EVE Search - BLUE PRINT ISSUES AND A REQUEST TO HELP US !!!

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

BLUE PRINT ISSUES AND A REQUEST TO HELP US !!!

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 .. 13 :: [one page]
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Lord Jester	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:49:00 - [1] It has become more and more complex for me to keep track of all my blueprint orginals and blueprint copies. I mean sorting thru 800+ BPO / BPCs (unknowen numbers of each ) it is rather hard on a person sorting thru that many 1 at a time...so.........what idea i have is like...... Take the windows short cut icon (the folded cornner) and implament it to the blue print copies only.. That would help the researcher more than most fixes in the game....just a little adjustment on the picture of the copies.....yea I know it seems like a easy , small task ...but I am good at computer art and stuff so I know it would take a lot from the DEV's but if it can somehow be placed in the game....I am sure the whole eve world would thank them more and more every time they go to use a copy or a orginal... So in closing I ask this..... If you think what I spoke of above is what we need or dont need.....then let your thoughts be knowen on this thread Thanks... Lord Jester. N.E.O. And ...if its in the wrong place then pls admins move to the correct thread.........
Lord Jester	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:49:00 - [2] It has become more and more complex for me to keep track of all my blueprint orginals and blueprint copies. I mean sorting thru 800+ BPO / BPCs (unknowen numbers of each ) it is rather hard on a person sorting thru that many 1 at a time...so.........what idea i have is like...... Take the windows short cut icon (the folded cornner) and implament it to the blue print copies only.. That would help the researcher more than most fixes in the game....just a little adjustment on the picture of the copies.....yea I know it seems like a easy , small task ...but I am good at computer art and stuff so I know it would take a lot from the DEV's but if it can somehow be placed in the game....I am sure the whole eve world would thank them more and more every time they go to use a copy or a orginal... So in closing I ask this..... If you think what I spoke of above is what we need or dont need.....then let your thoughts be knowen on this thread Thanks... Lord Jester. N.E.O. And ...if its in the wrong place then pls admins move to the correct thread.........
Lord Jester	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:49:00 - [3] It has become more and more complex for me to keep track of all my blueprint orginals and blueprint copies. I mean sorting thru 800+ BPO / BPCs (unknowen numbers of each ) it is rather hard on a person sorting thru that many 1 at a time...so.........what idea i have is like...... Take the windows short cut icon (the folded cornner) and implament it to the blue print copies only.. That would help the researcher more than most fixes in the game....just a little adjustment on the picture of the copies.....yea I know it seems like a easy , small task ...but I am good at computer art and stuff so I know it would take a lot from the DEV's but if it can somehow be placed in the game....I am sure the whole eve world would thank them more and more every time they go to use a copy or a orginal... So in closing I ask this..... If you think what I spoke of above is what we need or dont need.....then let your thoughts be knowen on this thread Thanks... Lord Jester. N.E.O. And ...if its in the wrong place then pls admins move to the correct thread.........
Lord Jester	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:49:00 - [4] It has become more and more complex for me to keep track of all my blueprint orginals and blueprint copies. I mean sorting thru 800+ BPO / BPCs (unknowen numbers of each ) it is rather hard on a person sorting thru that many 1 at a time...so.........what idea i have is like...... Take the windows short cut icon (the folded cornner) and implament it to the blue print copies only.. That would help the researcher more than most fixes in the game....just a little adjustment on the picture of the copies.....yea I know it seems like a easy , small task ...but I am good at computer art and stuff so I know it would take a lot from the DEV's but if it can somehow be placed in the game....I am sure the whole eve world would thank them more and more every time they go to use a copy or a orginal... So in closing I ask this..... If you think what I spoke of above is what we need or dont need.....then let your thoughts be knowen on this thread Thanks... Lord Jester. N.E.O. And ...if its in the wrong place then pls admins move to the correct thread.........
Lord Jester	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:49:00 - [5] It has become more and more complex for me to keep track of all my blueprint orginals and blueprint copies. I mean sorting thru 800+ BPO / BPCs (unknowen numbers of each ) it is rather hard on a person sorting thru that many 1 at a time...so.........what idea i have is like...... Take the windows short cut icon (the folded cornner) and implament it to the blue print copies only.. That would help the researcher more than most fixes in the game....just a little adjustment on the picture of the copies.....yea I know it seems like a easy , small task ...but I am good at computer art and stuff so I know it would take a lot from the DEV's but if it can somehow be placed in the game....I am sure the whole eve world would thank them more and more every time they go to use a copy or a orginal... So in closing I ask this..... If you think what I spoke of above is what we need or dont need.....then let your thoughts be knowen on this thread Thanks... Lord Jester. N.E.O. And ...if its in the wrong place then pls admins move to the correct thread.........
Lord Jester	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:49:00 - [6] It has become more and more complex for me to keep track of all my blueprint orginals and blueprint copies. I mean sorting thru 800+ BPO / BPCs (unknowen numbers of each ) it is rather hard on a person sorting thru that many 1 at a time...so.........what idea i have is like...... Take the windows short cut icon (the folded cornner) and implament it to the blue print copies only.. That would help the researcher more than most fixes in the game....just a little adjustment on the picture of the copies.....yea I know it seems like a easy , small task ...but I am good at computer art and stuff so I know it would take a lot from the DEV's but if it can somehow be placed in the game....I am sure the whole eve world would thank them more and more every time they go to use a copy or a orginal... So in closing I ask this..... If you think what I spoke of above is what we need or dont need.....then let your thoughts be knowen on this thread Thanks... Lord Jester. N.E.O. And ...if its in the wrong place then pls admins move to the correct thread.........
Lord Jester	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:49:00 - [7] It has become more and more complex for me to keep track of all my blueprint orginals and blueprint copies. I mean sorting thru 800+ BPO / BPCs (unknowen numbers of each ) it is rather hard on a person sorting thru that many 1 at a time...so.........what idea i have is like...... Take the windows short cut icon (the folded cornner) and implament it to the blue print copies only.. That would help the researcher more than most fixes in the game....just a little adjustment on the picture of the copies.....yea I know it seems like a easy , small task ...but I am good at computer art and stuff so I know it would take a lot from the DEV's but if it can somehow be placed in the game....I am sure the whole eve world would thank them more and more every time they go to use a copy or a orginal... So in closing I ask this..... If you think what I spoke of above is what we need or dont need.....then let your thoughts be knowen on this thread Thanks... Lord Jester. N.E.O. And ...if its in the wrong place then pls admins move to the correct thread.........
Lord Jester	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:49:00 - [8] It has become more and more complex for me to keep track of all my blueprint orginals and blueprint copies. I mean sorting thru 800+ BPO / BPCs (unknowen numbers of each ) it is rather hard on a person sorting thru that many 1 at a time...so.........what idea i have is like...... Take the windows short cut icon (the folded cornner) and implament it to the blue print copies only.. That would help the researcher more than most fixes in the game....just a little adjustment on the picture of the copies.....yea I know it seems like a easy , small task ...but I am good at computer art and stuff so I know it would take a lot from the DEV's but if it can somehow be placed in the game....I am sure the whole eve world would thank them more and more every time they go to use a copy or a orginal... So in closing I ask this..... If you think what I spoke of above is what we need or dont need.....then let your thoughts be knowen on this thread Thanks... Lord Jester. N.E.O. And ...if its in the wrong place then pls admins move to the correct thread.........
Lord Jester	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:49:00 - [9] It has become more and more complex for me to keep track of all my blueprint orginals and blueprint copies. I mean sorting thru 800+ BPO / BPCs (unknowen numbers of each ) it is rather hard on a person sorting thru that many 1 at a time...so.........what idea i have is like...... Take the windows short cut icon (the folded cornner) and implament it to the blue print copies only.. That would help the researcher more than most fixes in the game....just a little adjustment on the picture of the copies.....yea I know it seems like a easy , small task ...but I am good at computer art and stuff so I know it would take a lot from the DEV's but if it can somehow be placed in the game....I am sure the whole eve world would thank them more and more every time they go to use a copy or a orginal... So in closing I ask this..... If you think what I spoke of above is what we need or dont need.....then let your thoughts be knowen on this thread Thanks... Lord Jester. N.E.O. And ...if its in the wrong place then pls admins move to the correct thread.........
Lord Jester	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:49:00 - [10] It has become more and more complex for me to keep track of all my blueprint orginals and blueprint copies. I mean sorting thru 800+ BPO / BPCs (unknowen numbers of each ) it is rather hard on a person sorting thru that many 1 at a time...so.........what idea i have is like...... Take the windows short cut icon (the folded cornner) and implament it to the blue print copies only.. That would help the researcher more than most fixes in the game....just a little adjustment on the picture of the copies.....yea I know it seems like a easy , small task ...but I am good at computer art and stuff so I know it would take a lot from the DEV's but if it can somehow be placed in the game....I am sure the whole eve world would thank them more and more every time they go to use a copy or a orginal... So in closing I ask this..... If you think what I spoke of above is what we need or dont need.....then let your thoughts be knowen on this thread Thanks... Lord Jester. N.E.O. And ...if its in the wrong place then pls admins move to the correct thread.........
Lord Jester	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:49:00 - [11] It has become more and more complex for me to keep track of all my blueprint orginals and blueprint copies. I mean sorting thru 800+ BPO / BPCs (unknowen numbers of each ) it is rather hard on a person sorting thru that many 1 at a time...so.........what idea i have is like...... Take the windows short cut icon (the folded cornner) and implament it to the blue print copies only.. That would help the researcher more than most fixes in the game....just a little adjustment on the picture of the copies.....yea I know it seems like a easy , small task ...but I am good at computer art and stuff so I know it would take a lot from the DEV's but if it can somehow be placed in the game....I am sure the whole eve world would thank them more and more every time they go to use a copy or a orginal... So in closing I ask this..... If you think what I spoke of above is what we need or dont need.....then let your thoughts be knowen on this thread Thanks... Lord Jester. N.E.O. And ...if its in the wrong place then pls admins move to the correct thread.........
Lord Jester	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:49:00 - [12] It has become more and more complex for me to keep track of all my blueprint orginals and blueprint copies. I mean sorting thru 800+ BPO / BPCs (unknowen numbers of each ) it is rather hard on a person sorting thru that many 1 at a time...so.........what idea i have is like...... Take the windows short cut icon (the folded cornner) and implament it to the blue print copies only.. That would help the researcher more than most fixes in the game....just a little adjustment on the picture of the copies.....yea I know it seems like a easy , small task ...but I am good at computer art and stuff so I know it would take a lot from the DEV's but if it can somehow be placed in the game....I am sure the whole eve world would thank them more and more every time they go to use a copy or a orginal... So in closing I ask this..... If you think what I spoke of above is what we need or dont need.....then let your thoughts be knowen on this thread Thanks... Lord Jester. N.E.O. And ...if its in the wrong place then pls admins move to the correct thread.........
Lord Jester	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:49:00 - [13] It has become more and more complex for me to keep track of all my blueprint orginals and blueprint copies. I mean sorting thru 800+ BPO / BPCs (unknowen numbers of each ) it is rather hard on a person sorting thru that many 1 at a time...so.........what idea i have is like...... Take the windows short cut icon (the folded cornner) and implament it to the blue print copies only.. That would help the researcher more than most fixes in the game....just a little adjustment on the picture of the copies.....yea I know it seems like a easy , small task ...but I am good at computer art and stuff so I know it would take a lot from the DEV's but if it can somehow be placed in the game....I am sure the whole eve world would thank them more and more every time they go to use a copy or a orginal... So in closing I ask this..... If you think what I spoke of above is what we need or dont need.....then let your thoughts be knowen on this thread Thanks... Lord Jester. N.E.O. And ...if its in the wrong place then pls admins move to the correct thread.........
Lord Jester	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:49:00 - [14] It has become more and more complex for me to keep track of all my blueprint orginals and blueprint copies. I mean sorting thru 800+ BPO / BPCs (unknowen numbers of each ) it is rather hard on a person sorting thru that many 1 at a time...so.........what idea i have is like...... Take the windows short cut icon (the folded cornner) and implament it to the blue print copies only.. That would help the researcher more than most fixes in the game....just a little adjustment on the picture of the copies.....yea I know it seems like a easy , small task ...but I am good at computer art and stuff so I know it would take a lot from the DEV's but if it can somehow be placed in the game....I am sure the whole eve world would thank them more and more every time they go to use a copy or a orginal... So in closing I ask this..... If you think what I spoke of above is what we need or dont need.....then let your thoughts be knowen on this thread Thanks... Lord Jester. N.E.O. And ...if its in the wrong place then pls admins move to the correct thread.........
Lord Jester	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:49:00 - [15] It has become more and more complex for me to keep track of all my blueprint orginals and blueprint copies. I mean sorting thru 800+ BPO / BPCs (unknowen numbers of each ) it is rather hard on a person sorting thru that many 1 at a time...so.........what idea i have is like...... Take the windows short cut icon (the folded cornner) and implament it to the blue print copies only.. That would help the researcher more than most fixes in the game....just a little adjustment on the picture of the copies.....yea I know it seems like a easy , small task ...but I am good at computer art and stuff so I know it would take a lot from the DEV's but if it can somehow be placed in the game....I am sure the whole eve world would thank them more and more every time they go to use a copy or a orginal... So in closing I ask this..... If you think what I spoke of above is what we need or dont need.....then let your thoughts be knowen on this thread Thanks... Lord Jester. N.E.O. And ...if its in the wrong place then pls admins move to the correct thread.........
Lord Jester	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:49:00 - [16] It has become more and more complex for me to keep track of all my blueprint orginals and blueprint copies. I mean sorting thru 800+ BPO / BPCs (unknowen numbers of each ) it is rather hard on a person sorting thru that many 1 at a time...so.........what idea i have is like...... Take the windows short cut icon (the folded cornner) and implament it to the blue print copies only.. That would help the researcher more than most fixes in the game....just a little adjustment on the picture of the copies.....yea I know it seems like a easy , small task ...but I am good at computer art and stuff so I know it would take a lot from the DEV's but if it can somehow be placed in the game....I am sure the whole eve world would thank them more and more every time they go to use a copy or a orginal... So in closing I ask this..... If you think what I spoke of above is what we need or dont need.....then let your thoughts be knowen on this thread Thanks... Lord Jester. N.E.O. And ...if its in the wrong place then pls admins move to the correct thread.........
Lord Jester	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:49:00 - [17] It has become more and more complex for me to keep track of all my blueprint orginals and blueprint copies. I mean sorting thru 800+ BPO / BPCs (unknowen numbers of each ) it is rather hard on a person sorting thru that many 1 at a time...so.........what idea i have is like...... Take the windows short cut icon (the folded cornner) and implament it to the blue print copies only.. That would help the researcher more than most fixes in the game....just a little adjustment on the picture of the copies.....yea I know it seems like a easy , small task ...but I am good at computer art and stuff so I know it would take a lot from the DEV's but if it can somehow be placed in the game....I am sure the whole eve world would thank them more and more every time they go to use a copy or a orginal... So in closing I ask this..... If you think what I spoke of above is what we need or dont need.....then let your thoughts be knowen on this thread Thanks... Lord Jester. N.E.O. And ...if its in the wrong place then pls admins move to the correct thread.........
Lord Jester	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:49:00 - [18] It has become more and more complex for me to keep track of all my blueprint orginals and blueprint copies. I mean sorting thru 800+ BPO / BPCs (unknowen numbers of each ) it is rather hard on a person sorting thru that many 1 at a time...so.........what idea i have is like...... Take the windows short cut icon (the folded cornner) and implament it to the blue print copies only.. That would help the researcher more than most fixes in the game....just a little adjustment on the picture of the copies.....yea I know it seems like a easy , small task ...but I am good at computer art and stuff so I know it would take a lot from the DEV's but if it can somehow be placed in the game....I am sure the whole eve world would thank them more and more every time they go to use a copy or a orginal... So in closing I ask this..... If you think what I spoke of above is what we need or dont need.....then let your thoughts be knowen on this thread Thanks... Lord Jester. N.E.O. And ...if its in the wrong place then pls admins move to the correct thread.........
Lord Jester	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:49:00 - [19] It has become more and more complex for me to keep track of all my blueprint orginals and blueprint copies. I mean sorting thru 800+ BPO / BPCs (unknowen numbers of each ) it is rather hard on a person sorting thru that many 1 at a time...so.........what idea i have is like...... Take the windows short cut icon (the folded cornner) and implament it to the blue print copies only.. That would help the researcher more than most fixes in the game....just a little adjustment on the picture of the copies.....yea I know it seems like a easy , small task ...but I am good at computer art and stuff so I know it would take a lot from the DEV's but if it can somehow be placed in the game....I am sure the whole eve world would thank them more and more every time they go to use a copy or a orginal... So in closing I ask this..... If you think what I spoke of above is what we need or dont need.....then let your thoughts be knowen on this thread Thanks... Lord Jester. N.E.O. And ...if its in the wrong place then pls admins move to the correct thread.........
Lord Jester	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:49:00 - [20] It has become more and more complex for me to keep track of all my blueprint orginals and blueprint copies. I mean sorting thru 800+ BPO / BPCs (unknowen numbers of each ) it is rather hard on a person sorting thru that many 1 at a time...so.........what idea i have is like...... Take the windows short cut icon (the folded cornner) and implament it to the blue print copies only.. That would help the researcher more than most fixes in the game....just a little adjustment on the picture of the copies.....yea I know it seems like a easy , small task ...but I am good at computer art and stuff so I know it would take a lot from the DEV's but if it can somehow be placed in the game....I am sure the whole eve world would thank them more and more every time they go to use a copy or a orginal... So in closing I ask this..... If you think what I spoke of above is what we need or dont need.....then let your thoughts be knowen on this thread Thanks... Lord Jester. N.E.O. And ...if its in the wrong place then pls admins move to the correct thread.........
Lord Jester	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:49:00 - [21] It has become more and more complex for me to keep track of all my blueprint orginals and blueprint copies. I mean sorting thru 800+ BPO / BPCs (unknowen numbers of each ) it is rather hard on a person sorting thru that many 1 at a time...so.........what idea i have is like...... Take the windows short cut icon (the folded cornner) and implament it to the blue print copies only.. That would help the researcher more than most fixes in the game....just a little adjustment on the picture of the copies.....yea I know it seems like a easy , small task ...but I am good at computer art and stuff so I know it would take a lot from the DEV's but if it can somehow be placed in the game....I am sure the whole eve world would thank them more and more every time they go to use a copy or a orginal... So in closing I ask this..... If you think what I spoke of above is what we need or dont need.....then let your thoughts be knowen on this thread Thanks... Lord Jester. N.E.O. And ...if its in the wrong place then pls admins move to the correct thread.........
Lord Jester	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:49:00 - [22] It has become more and more complex for me to keep track of all my blueprint orginals and blueprint copies. I mean sorting thru 800+ BPO / BPCs (unknowen numbers of each ) it is rather hard on a person sorting thru that many 1 at a time...so.........what idea i have is like...... Take the windows short cut icon (the folded cornner) and implament it to the blue print copies only.. That would help the researcher more than most fixes in the game....just a little adjustment on the picture of the copies.....yea I know it seems like a easy , small task ...but I am good at computer art and stuff so I know it would take a lot from the DEV's but if it can somehow be placed in the game....I am sure the whole eve world would thank them more and more every time they go to use a copy or a orginal... So in closing I ask this..... If you think what I spoke of above is what we need or dont need.....then let your thoughts be knowen on this thread Thanks... Lord Jester. N.E.O. And ...if its in the wrong place then pls admins move to the correct thread.........
Lord Jester	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:49:00 - [23] It has become more and more complex for me to keep track of all my blueprint orginals and blueprint copies. I mean sorting thru 800+ BPO / BPCs (unknowen numbers of each ) it is rather hard on a person sorting thru that many 1 at a time...so.........what idea i have is like...... Take the windows short cut icon (the folded cornner) and implament it to the blue print copies only.. That would help the researcher more than most fixes in the game....just a little adjustment on the picture of the copies.....yea I know it seems like a easy , small task ...but I am good at computer art and stuff so I know it would take a lot from the DEV's but if it can somehow be placed in the game....I am sure the whole eve world would thank them more and more every time they go to use a copy or a orginal... So in closing I ask this..... If you think what I spoke of above is what we need or dont need.....then let your thoughts be knowen on this thread Thanks... Lord Jester. N.E.O. And ...if its in the wrong place then pls admins move to the correct thread.........
Lord Jester	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:49:00 - [24] It has become more and more complex for me to keep track of all my blueprint orginals and blueprint copies. I mean sorting thru 800+ BPO / BPCs (unknowen numbers of each ) it is rather hard on a person sorting thru that many 1 at a time...so.........what idea i have is like...... Take the windows short cut icon (the folded cornner) and implament it to the blue print copies only.. That would help the researcher more than most fixes in the game....just a little adjustment on the picture of the copies.....yea I know it seems like a easy , small task ...but I am good at computer art and stuff so I know it would take a lot from the DEV's but if it can somehow be placed in the game....I am sure the whole eve world would thank them more and more every time they go to use a copy or a orginal... So in closing I ask this..... If you think what I spoke of above is what we need or dont need.....then let your thoughts be knowen on this thread Thanks... Lord Jester. N.E.O. And ...if its in the wrong place then pls admins move to the correct thread.........
Deja Thoris	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:51:00 - [25] If you sort them per type (or name - cant recall) then the last one is the original. There was a dev response on why it's a PITA to give the originals a different icon. Can't recall where it is though.
Deja Thoris	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:51:00 - [26] If you sort them per type (or name - cant recall) then the last one is the original. There was a dev response on why it's a PITA to give the originals a different icon. Can't recall where it is though.
Deja Thoris	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:51:00 - [27] If you sort them per type (or name - cant recall) then the last one is the original. There was a dev response on why it's a PITA to give the originals a different icon. Can't recall where it is though.
Deja Thoris	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:51:00 - [28] If you sort them per type (or name - cant recall) then the last one is the original. There was a dev response on why it's a PITA to give the originals a different icon. Can't recall where it is though.
Deja Thoris	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:51:00 - [29] If you sort them per type (or name - cant recall) then the last one is the original. There was a dev response on why it's a PITA to give the originals a different icon. Can't recall where it is though.
Deja Thoris	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:51:00 - [30] If you sort them per type (or name - cant recall) then the last one is the original. There was a dev response on why it's a PITA to give the originals a different icon. Can't recall where it is though.
Deja Thoris	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:51:00 - [31] If you sort them per type (or name - cant recall) then the last one is the original. There was a dev response on why it's a PITA to give the originals a different icon. Can't recall where it is though.
Deja Thoris	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:51:00 - [32] If you sort them per type (or name - cant recall) then the last one is the original. There was a dev response on why it's a PITA to give the originals a different icon. Can't recall where it is though.
Deja Thoris	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:51:00 - [33] If you sort them per type (or name - cant recall) then the last one is the original. There was a dev response on why it's a PITA to give the originals a different icon. Can't recall where it is though.
Deja Thoris	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:51:00 - [34] If you sort them per type (or name - cant recall) then the last one is the original. There was a dev response on why it's a PITA to give the originals a different icon. Can't recall where it is though.
Deja Thoris	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:51:00 - [35] If you sort them per type (or name - cant recall) then the last one is the original. There was a dev response on why it's a PITA to give the originals a different icon. Can't recall where it is though.
Deja Thoris	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:51:00 - [36] If you sort them per type (or name - cant recall) then the last one is the original. There was a dev response on why it's a PITA to give the originals a different icon. Can't recall where it is though.
Deja Thoris	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:51:00 - [37] If you sort them per type (or name - cant recall) then the last one is the original. There was a dev response on why it's a PITA to give the originals a different icon. Can't recall where it is though.
Deja Thoris	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:51:00 - [38] If you sort them per type (or name - cant recall) then the last one is the original. There was a dev response on why it's a PITA to give the originals a different icon. Can't recall where it is though.
Deja Thoris	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:51:00 - [39] If you sort them per type (or name - cant recall) then the last one is the original. There was a dev response on why it's a PITA to give the originals a different icon. Can't recall where it is though.
Deja Thoris	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:51:00 - [40] If you sort them per type (or name - cant recall) then the last one is the original. There was a dev response on why it's a PITA to give the originals a different icon. Can't recall where it is though.
Deja Thoris	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:51:00 - [41] If you sort them per type (or name - cant recall) then the last one is the original. There was a dev response on why it's a PITA to give the originals a different icon. Can't recall where it is though.
Deja Thoris	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:51:00 - [42] If you sort them per type (or name - cant recall) then the last one is the original. There was a dev response on why it's a PITA to give the originals a different icon. Can't recall where it is though.
Deja Thoris	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:51:00 - [43] If you sort them per type (or name - cant recall) then the last one is the original. There was a dev response on why it's a PITA to give the originals a different icon. Can't recall where it is though.
Deja Thoris	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:51:00 - [44] If you sort them per type (or name - cant recall) then the last one is the original. There was a dev response on why it's a PITA to give the originals a different icon. Can't recall where it is though.
Deja Thoris	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:51:00 - [45] If you sort them per type (or name - cant recall) then the last one is the original. There was a dev response on why it's a PITA to give the originals a different icon. Can't recall where it is though.
Deja Thoris	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:51:00 - [46] If you sort them per type (or name - cant recall) then the last one is the original. There was a dev response on why it's a PITA to give the originals a different icon. Can't recall where it is though.
Deja Thoris	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:51:00 - [47] If you sort them per type (or name - cant recall) then the last one is the original. There was a dev response on why it's a PITA to give the originals a different icon. Can't recall where it is though.
Deja Thoris	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:51:00 - [48] If you sort them per type (or name - cant recall) then the last one is the original. There was a dev response on why it's a PITA to give the originals a different icon. Can't recall where it is though.
Major Skillz	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:53:00 - [49] I store most stuff by class type in separate cans and just name the can what I like. That helps me.
Major Skillz	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:53:00 - [50] I store most stuff by class type in separate cans and just name the can what I like. That helps me.
Major Skillz	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:53:00 - [51] I store most stuff by class type in separate cans and just name the can what I like. That helps me.
Major Skillz	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:53:00 - [52] I store most stuff by class type in separate cans and just name the can what I like. That helps me.
Major Skillz	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:53:00 - [53] I store most stuff by class type in separate cans and just name the can what I like. That helps me.
Major Skillz	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:53:00 - [54] I store most stuff by class type in separate cans and just name the can what I like. That helps me.
Major Skillz	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:53:00 - [55] I store most stuff by class type in separate cans and just name the can what I like. That helps me.
Major Skillz	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:53:00 - [56] I store most stuff by class type in separate cans and just name the can what I like. That helps me.
Major Skillz	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:53:00 - [57] I store most stuff by class type in separate cans and just name the can what I like. That helps me.
Major Skillz	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:53:00 - [58] I store most stuff by class type in separate cans and just name the can what I like. That helps me.
Major Skillz	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:53:00 - [59] I store most stuff by class type in separate cans and just name the can what I like. That helps me.
Major Skillz	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:53:00 - [60] I store most stuff by class type in separate cans and just name the can what I like. That helps me.
Major Skillz	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:53:00 - [61] I store most stuff by class type in separate cans and just name the can what I like. That helps me.
Major Skillz	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:53:00 - [62] I store most stuff by class type in separate cans and just name the can what I like. That helps me.
Major Skillz	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:53:00 - [63] I store most stuff by class type in separate cans and just name the can what I like. That helps me.
Major Skillz	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:53:00 - [64] I store most stuff by class type in separate cans and just name the can what I like. That helps me.
Major Skillz	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:53:00 - [65] I store most stuff by class type in separate cans and just name the can what I like. That helps me.
Major Skillz	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:53:00 - [66] I store most stuff by class type in separate cans and just name the can what I like. That helps me.
Major Skillz	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:53:00 - [67] I store most stuff by class type in separate cans and just name the can what I like. That helps me.
Major Skillz	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:53:00 - [68] I store most stuff by class type in separate cans and just name the can what I like. That helps me.
Major Skillz	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:53:00 - [69] I store most stuff by class type in separate cans and just name the can what I like. That helps me.
Major Skillz	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:53:00 - [70] I store most stuff by class type in separate cans and just name the can what I like. That helps me.
Major Skillz	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:53:00 - [71] I store most stuff by class type in separate cans and just name the can what I like. That helps me.
Major Skillz	Posted - 2006.02.27 00:53:00 - [72] I store most stuff by class type in separate cans and just name the can what I like. That helps me.
Karl Mattar	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:12:00 - [73] I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. --- Karl Mattar LT-CMDR, CAIN --- My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of my corporation or the State. ---
Karl Mattar	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:12:00 - [74] I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. --- Karl Mattar LT-CMDR, CAIN --- My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of my corporation or the State. ---
Karl Mattar	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:12:00 - [75] I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. --- Karl Mattar LT-CMDR, CAIN --- My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of my corporation or the State. ---
Karl Mattar	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:12:00 - [76] I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. --- Karl Mattar LT-CMDR, CAIN --- My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of my corporation or the State. ---
Karl Mattar	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:12:00 - [77] I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. --- Karl Mattar LT-CMDR, CAIN --- My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of my corporation or the State. ---
Karl Mattar	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:12:00 - [78] I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. --- Karl Mattar LT-CMDR, CAIN --- My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of my corporation or the State. ---
Karl Mattar	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:12:00 - [79] I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. --- Karl Mattar LT-CMDR, CAIN --- My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of my corporation or the State. ---
Karl Mattar	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:12:00 - [80] I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. --- Karl Mattar LT-CMDR, CAIN --- My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of my corporation or the State. ---
Karl Mattar	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:12:00 - [81] I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. --- Karl Mattar LT-CMDR, CAIN --- My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of my corporation or the State. ---
Karl Mattar	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:12:00 - [82] I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. --- Karl Mattar LT-CMDR, CAIN --- My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of my corporation or the State. ---
Karl Mattar	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:12:00 - [83] I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. --- Karl Mattar LT-CMDR, CAIN --- My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of my corporation or the State. ---
Karl Mattar	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:12:00 - [84] I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. --- Karl Mattar LT-CMDR, CAIN --- My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of my corporation or the State. ---
Karl Mattar	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:12:00 - [85] I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. --- Karl Mattar LT-CMDR, CAIN --- My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of my corporation or the State. ---
Karl Mattar	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:12:00 - [86] I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. --- Karl Mattar LT-CMDR, CAIN --- My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of my corporation or the State. ---
Karl Mattar	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:12:00 - [87] I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. --- Karl Mattar LT-CMDR, CAIN --- My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of my corporation or the State. ---
Karl Mattar	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:12:00 - [88] I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. --- Karl Mattar LT-CMDR, CAIN --- My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of my corporation or the State. ---
Karl Mattar	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:12:00 - [89] I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. --- Karl Mattar LT-CMDR, CAIN --- My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of my corporation or the State. ---
Karl Mattar	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:12:00 - [90] I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. --- Karl Mattar LT-CMDR, CAIN --- My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of my corporation or the State. ---
Karl Mattar	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:12:00 - [91] I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. --- Karl Mattar LT-CMDR, CAIN --- My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of my corporation or the State. ---
Karl Mattar	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:12:00 - [92] I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. --- Karl Mattar LT-CMDR, CAIN --- My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of my corporation or the State. ---
Karl Mattar	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:12:00 - [93] I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. --- Karl Mattar LT-CMDR, CAIN --- My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of my corporation or the State. ---
Karl Mattar	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:12:00 - [94] I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. --- Karl Mattar LT-CMDR, CAIN --- My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of my corporation or the State. ---
Johnny Twoshoe	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:15:00 - [95] Originally by: Karl Mattar I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. They've said a dozen times that despite how much they want to do this, they simply can't. Ideas have been suggested by the player base but will not work for one reason or another. ~ We move in circles Balanced all the while On a gleaming razor's edge A perfect sphere Colliding with our fate This story ends where it began
Johnny Twoshoe	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:15:00 - [96] Originally by: Karl Mattar I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. They've said a dozen times that despite how much they want to do this, they simply can't. Ideas have been suggested by the player base but will not work for one reason or another. ~ We move in circles Balanced all the while On a gleaming razor's edge A perfect sphere Colliding with our fate This story ends where it began
Johnny Twoshoe	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:15:00 - [97] Originally by: Karl Mattar I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. They've said a dozen times that despite how much they want to do this, they simply can't. Ideas have been suggested by the player base but will not work for one reason or another. ~ We move in circles Balanced all the while On a gleaming razor's edge A perfect sphere Colliding with our fate This story ends where it began
Johnny Twoshoe	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:15:00 - [98] Originally by: Karl Mattar I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. They've said a dozen times that despite how much they want to do this, they simply can't. Ideas have been suggested by the player base but will not work for one reason or another. ~ We move in circles Balanced all the while On a gleaming razor's edge A perfect sphere Colliding with our fate This story ends where it began
Johnny Twoshoe	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:15:00 - [99] Originally by: Karl Mattar I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. They've said a dozen times that despite how much they want to do this, they simply can't. Ideas have been suggested by the player base but will not work for one reason or another. ~ We move in circles Balanced all the while On a gleaming razor's edge A perfect sphere Colliding with our fate This story ends where it began
Johnny Twoshoe	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:15:00 - [100] Originally by: Karl Mattar I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. They've said a dozen times that despite how much they want to do this, they simply can't. Ideas have been suggested by the player base but will not work for one reason or another. ~ We move in circles Balanced all the while On a gleaming razor's edge A perfect sphere Colliding with our fate This story ends where it began
Johnny Twoshoe	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:15:00 - [101] Originally by: Karl Mattar I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. They've said a dozen times that despite how much they want to do this, they simply can't. Ideas have been suggested by the player base but will not work for one reason or another. ~ We move in circles Balanced all the while On a gleaming razor's edge A perfect sphere Colliding with our fate This story ends where it began
Johnny Twoshoe	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:15:00 - [102] Originally by: Karl Mattar I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. They've said a dozen times that despite how much they want to do this, they simply can't. Ideas have been suggested by the player base but will not work for one reason or another. ~ We move in circles Balanced all the while On a gleaming razor's edge A perfect sphere Colliding with our fate This story ends where it began
Johnny Twoshoe	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:15:00 - [103] Originally by: Karl Mattar I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. They've said a dozen times that despite how much they want to do this, they simply can't. Ideas have been suggested by the player base but will not work for one reason or another. ~ We move in circles Balanced all the while On a gleaming razor's edge A perfect sphere Colliding with our fate This story ends where it began
Johnny Twoshoe	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:15:00 - [104] Originally by: Karl Mattar I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. They've said a dozen times that despite how much they want to do this, they simply can't. Ideas have been suggested by the player base but will not work for one reason or another. ~ We move in circles Balanced all the while On a gleaming razor's edge A perfect sphere Colliding with our fate This story ends where it began
Johnny Twoshoe	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:15:00 - [105] Originally by: Karl Mattar I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. They've said a dozen times that despite how much they want to do this, they simply can't. Ideas have been suggested by the player base but will not work for one reason or another. ~ We move in circles Balanced all the while On a gleaming razor's edge A perfect sphere Colliding with our fate This story ends where it began
Johnny Twoshoe	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:15:00 - [106] Originally by: Karl Mattar I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. They've said a dozen times that despite how much they want to do this, they simply can't. Ideas have been suggested by the player base but will not work for one reason or another. ~ We move in circles Balanced all the while On a gleaming razor's edge A perfect sphere Colliding with our fate This story ends where it began
Johnny Twoshoe	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:15:00 - [107] Originally by: Karl Mattar I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. They've said a dozen times that despite how much they want to do this, they simply can't. Ideas have been suggested by the player base but will not work for one reason or another. ~ We move in circles Balanced all the while On a gleaming razor's edge A perfect sphere Colliding with our fate This story ends where it began
Johnny Twoshoe	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:15:00 - [108] Originally by: Karl Mattar I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. They've said a dozen times that despite how much they want to do this, they simply can't. Ideas have been suggested by the player base but will not work for one reason or another. ~ We move in circles Balanced all the while On a gleaming razor's edge A perfect sphere Colliding with our fate This story ends where it began
Johnny Twoshoe	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:15:00 - [109] Originally by: Karl Mattar I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. They've said a dozen times that despite how much they want to do this, they simply can't. Ideas have been suggested by the player base but will not work for one reason or another. ~ We move in circles Balanced all the while On a gleaming razor's edge A perfect sphere Colliding with our fate This story ends where it began
Johnny Twoshoe	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:15:00 - [110] Originally by: Karl Mattar I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. They've said a dozen times that despite how much they want to do this, they simply can't. Ideas have been suggested by the player base but will not work for one reason or another. ~ We move in circles Balanced all the while On a gleaming razor's edge A perfect sphere Colliding with our fate This story ends where it began
Johnny Twoshoe	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:15:00 - [111] Originally by: Karl Mattar I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. They've said a dozen times that despite how much they want to do this, they simply can't. Ideas have been suggested by the player base but will not work for one reason or another. ~ We move in circles Balanced all the while On a gleaming razor's edge A perfect sphere Colliding with our fate This story ends where it began
Johnny Twoshoe	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:15:00 - [112] Originally by: Karl Mattar I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. They've said a dozen times that despite how much they want to do this, they simply can't. Ideas have been suggested by the player base but will not work for one reason or another. ~ We move in circles Balanced all the while On a gleaming razor's edge A perfect sphere Colliding with our fate This story ends where it began
Johnny Twoshoe	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:15:00 - [113] Originally by: Karl Mattar I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. They've said a dozen times that despite how much they want to do this, they simply can't. Ideas have been suggested by the player base but will not work for one reason or another. ~ We move in circles Balanced all the while On a gleaming razor's edge A perfect sphere Colliding with our fate This story ends where it began
Johnny Twoshoe	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:15:00 - [114] Originally by: Karl Mattar I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. They've said a dozen times that despite how much they want to do this, they simply can't. Ideas have been suggested by the player base but will not work for one reason or another. ~ We move in circles Balanced all the while On a gleaming razor's edge A perfect sphere Colliding with our fate This story ends where it began
Johnny Twoshoe	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:15:00 - [115] Originally by: Karl Mattar I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. They've said a dozen times that despite how much they want to do this, they simply can't. Ideas have been suggested by the player base but will not work for one reason or another. ~ We move in circles Balanced all the while On a gleaming razor's edge A perfect sphere Colliding with our fate This story ends where it began
Johnny Twoshoe	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:15:00 - [116] Originally by: Karl Mattar I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. They've said a dozen times that despite how much they want to do this, they simply can't. Ideas have been suggested by the player base but will not work for one reason or another. ~ We move in circles Balanced all the while On a gleaming razor's edge A perfect sphere Colliding with our fate This story ends where it began
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:17:00 - [117] the reason is that BPCs and BPOs are exactly the same - the only difference is their number of runs (i.e. bpos set to infinate, bpcs aren't). This kind of information isn't stored in the regular item list, and as such a full database query would be needed for each blueprint to determine how many runs it has left. Now imagine players with hundreds of BPCs opening up their assets. LAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAG Originally by: Zzazzt Originally by: thoth foc PA doesnt stand for anything.. Punchbag Alliance...
