And most importantly of all... these scientists seem to lack foresight enough to realize that even IF you discovered such a particle (and I mean for real not in imaginary land) you would still have to figure out what even tinier particle governs the interactions of a Higs Boson. And so on and so forth into tiny infinity.

And no one likes rewriting text books...

Ummm... what?


An RP metaphor based on a holographic pea that you can cut in half and yet not eat or want to use as a decoration? I don't follow this one sorry.

Oh, no. Utterly wrong.

There is HUGE money in revising text books. Not to mention, if they manage to find the Higgs Bosun, there is an infinity of new articles, monographs, and research grants to be had... full-time employment for whole armies of researchers, writers, and science-illiterate journalists.

Talks about stringtheory

I do not need to expand my horizons regarding this subject. String theory is opening up a whole new can of stupid. There is no theory more "Safe and unprovable" then string theory. It is one of the most ridiculous academically accepted theories every devised.



P.S. Since I think you are still role playing... as far as science fiction goes, I find the idea of eating holographic peas ridiculous from a sheer storyline perspective alone. Maybe in a CGI anime show, but not your run of the mill science fiction.

Nassim Haramein, is that you?

If at first you don't succeed try try again.

I have talked to a few folks who hated it. They of course were not profiting a great deal from their efforts. Regardless what I said was more of an ironic statement meant for people with with PHD's and many thousands invested in their outdated education.

"This 2011 image provided by CERN, shows a real CMS proton-proton collision in which four high energy electrons (green lines and red towers) are observed in a 2011 event"

Smoke smaller crack pipes. The effect will be less pronounced if you do. If not on crack, try reading the entire article and educating yourself on the matter at hand before commenting.

The European Organization for Nuclear Research, called CERN, says Thursday March 14, 2013 a look at all the data from 2012 shows that what they found last year was a version of what is popularly referred to as the 'God particle.'

in the above avatar...higgs-bosoms particles.

* Eternum reads what silens vesica is saying, and agrees with him.
*But fails to see the point or relevance to this thread.

*Drinks a cup of tea and moves on...

The European Organization for Nuclear Research, called CERN, says Thursday March 14, 2013 a look at all the data from 2012 shows that what they found last year was a version of what is popularly referred to as the 'God particle.'

I don't think a 2011 image is 2012 data, do you?

"This 2011 image provided by CERN, shows a real CMS proton-proton collision in which four high energy electrons (green lines and red towers) are observed in a 2011 event. The event shows characteristics expected from the decay of a Higgs boson but is also consistent with background Standard Model physics processes."

This is a representation of the kind of data they are dealing with. It is in fact an actual picture and there is no caption saying that is an illustration.

And yet, they are calling this picture of random subatomic decay of elementary particles... GÇ£godGÇ¥.

ITT: theists butthurt about science brandishing agitated nonsense. News at 11.

Start by learning about the real reason why the Higgs Boson was dubbed "the god particle", no need to have a degree on particle physics to understand that particular issue.

The hubris of ignorance...

So what qualifications has the OP got and what papers have you written?

So as you can see... I am extremely well vised on the subject.