Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Freakdevil
Aliastra Gallente Federation
60
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 08:29:00 -
[91] - Quote
I think the OP is reading too much into the wording change. New player is written all over the wording. No GM is going to investigate a null sec theft or scam that was conducted in game. Not in a million years. Out of game is something else and not subject to this discussion.
In my opinion, any Vets who spend their time in starter areas need some help. This might be CCP's way of saying that.
DISCLAIMER: That is just my opinion only.
|

DeMichael Crimson
Republic University Minmatar Republic
11211
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 08:30:00 -
[92] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:DeMichael Crimson wrote:Sisters of EVE Arc And? Arnon is already on that list of off limits zones. Unless they're going to set all 20+ systems in that area off limits, it doesn't matter, nor should it. Quote:One thing CCP has made abundantly clear over the years is they are new player friendly and as such, new players are off limits. If you can't get on board with that, then you best look for another game.
Yeah, you know, if I actually like the harsh universe they lauded in all their advertising and stuff, I should just quit. Oh, here's another thing. I habitually put up lowball buy orders for a lot of the Sisters of EVE loot drops in and around Arnon. I guess I should be banned for, and I quote: Quote:Attempting to abuse a new playerGÇÖs lack of knowledge of the game and its mechanic for your personal gain Because screw people who are properly prepared and do their homework, right? [Edit: That kind of crap is why people are pissed off about this broad brush rewording. Because stuff that people have been doing for years with a thumbs up from CCP could reasonably be argued is now bannable. Banning someone for "taking advantage" of people doing that arc (with lowball buy orders) is easily within the wording of that statement. And that's the problem I have with it right there. The entire thing is one huge "moving the goal posts".
Obviously you didn't bother checking the links I included and decided to cherry pick one little specific phrase out of my reply.
All I see here is you pouring a lot of wine with no cheese.
Myriad Blaze wrote:Thank you for this post and the links. When I started reading this thread, that old discussion immediately came to my mind.
Maybe the rules are sometimes vague but in this case they are crystal clear. Nothing changed at all.
Thanks. Guess some people just can't understand.
DMC
|

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
831
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 08:37:00 -
[93] - Quote
Quote:Obviously you didn't bother checking the links I included and decided to cherry pick one little specific phrase out of my reply.
I read them, but they added nothing to your point. In fact, they added credibility to anyone who would care to claim this is the latest in another set of nerfs to add more safety to highsec.
Like, you know, me. But if you'd actually like to have the debate, instead of just bemoaning "this topic again!?", then I'd be happy to discuss this with you. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |

Alice Saki
Mind Games. Suddenly Spaceships.
87392
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 08:38:00 -
[94] - Quote
If you can't Hack Eves Darkness it's not for you.
Stop the baby sitting.
|

embrel
BamBam Inc.
56
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 08:57:00 -
[95] - Quote
to me this as well as the TOS rewording seem like the work of a new attorney who's counseling CCP. One who doesn't know much about the actual game. Of course it's not okay to grief newbs, most of us get that. However, to have terms that are vague at best is not the way to go with Eve. I know that lawyers sometimes like vague clauses as they provide the freedom for interpretation. This does not work in a game where half the content is about "criminal activities". Here you simply need to know precisely what's ok and what's not. The system rule with noobs was precise. It's no longer precise now. Also, dear CCP, the vagueness of clauses can be used against you. Ok, possibly no one will sue you if they feel you violated the TOS, but basically you're bound too by the TOS. So you at least should know what they actually say. |

DeMichael Crimson
Republic University Minmatar Republic
11213
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 09:32:00 -
[96] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Quote:Obviously you didn't bother checking the links I included and decided to cherry pick one little specific phrase out of my reply.
I read them, but they added nothing to your point. In fact, they added credibility to anyone who would care to claim this is the latest in another set of nerfs to add more safety to highsec. Like, you know, me. But if you'd actually like to have the debate, instead of just bemoaning "this topic again!?", then I'd be happy to discuss this with you. I highly doubt you read those links. Those links basically contained about 52 pages of posted replies with 20 replies per page. Within those pages are multiple GM and Dev responses pertaining to issues which are now being brought up in this thread.
I'm not gonna debate anything since there's nothing to debate. CCP said "Do Not Mess With New Players". Meaning do not gank, scam, grief, bait, harass, etc. They also gave a reason for making that list of systems.
Posted: 2012.06.13 10:39
Quote:GM Homonoia wrote: Tl;dr We are extending our rookie griefing rules to the system of Arnon. See our wiki page on this subject: http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Rookie_SystemsHistory lesson A long long time ago in a galaxy right here in the EVE universe we had a lot of new players who undocked for the very first time and were trying to figure out how to fly their ships. There was also a small group of players that wanted to pad their kill mails in the easiest way possible by preying upon those people who had not yet found the trigger to their civilian guns. This last group moved into the rookie starter systems and started killing our new recruits. This is not cool and so us game masters decided that messing with these newest and most helpless players was not allowed. A ban was put into place for griefing rookies in their starter systems. Of course, these predators decided that rules should be followed to the letter and the spirit behind these rules can be ignored at will and moved to the career agent systems to do the exact same thing. Unfortunately this forced us to extend the ban on griefing rookies to these systems as well. Present day Now these scavengers of corpses have moved to the Sisters of EVE epic arc systems to do the exact same thing once again. This is forcing us to extend this ban to the Arnon system as well. Let me state very clearly that we do so with great reluctance. We do NOT like to impose rules and limitations like these upon the sandbox and we do not do so lightly. These measures are always debated hotly within our department and can often take multiple months of deliberation to make absolutely sure we are doing the right thing. Let me state this very clearly here. We do NOT want experienced players to mess with rookies barely a week in. We are sure that you have worthier targets than these players who are still learning the ropes. If this behavior does not stop we may extend this rule to all systems that are covered in the Sisters of EVE epic arc. These systems are: - Tar - Harerget - Hatakani - Hek - Lustrevik - Tanoo - Lisudeh - Sosh - Manarq - Chainelant Senior GM Homonoia | Info Group | Senior Game Master I think that basically explains everything pertaining to the list.
Now about this :
embrel wrote:to me this as well as the TOS rewording seem like the work of a new attorney who's counseling CCP. One who doesn't know much about the actual game. Of course it's not okay to grief newbs, most of us get that. However, to have terms that are vague at best is not the way to go with Eve. I know that lawyers sometimes like vague clauses as they provide the freedom for interpretation. This does not work in a game where half the content is about "criminal activities". Here you simply need to know precisely what's ok and what's not. The system rule with noobs was precise. It's no longer precise now. Also, dear CCP, the vagueness of clauses can be used against you. Ok, possibly no one will sue you if they feel you violated the TOS, but basically you're bound too by the TOS. So you at least should know what they actually say.
Posted: 2012.04.26 20:13
Quote:GM Homonoia wrote: Some rules are vague on purpose and they will remain vague. This is the 'reckless driving' equivalent. If I define the rules to the last dot someone will simply find a loop hole and use it. The rule is "do not mess with rookies", and if you are in doubt the answer is ALWAYS 'do not do it'.
Senior GM Homonoia | Info Group | Senior Game Master
There it is. I guess History does indeed repeat itself. All of this has already been discussed time and time again. Basically it all boils down to CCP and the GM's. It's their game and remember, according to the TOS any account can be terminated at any time for any reason whatsoever..
DMC |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
832
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 09:35:00 -
[97] - Quote
Quote:I highly doubt you read those links. Those links basically contained about 52 pages of posted replies with 20 replies per page. Within those pages are multiple GM and Dev responses pertaining to issues which are now being brought up in this thread.
I did, actually. Skimmed over the big one, but the one in which the OP was deleted by a mod was kind of funny.
So, again, are you actually adding anything here, or just bemoaning "not this topic again!?" Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |

Grinder2210
Corporation 310526
22
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 11:05:00 -
[98] - Quote
Most of this Stuff has been covered before but the pages you linked are all old
I think its great thay finely reworded the Rookie System rules to be more up to date with the new Agresstion system HowEver Rookie to New Player ? People can be Have action taken aganced them anywere ?
These thing have not been covered in the past And need A GM responce that is uptodate
|

Tron 3K
Ship Spinning Industries
88
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 11:28:00 -
[99] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:Tron 3K wrote:embrel wrote:how long is a player considered a rookie?
^this... dumb rules are dumb.. So long as the GM decides you are using unfairly deceptive or overwhelming ways to abuse new players just for kicks. Repeatedly suicide ganking a month-old character inside his level 1 missions will get you in trouble. Killing a two day old newb running around lowsec in a cruiser is fine. It's up to the GM ultimately. Why not go pick on someone who's already hooked onto Eve and has some chance to at least know what's going on? Not only is it more sporting and fair than sucker-punching people who don't even know how to align to empty space, but you'd also not be hurting Eve as a game and community by giving newcomers a chance to adapt. Yes, the rules are subjective. But if you're concerned about a GM getting involved, then the GM should probably be involved. In other words, HTFU, GTFO, or a GM will make you.
Wait you are telling me to HTFU when you are all for newbies being invulnerable? Please.. Grow a pair and you HTFU.. I dont' scam nor kill newbies I'm just saying when you start putting restrictions in a game that should have very little to none it isn't the same game we all started playing. |

Rico Minali
The Straw Men
1327
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 11:35:00 -
[100] - Quote
Grow a pair and don't pick on new players? Trust me, I almost know what I'm doing. |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
2771
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 12:53:00 -
[101] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
And people tell me that it's too complicated, too much math, takes too long to get good at it, etc.
And that's the best thing about EVE. I'ts exclusive. CCP should make a mass appeal game (that can be it's new cash cow) rather than gimp EVE to the point of averageness.
Little by little, the forces of "meh" are advancing and the forces of "wow, this is actually a quaility game" are getting jobs with outfits called Riot and such.
|
|

GM Spiral
Game Masters C C P Alliance
149

|
Posted - 2013.09.12 13:09:00 -
[102] - Quote
Let us see if we can not clarify a few points.
- First of all, it is correct that the old phrasing of the warning on the Rookie Systems article was very outdated and in need of an update to reflect the current reality of EVE Online. The current wording will hopefully survive a fair few expansions more. We consider the terms "rookie" and "new player" to be interchangeable.
- "Pilots found to pursue activities against new players in other areas may be subject to further restrictions as deemed necessary by CCP Games Customer Support Team."
We understand that this is causing some level of concern. This should only ever be applicable to those that have been found to be serious repeat offenders to the overall policy. Such an individual may be directed by customer support to cease all hostilities against new players (or rookies), enforced through section 6 of the Terms of Service. "Pursuing activities against" is not the occasional gank or target of opportunity outside of rookie systems.
- "I "accidentally" shot a rookie in or near a rookie system. Will I get banned?"
No. If it is happening regularly we may have a word with you. It is exceedingly rare that someone is banned outright. Please do remember that in any case you may always request a review of a warning or a ban applied against your accounts.
- "My enemy is making rookie alts and harassing me into shooting them. Will I get banned for attacking them?"
No (at least not outside rookie systems). Should a warning or ban have been placed in such a situation for any reason, you can and absolutely should contest that. Customer support does not look kindly upon being manipulated against its own customers.
- "One of our wartargets include some newer players. Will we get in trouble for shooting them?"
Generally, no. Rookies contacting us with concerns in this regard will in most cases be directed to rejoin NPC corporations so that they may complete their tutorials and career missions in relative peace. Camping a station in a rookie system for rookie war targets may result in accidents involving other rookie pilots so we do not recommend doing so and may cause us to have a word with you.
- There is very little reason for a veteran player of any age to stay in rookie systems for any reason. Particularly for "station games" or other activity involving suspect timers and such. "It is coming straight for us!" will not work as reason to blow up a rookie that just got himself flagged. It will very quickly become evident to us if someone is making a habit of this, even across multiple characters and or accounts.
- You can always appeal a ban or a warning against your accounts for any reason.
Senior Game Master | CCP Games Customer Support Team
Helping capsuleers since 2004. |
|
|

CCP Falcon
3997

|
Posted - 2013.09.12 13:12:00 -
[103] - Quote
Now that this has been clarified, this thread is being closed, given the volatile nature of a lot of the discussion posted here and the number of posts that have had to be deleted.
If you have any further concerns with regards to rookie harassment, please file a support ticket under the correct category.
Locked. CCP Falcon -á || -á EVE Community Team -á || -á EVE Illuminati -á || -á Live Events Organizer
@CCP_Falcon -á || -á-á@EVE_LiveEvents |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |