|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
dexington
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
1084
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 00:39:00 -
[1] - Quote
Abdul 'aleem wrote:My Little Pyongyang wrote:Suspect flag for going into someone's pocket without authorization sounds fun. It would cause more pvp. Isn't that what pocket invaders want overall? Surely they aren't looking for easy targets and are scrub-tier pvpers. It does seem that the biggest concern to the griefers is that this change will create more risk to them both in and out of the mission pocket. And they are right that if this suggestion is implemented, griefing missioners will no longer be so easy/relatively risk free.
You realize how easily griefers could exploit the suspect timer?
All you need to do is accept a mission on you main, make a bookmark of the mission location an give it to an alt. You can now proceed to warp the victim to that location, which no one in the fleet has access to, and kill him when he lands without concord intervention.
This is just going to be the MTU "exploit" allover, griefers exploiting ****** mechanics to kill inexperienced players.
It's a dumb idea that don't even remotely solves any mission problems, except maybe for marauders pilots getting attacked by destroyers. In most other cases things remain unchanged, because the griefer would enable suspect him self, in the cases where it might give the mission runner an advantage any effect can be nullified by bringing 1-2 extra people. I'm a relatively respectable citizen. Multiple felon perhaps, but certainly not dangerous. |
dexington
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
1086
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 11:50:00 -
[2] - Quote
Abdul 'aleem wrote:As has been discussed, the current warning system would be in full effect prior to any flag being applied and protecting the innocent.
How exactly would this warning help people getting fleet warped?, and what will happen to people who get disconnected and have dropped fleet when reconnecting? I'm a relatively respectable citizen. Multiple felon perhaps, but certainly not dangerous. |
dexington
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
1086
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 12:23:00 -
[3] - Quote
This suggestion is clearly not as simple as just applying suspect timer to anyone who enters a mission area.
You are literally suggesting changes to fleet, fleet warp and the procedure of reconnecting after a disconnect, this is not including what needs to be changed for the ownership of mission sites to work.
And you want all this done so people can't steal loot from cosmos missions?, this is beyond ridiculous... I'm a relatively respectable citizen. Multiple felon perhaps, but certainly not dangerous. |
dexington
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
1086
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 12:42:00 -
[4] - Quote
Abdul 'aleem wrote:dexington wrote:This suggestion is clearly not as simple as just applying suspect timer to anyone who enters a mission area.
You are literally suggesting changes to fleet, fleet warp and the procedure of reconnecting after a disconnect, this is not including what needs to be changed for the ownership of mission sites to work.
Only CCP knows how easy or hard it would be to implement. There are a lot of existing mechanics that do things very similar to what would be needed to for a suspect flag for mission invasion to work. They have been posted already supporting the opinion that CCP should be able to make this change. If you know of any specific technical reasons to support your statements, feel free to post them so people can discuss.
I find it very unlikely this is going to be considered a small prioritized issue, have you any idea how many years it took for ccp to fix neutral remote repping in hi-sec?
Even minor adjustments to the drone ui have been buried in the backlog for years, you clearly need to play eve for a few more years if you honestly believe this is something that is going to be implemented any time soon. I'm a relatively respectable citizen. Multiple felon perhaps, but certainly not dangerous. |
dexington
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
1094
|
Posted - 2014.01.29 19:13:00 -
[5] - Quote
Abdul 'aleem wrote:Thanks again for your ability to see past the lies, deception, fear mongering, trolling, thread crapping and spamming that have resulted from the inability to come up with any substantiated reason as to why this suggestion should not be implemented.
denial is the first step of acceptance... I'm a relatively respectable citizen. Multiple felon perhaps, but certainly not dangerous. |
|
|
|