| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Chowdown
   |
Posted - 2006.01.07 18:44:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Chowdown on 07/01/2006 18:44:01
 Originally by: Allan Robertson
This is silly, this guy just wants to force PvP on those who do not want to PvP, I'm not saying PvP is wrong or anything it's a part of the game, but no one should be forced into playing EVE in a way sombody else wants them to and thats final.
I will force myself upon you soon! You like that don't you ..... mmmmmmmm
|
Chowdown
|
Posted - 2006.01.07 18:57:00 -
[2]
|
Chowdown
|
Posted - 2006.01.07 19:15:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Chowdown on 07/01/2006 19:15:44
Originally by: Syrec
Originally by: Bazman
As it is you can sit all day long mining and never be at risk, at all, ever.
There is no risk in hunting defenseless miners, which basicaly throws your argument about risk right out the window.
I said it once and I said it again, you're all complaining about not being able to get free kills. No doubt you are still popping miners and haulers, but apparently every miner should stay in place and bend over to get popped in any system you enter.
Look dude its not like he is trying to take the veld out of Jita, and as such this won't effect you at all. He is refering to the people who live in 0.0. There is of course risk for the people hunting the NPCs. Furthermore he has not suggested they sit still, seriosuly did you read the post! He is suggesting they should not be able to get away with logging in the belts.
|
Chowdown
|
Posted - 2006.01.07 19:19:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Syrec
Originally by: Bazman
lol, way to miss the point of the thread
I already replied to the thread topic. You replied to me, and replied back to you. I'm not sure if you have a problem reading quoted messages, but the message I quoted was yours. When a person types under the quote, it implies that they are replying to the quotes message. Hm, well.. I'm sure there is a forum 101 tutorial out there somewhere for you to read. 
But the ppoint is you utterlyu misinterrupted it, but rather than admit this you have continued to post. As such now everyone things your a blithring fool.
|
Chowdown
|
Posted - 2006.01.07 19:36:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Syrec
Originally by: Hast
the risk in hunting defenseless miners is that they might ACTUALLY HAVE A ESCORT, now thats the risk of it. The deterrent that is a actually good way to keep ebil people as myself is actually having a guard thats bigger then my fleet. But I guess that is too much to ask for since its easier to press the x in the top right corner
Well if they have an escort, they aren't a defenseless miner anymore. Since they are protected they probably aren't going to log out, so you would have no problem.
Yes thats fine, they would still logout, but at least we get to kill the escourt. However it does not change the fact that they need a mining timer.
|
Chowdown
|
Posted - 2006.01.07 21:18:00 -
[6]
Edited by: Chowdown on 07/01/2006 21:19:12
Originally by: Hoshino
LOL well if its not the biggest whiners of all the pirates
Who?
Quote:
You whine about bm you whine about this and that sorry guys but loging is the only defence that solo miners and miners with no corp fleet for protection in deep space have so i fully understand that you want to take that from them
READ THE POST!!!!!!!!! There is no complaint about them login, merely apathetically loginning in the belt. No matter how many [ lol]'s you put after a statement if its nto funny its not funny.
Quote:
So like all you log of pirates and gankers that you guys are do what we cearbears do live with it ok.
Yes we log off with a timer, equality is king.
Quote:
And lets face it hunting miners killing targets that cant realy shoot back you are so lame thats its almost funny but not realy cause its just sad how cool you guys think you are killing stuff that cant kill you back
Whats lame is sitting paying a subscription to stare at an asteriod.
Quote:
start thinking about a way to make this work for you like the cearbear world has done around pirates 
This is the whole point if your read any of the post before this extended rant of dog turd. There is no way around it!
|
Chowdown
|
Posted - 2006.01.07 21:43:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Syrec
Originally by: Chowdown
Whats lame is sitting paying a subscription to stare at an asteriod.
Oh how little you know young padawan. The astroids are an incarnation of death. Lead by the mighty Veldspar race, they have armies in mulitple parts of *every* solar system. If not kept in check they will surely conquer the galaxy and destroy us all.
I stand correct, scratch the mining timer idea, its all been a horrible mistake.
|
Chowdown
|
Posted - 2006.01.09 16:56:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Judas Jones
Pirate/Snipers sit at gates with much inpunity, fitted with WCS and run the first time a hostile fleet looks like its gonna ruin there parade. I do not object to this at all as its part of the game. Yet one cop out tatic is accepted but another is not? Both are designed for self preservation with one key difference, the sniper is looking to kill and PvP gank whereas the miner is not therefor why should the miner be mroe handicaped?
Sorry your example is completely unrelated I never snipe at gates with WCS fitted. However I will hunt miners mining in 0.0 belts. All that is suggested, is that the playing field is levelled. If I shoot at the miner in a belt I am immediatley on a 15min pvp timer. As such the miner should be on a mining timer if mining. This is not going to stop him getting away, its not going to magically hold him in the belt. It is merely gonna stopping him using "logoffski."
However your argument is fundamentally flawed much as I loathe gate snipers. Gate snipers use game mechanics to escape. "Logoffskis" do not.
|
Chowdown
|
Posted - 2006.01.10 13:54:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Gibbah Dibb
I don't have any probs with a timer, but people, listen to your selfves!
Lol, you actually want the gamedevelopers change the game to make it more easy for you to gank a non-hostile un-armed player minding his own business? It's like a little kid squashing ants for fun. Don't you want little bit more challenging targets then that???
The reason 0.0 space exists is too ensure that the game sticks to the fundamental premis that makes it great, non concensual pvp. I honestly worry about the intellect of some of the people who browse the general section of these forums.
|
Chowdown
|
Posted - 2006.01.10 14:11:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Gibbah Dibb
Edited by: Gibbah Dibb on 10/01/2006 14:08:13
Edited by: Gibbah Dibb on 10/01/2006 14:07:45
Originally by: Chowdown
Originally by: Gibbah Dibb
I don't have any probs with a timer, but people, listen to your selfves!
Lol, you actually want the gamedevelopers change the game to make it more easy for you to gank a non-hostile un-armed player minding his own business? It's like a little kid squashing ants for fun. Don't you want little bit more challenging targets then that???
The reason 0.0 space exists is too ensure that the game sticks to the fundamental premis that makes it great, non concensual pvp. I honestly worry about the intellect of some of the people who browse the general section of these forums.
Im sorry, my intellect is obviously not on par with yours. I understand that now. I hope you can forgive me.
Actually I was referring to some of the previous posts. Your although wrong did not smack of stupidity. Consider yourself forgiven tho for your assumption 
|
Chowdown
|
Posted - 2006.01.10 20:41:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Bklyn 1
nothing beats the thrill and adreneline rush of fighting a mining barge!!! once one sent his viscous drones at me and i actually took a point of damage to my shields before i blew him up killing miner's is too hard! we have to find a way to make it easier!!!
Finally someone who gets it. Keep the support rolling in.
|
| |
|