| Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Dracil Cegon
   |
Posted - 2005.12.08 18:02:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Dracil Cegon on 08/12/2005 18:03:17
Now that I actually tried pinging from campus with their nice connection, I found that I get a 215 ping from here (they have a 5ms ping to Google). That made me curious as to what sorts of pings people on the West Coast of the US get pinging 157.157.139.10 (oh traceroute doesn't work, our campus blocks off the trace at like the 4th hop).
The thing is, while in-game with our current crappy dorm connection (that's being linked to this campus connection in a few weeks), it doesn't feel very laggy in-game. Well, my warp drives go up to 75%, reset to 0, and then zoom to 100% a lot, and thrusters get drawn in front of my ship when slowing down, and weapons taking a long time to untarget on a destroyed ship, but other than that, I don't usually notice the lag much.
|
Osunn
|
Posted - 2005.12.08 18:57:00 -
[2]
I'm getting 231 from rural northern California.
|
SengH
|
Posted - 2005.12.08 19:00:00 -
[3]
153 ms. LA
|
Clutch Cargo
|
Posted - 2005.12.08 19:02:00 -
[4]
Although technically not on the coast, here in Tucson Arizona I am getting 143ms.
|
Lansfear
|
Posted - 2005.12.08 19:03:00 -
[5]
220ms.
Texas. Makes pvp a *****.
Normaly i get 55ms until i hit the Europe side, then it jumps to 220. 
|
Bloederig
|
Posted - 2005.12.08 19:06:00 -
[6]
I'm having a responsetime of 34ms with my connection here.
I'm living in the Netherlands btw.
Although it's that fast, server is down for me atm 
Oh? Hi. :) |
EaglesFire
|
Posted - 2005.12.08 19:09:00 -
[7]
254ms from western Washington State
"Knowledge is power, and the uninformed SHALL be punished!" |
MellaRinn
|
Posted - 2005.12.08 19:23:00 -
[8]
Just to compare - my ping from London @ 8MBit connection with poor actual bandwidth (2MBit negotiation) the pings go 15ms.
Poor West coast guys 
|
Kurtan
|
Posted - 2005.12.08 19:25:00 -
[9]
I get average 16ms, till I get to Amsterdam then shoots up to avg 164ms.
Los Angeles area.
|
Kerushi
|
Posted - 2005.12.08 19:44:00 -
[10]
 Originally by: Kurtan
I get average 16ms, till I get to Amsterdam then shoots up to avg 164ms.
Los Angeles area.
between 25 to 38ms to 157.157.139.10 from holland with a amsterdam hop
________________
|
VantDre
|
Posted - 2005.12.08 20:16:00 -
[11]
Closer to the backbone of your areas Internet City Hub, the better.
Nothing to do with the west coast in general, just your respective
distances via networks.
I moved from a very large city to a college town, its respectively
less reliable go figure, since colleges started this whole non-sense,
but thats corporatized graphical human physical representation for you,
having most of the hubs actualy located in Downtowns.
|
NickWest
|
Posted - 2005.12.08 20:26:00 -
[12]
From Bellevue WA:
Minimum = 190ms, Maximum = 194ms, Average = 191ms
My ISP is Comcast
|
Mirirar
|
Posted - 2005.12.08 20:28:00 -
[13]
35-50 ms
|
PaulAtreides
|
Posted - 2005.12.08 20:35:00 -
[14]
I am getting 166.019ms avg.
Venice, CA
|
Saeris Tal'Urduar
|
Posted - 2005.12.08 21:29:00 -
[15]
Edited by: Saeris Tal''Urduar on 08/12/2005 21:30:39
208ms Portland Or. on DSL
edit: 208 average
|
Drakma
|
Posted - 2005.12.08 21:33:00 -
[16]
126ms average from New Hampshire.
|
GuruJ
|
Posted - 2005.12.08 21:46:00 -
[17]
Des Moines, Wa (by Sea Tac Airport)
184ms min - 185ms max - average 184ms.
Comcast Cable
|
Kaell Meynn
|
Posted - 2005.12.08 21:49:00 -
[18]
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 196ms, Maximum = 199ms, Average = 197ms
Spokane, WA
Comcast Cable Service
|
Amazoph
|
Posted - 2005.12.08 21:52:00 -
[19]
26ms average, near Edinburgh, UK 
|
TimeKeepr
|
Posted - 2005.12.08 21:54:00 -
[20]
178ms
from the Bay Area, California, with earthlink DSL
|
EpyonNext
|
Posted - 2005.12.08 21:56:00 -
[21]
Getting 317ms from Korea. Not too bad considering distance.
|
FrontC
|
Posted - 2005.12.08 21:56:00 -
[22]
Vancouver, BC here;
Min=164ms, Max=178ms, Avg=168ms
When I do a tracert it's all fast (ie. <30ms) until it hits a German server at hop 12 - then goes to 170ms for the rest of the route.
|
Torvail
|
Posted - 2005.12.08 22:08:00 -
[23]
150msish Portland, OR
on cable
----
Alone and slamming Quafe
Not an alt, newbie corp ftw! |
Saeris Tal'Urduar
|
Posted - 2005.12.08 22:19:00 -
[24]
Originally by: Torvail
150msish Portland, OR
on cable
Me thinks I should switch to cable.
Tho the cost suks. $15 vs $50
.....Mmmmm naa F' Comcast, I'll stick with DSL
60 better ping isnt worth $35 extra a month.
But the rumor is they're going to go 8mb sometime after the new year.
|
Riffix
|
Posted - 2005.12.08 22:34:00 -
[25]
152-153ms from Los Angeles
"Lead, follow, or get the #@$@#$ out of the way" |
SghnDubh
|
Posted - 2005.12.08 23:07:00 -
[26]
205 from San Francisco on DSL.
PVP is generally not possible if there are more than about 10 players in the immediate theater.
What doesn't kill you makes you stronger...
Fight Smart: www.BattleClinic.com
|
woodman az
|
Posted - 2005.12.08 23:16:00 -
[27]
197 to 228 from Gilbert Arizona. 46 to San Francisco then a long jump to Germany (210 on the last ping) then 4 - 5 more to Iceland.
Proud member of the 2
|
lollerskates
|
Posted - 2005.12.09 00:18:00 -
[28]
Reply from 157.157.139.10: bytes=32 time=159ms TTL=238
Reply from 157.157.139.10: bytes=32 time=159ms TTL=238
Reply from 157.157.139.10: bytes=32 time=157ms TTL=238
Reply from 157.157.139.10: bytes=32 time=165ms TTL=238
Half Moon Bay California, not bad ping for the middle of nowhere ;_;
Comcast FTW! Tt's COMCASTIC!
|
HybridMiner
|
Posted - 2005.12.09 00:24:00 -
[29]
Pinging 157.157.139.10 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 157.157.139.10: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=236
Reply from 157.157.139.10: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=236
Reply from 157.157.139.10: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=236
Reply from 157.157.139.10: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=236
Ping statistics for 157.157.139.10:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 28ms, Maximum = 29ms, Average = 28ms
I'm so glad i live in Glasgow
|
Broc Vallion
|
Posted - 2005.12.09 03:10:00 -
[30]
Dunedin,New Zealand 315ms.......not tooooo bad
|
Zaphroid Eulthran
|
Posted - 2005.12.09 03:31:00 -
[31]
20 miles outside london servers,
Minimum = 30ms, maximum = 49ms, average = 35ms
trace goes via Frankfurt |
Gouglash
|
Posted - 2005.12.09 03:33:00 -
[32]
Minimum = 162ms, Maximum = 256ms, Average = 205ms
From Victoria, BC.
|
noob tube
|
Posted - 2005.12.09 03:36:00 -
[33]
Edited by: noob tube on 09/12/2005 03:36:00
avg 163ms. :*(
coming from the bay area, california, near san francisco.
6mbit connection.
|
Squill Tepes
|
Posted - 2005.12.09 03:39:00 -
[34]
Minimum = 90ms, Maximum = 107ms, Average = 98ms
This is coming from Richmond, Virginia.
~Squill Tepes |
Omber Zombie
|
Posted - 2005.12.09 04:10:00 -
[35]
367ms from melb, australia
----------------------
Originally by: Seleene
OZ IS EVIL! HE WILL CRUSH YOUR WILL TO LIVE WITHIN HIS IRON GRASP
|
OffBeaT
|
Posted - 2005.12.09 04:21:00 -
[36]
yea, im out west right now in BC and theping is so crappy from here i dont think ill even bother too play eve much combat wise or anything wise till i get back too the east cost.
|
Erised Eman
|
Posted - 2005.12.09 04:28:00 -
[37]
Reno Nevada looks like this...
Reply from 157.157.139.10: bytes=32 time=166ms TTL=241
Reply from 157.157.139.10: bytes=32 time=166ms TTL=241
Reply from 157.157.139.10: bytes=32 time=159ms TTL=241
Reply from 157.157.139.10: bytes=32 time=162ms TTL=241
Ping statistics for 157.157.139.10:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 159ms, Maximum = 166ms, Average = 163ms
Fine for mining.
|
Montague Zooma
|
Posted - 2005.12.09 04:41:00 -
[38]
174ms from Tacoma.
|
Freyer
|
Posted - 2005.12.09 04:52:00 -
[39]
367ms from 120Km east of Melbourne Australia
Tell me IĈm pretty |
Kula Alpha
|
Posted - 2005.12.09 04:55:00 -
[40]
152-156 ms from 30 miles N of San Francisco, Comcast.
|
Linavin
|
Posted - 2005.12.09 05:00:00 -
[41]
Edited by: Linavin on 09/12/2005 05:00:30
150-158 ms, 20 miles south of San Francisco
---
Where are the named 800mm Plates and Modal Mega Ions CCP? |
slip66
|
Posted - 2005.12.09 05:06:00 -
[42]
Originally by: Squill Tepes
Minimum = 90ms, Maximum = 107ms, Average = 98ms
This is coming from Richmond, Virginia.
I get the same here in Chesapeake.
0/ neighbor
|
Arabian Goggle
|
Posted - 2005.12.09 06:46:00 -
[43]
I am averaging 82ms (Alberta, Canada). What is considered good?
|
Gunstar Zero
|
Posted - 2005.12.09 07:00:00 -
[44]
Q: What's Eve like with those higher latencies?
|
Saeris Tal'Urduar
|
Posted - 2005.12.09 07:27:00 -
[45]
Originally by: Gunstar Zero
Q: What's Eve like with those higher latencies?
I've only noticed it hurts during a fleet battle.
30+ players and the advantage goes to those with the better latency.
|
Dracil Cegon
|
Posted - 2005.12.09 17:03:00 -
[46]
But is that because of the latency itself, or because of something else that also causes the latency, like not enough bandwidth?
|
Sinari Galdrin
|
Posted - 2005.12.09 17:11:00 -
[47]
Edited by: Sinari Galdrin on 09/12/2005 17:14:15
Originally by: Zaphroid Eulthran
20 miles outside london servers,
Minimum = 30ms, maximum = 49ms, average = 35ms
trace goes via Frankfurt
Oddly, it does here, from Yorkshire:
3 2 ms 2 ms 2 ms <us>
4 21 ms 30 ms * at0-0-0-3-xfs-x-many.th25.core.rtr.gxn.net [195
224.217.129]
5 45 ms 32 ms 22 ms g1-1-2.cr02.tn5.bb.pipex.net [194.143.163.137]
6 20 ms 19 ms 20 ms ldn-b3-geth3-1.telia.net [213.248.100.213]
7 19 ms 20 ms 20 ms ldn-bb1-pos6-1-0.telia.net [213.248.65.237]
8 29 ms 20 ms 32 ms ldn-b2-pos9-0.telia.net [213.248.74.2]
9 22 ms 22 ms 20 ms dtag.telia.net [213.248.75.106]
10 21 ms * 22 ms linx-gw13.LON.GB.net.DTAG.DE [62.154.5.38]
11 230 ms 295 ms 301 ms 62.153.203.190
12 25 ms 22 ms 28 ms 157.157.62.10
13 23 ms 30 ms 26 ms 157.157.139.252
14 24 ms 22 ms 24 ms 157.157.139.10
hop 11 - 62.153.203.190 is in Germany somewhere:
inetnum: 62.153.202.0 - 62.153.203.255
netname: DTAG-TRANSIT5
descr: Deutsche Telekom AG
Ah - that could be why:
157.157.139.10 is listed on RIPE as being in Iceland - so maybe the packets travel around a bit trying to get to Iceland then come back to London. (?)
(or maybe it does go to Iceland then gets sent over a private link back to London, or something)
I wouldn't expect Linx to route packets to Germany if the destination was in London. It's normally better than that..
Maybe if the servers ARE in London, if the network was moved to being listed as actually being in London it would be quicker as there are undoubtably quicker links between the US and London than between the US and Iceland..
|
Locke DieDrake
|
Posted - 2005.12.09 17:17:00 -
[48]
From my office in Portland, Oregon
Tracing route to 157.157.139.10 over a maximum of 30 hops
1 1 ms 2 ms 1 ms 192.168.0.254
2 9 ms 10 ms 9 ms 199.107.164.125
3 10 ms 11 ms 10 ms 199.107.167.209
4 13 ms 11 ms 11 ms 199.107.167.4
5 11 ms 13 ms 12 ms 12.118.177.17
6 44 ms 40 ms 40 ms gbr1-p80.st6wa.ip.att.net [12.123.203.182]
7 42 ms 47 ms 39 ms tbr1-p012501.st6wa.ip.att.net [12.122.12.157]
8 40 ms 42 ms 66 ms tbr2-cl10.sffca.ip.att.net [12.122.12.113]
9 35 ms 35 ms 66 ms 12.123.12.5
10 35 ms 39 ms 38 ms 192.205.32.154
11 169 ms 171 ms 193 ms isp-linx-gw13-o.nmc-m.dtag.de [217.239.38.241]
12 184 ms 173 ms 203 ms 62.153.203.190
13 181 ms 167 ms 170 ms 157.157.62.10
14 179 ms 166 ms 167 ms 157.157.139.252
15 166 ms 166 ms 170 ms 157.157.139.10
Trace complete.
Reply from 157.157.139.10: bytes=32 time=169ms TTL=240
Reply from 157.157.139.10: bytes=32 time=165ms TTL=240
Reply from 157.157.139.10: bytes=32 time=167ms TTL=240
Reply from 157.157.139.10: bytes=32 time=187ms TTL=240
Ping statistics for 157.157.139.10:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 165ms, Maximum = 187ms, Average = 172ms
___________________________________________
The deeper you stick it in your vein, the deeper the thoughts there's no more pain.
___________________________________________ |
Lansfear
|
Posted - 2005.12.09 17:18:00 -
[49]
Originally by: Gunstar Zero
Q: What's Eve like with those higher latencies?
Imagine a 1 second delay in everything you do and everything you see.....
Yeah, pvp sucks.
|
Rowan Lyon
|
Posted - 2005.12.09 17:18:00 -
[50]
Edited by: Rowan Lyon on 09/12/2005 17:25:01
Edited by: Rowan Lyon on 09/12/2005 17:24:45
Minimum = 174ms, Maximum = 178ms, Average = 175ms
I'm in Edmonton, Alberta.
Edit: Here's the trace. Also got nailed at Germany.
Tracing route to 157.157.139.10 over a maximum of 30 hops
1 29 ms 23 ms 23 ms 70.74.0.1
2 46 ms 23 ms 24 ms rc2ar-ge9-1-3.ed.shawcable.net [64.59.189.51]
3 52 ms 25 ms 23 ms rc1ar-pos15-0.ed.shawcable.net [66.163.70.13]
4 73 ms 43 ms 41 ms rc1bb-pos13-0.vc.shawcable.net [66.163.76.161]
5 52 ms 44 ms 47 ms rc1wt-pos2-2.wa.shawcable.net [66.163.76.54]
6 49 ms 47 ms 47 ms ge-6-1.car4.Seattle1.Level3.net [63.211.200.29]
7 70 ms 47 ms 47 ms ae-1-53.mp1.Seattle1.Level3.net [4.68.105.65]
8 62 ms 59 ms 60 ms so-3-0-0.mp2.SanFrancisco1.Level3.net [209.247.8
.90]
9 84 ms 59 ms 59 ms ge-7-0-0.gar1.SanFrancisco1.Level3.net [4.68.124
.210]
10 62 ms 59 ms 59 ms 4.68.111.54
11 179 ms 179 ms 180 ms isp-linx-gw13-o.nmc-m.dtag.de [217.239.38.241]
12 182 ms 179 ms 179 ms 62.153.203.190
13 181 ms 179 ms 179 ms 157.157.62.10
14 183 ms 185 ms 179 ms 157.157.139.252
15 205 ms 185 ms 180 ms 157.157.139.10
Trace complete.
|
Kerosene
|
Posted - 2005.12.09 17:24:00 -
[51]
Edited by: Kerosene on 09/12/2005 17:25:25
Guangzhou, China
Reply from 157.157.139.10: bytes=32 time=469ms TTL=236
Reply from 157.157.139.10: bytes=32 time=471ms TTL=236
Reply from 157.157.139.10: bytes=32 time=467ms TTL=236
Reply from 157.157.139.10: bytes=32 time=462ms TTL=236
PvP is very playable for me. Sure I get a 1s delay minimum but all that means is I can't be the tackler. Just got to adjust your gamestyle a bit to compensate.
__
|
Dracil Cegon
|
Posted - 2005.12.09 17:31:00 -
[52]
Originally by: Sinari Galdrin
Ah - that could be why:
157.157.139.10 is listed on RIPE as being in Iceland - so maybe the packets travel around a bit trying to get to Iceland then come back to London. (?)
(or maybe it does go to Iceland then gets sent over a private link back to London, or something)
I wouldn't expect Linx to route packets to Germany if the destination was in London. It's normally better than that..
(Actually, it MUST be going to Iceland - 157.157.62.10 is an Iceland Telecom IP address - so I guess it's going UK -> Germany -> Iceland -> (private link) -> London)
Maybe if the servers ARE in London, if the network was moved to being listed as actually being in London it would be quicker as there are undoubtably quicker links between the US and London than between the US and Iceland..
Interesting... so if CCP somehow figured out how to stop it to go through Iceland first (either it's going through CCP itself, or it's going through some Icelandic company that puts their servers in London), then latency could be improved all-around for everyone by removing all these detours!
|
Gcuz
|
Posted - 2005.12.09 17:48:00 -
[53]
Pinging 157.157.139.10 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 157.157.139.10: bytes=32 time=150ms TTL=237
Reply from 157.157.139.10: bytes=32 time=150ms TTL=237
Reply from 157.157.139.10: bytes=32 time=150ms TTL=237
Reply from 157.157.139.10: bytes=32 time=154ms TTL=237
Not too bad for connecting from Clinton, Iowa USA.
This was from work while connecting to our Quest T1 line. Ping was below 58 untill hop 14, then it jumps to 150 - 160 range.
13 57 ms 54 ms 58 ms 62.156.139.21
14 159 ms 217 ms 161 ms linx-gw13.LON.GB.net.DTAG.DE [62.154.5.38]
15 151 ms 160 ms 163 ms 62.153.203.190
16 151 ms 153 ms 154 ms 157.157.62.10
17 157 ms 153 ms 153 ms 157.157.139.252
18 160 ms 153 ms 158 ms 157.157.139.10
I'll retest and post from home on my cable modem (Mediacom 6Mbit connection)
|
Dal'thiron
|
Posted - 2005.12.09 18:12:00 -
[54]
1 3 ms 2 ms 4 ms 192.168.200.1
2 8 ms 10 ms 8 ms 10.213.231.70
3 10 ms 8 ms 9 ms nat.alliancetitle.com [204.228.231.129]
4 9 ms 8 ms 10 ms gi2-3.core1.boi.spro.net [198.60.194.25]
5 18 ms 12 ms 10 ms 207.170.250.121
6 11 ms 10 ms 13 ms core-02-ge-3-1-0-508.bois.twtelecom.net [66.192.
248.140]
7 77 ms 76 ms 76 ms core-01-so-1-1-0-0.nycl.twtelecom.net [66.192.24
0.9]
8 79 ms 80 ms 76 ms tran-02-ge-0-2-0-1.nycl.twtelecom.net [66.192.24
0.42]
9 77 ms 91 ms 79 ms 66.192.252.250
10 168 ms 166 ms 167 ms linx-gw13.LON.GB.net.DTAG.DE [62.154.5.38]
11 167 ms 166 ms 169 ms 62.153.203.190
12 170 ms 171 ms 171 ms 157.157.62.10
13 175 ms 176 ms 177 ms 157.157.139.252
14 174 ms 173 ms 172 ms 157.157.139.10
Boise, Idaho Home of the great big whopping potato.
|
Lansfear
|
Posted - 2005.12.10 05:49:00 -
[55]
Originally by: Kerosene
PvP is very playable for me. Sure I get a 1s delay minimum but all that means is I can't be the tackler. Just got to adjust your gamestyle a bit to compensate.
But I love being tackler.
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |