Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Satav
Latinum Exports
77
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 18:46:00 -
[151] - Quote
Levija Saplina wrote:this is ridiculous.
so i am going to let two of my accounts go unsubed.
do something CCP.
Translation:
"I actually have to pay for my accounts because i can't make enough isk! **** this!"
_______________________________________________________________________________
"Your Erebus is docked? How the hell did that happen?" "It took a lot of pushing and grease........." |

Cypermethren
Hardcore p0wnography Cascade Probable
35
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 19:19:00 -
[152] - Quote
Tenchi Sal wrote:classic case of inflation. eve has no real isk sinks. its only going to go higher. deal with it.
First REAL reason that i have ever seen someone give (even if by mistake) as to why there either needs to be more people out in 0.0 or they need to attach leeches to people whom live in highsec's wallets (Isk sinks up the wazoo - Sov, Sov Upgrades, Pos's and their fuel, Rent, ship replacement because you loose at least 5 a day if you dont sit in station all day and go out and pvp like a drunken man with no fear.... i could go on..)
But honestly....
Here's how you afford to play eve.
You get a maccas meal or take out meal multiple times a week yes? Decent meal is about $7-10 yea?
Cut out two takeout meals from you're weekly diet, put money into eve subscription.
You need to loose weight anyway, fatties.
oh oh oh, i might have come to an idea as to why there's so much inflation.
With CCP giving more resources back to eve, they may actualy have people working at the Bot Hunting department rather than an answering machine and have been weeding out the botters etc.
Those things, believe it or not, were a prime reason prices are low, as they're contributing a huge ammount of it purely becuase they're 23/7 all 365 days of the year.
Economy is slowly slowing down and prices going up as supply is starting to not meet demand? |

Twisted Alice
Twisted Universe
25
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 19:35:00 -
[153] - Quote
Kengutsi Akira wrote:Twisted Alice wrote:Levija Saplina wrote:this is ridiculous.
so i am going to let two of my accounts go unsubed.
do something CCP. If CCP interfere they're ruining the so called sandbox. It's just market forces at work, let them work. Ironically, this is why they cant do anything about suicide ganking, the Goons, or a lot of other things as well roflmao. Way to paint yourselves into a corner!
As I don't really care about the Goons or ganking, I don't see how I'm painting myself into a corner.
However, there should be no insurance payout on ships destroyed by Concord.
It's not just the Goons that are at fault anyway, it's people that gank with the intent to grief. But ganking in itself is not necessarily a major problem.
But anyway, Skyrim comes out on the 11th and my accounts already unsubbed. SWTOR in December and hopeful GW2 next year.
So I've decided I won't be back anyway.
I've only been ganked twice in all the time I've played and that was a couple of years ago and both times they lost anyway.
|

Taedrin
Kushan Industrial
135
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 19:51:00 -
[154] - Quote
Ruah Piskonit wrote:Ender Black wrote: Subscriber X is handicapped and can't work therefore not having much left over cash. He does have time to grind missions or incursions with friends. Subscriber Y is a 45-60 hour a week worker who doesn't have much time to earn ISK to pay for his play style. Subscriber X purchases game time from Subscriber Y using ISK as the currency. Where does CCP not get money in this?
that is broken logic right there. You evoke sandbox, then break it for RL reasons? Plex should have been standardized by CCP with no player profit from the start. That way no one can 'fund' themselves using RL money - that is PtW.
Yes. EVE is actually a pay-to-win game. The difference is that the amount of "pay-to-win" is inherently limited by the number of players willing to pay ISK to sub their accounts with PLEX. It places an upper bound on the effectiveness of PtW, because an infinitely rich player can not buy an infinite number of PLEX to generate an infinite amount of ISK out of nowhere. The demand for PLEX is intrinsically finite, and thus there is a finite limit to the amount of "advantage" you can buy.
FURTHERMORE, even though there is "PtW", selling PLEX doesn't inherently grant you access to any items/activities that could not be obtained by playing the game. Therefore, PLEX isn't "PtW" in the sense of selling power to players, it is "PtW" in the sense of selling "accelerated gameplay" to players. And the people selling this "accelerated gameplay" is not CCP, but the players themselves.
The core difference between PLEX and other MT systems is that *EVERY* single advantage afforded by PLEX had to have been created by players playing the game in some way, shape or form. Every single ship had to be built, every single officer item had to be looted, every single last .01 ISK had to be rewarded through bounties/mission rewards/insurance payouts/etc...
|

fuer0n
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 20:20:00 -
[155] - Quote
someone is manipulating the price of plex, at first i thought it was ccp.
who would have motives to do such a thing? and why? |

Lord Mandelor
Consolidated Holdings War Ensemble.
14
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 20:23:00 -
[156] - Quote
So . . . basically OP has never heard of supply & demand or inflation. This is nearly as bad as the people who complained about CCP giving out free aurum when they thought it would be better to give out free isk. ConHo Daily: http://conhodaily.blogspot.com Stories ranging from midgets inside your Damage Control to drones becoming self-aware. |

Jita Alt666
449
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 20:25:00 -
[157] - Quote
fuer0n wrote:someone is manipulating the price of plex, at first i thought it was ccp.
who would have motives to do such a thing? and why?
Because making your enemies spend real money on Internet spaceships when they don't want to is uber meta gaming.
|

fuer0n
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 20:27:00 -
[158] - Quote
Jita Alt666 wrote:fuer0n wrote:someone is manipulating the price of plex, at first i thought it was ccp.
who would have motives to do such a thing? and why? Because making your enemies spend real money on Internet spaceships when they don't want to is uber meta gaming.
nice cover sonny. i hope they take away your accounts if you are up to what i think you lot are. and inform the tax man to make sure your paying revenue on all your incomes. |

Jita Alt666
449
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 21:16:00 -
[159] - Quote
fuer0n wrote:Jita Alt666 wrote:fuer0n wrote:someone is manipulating the price of plex, at first i thought it was ccp.
who would have motives to do such a thing? and why? Because making your enemies spend real money on Internet spaceships when they don't want to is uber meta gaming. nice cover sonny. i hope they take away your accounts if you are up to what i think you lot are. and inform the tax man to make sure your paying revenue on all your incomes.
What?
I was implying intentionally driving up the plex price outside of the price bracket of the average grunt in a 0.0 alliance, thus forcing them to choose between: 1. activating a credit card subscription 2. attempt to raise isk at the expense of alliance cta's 3. get feed up and quit alliance to go make isk else where
Edit: anyway item turnover seems pretty stable as prices lift... ...we all know what that means. Iam interested to see if they can hit 500.
Double Edit: when the winter patch is released and the awesome turns to awful, this bubble will pop. |

Anya Ohaya
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
26
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 21:57:00 -
[160] - Quote
Tenchi Sal wrote:classic case of inflation. eve has no real isk sinks. its only going to go higher. deal with it.
A rise in the price of one item, or even a handful is not inflation.
The most likely explanation is a reduced supply of plex.
Eve has plenty of ISK sinks, and with the increasing abundance of LP there will be more and more ISK dumped into LP stores. |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
151
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 22:44:00 -
[161] - Quote
fuer0n wrote:
nice cover sonny. i hope they take away your accounts if you are up to what i think you lot are. and inform the tax man to make sure your paying revenue on all your incomes.
At first I thought this thread couldn't get any dumber than the Thorn guy posting.
Then I saw the PIE guy complaining that PLEX allowed Pay to Win strategies.
Then I saw your post.
I am frankly astonished that that lot of you haven't suffered some tragic real world accident due to the absolute highest levels of stupidity and short sightedness ever encased in one human body.
Thorn, you are dumb. There are no other words to covert it.
PIE guys, people will buy money in MMO's, its a historical fact, you can't stop it, fighting it takes millions of dollars and intrusive software that EVE players have flat out said is a no go, so circumventing that by legally allowing a method was the obvious cheapest/best choice. Denial of that basically makes you thorn.
Then this last guy.....I have no words, because you make the first two guys look like god damn rocket scientists. |

Jita Alt666
449
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 22:46:00 -
[162] - Quote
Anya Ohaya wrote:Tenchi Sal wrote:classic case of inflation. eve has no real isk sinks. its only going to go higher. deal with it. A rise in the price of one item, or even a handful is not inflation. The most likely explanation is a reduced supply of plex. Eve has plenty of ISK sinks, and with the increasing abundance of LP there will be more and more ISK dumped into LP stores.
The biggest ISK sink, the supercapital class is being nerfed in the next patch. |

Demon View
24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire
28
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 22:48:00 -
[163] - Quote
Anya Ohaya wrote:Tenchi Sal wrote:classic case of inflation. eve has no real isk sinks. its only going to go higher. deal with it. A rise in the price of one item, or even a handful is not inflation. The most likely explanation is a reduced supply of plex. Eve has plenty of ISK sinks, and with the increasing abundance of LP there will be more and more ISK dumped into LP stores.
CCP have the stats, but consider:
A PLEX buyer (isk->PLEX) wants to buy a PLEX every month for every one of his accounts.
A PLEX seller (money->PLEX) wants to buy a PLEX... eh, whenever. Maybe only once, to get things started. Maybe after he gets podded with +5s in.
A PLEX seller who wants to fund a specific purchase (money->Aeon) will purchase less PLEX as the price (PLEX->isk) rises. As prices are observed to rise, occasional PLEX sellers who just want extra isk, since they're not on a schedule like PLEX buyers are, can sit and wait comfortably to see if prices continue to rise. And when they do sell, the higher price means that they're content to not sell PLEX for longer.
And whereas the PLEX buyers brag proudly about playing for 'free', and tell others to get in on this awesome system, and are seen in the forums even to have a sense of entitlement over the price (PLEX->isk) of PLEX, the PLEX sellers tend to silence, and are stigmatized to an extent.
It's certainly not unbelievable to me that five-PLEX-a-month 'clockwork' demand is outpacing the 'whenever' supply. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
1145
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 22:54:00 -
[164] - Quote
Jita Alt666 wrote:The biggest ISK sink, the supercapital class is being nerfed in the next patch. GǪand they are ISK sinks, how, exactly?
GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki-á |

fuer0n
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 22:59:00 -
[165] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:fuer0n wrote:
nice cover sonny. i hope they take away your accounts if you are up to what i think you lot are. and inform the tax man to make sure your paying revenue on all your incomes.
At first I thought this thread couldn't get any dumber than the Thorn guy posting. Then I saw the PIE guy complaining that PLEX allowed Pay to Win strategies. Then I saw your post. I am frankly astonished that that lot of you haven't suffered some tragic real world accident due to the absolute highest levels of stupidity and short sightedness ever encased in one human body. Thorn, you are dumb. There are no other words to covert it. PIE guys, people will buy money in MMO's, its a historical fact, you can't stop it, fighting it takes millions of dollars and intrusive software that EVE players have flat out said is a no go, so circumventing that by legally allowing a method was the obvious cheapest/best choice. Denial of that basically makes you thorn. Then this last guy.....I have no words, because you make the first two guys look like god damn rocket scientists.
whats the matter? isk not selling so converting it into plex to sell cheaper than ccp can?
|

Jita Alt666
449
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 23:05:00 -
[166] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Jita Alt666 wrote:The biggest ISK sink, the supercapital class is being nerfed in the next patch. GǪand they are ISK sinks, how, exactly?
They are not. Please keep up with quality and factuality of my posting in this thread. I am simply attempting to lead some poor saps to the rather vacuous and completely incorrect conclusion that plex prices are being manipulated by angry supercap pilots.
|

Henry Haphorn
Aliastra Gallente Federation
68
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 23:18:00 -
[167] - Quote
From an accounting perspective, Thorn Galen is right on one thing (although he is way off with his math).
There is a critical step that people here are missing.
1. Player A buys GTC online and converts the GTC to PLEX.
2. PLEX that is unused and sitting in the hangar adds what CCP would most likely call "Deferred Income". 1x unused PLEX = Cash stuck in limbo (no one can touch it) until one of three conditions are met: ***NOTE: Even PLEX that is bought with ISK by another player is still unused PLEX.***
A) Player A (or anyone other than Player A that bought the PLEX from him/her) redeems the PLEX for game time. B) Player A (or anyone other than Player A that bought the PLEX from him/her) donates the PLEX to a cause hosted by CCP. C) Player A (or anyone other than Player A that bought the PLEX from him/her) redeems the PLEX for Aurum.
Those are the only three conditions in which cash in limbo becomes unstuck and is no longer deferred income.
3. If conditions A or C are met, CCP keeps the cash and marks it as service income.
3.1. If condition B is met, CCP doesn't keep the cash so it pays the cash to a charity.
If you consider how PLEX is now commonly used as a traded commodity and thus some traders might just simply hold the unused PLEX for future trades, that means there is a great deal of cash stuck in limbo. How much? Only CCP knows.
But regardless, CCP doesn't lose money this way. They lose money when players unsub.
Of course, I could be wrong as well. Can anyone come up with a better theory? |

Mirima Thurander
Deventer Exploration An Acquisition
44
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 23:27:00 -
[168] - Quote
Thorn Galen wrote:PLEX for gametime is negatively affecting CCP's cashflow.
Here's a simplistic scenario :-
I Spend $10 for a PLEX on the site. You who have billions of ISK buy the PLEX for 400Million ISK You buy more. And more. You use a PLEX to fund an account, however many you may have, 1 or 20, does not matter. You do not pay $20 to sub for a couple of months, not ever. Say 50,000 accounts on the system. 10,000 are paying hard cash for subs 5,000 are paying hard cash for PLEX There's a defecit of real money, real money not going to CCP. Funding an account by buying and using ingame PLEX is a loss for CCP.
CCP is bleeding badly because of PLEX for subs.
you do know someone payed $ for that plex to sell for isk right?
I love the the smell of victory in the morning. It smells like... Blood, vomit and burning flesh. |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration
101
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 23:27:00 -
[169] - Quote
Wow. PLEX is at 450? It has gone up... yikes... All GëíGêçGëí Ships | Many Odd GëíGêçGëí Items (+Drones) | <-- Links to showInfo in-game |

Demon View
24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire
28
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 23:34:00 -
[170] - Quote
Henry Haphorn wrote:2. PLEX that is unused and sitting in the hangar adds what CCP would most likely call "Deferred Income". 1x unused PLEX = Cash stuck in limbo (no one can touch it) until one of three conditions are met: ***NOTE: Even PLEX that is bought with ISK by another player is still unused PLEX.***
A) Player A (or anyone other than Player A that bought the PLEX from him/her) redeems the PLEX for game time. B) Player A (or anyone other than Player A that bought the PLEX from him/her) donates the PLEX to a cause hosted by CCP. C) Player A (or anyone other than Player A that bought the PLEX from him/her) redeems the PLEX for Aurum.
It's useful for them to consider the potential liability when they say that they'll accept PLEX donations, and it's useful for them to do real-money accounting with the NEX store, but there's otherwise no 'deferred income' here. They get the money when the PLEX is created. |

John Wilkes Booth
Global Tetrahedron
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 00:29:00 -
[171] - Quote
Henry Haphorn wrote:From an accounting perspective, Thorn Galen is right on one thing (although he is way off with his math).
There is a critical step that people here are missing.
1. Player A buys GTC online and converts the GTC to PLEX.
2. PLEX that is unused and sitting in the hangar adds what CCP would most likely call "Deferred Income". 1x unused PLEX = Cash stuck in limbo (no one can touch it) until one of three conditions are met: ***NOTE: Even PLEX that is bought with ISK by another player is still unused PLEX.***
A) Player A (or anyone other than Player A that bought the PLEX from him/her) redeems the PLEX for game time. B) Player A (or anyone other than Player A that bought the PLEX from him/her) donates the PLEX to a cause hosted by CCP. C) Player A (or anyone other than Player A that bought the PLEX from him/her) redeems the PLEX for Aurum.
Those are the only three conditions in which cash in limbo becomes unstuck and is no longer deferred income.
3. If conditions A or C are met, CCP keeps the cash and marks it as service income.
3.1. If condition B is met, CCP doesn't keep the cash so it pays the cash to a charity.
If you consider how PLEX is now commonly used as a traded commodity and thus some traders might just simply hold the unused PLEX for future trades, that means there is a great deal of cash stuck in limbo. How much? Only CCP knows.
But regardless, CCP doesn't lose money this way. They lose money when players unsub.
Of course, I could be wrong as well. Can anyone come up with a better theory?
But you are talking about the books. How they record it. But while that sale should be recorded as deferred income (presuming CCP is on GAAP or another system that follows that rule (IFRS?)), they are by no means forced to put that cash in an untouchable escrow account until the plex is redeemed. They have the cash, and they can spend it. Don't forget about the other side of that entry. They record the cash in a regular cash account, not restricted cash account (CCP is not a NFP).
And you forgot scenario D) Plex is destroyed when in the cargo of a ship that goes boom. This would like a gift card that never gets used.
Ok, sorry for this becoming an accounting thread :) |

Henry Haphorn
Aliastra Gallente Federation
68
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 00:30:00 -
[172] - Quote
Demon View wrote:Henry Haphorn wrote:2. PLEX that is unused and sitting in the hangar adds what CCP would most likely call "Deferred Income". 1x unused PLEX = Cash stuck in limbo (no one can touch it) until one of three conditions are met: ***NOTE: Even PLEX that is bought with ISK by another player is still unused PLEX.***
A) Player A (or anyone other than Player A that bought the PLEX from him/her) redeems the PLEX for game time. B) Player A (or anyone other than Player A that bought the PLEX from him/her) donates the PLEX to a cause hosted by CCP. C) Player A (or anyone other than Player A that bought the PLEX from him/her) redeems the PLEX for Aurum. It's useful for them to consider the potential liability when they say that they'll accept PLEX donations, and it's useful for them to do real-money accounting with the NEX store, but there's otherwise no 'deferred income' here. They get the money when the PLEX is created.
So what you're saying is that CCP is willing to mark the cash in limbo as just service income and accept the burden of paying taxes even though some of that cash could potentially be used for donations (which can be tax exempt - depending on local tax laws)? |

Taedrin
Kushan Industrial
136
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 00:39:00 -
[173] - Quote
John Wilkes Booth wrote:Henry Haphorn wrote:From an accounting perspective, Thorn Galen is right on one thing (although he is way off with his math).
There is a critical step that people here are missing.
1. Player A buys GTC online and converts the GTC to PLEX.
2. PLEX that is unused and sitting in the hangar adds what CCP would most likely call "Deferred Income". 1x unused PLEX = Cash stuck in limbo (no one can touch it) until one of three conditions are met: ***NOTE: Even PLEX that is bought with ISK by another player is still unused PLEX.***
A) Player A (or anyone other than Player A that bought the PLEX from him/her) redeems the PLEX for game time. B) Player A (or anyone other than Player A that bought the PLEX from him/her) donates the PLEX to a cause hosted by CCP. C) Player A (or anyone other than Player A that bought the PLEX from him/her) redeems the PLEX for Aurum.
Those are the only three conditions in which cash in limbo becomes unstuck and is no longer deferred income.
3. If conditions A or C are met, CCP keeps the cash and marks it as service income.
3.1. If condition B is met, CCP doesn't keep the cash so it pays the cash to a charity.
If you consider how PLEX is now commonly used as a traded commodity and thus some traders might just simply hold the unused PLEX for future trades, that means there is a great deal of cash stuck in limbo. How much? Only CCP knows.
But regardless, CCP doesn't lose money this way. They lose money when players unsub.
Of course, I could be wrong as well. Can anyone come up with a better theory? But you are talking about the books. How they record it. But while that sale should be recorded as deferred income (presuming CCP is on GAAP or another system that follows that rule (IFRS?)), they are by no means forced to put that cash in an untouchable escrow account until the plex is redeemed. They have the cash, and they can spend it. Don't forget about the other side of that entry. They record the cash in a regular cash account, not restricted cash account (CCP is not a NFP). And you forgot scenario D) Plex is destroyed when in the cargo of a ship that goes boom. This would like a gift card that never gets used. Ok, sorry for this becoming an accounting thread :)
I love it when someone who actually knows what they are talking about posts. |

Poetic Stanziel
Arrakis Technology
214
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 01:21:00 -
[174] - Quote
Thorn Galen wrote:PLEX for gametime is negatively affecting CCP's cashflow.
Here's a simplistic scenario :-
I Spend $10 for a PLEX on the site. You who have billions of ISK buy the PLEX for 400Million ISK You buy more. And more. You use a PLEX to fund an account, however many you may have, 1 or 20, does not matter. You do not pay $20 to sub for a couple of months, not ever. Say 50,000 accounts on the system. 10,000 are paying hard cash for subs 5,000 are paying hard cash for PLEX There's a defecit of real money, real money not going to CCP. Funding an account by buying and using ingame PLEX is a loss for CCP.
CCP is bleeding badly because of PLEX for subs. What the hell kind of math is this? Are you using imaginary numbers?
EVE Online: Incarna = New Coke. EVE Online: Winter Expansion = Coke Classic. |

John Wilkes Booth
Global Tetrahedron
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 02:00:00 -
[175] - Quote
Henry Haphorn wrote:Demon View wrote:Henry Haphorn wrote:2. PLEX that is unused and sitting in the hangar adds what CCP would most likely call "Deferred Income". 1x unused PLEX = Cash stuck in limbo (no one can touch it) until one of three conditions are met: ***NOTE: Even PLEX that is bought with ISK by another player is still unused PLEX.***
A) Player A (or anyone other than Player A that bought the PLEX from him/her) redeems the PLEX for game time. B) Player A (or anyone other than Player A that bought the PLEX from him/her) donates the PLEX to a cause hosted by CCP. C) Player A (or anyone other than Player A that bought the PLEX from him/her) redeems the PLEX for Aurum. It's useful for them to consider the potential liability when they say that they'll accept PLEX donations, and it's useful for them to do real-money accounting with the NEX store, but there's otherwise no 'deferred income' here. They get the money when the PLEX is created. So what you're saying is that CCP is willing to mark the cash in limbo as just service income and accept the burden of paying taxes even though some of that cash could potentially be used for donations (which can be tax exempt - depending on local tax laws)?
Again, all of this is dependent on the laws ccp is working under, which I do not claim to know, and when it comes to taxes, corporations have some accounting method options for tax purposes, but it is very likely CCP pays taxes on the income they get from plex sales, even if they are not yet redeemed. It is called a book to tax difference. Taxes do not run on the same system as financial reporting standards.
Actually, thinking about this more, you are probably mistaken in assuming this is deferred revenue to begin with. You are right, this is like a gift card. It cannot be refunded for cash. CCP is never obligated to refund money for a plex. It is earned as soon as the sale is made. Yes, CCP "technically owes" game time as long as the plex is out there, but the more important factor is it is not refundable. As far as a book entry is concerned, they most likely simply debit cash, credit revenue.
But just to follow with the initial assumption that this is deferred (or unearned) revenue, it would still be taxed in the period the plex was sold regardless of if it is redeemed because CCP has no obligation to refund the money. There would be an M1 book-to-tax adjustment on the tax return (this is based off of US taxes).
The fact that CCP has promotions to redeem plex for charity is irrelevant and unrelated. If you redeem plex for a charity, ccp would simply credit cash, debit a charitable donation expense. |
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |