| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 .. 14 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
12042
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 09:08:00 -
[301] - Quote
Snow Axe wrote:Why would you expect any less? They traded in their player advocate hats a long time ago in exchange for ~improved access~ (fat lot of good it did them here, hey?). Don't let the election fool you, they don't represent players anymore. For all intents and purposes, they are CCP employees, with the only notable distinction being that they're dumb enough to work without pay for a for-profit corporation.
*sips mojito
1 Kings 12:11
|

Kate stark
406
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 09:11:00 -
[302] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Snow Axe wrote:Why would you expect any less? They traded in their player advocate hats a long time ago in exchange for ~improved access~ (fat lot of good it did them here, hey?). Don't let the election fool you, they don't represent players anymore. For all intents and purposes, they are CCP employees, with the only notable distinction being that they're dumb enough to work without pay for a for-profit corporation. *sips mojito i'll admit, i only took a brief glance at the last page of this thread.
but at a glance, i guess you've decided to come back and troll rather than actually address the player concerns? still, it seems to be more than CCP are doing right now. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or i's account, if you're reading this. |

Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
418
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 09:28:00 -
[303] - Quote
Snow Axe wrote:Why would you expect any less? They traded in their player advocate hats a long time ago in exchange for ~improved access~ (fat lot of good it did them here, hey?). Don't let the election fool you, they don't represent players anymore. For all intents and purposes, they are CCP employees, with the only notable distinction being that they're dumb enough to work without pay for a for-profit corporation. Malacanis is doing a pretty good job of expressing my view point. So... he's being a good player advocate from my side of the fence..... I.E. You can't call the CSM out on 'not listening' when players are saying it's not a big deal in opposition to your view point. I have a few issues over it, and have brought them up in the CSM forums in a polite non rage manner where a CSM member has taken them on board. So, they certainly seem to care about our views. Just possibly you haven't provided enough rational facts & logic to convince them that your view has serious merit. |

Kate stark
407
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 09:36:00 -
[304] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:Malacanis is doing a pretty good job of expressing my view point. your viewpoint is that you're also totally oblivious to the issue? Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or i's account, if you're reading this. |

Signal11th
DARKNESS.
1123
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 09:38:00 -
[305] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:Malcanis wrote:Snow Axe wrote:Why would you expect any less? They traded in their player advocate hats a long time ago in exchange for ~improved access~ (fat lot of good it did them here, hey?). Don't let the election fool you, they don't represent players anymore. For all intents and purposes, they are CCP employees, with the only notable distinction being that they're dumb enough to work without pay for a for-profit corporation. *sips mojito i'll admit, i only took a brief glance at the last page of this thread. but at a glance, i guess you've decided to come back and troll rather than actually address the player concerns? still, it seems to be more than CCP are doing right now.
No offence but it seems to be the same people over and over instead of a majority of people.... I'm not a fan of what they have done but I'm sure if I had received one of these ships I'd have been happy., I haven't and to be honest I'm not going to lose any sleep over it.
I'm not sure why Somer need these ships as they probably have more money than anyone in the game but it's CCP's decision to make not yours or mine. Powered by-áreaTh-áFilter V1.23 "All posts by this pilot are personal held views and not representitive of-áany-ácorp or alliance I am currently a member of. Like I'd give a-ásh*t anyway. God Said "Come Forth and receive eternal life!" I came fifth and won a toaster. |

Kate stark
407
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 09:42:00 -
[306] - Quote
Signal11th wrote:No offence but it seems to be the same people over and over instead of a majority of people.... I'm not a fan of what they have done but I'm sure if I had received one of these ships I'd have been happy., I haven't and to be honest I'm not going to lose any sleep over it.
obviously, who wouldn't be happy if they'd been given a fist full of isk from their buddies at CCP?
not that any of that changes the fact that malcanis has missed the point, every time he posts.
i'll illustrate the point, again. nobody cares that blink got ships nobody cares that scorpions were handed out. people are upset because ccp giving anything they want, to any one they feel, without a word about it is a massively bad idea. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or i's account, if you're reading this. |

Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
418
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 09:43:00 -
[307] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:Signal11th wrote:No offence but it seems to be the same people over and over instead of a majority of people.... I'm not a fan of what they have done but I'm sure if I had received one of these ships I'd have been happy., I haven't and to be honest I'm not going to lose any sleep over it. obviously, who wouldn't be happy if they'd been given a fist full of isk from their buddies at CCP? not that any of that changes the fact that malcanis has missed the point, every time he posts. Simply because you believe it so does not make it fact. |

Kate stark
407
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 09:44:00 -
[308] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:Kate stark wrote:Signal11th wrote:No offence but it seems to be the same people over and over instead of a majority of people.... I'm not a fan of what they have done but I'm sure if I had received one of these ships I'd have been happy., I haven't and to be honest I'm not going to lose any sleep over it. obviously, who wouldn't be happy if they'd been given a fist full of isk from their buddies at CCP? not that any of that changes the fact that malcanis has missed the point, every time he posts. Simply because you believe it so does not make it fact.
no, him missing the point every post makes it fact. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or i's account, if you're reading this. |

Signal11th
DARKNESS.
1123
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 09:48:00 -
[309] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:Signal11th wrote:No offence but it seems to be the same people over and over instead of a majority of people.... I'm not a fan of what they have done but I'm sure if I had received one of these ships I'd have been happy., I haven't and to be honest I'm not going to lose any sleep over it. obviously, who wouldn't be happy if they'd been given a fist full of isk from their buddies at CCP? not that any of that changes the fact that malcanis has missed the point, every time he posts.
What can he do? He may or may not have resgistered his misgivings about it but apart from that what can he do? He can agree with what's happened or disagree. If people aren't happy then they will vote next time as to which direction they aren't happy with.
There's not point going over the same stuff trying to get him to change his viewpoint if he isn't inclined to do it. The CSM is there in it's entiritey to reflect the majority viewpoint of the playerbase. If you are having no luck with one CSM rep try another one....
Powered by-áreaTh-áFilter V1.23 "All posts by this pilot are personal held views and not representitive of-áany-ácorp or alliance I am currently a member of. Like I'd give a-ásh*t anyway. God Said "Come Forth and receive eternal life!" I came fifth and won a toaster. |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
6069
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 09:48:00 -
[310] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Snow Axe wrote:Why would you expect any less? They traded in their player advocate hats a long time ago in exchange for ~improved access~ (fat lot of good it did them here, hey?). Don't let the election fool you, they don't represent players anymore. For all intents and purposes, they are CCP employees, with the only notable distinction being that they're dumb enough to work without pay for a for-profit corporation. *sips mojito Thanks for your input.  EVE Online - A Rigged Game |

Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
418
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 09:48:00 -
[311] - Quote
Thus demonstrating why you are completely missing our points. That just because he disagrees does not mean he is 'missing the point' nor does it mean he's some CCP mouthpiece. It means he has an opinion. And simply repeating 'you are missing the point' is not going to change it. Logic might if you can find the right logic. |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
6069
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 09:50:00 -
[312] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:Thus demonstrating why you are completely missing our points. That just because he disagrees does not mean he is 'missing the point' nor does it mean he's some CCP mouthpiece. It means he has an opinion. And simply repeating 'you are missing the point' is not going to change it. Logic might if you can find the right logic. Yeah no. He is missing the point. Whether it's willfully or not is hard to say. EVE Online - A Rigged Game |

Kate stark
408
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 09:50:00 -
[313] - Quote
Signal11th wrote:What can he do? He may or may not have resgistered his misgivings about it but apart from that what can he do? He can agree with what's happened or disagree. If people aren't happy then they will vote next time as to which direction they aren't happy with.
There's not point going over the same stuff trying to get him to change his viewpoint if he isn't inclined to do it. The CSM is there in it's entiritey to reflect the majority viewpoint of the playerbase. If you are having no luck with one CSM rep try another one... i shouldn't have to have "luck" with the CSM members understanding an issue, regardless of their viewpoint towards the issue. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or i's account, if you're reading this. |

