| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
18813
   |
Posted - 2014.01.09 21:42:00 -
[1] - Quote
stoicfaux wrote:*chuckle* Numbers and stats galore, but not one mention of the drone delegation problem. Funnily enough, if they changed it so that drone assist worked like drone delegation, a large part of that problem would vanish.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan 2.0. |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
18834
|
Posted - 2014.01.10 11:24:00 -
[2] - Quote
sparx Thiesant wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:I'd like to point out that "get one yourself" or any variation thereof in defense of something is not a good way to claim that it's not overpowered. why not? Because it is pretty much the textbook definition of overpowered: if nothing can beat X other than having more X:es than the opponent, then this inherently means that X is always the optimal choice. The existence of all other options are meaningless because they're not any kind of real options in practice. No matter what you throw at it, X is better.
GÇ£Get one yourselfGÇ¥ is the final resignation to this fact: that the only counter to X is X+1.
Quote:hey heres a idea lets cry about it till we get things changed Good. Overpowered things should be changed.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan 2.0. |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
18835
|
Posted - 2014.01.10 11:53:00 -
[3] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:If CFC use them they get a shed ton of supers dropped that they have no ability to counter. So how would (could?) such a force be countered?
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan 2.0. |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
18836
|
Posted - 2014.01.10 14:48:00 -
[4] - Quote
Malcolm from Marketing wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:I'd sure like to hear what you think is a good counter for 400+ slowcats. your own slows/dreads even supers with support. So, you're suggesting an GÇ£x+1GÇ¥ non-counter. In other words, you're saying that these things are rightfully going to get nerfed hard since they aren't balanced.
Jenn aSide wrote:stoicfaux wrote:IMO, a starting point would be a hard cap on the number of drones that drone assist can provide to a single ship. This wouldn't invalidate (horribly nerf) slowcats and it would allow everyone to gauge whether the "unified command and control" provided by drone assist is the primary problem or not. Exactly. A kind of drone assist "bandwidth" or something.
This already exists. It's called drone delegation, and should be a fairly trivial rule swap-in since there already is a class of drones that follows that particular rule.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan 2.0. |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
18836
|
Posted - 2014.01.10 15:48:00 -
[5] - Quote
Ka'Narlist wrote:I like how you constantly try to put yourself in the good spot here by saying "if we can't destroy those cap blobs how should anyone else be able too?" where without the cfc there wouldn't even be such a large other coalition to counter you. GǪwhich does not invalidate or in any way address the actual question and the concerns behind it.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan 2.0. |
| |
|