Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Harry Forever
SpaceJunkys
574
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 14:13:00 -
[1] - Quote
CCP needs to support individuals who want to go big
I'm thinking of a nukebomb at the price of 1 billion
100.000 HP damager on a 40k radius https:// |

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
3228
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 14:16:00 -
[2] - Quote
--> Features & Ideas Discussion
The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'Hodor'. |

flakeys
Antwerpse Kerels R O G U E
1299
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 14:19:00 -
[3] - Quote
Harry Forever wrote:CCP needs to support individuals who want to go big
I'm thinking of a nukebomb at the price of 1 billion
100.000 HP damager on a 40k radius
I want an individual nuker too .
Costs 100 B but you can nuke one individual into biomass with it and i got just the guy in mind i want to try it on ... can you guess who harry ?
Come on , just one try ...
We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
|

Stitcher
Re-Awakened Technologies Inc
1843
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 14:20:00 -
[4] - Quote
40Km radius.
"mini" nuke.
An in-character blog and a video: http://verinsjournal.blogspot.com http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tu1mbsgo738
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
15957
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 14:21:00 -
[5] - Quote
Harry Forever wrote:CCP needs to support individuals who want to go big No, they don't. In fact, it turned out to be such a bad idea that they removed it because of how much fun-removing power it gave to one person. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan 2.0. |

flakeys
Antwerpse Kerels R O G U E
1299
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 14:23:00 -
[6] - Quote
Stitcher wrote:40Km radius.
"mini" nuke.
The big one he had in mind will nuke a whole constellation , so yeah mini nuke .
We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
|

Alice Saki
Mind Games. Suddenly Spaceships.
79365
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 14:24:00 -
[7] - Quote
Stealth DD Driveby Nerf thread....
|

Plastic Psycho
Necro-Economics
248
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 14:45:00 -
[8] - Quote
Harry Forever wrote:CCP needs to support individuals who want to go big
I'm thinking of a nukebomb at the price of 1 billion
100.000 HP damager on a 40k radius We have mini-nukes. In a number of differnt forms. What you're asking for is a Maxi-nuke! 
Relevant. |

William Walker
House Aratus Fatal Ascension
205
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 14:52:00 -
[9] - Quote
The Tsar bomba had a yield of 50 to 58 megatons of TNT. It was originally constructed to have 100 megatons of TNT. That would have had an estimated destruction radius of 35km.
We already have bombs and they inflict enough damage to small targets and have a radius of 15km. The scale of EVE ships is large already, and creating "mega-bombs" or bombs already bigger than the ones we have now would be an imbalance.
CCP is not here to empower your crusade against nullsec, King Harry Forever of Highsec, first of his name, lord protector of the 4 realms, leader of the anti-nullsec crusade. pâ+(*GîÆGêçGîÆ*)n+ë pü+(pé£GêçpÇü-¦)pü+ (GùòGÇ+GùòG£+) |

Azami Nevinyrall
Carbon Circle Tactical Narcotics Team
1101
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 14:57:00 -
[10] - Quote
A mini nuke (in todays tech) is the EVE equivalent of a bomb that has a 6km AOE.
What you're asking for is a OP weapon that'll break more mechanics then George Bush rigging his 2nd term... I'm currently taking bets on the following: - CCP Games becomes EA Games' property. - EVE Online will have Microtranctions everywhere. |

Harry Forever
SpaceJunkys
575
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 14:58:00 -
[11] - Quote
William Walker wrote:The Tsar bomba had a yield of 50 to 58 megatons of TNT. It was originally constructed to have 100 megatons of TNT. That would have had an estimated destruction radius of 35km.
We already have bombs and they inflict enough damage to small targets and have a radius of 15km. The scale of EVE ships is large already, and creating "mega-bombs" or bombs already bigger than the ones we have now would be an imbalance.
CCP is not here to empower your crusade against nullsec, King Harry Forever of Highsec, first of his name, lord protector of the 4 realms, leader of the anti-nullsec crusade.
sure we need it, and the game needs it as well... at the moment the focus is too much on alliances and groups... there are many soloplayers who are able to build up big amount of ISK on their own, but the superweapon to use it is missing
if I'm able to build an amount of ISK comparable to a corp, then I want to have a weapon to fight that corp
the only balance needs to be the price for the weapon, that can be discussed https:// |

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
3279
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 14:59:00 -
[12] - Quote
A heavy missile has a yield of 41 kT.
So what's asked for here is a "bigger bomb".
But I think there are a lot of people who can harken back to the days of the old Doomsday Device, and the "Drive-by DD".
So anything that comes even close to it, a "BIG AOE weapon", is going to make people nervous.
Presently the stealth bomber, apparently over frigate size or in that range, has a bomb with a 14K range, and the damage runs in the single digit thousands with a lot of mod around skills, target size, and all that.
While a super bomb has some cool to it in concept, I do hope to see a "heavy bomber" ship in the future. It's loads of fun delivering love with a stealth bomber but surely something bigger would be more fun.
The trend already exists. There's covops, then black ops, and recon, to the warping cloakies didn't stop at frigate-sized ships, still only one category is capable of "setting them up the bomb".
If the trend for bombers moved along the same lines, maybe we would see a BS-Sized heavy bomber ship someday. Would it have large bombs or multiple launchers?
What role would it have? Such a ship would certainly be good for clearing out bubble camps and mining ops that were too bunched up. I can also see such a ship setting up "fleet firewalls" with staggered fire to keep out drones and smaller ships.
Ah well, whether or not we see that, is not in my power. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
11197
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 15:05:00 -
[13] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:A heavy missile has a yield of 41 kT.
So what's asked for here is a "bigger bomb".
But I think there are a lot of people who can harken back to the days of the old Doomsday Device, and the "Drive-by DD".
So anything that comes even close to it, a "BIG AOE weapon", is going to make people nervous.
Presently the stealth bomber, apparently over frigate size or in that range, has a bomb with a 14K range, and the damage runs in the single digit thousands with a lot of mod around skills, target size, and all that.
While a super bomb has some cool to it in concept, I do hope to see a "heavy bomber" ship in the future. It's loads of fun delivering love with a stealth bomber but surely something bigger would be more fun.
The trend already exists. There's covops, then black ops, and recon, to the warping cloakies didn't stop at frigate-sized ships, still only one category is capable of "setting them up the bomb".
If the trend for bombers moved along the same lines, maybe we would see a BS-Sized heavy bomber ship someday. Would it have large bombs or multiple launchers?
What role would it have? Such a ship would certainly be good for clearing out bubble camps and mining ops that were too bunched up. I can also see such a ship setting up "fleet firewalls" with staggered fire to keep out drones and smaller ships.
Ah well, whether or not we see that, is not in my power.
Such a ship would be even better for gate camping.
1 Kings 12:11
|

Plastic Psycho
Necro-Economics
248
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 15:06:00 -
[14] - Quote
Harry Forever wrote:William Walker wrote:The Tsar bomba had a yield of 50 to 58 megatons of TNT. It was originally constructed to have 100 megatons of TNT. That would have had an estimated destruction radius of 35km.
We already have bombs and they inflict enough damage to small targets and have a radius of 15km. The scale of EVE ships is large already, and creating "mega-bombs" or bombs already bigger than the ones we have now would be an imbalance.
CCP is not here to empower your crusade against nullsec, King Harry Forever of Highsec, first of his name, lord protector of the 4 realms, leader of the anti-nullsec crusade. sure we need it, and the game needs it as well... at the moment the focus is too much on alliances and groups... there are many soloplayers who are able to build up big amount of ISK on their own, but the superweapon to use it is missing if I'm able to build an amount of ISK comparable to a corp, then I want to have a weapon to fight that corp the only balance needs to be the price for the weapon, that can be discussed What you want is a bomb that will not only nuke your opponents' fleet, but will nuke your own fleet as well.
Somehow, I don't think anyone launching those will be very welcome... anywhere. The only real purpose for it would be comedy. It certainly would not serve the purpose you fantisize it might. |

Stitcher
Re-Awakened Technologies Inc
1849
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 15:08:00 -
[15] - Quote
once upon a time, we had the VoE (Volume of Effect) titan Doomsday, which did something like that much damage to everything on the grid. so, the bomb that's being discussed here but with a 500Km radius.
They got rid of it, and for good reason. An in-character blog and a video: http://verinsjournal.blogspot.com http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tu1mbsgo738
|

Plastic Psycho
Necro-Economics
248
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 15:14:00 -
[16] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
If the trend for bombers moved along the same lines, maybe we would see a BS-Sized heavy bomber ship someday. Would it have large bombs or multiple launchers?
Multiple launchers, please. The ability to ripple-fire bombs would make me smile. Like a shark. Especially if you can load one of each type of bomb... 
Of course, that would make Heavy Bombers seriously OP unless you put some crippling gimps on it, too.
|

Azami Nevinyrall
Carbon Circle Tactical Narcotics Team
1101
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 15:18:00 -
[17] - Quote
Harry Forever wrote:William Walker wrote:The Tsar bomba had a yield of 50 to 58 megatons of TNT. It was originally constructed to have 100 megatons of TNT. That would have had an estimated destruction radius of 35km.
We already have bombs and they inflict enough damage to small targets and have a radius of 15km. The scale of EVE ships is large already, and creating "mega-bombs" or bombs already bigger than the ones we have now would be an imbalance.
CCP is not here to empower your crusade against nullsec, King Harry Forever of Highsec, first of his name, lord protector of the 4 realms, leader of the anti-nullsec crusade. sure we need it, and the game needs it as well... at the moment the focus is too much on alliances and groups... there are many soloplayers who are able to build up big amount of ISK on their own, but the superweapon to use it is missing if I'm able to build an amount of ISK comparable to a corp, then I want to have a weapon to fight that corp the only balance needs to be the price for the weapon, that can be discussed And what makes you think that the super powers of EVE won't have 1000+ pilots weilding these weapons.
If you don't think that's possible remember that the CFC had 6 Megathron fleets, 2 Bomber fleets, 1 Fuckyou fleet, 1 loki fleet and a Dreadnaught fleet. Just for that one battle of 6VDT...
I'm currently taking bets on the following: - CCP Games becomes EA Games' property. - EVE Online will have Microtranctions everywhere. |

flakeys
Antwerpse Kerels R O G U E
1302
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 15:21:00 -
[18] - Quote
Harry Forever wrote: if I'm able to build an amount of ISK comparable to a corp, then I want to have a weapon to fight that corp
Uhm harry unlike most of your blocklist and the few not on it i have got to know you because of your thread in market discussion.
You know the one where you where gonna do awsome stuff with procurers.The thread where a crapload of multi-B and multi-T traders told you the flaws of the plan and where you started telling them all how wrong they where and blocking them one by one.
Think i was the first one on that list ... but i know you read it still.You are too self absorbed to not read what others say about your persona.
So , with that in mind i can be quite sure that your big amount of isk will be as much of a succes as your take over of the VFK system .
We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
|

Zimmy Zeta
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
27433
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 15:25:00 -
[19] - Quote
flakeys wrote:Harry Forever wrote:CCP needs to support individuals who want to go big
I'm thinking of a nukebomb at the price of 1 billion
100.000 HP damager on a 40k radius I want an individual nuker too . Costs 100 B but you can nuke one individual into biomass with it and i got just the guy in mind i want to try it on ... can you guess who harry ? Come on , just one try ...
I was suggesting the "Azerothonian Death Beam" a while back in F&I, a weapon that would delete your eve account and start a new WoW account for you immediately after. But you guys didn't like the idea :(
Just think of how bad an average post by me is, and then realize half of them are even worse |

Harry Forever
SpaceJunkys
574
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 15:30:00 -
[20] - Quote
William Walker wrote:The Tsar bomba had a yield of 50 to 58 megatons of TNT. It was originally constructed to have 100 megatons of TNT. That would have had an estimated destruction radius of 35km.
We already have bombs and they inflict enough damage to small targets and have a radius of 15km. The scale of EVE ships is large already, and creating "mega-bombs" or bombs already bigger than the ones we have now would be an imbalance.
CCP is not here to empower your crusade against nullsec, King Harry Forever of Highsec, first of his name, lord protector of the 4 realms, leader of the anti-nullsec crusade.
by the way, the game is already out of balance, what makes it out of balances are those big alliances especially the CFC, you can not fight them anymore with groups and conventional mesures
they suck up all of the playerbase and assimilate them into those mindless creatures, compareable to the borg in Star Trek they are against individualism and therefore need to be fought by individuals
thats why we need terror weapons with devastating impact https:// |

Azami Nevinyrall
Carbon Circle Tactical Narcotics Team
1102
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 15:31:00 -
[21] - Quote
Zimmy Zeta wrote:flakeys wrote:Harry Forever wrote:CCP needs to support individuals who want to go big
I'm thinking of a nukebomb at the price of 1 billion
100.000 HP damager on a 40k radius I want an individual nuker too . Costs 100 B but you can nuke one individual into biomass with it and i got just the guy in mind i want to try it on ... can you guess who harry ? Come on , just one try ... I was suggesting the "Azerothonian Death Beam" a while back in F&I, a weapon that would delete your eve account and start a new WoW account for you immediately after. But you guys didn't like the idea :( That sounds like an awesome idea!
Maybe use it as a gag weapon if anything! I'm currently taking bets on the following: - CCP Games becomes EA Games' property. - EVE Online will have Microtranctions everywhere. |

Plastic Psycho
Necro-Economics
249
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 15:31:00 -
[22] - Quote
Zimmy Zeta wrote:flakeys wrote:Harry Forever wrote:CCP needs to support individuals who want to go big
I'm thinking of a nukebomb at the price of 1 billion
100.000 HP damager on a 40k radius I want an individual nuker too . Costs 100 B but you can nuke one individual into biomass with it and i got just the guy in mind i want to try it on ... can you guess who harry ? Come on , just one try ... I was suggesting the "Azerothonian Death Beam" a while back in F&I, a weapon that would delete your eve account and start a new WoW account for you immediately after. But you guys didn't like the idea :( The WoW account was a bit too much. Biomass? Sure. But WoW...? That's just evil.
|

flakeys
Antwerpse Kerels R O G U E
1304
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 15:31:00 -
[23] - Quote
Zimmy Zeta wrote:flakeys wrote:Harry Forever wrote:CCP needs to support individuals who want to go big
I'm thinking of a nukebomb at the price of 1 billion
100.000 HP damager on a 40k radius I want an individual nuker too . Costs 100 B but you can nuke one individual into biomass with it and i got just the guy in mind i want to try it on ... can you guess who harry ? Come on , just one try ... I was suggesting the "Azerothonian Death Beam" a while back in F&I, a weapon that would delete your eve account and start a new WoW account for you immediately after. But you guys didn't like the idea :(
OK STOP IT , you can take a joke too far ....
We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
|

EvilweaselSA
GoonCorp Goonswarm Federation
987
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 15:32:00 -
[24] - Quote
ccp i have failed miserably at relevance with a group, as nobody will follow me because i am a lunatic spouting retread ideas that have failed over and over again
i have failed miserably solo because im really bad at this game
please give me a cheat code tia that i have not at all thought through and have not at all thought about what the goonies would do with it |

Azami Nevinyrall
Carbon Circle Tactical Narcotics Team
1103
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 15:36:00 -
[25] - Quote
EvilweaselSA wrote:ccp i have failed miserably at relevance with a group, as nobody will follow me because i am a lunatic spouting retread ideas that have failed over and over again
i have failed miserably solo because im really bad at this game
please give me a cheat code tia that i have not at all thought through and have not at all thought about what the goonies would do with it The first step to recovery to admitting you have a problem.
Its good to see you took the first 2 steps by admitting that you have a problem and joined a swarm! I'm currently taking bets on the following: - CCP Games becomes EA Games' property. - EVE Online will have Microtranctions everywhere. |

Zimmy Zeta
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
27440
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 15:39:00 -
[26] - Quote
Harry Forever wrote:William Walker wrote:The Tsar bomba had a yield of 50 to 58 megatons of TNT. It was originally constructed to have 100 megatons of TNT. That would have had an estimated destruction radius of 35km.
We already have bombs and they inflict enough damage to small targets and have a radius of 15km. The scale of EVE ships is large already, and creating "mega-bombs" or bombs already bigger than the ones we have now would be an imbalance.
CCP is not here to empower your crusade against nullsec, King Harry Forever of Highsec, first of his name, lord protector of the 4 realms, leader of the anti-nullsec crusade. by the way, the game is already out of balance, what makes it out of balances are those big alliances especially the CFC, you can not fight them anymore with groups and conventional mesures they suck up all of the playerbase and assimilate them into those mindless creatures, compareable to the Borg in Star Trek they are against individualism and therefore need to be fought by individuals thats why we need terror weapons with devastating impact
Malcanis' first law.
It's always the older, richer and more experienced players who profit most from any changes that were implemented to help newbies.
Even if these weapons were included into the game, exactly like you envision them- the CFC could use them as well, and would do so to a devastating effect.
Just think of how bad an average post by me is, and then realize half of them are even worse |

Metal Icarus
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
599
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 15:40:00 -
[27] - Quote
HEAVY bomb launcher -only can be fitted to black ops (holy ****, a use for the BLOPS besides covert titan!) T1 bombs specialized for capital engagements 100,000 DMG High sig resolution, max damage on carriers dreads T2 bombs specialized for SUPER capital engagements 150,000 DMG Extremely high sig resolution, max damage of Supers 99% resists on its own damage type Smaller damage radius due to stationary targets, maybe 10km radius
a man can dream... |

Solstice Project
I'm So Meta Even This Acronym
3514
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 15:44:00 -
[28] - Quote
Another quality thread.
Of course nobody except the lone solo guy could use and afford this and not the individuals of large alliances who have trillions of isk...
Forum warriors............ |

Zimmy Zeta
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
27446
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 15:48:00 -
[29] - Quote
Solstice Project wrote:Another quality thread.
Of course nobody except the lone solo guy could use and afford this and not the individuals of large alliances who have trillions of isk...
Forum warriors............
wait...I think you are up to something here...
what..listen to me...
what about.....
listen, guys!
What about a weapon that increases damage--- hear me, guys!
--What about a weapon that increases damage in relation to your post count on the forums?
awesome, eh? Just think of how bad an average post by me is, and then realize half of them are even worse |

Harry Forever
SpaceJunkys
575
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 15:49:00 -
[30] - Quote
Zimmy Zeta wrote:Harry Forever wrote:William Walker wrote:The Tsar bomba had a yield of 50 to 58 megatons of TNT. It was originally constructed to have 100 megatons of TNT. That would have had an estimated destruction radius of 35km.
We already have bombs and they inflict enough damage to small targets and have a radius of 15km. The scale of EVE ships is large already, and creating "mega-bombs" or bombs already bigger than the ones we have now would be an imbalance.
CCP is not here to empower your crusade against nullsec, King Harry Forever of Highsec, first of his name, lord protector of the 4 realms, leader of the anti-nullsec crusade. by the way, the game is already out of balance, what makes it out of balances are those big alliances especially the CFC, you can not fight them anymore with groups and conventional mesures they suck up all of the playerbase and assimilate them into those mindless creatures, compareable to the Borg in Star Trek they are against individualism and therefore need to be fought by individuals thats why we need terror weapons with devastating impact Malcanis' first law. It's always the older, richer and more experienced players who profit most from any changes that were implemented to help newbies. Even if these weapons were included into the game, exactly like you envision them- the CFC could use them as well, and would do so to a devastating effect.
you don't get it, they would not use the weapon against an individual like me, its pointless and irrelevant if they have it, its your big fleet thinking where you guys continuosly get stuck... like I said, they sucked out your personality already, you are the swarm... but with that bomb I will bring freedome to you again... trust me https:// |
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |