Originally by: The Enslaver

---

Edited by: The Enslaver on 12/04/2006 01:33:56
And include date of latest map in the topic name

---

Originally by: Shin Ra

---

How about all the alliances' nominated people get listed on the first post so everyone can just ignore the others.

---

Originally by: Abdalion

---

Originally by: The Enslaver

---

Edited by: The Enslaver on 12/04/2006 01:33:56
And include date of latest map in the topic name

---

No thanks

---

Originally by: The Enslaver

---

Originally by: Abdalion

---

Originally by: The Enslaver

---

Edited by: The Enslaver on 12/04/2006 01:33:56
And include date of latest map in the topic name

---

No thanks

---

And why? Its incredibly useful and doesn't exactly harm anything.

Some people.

---

Originally by: Abdalion

---

Originally by: The Enslaver

---

Originally by: Abdalion

---

Originally by: The Enslaver

---

Edited by: The Enslaver on 12/04/2006 01:33:56
And include date of latest map in the topic name

---

No thanks

---

And why? Its incredibly useful and doesn't exactly harm anything.

Some people.

---

Why don't you ask the mapmaker to put a date in his post when he edits it. I already have to babysit this thread enough with all the off-topic and flaming that happens within.

And back at ya.

---

Originally by: The Enslaver

---

Originally by: Abdalion

---

Originally by: The Enslaver

---

Edited by: The Enslaver on 12/04/2006 01:33:56
And include date of latest map in the topic name

---

No thanks

---

And why? Its incredibly useful and doesn't exactly harm anything.

Some people.

---

Originally by: End Yourself

---

hey! we are BoB's lapdogs! not Oberon's or ASCN's!!!

---

Originally by: IcedBach Jr

---

This map maker is biased and should be ashamed of his kissing up to BOB

---

Originally by: End Yourself

---

hey! we are BoB's lapdogs! not Oberon's or ASCN's!!!

---

Originally by: Orc A

---

Then explain Why Stain region is contested when noone is contesting it, and querious is not contested even though i asked BEFORE the mapchange?

---

Originally by: Orc A

---

Then explain Why Stain region is contested when noone is contesting it, and querious is not contested even though i asked BEFORE the mapchange?

---

Originally by: Joshua Foiritain

---

Contesting a Region with PCS;
This is the easy one, invade the region, cap the stations, Blow up a lot of their ships, kill a few POSes they have sitting around and the next update should reflect your ownership.

---

Originally by: King Leonidas

---

Originally by: Orc A

---

Then explain Why Stain region is contested when noone is contesting it, and querious is not contested even though i asked BEFORE the mapchange?

---

Why don't you contact Josh direct and ask him in accordance with the rules instead of blaming him of being a BoB lapdog.

And if you look carefully at the Stain Region, it isn't contested, there are just too many different corps living there in the NPC stations to state an overall alliance has complete control, e.g. VC, SE, SA etc

King

---

Originally by: Joshua Foiritain

---

Contesting a Region with PCS;
This is the easy one, invade the region, cap the stations, Blow up a lot of their ships, kill a few POSes they have sitting around and the next update should reflect your ownership.

---

Originally by: End Yourself

---

hey! we are BoB's lapdogs! not Oberon's or ASCN's!!!

---

Originally by: King Leonidas

---

The rules are the rules and everyone else seems to manage to agree that they are correct.

Furthermore, at no point, at any time in the map thread has SA ever stated that VC are under their control so if you don't tell the mapmaker then he won't know.

Will be nice to let VC know they are being controlled by you though.

King

---

Originally by: Orc A

---

and querious is not contested even though i asked BEFORE the mapchange?

---

Originally by: Orc A

---

What he meant was they are guests in our region and we are happy to host them.

---

Originally by: omega2

---

hm c) contested between SA/FIX and Firmus Ixion can't be becouse fix and sa are hostile each other

---

Originally by: Joshua Foiritain

---

Originally by: Orc A

---

and querious is not contested even though i asked BEFORE the mapchange?

---

You claim you are contesting Querious and Catch, yet have made no apparent effort to capture the stations, nor have you claimed soverneigty on any Fix systems, hence i find it highly unlikely SA is actually constesting any of querious.

Originally by: Orc A

---

What he meant was they are guests in our region and we are happy to host them.

---

Thats new, well see if VC actually confirms that.

