| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 159 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 43 post(s) |

Soulpirate
State War Academy Caldari State
113
|
Posted - 2012.02.26 09:24:00 -
[3451] - Quote
Taiwanistan wrote:Sorry, i am not paying $15 a month to watch a bunch of dudes lisping in a corner comparing pants and not being able to gank them. I'm sure there's a lot of other players who feel the same way.
So stay in your ship and stfu already.  |

Indahmawar Fazmarai
The I and F Taxation Trust
320
|
Posted - 2012.02.26 10:47:00 -
[3452] - Quote
DeMichael Crimson wrote:As for players doing suicide gank's in high sec and then escaping Concord, that's an exploit which should be reported asap. If it is indeed happening, then CCP needs to fix that problem asap.
High sec gate / station camping is due to broken game mechanics. Basically that's loitering and in any civilized community, those doing that would be questioned by the authorities and then told to vacate the area, if not then they would be issued a fine, then forcibly removed and possibly detained, especially in a high security environment.
As I said earlier, I'm not going to participate in WiS content if my Avatar can be ganked in high security stations, plain and simple. If that's allowed, then it's not high security. If I wanted to play a 'Free for all' FPS PvP game, I definitely wouldn't be playing Eve.
Since my main clone has implants, I'm not going to clone jump just to go check out high security WiS for 15 minutes due to a possible suicide gank on my Avatar and then wait 24 hrs to jump back into my main clone again. I'm sorry but that is unacceptable. Besides that, a high skilled character is going to pay a lot more ISK to upgrade their Medical Clone compared to a low skilled character. That alone opens up the door to having mass amounts of low skilled Avatar Attack Alt's being created.
Those saying they want non-consensual PvP action in WiS high security stations are actually advocating grief play. If allowed they would probably have a Terrorist Avatar fit up a Bomb Vest under it's Jacket and blow up half the station killing 100 Avatars all at the same time.
Sorry, I'm not paying $15 a month subscription fee to have my Avatar open to free ganking if I walk out of my CQ in a high security station. I'm sure there's a lot of other players who feel the same way.
When i think of WiS, I think of it as being grief-free and explicitly opposed to the current free-for-all griefing. The worst that can happen to you in a station is to be scammed and that completely must stay the same if WiS is implemented. EVE residents: 5% Wormholes; 8% Lowsec; 20% Nullsec; 67% Highsec. CSM 6: 100% non-Highsec residents.
EVE demographics vs CSM demographics, nothing to worry about...-á |

Guttripper
State War Academy Caldari State
54
|
Posted - 2012.02.26 11:29:00 -
[3453] - Quote
Re: DeMichael Crimson and Indahmawar Fazmarai
With you two desiring WIS to be completely kill free and a safe haven for all, you two may push players normally not interested in that aspect of the game to ~force~ CCP to parallel the FIS aspect of the game just so they can take pot shots at those targets you two are painting on your backs... |

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Industrial Complex Cosmic Consortium
1027
|
Posted - 2012.02.26 11:37:00 -
[3454] - Quote
Taiwanistan wrote:Sorry, i am not paying $15 a month to watch a bunch of dudes lisping in a corner comparing pants and not being able to gank them. I'm sure there's a lot of other players who feel the same way.
There's a lot more to EVE than watching a bunch of dusted lisping in a corner. There are spaceships to fly and stations to burn and alliances to destroy. You should try some of those activities: you never know just how much fun the flying in space part of EVE Online might be until you try it!
|

Lexmana
Imperial Stout
245
|
Posted - 2012.02.26 11:39:00 -
[3455] - Quote
Guttripper wrote:Re: DeMichael Crimson and Indahmawar Fazmarai
With you two desiring WIS to be completely kill free and a safe haven for all, you two may push players normally not interested in that aspect of the game to ~force~ CCP to parallel the FIS aspect of the game just so they can take pot shots at those targets you two are painting on your backs...
Isn't that what they have desired all the time?? I do hope CCP is smarter than that though or they will kill EVE. |

Indahmawar Fazmarai
The I and F Taxation Trust
320
|
Posted - 2012.02.26 11:58:00 -
[3456] - Quote
Guttripper wrote:Re: DeMichael Crimson and Indahmawar Fazmarai
With you two desiring WIS to be completely kill free and a safe haven for all, you two may push players normally not interested in that aspect of the game to ~force~ CCP to parallel the FIS aspect of the game just so they can take pot shots at those targets you two are painting on your backs...
Oh, yes, we are calling upon us the wrath of tear collectors by asking CCP to keep stations the same they are now even if WiS is delivered. Otherwise griefers would not have the lesser interest to grief people in stations too and face as many retaliation and consequences as they bravely endure in FiS.  EVE residents: 5% Wormholes; 8% Lowsec; 20% Nullsec; 67% Highsec. CSM 6: 100% non-Highsec residents.
EVE demographics vs CSM demographics, nothing to worry about...-á |

DeMichael Crimson
Republic University Minmatar Republic
1257
|
Posted - 2012.02.26 12:27:00 -
[3457] - Quote
Lexmana wrote:Guttripper wrote:Re: DeMichael Crimson and Indahmawar Fazmarai
With you two desiring WIS to be completely kill free and a safe haven for all, you two may push players normally not interested in that aspect of the game to ~force~ CCP to parallel the FIS aspect of the game just so they can take pot shots at those targets you two are painting on your backs... Isn't that what they have desired all the time?? I do hope CCP is smarter than that though or they will kill EVE.
First of all, both of you are completely wrong but nice try at trolling. I was talking about high security WiS and to be fair I never said make it 100% completely safe. I had previously posted a proposal pertaining to WiS high security combat which was immediately attacked. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=821588#post821588
But hey, keep twisting my statements around. The ones that will kill Eve are players like you who advocate non-consensual PvP everywhere at anytime. If CCP does make high security WiS into a 'Free for all' FPS, good luck trying to get me. However there's one thing you can count on, I'll definitely create a team of low skilled Avatar Attack Alt's which will be camping a few different CQ's.
You'll definitely be singing a different tune after your Avatars get hit a few times. |

xxxTRUSTxxx
Galactic Rangers Galactic-Rangers
47
|
Posted - 2012.02.26 12:42:00 -
[3458] - Quote
This thread is becoming a little long in the tooth at this stage.
The bottom line is a good balance between FIS & WIS. the following should be kept in mind.
1: EVE is supposed to be a sandbox, if indeed WIS becomes a safe haven where you can't be attacked then the sandbox is broken. if you really want to play a game where all you do is hoard crap and never use it then perhaps it's time you asked yourself, IS EVE FOR ME ?
2: FIS & WIS should be as balanced as possible, keeping in mind that this is very very hard to do. CCP should do as they have done recently, keep the community up to date as much as possible in regards to future changes, CCP also deserve the time needed to make changes work. (expect a **** up or 2 that's life)
3: FIS is indeed a little broken, i live in hope that CCP has made sure that the next expansion which will deal with the war/pvp mechanics will correct as much of this as possible.
4: WIS deserves PVP and PVE, what we don't need is WIS to be a fashion parade (THIS WILL KILL WIS !)
i'm never surprised by the supercarebear attitude of HEY, leave me alone to build my shineys, i don't want to be shot at. but hey, here's your wake up call, THIS IS EVE, PVP is a huge part of this game, you knew this when you joined, almost everyone with the i don't want to be shot or shoot at people attitude are playing the game long enough to know well that this is how EVE is. you are out numbered ! CCP are never going to create a second universe for you guys to hang out in with total peace and no worry of being shot at while you WIS or FIS.
I'll ask you who disagree to STOP trying to split EVE into 2 different games.
WIS will be a brilliant addition to the game. but it must fit into the same universe that is EVE. a place where you are never safe, safe is an illusion, safe is not a given, this is why most of us play EVE, it is not for the faint hearted. |

Guttripper
State War Academy Caldari State
54
|
Posted - 2012.02.26 12:45:00 -
[3459] - Quote
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:Oh, yes, we are calling upon us the wrath of tear collectors by asking CCP to keep stations the same they are now even if WiS is delivered. Otherwise griefers would not have the lesser interest to grief people in stations too and face as many retaliation and consequences as they bravely endure in FiS. 
So what you are asking for is a space version of the Sims?
Why wouldn't CCP release whole categories of new skills that revolve around station life? Defensive skills that boost your personal mental and physical body? Offensive skills that boost your combat effectiveness? Bodyguard skills similar to Drones that can protect you from sudden attacks? Marketing and Trading skills that allow players to build those establishments? Social skills for the mere chance to interact with infamous NPC characters in the lore history?
Then there are potentially whole avenues for manufacturing skills involving fashion design with casual, combat, and every other type of dress wear as an occasion will see fit. Or cybernetic enhancements for both defensive and offensive boosts similar to what was found in the Shadowrun universe? Personal side arms could be another whole manufacturing route too. Then the more exotic "modules" to add to your body like personal force fields as but an example.
To be completely risk aversion while being a squishy flesh form in a station goes against the core of Eve. Yes, high security stations should be safer that low or even null security "public" stations - have a similar Concord presence parallel to FIS. But to be afraid to loose _anything_ once out of the pod?
You're playing the wrong game in my humble opinion. |

xxxTRUSTxxx
Galactic Rangers Galactic-Rangers
47
|
Posted - 2012.02.26 12:48:00 -
[3460] - Quote
Guttripper wrote:Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:Oh, yes, we are calling upon us the wrath of tear collectors by asking CCP to keep stations the same they are now even if WiS is delivered. Otherwise griefers would not have the lesser interest to grief people in stations too and face as many retaliation and consequences as they bravely endure in FiS.  So what you are asking for is a space version of the Sims? Why wouldn't CCP release whole categories of new skills that revolve around station life? Defensive skills that boost your personal mental and physical body? Offensive skills that boost your combat effectiveness? Bodyguard skills similar to Drones that can protect you from sudden attacks? Marketing and Trading skills that allow players to build those establishments? Social skills for the mere chance to interact with infamous NPC characters in the lore history? Then there are potentially whole avenues for manufacturing skills involving fashion design with casual, combat, and every other type of dress wear as an occasion will see fit. Or cybernetic enhancements for both defensive and offensive boosts similar to what was found in the Shadowrun universe? Personal side arms could be another whole manufacturing route too. Then the more exotic "modules" to add to your body like personal force fields as but an example. To be completely risk aversion while being a squishy flesh form in a station goes against the core of Eve. Yes, high security stations should be safer that low or even null security "public" stations - have a similar Concord presence parallel to FIS. But to be afraid to loose _anything_ once out of the pod? You're playing the wrong game in my humble opinion.
well said +1 |

Deviana Sevidon
Jades Falcon Guards
291
|
Posted - 2012.02.26 13:13:00 -
[3461] - Quote
Because if we have a concord system in a high sec station then some idiots would at some point try to use weapons to suicide people.
From that point it is not far to imagine some idiots , well probably a few goons, firing AoE weapons in a station environment while wearing a self crafted towel on their head and screaming something about god.
From this point it could get CCP into legal trouble, at the very least the teen-rating for EVE would be removed and at worst it could result in a ban in several countries. I would not want to go down that route. |

Guttripper
State War Academy Caldari State
54
|
Posted - 2012.02.26 13:15:00 -
[3462] - Quote
DeMichael Crimson wrote:First of all, both of you are completely wrong but nice try at trolling. I was talking about high security WiS and to be fair I never said make it 100% completely safe.
And then previously you wrote (with minor snipping):
DeMichael Crimson wrote:As I said earlier, I'm not going to participate in WiS content if my Avatar can be ganked in high security stations, plain and simple. If that's allowed, then it's not high security.
Since my main clone has implants, I'm not going to clone jump just to go check out high security WiS for 15 minutes due to a possible suicide gank on my Avatar and then wait 24 hrs to jump back into my main clone again.
Those saying they want non-consensual PvP action in WiS high security stations are actually advocating grief play.
Sorry, I'm not paying $15 a month subscription fee to have my Avatar open to free ganking if I walk out of my CQ in a high security station. I'm sure there's a lot of other players who feel the same way.
So you state earlier that getting ganked in high security stations is not high security, but then call me a troll and state you never said to have it 100% completely safe? Are you advocating to have consensual player versus player combat in high security stations? Perhaps CCP should extend this train of thought into FIS too, since I am pretty sure my casual mining girlfriend would not mind worrying about loosing her Hulk in high security space. And "I'm sure there's a lot of other players who feel the same way."
In some backwaters high security Minmatar station.
Standing crisply at DeMichael's docking station, Guttripper begins, "DeMichael you old chap, since you accused me of trolling, we should have a friendly duel, ten paces with flint pistols!" he states, adjusting his collar to his (Nex store bought) Victorian dress suit.
Defying all laws of time and space, DeMichael goes from pod to clothing instantly. "Not today kind sir, for I raided a grand old exploration site and wish to sell my new found goods within my established high security store front." he replies, presenting a manifest of his cargo hold full of modules.
Reviewing the list and nodding in agreement, Guttripper continues, "Oh, good fortunes to you then! Have a good day and fly safe! Cheerio!" as he turns and walks off into the gank-free safe station.
Yep, Eve is dying with or without WIS in any way, shape, or form.  |

Elanor Vega
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
136
|
Posted - 2012.02.26 13:17:00 -
[3463] - Quote
No weapons in WiS. It must be forbidden in WiS by CONCORD and we would be scanned every time we enter public area. IF there must be the way to kill person that would be personal attacks - brake a neck of person or male attack. AND it have to be much more heavy sanctioned then in space. |

Guttripper
State War Academy Caldari State
54
|
Posted - 2012.02.26 13:30:00 -
[3464] - Quote
Elanor Vega wrote:No weapons in WiS. It must be forbidden in WiS by CONCORD and we would be scanned every time we enter public area. IF there must be the way to kill person that would be personal attacks - brake a neck of person or male attack. AND it have to be much more heavy sanctioned then in space.
Meanwhile, CONCORD has no harbored guilty feelings about destroying your suicidal ship, potentially killing hundreds, if not thousands of nameless crew members following a quite safely immortal entity's orders who is then allowed to freely leave the death and destruction behind to continue his or her potential wrath of carnage... |

Indahmawar Fazmarai
The I and F Taxation Trust
320
|
Posted - 2012.02.26 14:56:00 -
[3465] - Quote
Guttripper wrote:Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:Oh, yes, we are calling upon us the wrath of tear collectors by asking CCP to keep stations the same they are now even if WiS is delivered. Otherwise griefers would not have the lesser interest to grief people in stations too and face as many retaliation and consequences as they bravely endure in FiS.  So what you are asking for is a space version of the Sims? Why wouldn't CCP release whole categories of new skills that revolve around station life? Defensive skills that boost your personal mental and physical body? Offensive skills that boost your combat effectiveness? Bodyguard skills similar to Drones that can protect you from sudden attacks? Marketing and Trading skills that allow players to build those establishments? Social skills for the mere chance to interact with infamous NPC characters in the lore history? Then there are potentially whole avenues for manufacturing skills involving fashion design with casual, combat, and every other type of dress wear as an occasion will see fit. Or cybernetic enhancements for both defensive and offensive boosts similar to what was found in the Shadowrun universe? Personal side arms could be another whole manufacturing route too. Then the more exotic "modules" to add to your body like personal force fields as but an example. To be completely risk aversion while being a squishy flesh form in a station goes against the core of Eve. Yes, high security stations should be safer that low or even null security "public" stations - have a similar Concord presence parallel to FIS. But to be afraid to loose _anything_ once out of the pod? You're playing the wrong game in my humble opinion.
Just for your information, stations already are a griefing-free PvP arena. i want them to stay that way even if our avatars walk around like immortal demigods who would absolutely genocide anyone threatening their precious immortal life and would also put a shot into an enemy's clone if they were as much as allowed to. EVE residents: 5% Wormholes; 8% Lowsec; 20% Nullsec; 67% Highsec. CSM 6: 100% non-Highsec residents.
EVE demographics vs CSM demographics, nothing to worry about...-á |

Elanor Vega
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
136
|
Posted - 2012.02.26 16:18:00 -
[3466] - Quote
Guttripper wrote:Elanor Vega wrote:No weapons in WiS. It must be forbidden in WiS by CONCORD and we would be scanned every time we enter public area. IF there must be the way to kill person that would be personal attacks - brake a neck of person or male attack. AND it have to be much more heavy sanctioned then in space. Meanwhile, CONCORD has no harbored guilty feelings about destroying your suicidal ship, potentially killing hundreds, if not thousands of nameless crew members following a quite safely immortal entity's orders who is then allowed to freely leave the death and destruction behind to continue his or her potential wrath of carnage...
so? |

Krixtal Icefluxor
Bison - Ammatar Thunder Thundering Herd
368
|
Posted - 2012.02.26 16:27:00 -
[3467] - Quote
I'll be NOT worrying about this at all till I see Skillbooks for Karate, Knives and Handguns.
"Grenade Skill allows 1000m greater tossing distance per level." OMG He Spent His Free-áAURUM ! God is simply-áthe very extraordinary power of the Universe to organize Itself as percieved. -á-á- Lee Smolin "Three Roads to Quantum Gravity" |

Taiwanistan
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
192
|
Posted - 2012.02.26 16:42:00 -
[3468] - Quote
Elanor Vega wrote:No weapons in WiS. It must be forbidden in WiS by CONCORD and we would be scanned every time we enter public area. IF there must be the way to kill person that would be personal attacks - brake a neck of person or male attack. AND it have to be much more heavy sanctioned then in space. what's a male attack? One thing is for sure, you and I are not friends, buddies or pals so don't /emote me with DMC. That's DeMichael Crimson to you.            |

Anderron Shi
1st MC
16
|
Posted - 2012.02.26 16:47:00 -
[3469] - Quote
The development team is certainly on the right track, especially when saying things like "we decided to scale down development of avatar based gameplay and focus the bulk of our feature teams on spaceships." If you are only playing EVE because of the possibility that you'll be walking in a station in the future, please find a new game. This game is about spaceships. Keep WiS on the "slow burn", CCP. Actually, I think the game'd be better off if you threw the concept in the trash altogether. Get some! |

Elanor Vega
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
136
|
Posted - 2012.02.26 16:56:00 -
[3470] - Quote
Anderron Shi wrote:The development team is certainly on the right track, especially when saying things like "we decided to scale down development of avatar based gameplay and focus the bulk of our feature teams on spaceships." If you are only playing EVE because of the possibility that you'll be walking in a station in the future, please find a new game. This game is about spaceships. Keep WiS on the "slow burn", CCP. Actually, I think the game'd be better off if you threw the concept in the trash altogether.
It would be better if we threw you in the trash. Eve is Sci-Fi simulator - i think that ppl who created EVE know what they created. If you want spaceship flight simulator, go find another game, because EVE is not what are you looking for. |

Taiwanistan
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
192
|
Posted - 2012.02.26 16:56:00 -
[3471] - Quote
remember the eve forever or eve a future vision trailer where that chick shoots the guy dead? 1. that guy would wake up in his clone "welp i shoulda been hiding in my cq" 2. if it was in a hisec station, security drones or whatever would shredded that girl immediately after aggression. she would wake up in her clone and say "capping that a-hole was totally worth it".
that is how wis should be, not your "male attack" petting zoo. being in a safe zone would limit your game functions to the very basic. the cq is the equivalent of ship spinning. you shall not be allowed to lisp without risk. One thing is for sure, you and I are not friends, buddies or pals so don't /emote me with DMC. That's DeMichael Crimson to you.            |

Elanor Vega
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
136
|
Posted - 2012.02.26 16:59:00 -
[3472] - Quote
Taiwanistan wrote:Elanor Vega wrote:No weapons in WiS. It must be forbidden in WiS by CONCORD and we would be scanned every time we enter public area. IF there must be the way to kill person that would be personal attacks - brake a neck of person or male attack. AND it have to be much more heavy sanctioned then in space. what's a male attack?
All attacks where you must be close to the victim: stab, punch, throw (victim), brake (something on victim), daze... Or, is short, opposite of ranged attacks. |

Elanor Vega
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
136
|
Posted - 2012.02.26 17:09:00 -
[3473] - Quote
Taiwanistan wrote:remember the eve forever or eve a future vision trailer where that chick shoots the guy dead? 1. that guy would wake up in his clone "welp i shoulda been hiding in my cq" 2. if it was in a hisec station, security drones or whatever would shredded that girl immediately after aggression. she would wake up in her clone and say "capping that a-hole was totally worth it".
that is how wis should be, not your "male attack" petting zoo. being in a safe zone would limit your game functions to the very basic. the cq is the equivalent of ship spinning. you shall not be allowed to lisp without risk.
First: I am for male attacks (not range) so that you can defend yourself and that you are safer in the group.
Second: Stabbing or braking neck is petting to you?
Third: CONCORD knows that attacker is POD pilot and that death means nothing to him so there must be heavier punishment. And in the space if you have good tank, you are safe till concord comes in hi-sec, in person one shot and you are dead so there must be some extreme punishment after your death because you don't have a chance to survive attack. If they implement it your way - stations would be less secure then space and that's no good because then in station would have to be more money to earn then in space (risk - reward). So something must be radical.
|

Captain Africa
GRIM MARCH SpaceMonkey's Alliance
11
|
Posted - 2012.02.26 17:35:00 -
[3474] - Quote
Any Oblivion players here ? I have two words for CCP GÇ£Construction Set GÇ£!!!!!
I started playing oblivion way back , finished the game GǪand discovered the construction set . I played oblivion for two months GǪthat construction set kept me busy for two years lol I had no GǣmoddingGǥ experience at all and ended up creating a world almost the same size as the real game and so did about a 1000 other players. The end result was CONTENT (and I mean from clothes , dancing , food , monsters , new combat systems GǪup to blow jobs ! The skins or meshes the players developed was like 100% better than the original game.
This construction set put Bethesda on the world map .Now if CCP can knock on some doors and develop a construction set for the Eve player base we will create enough content to fill an entire universe in no time. CCP should brief the community on what they want (lets say an outpost interior hall) and let the community develop it. It will spread like wild fire !!!Do competitions etc for the best designs etc.
Just an ideaGǪbut very possible and if you donGÇÖt believe me have a look for yourself http://tes.nexusmods.com . This kid started a oblivion mod website a few years ago and now has 3,420,339 members. Imagine what CCP can do ! and we create our own universe
|

Taiwanistan
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
192
|
Posted - 2012.02.26 17:43:00 -
[3475] - Quote
ok my comment was more directed at Demichael Crimson, who wanted 100% safe hisec wis environment for lisping without risk. i agree killing people in hisec stations should have consequences but no more than podding in hisec space. hopefully team avatar will be able to devise adequate mechanics of attack/defense/evasion for all participants of the wis sandbox. and i imagine that is what they are doing now with prototyping gameplay.
One thing is for sure, you and I are not friends, buddies or pals so don't /emote me with DMC. That's DeMichael Crimson to you.            |

Guttripper
State War Academy Caldari State
54
|
Posted - 2012.02.26 17:45:00 -
[3476] - Quote
Elanor Vega wrote:Guttripper wrote:Elanor Vega wrote:No weapons in WiS. It must be forbidden in WiS by CONCORD and we would be scanned every time we enter public area. IF there must be the way to kill person that would be personal attacks - brake a neck of person or male attack. AND it have to be much more heavy sanctioned then in space. Meanwhile, CONCORD has no harbored guilty feelings about destroying your suicidal ship, potentially killing hundreds, if not thousands of nameless crew members following a quite safely immortal entity's orders who is then allowed to freely leave the death and destruction behind to continue his or her potential wrath of carnage... so?
Since you seem to be so callous to the plight of mere mortals, perhaps you will be judged guilty of being a serial killer by these same ~lesser~ people and need to be removed in their minds.
There could be the up-close and personal brute attack of having your meat body thrown through an establishment's wall. Unfortunately the wall was made of a cinder block and steel alloy combination and held while your meat body did not survive, even with those fancy Nex store clothing styles. (or)
A long range sniper attack using a plasma bolt Gauss rifle - nice and clean for the shooter but quite a mess for the local janitors to clean and sanitize. (or)
The impersonal attack of poisoning the alcoholic drinks of your player owned bar or tavern, causing the remaining patrons or surviving family members to rend your meat body for being so careless.
Of course, being an immortal, these moments are but mere setbacks unless:
As your electrical brain wave scan enters your clone body, someone "accidentally" grounded your lower half of your clone corpse onto the metallic station floor, causing the same brain wave scan to be dispersed across the station and thus lost. (or)
The embalming fluid used to preserve your clone was replaced with hydrochloric acid, and thus when you are then reanimated, the acid eats your flesh alive. (or)
Someone hacks into the local station drones to snatch your cloning chamber from its roost once it is animated. While it will be held together by Minmatar technology known as duct tape, these drones will jettison your chamber into a slow, but descending orbit around the nearest star.
Just think of all the fun and games people could have if the sandbox aspect of Eve stretched through walking in stations! And after reading Captain Africa's post about potentially modding the whole universe, my sarcastic ideas over brutal deaths suddenly could be the tip of the iceberg! |

Captain Africa
GRIM MARCH SpaceMonkey's Alliance
11
|
Posted - 2012.02.26 19:47:00 -
[3477] - Quote
CCP and for now instead of docking up all by your lonesome walking around pointless in the captains quarters, why not at least give us a npc? I mean FFS I turn a few billion a month surely I should have a PA (personal assistant ) to look after some of my interests. I mean , lets say you could buy a lev 1 clone that could do a,b and c. A lev 2 clone can do a,b,c and d etc. Oh and of course you create your own npc avatar clone through character customization.
Get some service providers in game that links with your NPC PA. You give your PA instructions and pay a premium for the service like . GÇóRefuling your pos ..the lower the security of system the more you pay GǪ GÇóBuying items on contract outside your region GǪ GÇóOrdering boosters through your PA GÇóPlacing of recruitment ads (the bigger or more impressive ads cost more ) and you can only do it through your PA GǪ GÇóYour PA negotiate standings with other npc corps.and can improve or screw your standings by % margin. GÇóYour PA can give you stats on your personal accomplishments for the week or month or that of your corp. Like a financial breakdown. GÇóLet her notify you when you get storylines to do GǪ GÇóMake her wear a new outfit everyday GǪ.(like a weekly wardrobe ). GÇóInformation goes a long way in Eve ...put a prise tag on information and let it manifest through your pa ....Maybe let her monitor the market for you GǪlike sharp item increases or decreases.
I mean the list can go on GǪ GǪand on. Im not just talking about eye candy here but real interaction that is functional to the player GǪ |

Soulpirate
State War Academy Caldari State
113
|
Posted - 2012.02.26 19:58:00 -
[3478] - Quote
Taiwanistan wrote:remember the eve forever or eve a future vision trailer where that chick shoots the guy dead? 1. that guy would wake up in his clone "welp i shoulda been hiding in my cq" 2. if it was in a hisec station, security drones or whatever would shredded that girl immediately after aggression. she would wake up in her clone and say "capping that a-hole was totally worth it".
that is how wis should be, not your "male attack" petting zoo. being in a safe zone would limit your game functions to the very basic. the cq is the equivalent of ship spinning. you shall not be allowed to lisp without risk. Totally agree that WiS should have the same risk as FiS when it comes to PvP. Only place you should be safe is in your CQ. I don't see why they cant develope the same security zone type policing for stations as they have for space. However I would hope that these security zones are within each station rather than mimicing the space the station is on. Riskier areas on the station brining more risk yet more chance of making isk.
WiS needs to be the avatar version of FiS as much as possible.
I know it would be way in the future, but imagin incursions happening on stations as well as in space. Maybe you find some faction mob lurking in one of the low-sec areas of the station, terminate him for whatever it is he may be carring.
Oh, and btw, did y'all mean "Melee attacks", because "male attack" sounds like a kick to the groin or something, and I dont want that. |

Elanor Vega
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
136
|
Posted - 2012.02.26 20:19:00 -
[3479] - Quote
Soulpirate wrote: Oh, and btw, did y'all mean "Melee attacks", because "male attack" sounds like a kick to the groin or something, and I dont want that.
Ok, my bad...  Every person wrote that word differently and i didn't check whats write spelling.
but... a kick to the groin... why not? I am a gal... i like to do that to guys...  |

Crucis Cassiopeiae
EvE-COM
895
|
Posted - 2012.02.26 23:32:00 -
[3480] - Quote
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:I'll be NOT worrying about this at all till I see Skillbooks for Karate, Knives and Handguns.
"Grenade Skill allows 1000m greater tossing distance per level."
MMA fights in EVE.   I want to be new EVEs Cro Cop   |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 159 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |