| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 7 post(s) |
shivan
   |
Posted - 2006.04.12 12:43:00 -
[31]
 Originally by: Joshua Foiritain
Originally by: Orc A
and querious is not contested even though i asked BEFORE the mapchange?
You claim you are contesting Querious and Catch, yet have made no apparent effort to capture the stations, nor have you claimed soverneigty on any Fix systems, hence i find it highly unlikely SA is actually constesting any of querious.
Originally by: Orc A
What he meant was they are guests in our region and we are happy to host them.
Thats new, well see if VC actually confirms that.
Originally by: omega2
hm c) contested between SA/FIX and Firmus Ixion can't be becouse fix and sa are hostile each other
Hmmm that indeed does sound wrong 
Spealing as a Diplo for Stain, I can say that we have +ve standings with VC.
|
King Leonidas
|
Posted - 2006.04.12 12:46:00 -
[32]
Edited by: King Leonidas on 12/04/2006 12:47:07
Josh,
With regards Stain itself, we have pulled our forces out of the area.
We have removed all SA's industrial capabilities and will continue to remove any POS they attempt to put up in the area.
The only thing left in Northern Stain is the NPC stations. SE still currently live in the middle of Stain with VC living in the West.
I'm unsure how you will proceed with this but might be worth a bit of clarification on the point to stop endless whining in the thread.
Also, the delve warzone can be removed as there are no hostiles in the area.
King
|
Orc A
|
Posted - 2006.04.12 12:56:00 -
[33]
regarding Delve -
Indeed, SA pilled all forces out of Delve.
regarding the other stuff in bob's flamed reply - Lol.
Originally by: End Yourself
hey! we are BoB's lapdogs! not Oberon's or ASCN's!!!
|
k1Lz
|
Posted - 2006.04.12 13:05:00 -
[34]
Branch is contested nothing more to say ..
|
Adrianus
|
Posted - 2006.04.12 14:23:00 -
[35]
Quote:
hm c) contested between SA/FIX and Firmus Ixion can't be becouse fix and sa are hostile each other
Looks like a typo - should be "SA/Huzzah vs. Firmus Ixion", correct?
|
omega2
|
Posted - 2006.04.12 14:33:00 -
[36]
aswell the constellation T-L301 is claimed of -Z- / -JK- / E-I (that's the constellation behind 4gq )
|
Orc A
|
Posted - 2006.04.12 15:02:00 -
[37]
So, when BoB rolls in a big hac gang and places 1 POS it's contested but when we roll in an actual fleet, place a POS, shut down 2 main systems there are "special rules?"
I would respect the rules if you yourself wouldn't have spit on them.
Not to metion Stain is an NPC region while Querious / catch are not.
Originally by: End Yourself
hey! we are BoB's lapdogs! not Oberon's or ASCN's!!!
|
TWD
|
Posted - 2006.04.12 15:13:00 -
[38]
Edited by: TWD on 12/04/2006 15:13:35
Originally by: Orc A
when we roll in an actual fleet, place a POS, shut down 2 main systems there are "special rules?"
Which 2 main systems are you talkin about, and placed a POS in which system? |
King Leonidas
|
Posted - 2006.04.12 15:43:00 -
[39]
Originally by: Orc A
So, when BoB rolls in a big hac gang and places 1 POS it's contested but when we roll in an actual fleet, place a POS, shut down 2 main systems there are "special rules?"
I would respect the rules if you yourself wouldn't have spit on them.
Not to metion Stain is an NPC region while Querious / catch are not.
Then please, understand that Josh nor any of the rest of Eve are mind-readers and explain yourself succinctly.
You have to tell people what you want, what you are doing and why. This makes it a lot easier for everyone to understand.
King
|
Orc A
|
Posted - 2006.04.12 16:21:00 -
[40]
Edited by: Orc A on 12/04/2006 16:21:52
TWD: why am i suppoed to give you that information?
I mean, why do you bother asking?
Why does it even concern you?
It is not relevent if you understand what i want or not. it is relevent if josh understands.
He can understand from my posts what i want.
You may not be able to do so because some of them were already removed by Abdalion in a thread cleanup.
take the smack elsewhere, jesus...
Originally by: End Yourself
hey! we are BoB's lapdogs! not Oberon's or ASCN's!!!
|
|
|
Dianabolic
|
Posted - 2006.04.12 16:28:00 -
[41]
Point is Orc A, no - we don't understand what you want and, actually, it is vital to us whether we understand you or not because then we know whether we agree, or not, with what you're saying.
And you've seen how easy it is to get things changed when all parties are in agreement, surely?
As for "Why do you want to know [where our pos is]?" it's so we can come and blow it up.
