| Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |

Rose Hips
Zero Dot Zero
393
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 14:33:00 -
[1] - Quote
Another patch
No documentation (feeling like 2010)
No complaints?
Ah... that's why they wanted the new Launcher, so the players would not notice or become tired of these little patches. Forum signature removed by Empress Jamyl as instructed by God Tò+püä jamyl sarum tÜçsÉÄpâ¬péñpâû |

Lazy Eagle
FUITA
8
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 14:44:00 -
[2] - Quote
Posting in stealth, stealth patch thread....... well not so stealthy, i guess. |

Rose Hips
Zero Dot Zero
393
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 14:45:00 -
[3] - Quote
I love the humor... but the answer is not acceptable.
CCP Falcon wrote:Schmata Bastanold wrote:Care to reveal what was in that mystery patch? Kittens 
This is like CCP of 2010 during the non-documentation era to which they recovered but now seem to be going back to their bad habit. Come on CCP you made progress in communicating, DON'T GO BACKWARDS. Forum signature removed by Empress Jamyl as instructed by God Tò+püä jamyl sarum tÜçsÉÄpâ¬péñpâû |

Treborr MintingtonJr
The Knights of Spamalot The Methodical Alliance
23
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 14:52:00 -
[4] - Quote
Rose Hips wrote:I love the humor... but the answer is not acceptable. CCP Falcon wrote:Schmata Bastanold wrote:Care to reveal what was in that mystery patch? Kittens  This is like CCP of 2010 during the non-documentation era to which they recovered but now seem to be going back to their bad habit. Come on CCP you made progress in communicating, DON'T GO BACKWARDS. Swear down if there are kittens in my captains quarters I'm never boarding my ship ever again! |
|

CCP Falcon
4393

|
Posted - 2013.10.30 14:56:00 -
[5] - Quote
Treborr MintingtonJr wrote:Rose Hips wrote:I love the humor... but the answer is not acceptable. CCP Falcon wrote:Schmata Bastanold wrote:Care to reveal what was in that mystery patch? Kittens  This is like CCP of 2010 during the non-documentation era to which they recovered but now seem to be going back to their bad habit. Come on CCP you made progress in communicating, DON'T GO BACKWARDS. Swear down if there are kittens in my captains quarters I'm never boarding my ship ever again!
I know, right! 
For those few people who were upset that there weren't actually any kittens included (we decided to keep them all in the office because they were so cute), I can offer another explanation.
When we put out tiny patches like this, they are of course documented internally, but if they're small back end fixes and optimizations that provide no change in gameplay then no patch notes are provided.

CCP Falcon -á || -á EVE Community Team -á || -á EVE Illuminati -á || -á Live Events Organizer
@CCP_Falcon -á || -á-á@EVE_LiveEvents |
|

Caviar Liberta
Moira. Villore Accords
195
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 14:57:00 -
[6] - Quote
Rose Hips wrote:Another patch
No documentation (feeling like 2010)
No complaints?
Ah... that's why they wanted the new Launcher, so the players would not notice or become tired of these little patches.
I believe by clicking play you accept the EULA. Somewhere in the EULA it says CCP can modify their software when they want to, with or without notification. |

Jove Death
Jovian Vengeance
144
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 14:59:00 -
[7] - Quote
I would have used a couple of tazmanian devils to sort the hamsters out.
Anyway if your still about falcon why when there is a patch like the past couple of weeks is it always the same size?. Is there somthing your specifically updating or is this the super sekret sauce?  Quoting "you will die" in EvE is fail Chars dont die in EvE. Unless you have a heart attack eek
|

March rabbit
True Horde
842
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 15:01:00 -
[8] - Quote
Caviar Liberta wrote:Rose Hips wrote:Another patch
No documentation (feeling like 2010)
No complaints?
Ah... that's why they wanted the new Launcher, so the players would not notice or become tired of these little patches. I believe by clicking play you accept the EULA. Somewhere in the EULA it says CCP can modify their software when they want to, with or without notification. you crazy? 
READING EULA???? |

Tikitina
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
82
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 15:02:00 -
[9] - Quote
Rose Hips wrote:Another patch
No documentation (feeling like 2010)
No complaints?
Ah... that's why they wanted the new Launcher, so the players would not notice or become tired of these little patches.
No complaints here. |

Xearal
Black Thorne Corporation Black Thorne Alliance
699
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 15:03:00 -
[10] - Quote
CCP Falcon wrote:Treborr MintingtonJr wrote:Rose Hips wrote:I love the humor... but the answer is not acceptable. CCP Falcon wrote:Schmata Bastanold wrote:Care to reveal what was in that mystery patch? Kittens  This is like CCP of 2010 during the non-documentation era to which they recovered but now seem to be going back to their bad habit. Come on CCP you made progress in communicating, DON'T GO BACKWARDS. Swear down if there are kittens in my captains quarters I'm never boarding my ship ever again! I know, right!  For those few people who were upset that there weren't actually any kittens included (we decided to keep them all in the office because they were so cute), I can offer another explanation. When we put out tiny patches like this, they are of course documented internally, but if they're small back end fixes and optimizations that provide no change in gameplay then no patch notes are provided. 
Falcon, maybe a silly suggestion, but in cases like this, a 'patch note' with a single line saying 'backend stuff improved' would help greatly, because even if it's a 'non patch' patch, where nothing gets changed that directly concerns players, having a note telling them nothing has changed for them would be very communicative ;)
|

Rose Hips
Zero Dot Zero
393
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 15:04:00 -
[11] - Quote
CCP Falcon wrote:When we put out tiny patches like this, they are of course documented internally, but if they're small back end fixes and optimizations that provide no change in gameplay then no patch notes are provided. 
So dear sir, the answer is simply:
Patch #xxxx-xxx Small back end fixes and optimizations that provide no change in gameplay.
or
Patch #xxxx-xxx Updates for Dust514 back end fixes and optimizations.
Because that is better than nothing and for those of us that keeps tabs on the game, patches, and all then (AS CCP SAYS) we are vested partners in this process. Please don't defend a non-documentation "it's minor" policy!!! Forum signature removed by Empress Jamyl as instructed by God Tò+püä jamyl sarum tÜçsÉÄpâ¬péñpâû |

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
1972
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 15:05:00 -
[12] - Quote
Heh.
Some of us know at least one of the reasons behind the patch. If you do a little research, you may find out.
That change isn't one which affects you directly. Just architecture work. Steve Ronuken for CSM 9!-á I'm starting early :) Handy tools and an SDE conversion Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |

Tikitina
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
82
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 15:06:00 -
[13] - Quote
March rabbit wrote:you crazy?  READING EULA????
Actually, scientific experiments have determined that All software EULAs basically say that you are responsible for everything that happens after you click the install button. All software companies guarantees essentially end at that point.
And no, I don't have links to such experiments or their findings. I found it on the internets.
|
|

CCP Stillman
C C P C C P Alliance
666

|
Posted - 2013.10.30 15:14:00 -
[14] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:Heh.
Some of us know at least one of the reasons behind the patch. If you do a little research, you may find out.
That change isn't one which affects you directly. Just architecture work.
And I may add that there was other stuff in the patch, but none of it you guys will ever see, because they are all internal changes.
Mind you, we patch several times a week. Most of the time it's never noticeable unless a mistake is made. Most often it's just tiny fixes and internal tooling improvements. If we put out patch-notes for that every time, you could get weeks with 3 patch-notes that just say "Internal changes and improvements". 
Just a random dude in Team Security. |
|

Winchester Steele
176
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 15:18:00 -
[15] - Quote
Rose Hips wrote:I love the humor... but the answer is not acceptable. CCP Falcon wrote:Schmata Bastanold wrote:Care to reveal what was in that mystery patch? Kittens  This is like CCP of 2010 during the non-documentation era to which they recovered but now seem to be going back to their bad habit. Come on CCP you made progress in communicating, DON'T GO BACKWARDS.
Entitled much?
I'm amazed at how tolerant CCP devs are towards people like you. It's their game, their code, their hardware... They don't owe you jack **** for explanation. Hth. ... |

Jake Warbird
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
3374
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 15:19:00 -
[16] - Quote
Came expecting afk cloakers to be patched, left disappointed. |

Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E.
2239
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 15:24:00 -
[17] - Quote
CCP Stillman wrote:....... And I may add that there was other stuff in the patch, but none of it you guys will ever see, because they are all internal changes.
............
What? Are you saying that every single eve player is locked out from applying to CCP for a job? http://vincentoneve.wordpress.com/ |

Pak Narhoo
Splinter Foundation
1133
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 15:25:00 -
[18] - Quote
Xearal wrote:[Falcon, maybe a silly suggestion, but in cases like this, a 'patch note' with a single line saying 'backend stuff improved' would help greatly, because even if it's a 'non patch' patch, where nothing gets changed that directly concerns players, having a note telling them nothing has changed for them would be very communicative ;)
It's anything but a silly suggestion but it comes down to CCP doing some sort of communication and from where I sit it looks like we're back pre-incarna and communication being in the same sentence with CCP equals to an oxymoron.
Take for example this thread, a question about CCP promising 10 year old vets a station of their own: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=284509 CCP responses to that, zero.zero and it was not the first time there was a polite inquiry to this fanfest promise with no response.
Another example is a two year old thread in the Macintosh section which hasn't seen a dev response in over a year https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1533341#post1533341 And if one of the posters is right CCP isn't even spending any time at fixing this 2 year problem simply since there is no-one put on the Mac client.
And I can go on but why bother, no one cares at CCP at the moment.  |
|

CCP Stillman
C C P C C P Alliance
667

|
Posted - 2013.10.30 15:25:00 -
[19] - Quote
Vincent Athena wrote:CCP Stillman wrote:....... And I may add that there was other stuff in the patch, but none of it you guys will ever see, because they are all internal changes.
............
What? Are you saying that every single eve player is locked out from applying to CCP for a job? Nope, if you join, then of course you'll get to see it.
We're hiring, by the way  Just a random dude in Team Security. |
|

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
1488
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 15:26:00 -
[20] - Quote
Rose Hips wrote:So dear sir, the answer is simply:
Patch #xxxx-xxx Small back end fixes and optimizations that provide no change in gameplay.
or
Patch #xxxx-xxx Updates for Dust514 back end fixes and optimizations.
Because that is better than nothing and for those of us that keeps tabs on the game, patches, and all then (AS CCP SAYS) we are vested partners in this process. Please don't defend a non-documentation "it's minor" policy!!! No thanks. I'll have my patch notes without pages and pages of "nothing changed" notes. How about this. If you see a patch, and it's not documented, you simply understand that it's nothing that required mentioning, and so nothing has changed. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Silvetica Dian
Manson Family Advent of Fate
264
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 15:26:00 -
[21] - Quote
Xearal wrote:
'backend stuff improved'
call it a preparation-H patch. here is a list of all the fiat currencies that didn't end up at zero value.....and here is a list of the places where a currency pegged to a real commodity has successfully co-existed with compound interest....-á Here is a physics professor explaining why sustainable growth isn't a thing http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-QA2rkpBSY |

Shederov Blood
Wrecketeers
548
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 15:27:00 -
[22] - Quote
CCP Stillman wrote:And I may add that there was other stuff in the patch, but none of it you guys will ever see, because they are all internal changes. Leaked footage.
|

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
1488
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 15:28:00 -
[23] - Quote
Pak Narhoo wrote:Xearal wrote:[Falcon, maybe a silly suggestion, but in cases like this, a 'patch note' with a single line saying 'backend stuff improved' would help greatly, because even if it's a 'non patch' patch, where nothing gets changed that directly concerns players, having a note telling them nothing has changed for them would be very communicative ;)
It's anything but a silly suggestion but it comes down to CCP doing some sort of communication and from where I sit it looks like we're back pre-incarna and communication being in the same sentence with CCP equals to an oxymoron. Take for example this thread, a question about CCP promising 10 year old vets a station of their own: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=284509CCP responses to that, zero.zero and it was not the first time there was a polite inquiry to this fanfest promise with no response. Another example is a two year old thread in the Macintosh section which hasn't seen a dev response in over a year https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1533341#post1533341And if one of the posters is right CCP isn't even spending any time at fixing this 2 year problem simply since there is no-one put on the Mac client. And I can go on but why bother, no one cares at CCP at the moment.  10 year vet station, to do what in? I'd rather they worked on content thanks.
And Macs suck, so who cares? The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Koban Agalder
Future Corps Sleeper Social Club
12
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 15:32:00 -
[24] - Quote
CCP Stillman wrote:We're hiring, by the way  Just out of curiosity, anything C++ related? James Arget for CSM 8!-áhttp://csm.fcftw.org-á |
|

CCP Stillman
C C P C C P Alliance
668

|
Posted - 2013.10.30 15:36:00 -
[25] - Quote
Koban Agalder wrote:CCP Stillman wrote:We're hiring, by the way  Just out of curiosity, anything C++ related? Looking at the list(http://www.ccpgames.com/en/jobs), it doesn't seem like it. Just a random dude in Team Security. |
|

Rose Hips
Zero Dot Zero
394
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 15:37:00 -
[26] - Quote
The fanbois are strong in this one... just bend over, you'll like it. Don't want to know, don't care, so what. Forum signature removed by Empress Jamyl as instructed by God Tò+püä jamyl sarum tÜçsÉÄpâ¬péñpâû |

Rose Hips
Zero Dot Zero
394
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 15:40:00 -
[27] - Quote
CCP Stillman wrote:Koban Agalder wrote:CCP Stillman wrote:We're hiring, by the way  Just out of curiosity, anything C++ related? Looking at the list(http://www.ccpgames.com/en/jobs), it doesn't seem like it.
Uh... how about this one...
http://www.ccpgames.com/en/jobs/job-details.aspx?jobid=470 Forum signature removed by Empress Jamyl as instructed by God Tò+püä jamyl sarum tÜçsÉÄpâ¬péñpâû |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
1490
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 15:57:00 -
[28] - Quote
Rose Hips wrote:CCP Stillman wrote:Koban Agalder wrote:CCP Stillman wrote:We're hiring, by the way  Just out of curiosity, anything C++ related? Looking at the list(http://www.ccpgames.com/en/jobs), it doesn't seem like it. Uh... how about this one... http://www.ccpgames.com/en/jobs/job-details.aspx?jobid=470 That's really strange! On my screen it says "Responsibilities include: Implement game features based on designs using our internal tools and Python"
I imagine you're looking at the bit that says strong programming ability required. I don't think the job is actually C++ related as that's not in the job description at all. Plus it's WoD... The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Solstice Project
I'm So Meta Even This Acronym
4231
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 16:11:00 -
[29] - Quote
Wow, so full of hatred and entitlement... |

Myrissa Kistel
Planetary Logistics
43
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 16:23:00 -
[30] - Quote
I just assume CCP is giving Goons stuff when these type of patches are released. |

War Kitten
Panda McLegion xXPlease Pandemic Citizens Reloaded Alliance.Xx
4665
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 16:36:00 -
[31] - Quote
Patch tears are the best.
They're so sour tasting - you get that bitter-puckerface that helps you imagine how self-wrongteous the OP must be feeling.
I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all. |

