CCP - Please re-look at 0.0 and the risk vs reward and skill/isk investment vs return for 0.0 activities. Please consider the progression within 0.0 and compared to HS.

Maybe I'm doing things wrong .... but given that I'm able to make around ~100M isk/hr in High Sec L4's and only around 120M isk/hr in 0.0 (running FHs) something doesn't add up given the risks.

Personally, I think CCP has hit 0.0 PVE income with the nerf bat a little too hard.

CCP - Please re-look at 0.0 and the risk vs reward and skill/isk investment vs return for 0.0 activities. Please consider the progression within 0.0 and compared to HS.

Maybe I'm doing things wrong .... but given that I'm able to make around ~100M isk/hr in High Sec L4's

Maybe I'm doing things wrong .... but given that I'm able to make around ~100M isk/hr in High Sec L4's and only around 120M isk/hr in 0.0 (running FHs) something doesn't add up given the risks.

Personally, I think CCP has hit 0.0 PVE income with the nerf bat a little too hard.

CCP - Please re-look at 0.0 and the risk vs reward and skill/isk investment vs return for 0.0 activities. Please consider the progression within 0.0 and compared to HS.

Nah. What nullsec needs is a move away from faucets as a source of personal income.

GǪI suppose that could still make them GǣbetterGǥ from a qualitative rather than quantitative standpoint though.

Maybe I'm doing things wrong .... but given that I'm able to make around ~100M isk/hr in High Sec L4's and only around 120M isk/hr in 0.0 (running FHs) something doesn't add up given the risks.

Personally, I think CCP has hit 0.0 PVE income with the nerf bat a little too hard.

CCP - Please re-look at 0.0 and the risk vs reward and skill/isk investment vs return for 0.0 activities. Please consider the progression within 0.0 and compared to HS.

Need more Isk sinks all over the game to be honest. The fact alliances can generate hundreds of billions just from renting space is just a testament at how much isk actually available in a game like this. The fact we could even have Trillions of ISK destroyed with no real lasting effect on the economy or the entities involved is just a testament to how much isk is readily available in this game.

There needs to be a massive reduction in available ISK from all sources.

What we need is a literal faucet in space that spews isk, which we drive our ship up to and sit at, like baby birds in the nest at feeding time.

Right, because new players deserve to spend 6 months in a frigate while they try to grind isk for a cruiser. Hitting isk making activities across the board really screws new players. They have a hard enough time as it is.

I think it should be nerfed to max 30 mil/hr in Highsec and max 60 mil/hr in nullsec.

I think you should rephrase this with a bit more hyperbole.

I feel this thread is lacking some faith.

If you have an idea you should put it in F&I. If you would like something formally introduced or voiced to CCP you can also try the CSM forums.

Otherwise this thread lacks any real content and will amount to nothing but trolling. Just like the last one that was locked for the same reason.

At least throw out a potential solution so the ideas can be argued.

Add LP as part of the reward structure to increase income from Null Anoms and dilute the market of LP goods in high sec. Use the additional ISK pouring into the LP store sink to increase bounties in Null to compensate and prevent ISK scarcity and/or deflation.

OP compares null sec anoms with high sec L4 missions. I hate shooting rats and avoid it like the plague, but even I can see there's something fundamentally wrong in this comparison.

There needs to be a massive reduction in available ISK from all PASSIVE sources.

No, we need worse isk faucets in hisec.