EVE Search - Mass test feedback, November 4th

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Test Server Feedback

Mass test feedback, November 4th

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 2 post(s)
Caterpil Hippo Eats Dwarf Flappy Chickens With Teeth 27	Posted - 2013.11.04 18:16:00 - [91] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX version: DX11 OS version: Windows 7 Home Premium CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4670k CPU @ 3.40 GHz GPU: Nvidia Geforce GTX 670 RAM: 16GB How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): - Anti-Aliasing: None - Shader Quality: High - Texture Quality: High - LOD Quality: High User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot -25 (Zoomed out) Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - 20 (Zoomed in) Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? 8 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? Didn't notice it Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Fist jump took ages and initiated emergency warp upon entering system Random missiles and lasers appeared directed at my ship even though I wasn't being aggressed (this occasionally happens on TQ, but not as much as tonight) There appeared to be an issue with chat channels where upon switching channels all the text would take around 10 seconds to display.
Aken Thrawn Trask Industries Inc. 0	Posted - 2013.11.04 18:19:00 - [92] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): dx11 OS version: Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz (8 CPUs), ~3.4GHz GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 RAM: 8GB How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High - Anti-Aliasing: disabled - Shader Quality: High - Texture Quality: High - LOD Quality: High User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 15 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? 8 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? no Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: had more lag while hitting the POS (down to 5 fps) than while fighting at the gate. The only bugs I've noticed were chat related, like chat echo (write once, appears twice) and random lag while swiching tabs. I used MJD quite a few times and really had no delay and everything seemed smooth enough.
Maximus Powerz Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic 1	Posted - 2013.11.04 18:19:00 - [93] - Quote DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): 9 OS version: Windows 7 CPU: Intel Q6600 GPU: GeForce 8800 GT RAM: 8GB How many clients were you running at the same time? 2 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Medium - Anti-Aliasing: Disabled - Shader Quality: Medium - Texture Quality: Medium - LOD Quality: Low User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 8 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 6 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? I didn't notice it. Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
Cisco Basher Die Rentnergang V.e.G.A. 0	Posted - 2013.11.04 18:21:00 - [94] - Quote DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): 9 OS version: Win7-x64 SP1 CPU: i7-3520M CPU @ 2.90GHz GPU: Intel HD4000 RAM: 8 GB How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): - Anti-Aliasing: Disabled - Shader Quality: High - Texture Quality: High - LOD Quality: High User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 20 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 10 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? No Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Got poded, upgraded my clone, plugged in new chips. Skill queue is now messed up. It needs 30 seconds to show up and tell's me that I need as twice as much time to learn the current skill. Also I can not remap my skill attributes and I can not save the current mapping because of unassigned points.
train man Endgame Alliance End Game Alliance 0	Posted - 2013.11.04 18:23:00 - [95] - Quote DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): dx9 GÇó OS version: Win 7 GÇó CPU: i7 GÇó GPU: gtx480 GÇó RAM: 16G GÇó How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 GÇó Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high - Anti-Aliasing: high - Shader Quality:high - Texture Quality:high - LOD Quality:high User Experience GÇó Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (5=same) GÇó Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no GÇó We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? no
sh3wantstohurtyou Desert Pirates Cartel 0	Posted - 2013.11.04 18:23:00 - [96] - Quote DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): dx11 OS version: win7 CPU: i5 3120m GPU: GT640m 2gb RAM: 6gb How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): low - Anti-Aliasing: off - Shader Quality:low - Texture Quality:low - LOD Quality:low User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 7-14 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 2-4 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome)6 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? not crashing We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? no Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
Dinsdale Pirannha Pirannha Corp 1402	Posted - 2013.11.04 18:25:00 - [97] - Quote DirectX version : 9 OS version: Windows 7 CPU: Intel i5-3300 3.0 Ghz GPU: GFOrce 210 589 Mhz RAM: 4 G How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): low - Anti-Aliasing: Disabled - Shader Quality: Low - Texture Quality: Low - LOD Quality: Low User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 10 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: N/a Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? None We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? No Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: It was very little different that other fleet fights I have been in, since I usually fight zoomed out.
Mixim Fonulique Ratchet Industries Dark Aether 0	Posted - 2013.11.04 18:26:00 - [98] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): OS version: W 7 CPU:3.1 gig GPU: 512 mg RAM: 6 gig How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): medium - Anti-Aliasing: none - Shader Quality:low - Texture Quality:med - LOD Quality: med User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 12 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 3-5 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 9 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? a little but the trade was fair
maxx jules Endgame Alliance End Game Alliance 0	Posted - 2013.11.04 18:26:00 - [99] - Quote Machine Info and Settings GÇó DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): dx11 GÇó OS version: Win7 GÇó CPU: i7 GÇó GPU: gtx5xx 2x GÇó RAM: 16G GÇó How many clients were you running at the same time? 2 GÇó Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high - Anti-Aliasing: High - Shader Quality:High - Texture Quality:High - LOD Quality:High User Experience GÇó Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? 5 GÇó Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? 1 client DC GÇó We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience?no
Akmed Muhammed Widowmaker Ship Builders 0	Posted - 2013.11.04 18:26:00 - [100] - Quote running dx9 windows 8 ran somewhat slow I think it was due to the number of ships on the screen at one time and I didn't lose my harbinger or get podded YEAH

ninjawolf The Omega Directive. The Methodical Alliance 0	Posted - 2013.11.04 18:31:00 - [101] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): DX 11 OS version: Windows XP SP3 CPU: Intell 6800 Dual Core 1.8GhZ GPU: Can't remember Make / Model. 256mb dedicated Memory 1.5GB Shared RAM: 8GB How many clients were you running at the same time? 2 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Medium Tranquility, Low Singularity - Anti-Aliasing: N/A - Shader Quality: N/A - Texture Quality: N/A - LOD Quality: N/A User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 10 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 12 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) N/A Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? 1 Crash which resulted in disconnect. We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? No. Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Not much difference for me as fleet fights are done zoomed out for me. The fight became easier to view when Time Dilation kicked in.
Aiko Kurushio Conquering Darkness 0	Posted - 2013.11.04 18:35:00 - [102] - Quote DirectX version your client was running: DX9 OS version: Windows 7 Ultimate CPU: AMD Phenom II X6 1055T GPU: AMD Radeon HD 7950 RAM: 16GB DDR3 How many clients were you running at the same time? 2 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): - Anti-Aliasing: High - Shader Quality: High - Texture Quality: High - LOD Quality: High User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: ~20 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 7-10 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome): 6 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? Nope We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? Nope Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Everything ran smoothly, even if at somewhat low fps. I had all brackets on and was quite pleased with the fps I got
Za Or Irata III Trek Alliance 0	Posted - 2013.11.04 18:39:00 - [103] - Quote DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information):dx9 OS version:windows 7 CPU:intel dualcore 2.20ghz GPU:Nvidia geforce gts250 RAM:4gig How many clients were you running at the same time?1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): - Anti-Aliasing: high - Shader Quality:high - Texture Quality:high - LOD Quality:high Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - n/a Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - n/a Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 6 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? No. Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
DeadNite 2 Girls - 1 Corp 14	Posted - 2013.11.04 18:43:00 - [104] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): DX9 OS version: 6.1 (Build 7601: SP1) CPU: i7-3820QM GPU: 2x AMD 7970m (Crossfire active) RAM: 16GB DDR3 How many clients were you running at the same time?: 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): HIGH - Anti-Aliasing: Disabled - Shader Quality: High - Texture Quality: High - LOD Quality: High User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 20-25 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in:10-15 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome): 3 - The SiSi client always performs worse than TQ on my box it seems. Did you experience any disconnects or crashes?: No We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience?: No Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Was a good test a part from the fleet invitation problem and the system population caps.
Nam Dnilb Universal Frog 93	Posted - 2013.11.04 18:48:00 - [105] - Quote DirectX version your client was running: DX9 OS version: Windows 8 Pro CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad 9550 GPU: Nvidia Geforce GTX 660 RAM: 8GB DDR3 How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): - Anti-Aliasing: off - Shader Quality: High - Texture Quality: High - LOD Quality: High User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: ~7 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? No, nothing obvious. Mouse wheel response for zooming felt more sluggish though.
Rabalina LaFlema LeroLero Corp 0	Posted - 2013.11.04 19:26:00 - [106] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): Dx11 OS version: Win 7 CPU: Intel-« CoreGäó2 Quad CPU Q8200 @ 2.33GHz GPU: AMD Radeon HD 6450 RAM: 3gb How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Low - Anti-Aliasing: Disabled - Shader Quality: Low - Texture Quality: Low - LOD Quality: Low User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 10 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 3 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 3 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? Yes
Musashi Date 25TH miss 40	Posted - 2013.11.04 19:40:00 - [107] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): Running on DX9; the launcher settings says "! Your computer only supports DirectX 9" and the selection box has been greyed with DirectX9 in it. This was.. peculiar because my dxdiag clearly says I have DirectX 11 on. OS version:Win7 64bit CPU:Core2Duo [email protected] GPU:Radeon 4670 2Gb RAM:4Gb DDR2 How many clients were you running at the same time?Four clients Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): - Anti-Aliasing:Disabled - Shader Quality: Low - Texture Quality: Low - LOD Quality:Low User Experience Total Memory before Poitot jump: about ~600Mb Total Memory after Poitot jump: ~1,100Mb FPS went down to below 5fps during the fight, but CPU performance was around 45~55% and was really impressive. Some of my clients was just peaking near 50% utilization, and only the target caller (assigned sentries) peaked up to 95%~100% CPU. Working set size is 818Mb on the target caller, and 764~706Mb on the others. Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out:~5 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in:~5 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome)3 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No client crashed for this masstest We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? Oh so that was what I saw while zooming out on my ship, the muddied colors/textures definitely caught my attention at low settings. I just tested it again and it starts at 11 zoom buttons out, then at 22 and then it stays the same after that. So.. three levels? Maybe increase the second one to around 22 and the third to 30. The effect is also present in the fitting window, and I can see only 2 levels which seems to start at 4 mousewheels out. And it looks like the feature is missing in both the ship hangar view and the captains quarters mode. [i] Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: The usual module lag and overview lag is there, even as I was zoomed out and away from the fray. There was this thing I stumbled upon though, with a Survey Scanner for asteroids. When pressing CTRL on the keyboard, I can lock objects from the overview, fleet broadcast history and the Survey scanner results. While pressing X on the keyboard, I can broadcast targets from the overview, the fleet broadcast history, but not on the survey scanner results? I tested this a couple of times, and it seems the X broadcast key is broken for the survey scanner results window.
Dumnomii The Fated E.Y 0	Posted - 2013.11.04 19:47:00 - [108] - Quote OK rather than dual client this time , dual boxed it , now can any one explain to me why a 6 year old machine running 32Bit Vista OS, 4GB ram , 512MB video Ram out performs a 3 month old 64 bit 8GB ram , windows 8 machine with a 1GB graphis card? Cant dual client the windows 8 box at all its horrible :( Sat in station spinning Vista is making 60 FPS, Windows 8 is doing 20 FPS. Box 1 GÇó DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): Client set to 11, actually autosets to 9 GÇó OS version: Vitsa Ultimate SP2 GÇó CPU: Intel Core 2, Quad core 2.4GHz GÇó GPU: ATI radeon HD 3800, 512MB GÇó RAM: 4GB GÇó How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 GÇó Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High - Anti-Aliasing: - Shader Quality: - Texture Quality: - LOD Quality: User Experience GÇó Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 20 GÇó Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 14 GÇó Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5 GÇó Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? None GÇó We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? Slightly, but didnt seem signifcantly worse than normal GÇó Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Much smoother than last time, annoying gate jump anmination got frozen, jumping through to Poirot sat there for 5 minutes wandering if I had arrived in system as could see warp scram messages but still had gate animation, once I started taking damage I kind of guessed I must have arrived.. Box 2 GÇó DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): 11 GÇó OS version: Windows 8 GÇó CPU: Intel I5 - 3330, Quad Core , 3GHz GÇó GPU: Nvidia GeForce GT 620, 1GB GÇó RAM: 8 GB GÇó How many clients were you running at the same time? GÇó Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High - Anti-Aliasing: Disabled - Shader Quality: High - Texture Quality: High - LOD Quality: High User Experience GÇó Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 13 GÇó Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 4 GÇó Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 3 GÇó Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No GÇó We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? Slow frame rate discouraged to much zooming GÇó Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Okay but a bit laggy
baldizar Ratchet Industries Dark Aether 1	Posted - 2013.11.04 20:08:00 - [109] - Quote DirectX :9 OS version:windows xp pro 64 CPU:Intel-« CoreGäó2 Quad Processor Q9450 (12M Cache, 2.66 GHz, 1333 MHz FSB) GPU:NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 - 576.0 MHz RAM:8GB How many clients were you running at the same time?=1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high):high - Anti-Aliasing: Disabled - Shader Quality:high - Texture Quality:high - LOD Quality:high User Experience was better than previous large group encounters even though I had an issue with a crash on exiting station. Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: approx 55>60 fps Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: aprox 13>15fps Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? 9
Gaia Ma'chello V.I.C.E. 78	Posted - 2013.11.04 20:44:00 - [110] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): 9 OS version: OSX 10.7.5 CPU: 2.66 GHz Intel Core i7 GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M 512 MB RAM: 8 GB 1067 MHz DDR3 How many clients were you running at the same time? One Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Medium - Anti-Aliasing: Off - Shader Quality: Medium - Texture Quality: Medium - LOD Quality: Low User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 3.5 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 2.5 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 4 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? Yes, for example the POS force field never appeared for me. Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: The space scene took a long time to load whenever I entered a new area, either from a gate jump or just warping to another grid. The main example: I never saw the POS force field. The POS was destroyed before it loaded. Also it took a looonnnggg time for my ship to appear. Running the test: better fleet formation is needed. Use adverts or something.

Arctic Kalkoken Southern Cross Empire Flying Dangerous 0	Posted - 2013.11.04 22:09:00 - [111] - Quote DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): 9 OS version: OS X Version 10.9 CPU: 3.4 GFHz Intel Core i7 GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX 2048 MB RAM: 32GB 1600 MHz DDR3 How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High - Anti-Aliasing: Disabled - Shader Quality: High - Texture Quality: High - LOD Quality: High User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: unk Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: unk Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 2 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? YES We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? Yes, for example the POS force field never appeared for me. Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: My client crashed while I was attacking the the tower, I attempted to log back in, however my launcher froze as well. 5 hours later I was able to get my launcher to launch the game. The game was a bit laggy (large fleet), Slow frame rates while we were at the X-B gate (during warp) reduced playability.
onatural Aegri somnia vana 0	Posted - 2013.11.04 23:28:00 - [112] - Quote DirectX version your client was running: DX11 OS version: Windows 8 Pro CPU: Intel Core i5 2500k (oc @4.3ghz) GPU: radeon 7950 RAM: 16GB DDR3 How many clients were you running at the same time? 2 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high) - Anti-Aliasing: High - Shader Quality: High - Texture Quality: High - LOD Quality: High User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 55 -zoomed in: 25 Had no DC, did feel slight lag (to be expected!) Overall a good smooth experience
Thycoon Patrician Space Incorporation Patrician Space Incorporation Holding Alliance 3	Posted - 2013.11.05 09:49:00 - [113] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX version your client6 was running: DX11 OS version: Windows 7 Professional 64-bit CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3820 CPU @ 3.60GHz (8 CPUs) 3.8GHz (Turbo boost) GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690, Display Memory: 4014 MB RAM: 65.536 GB RAM DDR3 (OC to 1600 MHz) How many clients were you running at the same time? 7 (frigs) Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Optimized Settings for Performance All clients running in "Fixed Window", Window Size: 1920x1080, Present Interval: Interval one Effects: Camera Shake set Miscellaneous: none set Anti-Aliasing: Disabled Shader Quality: Low Texture Quality: Medium LOD Quality: Low User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Pitot, zoomed out: between 15 and 21 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Pitot, zoomed in: between 15 and 21 Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): 15 and 21 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) Not participated in big fleet fights on TQ but a "5"! Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? None We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? Not noticed because of overall lagging! Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: No major problems with all 7 clients! After the first jump again some ships from my clients are about 1 Mill. km from the Gate/cyno-suppliers away but no crashes. FPS changed plus minus 5 while changing brackets. Overall the performance was ok - but if there are more capitals and bubbles than it will be difficult! There is still a lot of space for performance improvement from server side!

CCP Zorba C C P C C P Alliance 71	Posted - 2013.11.05 11:29:00 - [114] - Quote Musashi Date wrote: Machine Info and Settings DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): Running on DX9; the launcher settings says "! Your computer only supports DirectX 9" and the selection box has been greyed with DirectX9 in it. This was.. peculiar because my dxdiag clearly says I have DirectX 11 on. OS version:Win7 64bit CPU:Core2Duo [email protected] GPU:Radeon 4670 2Gb RAM:4Gb DDR2 I'm not sure what Windows is reporting but that card does not support DX11, only DX10 and 10.1.

Space Knight Dadunur Nuke Online 0	Posted - 2013.11.05 13:28:00 - [115] - Quote DirectX version your client was running :Dx11 OS version: Windows 7 x64 BIT CPU: Intel Celeron G555 2.70GHz GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 RAM: G.Skill RipJawsZ 8 GB DDR3-160 How many clients were you running at the same time? 3 Clients Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): medium - Anti-Aliasing: medium - Shader Quality: medium - Texture Quality: medium - LOD Quality: medium User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 10 - 20 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 10-15 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? 5 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? Yeah


Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.