Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Boomer Budd Marcos
Aliastra Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.05 12:09:00 -
[1] - Quote
I have found 10 abandoned POS's in just 2 systems - some have been there for over a year (cause I checked the corps wardec history). It would be nice if a) we could unanchor them and make a profit after they have been abandoned for a period of time - b) if like a container that has seen no activity, they vanish after being in space after a pre-determined time - c) we can destroy them without concord killing us. If a moon has a POS on it than no-one else can put a POS on it correct ?? |

Mole Guy
Xoth Inc
402
|
Posted - 2013.10.05 13:25:00 -
[2] - Quote
been suggested numerous times.
the best idea is to make it a hacking mini game. if a tower goes offline and is down for a certain amount of time, we can hack it, change ownership, insert fuel and bring it up as our own. or unanchor and sell. |

Lucius Saturninus
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
5
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 16:48:00 -
[3] - Quote
If at the very least once the POS runs out of fuel it should start a 30 day clock. After 30 days it and all its structures become abandon and can be claimed or unanchored and taken if you the appropriate skills. |

Abdiel Kavash
Paladin Order Fidelas Constans
1292
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 16:51:00 -
[4] - Quote
Just shoot it. No game change is needed because you're too lazy to spend an hour to secure your moon. |

Danika Princip
Freelance Economics Astrological resources Tactical Narcotics Team
1805
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 16:56:00 -
[5] - Quote
Dec 'em, shoot 'em, steal the mods. |

Lucius Saturninus
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
5
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 18:37:00 -
[6] - Quote
Abdiel Kavash wrote:Just shoot it. No game change is needed because you're too lazy to spend an hour to secure your moon.
The first 2 where fun, blowing up and contracting the owner 1 scrap metal with a note saying here's what left of your POS. But now to go into a C4 and you have 2 abandon dickstars. Its kind of like "Ugh! I'll save my ammo for real targets." I think being able to take or claim the abandon POS and Structures could make it a profitable industry or game career. At least in WH space. K space is a different engine. |

Hesod Adee
Turalyon Plus Turalyon Alliance
88
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 19:38:00 -
[7] - Quote
Abdiel Kavash wrote:Just shoot it. No game change is needed because you're too lazy to spend an hour to secure your moon.
Do you support the laziness of the people who claim a high-sec moon by sticking an offline large tower on it and waiting until someone pays them to remove it ? BTW the only risk in this income is that a corp decides that war deccing you to blow up your high sec large tower is a better use of their time than planting a tower on a worthless low-sec moon. If you decide to pull out of this scheme, you just sell the towers and get your ISK back.
Me, I say that if someone is too lazy and/or incompetent to keep their tower fueled or protected while it's offline, then they don't deserve to keep that tower. |

Rivr Luzade
Coreli Corporation Ineluctable.
70
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 21:19:00 -
[8] - Quote
Boomer Budd Marcos wrote:I have found 10 abandoned POS's in just 2 systems - some have been there for over a year (cause I checked the corps wardec history). It would be nice if a) we could unanchor them and make a profit after they have been abandoned for a period of time - b) if like a container that has seen no activity, they vanish after being in space after a pre-determined time - c) we can destroy them without concord killing us. If a moon has a POS on it than no-one else can put a POS on it correct ??
and
Mole Guy wrote:been suggested numerous times.
the best idea is to make it a hacking mini game. if a tower goes offline and is down for a certain amount of time, we can hack it, change ownership, insert fuel and bring it up as our own. or unanchor and sell.
This is one of the most feasible applications of the hacking game. |

Arthur Aihaken
The.VOID
301
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 22:21:00 -
[9] - Quote
Have the inactive ones slowly drift into the moon's gravity well. I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week. |

Lucius Saturninus
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
5
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 01:45:00 -
[10] - Quote
After trying that mini game at a C4 Data site today I think a hack game would work. Because you cant open those cans unless you got the skills, ship, rigs and knowing. Wow!  |
|

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe WAFFLES.
4264
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 02:13:00 -
[11] - Quote
Shoot the tower, steal the mods, sell the moon.
Bam, now you're profiting from clearing moons. "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon
d-£-󦦦º-ó-ꦪ¦¦e¦¦-í-ë-í-󦦦+¦¦¦»-ö¦+b-¥¦º¦¦¦¦¦½¦¦-ö-ëa-Ŧ+-¥¦í¦+-à-à¦ñc¦ó-á¦í-ƒ¦«¦½¦Ö¦¦¦á-ò-çl-Ǧ¢-ü¦+-û¦ƒ¦¦-ô-ë-Ö-ô¦Ñ-ô¦¬¦½e¦+¦¿¦ù¦¦¦ÿ¦ù¦Ñ¦¼-ò-ꦽ¦¦¦+¦+-ö¦¦-à¦á¦ú¦ÿ |

Hesod Adee
Turalyon Plus Turalyon Alliance
91
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 02:30:00 -
[12] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Shoot the tower, steal the mods, sell the moon.
Bam, now you're profiting from clearing moons. How much ISK per hour would that be ? |

Domanique Altares
Rifterlings Point Blank Alliance
1801
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 03:22:00 -
[13] - Quote
Hesod Adee wrote: Me, I say that if someone is too lazy and/or incompetent to keep their tower fueled or protected while it's offline, then they don't deserve to keep that tower.
That's nice. Why don't you go ahead and war dec them, attack their high sec tower, and see if they are too lazy to defend it?
If they don't defend it? Bash tower, take moon.
If they do? You either win, and take the moon anyway, or you lose, and the moon was never going to be yours to begin with. Rifterlings pirate corporation is now recruiting pilots for lowsec solo & small gang operations. Visit our website at www.rifterlings.com or join our in game channel weflyrifters to speak to a recruiter. |

Hesod Adee
Turalyon Plus Turalyon Alliance
91
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 04:07:00 -
[14] - Quote
Domanique Altares wrote:Hesod Adee wrote: Me, I say that if someone is too lazy and/or incompetent to keep their tower fueled or protected while it's offline, then they don't deserve to keep that tower.
That's nice. Why don't you go ahead and war dec them, attack their high sec tower, and see if they are too lazy to defend it? If they don't defend it? Bash tower, take moon. If they do? You either win, and take the moon anyway, or you lose, and the moon was never going to be yours to begin with.
How long do you think it takes to remove an undefended large tower in high sec ? Assume a small corp. 20 people in it at most. Be sure to consider what they want a high sec POS for, and what that implies about their trained skills.
How do you plan to keep the attacking pilots paying enough attention during the attack that they can respond to the defenders showing up ?
How much do high sec merc groups charge for removing an offline large tower ? |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe WAFFLES.
4265
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 06:50:00 -
[15] - Quote
Hesod Adee wrote:How long do you think it takes to remove an undefended large tower in high sec ? Assume a small corp. 20 people in it at most. Be sure to consider what they want a high sec POS for, and what that implies about their trained skills.
If they can't be bothered to do it themselves, they can pay someone to do it for them, find an empty moon, or buy a moon from someone.
Quote:How do you plan to keep the attacking pilots paying enough attention during the attack that they can respond to the defenders showing up ?
"CCP should magic our enemies towers away because we might risk our ships by not being at the keyboard while shooting our enemies towers ourselves."
Quote:How much do high sec merc groups charge for removing an offline large tower ?
Ask them. "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon
d-£-󦦦º-ó-ꦪ¦¦e¦¦-í-ë-í-󦦦+¦¦¦»-ö¦+b-¥¦º¦¦¦¦¦½¦¦-ö-ëa-Ŧ+-¥¦í¦+-à-à¦ñc¦ó-á¦í-ƒ¦«¦½¦Ö¦¦¦á-ò-çl-Ǧ¢-ü¦+-û¦ƒ¦¦-ô-ë-Ö-ô¦Ñ-ô¦¬¦½e¦+¦¿¦ù¦¦¦ÿ¦ù¦Ñ¦¼-ò-ꦽ¦¦¦+¦+-ö¦¦-à¦á¦ú¦ÿ |

Hesod Adee
Turalyon Plus Turalyon Alliance
92
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 08:40:00 -
[16] - Quote
Why should someone who is unwilling, or unable, to fuel a POS be able to claim a moon and stop someone who is willing and able to fuel a POS from setting up their own ?
Or, in the extreme case: Why should someone who is not even subscribed to Eve be able to claim moons for himself ?
RubyPorto wrote:Hesod Adee wrote:How long do you think it takes to remove an undefended large tower in high sec ? Assume a small corp. 20 people in it at most. Be sure to consider what they want a high sec POS for, and what that implies about their trained skills. If they can't be bothered to do it themselves, they can pay someone to do it for them, find an empty moon, or buy a moon from someone.
If you don't answer my question, I'll just assume you realize that giving an honest answer would be devastating for your argument.
Quote:Quote:How do you plan to keep the attacking pilots paying enough attention during the attack that they can respond to the defenders showing up ? "CCP should magic our enemies towers away because we might risk our ships by not being at the keyboard while shooting our enemies towers ourselves."
Are you saying you think that people should be able to earn ISK with no risk, and no input on their part ?
Because that's what offline high sec towers are. You just plant the tower, then wait for someone to want the moon enough to pay for it. Worst case, you just recover the tower and sell it to get your ISK back. Should someone war dec you, and actually start attacking the POS you can wait till boredom has defeated them, then swing by in a single ship and start popping attackers.
If they had to fuel those towers, then they would at least risk spending more in fuel costs than they get from the eventual sale.
Or are you saying that it's unreasonable for CCP to treat subscribed playe
Are there any high sec merc groups willing to take out a high sec POS ?
Does it make a difference if you can convince the mercs that everyone in the corp that owns the POS isn't subscribed ? |

Domanique Altares
Rifterlings Point Blank Alliance
1802
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 08:53:00 -
[17] - Quote
Hesod Adee wrote: How long do you think it takes to remove an undefended large tower in high sec ? Assume a small corp. 20 people in it at most. Be sure to consider what they want a high sec POS for, and what that implies about their trained skills.
Exactly as long as it takes anywhere else.
Your other questions are irrelevant; I don't care how many of them there are, or what they want it for; their financial issues are not mine. If they can't make a return on bashing someone else's POS, then obviously they shouldn't be bashing it. Their skill training, or lack thereof, is also not my issue.
If they want that moon badly enough, they'll find a way to take it. If they can't find a way, then they don't want it badly enough, and should move on to something else.
Quote: How do you plan to keep the attacking pilots paying enough attention during the attack that they can respond to the defenders showing up ?
I don't plan on it; if I need a POS bashed, I'll round up people who don't suffer attention deficit issues, and can stay on task. If they decide to go wandering off to make a sandwich or watch TV or pull their crank and subsequently die to a response fleet, then they deserved to die. This is basic PvP operation; if someone can't manage this, they shouldn't be bashing a POS. They will also be completely unprepared and unable to defend any POS that they own, so good luck to them hanging onto it when someone else comes looking for that moon.
Quote: How much do high sec merc groups charge for removing an offline large tower ?
I have absolutely no idea, nor do I care. If you do, you might try soliciting their services in the relevant area of the forums. Rifterlings pirate corporation is now recruiting pilots for lowsec solo & small gang operations. Visit our website at www.rifterlings.com or join our in game channel weflyrifters to speak to a recruiter. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe WAFFLES.
4265
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 09:13:00 -
[18] - Quote
Hesod Adee wrote:Why should someone who is unwilling, or unable, to fuel a POS be able to claim a moon and stop someone who is willing and able to fuel a POS from setting up their own ?
Or, in the extreme case: Why should someone who is not even subscribed to Eve be able to claim moons for himself ?
Why should someone who is unwilling or unable to shoot down a structure that can do nothing to fight back be able to take real estate from someone who claimed it first?
Quote:If you don't answer my question, I'll just assume you realize that giving an honest answer would be devastating for your argument.
Exactly EHP/DPS seconds. Do your own homework. Armageddons with Sentries and Pulse lasers tend to be preferred. I'll let you work out why.
Quote:Are you saying you think that people should be able to earn ISK with no risk, and no input on their part ?
They're risking a tower.
Quote:Because that's what offline high sec towers are. You just plant the tower, then wait for someone to want the moon enough to pay for it. Worst case, you just recover the tower and sell it to get your ISK back. Should someone war dec you, and actually start attacking the POS you can wait till boredom has defeated them, then swing by in a single ship and start popping attackers. Now they're risking their ships and inputting quite a bit of effort, especially since you can just kill the tower when none of your wardec targets are online.
Quote:Are there any high sec merc groups willing to take out a high sec POS ?
Does it make a difference if you can convince the mercs that everyone in the corp that owns the POS isn't subscribed ?
Ask them. They're over in C&P. "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon
d-£-󦦦º-ó-ꦪ¦¦e¦¦-í-ë-í-󦦦+¦¦¦»-ö¦+b-¥¦º¦¦¦¦¦½¦¦-ö-ëa-Ŧ+-¥¦í¦+-à-à¦ñc¦ó-á¦í-ƒ¦«¦½¦Ö¦¦¦á-ò-çl-Ǧ¢-ü¦+-û¦ƒ¦¦-ô-ë-Ö-ô¦Ñ-ô¦¬¦½e¦+¦¿¦ù¦¦¦ÿ¦ù¦Ñ¦¼-ò-ꦽ¦¦¦+¦+-ö¦¦-à¦á¦ú¦ÿ |

Zappity
Kurved Space
522
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 09:43:00 -
[19] - Quote
Of course they should be hackable. The number of abandoned POSes is ridiculous, especially in J-space.
I would prefer there to be more of a consequence to leaving such a player-owned structure offline. At the moment you can effectively put them in 'sleep' mode and be woken up with plenty of time to spare if someone shows an interest in it. Not very EVE - like. Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec. |

Altered Ego
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
26
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 16:32:00 -
[20] - Quote
Hesod Adee wrote: ... Or, in the extreme case: Why should someone who is not even subscribed to Eve be able to claim moons for himself?
I've read and supported dozens of these posts, but this is a magnificent point that I don't think I've ever heard before.
RubyPorto wrote:Why should someone who is unwilling or unable to shoot down a structure that can do nothing to fight back be able to take real estate from someone who claimed it first?
The whole point of hacking an offline pos is that no one wants the thing, nor do they want the resources, anymore. |
|

Gizznitt Malikite
Agony Unleashed Agony Empire
2742
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 16:49:00 -
[21] - Quote
Domanique Altares wrote:Hesod Adee wrote: How long do you think it takes to remove an undefended large tower in high sec ? Assume a small corp. 20 people in it at most. Be sure to consider what they want a high sec POS for, and what that implies about their trained skills.
Exactly as long as it takes anywhere else.
This is blatantly false.
In lowsec, nullsec, and WH's capitals are used to remove POS's because of their enormous EHP. An offline tower has 50 MILLION EHP. Assuming 20 people in BS's doing 1k dps, it would take them 40+ minutes to take down the POS. Add to this the fact there is very little reward in doing this.
A hacking mechanic to remove towers is just fine, and absolutely should be implemented!
However, it needs several caveats:
1.) Hacking takes time: Say 20 minutes of sitting there to complete the minigame. 2.) Hacking is an aggressive action: Unless you are at war with the owning corp, hack a tower in lowsec and you go suspect. Hack a tower in highsec, you go criminal! This adds a wardec "warning" to anyone with offline towers in highsec. 3.) If there is stront in the stront bay (i.e. the tower was online and went offline), then successfully hacking the tower causes it to go through an RF period based on the amount of stront in the bay. Hence, a 1.5 day wait to claim the tower against someone who's prepared (in any sec status).
With these caveats, hacking a tower anywhere becomes non-trivial, but worthwhile. And everyone/anyone can defend against it if they desire.
|

Boomer Budd Marcos
Trash n Grab
5
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 12:23:00 -
[22] - Quote
In addition to my original statement - I had an after thought about the "Starbase Charters" - An electronic charter code issued by the _________ Federation which permits the bearer to use a starbase around a moon in Federation sovereign space for 1 hour. The code is stored on tamperproof chips which must be inserted into the starbase control tower. How can they keep the control towers up without these ? So if no-one has been inserting these than why are the abandoned towers still up ? and why do we have to wardec them when they are in violation of the said space ?? |

Lucius Saturninus
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
6
|
Posted - 2013.12.01 04:27:00 -
[23] - Quote
OK, new thought. What if in addition to the Fuel and Strontium Bays in a POS they add Barracks or Crew Quarters? Then you have to keep it staffed with Janitors, Scientists and Marines or the POS and its ArrayGÇÖs will begin to break down and take damage over time? As long as itGÇÖs online and staffed initially then you donGÇÖt have to keep adding staff. But if goes off line, then they begin dying, or letGÇÖs say just leaving . Once they are gone then itGÇÖs only a matter of time before the Arrays and then POS becomes Space Dust. Unless it gets repGÇÖd or put back online and then restaffed. |

Seranova Farreach
Lion Squadron
458
|
Posted - 2013.12.01 05:58:00 -
[24] - Quote
Mole Guy wrote:been suggested numerous times.
the best idea is to make it a hacking mini game. if a tower goes offline and is down for a certain amount of time, we can hack it, change ownership, insert fuel and bring it up as our own. or unanchor and sell.
maybe a slightly harder/bigger hacking map a-kin to the ghost site hacking minigame and perhaps 30 days after it was offlined it can be hacked. same goes for the moduals/hangers/silos connected to it. |

Zvaarian the Red
Evil Leprechaun Brigade
117
|
Posted - 2013.12.01 06:47:00 -
[25] - Quote
Abdiel Kavash wrote:Just shoot it. No game change is needed because you're too lazy to spend an hour to secure your moon.
It'd be much more interesting if abandoned POS's were salvageable somehow rather than being forced to bash them (something that is the opposite of interesting). I don't get why anyone would respond the way you just did, but that's forums for you... |

Sal Landry
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
129
|
Posted - 2013.12.01 08:13:00 -
[26] - Quote
Gizznitt Malikite wrote:Assuming 20 people in BS's doing 1k dps, it would take them 40+ minutes to take down the POS.
40+ MINUTES?!?! BUT MY ISK/HOUR!!!! THE HUMANITY!!!!! |

Gigan Amilupar
No Code of Conduct Fluffeh Bunneh Murder Squad
78
|
Posted - 2013.12.01 08:15:00 -
[27] - Quote
Zvaarian the Red wrote:It'd be much more interesting if abandoned POS's were salvageable somehow rather than being forced to bash them (something that is the opposite of interesting)
This. IMHO after a tower has had no fuel for a week it should lose the ability to go into reinforce and lose its bubble and everything. Then, they should either be able to be salvaged by some kind of large scale salvage ship (like a bigger noctis designed for POS reclamation) or should be able to be hacked. Hacking gives control of the tower, Salvaging gives salvage and modules (but not all of them). Ideally, hack tower, remove everything, salvage tower for salvage, profit. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe WAFFLES.
4387
|
Posted - 2013.12.01 08:34:00 -
[28] - Quote
Gigan Amilupar wrote:This. IMHO after a tower has had no fuel for a week it should lose the ability to go into reinforce and lose its bubble and everything.
I'll raise you that, and suggest that those things should happen immediately, as soon as it runs out of fuel.
Oh, wait...
Quote:Ideally, hack tower, remove everything, salvage tower for salvage, profit.
Shoot tower, remove everything hanging from it, profit. "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon
d-£-󦦦º-ó-ꦪ¦¦e¦¦-í-ë-í-󦦦+¦¦¦»-ö¦+b-¥¦º¦¦¦¦¦½¦¦-ö-ëa-Ŧ+-¥¦í¦+-à-à¦ñc¦ó-á¦í-ƒ¦«¦½¦Ö¦¦¦á-ò-çl-Ǧ¢-ü¦+-û¦ƒ¦¦-ô-ë-Ö-ô¦Ñ-ô¦¬¦½e¦+¦¿¦ù¦¦¦ÿ¦ù¦Ñ¦¼-ò-ꦽ¦¦¦+¦+-ö¦¦-à¦á¦ú¦ÿ |

Arya Regnar
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
344
|
Posted - 2013.12.01 08:35:00 -
[29] - Quote
Since I made this thread before I'm just going to leave this here.
I support this.
EvE-Mail me if you need anything.
|

Gigan Amilupar
No Code of Conduct Fluffeh Bunneh Murder Squad
78
|
Posted - 2013.12.01 09:34:00 -
[30] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Shoot tower, remove everything hanging from it, profit.
There is nothing wrong with shooting towers, but it cannot hurt to have more mechanics in game for POS removal/reclamation then just hitting F1 in a pulse oracle and going AFK. That's all I'm saying.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |