| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Gronsak
|
Posted - 2006.01.14 15:19:00 -
[1]
Originally by: Bazman Your thinking of Void ammo :P
Null does: +25% Optimal, +25% Falloff, with a damage total of 44 (Like EMP) but with the gigantic damage mod on blasters, well...
the thing is its 10% leses DPS then antimatter. its half the tracking. and its t2 ammo
use antimatter sub 10km. use null 10-15km. u take a DPS hit but it allows u to hit upto 15km. but like u said its pretty expensive and with a rof of like 3sec its gona cost a lot. perhaps 80*7*3000 = 1.7mils to fill 7 guns. which is pretty pricy. and the ammo wount sell for much less then 3k a pop cos of such high bpo prices.
but it is nice for the 10-17.5km fights
|

Gronsak
|
Posted - 2006.01.14 15:21:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Sarmaul
Originally by: Bazman Your thinking of Void ammo :P
Null does: +25% Optimal, +25% Falloff, with a damage total of 44 (Like EMP) but with the gigantic damage mod on blasters, well...
oops clicked on the wrong one :)
in that case, NERF!!!
sub 10km antimatter is better, 2x tracking and 10% more dmg
from 10-18km antimatter misses a lot so the t2 ammo is better. but at that range things cant be webbed so tracking is important.
as far as i can see it, its good for anti BS from 10-18km and maybe anti BC. but not a lot more then that
|

Gronsak
|
Posted - 2006.01.14 15:24:00 -
[3]
Originally by: FiGHT XZen cool ammo, remove post unless you want it to get hit with nerfbat!
its unlikely to be nerfed
under 10km it is 100% better to use antimatter. more tracking, more dmg and cheap.
from 10-18km this ammo would be usefull: but it has less dmg and half the tracking. so only anti BS and BC.
its nice ammo and has its uses but its pretty specific at what its good at
|

Gronsak
|
Posted - 2006.01.14 15:25:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Sarmaul
exactly, there's a chance you might get 3 shots on my ac pest NERF!!
lol
|

Gronsak
|
Posted - 2006.01.14 15:32:00 -
[5]
Originally by: El Yatta
Originally by: Gronsak
Originally by: FiGHT XZen cool ammo, remove post unless you want it to get hit with nerfbat!
its unlikely to be nerfed
under 10km it is 100% better to use antimatter. more tracking, more dmg and cheap.
from 10-18km this ammo would be usefull: but it has less dmg and half the tracking. so only anti BS and BC.
its nice ammo and has its uses but its pretty specific at what its good at
NULL does NOT reduce tracking, kid.
*******s ur right
meh its still less dmg then antimatter and t2 makes it expensive
|

Gronsak
|
Posted - 2006.01.14 15:56:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Bazman 44 instead of 48 damage i can live with, especially on neutrons, the damage mod makes it stupidly powerful anyway ;)
44*10*7/4.7 = 655 DPS [quick guestimate calculation with maxed skills -2%]
655DPS useing guns at 11.5km optimal and 12km falloff. so at 24km half ur DPS is gone. so keep it to 18km and only 20% of ur DPS is gone
so max DPS x range is 655DPS at 11-12km useing neutrons [good luck to u fitting 7 neutrons and a mwd/ab]
now anyone wanna do a raven DPS useing t1 ammo? cos i know its more then 655DPS and range is many times more.
its definitly not overpowered imo.
|

Gronsak
|
Posted - 2006.01.14 16:01:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Sarmaul Neutron Blaster II with Null L on a Megathron (with maxed skills)
8.302x damage mod 5.67s rof 11.250km optimal 15.625km falloff
DPS on a megathron: (44 * 8.302 * 7) / 5.67 = 450dps.
Optimal + Falloff: 26.875km. Approx DPS: 225dps Optimal + Falloff * 2: 42.500km. Approx DPS: 0
thanks sarm was trying to do this but u beat me to it and did it better :)
|

Gronsak
|
Posted - 2006.01.14 16:14:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Bazman
I've got a neutronathron right now with an MWD, granted i've had to give up on any kind of tank whatsoever, but hey, combined arms tactics and all that. /me is just happy that blasters are fairly useful now
cpu mod?
and a no tank at all blasterthron will die very fast to most ships in game.
|

Gronsak
|
Posted - 2006.01.14 16:15:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Sarmaul Edited by: Sarmaul on 14/01/2006 16:12:44 800mm Autocannon II with EMP L on a Tempest (assuming max skills)
4.566x damage mod 3.04s ROF 3km optimal 20km falloff
DPS on a tempest: (4.566 * 46 * 5) / 3.04 = 345dps
Optimal + Falloff: 23km. Approx DPS: 172.5 Optimal + Falloff * 2: 43km. Approx DPS: 0
Yes, that means a megathron with Null L outdamages a tempest with EMP at every range.
whats wrong with that, ur compairing t2 ammo with t1 ammo. where ofcourse the t2 should be better then the t1
|

Gronsak
|
Posted - 2006.01.14 16:22:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Maya Rkell
Originally by: Gronsak Edited by: Gronsak on 14/01/2006 16:16:23
Originally by: Sarmaul Edited by: Sarmaul on 14/01/2006 16:12:44 800mm Autocannon II with EMP L on a Tempest (assuming max skills)
4.566x damage mod 3.04s ROF 3km optimal 20km falloff
DPS on a tempest: (4.566 * 46 * 5) / 3.04 = 345dps
Optimal + Falloff: 23km. Approx DPS: 172.5 Optimal + Falloff * 2: 43km. Approx DPS: 0
Yes, that means a megathron with Null L outdamages a tempest with EMP at every range.
whats wrong with that, ur compairing t2 ammo with t1 ammo. where ofcourse the t2 should be better then the t1
I disagree. Why SHOULD it do more damage? That's the job of faction amo. T2 amo should do T1 damage, but with secondary effects.
This thread shows how uber some amo is. Ugh.
it does less dmg then antimatter
it just gets a range bonous ie secondary effect.
btw most t2 ammo is more dmg but with penaltys
|

Gronsak
|
Posted - 2006.01.14 17:05:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Ithildin
Originally by: Sarmaul <...> Yes, that means a megathron with Null L outdamages a tempest with EMP at every range.
edit: and also moves faster due to the mwd vs ab
I am a bit interested how you figured this last one out. I know that the tightest spot on a Megathron is it's CPU. 800mm Repeating Artillery II uses 183 powergrid and 32 cpu less than a Neutron Blaster Cannon II Megathron.
The difference in fitting between a Megathron and a Tempest is that the Megathron has -1 Med and +1 low as well as +1 turret -2 launchers. Convievably, the Tempest should be able to offset the damage difference versus the Megathron with the medium powered slot for an electronic warfare module (that it should have CPU for given the intial 216 less CPU taken up on the Tempest compared to an equally fitted Megathron)
Once you factor in that the Tempest has a lower signature radius and the capacity of fitting two NOS or maybe two launchers (or a combination), the Tempest will have it's factual damage increased (maybe not with 100 dps, but all the same) as well as suffer less severe hits and hits of lessened quality. This may not seem like much, but the difference is there.
Adding in sweeter damage type, which can be estimated for increasing the comparable damage by 5% to even as much as 20% in the Tempest's favour (depending on hardeners) on any given target. I shouldn't think such a minor matter as slightly lower dps to be something to proclaim the Tempest beaten. In fact, I'd put my money on the Tempest. I'd even fly a Tempest myself, if I hadn't taken a solemn vow never to train Minmatar or Caldari skills further than was absolutely necessary (until I gain a Gallente or Amarr looking pirate faction ship, neither race will be necessary).
Yes, I am the only one in MC who chooses ships because of looks as much as performance.
P.S. I seem to have missed my original point. The Tempest will move faster because it won't struggle as much to fit an MWD where the Megathron will.
P.P.S. The Null L ammo is listed to have "-100%" capacitor bonus in Jide's extract. Void L, for an energy expensive example, has "+25%". Is that -100% an elimination of capacitor use, or is it one more example of the odd truncating error in extract information? (which would mean capacitor need is reduced by only 1%, as seen on the active hardeners)
OMG STFU taht would mean that the tempest is competitive or even better then the megathron at close range. id rather show u a pure DPS graph of neutrons vs 800s to get my point across without having to show u that i have an extra high slot free and that my setup is so easy to fit whereas ur one is impossible
and i hope there are not many pilots like u out there that look at more then DPS graphs cos if there is im stuff and i wount get a large autocannon boost ARRRGGGGGG
                    
|
| |
|