Originally by: Thomas Jefferson
A society that will trade a little liberty for a little security will lose both and deserve neither
|
Coranor
|
Posted - 2006.04.12 16:33:00 -
[42]
Originally by: Orc A
Edited by: Orc A on 12/04/2006 16:21:52
TWD: why am i suppoed to give you that information?
I mean, why do you bother asking?
Why does it even concern you?
It is not relevent if you understand what i want or not. it is relevent if josh understands.
He can understand from my posts what i want.
You may not be able to do so because some of them were already removed by Abdalion in a thread cleanup.
take the smack elsewhere, jesus...
The thing is though if we can't understand you then how do you know if Josh can. I'm pretty sure that he's not psychic either.
--------------
|
Svetlanna
|
Posted - 2006.04.12 16:59:00 -
[43]
Thank you to update your map taking into account the folllowing:
Stain is Stain space, uncontested.
Thank you.
|
Orc A
|
Posted - 2006.04.12 17:01:00 -
[44]
Quote:
Point is Orc A, no - we don't understand what you want and, actually, it is vital to us whether we understand you or not because then we know whether we agree, or not, with what you're saying.
Josh should understand because he (i hope) read my previous posts.
You haven't.
You aren't supposed to be agreeing or disagreeing as you (bob) aren't part of this anymore... My statements are regarding Querious and Catch (and a few sidenotes regarding Stain) So, how is this any of your concern again?
Originally by: End Yourself
hey! we are BoB's lapdogs! not Oberon's or ASCN's!!!
|
King Leonidas
|
Posted - 2006.04.12 17:08:00 -
[45]
Edited by: King Leonidas on 12/04/2006 17:14:43
Originally by: Orc A
Quote:
Point is Orc A, no - we don't understand what you want and, actually, it is vital to us whether we understand you or not because then we know whether we agree, or not, with what you're saying.
Josh should understand because he (i hope) read my previous posts.
You haven't.
You aren't supposed to be agreeing or disagreeing as you (bob) aren't part of this anymore... My statements are regarding Querious and Catch (and a few sidenotes regarding Stain) So, how is this any of your concern again?
It's our concern because we are not going to allow you to put any pos in place nor take over any space.
But in order for you to attempt to contest somewhere in accordance with the rules of the map thread, you will unfortunately have to explain exactly what you are contesting, how you are contesting it and what you are contesting it with otherwise I and the rest of the alliances around and no doubt the mapmaker will simply say "you're lying, prove it".
The same as every other alliance in the game has to.
Otherwise they are not contesting it, they are mearly playing
hide and seek in space.
The point of the map thread is so that alliances can state what they are doing and where.
If you are afraid to state your current position in detail (like every other alliance in the game) then perhaps you should reconsider asking for a contested region.
King
|
King Leonidas
|
Posted - 2006.04.12 17:08:00 -
[46]
Edited by: King Leonidas on 12/04/2006 17:14:43
Originally by: Orc A
Quote:
Point is Orc A, no - we don't understand what you want and, actually, it is vital to us whether we understand you or not because then we know whether we agree, or not, with what you're saying.
Josh should understand because he (i hope) read my previous posts.
You haven't.
You aren't supposed to be agreeing or disagreeing as you (bob) aren't part of this anymore... My statements are regarding Querious and Catch (and a few sidenotes regarding Stain) So, how is this any of your concern again?
It's our concern because we are not going to allow you to put any pos in place nor take over any space.
But in order for you to attempt to contest somewhere in accordance with the rules of the map thread, you will unfortunately have to explain exactly what you are contesting, how you are contesting it and what you are contesting it with otherwise I and the rest of the alliances around and no doubt the mapmaker will simply say "you're lying, prove it".
The same as every other alliance in the game has to.
Otherwise they are not contesting it, they are mearly playing
hide and seek in space.
The point of the map thread is so that alliances can state what they are doing and where.
If you are afraid to state your current position in detail (like every other alliance in the game) then perhaps you should reconsider asking for a contested region.
King
|
Alasse Cuthalion
|
Posted - 2006.04.12 17:20:00 -
[47]
Seriously, you need to remember exactly what it is you're "contesting", you're contesting someones ownership of a region... How can you possibly claim you own a region when you haven't even attempted to take any of the stations?
Current RKK Ranking: (CAL15) Gensui |
Avernus
|
Posted - 2006.04.12 17:48:00 -
[48]
Originally by: Orc A
So, when BoB rolls in a big hac gang and places 1 POS it's contested but when we roll in an actual fleet, place a POS, shut down 2 main systems there are "special rules?"
I would respect the rules if you yourself wouldn't have spit on them.
Not to metion Stain is an NPC region while Querious / catch are not.
In regards to Querious:
SA placed 1 small POS in H74. This POS was destroyed. All 3 stations within Querious are in FIX hands, and while there have been some interuptions in daily business, and several battles have occured in our territory, no serious attempt for control has been made.
Ex-JCoS, Ex-Diplomat, Ex-Councilor, Ex-CEO
(posts no longer represent Firmus Ixion) |
Bedrock
|
Posted - 2006.04.12 18:59:00 -
[49]
wow, how freakin' difficult is it to place the latest date of the map on the topic title...............
------------------
Frustrated:  |
TRIGGER
|
Posted - 2006.04.12 20:44:00 -
[50]
to the map maker .
Please accept my replies only in this thread as offical SA .
The war marker for delve can be removed if the other party agrees .
The contested marker for Stain space should also be removed and replaced with a war marker revelent to sa vs se .
There are not sufficient pilots from any other alliance in the area to warrant any other marker at this time .
The war marker for querious is fine at this time and does not warrant a contested marker .
ps. no further posts by SA members are required in this thread .
|
|
|
Mystiel Raleigh
|
Posted - 2006.04.12 21:09:00 -
[51]
Originally by: TRIGGER
to the map maker .
Please accept my replies only in this thread as offical SA .
The war marker for delve can be removed if the other party agrees .
The contested marker for Stain space should also be removed and replaced with a war marker revelent to sa vs se .
There are not sufficient pilots from any other alliance in the area to warrant any other marker at this time .
The war marker for querious is fine at this time and does not warrant a contested marker .
ps. no further posts by SA members are required in this thread .
Awesome.
|
Khirzan Wolfson
|
Posted - 2006.04.12 21:42:00 -
[52]
CORRECTION suggestion: KOS shares Scalding Pass region with -V-, so the kos side of scalding shouild cover towards curse and like half-way to 1v- veritas scalding outpost
-Khirzan Wolfson
X/O, The Taining Corp
KOS Senator, TheT
KOS Foreign Affairs Minister
|
King Leonidas
|
Posted - 2006.04.12 22:42:00 -
[53]
Originally by: TRIGGER
to the map maker .
Please accept my replies only in this thread as offical SA .
The war marker for delve can be removed if the other party agrees .
The contested marker for Stain space should also be removed and replaced with a war marker revelent to sa vs se .
There are not sufficient pilots from any other alliance in the area to warrant any other marker at this time .
The war marker for querious is fine at this time and does not warrant a contested marker .
ps. no further posts by SA members are required in this thread .
Agreed completely.
Glad to have someone back in charge with their head screwed on.
King
|
Orc A
|
Posted - 2006.04.12 23:55:00 -
[54]
never claimed i was incharge of anything in this thread, was just presenting facts.
stop digging in the flame history books.
better yet, grow up.
Originally by: End Yourself
hey! we are BoB's lapdogs! not Oberon's or ASCN's!!!
|
Aart Bluestoke
|
Posted - 2006.04.13 00:55:00 -
[55]
Edited by: Aart Bluestoke on 13/04/2006 00:56:45
would it be possible to show empire space on the map (sec rating >.5 and >0 ? it might be usefull for people to be able to see areas of 0.0 that aren't directly claimed at the moment.
(sections from pure blind, providance, syndicate ect)
either that, or have a currently not claimed section to the map
|
Zekk Pacus
|
Posted - 2006.04.13 01:58:00 -
[56]
Anything with a name on it (with the exception of Aridia which I believe is empire space but could be wrong about) is an 0.0 region.
|
Dianabolic
|
Posted - 2006.04.13 09:25:00 -
[57]
Originally by: Orc A
never claimed i was incharge of anything in this thread, was just presenting facts.
stop digging in the flame history books.
better yet, grow up.
Originally by: TRIGGER
Please accept my replies only in this thread as offical SA .
ps. no further posts by SA members are required in this thread .
ta ta.
Originally by: Thomas Jefferson
A society that will trade a little liberty for a little security will lose both and deserve neither
|
HC MasiEEE
|
Posted - 2006.04.13 13:50:00 -
[58]
Originally by: Orc A
never claimed i was incharge of anything in this thread, was just presenting facts.
stop digging in the flame history books.
better yet, grow up.
Listen too your boss little grunt 
____________
HC MasiEEE
|
Xthril Ranger
|
Posted - 2006.04.13 16:24:00 -
[59]
Originally by: Orc A
never claimed i was incharge of anything in this thread, was just presenting facts.
stop digging in the flame history books.
better yet, grow up.
Only one poster/alliance , so just by posting facts you claim to be in charge.
you'll never jump alone |
Coug
|
Posted - 2006.04.13 22:25:00 -
[60]
VC is not under SA command. But we will confirm that we currently have blue standings to SA
VC is our own entity, odd as we might be to the galactic theatre.
Since I was brought in to this thread, I will reiterate that VC still does not participate in territorial control squabbles, and (officially) does not care what/where we are represented. I cannot say that individial soldiers share that viewpoint of course. If we officially change our minds, I'm sure we'll make that known.
-----------------
~C~ |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |