EVE Search - Are Heavy Energy Destabilizers and Vampires too powerful?

All Channels

Ships and Modules

Are Heavy Energy Destabilizers and Vampires too powerful?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Pam wedghjmo	Posted - 2006.01.27 19:01:00 - [1] these things are guns that never miss no matter ship size or speed other then using up a bit of pg they have no down side in short range combat. and anything smaller then a bs has no way to couter them even cap boosters can't make up for the lost energy maybe these things can be made more like turrets with an optimal range, fall off, and trackingspeed
CptEagle	Posted - 2006.01.27 19:04:00 - [2] No. FatBalls > CCP just checked their logs and no lag ever came from EvE
Sharies	Posted - 2006.01.27 19:04:00 - [3] Edited by: Sharies on 27/01/2006 19:04:55 They do no damage and won't destroy your ship so no. Just my personal opinion http://miniprofile.xfire.com/bg/sf/type/2/moonshade.png
Pam wedghjmo	Posted - 2006.01.27 19:10:00 - [4] they do damage your ship by attacking the life blood of it. with out cap you can not shoot tackle or use mwd/ab to get out of tackle range your dead and easy to pick apart
Beringe	Posted - 2006.01.27 19:18:00 - [5] I'd like to see some sort of counter to them, like perhaps make the cap given by cap batteries be immune to drain. But otherwise, I think they are fine. Makes taking on a bigger ship a risky proposition, if you don't outnumber them. ------------------------------------------- My life is the end of being. The temporal, actual end of thought and soul.
Dragul Imorta	Posted - 2006.01.27 19:19:00 - [6] Originally by: Pam wedghjmo they do damage your ship by attacking the life blood of it. with out cap you can not shoot tackle or use mwd/ab to get out of tackle range your dead and easy to pick apart Projectile turrents (autoguns/artillery) don't use cap and if I am not mistaken, so do missle launchers. But I guess it would be a bother if you fly amarr, Gallante or Caldari ships. I might not be able to repair my armor or regen my shield (as much as I like) but I usually don't need a mwd/afterburner to out speed the tracking of the turrents from the ship that was able to drain my cap dry (another plus for minmatar).
Sharies	Posted - 2006.01.27 19:20:00 - [7] Originally by: Pam wedghjmo they do damage your ship by attacking the life blood of it. with out cap you can not shoot tackle or use mwd/ab to get out of tackle range your dead and easy to pick apart Then Bring a bigger stick. http://miniprofile.xfire.com/bg/sf/type/2/moonshade.png
Naughty Boy	Posted - 2006.01.27 19:24:00 - [8] * Capital Nosferatu * Anti-nosferatu defense * we need anti-nos mod * Nos Penalty in Developmnent * Nosferatu and PVP * Nos/Neuts * Nos? * Nos stacking penalty? Sincerly Yours, The Naughty Boy. ---
Tachy	Posted - 2006.01.27 19:25:00 - [9] All weapons but >small< projectiles and missile launchers use cap. With the 'improved' stacking, NOS and neutralizers are a bit hard to counter. And you're nearly forced to equip them too to break tanks of certain opponents. --==*-- Megadon CCP wanted a well known artist and celebrity to test the new font so it's approval would be well known. They got Ray
Necrologic	Posted - 2006.01.27 19:28:00 - [10] Originally by: Naughty Boy * Capital Nosferatu * Anti-nosferatu defense * we need anti-nos mod * Nos Penalty in Developmnent * Nosferatu and PVP * Nos/Neuts * Nos? * Nos stacking penalty? Sincerly Yours, The Naughty Boy. My thoughts exactly. Official Nos Troll
Malthros Zenobia	Posted - 2006.01.27 19:36:00 - [11] Originally by: Pam wedghjmo maybe these things can be made more like turrets with an optimal range, fall off, and trackingspeed No. As much as I'd love to be able to orbit a BS at close range and avoid the NOS, no. Originally by: Istvaan Shogaatsu I'm probably one of the biggest Bush fanboys in Eve... This is like, Darth Vader, can't-reach-climax-without-killing-a-puppy evil.
Iagen	Posted - 2006.01.27 19:50:00 - [12] nos = lose high slot(s) = fewer guns. There's your balance trade off. Slower damage for mroe control of your foe.
BigJim Beef	Posted - 2006.01.27 19:53:00 - [13] Originally by: Tachy All weapons but >small< projectiles and missile launchers use cap. Qft. People don't realise that med projectiles take 1 cap per shot, which on autocannons is actually quite a lot, especially if you've just had all your cap sucked out.
Necrologic	Posted - 2006.01.27 20:00:00 - [14] Originally by: Iagen nos = lose high slot(s) = fewer guns. There's your balance trade off. Slower damage for mroe control of your foe. Wrong. Most ships have more highslots than they have primary weapon slots. If you have no bonuses to a seconday weapon, a nosferatu is far more powerful, so you lose no damage. You actually gain some effective damage alot of the time. For example, if you are flying a tempest. 6x autos and 2x heavy nos break tanks just as well if not better than 6x autos and 2x torps, and the nos protect agaisnt small targets and boosts your cap as well. Even though they do not actually do damage, they shut off tanks and so do effective damage. They also shut off offense and boost your cap and so defense, so they effectivly do alot more than damage. Official Nos Troll
Har Ganeth	Posted - 2006.01.27 20:02:00 - [15] There's nothing stopping the smaller ship from using EW - sensor damps to reduce the max range of the bigger ship would probably be more effective than hoping to get lucky with jammers unless you're in a crow.
Sharies	Posted - 2006.01.27 20:03:00 - [16] Originally by: BigJim Beef Originally by: Tachy All weapons but >small< projectiles and missile launchers use cap. Qft. People don't realise that med projectiles take 1 cap per shot, which on autocannons is actually quite a lot, especially if you've just had all your cap sucked out. Maybe you shoulda brought more people. It's not like he can nos everyone. Also energy destabilizers drain his energy too. making it so they cant tank as well. http://miniprofile.xfire.com/bg/sf/type/2/moonshade.png
Necrologic	Posted - 2006.01.27 20:05:00 - [17] Originally by: Har Ganeth There's nothing stopping the smaller ship from using EW - sensor damps to reduce the max range of the bigger ship would probably be more effective than hoping to get lucky with jammers unless you're in a crow. With what, your 1 free medslot? A few damps are not going to bring his lock range down enough, especially not with them being broken. To jam him you'd need a frig fleet, and those arn't going to have trouble with 1 bs anyway. Official Nos Troll
Sharies	Posted - 2006.01.27 20:17:00 - [18] Originally by: Necrologic Originally by: Har Ganeth There's nothing stopping the smaller ship from using EW - sensor damps to reduce the max range of the bigger ship would probably be more effective than hoping to get lucky with jammers unless you're in a crow. With what, your 1 free medslot? A few damps are not going to bring his lock range down enough, especially not with them being broken. To jam him you'd need a frig fleet, and those arn't going to have trouble with 1 bs anyway. So in your mind a couple frigs should be able to easily beat a battleship. I'll have some of whatever your smoking. http://miniprofile.xfire.com/bg/sf/type/2/moonshade.png
Imorta Dragul	Posted - 2006.01.27 20:19:00 - [19] Edited by: Imorta Dragul on 27/01/2006 20:22:26 Edited by: Imorta Dragul on 27/01/2006 20:21:57 Originally by: BigJim Beef Originally by: Tachy All weapons but >small< projectiles and missile launchers use cap. Qft. People don't realise that med projectiles take 1 cap per shot, which on autocannons is actually quite a lot, especially if you've just had all your cap sucked out. 220mm Medium 'Scout' Autocannon I 220mm Medium Gallium I Machine Gun ect ect ect the standart t1 and t2's cost cap, not the named. so small and medium can be without cap cost
Elaina Cosengo	Posted - 2006.01.27 20:34:00 - [20] Neuts stink anyone who uses them are morons (ends rant)
Necrologic	Posted - 2006.01.27 20:36:00 - [21] Originally by: Sharies Originally by: Necrologic Originally by: Har Ganeth There's nothing stopping the smaller ship from using EW - sensor damps to reduce the max range of the bigger ship would probably be more effective than hoping to get lucky with jammers unless you're in a crow. With what, your 1 free medslot? A few damps are not going to bring his lock range down enough, especially not with them being broken. To jam him you'd need a frig fleet, and those arn't going to have trouble with 1 bs anyway. So in your mind a couple frigs should be able to easily beat a battleship. I'll have some of whatever your smoking. I never said that, so don't put words into my mouth please. Battleships should be able to easily tank a couple frigs, or if they are using a fleet setup should't be alone and so it isn't a problem. A frig should not kill a battleship, but a battleship that is not setup as anti frig should not kill a frig either. Nos is an overpowered module because you can fit a setup that works perfectly against other battleships and will also own frigs thanks to the nos. Any other size of ship or class of module is only effective against 1 or 2 ship sizes. For example, if a frigate wants to fight another frigate you probably want a web, probably short range weapons, etc. But if the frigate wants to fight a battleship, it must fit a disrupter, and the mods to sustain it and probably a mwd too, and bring friends. But a battleship can have a compleatly anti bs setup and still own frigs. Official Nos Troll
Countess Kaladan	Posted - 2006.01.27 20:41:00 - [22] This is ridiculous, so what if NOS are too powerful, so are a lot of other weapons. I don't complain about cruise missiles every time I get ganked from one, or about heavy guns. There are ways to counter NOS, and there are ways to defend yourself against other weapons. Quit complaining about weapons set ups, and if you are upset about it, you should stop tackling battleships with smaller ships.
Necrologic	Posted - 2006.01.27 20:42:00 - [23] Originally by: Countess Kaladan This is ridiculous, so what if NOS are too powerful, so are a lot of other weapons. I don't complain about cruise missiles every time I get ganked from one, or about heavy guns. There are ways to counter NOS, and there are ways to defend yourself against other weapons. Quit complaining about weapons set ups, and if you are upset about it, you should stop tackling battleships with smaller ships. Please enlighten me on how i can counter nos? And don't bother saying cap boosters. There is also more to combat than tackling. Official Nos Troll
Sharies	Posted - 2006.01.27 20:42:00 - [24] Originally by: Necrologic Originally by: Sharies Originally by: Necrologic Originally by: Har Ganeth There's nothing stopping the smaller ship from using EW - sensor damps to reduce the max range of the bigger ship would probably be more effective than hoping to get lucky with jammers unless you're in a crow. With what, your 1 free medslot? A few damps are not going to bring his lock range down enough, especially not with them being broken. To jam him you'd need a frig fleet, and those arn't going to have trouble with 1 bs anyway. So in your mind a couple frigs should be able to easily beat a battleship. I'll have some of whatever your smoking. I never said that, so don't put words into my mouth please. Battleships should be able to easily tank a couple frigs, or if they are using a fleet setup should't be alone and so it isn't a problem. A frig should not kill a battleship, but a battleship that is not setup as anti frig should not kill a frig either. Nos is an overpowered module because you can fit a setup that works perfectly against other battleships and will also own frigs thanks to the nos. Any other size of ship or class of module is only effective against 1 or 2 ship sizes. For example, if a frigate wants to fight another frigate you probably want a web, probably short range weapons, etc. But if the frigate wants to fight a battleship, it must fit a disrupter, and the mods to sustain it and probably a mwd too, and bring friends. But a battleship can have a compleatly anti bs setup and still own frigs. Ok so in your mind a ship should only be setup to have one specific purpose even if it is a much larger ship and shouldn't be able to be setup to handle a wide range of situations. Listen if you want to go play paper rock scissors thatÆs fine this game is a little more complex then that. Of course I can see the forum boards for that game "paper doesn't beat rock, rock smashes through it nerf the paper. http://miniprofile.xfire.com/bg/sf/type/2/moonshade.png
Naughty Boy	Posted - 2006.01.27 20:43:00 - [25] Originally by: Countess Kaladan you should stop tackling battleships with smaller ships. That's going to be simple then... ...what's the role of small ships again? I mean, something that isn't done better by anything bigger? Sincerly Yours, The Naughty Boy. ---
