All Channels  Test Server Feedback      Mass test feedback, November 4th » Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google  Monitor this thread via RSS [?]   Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] Author Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) CCP Habakuk C C P C C P Alliance 793 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:35:00 - [1] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): OS version: CPU: GPU: RAM: How many clients were you running at the same time? Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): - Anti-Aliasing: - Shader Quality: - Texture Quality: - LOD Quality: User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Jack Terok Unknown Reality Investigation Unknown Reality 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:46:00 - [2] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): dx11 OS version: win7 CPU: i5 - 3570 k GPU: gtx 670 gainward phantom RAM: 16 gb How many clients were you running at the same time? 2 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot: 10 fps Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No Wide Smiles Osmosis Inc Li3 Federation 1 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:46:00 - [3] - Quote gtx 680 i5 3570k 8gb maxed settings, everything absolutely max, recording with fraps at half quality at 15fps in battle. Without fraps around 30-50fps. Performance was very very nice. Weddis Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:47:00 - [4] - Quote DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): dx11 OS version: Windows 7 CPU: IK I5 GPU: gtx 460 RAM: 8gb How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot: 12 fps Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No ComDoggy Piwat CO 2 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:48:00 - [5] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): dx9 OS version: Win 8 CPU: i5 - 3570 k GPU: gtx 670 gainward phantom RAM: 6 gb How many clients were you running at the same time? 2 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): - Anti-Aliasing: low - Shader Quality: low - Texture Quality: low - LOD Quality: low User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 5-6 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 3-4 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) : 1 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? : no We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? no darke sabbath Trident UA Red Alliance 1 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:49:00 - [6] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): dx11 OS version: Win7 CPU: i5 2500k oc'ed to 4.4GHz GPU: 2x GF GTX560 Ti RAM: 16gb How many clients were you running at the same time? 3 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high - Anti-Aliasing: 8x - Shader Quality: high - Texture Quality: high - LOD Quality: high User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 25 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 5 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 4 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? no Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: was fun Tronnic Rhodan New Eden Union V.e.G.A. 158 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:50:00 - [7] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): dx9 OS version: Win 7 Professional CPU: i7 2600k OCed @ 4,5GHz GPU: GTX 680 Phantom 2x SLI RAM: 8GB Ram How many clients were you running at the same time? 4 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Mainclient=MAX / seconday clients=Medium - Anti-Aliasing: max on main, medium on secondarys - Shader Quality: max, medium secondarys - Texture Quality: max, medium on secondarys - LOD Quality: max, medium on secondarys User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 50 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 35-40 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome): 9 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes?: No, all was fine We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? Background went white on all clients for about 5 seconds, no lag Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Had some time dilation while jumping, but then all was fine at the tower. Gatecamp was a little bit laggy but still fine, better then on TQ. Overall: very nice! Keep on the good work! HEPEAJIbHOCTb Raging Ducks Goonswarm Federation 16 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:50:00 - [8] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): dx9 OS version: Win 8 CPU: i5 - 3570 k GPU: gtx 670 gainward phantom RAM: 6 gb How many clients were you running at the same time? 2 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): - Anti-Aliasing: low - Shader Quality: low - Texture Quality: low - LOD Quality: low User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 5-6 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 3-4 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) : 1 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? : no We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? no Lussy Lou Fremen Sietch DarkSide. 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:50:00 - [9] - Quote DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): dx11 OS version: Windows 7 CPU: IK I5 GPU: gtx 455 RAM: 8gb How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot: 10 fps Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No Nicen Jehr Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective 264 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:50:00 - [10] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): DX9 OS version: win7 x64 CPU: 3 core athlon phenom II @ 2.81 GHz GPU: nvidia 9800 gtx+ RAM: 12gb How many clients were you running at the same time? one sisi, one tranquility Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high (see all settings: http://i.imgur.com/5yAZzXK.png) - Anti-Aliasing: off - Shader Quality: high - Texture Quality: high - LOD Quality: high User Experience i had brackets turned on Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 5-10 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 1-5 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5, ive never got e-warped coming through a gate on TQ tho Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? no i rarely zoom in close especially in heavy scenes. if it helps performace, great, keep it! Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: -make it clear whether we actually need to type 'x' in fleetw -make it clear to ALIGN, DON'T WARP, to the POS Warpin -write a devblog that tells us players what data you collect during a masstest, and how you analyze it, with graphs and **** Quiby San 6 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:51:00 - [11] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX version your client was running: DirectX11 OS version: Windows 7 64bit CPU: Intel i7-2600k @ 4.5GHz GPU: 2x nVidia GeForce GTX680 2-way SLI RAM: 16GB DRR3 @ 1600MHz How many clients were you running at the same time?: 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High - Anti-Aliasing: High - Shader Quality: High - Texture Quality: High - LOD Quality: High User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: ~30 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: ~20-25 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome): 4 Worse than the previous Masstest Did you experience any disconnects or crashes?: None We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience?: Yes, the ships/tower and effects looked blurry/hard-egded. Sorry, but I do enjoy EvE for its graphics as well and zoom around a lot. Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Similar program like the previous test, just quite worse in terms of framerate. Capital jumping was better this time, barely long waiting times. Effects and explosions looked a bit weird/cheap this time. TiDi kicked in (Did not happen last time) Thank you very much! Stennos Ellecon Synister Industries SpaceMonkey's Alliance 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:51:00 - [12] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): 9 OS version: Windows 7 SP1 CPU: Intel Core2Duo E8400 @ 3GHz GPU: ATI Radeon HD 4800 RAM: 4GB How many clients were you running at the same time? -> 1 Client Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): - Anti-Aliasing: Disabled - Shader Quality: Medium - Texture Quality: High - LOD Quality: Medium User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: ? (didnt know i had to record that!) Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: ? (didnt know i had to record that!) Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? -> never been in such a big fleet. it was quite bad though Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? -> no. We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? -> I do not know. Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Very slow. A bit chaotic as I was unable to join any fleets although I was there in time. It wasnt fun but I am happy to have helped a bit. Wasnt too long either. Next time please tell us what data to collect (eg FPS) so we can help you better. qofe Blacksteel Mining and Manufacturing Renaissance Federation 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:51:00 - [13] - Quote DirectX 11 OS version: Windows 8.1 CPU:Intel core i7-3820 @3.60ghz GPU: GeForce GTX 670 RAM:16 G 2 clients Graphic setting high - Anti-Aliasing: off - Shader Quality:high - Texture Quality: high - LOD Quality:high Nothing unusual to report visually, except stuck in warp tunnel for over a minute. Leon Anneto The Malleus Maleficarum Brothers of Tangra 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:51:00 - [14] - Quote DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): dx11 OS version: win7 CPU: AMD phenom ii GPU: gtx 660 RAM: 8 gb How many clients were you running at the same time? 2 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot: 26 fps zoomed out . 10 zoomed in Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No Syman Saissore The Scope Gallente Federation 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:52:00 - [15] - Quote DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): OS version: Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit CPU: Phenom II x4 960t BE (unlocked 6 core at 3.0GHz GPU: Radeon HD 7870 Sapphire OC Ed. RAM: G.skill Sniper (2x4GB) How many clients were you running at the same time? 2 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high - Anti-Aliasing: high - Shader Quality: high - Texture Quality: high - LOD Quality: high User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 40~60 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 20~30 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 4 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? No Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Had fun c; Noriko Mai 1028 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:52:00 - [16] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): 11 OS version: Win 7 CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo E6750@ 2.66GHz GPU: AMD Radeon HD 6800 RAM: 6GB How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high - Anti-Aliasing: medium - Shader Quality: high - Texture Quality: high - LOD Quality: high User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 7 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 5 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? no Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Omaristos Shazihu Viziam Amarr Empire 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:52:00 - [17] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX version: 11 OS version: Windows 7 SP1 CPU: i7-2600K GPU: NVidia GeForce GTX 560 Ti, driver version 331.58 RAM: 16 GB How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high - Anti-Aliasing: high - Shader Quality: high - Texture Quality: high - LOD Quality: high User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 20 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 12 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size?: 7 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? No Vladimir Aurekta Caldari Provisions Caldari State 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:52:00 - [18] - Quote Dx 11 OS: Win 7 CPU: Core 2 Quad 2.4GHz GPU: HD 6870 RAM: 8GB DDR2 2 Clients High Settings AA: High Shader: High Texture: High LOD: High Experience Poitot Out: 15 fps Poitot In : 5 fps Performance: Same No crashes/disconnect FPS decrease made noticing LOD difficult Was fun, couldn't actually join a fleet but shot at anything that shot back. Liking the new SoE ships Lucretia Magnus Aliastra Gallente Federation 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:52:00 - [19] - Quote DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information):dx11 OS version:win7 CPU:intel quad i5 3550 GPU:nvidia 660Ti RAM:8gb How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): hight - Anti-Aliasing: high - Shader Quality: high - Texture Quality:high - LOD Quality:high User Experience , It felt like last test went better , there was lower FPs and i had lag when i tried to target anything at the poitot fight Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 20 fps Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 14 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? NO We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? not really, Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: helioswipe moondraft EVE University Ivy League 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:53:00 - [20] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): DirectX 11 OS version: windows 7 CPU: Intel core i7 3770 GPU:Nvidia GeForce gtx 560 Ti RAM: 8GB How many clients were you running at the same time? 2 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high):low - Anti-Aliasing: disabled - Shader Quality: low - Texture Quality: medium - LOD Quality: low User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 40 fps Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no McBorsk Multispace Technologies Inc Yulai Federation 21 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:53:00 - [21] - Quote CCP Habakuk wrote: Machine Info and Settings DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): OS version: Win 7 CPU: i5 3450 @ 3.1 ghz GPU: GTX 670 RAM: 8gb How many clients were you running at the same time? One Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High - Anti-Aliasing: Low - Shader Quality: High - Texture Quality: High - LOD Quality: High User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 25 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 20 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 9 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? None We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? Nope. Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Good fun. Have nothing to complain about. WhoBeI Duty. The Cursed Few 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:53:00 - [22] - Quote DirectX: dx11 OS version: win7 CPU: i5 (4 cores) 2500 GPU: GT610 RAM: 8Gb How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high - Anti-Aliasing: none. - Shader Quality: high - Texture Quality: high - LOD Quality: high no crashes, was responsive. FPS low but I have a crappy gfx so... Aehrel Veelar Caille Insurance 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:53:00 - [23] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information):dx11 OS version:win8 CPU:intel i7-3770 GPU:GeForce GTX 680 RAM:12 How many clients were you running at the same time?2 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high):high - Anti-Aliasing: disabled - Shader Quality:high - Texture Quality:high - LOD Quality:high User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out:20 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in:12 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome)3 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes?no We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience?no Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Farid Kefash Synister Industries SpaceMonkey's Alliance 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:54:00 - [24] - Quote DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): OS version: win7 64 CPU: AMD athlon II x4 640 3GHZ GPU: Radeon HD 6900 RAM: 8GB How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): - Anti-Aliasing: Disabled - Shader Quality: High - Texture Quality: High - LOD Quality: High Framerate during the fight: not so great. No crashes Some ships didnt load, mine was 6 guns floating through space for a while. Ar Tallion Maledicttion 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:54:00 - [25] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): dx11 OS version: Win 8 CPU: 2 GPU: 1 RAM: 3 How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): - Anti-Aliasing: low - Shader Quality: low - Texture Quality: low - LOD Quality: low User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 2-4 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 2-4 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) : 1 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? : no We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? no Tynakuh Garoun Investment Bank Gallente Federation 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:54:00 - [26] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): dx11 OS version: Win 7 Prof. CPU: Intel i-5 3570k GPU: Nvidia 670GTX RAM: 8GIG DDR3 1855mhz How many clients were you running at the same time? One Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high - Anti-Aliasing: Disabled - Shader Quality: high - Texture Quality: high - LOD Quality: high User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 20 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in:8 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? Yes Kurinkita Audeles Impromptu Asset Requisition Insurance Fraud. 1 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:54:00 - [27] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX version : DX9 OS version: Windows 7 CPU: Intel i7-4770k GPU: Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 4GB RAM: 16GB How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Client Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): - Anti-Aliasing: High - Shader Quality: High - Texture Quality: High - LOD Quality: High User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 30 fps Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 15 fps Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) Never been in a fight this big on this hardware Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? I did not notice it Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Worked just fine, my client never got unresponsive and I could pilot my ship fine Ezoah Al'ktar Exploration Frontier inc 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:54:00 - [28] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): OS version: CPU: GPU: RAM: How many clients were you running at the same time? Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): - Anti-Aliasing: low - Shader Quality:low - Texture Quality:low - LOD Quality:low User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 10-15 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 5-6 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? no Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: no bug, no crash. Good test George Fox Blacksteel Mining and Manufacturing Renaissance Federation 7 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:54:00 - [29] - Quote DirectX 11 OS version: Windows 8.1 CPU:Intel core i7-3820 @3.60ghz GPU: GeForce GTX 670 RAM:16 G 2 clients Graphic setting high - Anti-Aliasing: off - Shader Quality:high - Texture Quality: high - LOD Quality:high Could not join fleet Nokin Niam Dog Brothers Unchained. 8 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:54:00 - [30] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information):dx11 OS version: Win 8.0 CPU: AMD Phenom x6 GPU: ATI 7870 RAM: 4gb How many clients were you running at the same time? 3 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): low - Anti-Aliasing: disabled - Shader Quality: low - Texture Quality: Low - LOD Quality: medium User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 20fps approx Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 15fps approx Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome): 6 better than other battles i've fought... Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? It seemed laggy to me as the textures of the ships didn't appear immediatly Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: It seemed that someones shooting me several times and no timer or log entry appeared..... Capitan Freeman Masters of EG Corp Hand of Despair 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:54:00 - [31] - Quote Machine Info and Settings: DirectX - 10 OS - Win7 CPU - AMD PhenomX6 GPU - ATI Radeon HD5700 RAM - 4Gb Clients - 2 Graphic setting - low - Anti-Aliasing : low - Shader Quality: med - Texture Quality: med - LOD Quality: med User Experience: Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 25 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 10 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) : 5 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? - NO We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? - YES Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: - Ali Aras Valkyries of Night Of Sound Mind 416 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:55:00 - [32] - Quote DX9 Windows 7 Intel Core i3, 3.2 GHz. Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 4 GB I was running 1 client, with graphics on...medium? http://imgur.com/2TYofL3 I didn't zoom in during the fight, but was getting few FPS-- I think about 8, when I hit ctrl-f. I was doing different things than I usually am on TQ, so this is hard to evaluate. My last big TQ fight I was in a bomber. It didn't feel OMG THIS IS AWESOME though. I did not disconnect or crash. The texture LOD stuff I noticed when we were on the POS. It did degrade the visual experience, but I figure that's just the price of being in a high-lag environment. Controls in Poitot felt very sluggish and laggy. There were several points where it felt like the client wasn't reacting well to the commands I was giving, but I couldn't tell if this was normal, because no good comparison to TQ. Notably, brackets on or off did not change my experience or the performance at all; I was getting 9-11 fps on the pos either way. Arc Tander Lom Corporation Why So Super Seri0Us 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:55:00 - [33] - Quote DX11 CPU: AMD FX-4350 GPU: Nvidia GeForce GTX650Ti RAM: 8Gb How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): All high - Anti-Aliasing: Medium - Shader Quality: High - Texture Quality: High - LOD Quality: High User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 15 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 10 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? No view Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Tibo Paralian Dirt 'n' Glitter I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth 8 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:55:00 - [34] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX 11 OS version: Windows 8 64-bit, no Service Pack CPU: AMD Athlon II X4 640 GPU: AMD Radeon HD 7700 RAM: 8GB How many clients were you running at the same time?: 1 Client Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): - Anti-Aliasing: Disabled - Shader Quality: Medium - Texture Quality: Medium - LOD Quality: Medium User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 10 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 5 (had brackets on) Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? Negative StarFX Walrus Protection Agency 4 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:56:00 - [35] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): Dx9 OS version: Windows 7 home premium 64-bit (6.1, build 7601) CPU: intel i7 2600 GPU: Nvidia geforce GT 545 RAM: 16gb How many clients were you running at the same time? Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): - Anti-Aliasing: low - Shader Quality: low - Texture Quality: high - LOD Quality: high User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 25-30 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 5-10 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) N/a Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? nope We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? nope Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Brackets on or off only really made much difference zoomed in which was 1 fps either way ran smooth apart from the obvious TiDi Elfi Wolfe University of Caille Gallente Federation 12 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:56:00 - [36] - Quote DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): dx9 OS version: Win7x64 CPU: i7 U640 @1.2 Ghz GPU: dual video Intel HD or Nvidia GeForce GT 335M (I think it was running the Intel video) RAM: 8GB How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high - Anti-Aliasing: disabbled - Shader Quality: high - Texture Quality: high - LOD Quality:high User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 15 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 8 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 6 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? no Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: epicurus ataraxia Broken Wheel Mercantile and Trading Company Illusion of Solitude 89 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:56:00 - [37] - Quote #5Posted: 2013.11.04 17:48 | Report | Edited by: ComDoggy Like Machine Info and Settings DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): dx9 OS version: Win 7 CPU: i3 GPU: gforce 7900GT RAM: 4 gb How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): - Anti-Aliasing: low - Shader Quality: low - Texture Quality: low - LOD Quality: low User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 5-6 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 3-4 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) : 2 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? : no We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? no DoMiHaToP Desert Pirates Cartel 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:56:00 - [38] - Quote DX11 OS ver Win 7 CPU i5 - 2500K GPU HD5770 Ram 16gb 2 clients Graphic is MAX FPS 2-5 in zoom and out 11-14 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? : No We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? no not... Pash teh Joint Harvesting Amarr Empire 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:56:00 - [39] - Quote Win 8.1 DX 11.1 64 bit cpu Intel Z87 AMD 7970 16gb ram 1 client Graphics set to max Quality No disconnects or crashes Zannnder Arkhon Industries Solarmark Coalition 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:56:00 - [40] - Quote DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): dx11 OS version: Windows 7 CPU: FX8350 @ 5Gh GPU: HIS Radeon 5830 RAM: 8gb How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 10 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 40 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? 4 4 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No Masao Kurata Z List 36 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:56:00 - [41] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): dx9 OS version: Windows 7 SP1 CPU: i5-3570 GPU: Radeon HD 4770 RAM: 8 GB How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high - Anti-Aliasing: medium - Shader Quality: medium - Texture Quality: high - LOD Quality: high User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 14 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 13 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? I did notice some very blurry textures, I guess this is why. Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: There was a curious one way emergency warp on exiting the warp tunnel for the first jump, leaving me a million km from the gate. Alvatore DiMarco Capricious Endeavours Ltd CAStabouts 936 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:56:00 - [42] - Quote ]Machine Info and Settings DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): DX11 OS version: Win7 Ultimate, x64 CPU: Athlon II X4, 3.2GHz GPU: NVIDIA GTX 570 RAM: 6GB How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High - Anti-Aliasing: High - Shader Quality: High - Texture Quality: High - LOD Quality: High User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 15-25 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 7-12 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? Yes. Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: The texture LODing was delayed enough that things (including my ship) didn't actually appear for 10 seconds or so when zooming in/out at the POS fight. I moved my camera to someone else's ship during the fight and it was 30 seconds before I saw anything other than their guns. Imperator Erquilenne Section 496 1 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:56:00 - [43] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX version your client was running: dx11 OS version: Windows 7 CPU: i7-3630QM GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX675MX 4Gb GDDR5 RAM: 8 GB How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High - Anti-Aliasing: Disabled - Shader Quality: High - Texture Quality: High - LOD Quality: High User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 15 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 5-10 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? Have not been in this large a fleet on TQ Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? No Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Too much lag to really do much Chastise Smart Ice Bears Academy Enemy . Unknown 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:57:00 - [44] - Quote DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): dx9 OS version: win7 CPU: AMD Phenom(tm) II x4 965 processor 3.40 GHz GPU: ATI Radeon HD 4800 RAM: 8 GB How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 client Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): - Anti-Aliasing: disabled - Shader Quality: high - Texture Quality: high - LOD Quality: high User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 30 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 5 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? I do not know. Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: what was good Onamata Poeia University of Caille Gallente Federation 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:57:00 - [45] - Quote DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): dx11 OS version: win7 CPU: phenom 2 x4 955 GPU: amd radeon hd6850 RAM: 8G How many clients were you running at the same time? Just 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Low - Anti-Aliasing: Disabled - Shader Quality: None - Texture Quality: Medium - LOD Quality: High User Experience Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 7 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? Not noticably Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: New bubbles are epic Arki Shikkoken Space Pioneers F.E.R.A.L 1 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:57:00 - [46] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX version : dx9 OS version: Windows 7 32-Bit CPU: AMD Athlon X2 Dual-Core QL-65 GPU: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4500/5100 Series RAM: 3 GB How many clients were you running at the same time? : 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): low - Anti-Aliasing: Disabled - Shader Quality: Low - Texture Quality: Low - LOD Quality: Low User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 10 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 2 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) : 5 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? : No We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? No Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Experience was ok for me for that fleet size, i'm happy that my GPU didn't overheated. etherial nova Strategic Industries INC. Unknown Destination 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:57:00 - [47] - Quote DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): DX9 OS version: Microsoft Windows 7 Professional 64-bit CPU: i5-4670 GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 RAM: 8Gb How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High - Anti-Aliasing: Disabled - Shader Quality: High - Texture Quality: High - LOD Quality: High User Experience Average FPS during the fight: Was not paying attention to the FPS. TiDi was more of an impact than frame issues. Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome): 5 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? I noticed it when zooming in on my ship. In a way it does, but I am not one to complain about it. Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: There were 2 bugs that I will be submitting reports for. The first was after first the mass gate jump. When I landed, my ship auto-warped to some deadspace location. The second was during the warp to dock up, I had the MFD animation on the rear of my ship midwarp. Baygun EVE University Ivy League 2 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:57:00 - [48] - Quote DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): OS version: windows 7 (latest SP) CPU: i7 2nd generation GPU: nvidia GTX560 Ti RAM: 8GB How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 client Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high - Anti-Aliasing: Medium - Shader Quality: high - Texture Quality: high - LOD Quality: high User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 50 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 23 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) : N/A Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? NO Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: TiDi'ed jumping between systems is awsome :) Humanitas Imperium Technologies Get Off My Lawn 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:58:00 - [49] - Quote DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): Direct X 11 OS version: Windows 7 CPU: i7 3770 GPU: AMD RADEON HD 7770 RAM: 16 GB How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High - Anti-Aliasing: High - Shader Quality: High - Texture Quality: High - LOD Quality: High User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 30 FPS Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 23 FPS Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 7 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? No Ran smoother this time than last mass test. Also noticed that TiDi was only at 40% roughly and not 10% like last time. Was also fleetless this time with a fuller overview and had brackets on and still got the same and maybe a little higher fps at the gate with everything set to high still. Brakh Openhimer EMI Inc. 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:58:00 - [50] - Quote DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): Dx11 OS version: Win7 CPU: Q6600 GPU: GTX550ti RAM:4GB How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High - Anti-Aliasing: Disabled: High - Shader Quality: High - Texture Quality: High - LOD Quality: High Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 30 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 20 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? Once or twice for few sec Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Stable visual, no crash, minimal lag(~5sec), no other issues Utopa Kashuken Rotten Kimchi Squadron Brothers of Tangra 11 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:58:00 - [51] - Quote DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): dx9 OS version: win 7 CPU: Intel Celeron B800 GPU: Intel(R) HD Graphics RAM: 6GM How many clients were you running at the same time? : 2 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): - Anti-Aliasing: Off - Shader Quality: Low - Texture Quality: Low - LOD Quality: Low User Experience Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) : 5 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? : No We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? : No FComa FComa Corporation 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:59:00 - [52] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX 9 (11) OS version: win 8 pro CPU:i7 GPU:nvidia geforce 640m RAM:8G How many clients were you running at the same time?2 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high):high - Anti-Aliasing: - Shader Quality: - Texture Quality: - LOD Quality: User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome)8 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes?no We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:liked the new warp implant set (ascending) , dunno if it worked though :) Kae Arjar Lawless Carnage 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:59:00 - [53] - Quote DirectX version : 9 OS version: Win 8.1 CPU: i5 GPU: GeForce GT 420M RAM: 8GB How many clients were you running at the same time: 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Lowest User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 15 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 2 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes: Nope We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience: No, was zoomed out too far for the majority Bogelcat Void Protocol 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:59:00 - [54] - Quote irectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): OS version:windows7 CPU:2.8ghz i7 GPU: RAM:8gb How many clients were you running at the same time? 3 Graphic setting of the client: high - Anti-Aliasing: disabled - Shader Quality:high - Texture Quality:high - LOD Quality:high User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: not sure but very low Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in:not sure but very low Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome): have not been in fleet that size before Did you experience any disconnects or crashes?no We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience?no Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Hybrid Carlin Exiles of Chaos WO'S HO'S 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 17:59:00 - [55] - Quote CCP Habakuk wrote: Machine Info and Settings DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): OS version: CPU: GPU: RAM: How many clients were you running at the same time? Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): - Anti-Aliasing: - Shader Quality: - Texture Quality: - LOD Quality: User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: frankFTW91 I N E X T R E M I S Gentlemen's Agreement 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 18:00:00 - [56] - Quote DX11 Windows 7 x64 Intel i7 920 Nvidia GTX 560ti 6GB 2 Clients High Graphics Settings AA Disabled AVG FPS zoomed out: 40 fps AVG FPS zoomed in: 10 fps Client Performance: 6 I did not notice any visual degradation as a result of the delayed texture loading. The fight was impressive visually. The initial invites did not go as well as the last mass test. The performance of the client was improved was the last mass test, I had less module activation lag and the client remained responsive. At the end of the fight when after we were instructed to leave the field, I warped straight through a bubble that was on grid with the gate on the way to the station. I'm not sure if I was actively in a bubble when I initiated warp but I thought that bubbles in your path would stop warp. I was in a non nullified tengu. m4n5 Desert Pirates Cartel 1 Posted - 2013.11.04 18:00:00 - [57] - Quote DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): dx11 OS version: Win7 x 64 CPU: i5 2400 GPU: HD 5770 RAM: 16GB How many clients were you running at the same time? 2 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high - Anti-Aliasing: disabbled - Shader Quality: high - Texture Quality: high - LOD Quality:high User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 10-13 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 3-8 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 4 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? no Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: very nice guys... real nice graphics!!! McGringo Multispace Technologies Inc Yulai Federation 1 Posted - 2013.11.04 18:00:00 - [58] - Quote CCP Habakuk wrote: Machine Info and Settings DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): DX 11 OS version: Win 8.1 CPU: Intel Core i7 2.4 GHz GPU: GTX 780m RAM: 16 gb How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high across the board - Anti-Aliasing: Disabled - Shader Quality: High - Texture Quality: High - LOD Quality: High User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 19+ Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 12+ Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 7 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? No Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Quite good flow, slightly laggy but still good based on the amount of players in fleets fighting. Claire Strife School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 18:00:00 - [59] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX version my client was running: 11 OS version: Windows 7 64-bit CPU: AMD Phenom (tm) II x4 955 Processor 3.20 GHz GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 1GB RAM: 8gb How many clients were you running at the same time? Only 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): medium - Anti-Aliasing: Disabled - Shader Quality: High - Texture Quality: High - LOD Quality: High User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 20-30 fps Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 1-10 fps Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 8 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? Yes Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: I am very proud that I took part in test. That was rally fun. Keep it up! mantka fist Proletariat Projects Inc SoulWing Alliance 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 18:00:00 - [60] - Quote Dx11 GPU- Nvidia gt 630m 8 gigs 1 client anti-al disabled shader high texture high lod Quality high exp was fun zoomed out fps 15 zoomed in 5 5 no DC NO it was a good test Fornicis Rules of Acquisition Acquisition Of Empire 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 18:01:00 - [61] - Quote DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information):dx11 OS version:win7 64 CPU:Intel Xeon 2x Dual 5150 2.66GHz GPU:ATi Radeon HD4870 RAM:7GB How many clients were you running at the same time?2 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high):high - Anti-Aliasing: disabled - Shader Quality:high - Texture Quality:high - LOD Quality:high User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out:21 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in:9 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome)2 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes?No We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience?No Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: POS thumbnail missing when locked, otherwise as expected Senva Talva Science and Trade Institute Caldari State 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 18:01:00 - [62] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX 9 All settings as low as possible, no brackets. Was client performance...? 5=same Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No. We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory...: Yes I noticed this before seeing this explanation. It was somewhat distracting. The very lowest texture quality pops in too early for capital ships. Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: No problems except for no fleet invite. Capt Blackjack Bloodthirsty Capitalists of Eve 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 18:01:00 - [63] - Quote DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): DX9 OS version: Windows 7 CPU:Intel Core i7 Q 720 GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M RAM: 6.00 GB How many clients were you running at the same time? 3 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High - Anti-Aliasing: Disabled - Shader Quality: High - Texture Quality: High - LOD Quality: High User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 12.40 FFP Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 11.4 FFP Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 7 Noticable better Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? Didn't notice the difference. Hugo Mesmopotian Full Contact Blinky Red Brotherhood 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 18:02:00 - [64] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): DX 11 OS version: Windows 7 CPU: Intel Core i3 M330 GPU: Nvidia GT 330M RAM: 4 GB How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Medium - Anti-Aliasing: Low - Shader Quality: Medium - Texture Quality: Medium - LOD Quality: Medium User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 15 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 5 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? yes Batoks State Protectorate Caldari State 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 18:02:00 - [65] - Quote Machine Info and Settings irectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): dx11 OS version: Windows 7 x64 CPU: i7 4770 GPU: GeForce GTX 560 RAM: 16Gb How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Optimize settings for Perfomance - Anti-Aliasing: Medium - Shader Quality: High - Texture Quality: High - LOD Quality: High User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: Comfort Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: Comfort Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No Europa Austrene Eos Tribe 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 18:02:00 - [66] - Quote DirectX version your client was running : Dx9 OS version: Win 7 CPU: Intel Celeron B800 GPU: Intel(R) HD Graphics RAM: 6GM How many clients were you running at the same time? : 2 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Low - Anti-Aliasing: off - Shader Quality: Low - Texture Quality: Low - LOD Quality: Low User Experience Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) : 5 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? : No We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? : No walker plank United Star Alliance UNITED STAR FEDERATION 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 18:02:00 - [67] - Quote Machine Info and Settings GÇó DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): dx11 GÇó OS version: Win7 GÇó CPU: i7 GÇó GPU: gtx5xx 2x GÇó RAM: 16G GÇó How many clients were you running at the same time? 2 GÇó Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high - Anti-Aliasing: High - Shader Quality:High - Texture Quality:High - LOD Quality:High User Experience GÇó Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (5=same) GÇó Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? 1 client DC GÇó We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience?no Valerii Ostudnev Leprosorium OLD MAN GANG 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 18:03:00 - [68] - Quote DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): dx9 OS version: OS X 10.9 CPU: Intel C2D 2.6 GHz GPU: NVIDIA GeForce 8800GTM RAM: 4 Gb How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): low - Anti-Aliasing: Disabled - Shader Quality: Low - Texture Quality: Medium - LOD Quality: Low User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 40 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 15 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 7 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? No Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Ador HUN Logrotate Inc. 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 18:03:00 - [69] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): DX9 OS version: W7 Ultimate X64 CPU: Intel GM45 GPU: Intel T3500 RAM: 2GB How many clients were you running at the same time? One Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): - Anti-Aliasing: OFF - Shader Quality: LOW - Texture Quality: MED - LOD Quality: LOW User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 10 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 2,70 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? NONE We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? No, it added more performance for me. Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Thank you guys for hosting the mass test! I had no issues, the game was performing usual. Mass test FPS stats: http://pastebin.com/rhZ0j84z Mass test LOG: http://pastebin.com/jHLJpBzZ V-67-BRAVO Erquilenne Federal Defense Union Gallente Federation 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 18:03:00 - [70] - Quote DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): DirectX 11 OS version: windows 8 pro CPU: I5-3570k CPU GPU: ASUS GeForce GTX 650 RAM: 8GB DDR3 1600MHz How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High ( for nice textures ) - Anti-Aliasing: Medium - Shader Quality: High - Texture Quality: High - LOD Quality: High User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 50 FPS Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 35 FPS Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? 10 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No Crashes ( Yay :D ) We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? Yes escribe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Best First mass test !!! very smoth game play with NO LAG!!!! Although jumping through X-BV98 was slow. And i was also stuck in the jump animation for a while. did anyone elce have this problem??? Nashyma Unknown Reality Investigation Unknown Reality 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 18:03:00 - [71] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): 9 OS version: Win 7 CPU: Intel Core i5 CPU M430 @2.27GHz GPU: NVidia Geforce GT 300M RAM: 8gb How many clients were you running at the same time? 2 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): HIGH - Anti-Aliasing: Disabled - Shader Quality: HIGH - Texture Quality: HIGH - LOD Quality: HIGH User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 15 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 1 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 1 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? Dont know. Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Horza Balvedaa MooCows 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 18:03:00 - [72] - Quote Feedback: DirectX: 11 OS version: Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1 CPU: Intel i7 930 GPU: AMD HD5850 RAM: 8GB 1 client Anti-Aliasing: High Shader Quality: High Texture Quality: High LOD Quality: High Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 13 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Stratios had 0m size in overview column. Darth Behelzebhu Lair of Demons 1 Posted - 2013.11.04 18:04:00 - [73] - Quote DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): dx9 OS version: Windows Vista64 CPU: Intel Core 2Quad GPU: Nvidia Geforce, 2 Gt120 2gb RAM: 8gb How many clients were you running at the same time?1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high):high - Anti-Aliasing: Disabled - Shader Quality: High - Texture Quality: Medium - LOD Quality: High Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 12 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 4-5 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? not much Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Carter Oskold Rules of Acquisition Acquisition Of Empire 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 18:04:00 - [74] - Quote DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information):DX11 OS version:win7 64 CPU:Intel Xeon 2x Dual 5150 2.66GHz GPU:ATi Radeon HD4870 RAM:7GB How many clients were you running at the same time?2 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high):high - Anti-Aliasing: disabled - Shader Quality:high - Texture Quality:high - LOD Quality:high User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out:21 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in:9 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome)2 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes?No We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience?No Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: POS thumbnail missing when locked, otherwise as expected, also aggro sounds out of sync. good test though :) Barkura Kane Eve Ryuken Ixtab. 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 18:04:00 - [75] - Quote DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): DX9 OS version: Win7 CPU: AMD X4 740 (3,7GHz) GPU: Nividia Geforce GTX 650 RAM: 4GB Clients : 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): - Anti-Aliasing: off - Shader Quality: High - Texture Quality: High - LOD Quality: High Poitot Out: 7 fps Poitot In : 4 fps No crashes No No Kosetzu S1lver Flame 84 Posted - 2013.11.04 18:05:00 - [76] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirextX: DirectX 9 (forgot to try 11...) OS: Windows 7 64-bit CPU: Intel i7-3770K 3.5 GHz (8 CPU) GPU: Nvidia Geforce GTX 680 RAM: 16GB How many clients were you running at the same time? One Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High, HDR Windowed Mode - Anti-Aliasing: Disabled - Shader Quality: High - Texture Quality: High - LOD Quality: High User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 25 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 15 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? No Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Had fun, rather good responsiveness on modules ( no forever-red-blinking). Khaylinn Akhunshar Republic University Minmatar Republic 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 18:05:00 - [77] - Quote Dx9 Win 7 64-bit AMD 9500 quad-core 2,2GHz NVIDIA gtx-280 4Gb RAM 1 client running Default "optimize for memory" graphic setting, with effects and brackets turned of. Average FPS at gate fight: 10-14fps No crashes The degradation of the textures where quite noticeable at times. Ariannesa Desert Pirates Cartel 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 18:05:00 - [78] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): DirectX 11 OS version: win7 X64 CPU: i5 2500k GPU: HD5770 RAM:16 gb How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): medium - Anti-Aliasing: off - Shader Quality: high - Texture Quality: high - LOD Quality: high User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 12-15 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 3-5 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 6 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no, no crashes and bugs. We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? hhmmm not =( Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: nice visualisation Spc One The Chodak Void Alliance 208 Posted - 2013.11.04 18:05:00 - [79] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): dx11 OS version: Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1, Datacenter Edition CPU: Core i7-3930K @ 4.722GHz (6 core CPU) GPU: Radeon HD 6970 2GB RAM: 16 GB DDR-3 1670MHz How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high - Anti-Aliasing: Low - Shader Quality: High - Texture Quality: High - LOD Quality: High User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 47 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 41 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? Yes, low quality textures. Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Client was running ok, add multi core cpu support ? :) Allake Pisakin The Versa-Ex Corp Mortuus. 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 18:06:00 - [80] - Quote OS version: windows 8 CPU: core i5 - 3210m 2.50 GHz GPU: Radeon RAM: 6GB How many clients were you running at the same time? - 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): med - Anti-Aliasing: law - Shader Quality: high - Texture Quality: med- LOD Quality: med User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 30 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 7 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) : N/A Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? - no We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? - NO Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: a lot of delaying ) Timcanpy Meza Sparks Inc Zero Hour Alliance 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 18:06:00 - [81] - Quote DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): dx9 OS version: win7 CPU: Core due T6600 GPU: Nvidia Gforce G105M RAM: 3GB How many clients were you running at the same time? 2 clients Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): - Anti-Aliasing: low - Shader Quality: low - Texture Quality: med - LOD Quality: low User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 15\20 FPS Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 10 FPS Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 7 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? Yes, when one of my ships died We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? No when of my chars was podded the client crashed and stay like that for 30 seg and at that time i was zoomed in, in the other client i zoomed out and it died the client didnt crash and everything worked like it should, everyhing was ok in zoom out ReaperCussion Bloodthirsty Capitalists of Eve 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 18:07:00 - [82] - Quote DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): DX9 OS version: Windows 7 CPU:Intel Core i7 Q 720 GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M RAM: 6.00 GB How many clients were you running at the same time? 3 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High - Anti-Aliasing: Disabled - Shader Quality: High - Texture Quality: High - LOD Quality: High User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 12.40 FFP Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 11.4 FFP Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 7 Noticable better Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? Didn't notice the difference. Hybrid Carlin Exiles of Chaos WO'S HO'S 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 18:07:00 - [83] - Quote DirectX: DX11 OS: Windows 7 Professional x64 CPU: Intel i7 950 GPU: Nvidia GTX 560ti RAM: 12GB EVE: 1 Clients Graphic setting of the client: High - Anti-Aliasing: High - Shader Quality: High - Texture Quality: High - LOD Quality: High AVG FPS zoomed out: 20 fps AVG FPS zoomed in: 7 fps Client Performance: 8.5 Did NOT experience any disconnects or crashes. Noticed the lowered texture quality in the large fights, didnt detract from my game experience. Client performance was much improved, never received a fleet invite. After the gate camp event ended I warped to the station to dock. I had a reverse graphic of the micro jump drive on my ship when initiating warp, and continuing through the tunnel. Rikki Bigg EVE University Ivy League 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 18:08:00 - [84] - Quote DirectX : dx11 OS version: windows 8.1 x64 CPU: amd FX-4100 at 4.5ghz GPU: amd Radeon HD 6770 DDR5-1GB RAM: 8GB Number of Clients: One Graphic setting: High - Anti-Aliasing: Disabled - Shader Quality: High - Texture Quality: High - LOD Quality: High Average FPS zoomed out: 30 Average FPS zoomed in: 10 Was client performance better or worse? 6-7 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? No Beliel Deathwing Red Dwarf Mining Corporation space weaponry and trade 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 18:08:00 - [85] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): DX11 OS version: Windows 7 Ultimate CPU: i7-2600k GPU: XFX HD 6950 RAM: 16 Gb How many clients were you running at the same time? 2 on test and 3 on Tranq Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high - Anti-Aliasing: Diabled - Shader Quality: High - Texture Quality: High - LOD Quality: High User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 40 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 17 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 10- never done anything that big Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? no Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Ganja Lotus Ratchet Industries Dark Aether 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 18:10:00 - [86] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): DX9 OS version: Win 7 Ultimate 64-bit CPU: QuadCore Intel Core 2 Quad Extreme QX9650, 3204 MHz Overclocked GPU: XFX AMD Radeon HD 7700 Series DD Edition, 2Gb Ram RAM: 8192 MB (DDR3-1066 DDR3 SDRAM) How many clients were you running at the same time? 3 (1 test, 2 Tranquility) Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Medium - Anti-Aliasing: Low - Shader Quality: High - Texture Quality: Medium - LOD Quality: High User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 28 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 12 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) ?: 7 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes?: No We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? No, it is an elegant solution. Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: No comments, had a smooth experience for the fleet size etc. Bountyhunter Bob Bespin Mining Guild 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 18:11:00 - [87] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): DX11 OS version: Win7 CPU: AMD FZ-8350 GPU: GTX 660Ti RAM: 32gig How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high):High User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? no Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: excellent Glibentine Masters of EG Corp Hand of Despair 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 18:12:00 - [88] - Quote Machine Info and Settings: DirectX - 11 OS - Win7 CPU - AMD PhenomX6 GPU - ATI Radeon HD5700 RAM - 4Gb Clients - 3 Graphic setting - low - Anti-Aliasing : low - Shader Quality: med - Texture Quality: med - LOD Quality: med User Experience: Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 25 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 10 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) : 5 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? - NO We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? - YES Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: - Makin Stuff Bloodthirsty Capitalists of Eve 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 18:13:00 - [89] - Quote DirectX version your client was running: DX9 OS version: Windows 7 CPU:Intel Core i7 Q 720 GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M RAM: 6.00 GB How many clients were you running at the same time? 3 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High - Anti-Aliasing: Disabled - Shader Quality: High - Texture Quality: High - LOD Quality: High User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 12.40 FFP Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 11.4 FFP Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 7 Noticable better Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? Didn't notice the difference. SelectedbyGODS State War Academy Caldari State 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 18:13:00 - [90] - Quote Machine Info and Settings: DirectX - 11 OS - Win7 CPU - AMD PhenomX6 GPU - ATI Radeon HD5700 RAM - 4Gb Clients - 3 Graphic setting - low - Anti-Aliasing : low - Shader Quality: med - Texture Quality: med - LOD Quality: med User Experience: Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 15 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 10 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) : 5 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? - NO We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? - YES Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: - Caterpil Hippo Eats Dwarf Flappy Chickens With Teeth 27 Posted - 2013.11.04 18:16:00 - [91] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX version: DX11 OS version: Windows 7 Home Premium CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4670k CPU @ 3.40 GHz GPU: Nvidia Geforce GTX 670 RAM: 16GB How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): - Anti-Aliasing: None - Shader Quality: High - Texture Quality: High - LOD Quality: High User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot -25 (Zoomed out) Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - 20 (Zoomed in) Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? 8 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? Didn't notice it Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Fist jump took ages and initiated emergency warp upon entering system Random missiles and lasers appeared directed at my ship even though I wasn't being aggressed (this occasionally happens on TQ, but not as much as tonight) There appeared to be an issue with chat channels where upon switching channels all the text would take around 10 seconds to display. Aken Thrawn Trask Industries Inc. 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 18:19:00 - [92] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): dx11 OS version: Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz (8 CPUs), ~3.4GHz GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 RAM: 8GB How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High - Anti-Aliasing: disabled - Shader Quality: High - Texture Quality: High - LOD Quality: High User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 15 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? 8 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? no Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: had more lag while hitting the POS (down to 5 fps) than while fighting at the gate. The only bugs I've noticed were chat related, like chat echo (write once, appears twice) and random lag while swiching tabs. I used MJD quite a few times and really had no delay and everything seemed smooth enough. Maximus Powerz Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic 1 Posted - 2013.11.04 18:19:00 - [93] - Quote DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): 9 OS version: Windows 7 CPU: Intel Q6600 GPU: GeForce 8800 GT RAM: 8GB How many clients were you running at the same time? 2 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Medium - Anti-Aliasing: Disabled - Shader Quality: Medium - Texture Quality: Medium - LOD Quality: Low User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 8 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 6 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? I didn't notice it. Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Cisco Basher Die Rentnergang V.e.G.A. 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 18:21:00 - [94] - Quote DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): 9 OS version: Win7-x64 SP1 CPU: i7-3520M CPU @ 2.90GHz GPU: Intel HD4000 RAM: 8 GB How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): - Anti-Aliasing: Disabled - Shader Quality: High - Texture Quality: High - LOD Quality: High User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 20 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 10 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? No Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Got poded, upgraded my clone, plugged in new chips. Skill queue is now messed up. It needs 30 seconds to show up and tell's me that I need as twice as much time to learn the current skill. Also I can not remap my skill attributes and I can not save the current mapping because of unassigned points. train man Endgame Alliance End Game Alliance 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 18:23:00 - [95] - Quote DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): dx9 GÇó OS version: Win 7 GÇó CPU: i7 GÇó GPU: gtx480 GÇó RAM: 16G GÇó How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 GÇó Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high - Anti-Aliasing: high - Shader Quality:high - Texture Quality:high - LOD Quality:high User Experience GÇó Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (5=same) GÇó Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no GÇó We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? no sh3wantstohurtyou Desert Pirates Cartel 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 18:23:00 - [96] - Quote DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): dx11 OS version: win7 CPU: i5 3120m GPU: GT640m 2gb RAM: 6gb How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): low - Anti-Aliasing: off - Shader Quality:low - Texture Quality:low - LOD Quality:low User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 7-14 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 2-4 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome)6 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? not crashing We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? no Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Dinsdale Pirannha Pirannha Corp 1402 Posted - 2013.11.04 18:25:00 - [97] - Quote DirectX version : 9 OS version: Windows 7 CPU: Intel i5-3300 3.0 Ghz GPU: GFOrce 210 589 Mhz RAM: 4 G How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): low - Anti-Aliasing: Disabled - Shader Quality: Low - Texture Quality: Low - LOD Quality: Low User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 10 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: N/a Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? None We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? No Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: It was very little different that other fleet fights I have been in, since I usually fight zoomed out. Mixim Fonulique Ratchet Industries Dark Aether 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 18:26:00 - [98] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): OS version: W 7 CPU:3.1 gig GPU: 512 mg RAM: 6 gig How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): medium - Anti-Aliasing: none - Shader Quality:low - Texture Quality:med - LOD Quality: med User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 12 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 3-5 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 9 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? a little but the trade was fair maxx jules Endgame Alliance End Game Alliance 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 18:26:00 - [99] - Quote Machine Info and Settings GÇó DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): dx11 GÇó OS version: Win7 GÇó CPU: i7 GÇó GPU: gtx5xx 2x GÇó RAM: 16G GÇó How many clients were you running at the same time? 2 GÇó Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high - Anti-Aliasing: High - Shader Quality:High - Texture Quality:High - LOD Quality:High User Experience GÇó Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? 5 GÇó Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? 1 client DC GÇó We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience?no Akmed Muhammed Widowmaker Ship Builders 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 18:26:00 - [100] - Quote running dx9 windows 8 ran somewhat slow I think it was due to the number of ships on the screen at one time and I didn't lose my harbinger or get podded YEAH ninjawolf The Omega Directive. The Methodical Alliance 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 18:31:00 - [101] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): DX 11 OS version: Windows XP SP3 CPU: Intell 6800 Dual Core 1.8GhZ GPU: Can't remember Make / Model. 256mb dedicated Memory 1.5GB Shared RAM: 8GB How many clients were you running at the same time? 2 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Medium Tranquility, Low Singularity - Anti-Aliasing: N/A - Shader Quality: N/A - Texture Quality: N/A - LOD Quality: N/A User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 10 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 12 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) N/A Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? 1 Crash which resulted in disconnect. We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? No. Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Not much difference for me as fleet fights are done zoomed out for me. The fight became easier to view when Time Dilation kicked in. Aiko Kurushio Conquering Darkness 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 18:35:00 - [102] - Quote DirectX version your client was running: DX9 OS version: Windows 7 Ultimate CPU: AMD Phenom II X6 1055T GPU: AMD Radeon HD 7950 RAM: 16GB DDR3 How many clients were you running at the same time? 2 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): - Anti-Aliasing: High - Shader Quality: High - Texture Quality: High - LOD Quality: High User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: ~20 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 7-10 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome): 6 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? Nope We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? Nope Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Everything ran smoothly, even if at somewhat low fps. I had all brackets on and was quite pleased with the fps I got Za Or Irata III Trek Alliance 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 18:39:00 - [103] - Quote DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information):dx9 OS version:windows 7 CPU:intel dualcore 2.20ghz GPU:Nvidia geforce gts250 RAM:4gig How many clients were you running at the same time?1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): - Anti-Aliasing: high - Shader Quality:high - Texture Quality:high - LOD Quality:high Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - n/a Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - n/a Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 6 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? No. Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: DeadNite 2 Girls - 1 Corp 14 Posted - 2013.11.04 18:43:00 - [104] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): DX9 OS version: 6.1 (Build 7601: SP1) CPU: i7-3820QM GPU: 2x AMD 7970m (Crossfire active) RAM: 16GB DDR3 How many clients were you running at the same time?: 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): HIGH - Anti-Aliasing: Disabled - Shader Quality: High - Texture Quality: High - LOD Quality: High User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 20-25 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in:10-15 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome): 3 - The SiSi client always performs worse than TQ on my box it seems. Did you experience any disconnects or crashes?: No We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience?: No Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Was a good test a part from the fleet invitation problem and the system population caps. Nam Dnilb Universal Frog 93 Posted - 2013.11.04 18:48:00 - [105] - Quote DirectX version your client was running: DX9 OS version: Windows 8 Pro CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad 9550 GPU: Nvidia Geforce GTX 660 RAM: 8GB DDR3 How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): - Anti-Aliasing: off - Shader Quality: High - Texture Quality: High - LOD Quality: High User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: ~7 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? No, nothing obvious. Mouse wheel response for zooming felt more sluggish though. Rabalina LaFlema LeroLero Corp 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 19:26:00 - [106] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): Dx11 OS version: Win 7 CPU: Intel-« CoreGäó2 Quad CPU Q8200 @ 2.33GHz GPU: AMD Radeon HD 6450 RAM: 3gb How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Low - Anti-Aliasing: Disabled - Shader Quality: Low - Texture Quality: Low - LOD Quality: Low User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 10 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 3 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 3 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? Yes Musashi Date 25TH miss 40 Posted - 2013.11.04 19:40:00 - [107] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): Running on DX9; the launcher settings says "! Your computer only supports DirectX 9" and the selection box has been greyed with DirectX9 in it. This was.. peculiar because my dxdiag clearly says I have DirectX 11 on. OS version:Win7 64bit CPU:Core2Duo [email protected] GPU:Radeon 4670 2Gb RAM:4Gb DDR2 How many clients were you running at the same time?Four clients Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): - Anti-Aliasing:Disabled - Shader Quality: Low - Texture Quality: Low - LOD Quality:Low User Experience Total Memory before Poitot jump: about ~600Mb Total Memory after Poitot jump: ~1,100Mb FPS went down to below 5fps during the fight, but CPU performance was around 45~55% and was really impressive. Some of my clients was just peaking near 50% utilization, and only the target caller (assigned sentries) peaked up to 95%~100% CPU. Working set size is 818Mb on the target caller, and 764~706Mb on the others. Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out:~5 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in:~5 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome)3 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No client crashed for this masstest We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? Oh so that was what I saw while zooming out on my ship, the muddied colors/textures definitely caught my attention at low settings. I just tested it again and it starts at 11 zoom buttons out, then at 22 and then it stays the same after that. So.. three levels? Maybe increase the second one to around 22 and the third to 30. The effect is also present in the fitting window, and I can see only 2 levels which seems to start at 4 mousewheels out. And it looks like the feature is missing in both the ship hangar view and the captains quarters mode. [i] Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: The usual module lag and overview lag is there, even as I was zoomed out and away from the fray. There was this thing I stumbled upon though, with a Survey Scanner for asteroids. When pressing CTRL on the keyboard, I can lock objects from the overview, fleet broadcast history and the Survey scanner results. While pressing X on the keyboard, I can broadcast targets from the overview, the fleet broadcast history, but not on the survey scanner results? I tested this a couple of times, and it seems the X broadcast key is broken for the survey scanner results window. Dumnomii The Fated E.Y 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 19:47:00 - [108] - Quote OK rather than dual client this time , dual boxed it , now can any one explain to me why a 6 year old machine running 32Bit Vista OS, 4GB ram , 512MB video Ram out performs a 3 month old 64 bit 8GB ram , windows 8 machine with a 1GB graphis card? Cant dual client the windows 8 box at all its horrible :( Sat in station spinning Vista is making 60 FPS, Windows 8 is doing 20 FPS. Box 1 GÇó DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): Client set to 11, actually autosets to 9 GÇó OS version: Vitsa Ultimate SP2 GÇó CPU: Intel Core 2, Quad core 2.4GHz GÇó GPU: ATI radeon HD 3800, 512MB GÇó RAM: 4GB GÇó How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 GÇó Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High - Anti-Aliasing: - Shader Quality: - Texture Quality: - LOD Quality: User Experience GÇó Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 20 GÇó Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 14 GÇó Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5 GÇó Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? None GÇó We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? Slightly, but didnt seem signifcantly worse than normal GÇó Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Much smoother than last time, annoying gate jump anmination got frozen, jumping through to Poirot sat there for 5 minutes wandering if I had arrived in system as could see warp scram messages but still had gate animation, once I started taking damage I kind of guessed I must have arrived.. Box 2 GÇó DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): 11 GÇó OS version: Windows 8 GÇó CPU: Intel I5 - 3330, Quad Core , 3GHz GÇó GPU: Nvidia GeForce GT 620, 1GB GÇó RAM: 8 GB GÇó How many clients were you running at the same time? GÇó Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High - Anti-Aliasing: Disabled - Shader Quality: High - Texture Quality: High - LOD Quality: High User Experience GÇó Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 13 GÇó Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 4 GÇó Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 3 GÇó Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No GÇó We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? Slow frame rate discouraged to much zooming GÇó Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Okay but a bit laggy baldizar Ratchet Industries Dark Aether 1 Posted - 2013.11.04 20:08:00 - [109] - Quote DirectX :9 OS version:windows xp pro 64 CPU:Intel-« CoreGäó2 Quad Processor Q9450 (12M Cache, 2.66 GHz, 1333 MHz FSB) GPU:NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 - 576.0 MHz RAM:8GB How many clients were you running at the same time?=1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high):high - Anti-Aliasing: Disabled - Shader Quality:high - Texture Quality:high - LOD Quality:high User Experience was better than previous large group encounters even though I had an issue with a crash on exiting station. Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: approx 55>60 fps Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: aprox 13>15fps Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? 9 Gaia Ma'chello V.I.C.E. 78 Posted - 2013.11.04 20:44:00 - [110] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): 9 OS version: OSX 10.7.5 CPU: 2.66 GHz Intel Core i7 GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M 512 MB RAM: 8 GB 1067 MHz DDR3 How many clients were you running at the same time? One Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Medium - Anti-Aliasing: Off - Shader Quality: Medium - Texture Quality: Medium - LOD Quality: Low User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 3.5 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 2.5 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 4 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? Yes, for example the POS force field never appeared for me. Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: The space scene took a long time to load whenever I entered a new area, either from a gate jump or just warping to another grid. The main example: I never saw the POS force field. The POS was destroyed before it loaded. Also it took a looonnnggg time for my ship to appear. Running the test: better fleet formation is needed. Use adverts or something. Arctic Kalkoken Southern Cross Empire Flying Dangerous 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 22:09:00 - [111] - Quote DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): 9 OS version: OS X Version 10.9 CPU: 3.4 GFHz Intel Core i7 GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX 2048 MB RAM: 32GB 1600 MHz DDR3 How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High - Anti-Aliasing: Disabled - Shader Quality: High - Texture Quality: High - LOD Quality: High User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: unk Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: unk Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 2 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? YES We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? Yes, for example the POS force field never appeared for me. Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: My client crashed while I was attacking the the tower, I attempted to log back in, however my launcher froze as well. 5 hours later I was able to get my launcher to launch the game. The game was a bit laggy (large fleet), Slow frame rates while we were at the X-B gate (during warp) reduced playability. onatural Aegri somnia vana 0 Posted - 2013.11.04 23:28:00 - [112] - Quote DirectX version your client was running: DX11 OS version: Windows 8 Pro CPU: Intel Core i5 2500k (oc @4.3ghz) GPU: radeon 7950 RAM: 16GB DDR3 How many clients were you running at the same time? 2 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high) - Anti-Aliasing: High - Shader Quality: High - Texture Quality: High - LOD Quality: High User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 55 -zoomed in: 25 Had no DC, did feel slight lag (to be expected!) Overall a good smooth experience Thycoon Patrician Space Incorporation Patrician Space Incorporation Holding Alliance 3 Posted - 2013.11.05 09:49:00 - [113] - Quote Machine Info and Settings DirectX version your client6 was running: DX11 OS version: Windows 7 Professional 64-bit CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3820 CPU @ 3.60GHz (8 CPUs) 3.8GHz (Turbo boost) GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690, Display Memory: 4014 MB RAM: 65.536 GB RAM DDR3 (OC to 1600 MHz) How many clients were you running at the same time? 7 (frigs) Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Optimized Settings for Performance All clients running in "Fixed Window", Window Size: 1920x1080, Present Interval: Interval one Effects: Camera Shake set Miscellaneous: none set Anti-Aliasing: Disabled Shader Quality: Low Texture Quality: Medium LOD Quality: Low User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Pitot, zoomed out: between 15 and 21 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Pitot, zoomed in: between 15 and 21 Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): 15 and 21 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) Not participated in big fleet fights on TQ but a "5"! Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? None We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? Not noticed because of overall lagging! Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: No major problems with all 7 clients! After the first jump again some ships from my clients are about 1 Mill. km from the Gate/cyno-suppliers away but no crashes. FPS changed plus minus 5 while changing brackets. Overall the performance was ok - but if there are more capitals and bubbles than it will be difficult! There is still a lot of space for performance improvement from server side! CCP Zorba C C P C C P Alliance 71 Posted - 2013.11.05 11:29:00 - [114] - Quote Musashi Date wrote: Machine Info and Settings DirectX version your client was running (Cntrl+F to see this information): Running on DX9; the launcher settings says "! Your computer only supports DirectX 9" and the selection box has been greyed with DirectX9 in it. This was.. peculiar because my dxdiag clearly says I have DirectX 11 on. OS version:Win7 64bit CPU:Core2Duo [email protected] GPU:Radeon 4670 2Gb RAM:4Gb DDR2 I'm not sure what Windows is reporting but that card does not support DX11, only DX10 and 10.1. Space Knight Dadunur Nuke Online 0 Posted - 2013.11.05 13:28:00 - [115] - Quote DirectX version your client was running :Dx11 OS version: Windows 7 x64 BIT CPU: Intel Celeron G555 2.70GHz GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 RAM: G.Skill RipJawsZ 8 GB DDR3-160 How many clients were you running at the same time? 3 Clients Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): medium - Anti-Aliasing: medium - Shader Quality: medium - Texture Quality: medium - LOD Quality: medium User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed out: 10 - 20 Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot - zoomed in: 10-15 Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? 5 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No We added texture LODing to reduce the client memory, textures loading when zooming in and out can be delayed in heavy scenes. Did you feel this degraded the visual experience? Yeah     Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page]

Copyright © 2006-2025, Chribba - OMG Labs. All Rights Reserved. - perf 0,05s, ref 20251008/0131 EVE-Online™ and Eve imagery © CCP.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.