GǪaside from facts that inconveniently blow planet-sized holes in your suggestions for EVE.

Well, that's sad because we're having such a fun time trying to fill in those gaps in your knowledge. I know learning is hard and tiresome, but just hang in there and something might stick.

Incorrect.

I lost my train of thought again.

None of you have anything to offer me intellectually it is like talking to children, I am growing tired of the lack of understanding of how economies and our universe works, it isn't even related to my original post in any manner. Every time someone attacks me they offer nothing substantial to back their claims, and most of you have a reading comprehension problem and mistake the meaning of my posts. I am done arguing with imbeciles.

Anyone who thinks fiat currency is sustainable is a shill, anyone who thinks a resource based economy would make a better game is smart.

steve jobs is a pseudo intellectual.

There is no such thing as passive income generation. That would be if you just dropped something that ticked along merrily increasing the amount of ISK in your wallet at a steady rate without supervision or interaction.

EVE has passive resource generation. Those resource still need to be gathered, processed, transported and either sold or used. They need, in other words, to be actively interacted with in order to turn them into income.

Actually pocos pay out pure isk.

Actually pocos pay out pure isk.

Actually pocos pay out pure isk.

Actually pocos pay out pure isk.

The OP is clearly batshit, but that aside, I could be down for a trit-based economy, which is what I assume we would operate on if isk didn't exist (can you imagine hauling freighters full of Trit into Jita to buy that officer mod), since without a common trade item (as much as I would love it, I don't think there are enough Long-limbed roes or exotic dancers to base an economy off them ), bartering would be a complete clusterfuck of contract orders with odd bartering details.(Hmm, I need to trade some of my Hobgonlins for an Invulnerability Field, so I can trade that for a thousand missiles... urgh).

Boring grinding doesn't encourage anyone to subscribe or log in.

CCP had an opening for a lead game designer, I applied to the job, but apparently I don't have the qualifications required to tell people what to do.

In eve the grind is boring due to bad game design. The grind should be incorporated into the game from tutorial until forever, the grind in eve is camping a station to make your enemies cry, thats boring as well. It may be fun though thanks to the social interaction you experience while grinding, which is the point of a social game.

Grinding asteroids is boring, chatting with friends while you both grind asteroids is fun. You're bored because you are boring.

True enough. They're still ISK sinks, though (or at best ISK neutral and even then only if you skip the entire creation process), so the OP's complaint about inflation from passive income sources is still off by miles.

How much does it cost to put one up?

And given how often the "reinforced" bars pop up all over the place, do they ever get their ROI even close to 1?

0.0 is the pvp realm, only passive income is needed there. High sec is the pve realm. Everyone knows this.

0.0 pve is more varied and imo fun.

Yes, they are entirely isk sinks. However the post I responded to claimed there was no passive income generation, they sure are.

Why am i here?