| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
corbexx
eXceed Inc.
No Holes Barred
173
   |
Posted - 2014.03.06 08:12:00 -
[1] - Quote
AssassinationsdoneWrong wrote:The fact you look like you got owned lately in a C3 "*****" hole should probably not be mentioned here.
haha thats funny.
OK really off topic but i just spent 10 minutes looking for a gif of axe from dota 2 saying Dunked or you got dunked
if some one could sort me a funny gif i'll happily pay them (best one if loads do gifs)
I think the big issue is alot from lower classes as people have said want to stay off the radar. Ive found it much easier to just mail people who ask for help on forums, probably have 12 to 15 people i regularly get mails from to help with advice in some way.
I know a few groups used to have training corpsand others who recruit from bigger groups liek drop bears and bni, SSC used to take alot from eve uni (i think)
I think alot of smaller corps are also just mates who dont want to go to larger groups but just do there own thing
|
corbexx
eXceed Inc.
No Holes Barred
179
|
Posted - 2014.03.12 10:29:00 -
[2] - Quote
I have to say i certainly think income should be increased in c1 to c4 (or atleast c1 and c2) the risk people take in them compared to level 4's in hisec or incursions is a bit of a joke |
corbexx
eXceed Inc.
No Holes Barred
179
|
Posted - 2014.03.12 11:05:00 -
[3] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:corbexx wrote:I have to say i certainly think income should be increased in c1 to c4 (or atleast c1 and c2) the risk people take in them compared to level 4's in hisec or incursions is a bit of a joke Where is the risk if you keep one eye on the wormhole and one eye on D-scan? Maybe there is as risk of going cross eyed but that's about it. War decs do not have the same effect on a wormholer, as they do on L4 runners so it's not really a fair comparison. When you run missions in high sec, you will often have to do a little bit of travelling between systems to accept/complete your mission, so why should C1 & C2 wormholes be buffed to the point where someone can just stay in one systems and watch the isk roll in? The ability to roll your static means your potential income is limitless. I don't understand why some many people are advocating for less activity in wormhole space.
let me ask you this is there greater risk in a wh doing sites or in hisec doing stuff??
yes you can be war decced and while it wont affect wh's as much a small group living in a c1 or c2 will be affected alot more than a big c5 or c6 group as they have loads of alts to haul while the c1 c2 guys probably don't
people in a c1 and c3 with static hisec lowsec wont be able to "roll for endless wh sites as you say"
yeah people in c2 might be able to but depending on static they might not have the numbers or experience to do some of the stuff (eg 1 person can do a c2 but he might not be able to do the stuff in a c4 static) |
corbexx
eXceed Inc.
No Holes Barred
180
|
Posted - 2014.03.12 11:45:00 -
[4] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:
That depends on the situation. If i was a L4 runner and i got war decced, the risk of being attacked would be pretty high.
We arent talking wardecs here just general day to day, simple yes or no is wh space riskier than hisec
Rek Seven wrote:
All wormholes can be rolled so i'll stick to me belief that the potential to earn isk in wormhole space is limitless. However, if you live in a hole that is not fit for your needs, that is your problem. You can either find a new one or make the one you have work for you.
Please explain how I can roll a c1 or c3 with static hisec or lowsec, for limitless wh isk
yes i do agree if you can't manage stuff in your static then the wh isn't right for you. |
corbexx
eXceed Inc.
No Holes Barred
180
|
Posted - 2014.03.12 13:51:00 -
[5] - Quote
Bleedingthrough wrote:Rek Seven wrote:1c3crysta1 wrote:
Even though its harder and more riskful to roll statics for smaller corps (which are mostly living in C1-C4s), I've heard that ppl in C5+ WHs never farm outside their own system while it's a big part of the income for most others. Which means that to make a living in C1-C4s takes more risk and provides less income compared to C5+ WHs. And this is simply because they got numbers and capitals?
I really think that the capital escalations in C5s shouldn't reset after DT. That'd make content and end this skewed ISK/risk-inbalance for C5+ WHs.
That's half true. People roll more frequently in C5/C6 space so you can still be jumped on at any moment and if you're flying caps, you might me stuck in siege and triage for up to five minutes. ... That said, I think you might be right in that CCP should probably look at the site spawning mechanic to encourage C5/C6 people to PVE in their static more. If you got more than 2 brain cells the risk is really minimal compared to the income. And even if you get jumped you are in a very advantageous position.
Tbh this isn't correct if people are rolling to gank siting crews they will have a fleet ready to destroy it. the people attacking have nearly all the advantages.
If its a log on trap they will have eve on exactly whois taking damage from sleepers, there fleet will be pvp fit not pve. if its people rolling for pvp then it will generally be a big group of people who have a fleet ready to roll. the surprise factor often causes alot of panic. Often siting crews are multi boxing which is slightly harder than just concentrating on 1 ship. |
| |
|