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:17:00 - [118] the reason is that BPCs and BPOs are exactly the same - the only difference is their number of runs (i.e. bpos set to infinate, bpcs aren't). This kind of information isn't stored in the regular item list, and as such a full database query would be needed for each blueprint to determine how many runs it has left. Now imagine players with hundreds of BPCs opening up their assets. LAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAG Originally by: Zzazzt Originally by: thoth foc PA doesnt stand for anything.. Punchbag Alliance...
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:17:00 - [119] the reason is that BPCs and BPOs are exactly the same - the only difference is their number of runs (i.e. bpos set to infinate, bpcs aren't). This kind of information isn't stored in the regular item list, and as such a full database query would be needed for each blueprint to determine how many runs it has left. Now imagine players with hundreds of BPCs opening up their assets. LAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAG Originally by: Zzazzt Originally by: thoth foc PA doesnt stand for anything.. Punchbag Alliance...
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:17:00 - [120] the reason is that BPCs and BPOs are exactly the same - the only difference is their number of runs (i.e. bpos set to infinate, bpcs aren't). This kind of information isn't stored in the regular item list, and as such a full database query would be needed for each blueprint to determine how many runs it has left. Now imagine players with hundreds of BPCs opening up their assets. LAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAG Originally by: Zzazzt Originally by: thoth foc PA doesnt stand for anything.. Punchbag Alliance...
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:17:00 - [121] the reason is that BPCs and BPOs are exactly the same - the only difference is their number of runs (i.e. bpos set to infinate, bpcs aren't). This kind of information isn't stored in the regular item list, and as such a full database query would be needed for each blueprint to determine how many runs it has left. Now imagine players with hundreds of BPCs opening up their assets. LAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAG Originally by: Zzazzt Originally by: thoth foc PA doesnt stand for anything.. Punchbag Alliance...
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:17:00 - [122] the reason is that BPCs and BPOs are exactly the same - the only difference is their number of runs (i.e. bpos set to infinate, bpcs aren't). This kind of information isn't stored in the regular item list, and as such a full database query would be needed for each blueprint to determine how many runs it has left. Now imagine players with hundreds of BPCs opening up their assets. LAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAG Originally by: Zzazzt Originally by: thoth foc PA doesnt stand for anything.. Punchbag Alliance...
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:17:00 - [123] the reason is that BPCs and BPOs are exactly the same - the only difference is their number of runs (i.e. bpos set to infinate, bpcs aren't). This kind of information isn't stored in the regular item list, and as such a full database query would be needed for each blueprint to determine how many runs it has left. Now imagine players with hundreds of BPCs opening up their assets. LAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAG Originally by: Zzazzt Originally by: thoth foc PA doesnt stand for anything.. Punchbag Alliance...
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:17:00 - [124] the reason is that BPCs and BPOs are exactly the same - the only difference is their number of runs (i.e. bpos set to infinate, bpcs aren't). This kind of information isn't stored in the regular item list, and as such a full database query would be needed for each blueprint to determine how many runs it has left. Now imagine players with hundreds of BPCs opening up their assets. LAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAG Originally by: Zzazzt Originally by: thoth foc PA doesnt stand for anything.. Punchbag Alliance...
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:17:00 - [125] the reason is that BPCs and BPOs are exactly the same - the only difference is their number of runs (i.e. bpos set to infinate, bpcs aren't). This kind of information isn't stored in the regular item list, and as such a full database query would be needed for each blueprint to determine how many runs it has left. Now imagine players with hundreds of BPCs opening up their assets. LAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAG Originally by: Zzazzt Originally by: thoth foc PA doesnt stand for anything.. Punchbag Alliance...
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:17:00 - [126] the reason is that BPCs and BPOs are exactly the same - the only difference is their number of runs (i.e. bpos set to infinate, bpcs aren't). This kind of information isn't stored in the regular item list, and as such a full database query would be needed for each blueprint to determine how many runs it has left. Now imagine players with hundreds of BPCs opening up their assets. LAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAG Originally by: Zzazzt Originally by: thoth foc PA doesnt stand for anything.. Punchbag Alliance...
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:17:00 - [127] the reason is that BPCs and BPOs are exactly the same - the only difference is their number of runs (i.e. bpos set to infinate, bpcs aren't). This kind of information isn't stored in the regular item list, and as such a full database query would be needed for each blueprint to determine how many runs it has left. Now imagine players with hundreds of BPCs opening up their assets. LAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAG Originally by: Zzazzt Originally by: thoth foc PA doesnt stand for anything.. Punchbag Alliance...
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:17:00 - [128] the reason is that BPCs and BPOs are exactly the same - the only difference is their number of runs (i.e. bpos set to infinate, bpcs aren't). This kind of information isn't stored in the regular item list, and as such a full database query would be needed for each blueprint to determine how many runs it has left. Now imagine players with hundreds of BPCs opening up their assets. LAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAG Originally by: Zzazzt Originally by: thoth foc PA doesnt stand for anything.. Punchbag Alliance...
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:17:00 - [129] the reason is that BPCs and BPOs are exactly the same - the only difference is their number of runs (i.e. bpos set to infinate, bpcs aren't). This kind of information isn't stored in the regular item list, and as such a full database query would be needed for each blueprint to determine how many runs it has left. Now imagine players with hundreds of BPCs opening up their assets. LAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAG Originally by: Zzazzt Originally by: thoth foc PA doesnt stand for anything.. Punchbag Alliance...
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:17:00 - [130] the reason is that BPCs and BPOs are exactly the same - the only difference is their number of runs (i.e. bpos set to infinate, bpcs aren't). This kind of information isn't stored in the regular item list, and as such a full database query would be needed for each blueprint to determine how many runs it has left. Now imagine players with hundreds of BPCs opening up their assets. LAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAG Originally by: Zzazzt Originally by: thoth foc PA doesnt stand for anything.. Punchbag Alliance...
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:17:00 - [131] the reason is that BPCs and BPOs are exactly the same - the only difference is their number of runs (i.e. bpos set to infinate, bpcs aren't). This kind of information isn't stored in the regular item list, and as such a full database query would be needed for each blueprint to determine how many runs it has left. Now imagine players with hundreds of BPCs opening up their assets. LAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAG Originally by: Zzazzt Originally by: thoth foc PA doesnt stand for anything.. Punchbag Alliance...
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:17:00 - [132] the reason is that BPCs and BPOs are exactly the same - the only difference is their number of runs (i.e. bpos set to infinate, bpcs aren't). This kind of information isn't stored in the regular item list, and as such a full database query would be needed for each blueprint to determine how many runs it has left. Now imagine players with hundreds of BPCs opening up their assets. LAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAG Originally by: Zzazzt Originally by: thoth foc PA doesnt stand for anything.. Punchbag Alliance...
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:17:00 - [133] the reason is that BPCs and BPOs are exactly the same - the only difference is their number of runs (i.e. bpos set to infinate, bpcs aren't). This kind of information isn't stored in the regular item list, and as such a full database query would be needed for each blueprint to determine how many runs it has left. Now imagine players with hundreds of BPCs opening up their assets. LAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAG Originally by: Zzazzt Originally by: thoth foc PA doesnt stand for anything.. Punchbag Alliance...
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:17:00 - [134] the reason is that BPCs and BPOs are exactly the same - the only difference is their number of runs (i.e. bpos set to infinate, bpcs aren't). This kind of information isn't stored in the regular item list, and as such a full database query would be needed for each blueprint to determine how many runs it has left. Now imagine players with hundreds of BPCs opening up their assets. LAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAG Originally by: Zzazzt Originally by: thoth foc PA doesnt stand for anything.. Punchbag Alliance...
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:17:00 - [135] the reason is that BPCs and BPOs are exactly the same - the only difference is their number of runs (i.e. bpos set to infinate, bpcs aren't). This kind of information isn't stored in the regular item list, and as such a full database query would be needed for each blueprint to determine how many runs it has left. Now imagine players with hundreds of BPCs opening up their assets. LAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAG Originally by: Zzazzt Originally by: thoth foc PA doesnt stand for anything.. Punchbag Alliance...
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:17:00 - [136] the reason is that BPCs and BPOs are exactly the same - the only difference is their number of runs (i.e. bpos set to infinate, bpcs aren't). This kind of information isn't stored in the regular item list, and as such a full database query would be needed for each blueprint to determine how many runs it has left. Now imagine players with hundreds of BPCs opening up their assets. LAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAG Originally by: Zzazzt Originally by: thoth foc PA doesnt stand for anything.. Punchbag Alliance...
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:17:00 - [137] the reason is that BPCs and BPOs are exactly the same - the only difference is their number of runs (i.e. bpos set to infinate, bpcs aren't). This kind of information isn't stored in the regular item list, and as such a full database query would be needed for each blueprint to determine how many runs it has left. Now imagine players with hundreds of BPCs opening up their assets. LAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAG Originally by: Zzazzt Originally by: thoth foc PA doesnt stand for anything.. Punchbag Alliance...
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:17:00 - [138] the reason is that BPCs and BPOs are exactly the same - the only difference is their number of runs (i.e. bpos set to infinate, bpcs aren't). This kind of information isn't stored in the regular item list, and as such a full database query would be needed for each blueprint to determine how many runs it has left. Now imagine players with hundreds of BPCs opening up their assets. LAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAG Originally by: Zzazzt Originally by: thoth foc PA doesnt stand for anything.. Punchbag Alliance...
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:24:00 - [139] Originally by: Johnny Twoshoe Originally by: Karl Mattar I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. They've said a dozen times that despite how much they want to do this, they simply can't. Ideas have been suggested by the player base but will not work for one reason or another. This is obviously not true, as before the factory revamp, you could open up your factory screen and see the runs left on every single one of your BPs, along with ME/PE, in a fraction of a second. This works even if you have over a thousand BPOs. Unless this caused "unnecessary server load", there's no reason it can't be done. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:24:00 - [140] Originally by: Johnny Twoshoe Originally by: Karl Mattar I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. They've said a dozen times that despite how much they want to do this, they simply can't. Ideas have been suggested by the player base but will not work for one reason or another. This is obviously not true, as before the factory revamp, you could open up your factory screen and see the runs left on every single one of your BPs, along with ME/PE, in a fraction of a second. This works even if you have over a thousand BPOs. Unless this caused "unnecessary server load", there's no reason it can't be done. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:24:00 - [141] Originally by: Johnny Twoshoe Originally by: Karl Mattar I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. They've said a dozen times that despite how much they want to do this, they simply can't. Ideas have been suggested by the player base but will not work for one reason or another. This is obviously not true, as before the factory revamp, you could open up your factory screen and see the runs left on every single one of your BPs, along with ME/PE, in a fraction of a second. This works even if you have over a thousand BPOs. Unless this caused "unnecessary server load", there's no reason it can't be done. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:24:00 - [142] Originally by: Johnny Twoshoe Originally by: Karl Mattar I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. They've said a dozen times that despite how much they want to do this, they simply can't. Ideas have been suggested by the player base but will not work for one reason or another. This is obviously not true, as before the factory revamp, you could open up your factory screen and see the runs left on every single one of your BPs, along with ME/PE, in a fraction of a second. This works even if you have over a thousand BPOs. Unless this caused "unnecessary server load", there's no reason it can't be done. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:24:00 - [143] Originally by: Johnny Twoshoe Originally by: Karl Mattar I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. They've said a dozen times that despite how much they want to do this, they simply can't. Ideas have been suggested by the player base but will not work for one reason or another. This is obviously not true, as before the factory revamp, you could open up your factory screen and see the runs left on every single one of your BPs, along with ME/PE, in a fraction of a second. This works even if you have over a thousand BPOs. Unless this caused "unnecessary server load", there's no reason it can't be done. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:24:00 - [144] Originally by: Johnny Twoshoe Originally by: Karl Mattar I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. They've said a dozen times that despite how much they want to do this, they simply can't. Ideas have been suggested by the player base but will not work for one reason or another. This is obviously not true, as before the factory revamp, you could open up your factory screen and see the runs left on every single one of your BPs, along with ME/PE, in a fraction of a second. This works even if you have over a thousand BPOs. Unless this caused "unnecessary server load", there's no reason it can't be done. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:24:00 - [145] Originally by: Johnny Twoshoe Originally by: Karl Mattar I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. They've said a dozen times that despite how much they want to do this, they simply can't. Ideas have been suggested by the player base but will not work for one reason or another. This is obviously not true, as before the factory revamp, you could open up your factory screen and see the runs left on every single one of your BPs, along with ME/PE, in a fraction of a second. This works even if you have over a thousand BPOs. Unless this caused "unnecessary server load", there's no reason it can't be done. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:24:00 - [146] Originally by: Johnny Twoshoe Originally by: Karl Mattar I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. They've said a dozen times that despite how much they want to do this, they simply can't. Ideas have been suggested by the player base but will not work for one reason or another. This is obviously not true, as before the factory revamp, you could open up your factory screen and see the runs left on every single one of your BPs, along with ME/PE, in a fraction of a second. This works even if you have over a thousand BPOs. Unless this caused "unnecessary server load", there's no reason it can't be done. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:24:00 - [147] Originally by: Johnny Twoshoe Originally by: Karl Mattar I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. They've said a dozen times that despite how much they want to do this, they simply can't. Ideas have been suggested by the player base but will not work for one reason or another. This is obviously not true, as before the factory revamp, you could open up your factory screen and see the runs left on every single one of your BPs, along with ME/PE, in a fraction of a second. This works even if you have over a thousand BPOs. Unless this caused "unnecessary server load", there's no reason it can't be done. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:24:00 - [148] Originally by: Johnny Twoshoe Originally by: Karl Mattar I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. They've said a dozen times that despite how much they want to do this, they simply can't. Ideas have been suggested by the player base but will not work for one reason or another. This is obviously not true, as before the factory revamp, you could open up your factory screen and see the runs left on every single one of your BPs, along with ME/PE, in a fraction of a second. This works even if you have over a thousand BPOs. Unless this caused "unnecessary server load", there's no reason it can't be done. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:24:00 - [149] Originally by: Johnny Twoshoe Originally by: Karl Mattar I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. They've said a dozen times that despite how much they want to do this, they simply can't. Ideas have been suggested by the player base but will not work for one reason or another. This is obviously not true, as before the factory revamp, you could open up your factory screen and see the runs left on every single one of your BPs, along with ME/PE, in a fraction of a second. This works even if you have over a thousand BPOs. Unless this caused "unnecessary server load", there's no reason it can't be done. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:24:00 - [150] Originally by: Johnny Twoshoe Originally by: Karl Mattar I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. They've said a dozen times that despite how much they want to do this, they simply can't. Ideas have been suggested by the player base but will not work for one reason or another. This is obviously not true, as before the factory revamp, you could open up your factory screen and see the runs left on every single one of your BPs, along with ME/PE, in a fraction of a second. This works even if you have over a thousand BPOs. Unless this caused "unnecessary server load", there's no reason it can't be done. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:24:00 - [151] Originally by: Johnny Twoshoe Originally by: Karl Mattar I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. They've said a dozen times that despite how much they want to do this, they simply can't. Ideas have been suggested by the player base but will not work for one reason or another. This is obviously not true, as before the factory revamp, you could open up your factory screen and see the runs left on every single one of your BPs, along with ME/PE, in a fraction of a second. This works even if you have over a thousand BPOs. Unless this caused "unnecessary server load", there's no reason it can't be done. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:24:00 - [152] Originally by: Johnny Twoshoe Originally by: Karl Mattar I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. They've said a dozen times that despite how much they want to do this, they simply can't. Ideas have been suggested by the player base but will not work for one reason or another. This is obviously not true, as before the factory revamp, you could open up your factory screen and see the runs left on every single one of your BPs, along with ME/PE, in a fraction of a second. This works even if you have over a thousand BPOs. Unless this caused "unnecessary server load", there's no reason it can't be done. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:24:00 - [153] Originally by: Johnny Twoshoe Originally by: Karl Mattar I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. They've said a dozen times that despite how much they want to do this, they simply can't. Ideas have been suggested by the player base but will not work for one reason or another. This is obviously not true, as before the factory revamp, you could open up your factory screen and see the runs left on every single one of your BPs, along with ME/PE, in a fraction of a second. This works even if you have over a thousand BPOs. Unless this caused "unnecessary server load", there's no reason it can't be done. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:24:00 - [154] Originally by: Johnny Twoshoe Originally by: Karl Mattar I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. They've said a dozen times that despite how much they want to do this, they simply can't. Ideas have been suggested by the player base but will not work for one reason or another. This is obviously not true, as before the factory revamp, you could open up your factory screen and see the runs left on every single one of your BPs, along with ME/PE, in a fraction of a second. This works even if you have over a thousand BPOs. Unless this caused "unnecessary server load", there's no reason it can't be done. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:24:00 - [155] Originally by: Johnny Twoshoe Originally by: Karl Mattar I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. They've said a dozen times that despite how much they want to do this, they simply can't. Ideas have been suggested by the player base but will not work for one reason or another. This is obviously not true, as before the factory revamp, you could open up your factory screen and see the runs left on every single one of your BPs, along with ME/PE, in a fraction of a second. This works even if you have over a thousand BPOs. Unless this caused "unnecessary server load", there's no reason it can't be done. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:24:00 - [156] Originally by: Johnny Twoshoe Originally by: Karl Mattar I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. They've said a dozen times that despite how much they want to do this, they simply can't. Ideas have been suggested by the player base but will not work for one reason or another. This is obviously not true, as before the factory revamp, you could open up your factory screen and see the runs left on every single one of your BPs, along with ME/PE, in a fraction of a second. This works even if you have over a thousand BPOs. Unless this caused "unnecessary server load", there's no reason it can't be done. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:24:00 - [157] Originally by: Johnny Twoshoe Originally by: Karl Mattar I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. They've said a dozen times that despite how much they want to do this, they simply can't. Ideas have been suggested by the player base but will not work for one reason or another. This is obviously not true, as before the factory revamp, you could open up your factory screen and see the runs left on every single one of your BPs, along with ME/PE, in a fraction of a second. This works even if you have over a thousand BPOs. Unless this caused "unnecessary server load", there's no reason it can't be done. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:24:00 - [158] Originally by: Johnny Twoshoe Originally by: Karl Mattar I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. They've said a dozen times that despite how much they want to do this, they simply can't. Ideas have been suggested by the player base but will not work for one reason or another. This is obviously not true, as before the factory revamp, you could open up your factory screen and see the runs left on every single one of your BPs, along with ME/PE, in a fraction of a second. This works even if you have over a thousand BPOs. Unless this caused "unnecessary server load", there's no reason it can't be done. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:24:00 - [159] Originally by: Johnny Twoshoe Originally by: Karl Mattar I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. They've said a dozen times that despite how much they want to do this, they simply can't. Ideas have been suggested by the player base but will not work for one reason or another. This is obviously not true, as before the factory revamp, you could open up your factory screen and see the runs left on every single one of your BPs, along with ME/PE, in a fraction of a second. This works even if you have over a thousand BPOs. Unless this caused "unnecessary server load", there's no reason it can't be done. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Bawldeux IV	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:31:00 - [160] seems easy. bpc has limited runs or another atribute that makes it different then a bpo, so just use that as a flag, and bpo gets original graphic, bpc gets a different graphic, simple, has only to use the exisiting db fields, and can be client side, simple huh... -------------------------------------------------- Please resize image to a maximum of 400 x 120, not exceeding 24000 kbs, ty - Cortes
Bawldeux IV	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:31:00 - [161] seems easy. bpc has limited runs or another atribute that makes it different then a bpo, so just use that as a flag, and bpo gets original graphic, bpc gets a different graphic, simple, has only to use the exisiting db fields, and can be client side, simple huh... -------------------------------------------------- Please resize image to a maximum of 400 x 120, not exceeding 24000 kbs, ty - Cortes
Bawldeux IV	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:31:00 - [162] seems easy. bpc has limited runs or another atribute that makes it different then a bpo, so just use that as a flag, and bpo gets original graphic, bpc gets a different graphic, simple, has only to use the exisiting db fields, and can be client side, simple huh... -------------------------------------------------- Please resize image to a maximum of 400 x 120, not exceeding 24000 kbs, ty - Cortes
Bawldeux IV	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:31:00 - [163] seems easy. bpc has limited runs or another atribute that makes it different then a bpo, so just use that as a flag, and bpo gets original graphic, bpc gets a different graphic, simple, has only to use the exisiting db fields, and can be client side, simple huh... -------------------------------------------------- Please resize image to a maximum of 400 x 120, not exceeding 24000 kbs, ty - Cortes
Bawldeux IV	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:31:00 - [164] seems easy. bpc has limited runs or another atribute that makes it different then a bpo, so just use that as a flag, and bpo gets original graphic, bpc gets a different graphic, simple, has only to use the exisiting db fields, and can be client side, simple huh... -------------------------------------------------- Please resize image to a maximum of 400 x 120, not exceeding 24000 kbs, ty - Cortes
Bawldeux IV	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:31:00 - [165] seems easy. bpc has limited runs or another atribute that makes it different then a bpo, so just use that as a flag, and bpo gets original graphic, bpc gets a different graphic, simple, has only to use the exisiting db fields, and can be client side, simple huh... -------------------------------------------------- Please resize image to a maximum of 400 x 120, not exceeding 24000 kbs, ty - Cortes
Bawldeux IV	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:31:00 - [166] seems easy. bpc has limited runs or another atribute that makes it different then a bpo, so just use that as a flag, and bpo gets original graphic, bpc gets a different graphic, simple, has only to use the exisiting db fields, and can be client side, simple huh... -------------------------------------------------- Please resize image to a maximum of 400 x 120, not exceeding 24000 kbs, ty - Cortes
Bawldeux IV	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:31:00 - [167] seems easy. bpc has limited runs or another atribute that makes it different then a bpo, so just use that as a flag, and bpo gets original graphic, bpc gets a different graphic, simple, has only to use the exisiting db fields, and can be client side, simple huh... -------------------------------------------------- Please resize image to a maximum of 400 x 120, not exceeding 24000 kbs, ty - Cortes
Bawldeux IV	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:31:00 - [168] seems easy. bpc has limited runs or another atribute that makes it different then a bpo, so just use that as a flag, and bpo gets original graphic, bpc gets a different graphic, simple, has only to use the exisiting db fields, and can be client side, simple huh... -------------------------------------------------- Please resize image to a maximum of 400 x 120, not exceeding 24000 kbs, ty - Cortes
Bawldeux IV	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:31:00 - [169] seems easy. bpc has limited runs or another atribute that makes it different then a bpo, so just use that as a flag, and bpo gets original graphic, bpc gets a different graphic, simple, has only to use the exisiting db fields, and can be client side, simple huh... -------------------------------------------------- Please resize image to a maximum of 400 x 120, not exceeding 24000 kbs, ty - Cortes
Bawldeux IV	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:31:00 - [170] seems easy. bpc has limited runs or another atribute that makes it different then a bpo, so just use that as a flag, and bpo gets original graphic, bpc gets a different graphic, simple, has only to use the exisiting db fields, and can be client side, simple huh... -------------------------------------------------- Please resize image to a maximum of 400 x 120, not exceeding 24000 kbs, ty - Cortes
Bawldeux IV	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:31:00 - [171] seems easy. bpc has limited runs or another atribute that makes it different then a bpo, so just use that as a flag, and bpo gets original graphic, bpc gets a different graphic, simple, has only to use the exisiting db fields, and can be client side, simple huh... -------------------------------------------------- Please resize image to a maximum of 400 x 120, not exceeding 24000 kbs, ty - Cortes
Bawldeux IV	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:31:00 - [172] seems easy. bpc has limited runs or another atribute that makes it different then a bpo, so just use that as a flag, and bpo gets original graphic, bpc gets a different graphic, simple, has only to use the exisiting db fields, and can be client side, simple huh... -------------------------------------------------- Please resize image to a maximum of 400 x 120, not exceeding 24000 kbs, ty - Cortes
Bawldeux IV	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:31:00 - [173] seems easy. bpc has limited runs or another atribute that makes it different then a bpo, so just use that as a flag, and bpo gets original graphic, bpc gets a different graphic, simple, has only to use the exisiting db fields, and can be client side, simple huh... -------------------------------------------------- Please resize image to a maximum of 400 x 120, not exceeding 24000 kbs, ty - Cortes
Bawldeux IV	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:31:00 - [174] seems easy. bpc has limited runs or another atribute that makes it different then a bpo, so just use that as a flag, and bpo gets original graphic, bpc gets a different graphic, simple, has only to use the exisiting db fields, and can be client side, simple huh... -------------------------------------------------- Please resize image to a maximum of 400 x 120, not exceeding 24000 kbs, ty - Cortes
Bawldeux IV	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:31:00 - [175] seems easy. bpc has limited runs or another atribute that makes it different then a bpo, so just use that as a flag, and bpo gets original graphic, bpc gets a different graphic, simple, has only to use the exisiting db fields, and can be client side, simple huh... -------------------------------------------------- Please resize image to a maximum of 400 x 120, not exceeding 24000 kbs, ty - Cortes
Bawldeux IV	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:31:00 - [176] seems easy. bpc has limited runs or another atribute that makes it different then a bpo, so just use that as a flag, and bpo gets original graphic, bpc gets a different graphic, simple, has only to use the exisiting db fields, and can be client side, simple huh... -------------------------------------------------- Please resize image to a maximum of 400 x 120, not exceeding 24000 kbs, ty - Cortes
Bawldeux IV	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:31:00 - [177] seems easy. bpc has limited runs or another atribute that makes it different then a bpo, so just use that as a flag, and bpo gets original graphic, bpc gets a different graphic, simple, has only to use the exisiting db fields, and can be client side, simple huh... -------------------------------------------------- Please resize image to a maximum of 400 x 120, not exceeding 24000 kbs, ty - Cortes
Bawldeux IV	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:31:00 - [178] seems easy. bpc has limited runs or another atribute that makes it different then a bpo, so just use that as a flag, and bpo gets original graphic, bpc gets a different graphic, simple, has only to use the exisiting db fields, and can be client side, simple huh... -------------------------------------------------- Please resize image to a maximum of 400 x 120, not exceeding 24000 kbs, ty - Cortes
Bawldeux IV	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:31:00 - [179] seems easy. bpc has limited runs or another atribute that makes it different then a bpo, so just use that as a flag, and bpo gets original graphic, bpc gets a different graphic, simple, has only to use the exisiting db fields, and can be client side, simple huh... -------------------------------------------------- Please resize image to a maximum of 400 x 120, not exceeding 24000 kbs, ty - Cortes
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:33:00 - [180] Originally by: Bawldeux IV seems easy. bpc has limited runs or another atribute that makes it different then a bpo, so just use that as a flag, and bpo gets original graphic, bpc gets a different graphic, simple, has only to use the exisiting db fields, and can be client side, simple huh... The claim was that in order to do that the client would have to request all the database entries for the BPO, not just the header. However, as stated before, this claim is BS as this exact thing has been done for ages in the factory system just fine. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:33:00 - [181] Originally by: Bawldeux IV seems easy. bpc has limited runs or another atribute that makes it different then a bpo, so just use that as a flag, and bpo gets original graphic, bpc gets a different graphic, simple, has only to use the exisiting db fields, and can be client side, simple huh... The claim was that in order to do that the client would have to request all the database entries for the BPO, not just the header. However, as stated before, this claim is BS as this exact thing has been done for ages in the factory system just fine. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:33:00 - [182] Originally by: Bawldeux IV seems easy. bpc has limited runs or another atribute that makes it different then a bpo, so just use that as a flag, and bpo gets original graphic, bpc gets a different graphic, simple, has only to use the exisiting db fields, and can be client side, simple huh... The claim was that in order to do that the client would have to request all the database entries for the BPO, not just the header. However, as stated before, this claim is BS as this exact thing has been done for ages in the factory system just fine. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:33:00 - [183] Originally by: Bawldeux IV seems easy. bpc has limited runs or another atribute that makes it different then a bpo, so just use that as a flag, and bpo gets original graphic, bpc gets a different graphic, simple, has only to use the exisiting db fields, and can be client side, simple huh... The claim was that in order to do that the client would have to request all the database entries for the BPO, not just the header. However, as stated before, this claim is BS as this exact thing has been done for ages in the factory system just fine. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:33:00 - [184] Originally by: Bawldeux IV seems easy. bpc has limited runs or another atribute that makes it different then a bpo, so just use that as a flag, and bpo gets original graphic, bpc gets a different graphic, simple, has only to use the exisiting db fields, and can be client side, simple huh... The claim was that in order to do that the client would have to request all the database entries for the BPO, not just the header. However, as stated before, this claim is BS as this exact thing has been done for ages in the factory system just fine. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:33:00 - [185] Originally by: Bawldeux IV seems easy. bpc has limited runs or another atribute that makes it different then a bpo, so just use that as a flag, and bpo gets original graphic, bpc gets a different graphic, simple, has only to use the exisiting db fields, and can be client side, simple huh... The claim was that in order to do that the client would have to request all the database entries for the BPO, not just the header. However, as stated before, this claim is BS as this exact thing has been done for ages in the factory system just fine. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:33:00 - [186] Originally by: Bawldeux IV seems easy. bpc has limited runs or another atribute that makes it different then a bpo, so just use that as a flag, and bpo gets original graphic, bpc gets a different graphic, simple, has only to use the exisiting db fields, and can be client side, simple huh... The claim was that in order to do that the client would have to request all the database entries for the BPO, not just the header. However, as stated before, this claim is BS as this exact thing has been done for ages in the factory system just fine. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:33:00 - [187] Originally by: Bawldeux IV seems easy. bpc has limited runs or another atribute that makes it different then a bpo, so just use that as a flag, and bpo gets original graphic, bpc gets a different graphic, simple, has only to use the exisiting db fields, and can be client side, simple huh... The claim was that in order to do that the client would have to request all the database entries for the BPO, not just the header. However, as stated before, this claim is BS as this exact thing has been done for ages in the factory system just fine. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:33:00 - [188] Originally by: Bawldeux IV seems easy. bpc has limited runs or another atribute that makes it different then a bpo, so just use that as a flag, and bpo gets original graphic, bpc gets a different graphic, simple, has only to use the exisiting db fields, and can be client side, simple huh... The claim was that in order to do that the client would have to request all the database entries for the BPO, not just the header. However, as stated before, this claim is BS as this exact thing has been done for ages in the factory system just fine. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:33:00 - [189] Originally by: Bawldeux IV seems easy. bpc has limited runs or another atribute that makes it different then a bpo, so just use that as a flag, and bpo gets original graphic, bpc gets a different graphic, simple, has only to use the exisiting db fields, and can be client side, simple huh... The claim was that in order to do that the client would have to request all the database entries for the BPO, not just the header. However, as stated before, this claim is BS as this exact thing has been done for ages in the factory system just fine. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:33:00 - [190] Originally by: Bawldeux IV seems easy. bpc has limited runs or another atribute that makes it different then a bpo, so just use that as a flag, and bpo gets original graphic, bpc gets a different graphic, simple, has only to use the exisiting db fields, and can be client side, simple huh... The claim was that in order to do that the client would have to request all the database entries for the BPO, not just the header. However, as stated before, this claim is BS as this exact thing has been done for ages in the factory system just fine. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:33:00 - [191] Originally by: Bawldeux IV seems easy. bpc has limited runs or another atribute that makes it different then a bpo, so just use that as a flag, and bpo gets original graphic, bpc gets a different graphic, simple, has only to use the exisiting db fields, and can be client side, simple huh... The claim was that in order to do that the client would have to request all the database entries for the BPO, not just the header. However, as stated before, this claim is BS as this exact thing has been done for ages in the factory system just fine. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:33:00 - [192] Originally by: Bawldeux IV seems easy. bpc has limited runs or another atribute that makes it different then a bpo, so just use that as a flag, and bpo gets original graphic, bpc gets a different graphic, simple, has only to use the exisiting db fields, and can be client side, simple huh... The claim was that in order to do that the client would have to request all the database entries for the BPO, not just the header. However, as stated before, this claim is BS as this exact thing has been done for ages in the factory system just fine. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:33:00 - [193] Originally by: Bawldeux IV seems easy. bpc has limited runs or another atribute that makes it different then a bpo, so just use that as a flag, and bpo gets original graphic, bpc gets a different graphic, simple, has only to use the exisiting db fields, and can be client side, simple huh... The claim was that in order to do that the client would have to request all the database entries for the BPO, not just the header. However, as stated before, this claim is BS as this exact thing has been done for ages in the factory system just fine. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:33:00 - [194] Originally by: Bawldeux IV seems easy. bpc has limited runs or another atribute that makes it different then a bpo, so just use that as a flag, and bpo gets original graphic, bpc gets a different graphic, simple, has only to use the exisiting db fields, and can be client side, simple huh... The claim was that in order to do that the client would have to request all the database entries for the BPO, not just the header. However, as stated before, this claim is BS as this exact thing has been done for ages in the factory system just fine. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:33:00 - [195] Originally by: Bawldeux IV seems easy. bpc has limited runs or another atribute that makes it different then a bpo, so just use that as a flag, and bpo gets original graphic, bpc gets a different graphic, simple, has only to use the exisiting db fields, and can be client side, simple huh... The claim was that in order to do that the client would have to request all the database entries for the BPO, not just the header. However, as stated before, this claim is BS as this exact thing has been done for ages in the factory system just fine. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:33:00 - [196] Originally by: Bawldeux IV seems easy. bpc has limited runs or another atribute that makes it different then a bpo, so just use that as a flag, and bpo gets original graphic, bpc gets a different graphic, simple, has only to use the exisiting db fields, and can be client side, simple huh... The claim was that in order to do that the client would have to request all the database entries for the BPO, not just the header. However, as stated before, this claim is BS as this exact thing has been done for ages in the factory system just fine. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:33:00 - [197] Originally by: Bawldeux IV seems easy. bpc has limited runs or another atribute that makes it different then a bpo, so just use that as a flag, and bpo gets original graphic, bpc gets a different graphic, simple, has only to use the exisiting db fields, and can be client side, simple huh... The claim was that in order to do that the client would have to request all the database entries for the BPO, not just the header. However, as stated before, this claim is BS as this exact thing has been done for ages in the factory system just fine. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:33:00 - [198] Originally by: Bawldeux IV seems easy. bpc has limited runs or another atribute that makes it different then a bpo, so just use that as a flag, and bpo gets original graphic, bpc gets a different graphic, simple, has only to use the exisiting db fields, and can be client side, simple huh... The claim was that in order to do that the client would have to request all the database entries for the BPO, not just the header. However, as stated before, this claim is BS as this exact thing has been done for ages in the factory system just fine. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:33:00 - [199] Originally by: Bawldeux IV seems easy. bpc has limited runs or another atribute that makes it different then a bpo, so just use that as a flag, and bpo gets original graphic, bpc gets a different graphic, simple, has only to use the exisiting db fields, and can be client side, simple huh... The claim was that in order to do that the client would have to request all the database entries for the BPO, not just the header. However, as stated before, this claim is BS as this exact thing has been done for ages in the factory system just fine. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Gamer4liff	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:36:00 - [200] I think the DEVs must be pretty busy with kali and all, but this would definatly be a much needed addition.
Gamer4liff	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:36:00 - [201] I think the DEVs must be pretty busy with kali and all, but this would definatly be a much needed addition.
Gamer4liff	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:36:00 - [202] I think the DEVs must be pretty busy with kali and all, but this would definatly be a much needed addition.
Gamer4liff	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:36:00 - [203] I think the DEVs must be pretty busy with kali and all, but this would definatly be a much needed addition.
Gamer4liff	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:36:00 - [204] I think the DEVs must be pretty busy with kali and all, but this would definatly be a much needed addition.
Gamer4liff	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:36:00 - [205] I think the DEVs must be pretty busy with kali and all, but this would definatly be a much needed addition.
Gamer4liff	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:36:00 - [206] I think the DEVs must be pretty busy with kali and all, but this would definatly be a much needed addition.
Gamer4liff	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:36:00 - [207] I think the DEVs must be pretty busy with kali and all, but this would definatly be a much needed addition.
Gamer4liff	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:36:00 - [208] I think the DEVs must be pretty busy with kali and all, but this would definatly be a much needed addition.
Gamer4liff	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:36:00 - [209] I think the DEVs must be pretty busy with kali and all, but this would definatly be a much needed addition.
Gamer4liff	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:36:00 - [210] I think the DEVs must be pretty busy with kali and all, but this would definatly be a much needed addition.
Gamer4liff	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:36:00 - [211] I think the DEVs must be pretty busy with kali and all, but this would definatly be a much needed addition.
Gamer4liff	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:36:00 - [212] I think the DEVs must be pretty busy with kali and all, but this would definatly be a much needed addition.
Gamer4liff	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:36:00 - [213] I think the DEVs must be pretty busy with kali and all, but this would definatly be a much needed addition.
Gamer4liff	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:36:00 - [214] I think the DEVs must be pretty busy with kali and all, but this would definatly be a much needed addition.
Gamer4liff	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:36:00 - [215] I think the DEVs must be pretty busy with kali and all, but this would definatly be a much needed addition.
