EVE Search - CFC Declares War on N3.

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

CFC Declares War on N3.

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 3 post(s)
baltec1 Bat Country Goonswarm Federation 9039	Posted - 2013.12.15 13:53:00 - [1] - Quote CCP, I need that jump capable Mega BPO now more than ever. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
baltec1 Bat Country Goonswarm Federation 9040	Posted - 2013.12.15 14:42:00 - [2] - Quote Pinky Hops wrote: Have some basic respect for your enemies. Intelligent people don't use crappy strategies and tactics. That would be stupidity - not intelligence. To talk down to your enemies because they use strong tactics is backwards. Smart people will take advantage of terribly balanced things if it gives them an edge The carrier fleet we are going to destroy is immune to all subcap fleets. We are yet again fighting a capital blob that threatens all of EVE. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
baltec1 Bat Country Goonswarm Federation 9043	Posted - 2013.12.15 15:43:00 - [3] - Quote Dracvlad wrote: James Amril-Kesh wrote: Dracvlad wrote: The slowcat fleet, and of course the drone assist, of course they can be countered, just keep bombing them until even the carriers run out of sentries, will take a lot of bombing, but its doable. You can recall sentries, you know. Yes of course, but recalling, deploying, apply assist, recalling does reduce DPS a bit and not everyone is on the ball, I did not say it would be easy, its doable! Given that no subcap fleet poses a threat to them I don't think time is something they fear much. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
baltec1 Bat Country Goonswarm Federation 9043	Posted - 2013.12.15 16:15:00 - [4] - Quote Dracvlad wrote: The blob works against itself in terms of time due to TiDi too, so I see your point, but I am still not convinced that Eve should be balanced to enable mass sub caps to win all the time, I was never in favour of the nerf to Titan main gun tracking to stop them being used on sub caps, though I did agree with that nerf in terms of the DD. But this is different to the Super issue where the only counter is more supers, in this case you actually do have a counter in LR dreads. It has yet to be tested. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
baltec1 Bat Country Goonswarm Federation 9043	Posted - 2013.12.15 16:50:00 - [5] - Quote Alavaria Fera wrote: baltec1 wrote: Dracvlad wrote: The blob works against itself in terms of time due to TiDi too, so I see your point, but I am still not convinced that Eve should be balanced to enable mass sub caps to win all the time, I was never in favour of the nerf to Titan main gun tracking to stop them being used on sub caps, though I did agree with that nerf in terms of the DD. But this is different to the Super issue where the only counter is more supers, in this case you actually do have a counter in LR dreads. It has yet to be tested. as long as the 250 archons can refit fast enough and swap drones around, there's an escape mechanic that works when pointed, scrammed, bubbled, infinipointed, etc This is going to be fun Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
baltec1 Bat Country Goonswarm Federation 9044	Posted - 2013.12.15 17:09:00 - [6] - Quote ElQuirko wrote: Oh I like this reply to Mittens: Some Bloke wrote: "bottom line anything that attempts to mitigate the CFCs number advantage is OP and unfair to the blob. We also are using the mechanic we whine about to show how OP it is but its not hypocritical because we are doing it ironically. We just want the mechanics that don't support us winning to be nerfed, so we can go back to feeling smug about our ability to beat everyone due to the overwhelming subcap advantage. Seriously complaining about slowcats because you have trouble fighting them is like the hi-sec miners complaining about how easy it is to suicide gank." Riddle me this. If we cant kill it with our numbers what chance does anyone else stand? Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
baltec1 Bat Country Goonswarm Federation 9044	Posted - 2013.12.15 17:14:00 - [7] - Quote MestariBation wrote: Baltec fleet was the answer in Fountain, what has changed since? Sewers gone bad? 250 man sentry carrier fleets became a thing. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
baltec1 Bat Country Goonswarm Federation 9044	Posted - 2013.12.15 17:21:00 - [8] - Quote David Kir wrote: baltec1 wrote: Riddle me this. If we cant kill it with our numbers what chance does anyone else stand? A rather good chance, as long as they use the right tool, unlike the CFC did until now. That's a silly argument, numbers aren't always the deciding factor. Well lets look at this. They are immune to any subcap fleet and they have the largest supercap fleet. Who else has the power to stop them? Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
baltec1 Bat Country Goonswarm Federation 9051	Posted - 2013.12.16 05:01:00 - [9] - Quote Funny how we get blamed for for forcing the node down when there are 300 carriers dumping 10 sentries each and seemingly abandoning them to launch yet more. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
baltec1 Bat Country Goonswarm Federation 9052	Posted - 2013.12.16 05:10:00 - [10] - Quote MestariBation wrote: baltec1 wrote: Funny how we get blamed for for forcing the node down when there are 300 carriers dumping 10 sentries each and seemingly abandoning them to launch yet more. Node was fine then suddenly titans and node dead Funny how that keeps on happening in this war. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
baltec1 Bat Country Goonswarm Federation 9052	Posted - 2013.12.16 05:14:00 - [11] - Quote Honest Blob wrote: baltec1 wrote: Funny how we get blamed for for forcing the node down when there are 300 carriers dumping 10 sentries each and seemingly abandoning them to launch yet more. Nice try at deflecting the blame there. When we have recorded evidence of dbrb calling for the cfc to crash the node to save the dreads i think that pretty much puts a nail in it. As n3 could ahve crashed the node at any time by cynoing in thier 200man super fleet right on top of those dreads but didnt cus they wanted the kills. So because DBRB was being DBRB and said something jokingly you think that means that we deliberately crashed the node resulting in our ships becoming trapped and having to log into a likely very hostile bubblecamp with hundreds of carriers and a supercap/titan fleet ready to smack us down as we log in one by one? Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
baltec1 Bat Country Goonswarm Federation 9052	Posted - 2013.12.16 05:31:00 - [12] - Quote Pinky Hops wrote: Given a choice between that and losing the entire dread fleet, I can totally understand why the node crash would be preferable. Congrats on finding a "solution" to your situation... Given that capital losses were even I would say that a node crash was not in anyones interest. As fun as it is trying to pin blame on one side or the other the simple fact is that the nodes simply cannot handle the fleets being used in this war. A war the likes of which we have not seen since the attempted headshot of VFK. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
baltec1 Bat Country Goonswarm Federation 9052	Posted - 2013.12.16 05:41:00 - [13] - Quote It would seem ghost carriers have made a return. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
baltec1 Bat Country Goonswarm Federation 9052	Posted - 2013.12.16 05:58:00 - [14] - Quote If we are going to blame anything it would be the TCU that almost took out the node. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
baltec1 Bat Country Goonswarm Federation 9052	Posted - 2013.12.16 06:07:00 - [15] - Quote Tore Vest wrote: James Amril-Kesh wrote: . By your theory it would be N3/PL as the more likely party to crash the node intentionally since they dropped supers and titans, but you won't see me accusing them of doing so because I don't believe they did. Supers were not dropped... They were on standby... Supers was used after the nodecrash to save a titan. Titans were DDing dreads. Around 40 of them were deployed in the fight around an hour before the node died. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
baltec1 Bat Country Goonswarm Federation 9052	Posted - 2013.12.16 07:50:00 - [16] - Quote Azami Nevinyrall wrote: baltec1 wrote: Funny how we get blamed for for forcing the node down when there are 300 carriers dumping 10 sentries each and seemingly abandoning them to launch yet more. It's easy to point blame when its been streamed live for many to view... Because everything Boat says is the gospel truth and he never ever jokes or is sarcastic about things. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
baltec1 Bat Country Goonswarm Federation 9052	Posted - 2013.12.16 09:13:00 - [17] - Quote Alavaria Fera wrote: baltec1 wrote: Azami Nevinyrall wrote: baltec1 wrote: Funny how we get blamed for for forcing the node down when there are 300 carriers dumping 10 sentries each and seemingly abandoning them to launch yet more. It's easy to point blame when its been streamed live for many to view... Because everything Boat says is the gospel truth and he never ever jokes or is sarcastic about things. I thought boat was afk when it went down? At least he stopped fcing us bombers and kcolor did it... was he still around and streaming? He went to the airport but left himself slowboating through the fight while still streaming. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
baltec1 Bat Country Goonswarm Federation 9075	Posted - 2013.12.16 12:33:00 - [18] - Quote March rabbit wrote: what about "warp to 0" with fleet of smart-bomb BSs? Sentry will be dead on launch. carriers can't go anywhere. Even fighters will have bad time. add here fleet of close range dreadnoughts and you are ok. Carriers turn on their own smartbombs and the combined power kills that battleship fleet... Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
baltec1 Bat Country Goonswarm Federation 9075	Posted - 2013.12.16 12:40:00 - [19] - Quote Victoria Sin wrote: Speedkermit Damo wrote: Rage much Mittens? The more I read of this SOTA, the more I was reminded of the film "Downfall" I look forward to more rage and foam at the mouth vitriol from Adolf Mittler. What a strange angry little man. I don't think you should judge the success or otherwise of any given doctrine from one half-completed node-crashed battle. Wars like this always come down to attrition, don't they. We also go through a week to a month of welps at the start of every war too and DBRB gets relegated to frigate/cruiser fleets. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
baltec1 Bat Country Goonswarm Federation 9075	Posted - 2013.12.16 14:45:00 - [20] - Quote Ka'Narlist wrote: Funny that Slowcats weren't "a broken exploited fleet comp thats only used by cowards" when goons still called them "Das Boot" and had enough people logging in with them to rofl stomp N3 in the north Back then we didn't have 250+ using drone assist. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
baltec1 Bat Country Goonswarm Federation 9075	Posted - 2013.12.16 14:49:00 - [21] - Quote Tina Tin wrote: TL;DR of the past 3 pages ... Goons whining because they just got caught deliberately crashing the game (akin to a DDOS). Goons whining that it was actually PL/N3's fault because they dared to play the game as intended. Moar glorious tears about drones. What we are yet to see Goons admitting that they have lost control of the narrative at this point and are quickly becoming Morhus Mihi. Mittani seems to be broken and stuck in a circular arguement with himself about drones. Please provide this evidence that shows we are causing the nodes to crash and that its not the fact that there are thousands of drones being deployed, called back, redeployed, abandoned and fresh ones launched by both sides. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
baltec1 Bat Country Goonswarm Federation 9075	Posted - 2013.12.16 14:50:00 - [22] - Quote March rabbit wrote: baltec1 wrote: March rabbit wrote: what about "warp to 0" with fleet of smart-bomb BSs? Sentry will be dead on launch. carriers can't go anywhere. Even fighters will have bad time. add here fleet of close range dreadnoughts and you are ok. Carriers turn on their own smartbombs and the combined power kills that battleship fleet... is it standard for sentry-cap fleet to have smartbombs onboard? Best way to clear out frigs and fighters and fighter bombers. I would be surprised if they didn't at least have them in the hold to fit. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
baltec1 Bat Country Goonswarm Federation 9075	Posted - 2013.12.16 15:29:00 - [23] - Quote Ka'Narlist wrote: Yes, I'm sure everyone of your carrier pilots controlled his own drones and choose his own targets like a true PvP hero Drone assist fleets were not a thing back then. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
baltec1 Bat Country Goonswarm Federation 9087	Posted - 2013.12.19 08:49:00 - [24] - Quote Tina Tin wrote: Aiwha wrote: Marlona Sky wrote: Is there any other game mechanics you would not like us to use? Granted I'm enjoying the endless stream of tears coming from you guys because we stand for freedom and fight to keep eve from turning into the Blue Donut. We undock. CCP, I think you need to make use of the undock button an exploit. Its okay, the Goons will soon be whining that using the login screen should be "balanced" so that there are only 1 "pubbie" for every 10 goons logged in. Please goontrolls and Mittani lovers continue to cry, this is THE most entertaining thread on these forums for some time. Inst most of this thread bads trying to pin node crashes on an AFK DBRB? Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
baltec1 Bat Country Goonswarm Federation 9087	Posted - 2013.12.19 08:56:00 - [25] - Quote Beekeeper Bob wrote: Is biting on all the reverse trolling hurting your teeth? I find it sweet to the pallet. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
baltec1 Bat Country Goonswarm Federation 9087	Posted - 2013.12.19 09:05:00 - [26] - Quote Alavaria Fera wrote: baltec1 wrote: Beekeeper Bob wrote: Is biting on all the reverse trolling hurting your teeth? I find it sweet to the pallet. I admit I'm not entirely certain what exactly is going on here. I may have just licked a pubbie. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
baltec1 Bat Country Goonswarm Federation 9090	Posted - 2013.12.19 14:25:00 - [27] - Quote Tina Tin wrote: We do however blame you for attempting to meta out of the game a mechanic you are too lazy or incompetent to adapt to. EVE is a harsh world Goon, crying like a highsec pubbie just makes your entire alliance look like the griefing noobs you are. Capitals have been nerfed twice for this very thing already. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
baltec1 Bat Country Goonswarm Federation 9090	Posted - 2013.12.19 18:48:00 - [28] - Quote 1000 sentry neut geddons, one getting alpha'ed every few vollies (or even per volly) by carrier sentries. Sure they can cap out a good few of them but the damage never stops and the carriers can soon refit to pump cap around and the with the geddons needing to go point blank to be effective the carriers will simply fire up their smartbombs and remove all of the geddons drones. Hell, they could even remove the geddons with smartbombs. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
baltec1 Bat Country Goonswarm Federation 9090	Posted - 2013.12.19 19:13:00 - [29] - Quote Tina Tin wrote: You know there is this awesome ingame mechanic called transversal. Maybe before crying you guys should actually do some maths about it. Tell me more about armour battleships and their speed and small sig... Seems you know very little about things such as this game and when to use the word "crying". Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
baltec1 Bat Country Goonswarm Federation 9091	Posted - 2013.12.19 19:33:00 - [30] - Quote Tina Tin wrote: Again you fail to adapt, who said anything about battleships? No rather than ACTUALLY work at making a counter you rely on sperg, straw man arguements and straight out whine. If you quote me when I reply to someone talking about battleships and say Quote: You know there is this awesome ingame mechanic called transversal. then I am going to reply to you about those BS. Tina Tin wrote: You can work out how many dps boats are needed to gank a helpless freighter, you can work out how many catalysts are needed to gank a mining barge. Anything else and you are just dont have a clue. We have worked out how much firepower we need to try to alpha carriers. Subcaps cannot do it, hence the dreads. There are no subcap fleets that can tank or have the firepower to take on the carrier blob. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
baltec1 Bat Country Goonswarm Federation 9093	Posted - 2013.12.19 19:49:00 - [31] - Quote Tina Tin wrote: Alavaria Fera wrote: Thanks, people are having a great laugh at some of the hilarious please bomb us tia suggestions pubbies are putting out here I would like to personally like to thank the Goons, goonpets, goon renters and general Mittani alt army that has kept me entertained with their tears. Cannot wait to see Omegafailfleet get into a fight where your FC's cant order an attempt to crash the game, it was working so well for you last time. It was working. Turns out, most of the dead dreads were not omegafleet. You also seem to be misusing the words "tear, cry and crying" in this thread a lot. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
baltec1 Bat Country Goonswarm Federation 9093	Posted - 2013.12.19 20:07:00 - [32] - Quote Qmamoto Kansuke wrote: Tbh the naglfar strategy wasn't so bad but you guys failed to plan further ahead.You need to think 10steps in advance and it seem that your leader is only capable of 4-5stages of escalation by the looks of his plan.....Maybe its time you guys get a new guy to do them plans? For starters though I'd like to hear how would you counter the titans that got dropped on you last fight. We were ready for what came but turns out the node wasn't. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
baltec1 Bat Country Goonswarm Federation 9104	Posted - 2013.12.20 05:22:00 - [33] - Quote Faidin wrote: So N3 versus 80% of null-sec Eve...I hope they win. Goons and this CFC garbage are long overdue calamity. They own the other half of EVE and the bulk of the supers. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
baltec1 Bat Country Goonswarm Federation 9105	Posted - 2013.12.21 06:38:00 - [34] - Quote Pinky Hops wrote: And they wonder why they have no supers. Who said we don't have supers? Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.