Kate stark
408
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 09:52:00 -
[314] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:Thus demonstrating why you are completely missing our points. That just because he disagrees does not mean he is 'missing the point' nor does it mean he's some CCP mouthpiece. It means he has an opinion. And simply repeating 'you are missing the point' is not going to change it. Logic might if you can find the right logic.
considering he's yet to comment on the issue, it's unknown where he actually stands. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or i's account, if you're reading this. |

Snow Axe
Atwater Capital
1358
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 09:54:00 -
[315] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Yeah no. He is missing the point. Whether it's willfully or not is hard to say.
Spoiler alert: He doesn't give a **** because it doesn't matter what he thinks because CCP is going to do whatever they want anyway. Malcanis is a lot of things, but stupid or slow he isn't.
It's a wonderful misdirection he's part of, though, whether he even realizes he's part of it or not. Keep everyone arguing about the CSM and their role and who thinks what instead of keeping the vitriol pointed where it should be. "Look any reason why you need to talk like that? I have now reported you. I dont need to listen to your bad tone. If you cant have a grown up conversation then leave the thread[" |

Kate stark
413
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 09:55:00 -
[316] - Quote
Snow Axe wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:Yeah no. He is missing the point. Whether it's willfully or not is hard to say. Spoiler alert: He doesn't give a **** because it doesn't matter what he thinks because CCP is going to do whatever they want anyway. It's a wonderful misdirection he's part of, though, whether he even realizes he's part of it or not. Keep everyone arguing about the CSM and their role and who thinks what instead of keeping the vitriol pointed where it should be. thankfully we have a nearly 70 page thread keeping to the point. shame within those 70 pages there are 0 ccp replies. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or i's account, if you're reading this. |

Signal11th
DARKNESS.
1123
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 10:01:00 -
[317] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:Signal11th wrote:What can he do? He may or may not have resgistered his misgivings about it but apart from that what can he do? He can agree with what's happened or disagree. If people aren't happy then they will vote next time as to which direction they aren't happy with.
There's not point going over the same stuff trying to get him to change his viewpoint if he isn't inclined to do it. The CSM is there in it's entiritey to reflect the majority viewpoint of the playerbase. If you are having no luck with one CSM rep try another one... i shouldn't have to have "luck" with the CSM members understanding an issue, regardless of their viewpoint towards the issue.
??? Why not, I've have a viewpoint about something in my street that I have brought up with my local councillor, have I had any luck with it...no I haven't, so next year I'll be voting for someone else.
You have presented your opinion he obviously doesn't agree/care with/about it so move on and vote/talk for/to someone else. Powered by-áreaTh-áFilter V1.23 "All posts by this pilot are personal held views and not representitive of-áany-ácorp or alliance I am currently a member of. Like I'd give a-ásh*t anyway. God Said "Come Forth and receive eternal life!" I came fifth and won a toaster. |

Snow Axe
Atwater Capital
1358
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 10:03:00 -
[318] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:thankfully we have a nearly 70 page thread keeping to the point. shame within those 70 pages there are 0 ccp replies.
And if one comes, it'll be wholly unsatisfying. They always are.
Want to speak a language they understand? Cancel your sub, and make it very clear why. Maybe try to organize others so they do the same. Make a thing about it in the outside gaming media (they're lazy as ****, so if you do the work for them they'll run with it).
Of course, this begs the question: do you care enough about this issue to bother? Any sad sack can post on a forum over and over again. Do you want to actually take a stand on a thing, or is this all hot air? "Look any reason why you need to talk like that? I have now reported you. I dont need to listen to your bad tone. If you cant have a grown up conversation then leave the thread[" |

Othran
Route One
609
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 10:06:00 -
[319] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:Malcanis wrote:Snow Axe wrote:Why would you expect any less? They traded in their player advocate hats a long time ago in exchange for ~improved access~ (fat lot of good it did them here, hey?). Don't let the election fool you, they don't represent players anymore. For all intents and purposes, they are CCP employees, with the only notable distinction being that they're dumb enough to work without pay for a for-profit corporation. *sips mojito i'll admit, i only took a brief glance at the last page of this thread. but at a glance, i guess you've decided to come back and troll rather than actually address the player concerns? still, it seems to be more than CCP are doing right now.
That's pretty much all he ever does, I gave up reading his drivel months ago. |

Bi-Mi Lansatha
RillaCorp The Kadeshi
209
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 10:06:00 -
[320] - Quote
Malcanis- "...I said I thought the lack of transparency was not the best way..."
Kate stark wrote:... i'll illustrate the point, again. nobody cares that blink got ships nobody cares that scorpions were handed out. people are upset because ccp giving anything they want, to any one they feel, without a word about it is a massively bad idea. Isn't transparency the issue and didn't Malcanis disagree with how it was done? |

Kate stark
413
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 10:07:00 -
[321] - Quote
Signal11th wrote:Kate stark wrote:Signal11th wrote:What can he do? He may or may not have resgistered his misgivings about it but apart from that what can he do? He can agree with what's happened or disagree. If people aren't happy then they will vote next time as to which direction they aren't happy with.
There's not point going over the same stuff trying to get him to change his viewpoint if he isn't inclined to do it. The CSM is there in it's entiritey to reflect the majority viewpoint of the playerbase. If you are having no luck with one CSM rep try another one... i shouldn't have to have "luck" with the CSM members understanding an issue, regardless of their viewpoint towards the issue. ??? Why not, I've have a viewpoint about something in my street that I have brought up with my local councillor, have I had any luck with it...no I haven't, so next year I'll be voting for someone else. You have presented your opinion he obviously doesn't agree/care with/about it so move on and vote/talk for/to someone else.
if he didn't agree, that would be fine. however he has systematically demonstrated that he doesn't *understand* the issue.
at least ripard demonstrated he understood the issue. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or i's account, if you're reading this. |

Snow Axe
Atwater Capital
1358
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 10:09:00 -
[322] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:if he didn't agree, that would be fine. however he has systematically demonstrated that he doesn't *understand* the issue.
at least ripard demonstrated he understood the issue.
Why do you care if he understands or not? What purpose does any of this serve, aside from propagating the myth that the CSM has, or will ever have, a say in anything like this? "Look any reason why you need to talk like that? I have now reported you. I dont need to listen to your bad tone. If you cant have a grown up conversation then leave the thread[" |

Signal11th
DARKNESS.
1123
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 10:11:00 -
[323] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:Signal11th wrote:Kate stark wrote:Signal11th wrote:What can he do? He may or may not have resgistered his misgivings about it but apart from that what can he do? He can agree with what's happened or disagree. If people aren't happy then they will vote next time as to which direction they aren't happy with.
There's not point going over the same stuff trying to get him to change his viewpoint if he isn't inclined to do it. The CSM is there in it's entiritey to reflect the majority viewpoint of the playerbase. If you are having no luck with one CSM rep try another one... i shouldn't have to have "luck" with the CSM members understanding an issue, regardless of their viewpoint towards the issue. ??? Why not, I've have a viewpoint about something in my street that I have brought up with my local councillor, have I had any luck with it...no I haven't, so next year I'll be voting for someone else. You have presented your opinion he obviously doesn't agree/care with/about it so move on and vote/talk for/to someone else. if he didn't agree, that would be fine. however he has systematically demonstrated that he doesn't *understand* the issue. at least ripard demonstrated he understood the issue.
Again, talk to something else then? If I have a problem with my car I don't go and talk to a plumber. It's a group of people on the CSM not all of them understand every aspect of the world of EVE so try someone who you think does. Powered by-áreaTh-áFilter V1.23 "All posts by this pilot are personal held views and not representitive of-áany-ácorp or alliance I am currently a member of. Like I'd give a-ásh*t anyway. God Said "Come Forth and receive eternal life!" I came fifth and won a toaster. |

Kate stark
414
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 10:16:00 -
[324] - Quote
Bi-Mi Lansatha wrote:Malcanis- "...I said I thought the lack of transparency was not the best way..." Kate stark wrote:... i'll illustrate the point, again. nobody cares that blink got ships nobody cares that scorpions were handed out. people are upset because ccp giving anything they want, to any one they feel, without a word about it is a massively bad idea. Isn't transparency the issue and didn't Malcanis disagree with how it was done?
partly. it's also the lack of a defined criteria for handing things out.
let's face it; nobody has an issue with people being rewarded for going "above and beyond". the way it was done is entirely the issue. there's no clear set of criteria for who should get the rewards, there's no clear set of rewards, and yes the whole "under the table" aspect of it just makes it worse.
the new TMC article basically hits the nail on the head; "...CCP was starting a new third-party affiliate program and in the process of developing guidelines for who could participate. Had such guidelines existed (and perhaps been published, or at least referenced) for giving away tokens of thanks to other community members, it would shut up pretty much all of the outrage."
if we knew these handouts were limited to people within the guidelines and they would only be getting certain things, that would be fine. however the current situation leaves it down to ccp saying "hey guys, trust us to do the right thing" and i think that's why it's getting a lot of comparison to the t20 stuff.
literally, ccp just publishing a list of guidelines would solve this issue almost instantly. it would reassure the players that nothing untoward is going on. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or i's account, if you're reading this. |

Kuni Oichi
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
127
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 10:21:00 -
[325] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:
the new TMC article basically hits the nail on the head; "...CCP was starting a new third-party affiliate program and in the process of developing guidelines for who could participate. Had such guidelines existed (and perhaps been published, or at least referenced) for giving away tokens of thanks to other community members, it would shut up pretty much all of the outrage."
It's going to be fascinating to see how they try and crowbar enriching a gambling site to the tune of hundreds of billions of isk into being eligible to receive 'tokens of thanks' secretly. |

Bi-Mi Lansatha
RillaCorp The Kadeshi
209
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 10:21:00 -
[326] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:...it's also the lack of a defined criteria for handing things out. Is it possible CCP recognizes this and are trying to take steps?
First, we are developing a program to allow all 3rd parties the opportunity to apply to participate in these kinds of events and promotions with CCP support...
That said, we recognize it is imperative for CCP to remain impartial with respect to which 3rd parties receive CCP support for these kinds of activities. To that end, we will develop a clear policy on how...
David Reid (CCP Pokethulu, CCP's CMO)
|

Bi-Mi Lansatha
RillaCorp The Kadeshi
209
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 10:24:00 -
[327] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:...the way it was done is entirely the issue... I agree... and so does Malcanis.
|

Kate stark
414
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 10:24:00 -
[328] - Quote
Bi-Mi Lansatha wrote:Kate stark wrote:...it's also the lack of a defined criteria for handing things out. Is it possible CCP recognizes this and are trying to take steps?
First, we are developing a program to allow all 3rd parties the opportunity to apply to participate in these kinds of events and promotions with CCP support... That said, we recognize it is imperative for CCP to remain impartial with respect to which 3rd parties receive CCP support for these kinds of activities. To that end, we will develop a clear policy on how... David Reid (CCP Pokethulu, CCP's CMO)
yeah, great, except they really should do that first then give things out otherwise... ta-dah! Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or i's account, if you're reading this. |

Bi-Mi Lansatha
RillaCorp The Kadeshi
210
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 10:26:00 -
[329] - Quote
Kate stark wrote: yeah, great, except they really should do that first then give things out otherwise... ta-dah!
No disagreement there. CCP should have known better... and had they consulted the CSM first they would have told CCP.
Not every group at CCP works with the CSM.
|

Kate stark
419
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 10:28:00 -
[330] - Quote
Kuni Oichi wrote:Kate stark wrote:
the new TMC article basically hits the nail on the head; "...CCP was starting a new third-party affiliate program and in the process of developing guidelines for who could participate. Had such guidelines existed (and perhaps been published, or at least referenced) for giving away tokens of thanks to other community members, it would shut up pretty much all of the outrage."
It's going to be fascinating to see how they try and crowbar enriching a gambling site to the tune of hundreds of billions of isk into being eligible to receive 'tokens of thanks' secretly.
interesting initiative provides entertainment for many players very generous and sponsor many events well known in the community loved and adored by many
i'm sure there are more buzz words and phrases that they can throw at blink to make it work. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or i's account, if you're reading this. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 .. 14 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |