Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Freeside
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 20:24:00 -
[1]
I knew it was you from the second I read the thread title, Remedial. I don't think there's another CEO in the galaxy with this problem. 
|

Freeside
|
Posted - 2006.02.28 03:07:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Kel Shek I don't even want to think about how the politics in such an absurdly huge corp would be...
Imagine a swarm of bees.
...
...
...
That's it.
|

Freeside
|
Posted - 2006.03.09 05:21:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Happydayz Edited by: Happydayz on 07/03/2006 21:52:43 Can we get an answer from CCP on this?
Pleeeeeeeeease?
|

Freeside
|
Posted - 2006.04.04 21:11:00 -
[4]
I don't think this has been said before but it really needs to be said HERE AND NOW!! Please release sovereignty ok CCP?
TIA
|

Freeside
|
Posted - 2006.04.06 20:53:00 -
[5]
Release sovereignty or I kill the kitten.
Naw I'm just kidding, it's already dead. 
|

Freeside
|
Posted - 2006.04.12 03:22:00 -
[6]
Pwetty Pwease?
|

Freeside
|
Posted - 2006.04.15 05:52:00 -
[7]
Edited by: Freeside on 15/04/2006 05:52:02 My son is dying of bone-itis and his dying wish is for you to release this skill. 
|

Freeside
|
Posted - 2006.04.22 21:28:00 -
[8]
Remedial Alt. #00367 hereby requesting official response.
|

Freeside
|
Posted - 2006.04.24 15:49:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Keldjos Falzir Chiming in again to say that, at this point, ANY kind of official response would be nice, including variations on "OMG GOON RUSH!!!" and "fofofofofo"
|

Freeside
|
Posted - 2006.04.27 13:39:00 -
[10]
Pweeeeeease?
|

Freeside
|
Posted - 2006.05.08 14:44:00 -
[11]
Edited by: Freeside on 08/05/2006 14:49:58
Originally by: Shinhan Sorry for not reading entire thread (I did read first 3 pages) but its just too big.
Since EVE corps/alliances is complicated, why not make it more complex? (no Im not sarcastic)
My idea is adding another layer, where sub-corps (divisions) have limit of 1300. Corp could then be made up of several divisions. All the divisions could have both shared and unique hangars, shared and unique chat etc.
The way I see it Goons have objections with non-shared hangars. Adding hangars that can be shared between corps (alliance hangar) would probably be enough. But with big corps logistics starts really piling up.
Btw. IRL big corps are never monolithic AFAIK. Make corps able to subdivide for easier logistics.
While being able to create sectors or segments within a corp might make things easier, it doesn't alter the fact that trying to run a single corp, but being forced to break it up into two seperate corps is a logistical nightmare, especially for a corp as red as GF. Offices/hangars/standings/etc. create twice the amount of work for our already overworked directors. Because of the limitations of the alliance system, and because we are already in an alliance with numerous non-goon corps, creating a faceted goonfleet alliance just isn't feasible.
You're right about one thing though: logistically, being able to break a corporation into smaller segments would potentially make things easier for those corps who so desire (edit: assuming you retain the ability to manage things such as offices/standings/hangars on a corp-wide scale as easily as you can under the current system). The current situation, however, is not the same as what you're describing, and your proposal would in all likelihood require a LOT more work than what we've asked for. It would definitely make it easier to micromanage a corp, but micromanagement isn't always desired or feasible.
But Tux has replied to our thread in General, and that's all we've ever wanted. 
|
|
|