Originally by: omega2

---

hm c) contested between SA/FIX and Firmus Ixion can't be becouse fix and sa are hostile each other

---

Hmmm that indeed does sound wrong

---

Originally by: End Yourself

---

hey! we are BoB's lapdogs! not Oberon's or ASCN's!!!

---

Quote:

---

hm c) contested between SA/FIX and Firmus Ixion can't be becouse fix and sa are hostile each other

---

Originally by: End Yourself

---

hey! we are BoB's lapdogs! not Oberon's or ASCN's!!!

---

Originally by: Orc A

---

when we roll in an actual fleet, place a POS, shut down 2 main systems there are "special rules?"

---

Originally by: Orc A

---

So, when BoB rolls in a big hac gang and places 1 POS it's contested but when we roll in an actual fleet, place a POS, shut down 2 main systems there are "special rules?"

I would respect the rules if you yourself wouldn't have spit on them.
Not to metion Stain is an NPC region while Querious / catch are not.

---

Originally by: End Yourself

---

hey! we are BoB's lapdogs! not Oberon's or ASCN's!!!

---

Originally by: Thomas Jefferson

---

A society that will trade a little liberty for a little security will lose both and deserve neither

---

Originally by: Orc A

---

Edited by: Orc A on 12/04/2006 16:21:52
TWD: why am i suppoed to give you that information?
I mean, why do you bother asking?
Why does it even concern you?


It is not relevent if you understand what i want or not. it is relevent if josh understands.
He can understand from my posts what i want.
You may not be able to do so because some of them were already removed by Abdalion in a thread cleanup.

take the smack elsewhere, jesus...

---

Quote:

---

Point is Orc A, no - we don't understand what you want and, actually, it is vital to us whether we understand you or not because then we know whether we agree, or not, with what you're saying.

---

Originally by: End Yourself

---

hey! we are BoB's lapdogs! not Oberon's or ASCN's!!!

---

Originally by: Orc A

---

Quote:

---

Point is Orc A, no - we don't understand what you want and, actually, it is vital to us whether we understand you or not because then we know whether we agree, or not, with what you're saying.

---

Josh should understand because he (i hope) read my previous posts.
You haven't.
You aren't supposed to be agreeing or disagreeing as you (bob) aren't part of this anymore... My statements are regarding Querious and Catch (and a few sidenotes regarding Stain) So, how is this any of your concern again?

---

Originally by: Orc A

---

Quote:

---

Point is Orc A, no - we don't understand what you want and, actually, it is vital to us whether we understand you or not because then we know whether we agree, or not, with what you're saying.

---

Josh should understand because he (i hope) read my previous posts.
You haven't.
You aren't supposed to be agreeing or disagreeing as you (bob) aren't part of this anymore... My statements are regarding Querious and Catch (and a few sidenotes regarding Stain) So, how is this any of your concern again?

---

Originally by: Orc A

---

So, when BoB rolls in a big hac gang and places 1 POS it's contested but when we roll in an actual fleet, place a POS, shut down 2 main systems there are "special rules?"

I would respect the rules if you yourself wouldn't have spit on them.
Not to metion Stain is an NPC region while Querious / catch are not.

---

Originally by: TRIGGER

---

to the map maker .
Please accept my replies only in this thread as offical SA .
The war marker for delve can be removed if the other party agrees .
The contested marker for Stain space should also be removed and replaced with a war marker revelent to sa vs se .
There are not sufficient pilots from any other alliance in the area to warrant any other marker at this time .
The war marker for querious is fine at this time and does not warrant a contested marker .

ps. no further posts by SA members are required in this thread .

---

Originally by: TRIGGER

---

to the map maker .
Please accept my replies only in this thread as offical SA .
The war marker for delve can be removed if the other party agrees .
The contested marker for Stain space should also be removed and replaced with a war marker revelent to sa vs se .
There are not sufficient pilots from any other alliance in the area to warrant any other marker at this time .
The war marker for querious is fine at this time and does not warrant a contested marker .

ps. no further posts by SA members are required in this thread .

---

Originally by: End Yourself

---

hey! we are BoB's lapdogs! not Oberon's or ASCN's!!!

---

Originally by: Orc A

---

never claimed i was incharge of anything in this thread, was just presenting facts.
stop digging in the flame history books.
better yet, grow up.

---

Originally by: TRIGGER

---

Please accept my replies only in this thread as offical SA .

ps. no further posts by SA members are required in this thread .

---

Originally by: Thomas Jefferson

---

A society that will trade a little liberty for a little security will lose both and deserve neither

---

Originally by: Orc A

---

never claimed i was incharge of anything in this thread, was just presenting facts.
stop digging in the flame history books.
better yet, grow up.

---

Originally by: Orc A

---

never claimed i was incharge of anything in this thread, was just presenting facts.
stop digging in the flame history books.
better yet, grow up.

---

Originally by: Pehova Mindtriq

---

the 5 disbanded so they prolly don't control Venal and branch.

---

Originally by: Beringe

---

I hope everyone is ready to show a little patience.

---

Originally by: Gyro DuAquin1

---

marker 11 can be removed there is nothing big goin on in tribute with d2 involved

---

Originally by: Amthrianius

---

Abdalion, can you change the date to the european format (where ccp is based) i.e. 12.04.06

Not the american way that the majority of people dont understand

Thanks

---

Originally by: Darpz

---

Originally by: Amthrianius

---

Abdalion, can you change the date to the european format (where ccp is based) i.e. 12.04.06

Not the american way that the majority of people dont understand

Thanks

---

damn you euopeans and doing stuff backwards

---

Originally by: Amthrianius

---

Abdalion, can you change the date to the european format (where ccp is based) i.e. 12.04.06

Not the american way that the majority of people dont understand

Thanks

---

Originally by: taylor04

---

carebears on ***** and friends currently claim the system of rqh, we have atleast 30 killmails in the past 2 days and are in control of the system more often than not

---

Originally by: Abdalion

---

Originally by: Amthrianius

---

Abdalion, can you change the date to the european format (where ccp is based) i.e. 12.04.06

Not the american way that the majority of people dont understand

Thanks

---

I isn't just the american way

---

Originally by: Amthrianius

---

Originally by: Abdalion

---

Originally by: Amthrianius

---

Abdalion, can you change the date to the european format (where ccp is based) i.e. 12.04.06

Not the american way that the majority of people dont understand

Thanks

---

I isn't just the american way

---

maybe but it confuses people as all the other previous maps are done in the "normal" way and to change it now is silly as the previous dates for past maps are in the "normal" way so its out of place

:/

---

Originally by: TOGAKURE Daisuke

---

d/m/y (day, month, year) is used by:
<insert 48 countries here>

yyyy-mm-dd (year, month, day), the ISO 8601 standard, is used by:
<insert 12 countries here>

m/d/y (month, day, year) is used by:
Canada
USA

Ergo, vast minority of population uses the m/d/y format. Please, get on with the program.

---

Originally by: Raeff

---

a
vale = not sure

---

Originally by: Raeff

---

snip

---

Originally by: Vishnej

---

Originally by: Raeff

---

snip

---

V.O.I.D currently lives in Vale and the constellation of Geminate by LS-Jep.

Does OSS go wherever ERA go? IE, a sister alliance sort of arrangement?

---

Originally by: Smokemon

---

update from Catch:

FAT and all systems west including 4-07 are now under Huzzah control, Fix has withdrawn any remaining POS's (that we know of) into querious so it should no longer be contested. Querious/Catch should continue to have warzone markers. Querious as of right now is not contested yet (4-18-06).

People fighting in Querious/Catch (as per my knowledge)

HF/SA/SMASH/TSDS vs. Fix
BoB is also around shooting everyone and their presence is often enough it should be noted.

CHIMP / LV have paid visits to Catch but aren't around enough to be added to the warzone marker (IMO) but if you have questions on that you can contact Hans Roaming (HF) or someone from Shinra or CHIMP.

-Smokemon, GSY, HF

---

Originally by: Smokemon

---

update from Catch:

FAT and all systems west including 4-07 are now under Huzzah control, Fix has withdrawn any remaining POS's (that we know of) into querious so it should no longer be contested. Querious/Catch should continue to have warzone markers. Querious as of right now is not contested yet (4-18-06).

People fighting in Querious/Catch (as per my knowledge)

HF/SA/SMASH/TSDS vs. Fix
BoB is also around shooting everyone and their presence is often enough it should be noted.

CHIMP / LV have paid visits to Catch but aren't around enough to be added to the warzone marker (IMO) but if you have questions on that you can contact Hans Roaming (HF) or someone from Shinra or CHIMP.

-Smokemon, GSY, HF

---

Originally by: AvanCade

---

Edited by: AvanCade on 20/04/2006 02:23:26

Originally by: Smokemon

---

update from Catch:

FAT and all systems west including 4-07 are now under Huzzah control, Fix has withdrawn any remaining POS's (that we know of) into querious so it should no longer be contested. Querious/Catch should continue to have warzone markers. Querious as of right now is not contested yet (4-18-06).

People fighting in Querious/Catch (as per my knowledge)

HF/SA/SMASH/TSDS vs. Fix
BoB is also around shooting everyone and their presence is often enough it should be noted.

CHIMP / LV have paid visits to Catch but aren't around enough to be added to the warzone marker (IMO) but if you have questions on that you can contact Hans Roaming (HF) or someone from Shinra or CHIMP.

-Smokemon, GSY, HF

---

When we want to be noted we will post about it, till then go about your lil buisness.

---

Originally by: Gunther Hoosler

---

Could we get 7 removed please?

I know there have been countless flames (and probably more to ensue) about the removel of this 'warzone' but, BoB are posing no threat to the locals of Aridia at this time.

The hollow threat from SirMolle is now but a distant memory, but one that still makes me chuckle. had me going for a second or two

---

Originally by: DB Preacher

---

Josh,

Just check the BoB killboard. Our killing of aridia locals continues even more now than at anytime previously.

In fact, we've killed about 30 VC up there since the beginning of this month alone, without everyone else we have been killing there.

The warzone is a warning to new players about our killing in the area and should be left there for this reason.

Thanks,
dbp

---

Originally by: Gunther Hoosler

---

I stand by my request, not that Josh 'I love BoB' Foiritain would go against y'all.

---

Originally by: Kyoko Sakoda

---

This is the most ridiculous thing I've heard all month. Must be the 4/20.

As far as I can tell, BoB is, in fact, still making a warzone out of Aridia. I don't speak just from what I see on the killboard; I have sources.

---

Originally by: Kyoko Sakoda

---

Originally by: Gunther Hoosler

---

I stand by my request, not that Josh 'I love BoB' Foiritain would go against y'all.

---

This is the most ridiculous thing I've heard all month. Must be the 4/20.

As far as I can tell, BoB is, in fact, still making a warzone out of Aridia. I don't speak just from what I see on the killboard; I have sources.

---

Originally by: riggsbie

---

your sauce is all wrong - don't remember seeing you in Aridia recently?

---

Originally by: Kyoko Sakoda

---

Fact remains that it is a danger zone.

---

Originally by: DB Preacher

---

Edited by: DB Preacher on 20/04/2006 17:14:50

huh?

Not really sure why this is under discussion especially considering this is the map thread and not a discussion thread.

Are we or are we not killing in aridia on a daily basis?
Yes, we are killing on a daily basis, in fact, except our brief time in EC-P8R at the very start of the month, we have killed something in aridia every single day this month.

Are we "bringing" it against VC in aridia?
I don't see VC mentioned anywhere on marker No. 7.

It's simply a warning for people who think it will be safe to visit the area. It won't be.

Not really sure why VC feel they have to argue about every single thing every single time there is a clean up in the map thread but keep blowing off steam and calling the mapmaker names if it makes you feel better.

In future, perhaps it would be best if you let someone with a cooler temperament like Coug make the VC map announcements.

Thanks,
dbp

---

Originally by: Thomas Jefferson

---

A society that will trade a little liberty for a little security will lose both and deserve neither

---

Originally by: Gunther Hoosler

---

As for calling the mapmaker names, i am not the only one to think that this map is ever-so slightly biased.

---

Originally by: Dianabolic

---

It's a warzone because we, an official alliance, actively patrol and engage non-friendly targets in it.

In the last 20 days we've destroyed 134 ships, including 47 battleships and lost a total of 39, including 4 battleships.

That's a dangerzone.

As we're a bit more "present" than pirates, a pirate infestation is not applicable. A warzone marker certainly is.

---

Originally by: Dianabolic

---

It's a warzone because we, an official alliance, actively patrol and engage non-friendly targets in it.

In the last 20 days we've destroyed 134 ships, including 47 battleships and lost a total of 39, including 4 battleships.

That's a dangerzone.

---

Originally by: Cmd Woodlouse

---

Originally by: Dianabolic

---

It's a warzone because we, an official alliance, actively patrol and engage non-friendly targets in it.

In the last 20 days we've destroyed 134 ships, including 47 battleships and lost a total of 39, including 4 battleships.

That's a dangerzone.

---

Sorry, have to disagree here, 134 destroyed ships in 20 days in a whole region is rly not much, diana....

---

Originally by: Thomas Jefferson

---

A society that will trade a little liberty for a little security will lose both and deserve neither

---

Originally by: AvanCade

---

Edited by: AvanCade on 20/04/2006 02:23:26

Originally by: Smokemon

---

update from Catch:

FAT and all systems west including 4-07 are now under Huzzah control, Fix has withdrawn any remaining POS's (that we know of) into querious so it should no longer be contested. Querious/Catch should continue to have warzone markers. Querious as of right now is not contested yet (4-18-06).

People fighting in Querious/Catch (as per my knowledge)

HF/SA/SMASH/TSDS vs. Fix
BoB is also around shooting everyone and their presence is often enough it should be noted.

CHIMP / LV have paid visits to Catch but aren't around enough to be added to the warzone marker (IMO) but if you have questions on that you can contact Hans Roaming (HF) or someone from Shinra or CHIMP.

-Smokemon, GSY, HF

---

When we want to be noted we will post about it, till then go about your lil buisness.

---

Originally by: AvanCade

---

Edited by: AvanCade on 20/04/2006 02:23:26

Originally by: Smokemon

---

update from Catch:

FAT and all systems west including 4-07 are now under Huzzah control, Fix has withdrawn any remaining POS's (that we know of) into querious so it should no longer be contested. Querious/Catch should continue to have warzone markers. Querious as of right now is not contested yet (4-18-06).

People fighting in Querious/Catch (as per my knowledge)

HF/SA/SMASH/TSDS vs. Fix
BoB is also around shooting everyone and their presence is often enough it should be noted.

CHIMP / LV have paid visits to Catch but aren't around enough to be added to the warzone marker (IMO) but if you have questions on that you can contact Hans Roaming (HF) or someone from Shinra or CHIMP.

-Smokemon, GSY, HF

---

When we want to be noted we will post about it, till then go about your lil buisness.

---

Originally by: Dianabolic

---

Originally by: Cmd Woodlouse

---

Originally by: Dianabolic

---

It's a warzone because we, an official alliance, actively patrol and engage non-friendly targets in it.

In the last 20 days we've destroyed 134 ships, including 47 battleships and lost a total of 39, including 4 battleships.

That's a dangerzone.

---

Sorry, have to disagree here, 134 destroyed ships in 20 days in a whole region is rly not much, diana....

---

I agree Woodie, but what can you do? We patrol that region every single day, you can't kill ships that insta-dock / log / run off at every opportunity - and even then that's only if u get past the Huff camps in Vehan / udianoor.

But hey, if u wanna just base that marker on ships destroyed you can do that, by removing the marker it'll probably give us more targets anyway, so tbh it'll probably benefit us anyway.

/me shrugs.

Crux of the matter is, we try to be as honest as possible in this thread, and in doing so we believe a warzone marker is appropriate (or other associated: Don't go here if ur not friendly with x, y or z). We also believe that the only reason anyone would try to change that status is to score cheap political points.

It's all gravy.

---

Originally by: Kyoko Sakoda

---

Originally by: riggsbie

---

your sauce is all wrong - don't remember seeing you in Aridia recently?

---

I do not have to be in Aridia to know what's going on down there. Certainly it's not impossible to have friends living in different regions telling you what's up?

Anyway, like DB said, it's not really up for discussion. The name calling doesn't help. If it makes the anti-BoB evangelists feel better (sigh), Josh can replace #7 with a marker similar to #1 without BoB's name on it. Fact remains that it is a danger zone.

---

Originally by: Jowen Datloran

---

Edited by: Jowen Datloran on 21/04/2006 09:40:34
Being a neutral reader of the map I must agree that the continues marking of BOB in Aridia does indeed smell of favourism big time.

Just who are they fighting? Me, if I passes through? How is that different from any low sec ganking?
And if it's ment as a warning for rookies, then why are many other and much more dangerous locations inside empire controlled space then not market? I bet more people get killed in Amamake in a week than in the whole of Aridia in a month.

---

Originally by: Thomas Jefferson

---

A society that will trade a little liberty for a little security will lose both and deserve neither

---

Originally by: O Thief

---

Marginis Imports now claims all of Providence, please update your map accordingly

http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=326919

---

Originally by: riggsbie

---

Stick to commenting on a region you are actualy involved in rather than gobbing off about something you have 3rd hand information on. Comments from BoB, whilst inaccurate, are legitimate. (you see, BoB actualy come down to Aridia)

---

Originally by: King Leonidas

---

I didn't realise Celestial Apoc were claiming space now

King

---

Originally by: Baun

---

Originally by: King Leonidas

---

I didn't realise Celestial Apoc were claiming space now

King

---

and your comment has no relevance to my post. I am trying to smooth out a disagreement that is far too contentious as to be silly.

---

Originally by: Nifel

---

Originally by: Baun

---

Originally by: King Leonidas

---

I didn't realise Celestial Apoc were claiming space now

King

---

and your comment has no relevance to my post. I am trying to smooth out a disagreement that is far too contentious as to be silly.

---

It's not your place to do that. If you wanna talk about the map and the choices the mapmaker makes create a thread in this forum, inform the moderators of it and have your discussion there.

---

Originally by: Baun

---

Edited by: Baun on 21/04/2006 17:22:32

Originally by: Nifel

---

Originally by: Baun

---

Originally by: King Leonidas

---

I didn't realise Celestial Apoc were claiming space now

King

---

and your comment has no relevance to my post. I am trying to smooth out a disagreement that is far too contentious as to be silly.

---

It's not your place to do that. If you wanna talk about the map and the choices the mapmaker makes create a thread in this forum, inform the moderators of it and have your discussion there.

---

I don't get why you would object. Do you have any problem with the content of my post? Or do you simply insist on objecting to it regardless?

My intent isn't to hijack this thread or to let other people do it by posting replies to me without reading what I said. I presented a fair reason why that war marker should be looked at, and a resoluition to it that everyone should agree to. I've said what I wanted to say, if you want to continue this discussion evemail me or convo me.

---

Originally by: King Leonidas

---

Why are Celestial Apocalypse STILL in this thread when they don't claim any of the map, don't have anything to do with the situation and have nothing at all in the slightest to add to the discussion?

---

Originally by: Baun

---

I presented a fair reason why that war marker should be looked at, and a resoluition to it that everyone should agree to. I've said what I wanted to say, if you want to continue this discussion evemail me or convo me.

---

Originally by: Thomas Jefferson

---

A society that will trade a little liberty for a little security will lose both and deserve neither

---

Originally by: Praitar

---

south geminate deserves a war marker at the very least

---

Originally by: AvanCade

---

Edited by: AvanCade on 21/04/2006 00:10:00
Do you even read why i replied to the post your alliance chap made...he mentioned about marking bob as well with the named alliances shooting fix, and such i replied if we need to be noted we will make a point of it.

---

Originally by: RaYmEn

---

Edited by: RaYmEn on 23/04/2006 11:16:12
Please mark Venal as Morhus Mihi, Razor and D2 territory because these people are living there.

---

Originally by: thoth foc

---

Originally by: RaYmEn

---

Edited by: RaYmEn on 23/04/2006 11:16:12
Please mark Venal as Morhus Mihi, Razor and D2 territory because these people are living there.

---

alot of ppl are living in venal atm.. others include risk, domination empire, era and other non aligned corps

---

Originally by: zacuis

---

pureblind is no longer contested between frege and ekp. war is now over. ekp holds the constellation K-quvw and Frege hold constelation 304z-r and s4gh-i. also on the last map the contested zone doesnt cover systems ga-6pc b-9c24 and 7rm-no could you plz include them on the next map as part of frege space. only small differences but we only a small allience and it means alot to us :-)

---

Originally by: King Leonidas

---

I disagree.

There are more than just the Imp and VC in Aridia as can be seen from our Killboard.

King

---

Originally by: Shiwan Khan

---

Ok then by ur reasoning back when CA claimed The Great Wildlands and there were those random pilots roaming the B-VIP corridor and say SA killed a few of these roaming pilots, would you then argue that CA had no claim on GW and label that as "Great Wildands locals"?

---

Originally by: Nebba Kenezzer

---

Originally by: Shiwan Khan

---

Ok then by ur reasoning back when CA claimed The Great Wildlands and there were those random pilots roaming the B-VIP corridor and say SA killed a few of these roaming pilots, would you then argue that CA had no claim on GW and label that as "Great Wildands locals"?

---

[ 2005.06.17 07:15:16 ] (combat) Shiwan Khan [VOTF] lands a hit on you which glances off, causing no real damage.

an appendum to your sig

You should also reconsider exactly what message you are trying to convey here.

---

Originally by: taylor04

---

ive gotten 21 bs kills in rqh in the last 7 days, and thats just me, http://killboard.eve-aoi.com/home.php for other killamils, and theres been alot of corps who have claimed territories and as the alliance thing, were unofficial and we call ourselves "smackilicious" considering we have fatballs as a member

---

Originally by: fisty

---

why not add the outposts to map...

---

Originally by: pshepherd

---

Originally by: fisty

---

why not add the outposts to map...

---

because there are an awful lot of them, and they'd make the map look really messy?

---

Originally by: Avallon

---

Edited by: Avallon on 22/04/2006 23:23:58
Remedial, since you are not Galactic Aurora member you don't have to talk in our name.

---

Originally by: Fragm/thedragoon

---

So we know what we are doing YES
do we expect this to be all over in 2 weeks NO
are we going to see it through to the end YES

---

Originally by: Remedial

---

Seems a bit odd to contest conquerable space that has 50 POSs in it when you aren't blowing them up

---

Originally by: Arnold Swartzenegger

---

Alektorophobia is spelled incorrectly on the map
On the map it is spelled "Alektrophobia" whereas it's correct spelling is "Alektorophobia."

---

Originally by: Crucifier

---

You have a contested space over stain, but nothing on your list. Oh and, stain is NOT contested

---

Originally by: Joshua Foiritain

---

Stain is marked as a multi faction warzone. Why? Because i am still looking for a good sources of who actually controls what in stain.

---

Originally by: Joshua Foiritain

---

Originally by: Arnold Swartzenegger

---

Alektorophobia is spelled incorrectly on the map
On the map it is spelled "Alektrophobia" whereas it's correct spelling is "Alektorophobia."

---

You people need to get an easier name
Will fix it though.

Originally by: Crucifier

---

You have a contested space over stain, but nothing on your list. Oh and, stain is NOT contested

---

Stain is marked as a multi faction warzone. Why? Because i am still looking for a good sources of who actually controls what in stain.

---

Originally by: Crucifier

---

No1 is controlling the whole area its split to constellions tbh

---

Originally by: Crucifier

---

Originally by: Joshua Foiritain

---

Originally by: Arnold Swartzenegger

---

Alektorophobia is spelled incorrectly on the map
On the map it is spelled "Alektrophobia" whereas it's correct spelling is "Alektorophobia."

---

You people need to get an easier name
Will fix it though.

Originally by: Crucifier

---

You have a contested space over stain, but nothing on your list. Oh and, stain is NOT contested

---

Stain is marked as a multi faction warzone. Why? Because i am still looking for a good sources of who actually controls what in stain.

---

No1 is controlling the whole area its split to constellions tbh

---

Originally by: Remedial

---

I'd like to request that Syndicate be partitioned into three regions.

3FA space is clearly the "PC9 and behind" pocket, nobody challenges this.

OSS space is VV- and behind, with S-U8 as the capital. Although there is fighting in this area, there is no serious challenge to OSS's grip on this constellation. There are thousands of us living there.

The cluster of systems which includes 97X, Y9G, UTKS, 5-T and the back trail of systems which connect 97X and UTKS is predominantly controlled by NBSI, Supremacy and Black Reign Syndicate, but is now being challenged by OSS with the assistance of ERA.

I realize that this means slicing Syndicate into smaller pieces, but it would be a more accurate characterization of the map than one big "multi faction warzone" label.

---

Originally by: Fedaykin Naib

---

Were we supposed to get an updated map already?

---

Originally by: Remedial

---

New map posted, please update thread title.

http://www.eve-files.com/media/corp/CRII/Latest.jpg

---

Originally by: Mr Popov

---

I think a nice addition would be to include all the ISS stations with a marker.

---

Originally by: ParMizaN

---

Originally by: Mr Popov

---

I think a nice addition would be to include all the ISS stations with a marker.

---

Actually thats not a half bad idea. A marker for all public trade outposts/hubs in 0.0 would be a really cool addition, and encourage their growth (which is what CCP wants, no?)

---

Originally by: Rajon Kelper

---

no, chauss, simply because there is not any major fighting going on.

Only d2 activity in vale to speak of, besides perhaps the occasion camp here and there, is miner ganks.

Could be disputed whether or not tribute even deserves the marker.

---