King Rothgar
Path of the Fallen
365
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 16:39:00 -
[32] - Quote
I logged out, immediately logged in again (changing toons) and suddenly an update then incompatible version. Tried it on two different machines, someone broke eve in the last 5 minutes. Fireworks and snowballs are great, but what I really want is a corpse launcher. |

Spurty
V0LTA Triumvirate.
1000
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 16:40:00 -
[33] - Quote
After this patch, clumps of fur were discovered by my keyboard and my mouse has teeth marks in it!
You SURE you kept all of the Kittens? GûÇGûêGûÇ GûêGûÇGûê GûÇGûêGûÇ-á-á-á-á-á GûêGûÇGûê GûêGûÇGûê GûêGûÇGûêGûÇGûê GûêGûæGûê GûæGûêGûæ GûêGûÇGûä GûæGûêGûæ-á-á-á-á-á GûêGûÇGûê GûêGûÇGûä GûêGûæGûêGûæGûê GûÇGûêGûÇ GûæGûÇGûæ GûÇGûæGûÇ GûÇGûÇGûÇGûæGûÇ GûÇGûæGûÇ GûÇGûæGûÇ GûÇGûæGûÇGûæGûÇ GûæGûÇGûæ |

Friendly Corpse
Empire Assault Corp Dead Terrorists
13
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 16:42:00 -
[34] - Quote
Incompatible version.
will check back after a few games of minesweeper. I love my lil box of matches..........yarr! |

Cyaron wars
SkREW CREW Local Down
60
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 16:44:00 -
[35] - Quote
Incompatible version!!!! No please apply proper patch that will actually FIX stuff rather then break it ok? |

Aliventi
Stimulus Rote Kapelle
529
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 16:45:00 -
[36] - Quote
CCP Stillman wrote:Nope, if you join, then of course you'll get to see it. We're hiring, by the way  Does CCP do summer internships? I never see anything like that posted on http://www.ccpgames.com/en/jobs. "tbh most people don't care about removing local from highsec. They want it gone from nullsec. I want to be able to solo roam hunt without everyone knowing I am there without them actually seeing me jump through the gate. Effortless intel is bad." ~Me |

Toshiro Ozuwara
SniggWaffe WAFFLES.
271
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 16:47:00 -
[37] - Quote
Incompatible build. Well done CCP. Diapers |

Jinx Jameson
Absolutely Priceless
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 16:54:00 -
[38] - Quote
Darn kittens, ruin my build ... back to playing with the scaled rifter |

Jove Death
Jovian Vengeance
150
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 16:54:00 -
[39] - Quote
CCP Stillman wrote: "Internal changes and improvements". 
You sobered Fozzie up then I guess
Quoting "you will die" in EvE is fail Chars dont die in EvE. Unless you have a heart attack eek
|

Ayesha Arkaral
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
16
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 17:23:00 -
[40] - Quote
The patch notes should say "We fixed an Oops!"  |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
3207
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 17:32:00 -
[41] - Quote
CCP Falcon wrote:Treborr MintingtonJr wrote:Rose Hips wrote:I love the humor... but the answer is not acceptable. CCP Falcon wrote:Schmata Bastanold wrote:Care to reveal what was in that mystery patch? Kittens  This is like CCP of 2010 during the non-documentation era to which they recovered but now seem to be going back to their bad habit. Come on CCP you made progress in communicating, DON'T GO BACKWARDS. Swear down if there are kittens in my captains quarters I'm never boarding my ship ever again! I know, right!  For those few people who were upset that there weren't actually any kittens included (we decided to keep them all in the office because they were so cute), I can offer another explanation. When we put out tiny patches like this, they are of course documented internally, but if they're small back end fixes and optimizations that provide no change in gameplay then no patch notes are provided. 
After hearing tales of how drunk CCP guys get during fan fest, I don't know if I want any of you guys working near my 'Bank End'...
|

Bubanni
ElitistOps Pandemic Legion
793
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 18:29:00 -
[42] - Quote
CCP Falcon wrote:Treborr MintingtonJr wrote:Rose Hips wrote:I love the humor... but the answer is not acceptable. CCP Falcon wrote:Schmata Bastanold wrote:Care to reveal what was in that mystery patch? Kittens  This is like CCP of 2010 during the non-documentation era to which they recovered but now seem to be going back to their bad habit. Come on CCP you made progress in communicating, DON'T GO BACKWARDS. Swear down if there are kittens in my captains quarters I'm never boarding my ship ever again! I know, right!  For those few people who were upset that there weren't actually any kittens included (we decided to keep them all in the office because they were so cute), I can offer another explanation. When we put out tiny patches like this, they are of course documented internally, but if they're small back end fixes and optimizations that provide no change in gameplay then no patch notes are provided. 
But but but.... sometimes, backend optimization could even cause bugs that you might not be aware of yourself, and by letting the players know what you changed, we become more aware if something is suddenly "buggier" than normal Supercap nerf - change ewar immunity https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=194759 Module activation delay! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1180934 |

KIller Wabbit
The Scope Gallente Federation
461
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 19:36:00 -
[43] - Quote
CCP Falcon wrote:Treborr MintingtonJr wrote:Rose Hips wrote:I love the humor... but the answer is not acceptable. CCP Falcon wrote:Schmata Bastanold wrote:Care to reveal what was in that mystery patch? Kittens  This is like CCP of 2010 during the non-documentation era to which they recovered but now seem to be going back to their bad habit. Come on CCP you made progress in communicating, DON'T GO BACKWARDS. Swear down if there are kittens in my captains quarters I'm never boarding my ship ever again! I know, right!  For those few people who were upset that there weren't actually any kittens included (we decided to keep them all in the office because they were so cute), I can offer another explanation. When we put out tiny patches like this, they are of course documented internally, but if they're small back end fixes and optimizations that provide no change in gameplay then no patch notes are provided. 
Except that one of your recent "no documentation needed" patches apparently broke the station hanger and item hanger stickyness, have to reopen after each login, yet again. And no - your persistent cache coherency failness doesn't appear to be the problem since a cache reset doesn't fix. Documenting at least a tad can help us help you when you've once again pointed the turret at the wrong body part.
CCP Punkturis-á "I want to get in on the goodposter circle jerk!"
|

Markus Navarro
Osmon Integrated Robotics
78
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 20:12:00 -
[44] - Quote
You guys may want to be more carefull, i don't remember Guristas insta locking drones before.
Seriously, kindly warn people. I sell drones and drones accessories. |

Jarod Garamonde
Sardaukar Merc Guild General Tso's Alliance
529
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 21:40:00 -
[45] - Quote
CCP Falcon wrote:Treborr MintingtonJr wrote:Rose Hips wrote:I love the humor... but the answer is not acceptable. CCP Falcon wrote:Schmata Bastanold wrote:Care to reveal what was in that mystery patch? Kittens  This is like CCP of 2010 during the non-documentation era to which they recovered but now seem to be going back to their bad habit. Come on CCP you made progress in communicating, DON'T GO BACKWARDS. Swear down if there are kittens in my captains quarters I'm never boarding my ship ever again! I know, right!  For those few people who were upset that there weren't actually any kittens included (we decided to keep them all in the office because they were so cute), I can offer another explanation. When we put out tiny patches like this, they are of course documented internally, but if they're small back end fixes and optimizations that provide no change in gameplay then no patch notes are provided. 
Confirming. I logged in, this morning, patch applied... used the time to make a bagel. Logged on with no issues. 3 adorable Maine Coon kittens in my CQ. One was brown marble, one was brown tabby, and the other was a grey tabby "cape and hood" with white underbody. They are quite adorable, and look just like my girlfriend and I's IRL cats when they were kittens. Thanks, CCP. That moment when you realize the crazy lady with all the cats was right... |