Gamer4liff	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:36:00 - [216] I think the DEVs must be pretty busy with kali and all, but this would definatly be a much needed addition.
Gamer4liff	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:36:00 - [217] I think the DEVs must be pretty busy with kali and all, but this would definatly be a much needed addition.
Gamer4liff	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:36:00 - [218] I think the DEVs must be pretty busy with kali and all, but this would definatly be a much needed addition.
Gamer4liff	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:36:00 - [219] I think the DEVs must be pretty busy with kali and all, but this would definatly be a much needed addition.
Drizit	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:44:00 - [220] It only needs the icon to be manipulated in PSP with one of those plugins to curl the edge of the page. It would take about 20 seconds. Not sure about the coding though, It may be that both BPO's and BPC's are linked to the same icon. I think the BPO should be curled, it's the one that's been used most often to make copies so it stands to reason it's going to get curled up. -- My idea of an OS is one that Operates the System, not a complete package of every piece of software ever written. Computers created "The Paperless Office". But some stupid fool invented a printer
Drizit	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:44:00 - [221] It only needs the icon to be manipulated in PSP with one of those plugins to curl the edge of the page. It would take about 20 seconds. Not sure about the coding though, It may be that both BPO's and BPC's are linked to the same icon. I think the BPO should be curled, it's the one that's been used most often to make copies so it stands to reason it's going to get curled up. -- My idea of an OS is one that Operates the System, not a complete package of every piece of software ever written. Computers created "The Paperless Office". But some stupid fool invented a printer
Drizit	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:44:00 - [222] It only needs the icon to be manipulated in PSP with one of those plugins to curl the edge of the page. It would take about 20 seconds. Not sure about the coding though, It may be that both BPO's and BPC's are linked to the same icon. I think the BPO should be curled, it's the one that's been used most often to make copies so it stands to reason it's going to get curled up. -- My idea of an OS is one that Operates the System, not a complete package of every piece of software ever written. Computers created "The Paperless Office". But some stupid fool invented a printer
Drizit	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:44:00 - [223] It only needs the icon to be manipulated in PSP with one of those plugins to curl the edge of the page. It would take about 20 seconds. Not sure about the coding though, It may be that both BPO's and BPC's are linked to the same icon. I think the BPO should be curled, it's the one that's been used most often to make copies so it stands to reason it's going to get curled up. -- My idea of an OS is one that Operates the System, not a complete package of every piece of software ever written. Computers created "The Paperless Office". But some stupid fool invented a printer
Drizit	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:44:00 - [224] It only needs the icon to be manipulated in PSP with one of those plugins to curl the edge of the page. It would take about 20 seconds. Not sure about the coding though, It may be that both BPO's and BPC's are linked to the same icon. I think the BPO should be curled, it's the one that's been used most often to make copies so it stands to reason it's going to get curled up. -- My idea of an OS is one that Operates the System, not a complete package of every piece of software ever written. Computers created "The Paperless Office". But some stupid fool invented a printer
Drizit	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:44:00 - [225] It only needs the icon to be manipulated in PSP with one of those plugins to curl the edge of the page. It would take about 20 seconds. Not sure about the coding though, It may be that both BPO's and BPC's are linked to the same icon. I think the BPO should be curled, it's the one that's been used most often to make copies so it stands to reason it's going to get curled up. -- My idea of an OS is one that Operates the System, not a complete package of every piece of software ever written. Computers created "The Paperless Office". But some stupid fool invented a printer
Drizit	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:44:00 - [226] It only needs the icon to be manipulated in PSP with one of those plugins to curl the edge of the page. It would take about 20 seconds. Not sure about the coding though, It may be that both BPO's and BPC's are linked to the same icon. I think the BPO should be curled, it's the one that's been used most often to make copies so it stands to reason it's going to get curled up. -- My idea of an OS is one that Operates the System, not a complete package of every piece of software ever written. Computers created "The Paperless Office". But some stupid fool invented a printer
Drizit	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:44:00 - [227] It only needs the icon to be manipulated in PSP with one of those plugins to curl the edge of the page. It would take about 20 seconds. Not sure about the coding though, It may be that both BPO's and BPC's are linked to the same icon. I think the BPO should be curled, it's the one that's been used most often to make copies so it stands to reason it's going to get curled up. -- My idea of an OS is one that Operates the System, not a complete package of every piece of software ever written. Computers created "The Paperless Office". But some stupid fool invented a printer
Drizit	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:44:00 - [228] It only needs the icon to be manipulated in PSP with one of those plugins to curl the edge of the page. It would take about 20 seconds. Not sure about the coding though, It may be that both BPO's and BPC's are linked to the same icon. I think the BPO should be curled, it's the one that's been used most often to make copies so it stands to reason it's going to get curled up. -- My idea of an OS is one that Operates the System, not a complete package of every piece of software ever written. Computers created "The Paperless Office". But some stupid fool invented a printer
Drizit	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:44:00 - [229] It only needs the icon to be manipulated in PSP with one of those plugins to curl the edge of the page. It would take about 20 seconds. Not sure about the coding though, It may be that both BPO's and BPC's are linked to the same icon. I think the BPO should be curled, it's the one that's been used most often to make copies so it stands to reason it's going to get curled up. -- My idea of an OS is one that Operates the System, not a complete package of every piece of software ever written. Computers created "The Paperless Office". But some stupid fool invented a printer
Drizit	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:44:00 - [230] It only needs the icon to be manipulated in PSP with one of those plugins to curl the edge of the page. It would take about 20 seconds. Not sure about the coding though, It may be that both BPO's and BPC's are linked to the same icon. I think the BPO should be curled, it's the one that's been used most often to make copies so it stands to reason it's going to get curled up. -- My idea of an OS is one that Operates the System, not a complete package of every piece of software ever written. Computers created "The Paperless Office". But some stupid fool invented a printer
Drizit	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:44:00 - [231] It only needs the icon to be manipulated in PSP with one of those plugins to curl the edge of the page. It would take about 20 seconds. Not sure about the coding though, It may be that both BPO's and BPC's are linked to the same icon. I think the BPO should be curled, it's the one that's been used most often to make copies so it stands to reason it's going to get curled up. -- My idea of an OS is one that Operates the System, not a complete package of every piece of software ever written. Computers created "The Paperless Office". But some stupid fool invented a printer
Drizit	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:44:00 - [232] It only needs the icon to be manipulated in PSP with one of those plugins to curl the edge of the page. It would take about 20 seconds. Not sure about the coding though, It may be that both BPO's and BPC's are linked to the same icon. I think the BPO should be curled, it's the one that's been used most often to make copies so it stands to reason it's going to get curled up. -- My idea of an OS is one that Operates the System, not a complete package of every piece of software ever written. Computers created "The Paperless Office". But some stupid fool invented a printer
Drizit	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:44:00 - [233] It only needs the icon to be manipulated in PSP with one of those plugins to curl the edge of the page. It would take about 20 seconds. Not sure about the coding though, It may be that both BPO's and BPC's are linked to the same icon. I think the BPO should be curled, it's the one that's been used most often to make copies so it stands to reason it's going to get curled up. -- My idea of an OS is one that Operates the System, not a complete package of every piece of software ever written. Computers created "The Paperless Office". But some stupid fool invented a printer
Drizit	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:44:00 - [234] It only needs the icon to be manipulated in PSP with one of those plugins to curl the edge of the page. It would take about 20 seconds. Not sure about the coding though, It may be that both BPO's and BPC's are linked to the same icon. I think the BPO should be curled, it's the one that's been used most often to make copies so it stands to reason it's going to get curled up. -- My idea of an OS is one that Operates the System, not a complete package of every piece of software ever written. Computers created "The Paperless Office". But some stupid fool invented a printer
Drizit	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:44:00 - [235] It only needs the icon to be manipulated in PSP with one of those plugins to curl the edge of the page. It would take about 20 seconds. Not sure about the coding though, It may be that both BPO's and BPC's are linked to the same icon. I think the BPO should be curled, it's the one that's been used most often to make copies so it stands to reason it's going to get curled up. -- My idea of an OS is one that Operates the System, not a complete package of every piece of software ever written. Computers created "The Paperless Office". But some stupid fool invented a printer
Drizit	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:44:00 - [236] It only needs the icon to be manipulated in PSP with one of those plugins to curl the edge of the page. It would take about 20 seconds. Not sure about the coding though, It may be that both BPO's and BPC's are linked to the same icon. I think the BPO should be curled, it's the one that's been used most often to make copies so it stands to reason it's going to get curled up. -- My idea of an OS is one that Operates the System, not a complete package of every piece of software ever written. Computers created "The Paperless Office". But some stupid fool invented a printer
Drizit	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:44:00 - [237] It only needs the icon to be manipulated in PSP with one of those plugins to curl the edge of the page. It would take about 20 seconds. Not sure about the coding though, It may be that both BPO's and BPC's are linked to the same icon. I think the BPO should be curled, it's the one that's been used most often to make copies so it stands to reason it's going to get curled up. -- My idea of an OS is one that Operates the System, not a complete package of every piece of software ever written. Computers created "The Paperless Office". But some stupid fool invented a printer
Drizit	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:44:00 - [238] It only needs the icon to be manipulated in PSP with one of those plugins to curl the edge of the page. It would take about 20 seconds. Not sure about the coding though, It may be that both BPO's and BPC's are linked to the same icon. I think the BPO should be curled, it's the one that's been used most often to make copies so it stands to reason it's going to get curled up. -- My idea of an OS is one that Operates the System, not a complete package of every piece of software ever written. Computers created "The Paperless Office". But some stupid fool invented a printer
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:46:00 - [239] Originally by: Drizit It only needs the icon to be manipulated in PSP with one of those plugins to curl the edge of the page. It would take about 20 seconds. Not sure about the coding though, It may be that both BPO's and BPC's are linked to the same icon. I think the BPO should be curled, it's the one that's been used most often to make copies so it stands to reason it's going to get curled up. Correct--as they are both linked to the same icon, you would have to run a script to curl every single icon and then put a client-side script to change the icons if the blueprints are BPOs. A decent amount of work, but not unreasonable. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:46:00 - [240] Originally by: Drizit It only needs the icon to be manipulated in PSP with one of those plugins to curl the edge of the page. It would take about 20 seconds. Not sure about the coding though, It may be that both BPO's and BPC's are linked to the same icon. I think the BPO should be curled, it's the one that's been used most often to make copies so it stands to reason it's going to get curled up. Correct--as they are both linked to the same icon, you would have to run a script to curl every single icon and then put a client-side script to change the icons if the blueprints are BPOs. A decent amount of work, but not unreasonable. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:46:00 - [241] Originally by: Drizit It only needs the icon to be manipulated in PSP with one of those plugins to curl the edge of the page. It would take about 20 seconds. Not sure about the coding though, It may be that both BPO's and BPC's are linked to the same icon. I think the BPO should be curled, it's the one that's been used most often to make copies so it stands to reason it's going to get curled up. Correct--as they are both linked to the same icon, you would have to run a script to curl every single icon and then put a client-side script to change the icons if the blueprints are BPOs. A decent amount of work, but not unreasonable. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:46:00 - [242] Originally by: Drizit It only needs the icon to be manipulated in PSP with one of those plugins to curl the edge of the page. It would take about 20 seconds. Not sure about the coding though, It may be that both BPO's and BPC's are linked to the same icon. I think the BPO should be curled, it's the one that's been used most often to make copies so it stands to reason it's going to get curled up. Correct--as they are both linked to the same icon, you would have to run a script to curl every single icon and then put a client-side script to change the icons if the blueprints are BPOs. A decent amount of work, but not unreasonable. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:46:00 - [243] Originally by: Drizit It only needs the icon to be manipulated in PSP with one of those plugins to curl the edge of the page. It would take about 20 seconds. Not sure about the coding though, It may be that both BPO's and BPC's are linked to the same icon. I think the BPO should be curled, it's the one that's been used most often to make copies so it stands to reason it's going to get curled up. Correct--as they are both linked to the same icon, you would have to run a script to curl every single icon and then put a client-side script to change the icons if the blueprints are BPOs. A decent amount of work, but not unreasonable. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:46:00 - [244] Originally by: Drizit It only needs the icon to be manipulated in PSP with one of those plugins to curl the edge of the page. It would take about 20 seconds. Not sure about the coding though, It may be that both BPO's and BPC's are linked to the same icon. I think the BPO should be curled, it's the one that's been used most often to make copies so it stands to reason it's going to get curled up. Correct--as they are both linked to the same icon, you would have to run a script to curl every single icon and then put a client-side script to change the icons if the blueprints are BPOs. A decent amount of work, but not unreasonable. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:46:00 - [245] Originally by: Drizit It only needs the icon to be manipulated in PSP with one of those plugins to curl the edge of the page. It would take about 20 seconds. Not sure about the coding though, It may be that both BPO's and BPC's are linked to the same icon. I think the BPO should be curled, it's the one that's been used most often to make copies so it stands to reason it's going to get curled up. Correct--as they are both linked to the same icon, you would have to run a script to curl every single icon and then put a client-side script to change the icons if the blueprints are BPOs. A decent amount of work, but not unreasonable. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:46:00 - [246] Originally by: Drizit It only needs the icon to be manipulated in PSP with one of those plugins to curl the edge of the page. It would take about 20 seconds. Not sure about the coding though, It may be that both BPO's and BPC's are linked to the same icon. I think the BPO should be curled, it's the one that's been used most often to make copies so it stands to reason it's going to get curled up. Correct--as they are both linked to the same icon, you would have to run a script to curl every single icon and then put a client-side script to change the icons if the blueprints are BPOs. A decent amount of work, but not unreasonable. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:46:00 - [247] Originally by: Drizit It only needs the icon to be manipulated in PSP with one of those plugins to curl the edge of the page. It would take about 20 seconds. Not sure about the coding though, It may be that both BPO's and BPC's are linked to the same icon. I think the BPO should be curled, it's the one that's been used most often to make copies so it stands to reason it's going to get curled up. Correct--as they are both linked to the same icon, you would have to run a script to curl every single icon and then put a client-side script to change the icons if the blueprints are BPOs. A decent amount of work, but not unreasonable. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:46:00 - [248] Originally by: Drizit It only needs the icon to be manipulated in PSP with one of those plugins to curl the edge of the page. It would take about 20 seconds. Not sure about the coding though, It may be that both BPO's and BPC's are linked to the same icon. I think the BPO should be curled, it's the one that's been used most often to make copies so it stands to reason it's going to get curled up. Correct--as they are both linked to the same icon, you would have to run a script to curl every single icon and then put a client-side script to change the icons if the blueprints are BPOs. A decent amount of work, but not unreasonable. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:46:00 - [249] Originally by: Drizit It only needs the icon to be manipulated in PSP with one of those plugins to curl the edge of the page. It would take about 20 seconds. Not sure about the coding though, It may be that both BPO's and BPC's are linked to the same icon. I think the BPO should be curled, it's the one that's been used most often to make copies so it stands to reason it's going to get curled up. Correct--as they are both linked to the same icon, you would have to run a script to curl every single icon and then put a client-side script to change the icons if the blueprints are BPOs. A decent amount of work, but not unreasonable. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:46:00 - [250] Originally by: Drizit It only needs the icon to be manipulated in PSP with one of those plugins to curl the edge of the page. It would take about 20 seconds. Not sure about the coding though, It may be that both BPO's and BPC's are linked to the same icon. I think the BPO should be curled, it's the one that's been used most often to make copies so it stands to reason it's going to get curled up. Correct--as they are both linked to the same icon, you would have to run a script to curl every single icon and then put a client-side script to change the icons if the blueprints are BPOs. A decent amount of work, but not unreasonable. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:46:00 - [251] Originally by: Drizit It only needs the icon to be manipulated in PSP with one of those plugins to curl the edge of the page. It would take about 20 seconds. Not sure about the coding though, It may be that both BPO's and BPC's are linked to the same icon. I think the BPO should be curled, it's the one that's been used most often to make copies so it stands to reason it's going to get curled up. Correct--as they are both linked to the same icon, you would have to run a script to curl every single icon and then put a client-side script to change the icons if the blueprints are BPOs. A decent amount of work, but not unreasonable. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:46:00 - [252] Originally by: Drizit It only needs the icon to be manipulated in PSP with one of those plugins to curl the edge of the page. It would take about 20 seconds. Not sure about the coding though, It may be that both BPO's and BPC's are linked to the same icon. I think the BPO should be curled, it's the one that's been used most often to make copies so it stands to reason it's going to get curled up. Correct--as they are both linked to the same icon, you would have to run a script to curl every single icon and then put a client-side script to change the icons if the blueprints are BPOs. A decent amount of work, but not unreasonable. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:46:00 - [253] Originally by: Drizit It only needs the icon to be manipulated in PSP with one of those plugins to curl the edge of the page. It would take about 20 seconds. Not sure about the coding though, It may be that both BPO's and BPC's are linked to the same icon. I think the BPO should be curled, it's the one that's been used most often to make copies so it stands to reason it's going to get curled up. Correct--as they are both linked to the same icon, you would have to run a script to curl every single icon and then put a client-side script to change the icons if the blueprints are BPOs. A decent amount of work, but not unreasonable. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:46:00 - [254] Originally by: Drizit It only needs the icon to be manipulated in PSP with one of those plugins to curl the edge of the page. It would take about 20 seconds. Not sure about the coding though, It may be that both BPO's and BPC's are linked to the same icon. I think the BPO should be curled, it's the one that's been used most often to make copies so it stands to reason it's going to get curled up. Correct--as they are both linked to the same icon, you would have to run a script to curl every single icon and then put a client-side script to change the icons if the blueprints are BPOs. A decent amount of work, but not unreasonable. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:46:00 - [255] Originally by: Drizit It only needs the icon to be manipulated in PSP with one of those plugins to curl the edge of the page. It would take about 20 seconds. Not sure about the coding though, It may be that both BPO's and BPC's are linked to the same icon. I think the BPO should be curled, it's the one that's been used most often to make copies so it stands to reason it's going to get curled up. Correct--as they are both linked to the same icon, you would have to run a script to curl every single icon and then put a client-side script to change the icons if the blueprints are BPOs. A decent amount of work, but not unreasonable. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:46:00 - [256] Originally by: Drizit It only needs the icon to be manipulated in PSP with one of those plugins to curl the edge of the page. It would take about 20 seconds. Not sure about the coding though, It may be that both BPO's and BPC's are linked to the same icon. I think the BPO should be curled, it's the one that's been used most often to make copies so it stands to reason it's going to get curled up. Correct--as they are both linked to the same icon, you would have to run a script to curl every single icon and then put a client-side script to change the icons if the blueprints are BPOs. A decent amount of work, but not unreasonable. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 01:46:00 - [257] Originally by: Drizit It only needs the icon to be manipulated in PSP with one of those plugins to curl the edge of the page. It would take about 20 seconds. Not sure about the coding though, It may be that both BPO's and BPC's are linked to the same icon. I think the BPO should be curled, it's the one that's been used most often to make copies so it stands to reason it's going to get curled up. Correct--as they are both linked to the same icon, you would have to run a script to curl every single icon and then put a client-side script to change the icons if the blueprints are BPOs. A decent amount of work, but not unreasonable. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Naleb Cilani	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:00:00 - [258] Edited by: Naleb Cilani on 27/02/2006 02:11:58 I remember reading a post from one of the Devs that it just wasn't possible (something with code limitation or somesuch)to differentiate BPCs from BPOs graphiclly. Quite aredently might I add. Originally by: Mephysto Which part of "cant do this" did you miss? If we could differntiate between BPc's and BPo's we would have done this already.
