EVE Search - What would happen if CCP finally nerfed hisec?

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

What would happen if CCP finally nerfed hisec?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 5 post(s)
blabla4711 Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire 0	Posted - 2014.01.11 13:06:00 - [1] - Quote baltec1 wrote: Why should the people willing to take risks not get better rewards over someone operating with near perfect safety? The usual shitposting of a goon .... afk-farming moongoo for years in ludicrous amounts for example is no "better reward"? Spare us your usual bullshit of a poor nullbear pubbie.
blabla4711 Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire 0	Posted - 2014.01.12 08:26:00 - [2] - Quote baltec1 wrote: Hasikan Miallok wrote: I really do not see what forcing casual players, especially the ones with real lives who are not glued to the keyboard every night while mummy brings them snacks and dinner, to just quit can achieve. I am a casual player with a job and things to do around the house. A good chunk of my corp have children to look after, jobs to go to etc. This argument is a myth and should never stop CCP from correctly balancing the game. Suuuuure ..... just like every supposed-to-be-female on the internet is a female for real ..... or the web grafitti of your master is really famous on the internet outside of your gooniverse .... or ccp had to enter a military complex to see ramsan-devices instead of just calling ramsan inc. at this time and get some test devices 2 years before ccp ever heard of them like any other company .... youre a brain surgeon with a house and family numbered 8+ at least and just post here 24x7 while you rest between your live saving ops you do each day. The internet is full of truth .... Wait .... didnt you say in the past that you post bs here because you fear ccp patch something because of posts of other persons on this forum as it had happened in the past you think? n1.
blabla4711 Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire 0	Posted - 2014.01.12 08:42:00 - [3] - Quote baltec1 wrote: blabla4711 wrote: The internet is full of truth .... Most EVE players have jobs. The whole casual players argument is nothing but a myth, very few are able to play 12+ hours a day. And why are you posting here? Most eve players dont play in nullsec. Most eve players dont care about your sandbox. Most eve players dont give a rats arse what nullsec does. So why do you pretend YOU speak on their behalf and have nerdrage about THEIR sandbox?
blabla4711 Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire 0	Posted - 2014.01.12 08:51:00 - [4] - Quote baltec1 wrote: blabla4711 wrote: And why are you posting here? Most eve players dont play in nullsec. Most eve players dont care about your sandbox. Most eve players dont give a rats arse what nullsec does. Most eve players dont even read here let alone post. So why do you pretend YOU speak on their behalf and have nerdrage about THEIR sandbox? Tell me, why should I and everyone else in null sec be forced to build in empire space rather than in our null sec empires? I dont care because i do the "adapt or die" you like to post instead of the "cry, stomp and lie on the forums" approach of persons like you. Nice try to change the subject btw but in vain. Dont cry in here to change to sandbox of others .... play your own or quit .... or like persons like you like to say .... htfu.
blabla4711 Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire 0	Posted - 2014.01.12 09:10:00 - [5] - Quote Dave Stark wrote: just because choices have consequences doesn't mean we can ignore balance issues. What balance? That 11% of the playerbase, some of them entering the forum full of tears, control a vast amount of systems which MAYBE have less prod-slots systemwise than the tiny number of hs-systems in comparison which have slightly more systemwise? Get serious ....
blabla4711 Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire 0	Posted - 2014.01.12 09:21:00 - [6] - Quote baltec1 wrote: The difference is that miners get to mine in high sec if they tank or not. I only have the option of going to high sec because it is impossible to compete if I go to null. I am willing to take the added risks and time to go live in null but right now there is no way even compete with high sec let alone earn more for that added risk. Ah ... the "myth" about "added risk" again ... still the usual lies, hu? I already brought the example the farming moongoo afk for years in a broken implementation ... care to show me techmoons in hs? No? You dont "earn" more already? Added risk? Where? in empty systems round the clock? Nullsec has already the potential to "earn" more for added risk. But you and persons like you loves to cry in here because they have to do it somewhat different than hs. Youre the "pubbies" of nullsec who cry, lie and dance in here like the highsec pubbies you love to babble about.
blabla4711 Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire 0	Posted - 2014.01.12 09:26:00 - [7] - Quote Dave Stark wrote: blabla4711 wrote: Dave Stark wrote: just because choices have consequences doesn't mean we can ignore balance issues. What balance? That 11% of the playerbase, some of them entering the forum full of tears, control a vast amount of systems which MAYBE have less prod-slots systemwise than the tiny number of hs-systems in comparison which have slightly more systemwise? Get serious .... if only 11% of players live there, that quite obviously suggests that there are very few reasons to go and live there, which is a balance issue. It's not about the number of production slots, it's about the activity as a whole. Well ... maybe 89% of the playerbase of eve dont want the way how to play their sandbox dictated by the 11%? Do we now get back to the "thesis" that the 89% play eve wrong and the 11% play the game right? Remember? Sandbox.
blabla4711 Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire 0	Posted - 2014.01.12 09:33:00 - [8] - Quote Dave Stark wrote: the topic; please stay on it. What was the topic again? Ah, yes. Nerf HiSec (89%) because they dont care about my playstyle (11%) but i cry to the forums about theirs. Right on spot.
blabla4711 Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire 0	Posted - 2014.01.12 09:45:00 - [9] - Quote Dave Stark wrote: blabla4711 wrote: Dave Stark wrote: the topic; please stay on it. What was the topic again? Ah, yes. Nerf HiSec (89%) because they dont care about my playstyle (11%) but i cry to the forums about theirs. Right on spot. for some one who uses "crying" a lot, most of the tears seem to be yours. I thought, you wanted to stay on topic. Nice try, tough cookie.
blabla4711 Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire 0	Posted - 2014.01.12 09:56:00 - [10] - Quote baltec1 wrote: Leeloo Alizee wrote: Hisec ppl will quit.. Puting to sleep 2 out of 3 acc aniway, hisec IS nerfed already. Got any evidence to back up those two claims? What evidence? You tell us your fairy tales without any evidence ever. Youre in no position to demand evidence from anyone.
blabla4711 Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire 0	Posted - 2014.01.12 10:07:00 - [11] - Quote baltec1 wrote: They are out here for more reasons than isk and some do think that you earn more in null. Tell me, if null earns people more why do 80% of bots live in high sec? Aaand another one .... prove your fairy tales before your demand proves from others. Remember .... you were the one who said in public that he posts bs on this forum to prevent ccp from patching something to your disadvantage.
blabla4711 Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire 0	Posted - 2014.01.12 10:34:00 - [12] - Quote Kimmi Chan wrote: blabla4711 wrote: baltec1 wrote: They are out here for more reasons than isk and some do think that you earn more in null. Tell me, if null earns people more why do 80% of bots live in high sec? Aaand another one .... prove your fairy tales before your demand proves from others. Ruby Porto had posted that statistic from CCP multiple times in this thread. You should go back and read it. Though I would say they operate in HS not live in HS. Ok, you got me a little on this one because baltec1 never proves anything and babbles without end. And this proof came from another poster. But now we put this "80% of all bots" percentage into the "89% of eve playerbase live/work in highsec" scheme and it says ..... exactly ... nothing. Statistics just say what you want to see.
blabla4711 Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire 0	Posted - 2014.01.12 11:03:00 - [13] - Quote Pipa Porto wrote: blabla4711 wrote: But now we put this "80% of all bots" percentage into the "89% of eve playerbase live/work in highsec" scheme and it says ..... exactly ... nothing. Statistics just say what you want to see. The most botting activity is where most people live? surprise, surprise. And this wasnt to the only point mentioned. You keep claiming that "89% of eve playerbase live/work in highsec." I (and probably CCP) would love to see how you got this information. http://cdn1.eveonline.com/community/QEN/QEN_Q4-2010.pdf said 11% Nullsec. CCP wouldnt be surprised by this number i guess. They provided it. But i admit that i forgot the low/wh numbers and just tallied up. search and replace 89 with 80%.
blabla4711 Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire 1	Posted - 2014.01.17 05:44:00 - [14] - Quote Nevyn Auscent wrote: is a lie. grasp Zergswarm-Gooners Shitposter and the usual vocal ForumHeroes including Tippia & Co posting bs/lies? News at 11
blabla4711 Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire 1	Posted - 2014.01.17 07:40:00 - [15] - Quote baltec1 wrote: Wrong. When you add onthe mission payout, mission bonus and LP payout you end up with more income than anoms. If CCP want to nerf isk being injected the should nerf all bounties. This nerf is just going to drive more of us into high sec. Always funny .... you ask everyone else to prove all that they say ... and if they do, you and people like you ignore it and repeat all their old bs again without end without any proof at their end because "you know better". Goon-Shitposting as usual.
blabla4711 Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire 1	Posted - 2014.01.17 07:48:00 - [16] - Quote baltec1 wrote: blabla4711 wrote: baltec1 wrote: Wrong. When you add onthe mission payout, mission bonus and LP payout you end up with more income than anoms. If CCP want to nerf isk being injected the should nerf all bounties. This nerf is just going to drive more of us into high sec. Always funny .... you ask everyone else to prove all that they say ... and if they do, you and people like you ignore it and repeat all their old bs again without end without any proof at their end. Goon-Shitposting as usual. Nobody to date has shown that null sec has higher income. It doest take a lot of looking to find all the data on this subject. Prove your point if its that easy with numbers and facts from official sources or be the shitposter/nullbear-pubbie as usual. I bet on the second.
blabla4711 Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire 2	Posted - 2014.01.18 05:39:00 - [17] - Quote baltec1 wrote: We have several times in this thread, but if you need it again I will dig them up when I get back tonight. However, while you wait you can go look up this info on many of the mission guides which have handy info such as isk breakdowns and times As expected .... nothing delivered and you have proven that youre simply an incompetent nullbear-crybaby and goon-shitposter. gd at its best. And please spare us the laughable bullshit to try to falsify the official numbers from ccp with some crap mission-runner or makeup goon-wiki-whatever websites you try to dig up with google. And you dare to accuse other poster of lying ....
blabla4711 Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire 3	Posted - 2014.01.18 08:18:00 - [18] - Quote baltec1 wrote: I used the Uni Wiki, feel free to point out where I was wrong. You didnt used anything at all, pretended that you needed to get back home to give us some surprisingly data which you didnt while you still posted all day here. Another very funny lie, shitposter. We provided links to data from ccp and you provide just one lie after another without any proof except "you know better".
blabla4711 Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire 3	Posted - 2014.01.18 08:28:00 - [19] - Quote baltec1 wrote: blabla4711 wrote: You didnt used anything at all, pretended that you needed to get back home to give us some surprisingly data which you didnt while you still posted all day here. Another very funny lie, shitposter. We provided links to data from ccp and you provide just one lie after another without any proof except "you know better". So you are saying that EVE Uni is telling lies on their Wiki? Are you also saying that EVE Survival is also making up everything on their mission guides? You lied. And you promised to provide data to support your lies which you didnt do and cant, of course. Poor tries to play the ball back to me. Go back playing with yourself, laughable liar.
blabla4711 Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire 4	Posted - 2014.01.19 11:17:00 - [20] - Quote Dave Stark wrote: spew nonsense. disregard actual proof. yeah and this is why everyone laughs at your posts. You mean like everyone laugh at your bullshit and the liars/shitposter from Zergswarm Gooners? "Everyone" like in just 11% of playerbase are nullsec but some of them crying and lying like mad and babbling about "most player" and "large portion" and such? You mean diregarding actual proof like you bullshitter ignoring numbers from ccp. the only one that can have access to real numbers? "Waaaah, but my mommy said im special"
blabla4711 Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire 9	Posted - 2014.02.03 20:26:00 - [21] - Quote baltec1 wrote: This from the people who have posted no evidence at all to back up their claims. Funny remark from Mr. Shitposter himself who never provided anything at all, talk baseless bullshit and pure lies all the time and is about to party because he found a conflict averse sissy like this kimmy-gal who invests his/her time to try to prove something that means absolutely nothing in this subject at hand while you laugh your asses off playing forumgames.
blabla4711 Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire 9	Posted - 2014.02.03 20:43:00 - [22] - Quote baltec1 wrote: I see you didnt read that link I provided to that spreadsheet that showed level 3 missions earned more isk that you said level 4s earned. All of the numbers I stated have been verified, you on the other hand have nothing but insults and have contributed nothing to this thread. Ah. More lies from Mr. Shitposter. Just link me where you, and you in person, provided any data. In contrast to you liar, i did. And while you are at it, link my post where i say anything about the possible isk from l4s. I didnt. Because this alone means next to nothing. Remember buddy ... its only an insult if its not true.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.