|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
570
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 02:39:00 -
[1] - Quote
Damn it, now I won't be able to use a 1400 Tempest to blap mackinaws just for ~kicks~ |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
570
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 02:41:00 -
[2] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Andski wrote:Damn it, now I won't be able to use a 1400 Tempest to blap mackinaws just for ~kicks~ Nah. You have to use Catalysts insteadGǪ poor you.
Losing a Brutix entirely is cheaper than losing a fully insured Tempest in any case, but it was hilarious. |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
572
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 06:12:00 -
[3] - Quote
Krios Ahzek wrote:The real tears will be from the miners when they find out that gankers actually do not give a crap about insurance.
not empty quoting |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
572
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 06:15:00 -
[4] - Quote
SilentSkills wrote:Crap. my bucket is full..
/gets new tear bucket
Can't have enough ganker tears!
Gankers, unlike most of their victims, are able to adjust their tactics when game mechanics are changed against their favor.
I welcome this change, to be quite honest - it will make miners so much more complacent in their supposed "safety" that they will totally neglect taking any measures to protect themselves. |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
573
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 06:18:00 -
[5] - Quote
Poetic Stanziel wrote:ShipToaster wrote:Wait, you mean Poetic Stanzeil was right? Score one for the tinfoil hatters. Hilmar said he wanted to make CONCORD smarter ... I suppose those smarts was invalidating insurance claims. :) This won't put an end to ganking. It won't put an end to ganking for profit. Nor should it. Ganking is a valuable part of this game. But gankers will have to use a couple braincells in their target selection. They might even have to create a spreadsheet. ;)
By the time any ganker worth his salt is redboxing you, he already knows exactly how you're fit.
On our end, we might have to increase our bounty payouts and throw in a slight cushion for flubbed ganks, but this will not put a dent in our campaign in the /slightest./ |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
573
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 06:27:00 -
[6] - Quote
Scrapyard Bob wrote:(The only real solution there is to give the barges/exhumers more CPU/PG so that they truly have the option to fit a tanky setup, rather then the choice right now of "one piece of tin foil" or "two pieces of tin foil" on the Mackinaw. You can fit a better tank on a T1 industrial then you can get onto the more expensive T2 exhumers.)
Bombers are more fragile than, say, Punishers. Nobody complains about that. |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
573
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 07:22:00 -
[7] - Quote
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:This will help a bit but I doubt it will even cause a 10 percent drop in the ganks.
Why? Because in the old days the ganking was done in teams for direct and risk free epic profit. However, Today it is far less direct but gain as far as market prices.
The big nullsec alliances are greatly benefiting from higher mineral prices that their bots produce. And yes I accuse many of knowingly using bots. Or turning a blind eye because they are "blue"
However the ganking is mostly scaring the active players away from the belts. The bots don't give a rats butt because they can easily replace lost ships and they don't have to worry about playtime. Therefore the next time some alliance alt tells you they are just trying to "clean up the bots" please keep that in mind.
So we need alot more to end this crap. Namely giving mining craft slow to no regen buffers that can outlast an alpha strike to give current concord time to respond.
I propose that all mining craft be given a massive boost to structure hit points.
ahahahahahahahahaha |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
573
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 08:57:00 -
[8] - Quote
Jhagiti Tyran wrote:Anyone notice how the carebears that are completely unable to create tears of their own eagerly clutch at anything somebody that doesn't agree with them says and claim they are tears?
Just so you understand, you do know this wont save miners? Nor will it save idiots that cram several hundred million into a T1 hauler, and it wont save 5b isk Tengus either. So before you go around cheering and calling opinions "tears" you should really think about those three facts.
YOU ARE RUINING THE WHOLE PLAN.
:mad: |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
574
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 21:32:00 -
[9] - Quote
high-sec will be safe now guys!!! feel free to undock your badgers full of BPOs, your officer fit tengus and don't bother upgrading your clone ever, it's not necessary at all and a massive waste of ISK |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
574
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 23:18:00 -
[10] - Quote
"Hey man, could you rep me real quick?"
"Sure!"
*shoots a can*
i am going to have so much ~fun~ |
|
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
574
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 23:22:00 -
[11] - Quote
Vigdis Thorisdottir wrote:Wow. All I ever see in these threads are "pvpers" whining about carebears, over and over again. Have a problem with corps escaping wardecs? Try deccing a pvp corp for once instead of a corp full of n00b miners. Have problem with getting insurance taken away for being concorded? Suicide gank anyways. It's not like it got any harder to do. If anything, it will be even easier due to the carebears feeling "safer" now.
Seriously listen to yourselves. A group that is always first to spout "adapt or die" should take their own advice for once.
only the idiots are whining, the rest of us can't wait |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
575
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 23:55:00 -
[12] - Quote
Aggressive Nutmeg wrote:I think most of us define a 'carebear' as someone who engages in activity within EVE that has little or no risk attached to it. By that definition you'd have to say suicide ganking is probably the ultimate carebear activity. Removal of insurance helps, but suicide ganking is still pretty cheap.
Miners take a huge risk every time they undock their Hulks. Hisec is crawling with carebear suicide gankers.
But I'd be happy to see CONCORD removed. The idea that CONCORD can magically appear anywhere in empire and instantly catch and kill the 'baddies' is a bit far-fetched.
But it is also far-fetched that any 'baddy' can suicide gank an innocent ship quite cheaply and then magically get re-born, without suspension or gaol time, to go ahead and kill the next innocent ship.
Empire can be just as safe if we fix the above stupid game mechanics. Very few players are going to REGULARLY gank innocents if it means their character will be suspended (in some way) for a period of time - and then perhaps be 'shadowed' by the faction police when they're released on parole. :)
"high-sec is not intended to be safe" |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
576
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 01:10:00 -
[13] - Quote
Richard Hammond II wrote:apparently CCP disagrees now
Plus, you guys should be happy as hell, youre getting CCP to break the game FOR you like Goons have been trying to do like forever
"Grief play and misery make you happy."
lol find any definition of this in EVE
It basically doesnt exist
Unless you can flip in a starter system oooo then watch out. They put it in the EULA (or somesuch) an everything lol
you're dumb if you think this will curtail or do anything to limit suicide ganking |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
581
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 12:13:00 -
[14] - Quote
Jaroslav Unwanted wrote:Malcanis wrote:Michael Holmes Holmes wrote: besides, I doubt you would have much to shoot at if carebears could not build your ships and ammo for you.
You realise that "PvPers" can train industry skills as well as anyone else, right? And that's before we even consider alts. Then they are no longer PvPers but EVE players... Get your fact straight. PvPers are arcade players... they play to destroy, and often get destroyed, they buy GTCs and sells them to have their "five seconds of glory" in game.
Very few "PvPers" sell GTCs for ISK to fund themselves. |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
581
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 12:25:00 -
[15] - Quote
please keep coining more portmanteaus involving "nullsec", it makes you look clever and witty |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
598
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 20:58:00 -
[16] - Quote
Lord Wiggin wrote:Ladie Harlot wrote:Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Ladie Harlot wrote:Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:highsec PVP - griefing You invalidate all your other statements when you keep insisting that highsec PvP is griefing. I cast thee back to 0.0. Sorry I have blue ice to interdict. If you feel that is griefing then you should report it to CCP. Kinda looks like you kids have failed at Ice interdiction....tons of macs in the belt in Ard...
thanks for the intel |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
605
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 20:45:00 -
[17] - Quote
Corina Jarr wrote:Tanking does work, as does being aware, as does manual piloting. Proven every day that someone survives a gank*.
The only thing proven when someone survives a gank is that somebody got too ballsy and forgot to scan. |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
605
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 20:47:00 -
[18] - Quote
Tanya Powers wrote: The normal progression should always be, high sec, low sec, null sec.
It's not and never was, but keep thinking that. |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
634
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 00:10:00 -
[19] - Quote
Richard Aiel wrote:Andski wrote:Tanya Powers wrote: The normal progression should always be, high sec, low sec, null sec.
It's not and never was, but keep thinking that. Hate to agree with a Goon but there IS NO progression in this game, and nor should there be IF the game is the sandbox ppl pretend it is.
To expand on that, my alliance recruits straight-up newbies on trial accounts from out-of-game communities like Something Awful, gets them out to nullsec, hands them skillbooks, implants, ISK and an endless amount of free frigates, and over time we turn them into jaded bittervets. This "linear progression" is nonsense - I've seen people with their original 2003 characters who still run missions in high-sec all day. |
|
|
|