Highsec clearly needs to be made safer, or missions done by 60bil isk ravens need to be buffed to compensate the pilots for their risk

Just made some maths... @550 million per PLEX, we're talking about spending the equivalent to 1,600 euros in a ship + 900 in bounties. Kinda outrageous for some space pixels.

Pertty much this. It's what happens when real life value can be calculated through what it'd cost to replace using an in game method of purchasing ISK.

In this case, the guy was mugged of [if the quote is correct] 1,600 Euros. Ever heard the saying: dont fly what you can't afford to lose? Well, that goes for everyone -10 euros everytime you lose 300m isk. Can everyone afford to just throw 10 euros on pixels?

Clearly a group of players, delighted in stripping this guy of 1600 euros. Wonder if they'd grin from ear to ear if a misc bank transaction took 35 euros of all party members involved and deposited it back to said carebear.. interesting thought..

The post links to a KM

Against forum rules.

OK, so what's the point of having theseships if you cant fly it and show it off in hi-sec?

To put it another way having an over swollen **** is useless if you can't **** her with it.

you can peacock it all you want in space, just don't be surprised when a hunter shoots and stuffs your bird.

Pertty much this. It's what happens when real life value can be calculated through what it'd cost to replace using an in game method of purchasing ISK.

In this case, the guy was mugged of [if the quote is correct] 1,600 Euros. Ever heard the saying: dont fly what you can't afford to lose? Well, that goes for everyone -10 euros everytime you lose 300m isk. Can everyone afford to just throw 10 euros on pixels?

Clearly a group of players, delighted in stripping this guy of 1600 euros. Wonder if they'd grin from ear to ear if a misc bank transaction took 35 euros of all party members involved and deposited it back to said carebear.. interesting thought..

Should went out the window when he hopped in a 44 billion ISK sh*tfit to do missions that is about as efficient as my 0.55 billion ISK Navy Scorpion.

The only reason why that Raven cost 60 bil was because of what players will pay for those modules.

We are the players.

So we are the ones responsible for that Raven costing that much.


It's dumb all around.


Now the question I think of is, were there so much intended botting and nullsec ratting in carriers expected that such a ship would be possible?

So that a ship, the hull costing less than 1 billion, can be equipped to the level of costing 60 billion, is an indication that nullsec may be in need of a loot nerf.

Strangely enough, too much ISK in the game creates the potential for these modules to cost so much, but these modules create the incentive to have so much ISK in the first place.

Thus I would also suspect that being able to NOT engage the Sansha Mothership in highsec incursions and just grind away should also be addressed.

the only safe place is nullsec, invunerable stations and stuff... pewww, its more risk shooting an asteroid in highsec

Most likely another 3 or 4 accounts cancelled due to high sec ganking which translates to less bling in the CCP wallet. I wonder how much high sec ganking is really costing CCP and the game in general.

Most likely another 3 or 4 accounts cancelled due to high sec ganking which translates to less bling in the CCP wallet. I wonder how much high sec ganking is really costing CCP and the game in general.

A high sec mission runner earns enough isk to slap a titans worth of isk into a raven and you demand null be nerfed?

That's possibly the dumbest thing I ever read today.

Isn't it great?

Also, he indicates that 'we the players' influence that market. Personally, I've never done any trade in those sorts of bling modules, so I've never had any influence whatsoever on their prices.

Except the SNI is nowhere near as efficient as the RNI for Lvl 4 PVE.