EVE Search - [Rubicon] T3 Subsystem re-fitting in space

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Test Server Feedback

[Rubicon] T3 Subsystem re-fitting in space

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 8 post(s)
HerrBert Semper Ubi Sub Ubi 138	Posted - 2013.11.04 14:06:00 - [31] - Quote Posted: 2013.11.04 13:37 CCP Paradox you troll.... My mind does not reflect my corp ... it just shows you what they care about... Super serious Wormhole Guy http://www.youtube.com/user/HerrBertism
D3m0n sam End-of-Line 1	Posted - 2013.11.04 14:07:00 - [32] - Quote <3 cookies for you :D
Omnathious Deninard Novis Initiis 1763	Posted - 2013.11.04 14:07:00 - [33] - Quote Anabaric wrote: Omnathious Deninard wrote: The Depot's inability to retain cargo once scooped makes it impractical to hold the subsystems there either. If the mobile depot were to only be able to hold modules, charges, drones, and subsystems but could retain them when scooped it may prove to be an effective change. Yes your right, that would make moving large volumes of stuff, magically contained in a tardis like structure so much easier. Of course, such a change would need to have an additional restriction of only allowing the cargo to be adjusted while deployed in space. In the cargohold of your ship or in station the cargohold would be inaccessible. Novis Initiis is Recruting-á --á Ideas for Drone Improvement
Koban Agalder Future Corps Sleeper Social Club 12	Posted - 2013.11.04 14:08:00 - [34] - Quote Is there official statement about T3 and rigs problem? James Arget for CSM 8!-áhttp://csm.fcftw.org-á
Noriko Mai 1026	Posted - 2013.11.04 14:10:00 - [35] - Quote HerrBert wrote: Posted: 2013.11.04 13:37 CCP Paradox you troll.... hahaha good catch
Batelle Komm susser Tod 263	Posted - 2013.11.04 14:11:00 - [36] - Quote ermagerd. Fighting is Magic
Beffah Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion 25	Posted - 2013.11.04 14:14:00 - [37] - Quote awwwwww yisssssssssss

CCP Paradox 1087	Posted - 2013.11.04 14:14:00 - [38] - Quote Noriko Mai wrote: HerrBert wrote: Posted: 2013.11.04 13:37 CCP Paradox you troll.... hahaha good catch I'm as surprised as you are. Perhaps it was destined to happen. CCP Paradox \| EVE Quality Assurance \| Team Super Friends @CCP_Paradox

Delois Lunar B0rthole 1	Posted - 2013.11.04 14:15:00 - [39] - Quote Thank you... tear
Mai Khumm Carbon Circle 500	Posted - 2013.11.04 14:15:00 - [40] - Quote Wormholes just got less annoying... insert witty saying here

Charles Wu-Wong Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective 16	Posted - 2013.11.04 14:18:00 - [41] - Quote As someone who just got his first T3 intended for ninja site running, this is a very welcome change.
Setsune Rin Collapsed Out Shadow Cartel 101	Posted - 2013.11.04 14:19:00 - [42] - Quote next step: recoverable rigs from t3's when?
Kniht Long Range Foundation 36	Posted - 2013.11.04 14:21:00 - [43] - Quote Will we be able to assemble T3s in space? Doesn't sound like it, but that would make hauling them in so much easier.
Andrew Jester Jester's Hole 5	Posted - 2013.11.04 14:21:00 - [44] - Quote Oh thank god

CCP Paradox 1089	Posted - 2013.11.04 14:22:00 - [45] - Quote Kniht wrote: Will we be able to assemble T3s in space? Doesn't sound like it, but that would make hauling them in so much easier. They still need to be assembled in station. CCP Paradox \| EVE Quality Assurance \| Team Super Friends @CCP_Paradox

Malleus Sicarius 0utLaw. Northern Coalition. 1	Posted - 2013.11.04 14:31:00 - [46] - Quote OH YESSS, thats exactly what eve neeeds ... no we dont need you guys to figure a way to fix the unplayable game in 10% tidi ... and the module cicling bugs .. nooo we need to change the subsistems in space .. not sure if its gonna work on 10% tidi .. the only problem that eve have at this point ... and thats the main issue that ccp need to fix at this game .... GG CCP ...i rly want to hear how u fix the lag and tidi issue ..
Melisandre Freewoman Junk United Corporation Junk Alliance 25	Posted - 2013.11.04 14:35:00 - [47] - Quote Malleus Sicarius wrote: OH YESSS, thats exactly what eve neeeds ... no we dont need you guys to figure a way to fix the unplayable game in 10% tidi ... and the module cicling bugs .. nooo we need to change the subsistems in space .. not sure if its gonna work on 10% tidi .. the only problem that eve have at this point ... and thats the main issue that ccp need to fix at this game .... GG CCP ...i rly want to hear how u fix the lag and tidi issue .. Ass.
Xen Solarus Inner 5phere 604	Posted - 2013.11.04 14:37:00 - [48] - Quote Very nice, good work! Post with your main, like a BOSS!
thee lous3 RedBox inc. Unicorn Collective 20	Posted - 2013.11.04 14:37:00 - [49] - Quote Much love.
Altrue Exploration Frontier inc 675	Posted - 2013.11.04 14:38:00 - [50] - Quote Malleus Sicarius wrote: OH YESSS, thats exactly what eve neeeds ... no we dont need you guys to figure a way to fix the unplayable game in 10% tidi ... and the module cicling bugs .. nooo we need to change the subsistems in space .. not sure if its gonna work on 10% tidi .. the only problem that eve have at this point ... and thats the main issue that ccp need to fix at this game .... GG CCP ...i rly want to hear how u fix the lag and tidi issue .. Lol. You're compring a lack (on military grade hardware I remind you) of raw processing power to one of the little things that the community asked for. G££ <= Me

Jack Miton Semper Ubi Sub Ubi 2396	Posted - 2013.11.04 14:41:00 - [51] - Quote it's only 3 years too late, but better late then never i suppose... Stuck In Here With Me:-á http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/
Lazarus Telraven Amok. Goonswarm Federation 44	Posted - 2013.11.04 14:42:00 - [52] - Quote This is a pretty bad idea. You have now influenced the meta so that EVERY null alliance will only fly Tech3s and use a small pos to refit after bridging into a system. People build supers in dead end systems for the fact that it has one gate and you have a single point to defend to keep attackers out. The use of cynojammers in sov wars has always been a strategic option to stop subcap fleets from bridging ahead or to pull back and take a fight one jump behind you where there is a jammer so that you can have the advantage.
Angelus Ryan One Ronin 45	Posted - 2013.11.04 14:43:00 - [53] - Quote Aww Yiss. Excellent work CCP Paradox and Co.
Thorn Galen Bene Gesserit ChapterHouse Sanctuary Pact 1336	Posted - 2013.11.04 14:43:00 - [54] - Quote No, this is not a bad idea. This is a great idea, thank you o/ Personnel Division Director - Bene Gesserit Chapterhouse CEO Sanctuary Pact Alliance --áSanctuary Pact
Sklullus Dromulus B0rthole 3	Posted - 2013.11.04 14:45:00 - [55] - Quote Aww Yis. <3 Twitter: @Sklullus
Ix Method Barrington-Smythe Victory War Goodness 54	Posted - 2013.11.04 14:54:00 - [56] - Quote CCP Paradox wrote: So please do so and provide any feedback that you have. Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay. Thank you. That is all. Travelling at the speed of love.
Kalel Nimrott Sky Fighters 405	Posted - 2013.11.04 14:56:00 - [57] - Quote CCP Masterplan wrote: With this and the SMA loot drop change, Rubicon is shaping up to be the best wormhole expansion since Apocrypha :) You meant the only wormhole expansion, right?
Maximus Aerelius PROPHET OF ENIGMA 788	Posted - 2013.11.04 14:57:00 - [58] - Quote These people: Malleus Sicarius wrote: OH YESSS, thats exactly what eve neeeds ... no we dont need you guys to figure a way to fix the unplayable game in 10% tidi ... and the module cicling bugs .. nooo we need to change the subsistems in space .. not sure if its gonna work on 10% tidi .. the only problem that eve have at this point ... and thats the main issue that ccp need to fix at this game .... GG CCP ...i rly want to hear how u fix the lag and tidi issue .. Lazarus Telraven wrote: This is a pretty bad idea. Who obviously didn't bother vote on the CSM's list of "99 Reasonable Things": CCP Paradox wrote: Therefore Team Super Friends would like to thank your friendly CSM for providing their reasonable things list. With this list it was helpful to prioritize what features you wanted the most. (So hug a CSM member and continue to support them!) Vote or STFU. The community obviously wanted this change (the ones that could be arsed to vote that is) and the CSM pushed CCP. CCP listened and voila a change that was asked for by the community. I for one am thankful to the CSM for pushing this and to CCP for continuing to listen to us via our elected bodies on the CSM. Oh and Malleus Sicarius, TiDi was brought in to combat lag so at 10% TiDi it's seems is working as you weren't CTD'd but were still connected. Fast Character Switching "XP Stylee" Undocking - More Routes Out of Station Here's my tear jar > \|_\| < Fill 'er up!
Vyger S0utherN Comfort Against ALL Authorities 4	Posted - 2013.11.04 14:58:00 - [59] - Quote Omnathious Deninard wrote: once scooped makes it impractical to hold the subsystems there either. If the mobile depot were to only be able to hold modules, charges, drones, and subsystems but could retain them when scooped it may prove to be an effective change. You basically want to be able to scoop your depot and have it retain its cargo. In other words you want 3000m3 worth of stuff to fit in 50m3 worth of your ship's cargo hold. That doesn't seem completely ridiculous to you?

CCP Masterplan C C P C C P Alliance 1352	Posted - 2013.11.04 15:01:00 - [60] - Quote Schmata Bastanold wrote: Great. Also, is this one of those two mysterious projects that Jester was writing about with heavy NDA threat hanging over its detail being put in minutes? One of those projects supposed to be pretty earthshaking, other not so much. Personally I hope this change is just a preludium to earthshaking part :) No, I'm pretty sure those are still under wraps "This one time, on patch day..." CCP Masterplan -á\| -áTeam Five-0: Rewriting the law




Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.