Sabe
   |
Posted - 2006.01.04 05:54:00 -
[1]
I'm going to be as polite about this.
I won't rehash everything that's been said by so many players about certain missions since RMR release.
I just want to say that you should return all lost ships since RMR was released, and maybe that will teach your developers to be more careful and properly test the missions before releasing them.
Players, please refrain from flaming me about how you are uber and I am not and its my fault for this or that or not equiping correctly or that I shouldnt have been where I was when I was, it serves no purpose and is just your opinion.
CCP, please return my Megathron I lost due to RMR. I have made the petition as requested... now its your turn to stop making excuses and return all our ships. No I am not satisfied.
If you agree with me, have lost a ship due to mission changes in RMR, then please just add your name to the thread and let CCP know how many of us are not happy about this and want our ships returned.
For many of us... its all we have in game wealth from many months even years of playing the game. We paid you plenty of "real" money to play the game and earn these ships and equipment, all I am asking is you return something that doesn't take a "real" penny out of your pockets. I'm not asking for my subscription cost's back... but I will hold out on future ones if need be.
As I said in my emails... one account (My builder/miner alt) is canceled and inactive, the second (My combat alt) runs out in Febuary. Yes I am holding out my future subscription of both accounts in hopes that your personal desire for my measly $30 per month is more important then a simple ship. You can call it blackmail if you want... but I've exhausted all other options, now I make my request public for all to see.
Oh and don't worry, I wont be asking for another one returned if I should lose it a second time... the first time was your fault, losing one a second time on same mission would be mine.
Thank you for reading. Have a nice day. :)
-----
TROLL
One mans "flame" is another mans "constuctive criticism". |