| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
KilROCK
   |
Posted - 2005.12.12 08:20:00 -
[1]
Boost our ships by 50% DPS, Give us unbreakable tanks, locking range of 300km or we'll park our flying junkyard infront of CCP. It'll smell like crap. Beware minmatar! 
|
KilROCK
|
Posted - 2005.12.12 08:59:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Aloysius Knight
gah ffs bloody forums ****ed my post
im talking about how the minmatar carrier is the worst out of all of them
and had this hugh post 
It's not :\
it's actually the best one with all these sexy support features.
|
KilROCK
|
Posted - 2005.12.12 09:04:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Aloysius Knight
waht a 5% reduction in cycle time for shield and armour reps?
wow thats sooo good
compare the stats of all 4 carriers and the bonus, minmatar come out fair behind the others
Did you even check the Cap need and ROF on Capital remote armor/shield repairers? Do you know how easy it is to pop a fighter drone?
Do you know it's kinda easy to rep 5 battleship at once with a single mothership and do ebil gate camps?
|
KilROCK
|
Posted - 2005.12.12 09:11:00 -
[4]
Edited by: KilROCK on 12/12/2005 09:11:15
Originally by: Aloysius Knight
not really, minmater carrier has the lowests base cap of all the carriers
if anything it should be a reduction in the cap need to use those items
Lol, ok fine.
let's have a 5% to all fighter drone damage and 5% to shield/armor resistance per level?
|
KilROCK
|
Posted - 2005.12.12 09:21:00 -
[5]
Boost 1400mm Base damage mod by 2x 
|
KilROCK
|
Posted - 2005.12.12 09:26:00 -
[6]
Originally by: TomB
We don't hate Minmatar, we CCPers (Icelanders) once were slaves as well
I always wet myself thinking i'd see a note from TomB saying someone about a little boost coming toward minmatar but it's only something comical (yes it is but sniff).
|
KilROCK
|
Posted - 2005.12.12 09:29:00 -
[7]
Edited by: KilROCK on 12/12/2005 09:32:43
Edited by: KilROCK on 12/12/2005 09:32:08
Originally by: Beast Rabban
wtf??? The cyclone is a friggen juggernaut post rmr. It can kill a HAC or Raven. Just had one tanking my raven on sisi without its nos going. Need max skills like all minny ships though.
Hi, Thanks for joining us. This topic is about Motherships, and Artillery sucking in RMR.
Also, i'd like to point out, the only reason the cyclone performs better is due to the aweson'ness of Invulnerability field II and damage control II's/Named.
And not for forget, it's 5th med slots which makes it a mean bastard of strong tanking goodness.
Too bad that also means the ferox gets to tank like a god now, even tho it deals pathetic damage.
|
KilROCK
|
Posted - 2005.12.12 09:39:00 -
[8]
Originally by: TomB
There won't be more balancing done before RMR at this stage. But there are multiple issues that will be looked into post RMR 
Only bean I'll spill out of my mouth is that the dirty Typhoon optimal bonus will be looked at and most likely replaced with a launcher bonus to make it more aggressive and to share the bonuses between the 4/4 slots.
Oh my, freaking, lovely God. Can i sit on your lap santa?
Thanks for the info  
Also, I'll use my lame powers to make you push release date of RMR to january 2006.
|
KilROCK
|
Posted - 2005.12.12 11:01:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Adril Alatar
Originally by: SengH
Originally by: TomB
There won't be more balancing done before RMR at this stage. But there are multiple issues that will be looked into post RMR
Only bean I'll spill out of my mouth is that the dirty Typhoon optimal bonus will be looked at and most likely replaced with a launcher bonus to make it more aggressive and to share the bonuses between the 4/4 slots.
O.o typhoon actually becoming useful... maybe tossing in a drone bonus as well?
i would suggest a -10% reduction in drone control unit cpu need bonus 
I think you forget the fact they need around 70,000 PG to be fitted...
|
KilROCK
|
Posted - 2005.12.12 11:17:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Randuin MaraL
Originally by: TomB
There won't be more balancing done before RMR at this stage. But there are multiple issues that will be looked into post RMR
Only bean I'll spill out of my mouth is that the dirty Typhoon optimal bonus will be looked at and most likely replaced with a launcher bonus to make it more aggressive and to share the bonuses between the 4/4 slots.
What about an alternate/additional NOS-bonus?
What the.... They won't put a 3rd bonus on battleships, it's 2. I don't care for Nos bonus, it's going to make the typhoon the most used ***** ship ever.
At least we get to pick missile launcher or AC or BOTH with this nifty bonus change.
|
KilROCK
|
Posted - 2005.12.12 13:51:00 -
[11]
Some people are never freaking happy....
|
| |
|