player with any advantage not earned by the cooperation of in game play.
Wrong, PLEX is originally purchased by money that has nothing to do with game play or cooperation. They are in fact purchasing an in-game object that can be traded for an advantage, namely isk. Doesn't matter where that isk came from the fact is they gain an advantage by using real currency. I've purchased isk myself from CCP I'm under no illusions about the advantages the isk gave me.
Daharen Caronite wrote: What I mean by this is that some players couldn't play the game if they couldn't pay for it in game by giving adequate time to grinding out the ISK to buy a PLEX in game. They are substituting their in game time for the subscription fee they would normally pay, which I think few players would argue is unfair.
The players who buy and sell PLEX are doing nothing more then providing the means for other players to play a game they otherwise couldn't, and in fact they have to pay MORE then the subscription costs to provide that benefit. As a further note some players could never play this game for lack of time to do the inherently required ISK grinding, but they aren't inherently bad players when you take into account the way they pilot, fit, and train these players are arguably 'P2W' but the grinding required to make their ships and buy their advantage wasn't skipped it was merely performed by someone willing to do it for the luxury of not having to pay a subscription..
I'll answer that as part of my summing up at the end.
Daharen Caronite wrote: The price of PLEX is part of the market, and is not artificially set, it plays no direct part in EVEs economy, in fact, because its paying for subscriptions and allowing a larger player base its ACTUALLY an ISK sink decreasing inflation in the game by making billions of ISK that was grinded for disappear into the void when a PLEX is consumed for subscription instead of on in game items. Since the PLEX is part of the market if too many players ever try to 'P2W' then they will over-saturate the market with PLEX and the players who need them to play will be willing to pay less ISK for the overabundance allowing players with less internal game means to produce the necessary ISK to also keep playing, always perpetually keeping the price reasonable to the amount of effort expended to keep the economy running, and keep players playing..
PLEX being used is not an isk sink as you've already given the isk to the person selling the PLEX on the market. PLEX is only an isk sink if it's used in NEX (via aurum) or is destroyed in-game.
The price of PLEX in-game is player controlled via the market. Yes, if too many people buy PLEX and the demand is not there they would have a problem selling them, but I've never known that to be the case and is irrelevant to the argument anyway.
Daharen Caronite wrote: From an averaged pure economic perspective there can be no argument , PLEX do not provide an advantage in the economy or in the game... The key word here is 'averaged'. In game however the real disparity is between the players who have BOTH the unlimited free time AND the large wallet to invest both ways, and players who have a life and thus lack the necessary time AND money to stay in game through PLEX. However, aside from these two extremes all that is really done by PLEX existing is giving players with limited time an opportunity to play instead of grind, and players with ample time an opportunity to grind to play where otherwise they couldn't play at all. .
Wrong as already discussed with your first paragraph, they do offer an advantage to those buying from CCP.
Daharen Caronite wrote: The people in the middle with the money to spare for a subscription and the time to spare to make a profit and move forward aren't economically disadvantaged, they are merely disgruntled that these other players game to a financial agreement that frankly could have just as easily been brokered in real life if it wasn't brokered in game by CCP as it was, and nothing could have been done about it if it was done that way, so realistically at least this allows CCP to take advantage of something that will occur rather they, or any player likes it or not.
Yeah, It reduces opportunities for RMTers, which is a good thing.
Buying PLEX from CCP is a form of P2W (PLEX being an in-game object) if used to raise isk. The benefits gained are more apparent the newer the player is as it's isk that gives the advantage.
PLEX purchased in-game with isk is not P2W although if used to fund additional accounts you could argue it is.
I don't see any issue serious enough to do away with PLEX or multiple accounts, but they do give advantages but then so do other factors outside of the games control. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |