| Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Capt 69
   |
Posted - 2006.01.15 20:25:00 -
[1]
Capt 69's Ferox vs crzycnck2's Brutix
Fairly long fight resulting in crzycnck2 warping away from the battlefield. Two other BA peeps in system and they didnt try and gank me, so good job to them.
Gf fella.
|
Shin Ra
|
Posted - 2006.01.15 20:34:00 -
[2]
The BA guy warped out of a 1v1?
|
MadGaz
|
Posted - 2006.01.15 20:35:00 -
[3]
How come you're in a npc corp?
------------------------------------------
Moderator ego size too large, please resize. Maximum ego size is 24000km -Oiri Yusko |
Capt 69
|
Posted - 2006.01.15 20:38:00 -
[4]
 Originally by: Shin Ra
The BA guy warped out of a 1v1?
yeah he warped out.
|
Shin Ra
|
Posted - 2006.01.15 20:41:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Capt 69
Originally by: Shin Ra
The BA guy warped out of a 1v1?
yeah he warped out.
Interesting.
|
Evil Edna
|
Posted - 2006.01.15 20:55:00 -
[6]
suprised he didnt have the rest of his corp logon and warp to the fight tbh
kr0m killboard
In game channel kr0m-public |
Capt 69
|
Posted - 2006.01.15 20:58:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Evil Edna
suprised he didnt have the rest of his corp logon and warp to the fight tbh
There were two peeps in his corp in system, and it didnt happen, so props for that I guess
|
Blind Fear
|
Posted - 2006.01.15 21:06:00 -
[8]
IMO if you go into a 1v1 without a scrambler you dont deserve a kill. As long as he didnt fit WCS for a 1v1, I dont see the problem.
------------------------------------------------
Derailing threads with logic since 1992 |
Dash Ripcock
|
Posted - 2006.01.15 21:44:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Evil Edna
suprised he didnt have the rest of his corp logon and warp to the fight tbh
Evil Edna - until you have evidence to prove we use these so-called 'Log On' tactics, please refrain from throwing the notion around. Frankly it's insulting - this corporation was not built on the use of out-of-game mechanics. The simple fact of the matter is: Our Intel and Recon > yours.
As for the original poster, if you challenge someone to a one on one then fail to attach a scrambler and/or webifier to your ship, don't expect to kill anything. Our pilots are honourable and fight true, but they are not stupid. I certainly wouldn't expect one of our guys to fly into a certain death if he could avoid it.
Movie Trailer |
Capt 69
|
Posted - 2006.01.15 21:55:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Dash Ripcock
Originally by: Evil Edna
suprised he didnt have the rest of his corp logon and warp to the fight tbh
Evil Edna - until you have evidence to prove we use these so-called 'Log On' tactics, please refrain from throwing the notion around. Frankly it's insulting - this corporation was not built on the use of out-of-game mechanics. The simple fact of the matter is: Our Intel and Recon > yours.
As for the original poster, if you challenge someone to a one on one then fail to attach a scrambler and/or webifier to your ship, don't expect to kill anything. Our pilots are honourable and fight true, but they are not stupid. I certainly wouldn't expect one of our guys to fly into a certain death if he could avoid it.
I wasn't asking him to, and no smack was intended.
However, in the forum post where he agreed to the 1 on 1 we both agreed on no ew, and fight to the death. He attempted to use EW, then warped away. Enough said i think.
|
Shin Ra
|
Posted - 2006.01.15 21:59:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Capt 69
Originally by: Dash Ripcock
Originally by: Evil Edna
suprised he didnt have the rest of his corp logon and warp to the fight tbh
Evil Edna - until you have evidence to prove we use these so-called 'Log On' tactics, please refrain from throwing the notion around. Frankly it's insulting - this corporation was not built on the use of out-of-game mechanics. The simple fact of the matter is: Our Intel and Recon > yours.
As for the original poster, if you challenge someone to a one on one then fail to attach a scrambler and/or webifier to your ship, don't expect to kill anything. Our pilots are honourable and fight true, but they are not stupid. I certainly wouldn't expect one of our guys to fly into a certain death if he could avoid it.
I wasn't asking him to, and no smack was intended.
However, in the forum post where he agreed to the 1 on 1 we both agreed on no ew, and fight to the death. He attempted to use EW, then warped away. Enough said i think.
TBH, you need to give us a play by play description of what happened rather than jsut saying he attempted to use EW and ran.
|
Capt 69
|
Posted - 2006.01.15 22:17:00 -
[12]
Originally by: Shin Ra
Originally by: Capt 69
Originally by: Dash Ripcock
Originally by: Evil Edna
suprised he didnt have the rest of his corp logon and warp to the fight tbh
Evil Edna - until you have evidence to prove we use these so-called 'Log On' tactics, please refrain from throwing the notion around. Frankly it's insulting - this corporation was not built on the use of out-of-game mechanics. The simple fact of the matter is: Our Intel and Recon > yours.
As for the original poster, if you challenge someone to a one on one then fail to attach a scrambler and/or webifier to your ship, don't expect to kill anything. Our pilots are honourable and fight true, but they are not stupid. I certainly wouldn't expect one of our guys to fly into a certain death if he could avoid it.
I wasn't asking him to, and no smack was intended.
However, in the forum post where he agreed to the 1 on 1 we both agreed on no ew, and fight to the death. He attempted to use EW, then warped away. Enough said i think.
TBH, you need to give us a play by play description of what happened rather than jsut saying he attempted to use EW and ran.
We agreed a set of rules: no EW, no bs's, and to the death, i came into local, he found a safe, asked me to warp to him, i warped in at 40km, he jammed me, i asked wtf he was doing and got outa there, he re-read post, refit, we fought again, i stripped down his drones, beat his tank and when he got to ~ 10% armor he warped out.
|
pshepherd
|
Posted - 2006.01.15 23:07:00 -
[13]
sounds like a smart guy,
if your not going to win a fight, why continue?
==============
This is a sig |
Destiny Defined
|
Posted - 2006.01.15 23:08:00 -
[14]
erm.... sorry i dont see the real significance of this?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Lifes a waste of time .... and times a waste of life........ So get wasted all the time and have the time of your life! |
Capt 69
|
Posted - 2006.01.15 23:21:00 -
[15]
Originally by: pshepherd
sounds like a smart guy,
if your not going to win a fight, why continue?
Compleatly agree, its just a continuation of a post in another section of the forums that got locked for being in the wrong place.
|
Durethia
|
Posted - 2006.01.15 23:54:00 -
[16]
Originally by: Blind Fear
IMO if you go into a 1v1 without a scrambler you dont deserve a kill. As long as he didnt fit WCS for a 1v1, I dont see the problem.
I used to setup for an all-in-one gig. Webber, Scram, tank, firepower... Makes little sense now that I have been playing a little. I still use a webber, to slow down fast orbiting hostiles. But, I've recently dissed the scram becuase of two things... that slot can go towards a cap recharger, target disruptor or some other module that is better suited for keeping you alive. Secondly, most of my setups aren't for tackling and as far as I'm concerned the first to pop or warp away is the loser. It's just that warping away isn't formally recorded but conceptually the target must have had good reason to forfeit his ground and bail; I think the most often reason is he feels he can not win.
It all depends on the situation really, with the best way to fit your ship. Currently, it's not a luxury of mine to freely fly solo and waste time trying to solo-gank poor saps in roid belts. So I must fit in the most offensive/defensive manner and in a team oriented sense, this means to rely on someone else to have the scrammer just as they might rely on me to be fitted complimentary.
Besides there's ways around not having a scram. My first kill in a low-sec belt involved slamming my target into the asteroid and hitting them with everything. This was the only thing I could think of to keep the target from warping, since at the time, I didn't have the skills to use a warp disruptor.
|
Shin Ra
|
Posted - 2006.01.15 23:57:00 -
[17]
Originally by: pshepherd
sounds like a smart guy,
if your not going to win a fight, why continue?
because it was a pre-arranged 1v1, to the death?
|
Evil Edna
|
Posted - 2006.01.16 00:01:00 -
[18]
that'll be battle angels sense of honour then
kr0m killboard
In game channel kr0m-public |
Joshua Izblind
|
Posted - 2006.01.16 00:03:00 -
[19]
Have more Scouts and Covert Ops alts then players online 4tw..and U WONDER y we beat teh 20.000 k people on Tranq?
BA 4tw. 
-----------------------------------------------
|
F0RTISE
|
Posted - 2006.01.16 00:05:00 -
[20]
"there was a 1v1, one dude warped out"
i just hope word gets to the terminally ill before its too late...
---
i dont pirate, im just a woman in a permenantly bad mood. |
Kodos
|
Posted - 2006.01.16 00:20:00 -
[21]
Originally by: Shin Ra
Originally by: pshepherd
sounds like a smart guy,
if your not going to win a fight, why continue?
because it was a pre-arranged 1v1, to the death?
It didn't state to the death, only HAC or below and no EW.
I will take this opportunity to apologise for my corp mate using EW in the original engagement, he must have missed reading that bit of the request. I personally didn't know about the request until after the 1v1 had taken place, or this would not have happened.
As a corporation Battle Angels Inc. does not often give out 1v1 requests or accept them, but when one takes place we honour it completely. I will personally make sure this doesn't happen again, if it does then that member will be kicked from the corporation.
Battle Angels Killboard |
hylleX
|
Posted - 2006.01.16 00:44:00 -
[22]
Edited by: hylleX on 16/01/2006 00:47:05
I strongly remember a 1v1 i had with a senior member in your corp, Kodos. I invited him to a planet i was in af, and had spoted him in enyo at a gate, so when he decides to show up its in a Raven. This was pre missile nerf and so on so kinda screwed. BAPWN well i never thought highly of the corp, That and the tactics u used well kinda lame.
So dont talk lies but maybe Kodos never told u about it.
Well kids you've tried your best and failed miserably, the lesson is: never try
|
Capt 69
|
Posted - 2006.01.16 00:46:00 -
[23]
Originally by: Kodos
Originally by: Shin Ra
Originally by: pshepherd
sounds like a smart guy,
if your not going to win a fight, why continue?
because it was a pre-arranged 1v1, to the death?
It didn't state to the death, only HAC or below and no EW.
I will take this opportunity to apologise for my corp mate using EW in the original engagement, he must have missed reading that bit of the request. I personally didn't know about the request until after the 1v1 had taken place, or this would not have happened.
As a corporation Battle Angels Inc. does not often give out 1v1 requests or accept them, but when one takes place we honour it completely. I will personally make sure this doesn't happen again, if it does then that member will be kicked from the corporation.
Well as far as i'm concerned, no running means a fight to the death:
Quote:
Hac or below, i.e.no bs's, no EW, no running, and no smack?
in this post:
Linkage
Anyways, i think he did the smart thing. Its just from a corp whose giving us grief for running from a fight it seems a little ironic is all.
|
Evil Edna
|
Posted - 2006.01.16 00:47:00 -
[24]
less ironic, more hypocritical
kr0m killboard
In game channel kr0m-public |
Shin Ra
|
Posted - 2006.01.16 00:58:00 -
[25]
Originally by: Capt 69
After my previous "money over honour" posts i have my doubts, but wtf, its only a ferox, omw.
Can we agree:
Hac or below, i.e.no bs's, no EW, no running, and no smack?
No running means no running. Your pilot ran.....
You should apologise for this too.
|
Kodos
|
Posted - 2006.01.16 01:06:00 -
[26]
Originally by: hylleX
Edited by: hylleX on 16/01/2006 00:47:05
I strongly remember a 1v1 i had with a senior member in your corp, Kodos. I invited him to a planet i was in af, and had spoted him in enyo at a gate, so when he decides to show up its in a Raven. This was pre missile nerf and so on so kinda screwed. BAPWN well i never thought highly of the corp, That and the tactics u used well kinda lame.
So dont talk lies but maybe Kodos never told u about it.
I remember this, no I havn't told anyone - because it is not completely true. It was not an arranged 1v1, I had already docked and changed to my raven having seen you and another pilot from your corp in local, leaving me thinking you were bait for him. So, I was in my raven, and you said you were at PX - I warp in and kill you, not once did I agree to a 1v1.
Battle Angels Killboard |
Kodos
|
Posted - 2006.01.16 01:08:00 -
[27]
Edited by: Kodos on 16/01/2006 01:08:43
Originally by: Shin Ra
Originally by: Capt 69
After my previous "money over honour" posts i have my doubts, but wtf, its only a ferox, omw.
Can we agree:
Hac or below, i.e.no bs's, no EW, no running, and no smack?
No running means no running. Your pilot ran.....
You should apologise for this too.
The pilot has been made well aware of his mistakes, and they will not be repeated. I will not apologise any further, this is down to the pilot in question. I will not make any further comments on this situation.
Battle Angels Killboard |
Megadon
|
Posted - 2006.01.16 01:08:00 -
[28]
Is this some kind of goofy court room where PvP fights are evaluated or something? I mean wtf? Just curious...
"The Battleships is and should be a solo pwnmobile." - Oveur
|
Chain Gang
|
Posted - 2006.01.16 01:15:00 -
[29]
You declare war on the ISS .....
then
post rather "sad" results and then 80% of you corp runs to a noob corp ....
Enough said .... lmao
|
Capt 69
|
Posted - 2006.01.16 01:25:00 -
[30]
Originally by: Chain Gang
You declare war on the ISS .....
then
post rather "sad" results and then 80% of you corp runs to a noob corp ....
Enough said .... lmao
POST >>>> WITH <<<< YOUR >>>> MAIN <<<
and no we didn't dec ISS, sheesh, reading the posts ftw
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |