|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

baltec1
172
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 22:23:00 -
[1] - Quote
I would wait till we can test them before kicking off. |

baltec1
172
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 00:02:00 -
[2] - Quote
Cailais wrote:Imawuss wrote:Just curious if any devs are reading that dev blog thread and if they actually plan on participating like was stated they would. Becuase as it stands about 99% do not like what was proposed. Probably safe to say that the 99% you speak of are gallente ship pilots so theyre hardly likely to settle for anything less than "OMGBBQ!!1!!1!" ? Let's see how they play out on SISI before leaping to judgements. C.
As a gal pilot I have to say no. Its most likely the people who never use blasters. |

baltec1
173
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 00:36:00 -
[3] - Quote
Sebastian N Cain wrote:Metis Laxon wrote:<3 hybrid changes.
Clearly I am part of the 1% D: I am the problem. Come out of hiding 99% and make me pay you money for my appreciation of the fantastic hybrid changes. hybrids are impossible to fix, take them out of the game. the proposed changes are proving me right.
Yea, blasters are so useless I decided to spend the last year using them almost exclusivly and laughed as ship after ship burned up under my neutron blasters pitifull firepower. |

baltec1
174
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 09:36:00 -
[4] - Quote
Sebastian N Cain wrote: Oh sure, people will use less effective weaponry simply because they like the ship or whatever, in a game you also want to have fun and flying in a ship whose design is especially appealing to you contributes to it. But as soon as you enter pvp against competent opponents, you lose 9/10 times, and that 1 time you will win only because everybody will sooner or later make mistakes, therefore allowing you a victory.
I know that you like yourself a nano-blastermega. Since armortanked megas are far, far more common, people will underestimate your speed and agility seriously and therefore getting easily into blasterrange.
But the deciding factor is not the quality of your weapons or the ship or even your piloting skills, it is simply information warfare: wrong assumptions will lead to wrong decisions in battle.
Against a competent opponent that allows for the possibility of more unusual fits you are toast.
My current mega is now 3 months old and I am now in a position where every FC welcomes her and the general assumption is the mega will most likely survive on every roam. This 9/10 rubbish is compleatly unfounded. It doesnt matter how competent a drake pilot is when a single good volly rips off 1/3 of their sheilds. |

baltec1
176
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 00:23:00 -
[5] - Quote
Sebastian N Cain wrote:
Well, i-Śm happy for you but people flying around in battleships with lasers and projectiles are quite confident that their weapons are actually a danger for other battleships as well. And they will tear you apart 9 times out of 10. Because you will be already dead before you come close enough to do damage.
Yea this didnt happen the last time I ran into a gang of abaddons or any of the other BS I have run into over the last few months. Infact, looking back to my last hyperions untimely death I managed to get in range and take down several BS. Turns out that most fights happen within 20km of a gate which is well within range of my guns.
Perhaps you should fly these ships before spouting you're drival on the forums. |
|
|
|