Necrologic	Posted - 2006.01.27 20:45:00 - [26] Edited by: Necrologic on 27/01/2006 20:45:37 Originally by: Sharies Originally by: Necrologic Originally by: Sharies Originally by: Necrologic Originally by: Har Ganeth There's nothing stopping the smaller ship from using EW - sensor damps to reduce the max range of the bigger ship would probably be more effective than hoping to get lucky with jammers unless you're in a crow. With what, your 1 free medslot? A few damps are not going to bring his lock range down enough, especially not with them being broken. To jam him you'd need a frig fleet, and those arn't going to have trouble with 1 bs anyway. So in your mind a couple frigs should be able to easily beat a battleship. I'll have some of whatever your smoking. I never said that, so don't put words into my mouth please. Battleships should be able to easily tank a couple frigs, or if they are using a fleet setup should't be alone and so it isn't a problem. A frig should not kill a battleship, but a battleship that is not setup as anti frig should not kill a frig either. Nos is an overpowered module because you can fit a setup that works perfectly against other battleships and will also own frigs thanks to the nos. Any other size of ship or class of module is only effective against 1 or 2 ship sizes. For example, if a frigate wants to fight another frigate you probably want a web, probably short range weapons, etc. But if the frigate wants to fight a battleship, it must fit a disrupter, and the mods to sustain it and probably a mwd too, and bring friends. But a battleship can have a compleatly anti bs setup and still own frigs. Ok so in your mind a ship should only be setup to have one specific purpose even if it is a much larger ship and shouldn't be able to be setup to handle a wide range of situations. Listen if you want to go play paper rock scissors that?s fine this game is a little more complex then that. Of course I can see the forum boards for that game "paper doesn't beat rock, rock smashes through it nerf the paper. My mind? Sorry but no. CCP gave turrets tracking. CCP made missiles damage depend on sig rad and speed. CCP made the game. This is their logic, not mine. There has yet to be an official word from them regarding nos, and until there is i will continue to assume that they want to be consistant with their logic, and will continue to point out how nos does not meet that consistancy, and how it breaks currently established balance paradigms. Official Nos Troll
Necrologic	Posted - 2006.01.27 20:47:00 - [27] Originally by: Naughty Boy Originally by: Countess Kaladan you should stop tackling battleships with smaller ships. That's going to be simple then... ...what's the role of small ships again? I mean, something that isn't done better by anything bigger? Sincerly Yours, The Naughty Boy. "Look Naughty Boy! The NOS sign! To the nerf mobile!" Official Nos Troll
LUKEC	Posted - 2006.01.27 20:52:00 - [28] no... I just tried today: t2 light drone from gallente dread... could not do **** vs taranis, even if i stayed still or moved around. It missed like 75%. When they fix drones to keep range, not orbit, then maybe they will be overpowered. Atm we need antifrig fleet defence. If you think that vampadomi can kill 3 hacs... meh, it cant. I use no guns... i smack to death.
Sharies	Posted - 2006.01.27 20:58:00 - [29] Edited by: Sharies on 27/01/2006 21:04:57 Edited by: Sharies on 27/01/2006 21:02:09 All of those things are different maybe CCP feels NOS are perfect and need no changes and since that is the way nos works it must be CCP's will. Who are you to set what is the paradigm? There are plenty of other ways to beat a nos: bring more ships, fight long range, jam them... I quess what I'm trying to say is dont bring a knife to a gun fight. Your tactics failed change your tactics. http://miniprofile.xfire.com/bg/sf/type/2/moonshade.png
Naughty Boy	Posted - 2006.01.27 21:04:00 - [30] Edited by: Naughty Boy on 27/01/2006 21:06:30 Originally by: Sharies All of those things are different maybe CCP feels NOS are perfect and need no changes and since that is the way nos works it must be CCP's will. Who are you to set what is the current paradigm? In general, that's very short, because CCP changed their game many times, and might still be willing to change it... after all. @Lukec. I think there's a difference between tweaking a mod/introducing different version with different specialized roles and nerfing it to "uselessness". I don't see anything wrong in discussing how it could be tweaked. Anyway... fades away Sincerly Yours, The Naughty Boy. ---

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.