I heard about this exploit and it almost made me vomit.]

I heard about this exploit and it almost made me vomit.

The current mission system allows exploiters to base out in a 0.5 system to maximize their mission rewards
(the rewards are increased due to the risk of getting low-sec missions)

I heard about this exploit and it almost made me vomit.

I guess EXPLOIT is the forum buzz word of the week.

That's totally exploiting what I was going to say.

Hmm... you can't be serious.

Of all the complaints lately this must be scrapping the bottom of the barrel.

If this keeps up it'll be hardly even worth reading GD.

The Gate:
Permanently tanking sentry guns is trivial so establishing permanent high scan resolution 80km infinite point camps can be done with month old characters.

I want to gank expensive & helpless PVE ships with my special fit PVP ship, and I shall whine until CCP hands those players over to me on a silver platter.

And the OP doesn't list the consequence for declining such missions, a big minus to standings. Which is one of the reasons to run missions in the first place.

0/10.

The current mission system allows exploiters to base out in a 0.5 system to maximize their mission rewards
(the rewards are increased due to the risk of getting low-sec missions)

Gee, how about the much better "exploit" of running missions in a 0.5 system that doesn't even have any lowsec nearby?
:P

YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING ME!!!!
Does this game get ANY easier?

FW and moon goo

I am ... I am... no longer playing this game.

Can I have your stuff?

Sure, but it is in low-sec, where nobody will ever go.

Sure, but it is in low-sec, where nobody will ever go.

I need you to be online I only have 1 contract at a time and stuff in like 54 systems.

Hmmm... if this is indeed an exploit, shouldn't this thread be reported for blatantly telling players how to exploit?

Ah screw it, I was gonna quit but then I found out Hilmar wears $1000 Pants.

Ah screw it, I was gonna quit but then I found out Hilmar wears $1000 Pants.

Apparently I'm a dirty exploiter. I put an industrial toon in a station that had distro missions I wanted to do for that corp. Every 15 to 20 missions I would get a delivery to a low sec station. I did some research and found the station belonged to a pirate corp based there. I scouted ahead and found the other side of the gate camped. I went back later and found Nagas camping off the station.

So let me examine what the OP said.

I'm supposed to run the gauntlet of a pirate corp that will start expecting me. Once I die my cargo will be impossible to deliver, so I automatically lose standing, a ship, and possibly training implants ... to get an L4 payout of 300k isk?

You must be out of your frigging mind. I already have to wait 4 hours. Pretty sure its a big enough penalty already.

This forum really needs to institute 24 hour to 1 week bans for varying degrees of idiocy. OP would be gone for a month.

I'm petitioning all of you for discussing exploits.

I heard about this exploit and it almost made me vomit.

The current mission system allows exploiters to base out in a 0.5 system to maximize their mission rewards
(the rewards are increased due to the risk of getting low-sec missions)

rather than factoring the additional risk, people exploit by declining any missions that take them into low-security space.

Of course the poor-state of low-security mechanics would need to be re-worked.


The Gate:
Permanently tanking sentry guns is trivial so establishing permanent high scan resolution 80km infinite point camps can be done with month old characters.

The Mission:
With proper skills and probing implants It is possible to get warp-able hits at 32 AU probes, this has become incredibly easy with the new mid-slot modules,

What I'd like to see CCP do:
Remove all ISK gained from the exploiters.
Add E-War to gate guns (ECM, Damps, Disruption, Neutralizer)
Require probes to be at 1AU or less before a warp-able hit is possible.

The fact that low-security space is broken, doesn't mean we should allow people to exploit the game.

Yet another quitter, overpromising and underdelivering.

This thread is finally going places.

yeah CCP needs to improve the exploit so that it actually does induce vomiting. Perhaps adding camera shake when declining a mission would do it.