Naleb Cilani	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:00:00 - [259] Edited by: Naleb Cilani on 27/02/2006 02:11:58 I remember reading a post from one of the Devs that it just wasn't possible (something with code limitation or somesuch)to differentiate BPCs from BPOs graphiclly. Quite aredently might I add. Originally by: Mephysto Which part of "cant do this" did you miss? If we could differntiate between BPc's and BPo's we would have done this already.
Naleb Cilani	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:00:00 - [260] Edited by: Naleb Cilani on 27/02/2006 02:11:58 I remember reading a post from one of the Devs that it just wasn't possible (something with code limitation or somesuch)to differentiate BPCs from BPOs graphiclly. Quite aredently might I add. Originally by: Mephysto Which part of "cant do this" did you miss? If we could differntiate between BPc's and BPo's we would have done this already.
Naleb Cilani	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:00:00 - [261] Edited by: Naleb Cilani on 27/02/2006 02:11:58 I remember reading a post from one of the Devs that it just wasn't possible (something with code limitation or somesuch)to differentiate BPCs from BPOs graphiclly. Quite aredently might I add. Originally by: Mephysto Which part of "cant do this" did you miss? If we could differntiate between BPc's and BPo's we would have done this already.
Naleb Cilani	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:00:00 - [262] Edited by: Naleb Cilani on 27/02/2006 02:11:58 I remember reading a post from one of the Devs that it just wasn't possible (something with code limitation or somesuch)to differentiate BPCs from BPOs graphiclly. Quite aredently might I add. Originally by: Mephysto Which part of "cant do this" did you miss? If we could differntiate between BPc's and BPo's we would have done this already.
Naleb Cilani	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:00:00 - [263] I remember reading a post from one of the Devs that it just wasn't possible (something with code limitation or somesuch)to differentiate BPCs from BPOs graphiclly. Quite aredently might I add.
Naleb Cilani	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:00:00 - [264] Edited by: Naleb Cilani on 27/02/2006 02:11:58 I remember reading a post from one of the Devs that it just wasn't possible (something with code limitation or somesuch)to differentiate BPCs from BPOs graphiclly. Quite aredently might I add. Originally by: Mephysto Which part of "cant do this" did you miss? If we could differntiate between BPc's and BPo's we would have done this already.
Naleb Cilani	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:00:00 - [265] Edited by: Naleb Cilani on 27/02/2006 02:11:58 I remember reading a post from one of the Devs that it just wasn't possible (something with code limitation or somesuch)to differentiate BPCs from BPOs graphiclly. Quite aredently might I add. Originally by: Mephysto Which part of "cant do this" did you miss? If we could differntiate between BPc's and BPo's we would have done this already.
Naleb Cilani	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:00:00 - [266] Edited by: Naleb Cilani on 27/02/2006 02:11:58 I remember reading a post from one of the Devs that it just wasn't possible (something with code limitation or somesuch)to differentiate BPCs from BPOs graphiclly. Quite aredently might I add. Originally by: Mephysto Which part of "cant do this" did you miss? If we could differntiate between BPc's and BPo's we would have done this already.
Naleb Cilani	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:00:00 - [267] Edited by: Naleb Cilani on 27/02/2006 02:11:58 I remember reading a post from one of the Devs that it just wasn't possible (something with code limitation or somesuch)to differentiate BPCs from BPOs graphiclly. Quite aredently might I add. Originally by: Mephysto Which part of "cant do this" did you miss? If we could differntiate between BPc's and BPo's we would have done this already.
Naleb Cilani	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:00:00 - [268] Edited by: Naleb Cilani on 27/02/2006 02:11:58 I remember reading a post from one of the Devs that it just wasn't possible (something with code limitation or somesuch)to differentiate BPCs from BPOs graphiclly. Quite aredently might I add. Originally by: Mephysto Which part of "cant do this" did you miss? If we could differntiate between BPc's and BPo's we would have done this already.
Naleb Cilani	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:00:00 - [269] Edited by: Naleb Cilani on 27/02/2006 02:11:58 I remember reading a post from one of the Devs that it just wasn't possible (something with code limitation or somesuch)to differentiate BPCs from BPOs graphiclly. Quite aredently might I add. Originally by: Mephysto Which part of "cant do this" did you miss? If we could differntiate between BPc's and BPo's we would have done this already.
Naleb Cilani	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:00:00 - [270] Edited by: Naleb Cilani on 27/02/2006 02:11:58 I remember reading a post from one of the Devs that it just wasn't possible (something with code limitation or somesuch)to differentiate BPCs from BPOs graphiclly. Quite aredently might I add. Originally by: Mephysto Which part of "cant do this" did you miss? If we could differntiate between BPc's and BPo's we would have done this already.
Naleb Cilani	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:00:00 - [271] Edited by: Naleb Cilani on 27/02/2006 02:11:58 I remember reading a post from one of the Devs that it just wasn't possible (something with code limitation or somesuch)to differentiate BPCs from BPOs graphiclly. Quite aredently might I add. Originally by: Mephysto Which part of "cant do this" did you miss? If we could differntiate between BPc's and BPo's we would have done this already.
Naleb Cilani	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:00:00 - [272] Edited by: Naleb Cilani on 27/02/2006 02:11:58 I remember reading a post from one of the Devs that it just wasn't possible (something with code limitation or somesuch)to differentiate BPCs from BPOs graphiclly. Quite aredently might I add. Originally by: Mephysto Which part of "cant do this" did you miss? If we could differntiate between BPc's and BPo's we would have done this already.
Naleb Cilani	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:00:00 - [273] Edited by: Naleb Cilani on 27/02/2006 02:11:58 I remember reading a post from one of the Devs that it just wasn't possible (something with code limitation or somesuch)to differentiate BPCs from BPOs graphiclly. Quite aredently might I add. Originally by: Mephysto Which part of "cant do this" did you miss? If we could differntiate between BPc's and BPo's we would have done this already.
Naleb Cilani	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:00:00 - [274] Edited by: Naleb Cilani on 27/02/2006 02:11:58 I remember reading a post from one of the Devs that it just wasn't possible (something with code limitation or somesuch)to differentiate BPCs from BPOs graphiclly. Quite aredently might I add. Originally by: Mephysto Which part of "cant do this" did you miss? If we could differntiate between BPc's and BPo's we would have done this already.
Naleb Cilani	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:00:00 - [275] Edited by: Naleb Cilani on 27/02/2006 02:11:58 I remember reading a post from one of the Devs that it just wasn't possible (something with code limitation or somesuch)to differentiate BPCs from BPOs graphiclly. Quite aredently might I add. Originally by: Mephysto Which part of "cant do this" did you miss? If we could differntiate between BPc's and BPo's we would have done this already.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:09:00 - [276] Originally by: Naleb Cilani I remember reading a post from one of the Devs that it just wasn't possible (something with code limitation or somesuch)to differentiate BPCs from BPOs graphiclly. Quite aredently might I add. Even if their icon rendering system does not support the replacement of icons in real-time client-side, they can always run a database replacement to replace all BPOs with a seperate item with the same name but a different icon. Would take more work but would do the job just fine. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:09:00 - [277] Originally by: Naleb Cilani I remember reading a post from one of the Devs that it just wasn't possible (something with code limitation or somesuch)to differentiate BPCs from BPOs graphiclly. Quite aredently might I add. Even if their icon rendering system does not support the replacement of icons in real-time client-side, they can always run a database replacement to replace all BPOs with a seperate item with the same name but a different icon. Would take more work but would do the job just fine. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:09:00 - [278] Originally by: Naleb Cilani I remember reading a post from one of the Devs that it just wasn't possible (something with code limitation or somesuch)to differentiate BPCs from BPOs graphiclly. Quite aredently might I add. Even if their icon rendering system does not support the replacement of icons in real-time client-side, they can always run a database replacement to replace all BPOs with a seperate item with the same name but a different icon. Would take more work but would do the job just fine. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:09:00 - [279] Originally by: Naleb Cilani I remember reading a post from one of the Devs that it just wasn't possible (something with code limitation or somesuch)to differentiate BPCs from BPOs graphiclly. Quite aredently might I add. Even if their icon rendering system does not support the replacement of icons in real-time client-side, they can always run a database replacement to replace all BPOs with a seperate item with the same name but a different icon. Would take more work but would do the job just fine. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:09:00 - [280] Originally by: Naleb Cilani I remember reading a post from one of the Devs that it just wasn't possible (something with code limitation or somesuch)to differentiate BPCs from BPOs graphiclly. Quite aredently might I add. Even if their icon rendering system does not support the replacement of icons in real-time client-side, they can always run a database replacement to replace all BPOs with a seperate item with the same name but a different icon. Would take more work but would do the job just fine. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:09:00 - [281] Originally by: Naleb Cilani I remember reading a post from one of the Devs that it just wasn't possible (something with code limitation or somesuch)to differentiate BPCs from BPOs graphiclly. Quite aredently might I add. Even if their icon rendering system does not support the replacement of icons in real-time client-side, they can always run a database replacement to replace all BPOs with a seperate item with the same name but a different icon. Would take more work but would do the job just fine. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:09:00 - [282] Originally by: Naleb Cilani I remember reading a post from one of the Devs that it just wasn't possible (something with code limitation or somesuch)to differentiate BPCs from BPOs graphiclly. Quite aredently might I add. Even if their icon rendering system does not support the replacement of icons in real-time client-side, they can always run a database replacement to replace all BPOs with a seperate item with the same name but a different icon. Would take more work but would do the job just fine. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:09:00 - [283] Originally by: Naleb Cilani I remember reading a post from one of the Devs that it just wasn't possible (something with code limitation or somesuch)to differentiate BPCs from BPOs graphiclly. Quite aredently might I add. Even if their icon rendering system does not support the replacement of icons in real-time client-side, they can always run a database replacement to replace all BPOs with a seperate item with the same name but a different icon. Would take more work but would do the job just fine. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:09:00 - [284] Originally by: Naleb Cilani I remember reading a post from one of the Devs that it just wasn't possible (something with code limitation or somesuch)to differentiate BPCs from BPOs graphiclly. Quite aredently might I add. Even if their icon rendering system does not support the replacement of icons in real-time client-side, they can always run a database replacement to replace all BPOs with a seperate item with the same name but a different icon. Would take more work but would do the job just fine. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:09:00 - [285] Originally by: Naleb Cilani I remember reading a post from one of the Devs that it just wasn't possible (something with code limitation or somesuch)to differentiate BPCs from BPOs graphiclly. Quite aredently might I add. Even if their icon rendering system does not support the replacement of icons in real-time client-side, they can always run a database replacement to replace all BPOs with a seperate item with the same name but a different icon. Would take more work but would do the job just fine. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:09:00 - [286] Originally by: Naleb Cilani I remember reading a post from one of the Devs that it just wasn't possible (something with code limitation or somesuch)to differentiate BPCs from BPOs graphiclly. Quite aredently might I add. Even if their icon rendering system does not support the replacement of icons in real-time client-side, they can always run a database replacement to replace all BPOs with a seperate item with the same name but a different icon. Would take more work but would do the job just fine. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:09:00 - [287] Originally by: Naleb Cilani I remember reading a post from one of the Devs that it just wasn't possible (something with code limitation or somesuch)to differentiate BPCs from BPOs graphiclly. Quite aredently might I add. Even if their icon rendering system does not support the replacement of icons in real-time client-side, they can always run a database replacement to replace all BPOs with a seperate item with the same name but a different icon. Would take more work but would do the job just fine. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:09:00 - [288] Originally by: Naleb Cilani I remember reading a post from one of the Devs that it just wasn't possible (something with code limitation or somesuch)to differentiate BPCs from BPOs graphiclly. Quite aredently might I add. Even if their icon rendering system does not support the replacement of icons in real-time client-side, they can always run a database replacement to replace all BPOs with a seperate item with the same name but a different icon. Would take more work but would do the job just fine. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:09:00 - [289] Originally by: Naleb Cilani I remember reading a post from one of the Devs that it just wasn't possible (something with code limitation or somesuch)to differentiate BPCs from BPOs graphiclly. Quite aredently might I add. Even if their icon rendering system does not support the replacement of icons in real-time client-side, they can always run a database replacement to replace all BPOs with a seperate item with the same name but a different icon. Would take more work but would do the job just fine. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:09:00 - [290] Originally by: Naleb Cilani I remember reading a post from one of the Devs that it just wasn't possible (something with code limitation or somesuch)to differentiate BPCs from BPOs graphiclly. Quite aredently might I add. Even if their icon rendering system does not support the replacement of icons in real-time client-side, they can always run a database replacement to replace all BPOs with a seperate item with the same name but a different icon. Would take more work but would do the job just fine. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:09:00 - [291] Originally by: Naleb Cilani I remember reading a post from one of the Devs that it just wasn't possible (something with code limitation or somesuch)to differentiate BPCs from BPOs graphiclly. Quite aredently might I add. Even if their icon rendering system does not support the replacement of icons in real-time client-side, they can always run a database replacement to replace all BPOs with a seperate item with the same name but a different icon. Would take more work but would do the job just fine. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:09:00 - [292] Originally by: Naleb Cilani I remember reading a post from one of the Devs that it just wasn't possible (something with code limitation or somesuch)to differentiate BPCs from BPOs graphiclly. Quite aredently might I add. Even if their icon rendering system does not support the replacement of icons in real-time client-side, they can always run a database replacement to replace all BPOs with a seperate item with the same name but a different icon. Would take more work but would do the job just fine. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Lord Jester	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:10:00 - [293] seems as tho this is a hot topic...sticy is called for i think so we can see what is going to come of it..... i think it can and should be done my wife is a programer and i seen code and dealt with it myself somewhat...now all to hard.. also the factory thing wher eit shows the state of the blueprint in question..( copy or orginal ,, number of runs , me , pe , etc etc ) even that would be helpful at this time and yea i know its not to much to ask caz i DO have over 800+ copies/orginals combined and cant tell which is which untill i right click >show info and then goto atts of the BP in question so ..... how about it....can we get a response from a DEV and well...lets talk code and patch...i sure wouldnt mind D/L a script to run when i open my BPO / BPC's as it would make my life in eve so much simpler..as for now i got like a weeks worth of BPO / BPC work to do and well...knowing which 1 i am dealing with would be nice and less timely( i would have more time to do other work and not deal with this BPO issue) Thank... Lord Jester
Lord Jester	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:10:00 - [294] seems as tho this is a hot topic...sticy is called for i think so we can see what is going to come of it..... i think it can and should be done my wife is a programer and i seen code and dealt with it myself somewhat...now all to hard.. also the factory thing wher eit shows the state of the blueprint in question..( copy or orginal ,, number of runs , me , pe , etc etc ) even that would be helpful at this time and yea i know its not to much to ask caz i DO have over 800+ copies/orginals combined and cant tell which is which untill i right click >show info and then goto atts of the BP in question so ..... how about it....can we get a response from a DEV and well...lets talk code and patch...i sure wouldnt mind D/L a script to run when i open my BPO / BPC's as it would make my life in eve so much simpler..as for now i got like a weeks worth of BPO / BPC work to do and well...knowing which 1 i am dealing with would be nice and less timely( i would have more time to do other work and not deal with this BPO issue) Thank... Lord Jester
Lord Jester	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:10:00 - [295] seems as tho this is a hot topic...sticy is called for i think so we can see what is going to come of it..... i think it can and should be done my wife is a programer and i seen code and dealt with it myself somewhat...now all to hard.. also the factory thing wher eit shows the state of the blueprint in question..( copy or orginal ,, number of runs , me , pe , etc etc ) even that would be helpful at this time and yea i know its not to much to ask caz i DO have over 800+ copies/orginals combined and cant tell which is which untill i right click >show info and then goto atts of the BP in question so ..... how about it....can we get a response from a DEV and well...lets talk code and patch...i sure wouldnt mind D/L a script to run when i open my BPO / BPC's as it would make my life in eve so much simpler..as for now i got like a weeks worth of BPO / BPC work to do and well...knowing which 1 i am dealing with would be nice and less timely( i would have more time to do other work and not deal with this BPO issue) Thank... Lord Jester
Lord Jester	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:10:00 - [296] seems as tho this is a hot topic...sticy is called for i think so we can see what is going to come of it..... i think it can and should be done my wife is a programer and i seen code and dealt with it myself somewhat...now all to hard.. also the factory thing wher eit shows the state of the blueprint in question..( copy or orginal ,, number of runs , me , pe , etc etc ) even that would be helpful at this time and yea i know its not to much to ask caz i DO have over 800+ copies/orginals combined and cant tell which is which untill i right click >show info and then goto atts of the BP in question so ..... how about it....can we get a response from a DEV and well...lets talk code and patch...i sure wouldnt mind D/L a script to run when i open my BPO / BPC's as it would make my life in eve so much simpler..as for now i got like a weeks worth of BPO / BPC work to do and well...knowing which 1 i am dealing with would be nice and less timely( i would have more time to do other work and not deal with this BPO issue) Thank... Lord Jester
Lord Jester	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:10:00 - [297] seems as tho this is a hot topic...sticy is called for i think so we can see what is going to come of it..... i think it can and should be done my wife is a programer and i seen code and dealt with it myself somewhat...now all to hard.. also the factory thing wher eit shows the state of the blueprint in question..( copy or orginal ,, number of runs , me , pe , etc etc ) even that would be helpful at this time and yea i know its not to much to ask caz i DO have over 800+ copies/orginals combined and cant tell which is which untill i right click >show info and then goto atts of the BP in question so ..... how about it....can we get a response from a DEV and well...lets talk code and patch...i sure wouldnt mind D/L a script to run when i open my BPO / BPC's as it would make my life in eve so much simpler..as for now i got like a weeks worth of BPO / BPC work to do and well...knowing which 1 i am dealing with would be nice and less timely( i would have more time to do other work and not deal with this BPO issue) Thank... Lord Jester
Lord Jester	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:10:00 - [298] seems as tho this is a hot topic...sticy is called for i think so we can see what is going to come of it..... i think it can and should be done my wife is a programer and i seen code and dealt with it myself somewhat...now all to hard.. also the factory thing wher eit shows the state of the blueprint in question..( copy or orginal ,, number of runs , me , pe , etc etc ) even that would be helpful at this time and yea i know its not to much to ask caz i DO have over 800+ copies/orginals combined and cant tell which is which untill i right click >show info and then goto atts of the BP in question so ..... how about it....can we get a response from a DEV and well...lets talk code and patch...i sure wouldnt mind D/L a script to run when i open my BPO / BPC's as it would make my life in eve so much simpler..as for now i got like a weeks worth of BPO / BPC work to do and well...knowing which 1 i am dealing with would be nice and less timely( i would have more time to do other work and not deal with this BPO issue) Thank... Lord Jester
Lord Jester	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:10:00 - [299] seems as tho this is a hot topic...sticy is called for i think so we can see what is going to come of it..... i think it can and should be done my wife is a programer and i seen code and dealt with it myself somewhat...now all to hard.. also the factory thing wher eit shows the state of the blueprint in question..( copy or orginal ,, number of runs , me , pe , etc etc ) even that would be helpful at this time and yea i know its not to much to ask caz i DO have over 800+ copies/orginals combined and cant tell which is which untill i right click >show info and then goto atts of the BP in question so ..... how about it....can we get a response from a DEV and well...lets talk code and patch...i sure wouldnt mind D/L a script to run when i open my BPO / BPC's as it would make my life in eve so much simpler..as for now i got like a weeks worth of BPO / BPC work to do and well...knowing which 1 i am dealing with would be nice and less timely( i would have more time to do other work and not deal with this BPO issue) Thank... Lord Jester
Lord Jester	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:10:00 - [300] seems as tho this is a hot topic...sticy is called for i think so we can see what is going to come of it..... i think it can and should be done my wife is a programer and i seen code and dealt with it myself somewhat...now all to hard.. also the factory thing wher eit shows the state of the blueprint in question..( copy or orginal ,, number of runs , me , pe , etc etc ) even that would be helpful at this time and yea i know its not to much to ask caz i DO have over 800+ copies/orginals combined and cant tell which is which untill i right click >show info and then goto atts of the BP in question so ..... how about it....can we get a response from a DEV and well...lets talk code and patch...i sure wouldnt mind D/L a script to run when i open my BPO / BPC's as it would make my life in eve so much simpler..as for now i got like a weeks worth of BPO / BPC work to do and well...knowing which 1 i am dealing with would be nice and less timely( i would have more time to do other work and not deal with this BPO issue) Thank... Lord Jester
Lord Jester	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:10:00 - [301] seems as tho this is a hot topic...sticy is called for i think so we can see what is going to come of it..... i think it can and should be done my wife is a programer and i seen code and dealt with it myself somewhat...now all to hard.. also the factory thing wher eit shows the state of the blueprint in question..( copy or orginal ,, number of runs , me , pe , etc etc ) even that would be helpful at this time and yea i know its not to much to ask caz i DO have over 800+ copies/orginals combined and cant tell which is which untill i right click >show info and then goto atts of the BP in question so ..... how about it....can we get a response from a DEV and well...lets talk code and patch...i sure wouldnt mind D/L a script to run when i open my BPO / BPC's as it would make my life in eve so much simpler..as for now i got like a weeks worth of BPO / BPC work to do and well...knowing which 1 i am dealing with would be nice and less timely( i would have more time to do other work and not deal with this BPO issue) Thank... Lord Jester
Lord Jester	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:10:00 - [302] seems as tho this is a hot topic...sticy is called for i think so we can see what is going to come of it..... i think it can and should be done my wife is a programer and i seen code and dealt with it myself somewhat...now all to hard.. also the factory thing wher eit shows the state of the blueprint in question..( copy or orginal ,, number of runs , me , pe , etc etc ) even that would be helpful at this time and yea i know its not to much to ask caz i DO have over 800+ copies/orginals combined and cant tell which is which untill i right click >show info and then goto atts of the BP in question so ..... how about it....can we get a response from a DEV and well...lets talk code and patch...i sure wouldnt mind D/L a script to run when i open my BPO / BPC's as it would make my life in eve so much simpler..as for now i got like a weeks worth of BPO / BPC work to do and well...knowing which 1 i am dealing with would be nice and less timely( i would have more time to do other work and not deal with this BPO issue) Thank... Lord Jester
Lord Jester	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:10:00 - [303] seems as tho this is a hot topic...sticy is called for i think so we can see what is going to come of it..... i think it can and should be done my wife is a programer and i seen code and dealt with it myself somewhat...now all to hard.. also the factory thing wher eit shows the state of the blueprint in question..( copy or orginal ,, number of runs , me , pe , etc etc ) even that would be helpful at this time and yea i know its not to much to ask caz i DO have over 800+ copies/orginals combined and cant tell which is which untill i right click >show info and then goto atts of the BP in question so ..... how about it....can we get a response from a DEV and well...lets talk code and patch...i sure wouldnt mind D/L a script to run when i open my BPO / BPC's as it would make my life in eve so much simpler..as for now i got like a weeks worth of BPO / BPC work to do and well...knowing which 1 i am dealing with would be nice and less timely( i would have more time to do other work and not deal with this BPO issue) Thank... Lord Jester
Lord Jester	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:10:00 - [304] seems as tho this is a hot topic...sticy is called for i think so we can see what is going to come of it..... i think it can and should be done my wife is a programer and i seen code and dealt with it myself somewhat...now all to hard.. also the factory thing wher eit shows the state of the blueprint in question..( copy or orginal ,, number of runs , me , pe , etc etc ) even that would be helpful at this time and yea i know its not to much to ask caz i DO have over 800+ copies/orginals combined and cant tell which is which untill i right click >show info and then goto atts of the BP in question so ..... how about it....can we get a response from a DEV and well...lets talk code and patch...i sure wouldnt mind D/L a script to run when i open my BPO / BPC's as it would make my life in eve so much simpler..as for now i got like a weeks worth of BPO / BPC work to do and well...knowing which 1 i am dealing with would be nice and less timely( i would have more time to do other work and not deal with this BPO issue) Thank... Lord Jester
Lord Jester	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:10:00 - [305] seems as tho this is a hot topic...sticy is called for i think so we can see what is going to come of it..... i think it can and should be done my wife is a programer and i seen code and dealt with it myself somewhat...now all to hard.. also the factory thing wher eit shows the state of the blueprint in question..( copy or orginal ,, number of runs , me , pe , etc etc ) even that would be helpful at this time and yea i know its not to much to ask caz i DO have over 800+ copies/orginals combined and cant tell which is which untill i right click >show info and then goto atts of the BP in question so ..... how about it....can we get a response from a DEV and well...lets talk code and patch...i sure wouldnt mind D/L a script to run when i open my BPO / BPC's as it would make my life in eve so much simpler..as for now i got like a weeks worth of BPO / BPC work to do and well...knowing which 1 i am dealing with would be nice and less timely( i would have more time to do other work and not deal with this BPO issue) Thank... Lord Jester
Lord Jester	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:10:00 - [306] seems as tho this is a hot topic...sticy is called for i think so we can see what is going to come of it..... i think it can and should be done my wife is a programer and i seen code and dealt with it myself somewhat...now all to hard.. also the factory thing wher eit shows the state of the blueprint in question..( copy or orginal ,, number of runs , me , pe , etc etc ) even that would be helpful at this time and yea i know its not to much to ask caz i DO have over 800+ copies/orginals combined and cant tell which is which untill i right click >show info and then goto atts of the BP in question so ..... how about it....can we get a response from a DEV and well...lets talk code and patch...i sure wouldnt mind D/L a script to run when i open my BPO / BPC's as it would make my life in eve so much simpler..as for now i got like a weeks worth of BPO / BPC work to do and well...knowing which 1 i am dealing with would be nice and less timely( i would have more time to do other work and not deal with this BPO issue) Thank... Lord Jester
Lord Jester	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:10:00 - [307] seems as tho this is a hot topic...sticy is called for i think so we can see what is going to come of it..... i think it can and should be done my wife is a programer and i seen code and dealt with it myself somewhat...now all to hard.. also the factory thing wher eit shows the state of the blueprint in question..( copy or orginal ,, number of runs , me , pe , etc etc ) even that would be helpful at this time and yea i know its not to much to ask caz i DO have over 800+ copies/orginals combined and cant tell which is which untill i right click >show info and then goto atts of the BP in question so ..... how about it....can we get a response from a DEV and well...lets talk code and patch...i sure wouldnt mind D/L a script to run when i open my BPO / BPC's as it would make my life in eve so much simpler..as for now i got like a weeks worth of BPO / BPC work to do and well...knowing which 1 i am dealing with would be nice and less timely( i would have more time to do other work and not deal with this BPO issue) Thank... Lord Jester
Lord Jester	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:10:00 - [308] seems as tho this is a hot topic...sticy is called for i think so we can see what is going to come of it..... i think it can and should be done my wife is a programer and i seen code and dealt with it myself somewhat...now all to hard.. also the factory thing wher eit shows the state of the blueprint in question..( copy or orginal ,, number of runs , me , pe , etc etc ) even that would be helpful at this time and yea i know its not to much to ask caz i DO have over 800+ copies/orginals combined and cant tell which is which untill i right click >show info and then goto atts of the BP in question so ..... how about it....can we get a response from a DEV and well...lets talk code and patch...i sure wouldnt mind D/L a script to run when i open my BPO / BPC's as it would make my life in eve so much simpler..as for now i got like a weeks worth of BPO / BPC work to do and well...knowing which 1 i am dealing with would be nice and less timely( i would have more time to do other work and not deal with this BPO issue) Thank... Lord Jester
Lord Jester	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:10:00 - [309] seems as tho this is a hot topic...sticy is called for i think so we can see what is going to come of it..... i think it can and should be done my wife is a programer and i seen code and dealt with it myself somewhat...now all to hard.. also the factory thing wher eit shows the state of the blueprint in question..( copy or orginal ,, number of runs , me , pe , etc etc ) even that would be helpful at this time and yea i know its not to much to ask caz i DO have over 800+ copies/orginals combined and cant tell which is which untill i right click >show info and then goto atts of the BP in question so ..... how about it....can we get a response from a DEV and well...lets talk code and patch...i sure wouldnt mind D/L a script to run when i open my BPO / BPC's as it would make my life in eve so much simpler..as for now i got like a weeks worth of BPO / BPC work to do and well...knowing which 1 i am dealing with would be nice and less timely( i would have more time to do other work and not deal with this BPO issue) Thank... Lord Jester
Danton Marcellus	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:27:00 - [310] Edited by: Danton Marcellus on 27/02/2006 02:28:57 I'd like for there to be a function in which you enter the current blueprint total and then from there on run simple checks to see if they're all still there the day after. Manually looking through 400+ originals in some 30 cans is no mans idea of fun. It would sure let me rest easier knowing no blueprints were leaving our secure hangars mysteriously and if so I'd like to be able to pinpoint the date, if only to be able to have a GM rule out software failure. Remind me about The Maze. I'm Danton Marcellus and I approve of this message.
Danton Marcellus	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:27:00 - [311] Edited by: Danton Marcellus on 27/02/2006 02:28:57 I'd like for there to be a function in which you enter the current blueprint total and then from there on run simple checks to see if they're all still there the day after. Manually looking through 400+ originals in some 30 cans is no mans idea of fun. It would sure let me rest easier knowing no blueprints were leaving our secure hangars mysteriously and if so I'd like to be able to pinpoint the date, if only to be able to have a GM rule out software failure. Remind me about The Maze. I'm Danton Marcellus and I approve of this message.
Danton Marcellus	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:27:00 - [312] Edited by: Danton Marcellus on 27/02/2006 02:28:57 I'd like for there to be a function in which you enter the current blueprint total and then from there on run simple checks to see if they're all still there the day after. Manually looking through 400+ originals in some 30 cans is no mans idea of fun. It would sure let me rest easier knowing no blueprints were leaving our secure hangars mysteriously and if so I'd like to be able to pinpoint the date, if only to be able to have a GM rule out software failure. Remind me about The Maze. I'm Danton Marcellus and I approve of this message.
Danton Marcellus	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:27:00 - [313] Edited by: Danton Marcellus on 27/02/2006 02:28:57 I'd like for there to be a function in which you enter the current blueprint total and then from there on run simple checks to see if they're all still there the day after. Manually looking through 400+ originals in some 30 cans is no mans idea of fun. It would sure let me rest easier knowing no blueprints were leaving our secure hangars mysteriously and if so I'd like to be able to pinpoint the date, if only to be able to have a GM rule out software failure. Remind me about The Maze. I'm Danton Marcellus and I approve of this message.
Danton Marcellus	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:27:00 - [314] Edited by: Danton Marcellus on 27/02/2006 02:28:57 I'd like for there to be a function in which you enter the current blueprint total and then from there on run simple checks to see if they're all still there the day after. Manually looking through 400+ originals in some 30 cans is no mans idea of fun. It would sure let me rest easier knowing no blueprints were leaving our secure hangars mysteriously and if so I'd like to be able to pinpoint the date, if only to be able to have a GM rule out software failure. Remind me about The Maze. I'm Danton Marcellus and I approve of this message.
Danton Marcellus	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:27:00 - [315] Edited by: Danton Marcellus on 27/02/2006 02:28:57 I'd like for there to be a function in which you enter the current blueprint total and then from there on run simple checks to see if they're all still there the day after. Manually looking through 400+ originals in some 30 cans is no mans idea of fun. It would sure let me rest easier knowing no blueprints were leaving our secure hangars mysteriously and if so I'd like to be able to pinpoint the date, if only to be able to have a GM rule out software failure. Remind me about The Maze. I'm Danton Marcellus and I approve of this message.
Danton Marcellus	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:27:00 - [316] Edited by: Danton Marcellus on 27/02/2006 02:28:57 I'd like for there to be a function in which you enter the current blueprint total and then from there on run simple checks to see if they're all still there the day after. Manually looking through 400+ originals in some 30 cans is no mans idea of fun. It would sure let me rest easier knowing no blueprints were leaving our secure hangars mysteriously and if so I'd like to be able to pinpoint the date, if only to be able to have a GM rule out software failure. Remind me about The Maze. I'm Danton Marcellus and I approve of this message.
Danton Marcellus	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:27:00 - [317] Edited by: Danton Marcellus on 27/02/2006 02:28:57 I'd like for there to be a function in which you enter the current blueprint total and then from there on run simple checks to see if they're all still there the day after. Manually looking through 400+ originals in some 30 cans is no mans idea of fun. It would sure let me rest easier knowing no blueprints were leaving our secure hangars mysteriously and if so I'd like to be able to pinpoint the date, if only to be able to have a GM rule out software failure. Remind me about The Maze. I'm Danton Marcellus and I approve of this message.
Danton Marcellus	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:27:00 - [318] Edited by: Danton Marcellus on 27/02/2006 02:28:57 I'd like for there to be a function in which you enter the current blueprint total and then from there on run simple checks to see if they're all still there the day after. Manually looking through 400+ originals in some 30 cans is no mans idea of fun. It would sure let me rest easier knowing no blueprints were leaving our secure hangars mysteriously and if so I'd like to be able to pinpoint the date, if only to be able to have a GM rule out software failure. Remind me about The Maze. I'm Danton Marcellus and I approve of this message.
Danton Marcellus	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:27:00 - [319] Edited by: Danton Marcellus on 27/02/2006 02:28:57 I'd like for there to be a function in which you enter the current blueprint total and then from there on run simple checks to see if they're all still there the day after. Manually looking through 400+ originals in some 30 cans is no mans idea of fun. It would sure let me rest easier knowing no blueprints were leaving our secure hangars mysteriously and if so I'd like to be able to pinpoint the date, if only to be able to have a GM rule out software failure. Remind me about The Maze. I'm Danton Marcellus and I approve of this message.
Danton Marcellus	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:27:00 - [320] Edited by: Danton Marcellus on 27/02/2006 02:28:57 I'd like for there to be a function in which you enter the current blueprint total and then from there on run simple checks to see if they're all still there the day after. Manually looking through 400+ originals in some 30 cans is no mans idea of fun. It would sure let me rest easier knowing no blueprints were leaving our secure hangars mysteriously and if so I'd like to be able to pinpoint the date, if only to be able to have a GM rule out software failure. Remind me about The Maze. I'm Danton Marcellus and I approve of this message.
Danton Marcellus	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:27:00 - [321] Edited by: Danton Marcellus on 27/02/2006 02:28:57 I'd like for there to be a function in which you enter the current blueprint total and then from there on run simple checks to see if they're all still there the day after. Manually looking through 400+ originals in some 30 cans is no mans idea of fun. It would sure let me rest easier knowing no blueprints were leaving our secure hangars mysteriously and if so I'd like to be able to pinpoint the date, if only to be able to have a GM rule out software failure. Remind me about The Maze. I'm Danton Marcellus and I approve of this message.
Danton Marcellus	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:27:00 - [322] Edited by: Danton Marcellus on 27/02/2006 02:28:57 I'd like for there to be a function in which you enter the current blueprint total and then from there on run simple checks to see if they're all still there the day after. Manually looking through 400+ originals in some 30 cans is no mans idea of fun. It would sure let me rest easier knowing no blueprints were leaving our secure hangars mysteriously and if so I'd like to be able to pinpoint the date, if only to be able to have a GM rule out software failure. Remind me about The Maze. I'm Danton Marcellus and I approve of this message.
Danton Marcellus	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:27:00 - [323] Edited by: Danton Marcellus on 27/02/2006 02:28:57 I'd like for there to be a function in which you enter the current blueprint total and then from there on run simple checks to see if they're all still there the day after. Manually looking through 400+ originals in some 30 cans is no mans idea of fun. It would sure let me rest easier knowing no blueprints were leaving our secure hangars mysteriously and if so I'd like to be able to pinpoint the date, if only to be able to have a GM rule out software failure. Remind me about The Maze. I'm Danton Marcellus and I approve of this message.
Danton Marcellus	Posted - 2006.02.27 02:27:00 - [324] Edited by: Danton Marcellus on 27/02/2006 02:28:57 I'd like for there to be a function in which you enter the current blueprint total and then from there on run simple checks to see if they're all still there the day after. Manually looking through 400+ originals in some 30 cans is no mans idea of fun. It would sure let me rest easier knowing no blueprints were leaving our secure hangars mysteriously and if so I'd like to be able to pinpoint the date, if only to be able to have a GM rule out software failure. Remind me about The Maze. I'm Danton Marcellus and I approve of this message.
Drused	Posted - 2006.02.27 03:18:00 - [325] I don't see what the deal is with an If statement or the equivalent being used. If runs = Unlimted => Use Icon RedBP, else Use Icon Blue BP.
Drused	Posted - 2006.02.27 03:18:00 - [326] I don't see what the deal is with an If statement or the equivalent being used. If runs = Unlimted => Use Icon RedBP, else Use Icon Blue BP.
Drused	Posted - 2006.02.27 03:18:00 - [327] I don't see what the deal is with an If statement or the equivalent being used. If runs = Unlimted => Use Icon RedBP, else Use Icon Blue BP.
Drused	Posted - 2006.02.27 03:18:00 - [328] I don't see what the deal is with an If statement or the equivalent being used. If runs = Unlimted => Use Icon RedBP, else Use Icon Blue BP.
Drused	Posted - 2006.02.27 03:18:00 - [329] I don't see what the deal is with an If statement or the equivalent being used. If runs = Unlimted => Use Icon RedBP, else Use Icon Blue BP.
Drused	Posted - 2006.02.27 03:18:00 - [330] I don't see what the deal is with an If statement or the equivalent being used. If runs = Unlimted => Use Icon RedBP, else Use Icon Blue BP.
Drused	Posted - 2006.02.27 03:18:00 - [331] I don't see what the deal is with an If statement or the equivalent being used. If runs = Unlimted => Use Icon RedBP, else Use Icon Blue BP.
Drused	Posted - 2006.02.27 03:18:00 - [332] I don't see what the deal is with an If statement or the equivalent being used. If runs = Unlimted => Use Icon RedBP, else Use Icon Blue BP.
Drused	Posted - 2006.02.27 03:18:00 - [333] I don't see what the deal is with an If statement or the equivalent being used. If runs = Unlimted => Use Icon RedBP, else Use Icon Blue BP.
Drused	Posted - 2006.02.27 03:18:00 - [334] I don't see what the deal is with an If statement or the equivalent being used. If runs = Unlimted => Use Icon RedBP, else Use Icon Blue BP.
Drused	Posted - 2006.02.27 03:18:00 - [335] I don't see what the deal is with an If statement or the equivalent being used. If runs = Unlimted => Use Icon RedBP, else Use Icon Blue BP.
Drused	Posted - 2006.02.27 03:18:00 - [336] I don't see what the deal is with an If statement or the equivalent being used. If runs = Unlimted => Use Icon RedBP, else Use Icon Blue BP.
Drused	Posted - 2006.02.27 03:18:00 - [337] I don't see what the deal is with an If statement or the equivalent being used. If runs = Unlimted => Use Icon RedBP, else Use Icon Blue BP.
Drused	Posted - 2006.02.27 03:18:00 - [338] I don't see what the deal is with an If statement or the equivalent being used. If runs = Unlimted => Use Icon RedBP, else Use Icon Blue BP.
G Dabak	Posted - 2006.02.27 05:15:00 - [339] Everyone always becomes Mr. Programmer and says "well you can just do codeblahblahsqlquery" but in something the scale of EVE it's going to be very complicated. Hacking in something that checks for BPs in a result or rewriting the way BPs work is probably unacceptably difficult or costly in performance. But I bet they'll figure out some solution eventually, like some kind of special corporate blueprint storage or something.
G Dabak	Posted - 2006.02.27 05:15:00 - [340] Everyone always becomes Mr. Programmer and says "well you can just do codeblahblahsqlquery" but in something the scale of EVE it's going to be very complicated. Hacking in something that checks for BPs in a result or rewriting the way BPs work is probably unacceptably difficult or costly in performance. But I bet they'll figure out some solution eventually, like some kind of special corporate blueprint storage or something.
G Dabak	Posted - 2006.02.27 05:15:00 - [341] Everyone always becomes Mr. Programmer and says "well you can just do codeblahblahsqlquery" but in something the scale of EVE it's going to be very complicated. Hacking in something that checks for BPs in a result or rewriting the way BPs work is probably unacceptably difficult or costly in performance. But I bet they'll figure out some solution eventually, like some kind of special corporate blueprint storage or something.
G Dabak	Posted - 2006.02.27 05:15:00 - [342] Everyone always becomes Mr. Programmer and says "well you can just do codeblahblahsqlquery" but in something the scale of EVE it's going to be very complicated. Hacking in something that checks for BPs in a result or rewriting the way BPs work is probably unacceptably difficult or costly in performance. But I bet they'll figure out some solution eventually, like some kind of special corporate blueprint storage or something.
G Dabak	Posted - 2006.02.27 05:15:00 - [343] Everyone always becomes Mr. Programmer and says "well you can just do codeblahblahsqlquery" but in something the scale of EVE it's going to be very complicated. Hacking in something that checks for BPs in a result or rewriting the way BPs work is probably unacceptably difficult or costly in performance. But I bet they'll figure out some solution eventually, like some kind of special corporate blueprint storage or something.
Da Death	Posted - 2006.02.27 05:27:00 - [344] ./signed Absolution + Curse Pack 350m! ->Click here!<-
Da Death	Posted - 2006.02.27 05:27:00 - [345] ./signed Absolution + Curse Pack 350m! ->Click here!<-
Da Death	Posted - 2006.02.27 05:27:00 - [346] ./signed Absolution + Curse Pack 350m! ->Click here!<-
Da Death	Posted - 2006.02.27 05:27:00 - [347] ./signed Absolution + Curse Pack 350m! ->Click here!<-
Da Death	Posted - 2006.02.27 05:27:00 - [348] ./signed Absolution + Curse Pack 350m! ->Click here!<-
Max Grief	Posted - 2006.02.27 06:54:00 - [349] The weird thing is.......... back during EVE:TSG They HAD different icon's the blueprints were a dark blue and the copy's were a more opaque blue with the picture of the item almost white. I'm sure a few of you remember. Why did that ever go away? It was useful. But a Red-Blue setup would be nice, cause thats pretty idiot proof.
Max Grief	Posted - 2006.02.27 06:54:00 - [350] The weird thing is.......... back during EVE:TSG They HAD different icon's the blueprints were a dark blue and the copy's were a more opaque blue with the picture of the item almost white. I'm sure a few of you remember. Why did that ever go away? It was useful. But a Red-Blue setup would be nice, cause thats pretty idiot proof.
Max Grief	Posted - 2006.02.27 06:54:00 - [351] The weird thing is.......... back during EVE:TSG They HAD different icon's the blueprints were a dark blue and the copy's were a more opaque blue with the picture of the item almost white. I'm sure a few of you remember. Why did that ever go away? It was useful. But a Red-Blue setup would be nice, cause thats pretty idiot proof.
Max Grief	Posted - 2006.02.27 06:54:00 - [352] The weird thing is.......... back during EVE:TSG They HAD different icon's the blueprints were a dark blue and the copy's were a more opaque blue with the picture of the item almost white. I'm sure a few of you remember. Why did that ever go away? It was useful. But a Red-Blue setup would be nice, cause thats pretty idiot proof.
Tachy	Posted - 2006.02.27 07:00:00 - [353] The devs are not willing to duplicate the number of entries for BP in the database for making BPO different from BPC. That probably would be the prerequisite to give the BPC a different look, and what would be even more interesting, the #runs left on the icon ... wanders off having an idea --==*-- Megadon CCP wanted a well known artist and celebrity to test the new font so it's approval would be well known. They got Ray
Tachy	Posted - 2006.02.27 07:00:00 - [354] The devs are not willing to duplicate the number of entries for BP in the database for making BPO different from BPC. That probably would be the prerequisite to give the BPC a different look, and what would be even more interesting, the #runs left on the icon ... wanders off having an idea --==*-- Megadon CCP wanted a well known artist and celebrity to test the new font so it's approval would be well known. They got Ray
Tachy	Posted - 2006.02.27 07:00:00 - [355] The devs are not willing to duplicate the number of entries for BP in the database for making BPO different from BPC. That probably would be the prerequisite to give the BPC a different look, and what would be even more interesting, the #runs left on the icon ... wanders off having an idea --==*-- Megadon CCP wanted a well known artist and celebrity to test the new font so it's approval would be well known. They got Ray
Tachy	Posted - 2006.02.27 07:00:00 - [356] The devs are not willing to duplicate the number of entries for BP in the database for making BPO different from BPC. That probably would be the prerequisite to give the BPC a different look, and what would be even more interesting, the #runs left on the icon ... wanders off having an idea --==*-- Megadon CCP wanted a well known artist and celebrity to test the new font so it's approval would be well known. They got Ray
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.02.27 09:15:00 - [357] Originally by: Dark Shikari Originally by: Bawldeux IV seems easy. bpc has limited runs or another atribute that makes it different then a bpo, so just use that as a flag, and bpo gets original graphic, bpc gets a different graphic, simple, has only to use the exisiting db fields, and can be client side, simple huh... The claim was that in order to do that the client would have to request all the database entries for the BPO, not just the header. However, as stated before, this claim is BS as this exact thing has been done for ages in the factory system just fine. yes, but how often do you open the factory compared to opening a general container/cargohold? Well okay, asking you that might not be the best idea in the world, but you get the point Here's an idea: Make copies of some random bookmarks that equal the number of bpos/bpcs in your hangar at the moment. Drop them into your main station hangar and then relog. Now try and open your hangar. The lag you're getting is the result of having to do deep database searches on another table to get the name of each bookmark. The principle is exactly the same for getting the number of runs on a blueprint in order to display them differently. Originally by: Zzazzt Originally by: thoth foc PA doesnt stand for anything.. Punchbag Alliance...
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.02.27 09:15:00 - [358] Originally by: Dark Shikari Originally by: Bawldeux IV seems easy. bpc has limited runs or another atribute that makes it different then a bpo, so just use that as a flag, and bpo gets original graphic, bpc gets a different graphic, simple, has only to use the exisiting db fields, and can be client side, simple huh... The claim was that in order to do that the client would have to request all the database entries for the BPO, not just the header. However, as stated before, this claim is BS as this exact thing has been done for ages in the factory system just fine. yes, but how often do you open the factory compared to opening a general container/cargohold? Well okay, asking you that might not be the best idea in the world, but you get the point Here's an idea: Make copies of some random bookmarks that equal the number of bpos/bpcs in your hangar at the moment. Drop them into your main station hangar and then relog. Now try and open your hangar. The lag you're getting is the result of having to do deep database searches on another table to get the name of each bookmark. The principle is exactly the same for getting the number of runs on a blueprint in order to display them differently. Originally by: Zzazzt Originally by: thoth foc PA doesnt stand for anything.. Punchbag Alliance...
Calleb	Posted - 2006.02.27 09:36:00 - [359] This must be one of the longest running arguments in EVE. Since the first copy was made people have been asking for a way diferentiate between originals and copies. I guess there realy must be some sort of problem in doing this within the programing else it would have been fixed by now. I agree with some of the posts above that it would on the surface seem easy to put an "original" overlay on top of BPO icons (nothing else would need to be added to the vastly higher number of copies, and would remain unchanged) but i dont know how the program is structured so i have to accept what we have been told hundreds of times before.
Calleb	Posted - 2006.02.27 09:36:00 - [360] This must be one of the longest running arguments in EVE. Since the first copy was made people have been asking for a way diferentiate between originals and copies. I guess there realy must be some sort of problem in doing this within the programing else it would have been fixed by now. I agree with some of the posts above that it would on the surface seem easy to put an "original" overlay on top of BPO icons (nothing else would need to be added to the vastly higher number of copies, and would remain unchanged) but i dont know how the program is structured so i have to accept what we have been told hundreds of times before.
Avon	Posted - 2006.02.27 09:40:00 - [361] The solution, obviously, is to get rid of all BPC's. Easy. The Battleships is not and should not be a solo pwnmobile - Oveur
Avon	Posted - 2006.02.27 09:40:00 - [362] The solution, obviously, is to get rid of all BPC's. Easy. The Battleships is not and should not be a solo pwnmobile - Oveur
Gariuys	Posted - 2006.02.27 09:44:00 - [363] Originally by: Avon The solution, obviously, is to get rid of all BPC's. Easy. Would kill most small producers. Not your best idea IMHO. Although more limits on them would be fine, those 1000s of 3 run bpcs are annoying as hell. ~{When evil and strange get together anything is possible}~ A tool is only useless when you don't know how to use it. - ActiveX The grass is always greener on the other side. - JoCool
Gariuys	Posted - 2006.02.27 09:44:00 - [364] Originally by: Avon The solution, obviously, is to get rid of all BPC's. Easy. Would kill most small producers. Not your best idea IMHO. Although more limits on them would be fine, those 1000s of 3 run bpcs are annoying as hell. ~{When evil and strange get together anything is possible}~ A tool is only useless when you don't know how to use it. - ActiveX The grass is always greener on the other side. - JoCool
Sensor Error	Posted - 2006.02.27 10:36:00 - [365] Originally by: Dark Shikari Originally by: Johnny Twoshoe Originally by: Karl Mattar I completely agree. Make the icon for the BPO or the BPC different from the other. CCP, that alone would help soooo much. They've said a dozen times that despite how much they want to do this, they simply can't. Ideas have been suggested by the player base but will not work for one reason or another. This is obviously not true, as before the factory revamp, you could open up your factory screen and see the runs left on every single one of your BPs, along with ME/PE, in a fraction of a second. This works even if you have over a thousand BPOs. Unless this caused "unnecessary server load", there's no reason it can't be done. well yes and no... Yes, it only takes a moment load all the bps - but thats with your average player doing it maybe a couple of times a week. Imagine having to do that every time you look at your inv... It's not a pretty thought, and all the processing soon adds up. Just stop being so damn lazy and store BPO's in a seperated container... ------------------------------------------ Now run along and play with your dolls...
Avon	Posted - 2006.02.27 10:40:00 - [366] Originally by: Gariuys Originally by: Avon The solution, obviously, is to get rid of all BPC's. Easy. Would kill most small producers. Not your best idea IMHO. Although more limits on them would be fine, those 1000s of 3 run bpcs are annoying as hell. Yeah, it would now. Originally you were meant to be able to produce 2 copies to protect your investment, but that was dropped. BPC's killed tech1. Fortunately the situation was addressed with tech2, making it take longer to copy than to produce. The Battleships is not and should not be a solo pwnmobile - Oveur
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 10:43:00 - [367] Originally by: Sarmaul Originally by: Dark Shikari Originally by: Bawldeux IV seems easy. bpc has limited runs or another atribute that makes it different then a bpo, so just use that as a flag, and bpo gets original graphic, bpc gets a different graphic, simple, has only to use the exisiting db fields, and can be client side, simple huh... The claim was that in order to do that the client would have to request all the database entries for the BPO, not just the header. However, as stated before, this claim is BS as this exact thing has been done for ages in the factory system just fine. yes, but how often do you open the factory compared to opening a general container/cargohold? Well okay, asking you that might not be the best idea in the world, but you get the point I think I might open the factory more [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
Corp Scammer	Posted - 2006.02.27 10:45:00 - [368] the green blue idea was brought up and ignored ie green for BPCs and blue for BPOs - CCP have shown no interest
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.02.27 10:49:00 - [369] Originally by: Gariuys Originally by: Avon The solution, obviously, is to get rid of all BPC's. Easy. Would kill most small producers. Not your best idea IMHO. Although more limits on them would be fine, those 1000s of 3 run bpcs are annoying as hell. no, it would kill off the vast majority of 1-time undercutters. BPOs are dirt cheap to buy besides some of the bigger ships. Just think, battleships might actually be worth building again for general sale Originally by: Zzazzt Originally by: thoth foc PA doesnt stand for anything.. Punchbag Alliance...
Tar om	Posted - 2006.02.27 11:23:00 - [370] Originally by: Sarmaul the reason is that BPCs and BPOs are exactly the same - the only difference is their number of runs (i.e. bpos set to infinate, bpcs aren't). This kind of information isn't stored in the regular item list, and as such a full database query would be needed for each blueprint to determine how many runs it has left. Now imagine players with hundreds of BPCs opening up their assets. LAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAG What about the "Copy = NO/YES" field? Anyway, the "Full Database Query" can't be that hard- they already did it when they purged the 0 run copies a while back. -- We are the Octavian Vanguard www.octavianvanguard.net "The belief in the possibility of a short decisive war appears to be one of the most ancient and dangerous of human illusions."
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.02.27 11:26:00 - [371] Originally by: Tar om Originally by: Sarmaul the reason is that BPCs and BPOs are exactly the same - the only difference is their number of runs (i.e. bpos set to infinate, bpcs aren't). This kind of information isn't stored in the regular item list, and as such a full database query would be needed for each blueprint to determine how many runs it has left. Now imagine players with hundreds of BPCs opening up their assets. LAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAG What about the "Copy = NO/YES" field? Anyway, the "Full Database Query" can't be that hard- they already did it when they purged the 0 run copies a while back. like I said, BPOs and BPCs are stored in exactly the same way. ME? Same way. PE? Same way. Number of runs? Same way. And remember, the only difference between a BPO and a BPC is the number of runs. Originally by: Zzazzt Originally by: thoth foc PA doesnt stand for anything.. Punchbag Alliance...
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.27 11:28:00 - [372] Originally by: Sarmaul Originally by: Tar om Originally by: Sarmaul the reason is that BPCs and BPOs are exactly the same - the only difference is their number of runs (i.e. bpos set to infinate, bpcs aren't). This kind of information isn't stored in the regular item list, and as such a full database query would be needed for each blueprint to determine how many runs it has left. Now imagine players with hundreds of BPCs opening up their assets. LAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAG What about the "Copy = NO/YES" field? Anyway, the "Full Database Query" can't be that hard- they already did it when they purged the 0 run copies a while back. like I said, BPOs and BPCs are stored in exactly the same way. ME? Same way. PE? Same way. Number of runs? Same way. And remember, the only difference between a BPO and a BPC is the number of runs. Correct, but that's just a single INT attribute. A -1 value means a BPO. Not really hard to query. [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
000Hunter000	Posted - 2006.02.27 11:59:00 - [373] Put a big letter "C" on the BPC... dunno if thats hard to code into the game though.
Yumina Tsumiko	Posted - 2006.02.27 12:12:00 - [374] Originally by: Sarmaul the reason is that BPCs and BPOs are exactly the same - the only difference is their number of runs (i.e. bpos set to infinate, bpcs aren't). This kind of information isn't stored in the regular item list, and as such a full database query would be needed for each blueprint to determine how many runs it has left. Now imagine players with hundreds of BPCs opening up their assets. LAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAG Yes, we've all heard it a million times, bpo's have -1 runs, bpc's has some finite number of runs.. and if ccp really wanted to make it easy on us, im sure it wouldnt be THAT hard to put an extra column in the database for the item being a "bpc", but then again, i cant say's i've seen their db except from the export, and that isnt much help cause its the static data. But in most applicaitons, unless someone is an idiot and sticks in a "select *..." in their queries implementing another column is usually not that big of a pain. On hard hit db's which eve's no doubt is theres a bit of planning that needs to be done. Something a bit on the side worth noting tho, in escrow theres a "runs" column. But dam, the whole bpo/bpc thing has been such a big pain the rear for so long now. But, it occurs to me, i'd be happy if i could "deliver" bpos from and to containers, then at least it would make them a bit easier to sort thru. When you do a big copy run on a bpo and see all the copies and the original plop out to the one location its really not much fun hoping the last bp in the list is actaully the original, and even worse, imagine a patch changed that scenario (accidentally)? "whoops, i just escrowed my original megathron bp for 2mil isk..".
Saldun Zexu	Posted - 2006.02.27 13:15:00 - [375] Edited by: Saldun Zexu on 27/02/2006 13:15:51 simple, don't need to change DB just make little client-side script that will check if bp has limited run/s then change icon on that bpc. also add BPO/C check toggle on/off if that script will cause machine lag.
Plutoinum	Posted - 2006.02.27 13:51:00 - [376] Edited by: Plutoinum on 27/02/2006 13:55:20 Edited by: Plutoinum on 27/02/2006 13:54:56 Originally by: Sensor Error Just stop being so damn lazy and store BPO's in a seperated container... I usually start my production and research from a few systems away. That's why I've trained the skills. So I don't put them into a container, because I can't start production or research out of a containter. Also the reason, why some of my hangars look chaotic: Container content is not searchable/browsable in the assert list. ( Reminds me of something that a friend asked me: 'Do you have a gurista blabla xy tag ?'... 'Maybe, but all my tags are in a secure container in Lustrevik and I'm in Curse now.' )

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 .. 13 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.