Oraac Ensor
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
294
|
Posted - 2013.10.31 22:43:00 -
[46] - Quote
CCP Stillman wrote:Mind you, we patch several times a week. Most of the time it's never noticeable unless a mistake is made. Most often it's just tiny fixes and internal tooling improvements. If we put out patch-notes for that every time, you could get weeks with 3 patch-notes that just say "Internal changes and improvements". And what would be wrong with that?
At least we would know that there's nothing for us to worry about.
Do it. |

Mac Munoz
Only One Corp
12
|
Posted - 2013.10.31 22:53:00 -
[47] - Quote
Oraac Ensor wrote:CCP Stillman wrote:Mind you, we patch several times a week. Most of the time it's never noticeable unless a mistake is made. Most often it's just tiny fixes and internal tooling improvements. If we put out patch-notes for that every time, you could get weeks with 3 patch-notes that just say "Internal changes and improvements". And what would be wrong with that? At least we would know that there's nothing for us to worry about. Do it.
Since they just stated that policy was to NOT document when there are internal changes, wouldn't one be able to deduce that if there are no patch notes that the changes are internal changes? Why waste time to satisfy a very small minorities OCD issues? |

TigerXtrm
Black Thorne Corporation Black Thorne Alliance
224
|
Posted - 2013.10.31 23:10:00 -
[48] - Quote
Winchester Steele wrote:Rose Hips wrote:I love the humor... but the answer is not acceptable. CCP Falcon wrote:Schmata Bastanold wrote:Care to reveal what was in that mystery patch? Kittens  This is like CCP of 2010 during the non-documentation era to which they recovered but now seem to be going back to their bad habit. Come on CCP you made progress in communicating, DON'T GO BACKWARDS. Entitled much? I'm amazed at how tolerant CCP devs are towards people like you. It's their game, their code, their hardware... They don't owe you jack **** for explanation. Hth.
This. People around here assume that just because they pay for gametime they get to submit a list 10 miles long with demands on how the game devs should be treating them. **** off, you're not entitled to jack. My YouTube Channel - EVE Tutorials & other game related things! |

Vyktor Abyss
The Abyss Corporation
357
|
Posted - 2013.10.31 23:12:00 -
[49] - Quote
CCP, I think your patch might have broken FW "gate sliding" again....
It is like of old where people landing on a fw plex gate and activating it became invulnerable....
Just today it seems even worse in that in Innia today we're seeing ships land that we target and scram (with like 20 points of scram strength) applying DPS, only to then see them slide into the FW plex.
You definately broke something. Cheers. |

Gizznitt Malikite
Agony Unleashed Agony Empire
2779
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 01:08:00 -
[50] - Quote
CCP Falcon wrote:For those few people who were upset that there weren't actually any kittens included (we decided to keep them all in the office because they were so cute), I can offer another explanation. When we put out tiny patches like this, they are of course documented internally, but if they're small back end fixes and optimizations that provide no change in gameplay then no patch notes are provided. 
CCP falcon... part of the stealth changes was to MJD's. MJD's not instantly decloak you when activated. This prevents players from performing the MJD-Cloak trick to navigate through hostile nullsec bubble camps (similar to MWD-cloak trick, but better).
This would absolutely constitute a "change in gameplay"!
p.s. I have a corp mate that lost their battleship attempting the maneuver, because of your undocumented "fixes and optimizations" that provide "no change in gameplay". |

Barrogh Habalu
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
553
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 05:18:00 -
[51] - Quote
Caviar Liberta wrote:I believe by clicking play you accept the EULA. Somewhere in the EULA it says CCP can modify their software when they want to, with or without notification. The fact that people accept EULA doesn't mean that they don't hope for CCP's good will to provide a little more than minimum. |

Jarod Garamonde
Sardaukar Merc Guild General Tso's Alliance
550
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 05:20:00 -
[52] - Quote
Barrogh Habalu wrote:Caviar Liberta wrote:I believe by clicking play you accept the EULA. Somewhere in the EULA it says CCP can modify their software when they want to, with or without notification. The fact that people accept EULA doesn't mean that they don't hope for CCP's good will to provide a little more than minimum.
Again, though.... and I *KNOW* I have said this before.... they asked us to stop RMT'ing and botting. Have we? I rest my friggin case. That moment when you realize the crazy lady with all the cats was right... |

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
1974
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 10:10:00 -
[53] - Quote
It should probably be noted:
Client side patches won't have anything to do with changes with gate sliding or cloaking changes with MJDs. That's a server side change. Steve Ronuken for CSM 9!-á I'm starting early :) Handy tools and an SDE conversion Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |

Tron 3K
Ship Spinning Industries
151
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 11:42:00 -
[54] - Quote
Rose Hips wrote:Another patch
No documentation (feeling like 2010)
No complaints?
Ah... that's why they wanted the new Launcher, so the players would not notice or become tired of these little patches. Confirming that people will ***** about everything even if it is possibly the dumbest thing to ***** about! |

YesYes NoNoNo
Karmic Rebalance
27
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 12:02:00 -
[55] - Quote
Myrissa Kistel wrote:I just assume CCP is giving Somer stuff when these type of patches are released.
Fixed your post...
|

Rose Hips
Zero Dot Zero
401
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 13:51:00 -
[56] - Quote
CCP Stillman wrote:And I may add that there was other stuff in the patch, but none of it you guys will ever see, because they are all internal changes. Mind you, we patch several times a week. Most of the time it's never noticeable unless a mistake is made. Most often it's just tiny fixes and internal tooling improvements. If we put out patch-notes for that every time, you could get weeks with 3 patch-notes that just say "Internal changes and improvements". 
Ah well here my dear Stillman you are not quite accurate. I have a troubled client. Because of CCP's woeful support of Mac client issues I have to manually patch my system EVERYTIME you release a patch. When a patch is released I click patch notes. In the past two years, only two stealth patches (3 counting this one now) were released and each time there were many on the forums that complained, and CCP did the right thing and posted followup patch notes for those two patches with a brief statement like "There was nothing of importance, just DUST514 fixes, here are your patch notes" and all was good.
So no sir... we do not get 3 patch-notes every (unstated interval) time. Please don't defend this because you at CCP have done good the last few years since 2010. Don't go back to bad IT habits. Forum signature removed by Empress Jamyl as instructed by God Tò+püä jamyl sarum tÜçsÉÄpâ¬péñpâû |

Lugalbandak
Anunnaku Industrial Corp. Northern Associates.
231
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 14:37:00 -
[57] - Quote
CCP Stillman wrote:Vincent Athena wrote:CCP Stillman wrote:....... And I may add that there was other stuff in the patch, but none of it you guys will ever see, because they are all internal changes.
............
What? Are you saying that every single eve player is locked out from applying to CCP for a job? Nope, if you join, then of course you'll get to see it. We're hiring, by the way 
im good with cold weather and making coffee , any job offers for me? The police horse is the only animal in the world that haz his male genitals on his back |

Kinis Deren
The Nyan Cat Pirates Disband.
196
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 17:49:00 -
[58] - Quote
A patch a day keeps the botters away.  |

Rekkr Nordgard
The Ardency of Faith Filthy Bastards
47
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 18:02:00 -
[59] - Quote
Opened thread expecting to find someone claiming one these "backend" patches had messed with gameplay, CCP denying it, and then CCP being proved wrong; was not disappointed. |

Burl en Daire
The Ecstatic Cult of Dionysus Trifectas Syndicate
17
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 18:31:00 -
[60] - Quote
Caviar Liberta wrote:Rose Hips wrote:Another patch
No documentation (feeling like 2010)
No complaints?
Ah... that's why they wanted the new Launcher, so the players would not notice or become tired of these little patches. I believe by clicking play you accept the EULA. Somewhere in the EULA it says CCP can modify their software when they want to, with or without notification.
I found the winner. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |